Hello Jeroen,
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 3:32:47 AM you wrote (at least in
part):
RO Try to delete the password (or the group) at: Options - Network admin
J Yes, but he cannot access the Bat anymore. :-( He needs the login/password
J for that. Is there a way to delete passwords with
Hello Jeroen,
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 03:32:47 +0200GMT (24-4-02, 3:32 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
RO Try to delete the password (or the group) at: Options - Network admin
J Yes, but he cannot access the Bat anymore. :-( He needs the login/password
J for that.
The easiest way to mess
Hello Greg,
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:28:10 -0500GMT (24-4-02, 5:28 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
GS I can't get an outgoing mail filter to work and I don't know why. I'll
Maybe your messages trigger another filter first, that means that they
won't be tested against other criteria, unless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Strong [GS] wrote:
...
GS Don't you mean SmartBat? See Tools | SmartBat (or F6)
Yes, that's what he meant.
- --
- -=Allie C Martin=-