Hi
On Tuesday 1 September 2020 at 11:43:33 AM, in
, Peter Meyns wrote:-
> The message is not encrypted, merely signed. Without
> PGP installed you
> won't be able to verify the signature though.
I can't verify the signature either: GnuPG hasn't found me a copy of Stefan's
key.
--
Best reg
Hello Peter Meyns,
>> Why can I read your PGP encoded message, although, AFAIK,
>> no PGP is installed here that could decode it.
> The message is not encrypted, merely signed. Without PGP installed you
> won't be able to verify the signature though.
Ah, thanks, understood.
I will not install PG
Hi Gunivortus,
on Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:31:27 +0200GMT (01.09.2020, 12:31 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
GG> ... just curious ...
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
^^
GG> Why can I read your PGP encoded message, although, AFAIK,
GG> no PGP is installed here that could decode
Hello Stefan,
... just curious ...
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Fixed for the next Beta, thank you! :-)
Why can I read your PGP encoded message, although, AFAIK,
no PGP is installed here that could decode it.
--
Kind regards,
Gunivortus Goos
The Bat! Professional 64 bit, version 9.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Andrew,
> 3. TheBat! crashes instantly without producing an error message / etc.
Fixed for the next Beta, thank you! :-)
- --
Best regards,
Stefan Tanurkov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iHUEARYIAB0WIQQo9xg+jmSIDoP2QHksuDTcSnBdwwUCX04gEgAKC
Hi
On Monday 31 August 2020 at 1:01:39 PM, in
, Andrew Savchenko wrote:-
> Hello,
> 1. Select an e-mail in "Sent" folder that is reply to
> a letter stored _not_
>under the main "Inbox" folder.
> 2. Use either an option in the right-click menu or
> hit +
> 3. TheBat! crashes instantly wit
Hello Andrew,
Monday, August 31, 2020, 7:01:39 AM, you wrote:
> 1. Select an e-mail in "Sent" folder that is reply to a letter stored _not_
>under the main "Inbox" folder.
> 2. Use either an option in the right-click menu or hit +
> 3. TheBat! crashes instantly without producing an error mess
Hello,
1. Select an e-mail in "Sent" folder that is reply to a letter stored _not_
under the main "Inbox" folder.
2. Use either an option in the right-click menu or hit +
3. TheBat! crashes instantly without producing an error message / etc.
POP3 account, OTFP (on-the-fly-encrypted) mail stor
Hi
On Tuesday 7 October 2014 at 2:55:11 AM, in
, Chasonek wrote:
> My hard drive crashed and I was able to get almost
> all the stuff off the hard drive, but when I
> attempt to import the bat files, TheBat does not see
> them as it's own files. How do I get the
> files/emails back
> My hard drive crashed and I was able to get almost all the stuff off
> the hard drive, but when I attempt to import the bat files, TheBat
> does not see them as it's own files.
> How do I get the files/emails back into TheBat, since there are
> several emails that are very important
My hard drive crashed and I was able to get almost all the stuff off
the hard drive, but when I attempt to import the bat files, TheBat
does not see them as it's own files.
How do I get the files/emails back into TheBat, since there are
several emails that are very important to me.
Th
Hello TBUDL@thebat.,
Monday, January 28, 2013, 6:26:57 PM, you wrote:
GG> Hi David,
>>> where in the The Bat settings can I find my registration key?
>> It is in the registry.
GG> Thought so... but where?
>> I have just had to a crash repair, and did the followin
Hello Gunivortus,
Monday, January 28, 2013, 4:33:59 PM, you wrote:
>> where in the The Bat settings can I find my registration key?
GG> Problem solved.
GG> My wife told me, I'd printed the mail with the key. So I searched my
desperately
GG> chaotic desk room and indeed found the paper. :-)
So
Hello Gunivortus,
Monday, January 28, 2013, 2:26:57 PM, you wrote:
GG> As I wrote, Acronis can't access the image from an external
GG> harddisk. And the whole mailbase was involved - the repair
GG> company simply formatted the second drive to install Linux there.
GG> So my only chance is to resto
> where in the The Bat settings can I find my registration key?
Problem solved.
My wife told me, I'd printed the mail with the key. So I searched my desperately
chaotic desk room and indeed found the paper. :-)
Kind regards,
Gunivortus
Current v
Hi David,
>> where in the The Bat settings can I find my registration key?
> It is in the registry.
Thought so... but where?
> I have just had to a crash repair, and did the following
> Install TB!
> Restore from a backup
> Install key from mail.
As I wrote, Acronis c
On 27 January 2013, 19:30, Gunivortus Goos wrote:
> Unfortunately they also destroyed the operating system (Windows 8 Pro)at
> my system disk and erased my second disk with all my data to install Linux for
> those tests.
> Acronis was unable to restore a backup from an external harddisk.
> The exc
Hi,
writng this from the computer of my wife
where in the The Bat settings can I find my registration key?
Reason:
after my computer ran in terrible hardware problems, it went back to the shop
and they tested it and replaced several hardware parts.
Unfortunately they also destroyed the o
Heisan!
I good a serious problem. My HDD crashed recently (and I had to reinstall my
OS, of course without a full backup of my mails), but I could recover at
least my TB- and mail-folder.
So I thought, great... just do a reinstall and you got all your mails
back... well, the reinstall obviously r
Hello Richard,
Friday, January 9, 2009, 8:17:44 AM, you wrote
> I've now had a response via the RitLabs Ticket system and they asked for
> more information (from .txt & .log files in root of mail directory tree) and
> supplied a Beta version since 4.1.7. I'd also looked at paying for the
> upgra
Hi tracer,
Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 4:56:30 AM, tracer (0tra...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 7:49:56 AM, you wrote:
>
>> I'll raise this with the RitLabs Ticket system, but thought I'd ask here in
>> case anyone can provide a quick solution. I have reverted to a previous
>
ollowing error
> message:
> Access violation at address 0072374C in module ‘thebat.exe’. Read of address
> 000C.
After I had installed there was no executable so no crash (g), just no
email.
I restored by running a reinstall of the old version. NO other changes
but note you may ha
Since I've had an abortive attempt to move from 4.0.38 to 4.1.7 (and then
reverting to the former version) I have had a problem opening the Address
Book. Every time I attempt this The Bat! crashes with the following error
message:
Access violation at address 0072374C in module ‘thebat.exe’. R
Hello Stuart,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:10:03 + GMT (30/10/2006, 22:10 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Hemming wrote:
SH> I suffered a machine failure and have had to have it rebuilt.
SH> I had a copy of my mail folder, and a backup and it's running OK
SH> EXCEPT TB! is telling me I'm running an unlicenced
Hello Roelof,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 9:42:10 AM, you wrote:
>
> Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
> just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have
> instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Quin.
Beat you
--
Hallo Quin,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:12:30 +0100 (BST)GMT (16-10-2006, 17:12 +0200,
where I live), you wrote:
QP>
QP> Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just
Hallo Quin,
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:12:30 +0100 (BST)GMT (16-10-2006, 17:12 , where
I live), you wrote:
QP> [Cross posted with online forum]
So is my answer. ;-)
QP> Just after the initial splash banner, I get an exception error from
QP> thebat.exe.
When you're running TB with an unencrypted me
Hello Quin,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 9:12:30 AM, you wrote:
> Q
>
> Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all
Hello Quin,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 9:12:30 AM, you wrote:
> Wondering if anyone can help -- I can't open a ticket without my
> registration key and I can't get to my registration key because my
> email doesn't work.
Are you using OTFE (On The Fly Encryption)? If not, the mail database
is plain
[Cross posted with online forum]
Wondering if anyone can help -- I can't open a ticket without my
registration key and I can't get to my registration key because my email
doesn't work.
I purchased TheBat Professional a month ago and have been very happy with
it up until last Tuesday morning, when
Dear All,
I am considering moving to Voyager and have been testing on my laptop.
Voyager is working on the laptop but when I try to run it on my
desktop PC (with TheBat! installed) It asks for the password and then
crashes!
AppName: voyager.exe AppVer: 3.85.3.0ModName: kernel32.dll
> It looks like you've done almost everything that you could try.
> Last option with TB is to put the .tbb files in folders. (Forget about
> the .tbi, they'll only cause problems in this kind of situations.) And
> release folder maintenance on these folders.
> Folder maintenance might result in a v
On Thursday, June 1, 2006, 8:17:37, Maurice McAdam wrote:
JS>> Err, SpinRite is a scam, don't use it.
> I bought it to recover my daughter's files on a memory stick. I was
> unsuccessful. SpinRite would access the hard disks, but not the memory
> stick.
> They reimbursed - no questions asked.
Spi
Hello Jernej,
On Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 11:16:30 PM, which was 8:06:40 AM
where I am, you wrote:
JS> On Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 23:07:21, Chris wrote:
>> You probably don't want to here this, but you hard drive may be bad.
>> After you recover the messages, I'd back everything up and run
>>
On Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 23:07:21, Chris wrote:
> You probably don't want to here this, but you hard drive may be bad.
> After you recover the messages, I'd back everything up and run
> something like SpinRite on the drive.
Err, SpinRite is a scam, don't use it.
What might work is the disk di
Miles Johnson @ 2006-5-31 11:24:32 AM
"Bad crash... HELP!"
> I've got some really important mail in those folders... Is there any way I
> can get TB to recognize and "see" its own files?!
> HELP!
You probably don't want to here this, but you hard
Hallo Miles,
On Wed, 31 May 2006 11:24:32 -0400GMT (31-5-2006, 17:24 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P> Once I rebooted I discovered that the main inbox folders for my first four
P> accounts as well as, oddly, the outbox for account #2 only, contain 0
P> message. All sub-folders are intact. I ha
Running XP Pro here... worse crash I've ever had with this OS. This morning
my PC locked up repeatedly and before things got really bad I was able to
determine that it was Diskeeper that was locking up as it was defragging
some drives in the background (never done that before) I tried to kil
Hallo Dean,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 01:20:23 -0600GMT (14-3-2006, 8:20 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
D> After a recent crash of the system and having to reload the OS -
D> Win 2k, I tried to restore the old fashioned way by copying the TBB
D> and TBI into the newly created Accounts.
My
Thank you for your suggestions. It was easy to identifiy the account
which causes the problem. I deleted several files, like *.tbi, but
nothing helped.
I saw that some ppl use the 3.60.02 BETA version. That version works
again.
Jörn Bodemann
--
Hello Quin,
> Notice I said in my first line that my copy of The Bat! *reports* to
> be 3.0. This is because I've repeatedly copied 3.0.0.11 over my
> version 3.0. At first, TB! reports v.3.0.0.11 in About but it reverts
> to 3.0 when I close and restart The Bat!.
Are you aware that v.3.0.0.11 is
Hello tbudl,
This has happened several times now, using what reports to be v.3.0:
When working in Sorting Office, I use ALT + Left Click to drag a
(usually newly created?) folder in the left pane to a new position.
The sorting office entries then speed by uncontrollably until an
access violatio
Hello Jeff,
On Friday, September 3, 2004, 10:12:56 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Roelof,
[snipped]
> The long term answer would be for Ritlabs to keep TB!'s settings in an
> ini file instead of the registry - I think MS have been recommending
> for a couple of years that application specific settings
Hello Denis,
Sunday, September 5, 2004, 5:31:15 PM, you wrote:
>> (c) MS started to recommend individual configuration files some time
>> back,
Back to the old days where .ini was more common.
The problem is that the .ini files are not always in the most logical
place either.
> If only they di
> (c) MS started to recommend individual configuration files some time
> back, surely we all do what MS says without question ;-)
If only they did it themselves! Do what I say, but not what I do...
And more than that... their apps settings are scattered a bit
everywhere in the Registry. I think t
Saturday, September 4, 2004, 2:13:09 AM, you wrote:
JG> (a) Anybody who touches *my* computer gets their
JG> fingers chopped off!
rotfl! That's my position :-)
Lynn
TBv.2.12.00
NT5 SP4
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* * *Aun Aprendo
I'd rather be WARP'ed* * * Team OS/2
http://www.turri
Saturday, September 4, 2004, 1:44:32 AM, you wrote:
>> It would certainly be a godsend if they'd all do
>> that; I had to reload
>> the system recently, too, but I am a *long* way
>> from getting my apps
>> all reinstalled .. and as you say, they are all
>> sitting intact on the
>> D partition, b
Hello Jeff,
On Friday, September 3, 2004, 12:48:26 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Roelof,
> On Friday, September 3, 2004, 11:39:38 AM, you wrote:
>> Hallo Jeff,
>> On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:12:56 +0100GMT (3-9-2004, 11:12 +0200, where I
>> live), you wrote:
JG>>> I have been following this thread with so
Hello MAU,
On Saturday, September 4, 2004, 9:44:32 AM, you wrote:
> Hello Lynn,
JG>>> Agent does this and, since I keep all my 'well behaved' apps on the
JG>>> D: drive, after an OS re-install they are all available for
JG>>> immediate use, since they don't need any registry settings to work.
>>
Hello Lynn,
JG>> Agent does this and, since I keep all my 'well behaved' apps on the
JG>> D: drive, after an OS re-install they are all available for
JG>> immediate use, since they don't need any registry settings to work.
>
> It would certainly be a godsend if they'd all do that; I had to reload
Friday, September 3, 2004, 2:12:56 AM, you wrote:
JG> Agent does this and, since I keep all my 'well
JG> behaved' apps on the D:
JG> drive, after an OS re-install they are all available
JG> for immediate
JG> use, since they don't need any registry settings to
JG> work.
It would certainly be a g
Hello MAU,
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 2:49:52 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Tony,
>> The problem is that I need to reinstall TB! also.
>> How can I restore my old settings and messages?
>> I still have *all* files but never made a backup with the option found
>> in TB!
>>
>> Any help would be most w
Hello thebat,
Friday, September 3, 2004, 2:54:33 AM, you wrote:
> Hi,
>>> It's been awhile since I used Ghost, but wasn't it possible to read
>>> those images like they drives themselves?
>> Correct. But because the new hardware windows refused to boot.
>> (drivers problems etc) So I had to rei
Hello Roelof,
On Friday, September 3, 2004, 11:39:38 AM, you wrote:
> Hallo Jeff,
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:12:56 +0100GMT (3-9-2004, 11:12 +0200, where I
> live), you wrote:
JG>> I have been following this thread with some interest as I have to do a
JG>> re-install of XP soon.
JG>> The long ter
Hallo Jeff,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:12:56 +0100GMT (3-9-2004, 11:12 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JG> I have been following this thread with some interest as I have to do a
JG> re-install of XP soon.
JG> The long term answer would be for Ritlabs to keep TB!'s settings in an
JG> ini file instead
Hi,
>> It's been awhile since I used Ghost, but wasn't it possible to read
>> those images like they drives themselves?
> Correct. But because the new hardware windows refused to boot.
> (drivers problems etc) So I had to reinstall windows. The repair
> windows option didn't work either. So Ghost
Hello Roelof,
On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 11:40:19 PM, you wrote:
> Hallo Lynn,
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:23:01 -0700GMT (3-9-2004, 0:23 +0200, where I
> live), you wrote:
L>> However, do you know how I can recover my message base on
L>> a new installation? I have the old folder files stashed
Hello Roelof,
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 2:55:16 PM, you wrote:
> Hallo Tony,
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:19:39 -0700GMT (3-9-2004, 7:19 +0200, where I
> live), you wrote:
T>> The problem is that I need to reinstall TB! also.
T>> How can I restore my old settings and messages?
T>> I still have *a
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 5:04:39 PM, you wrote:
Again, sorry ... I fatfingered something ...
RO> Tinker to your liking. ;-) I'd suggest that you
RO> replace the new account.* files for the old ones (they
RO> contain your filters, account settings, folder
RO> settings, quick templates) save t
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 5:04:39 PM, you wrote:
RO> Tinker to your liking. ;-)
You may be sure I will .. lol!
RO> I'd suggest that you replace the new account.* files
RO> for the old ones (they contain your filters, account
RO> settings, folder settings, quick templates) save the
RO> new on
Hallo Lynn,
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:55:32 -0700GMT (3-9-2004, 1:55 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO>> Another option would be to create a new account, close
RO>> TB and copy your old account files (including
RO>> everything) to the new directory, but that's bound to
RO>> return your same corrupt
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 4:47:31 PM, you wrote:
RO> Another option would be to create a new account, close
RO> TB and copy your old account files (including
RO> everything) to the new directory, but that's bound to
RO> return your same corruption.
That's what I'm afraid of .. and the deinsta
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 4:09:25 PM, you wrote:
M> Do you want to keep your message base on the
M> "different drive"? I'm
M> going to assume that yes. And I am going to assume it
M> is in:
Actually, my current message base is on a 'd' partition,
but when I deinstalled, I shifted all the mai
Hallo Lynn,
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:36:29 -0700GMT (3-9-2004, 1:36 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
L> Yes, that's what I did. It was very inconsistent; it
L> recovered some of them, but not others.
That's because the messagebases that didn't import very well were
corrupted.
L> I'll keep the old
Hallo MAU,
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 01:11:01 +0200GMT (3-9-2004, 1:11 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
>> Select one of your folders
>> Tools -> Import messages -> From TB message base -> Browse to your
>> old folder corresponding with your current one, select the
>> messages.tbb file and you're
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 3:40:19 PM, you wrote:
RO> Tools -> Import messages -> From TB message
base ->> Browse to your
RO> old folder corresponding with your current one, select
RO> the messages.tbb file and you're importing. Do this
RO> for all of your folders
Yes, that's what I did. It
Hello MAU,
>> Select one of your folders
>> Tools -> Import messages -> From TB message base -> Browse to your
>> old folder corresponding with your current one, select the
>> messages.tbb file and you're importing.
>> Do this for all of your folders
>
> That works, but what about templates
Hello Roelof,
> Select one of your folders
> Tools -> Import messages -> From TB message base -> Browse to your
> old folder corresponding with your current one, select the
> messages.tbb file and you're importing.
> Do this for all of your folders
That works, but what about templates, addr
Hello Lynn,
> However, do you know how I can recover my message base on
> a new installation? I have the old folder files stashed on
> a different drive;
Do you want to keep your message base on the "different drive"? I'm
going to assume that yes. And I am going to assume it is in:
E:\TB\Mai
Hallo Lynn,
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:23:01 -0700GMT (3-9-2004, 0:23 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
L> However, do you know how I can recover my message base on
L> a new installation? I have the old folder files stashed on
L> a different drive; I didn't use the backup/recover option
L> because ther
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 2:49:52 PM, you wrote:
M> I have done this a couple of times in the past and I
M> had no problem.
I've done this too, and it works fine.
However, do you know how I can recover my message base on
a new installation? I have the old folder files stashed on
a different
Hallo Tony,
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:19:39 -0700GMT (3-9-2004, 7:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
T> The problem is that I need to reinstall TB! also.
T> How can I restore my old settings and messages?
T> I still have *all* files but never made a backup with the option found
T> in TB!
That's why
Hello Tony,
> The problem is that I need to reinstall TB! also.
> How can I restore my old settings and messages?
> I still have *all* files but never made a backup with the option found
> in TB!
>
> Any help would be most welcome!
No big problem, I think.
I am assuming that you have your old f
Hello tbudl,
Last week I my PC failed to boot and had to buy new hardware.
I use Ghost to make all my backups and it usally works fine.
But not this time due to the diffrent hardware windows needed a
complete reinstall.
The problem is that I need to reinstall TB! also.
How can I restore my old se
Hello Paul,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 16:17:06 -0500 GMT (26/02/2004, 04:17 +0700 GMT),
Paul Cartwright wrote:
> Please Visit This Week's Sponsor Below
Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 7:25 PM, you wrote:
rg>> What do ALT-0 & ALT-1 do?
AW> It toggles between non-threaded view and thread by references.
MAN, DON'T DO that to me!!!
I decided to try that, and hit ALT-0. WOW! that scared me to death!!!
that was a totally different look, with no
On Thursday, February 26, 2004, 12:55 PM, you wrote:
>> Please Visit This Week's Sponsor Below
TF> Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam.
my apologies!
the discussion was on searching, using "&", and I made the test on
chicken&soup vs chicken &
Hello Paul,
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:13:04 -0500 GMT (27/02/2004, 01:13 +0700 GMT),
Paul Cartwright wrote:
TF>> Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam.
> my apologies!
Let me think about it...
> sorry!
OK, I forgive you!
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Ba
On Thursday, February 26, 2004, 1:25 PM, you wrote:
TF>>> Thank you for posting in its entirety what I consider spam.
>> my apologies!
TF> Let me think about it...
>> sorry!
TF> OK, I forgive you!
that's why you moderators are so well liked!
--
Paul
Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows X
Hello Paul,
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:44:38 -0500 GMT (27/02/2004, 01:44 +0700 GMT),
Paul Cartwright wrote:
> that's why you moderators are so well liked!
I'm not a moderator on this list... but thanks anyway. :-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
I drive way
Hello rich,
rg> What do ALT-0 & ALT-1 do?
It toggles between non-threaded view and thread by references.
--
Cheers,
Andre
"L'homme est né libre,
et partout il est dans les fers."
Current version is 2.04.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 5:44 PM, you wrote:
M> Hello Paul,
>> Subject: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4
M> Thanks for changing the subject :-)
I remember a potato subject, not too long ago, that went totally off the
deep end;) I like it w
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 5:37 PM, you wrote:
R> I ran some tests here & I came up with this:
R> * searching for 'chicken&soup' will search for messages that will have
R> both 'chicken' and 'soup' in it
R> * searching for 'chicken & soup' will search for messages that will
R> have bo
Hello Paul,
> Subject: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4
Thanks for changing the subject :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.04.7
Current version is 2.04.04 |
Hi Paul
On 25 Feb 2004 16:17:06 (my local time 22:17:06), Paul Cartwright
wrote:
PC> 18 messages using chicken&soup
PC> 17 using chicken & soup.
PC> here is the extra message using chicken&soup,verbatim, I have no idea
PC> what the difference is. The other 17 emails were the same for both
PC> s
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 5:29 PM, you wrote:
rg> Right, but there's still the fact that we cannot assign search term W
rg> to being ONLY in the field X AND search term Y restricted to the field
rg> Z.
you are correct, I never really thought about that. The "advanced"
search mode, is a
rg Seriously, 2 words does not a complex search make. If I need to
rg *RELIABLY* find the email where I invited JANIS to the DANCE (only
rg want emails where BOTH those words exist):
PC>>> personally, I'd probably do the search differently. Either just on
PC>>> JANIS, or use the FROM:,
>> This is the root question then! What is the difference between the 2
>> versions (with vs w/o spaces around the &) of the search syntax?
> ok, I did a test again for you, same results ( wow!)
> 18 messages using chicken&soup
> 17 using chicken & soup.
I just did some quick experimenting with t
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 3:50 PM, you wrote:
rg> At this point I need to make sure that you (and everyone else) know
rg> that I am NOT "attacking" in seeking the answers to this question.
rg> Though my fictitious example may be lame, the question (I think)
rg> deserves a definitive answ
At this point I need to make sure that you (and everyone else) know
that I am NOT "attacking" in seeking the answers to this question.
Though my fictitious example may be lame, the question (I think)
deserves a definitive answer (not necessarily by you, of course). I
only seek the truth!
rg>> Seri
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 10:56 AM, you wrote:
rg> HEY! That's GREAT! You've volunteered to write informix queries for my
rg> email searches then!!
been 10 years since I've written any Informix reports, I like to keep
things simple these days, although using TB is making my life comple
Tuesday, February 24, 2004, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
> the new build 2.04.7
Oh no, not another build...
You are far too supportive for us poor modem users. Why don't you just
start saying that every new release contains "surprise new features"
like some other software companies I have heard of.
:-
Search for:
rgchicken&soup
PC>>> searched using that method, found 18 messages
rg chicken & soup
PC>>> searched using this method found 17 messages...
rg>> Brings up more questions than it answered for me!
PC> the answer is simple:) keep the searches to one word;0) I've never
PC> re
Searching for:
rgchicken&soup
PC>>> searched using that method, found 18 messages
rg chicken & soup
PC>>> searched using this method found 17 messages...
dh> To confuse even more, sometimes I see less messages in the result
dh> list than are "counted" as result in the statusline.
On Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 8:30 PM, you wrote:
rg>>>chicken&soup
PC>> searched using that method, found 18 messages
rg>>> but the newer version works with
rg>>> chicken & soup
PC>> searched using this method found 17 messages...
rg> Brings up more questions than it answered for me
On Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 8:45 PM, you wrote:
>>>chicken&soup
>> searched using that method, found 18 messages
>>> but the newer version works with
>>> chicken & soup
>> searched using this method found 17 messages...
C> The second one is probably searching for "chicken " AND " sou
Hello rich,
on Tue, 24. Feb 2004 at 20:30:17 -0500 you wrote:
rg>>> I *think* various versions of TB! expect the search term to be entered
rg>>> differently... My earlier version wanted
rg>>>chicken&soup
PC>> searched using that method, found 18 messages
rg>>> but the newer version works
Paul Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ 24-Feb-2004 4:10:15 PM
"Crash on Search in 2.04.4" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>chicken&soup
> searched using that method, found 18 messages
>> but the newer version works with
>> chicken & soup
&g
rg>> I *think* various versions of TB! expect the search term to be entered
rg>> differently... My earlier version wanted
rg>>chicken&soup
PC> searched using that method, found 18 messages
rg>> but the newer version works with
rg>> chicken & soup
PC> searched using this method found 17
On Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 12:48 PM, you wrote:
E>> I have never had luck searching for more than one word, but
E>> the search mechanism works fine (through single or multiple
E>> folders).
rg> I *think* various versions of TB! expect the search term to be entered
rg> differently... My
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo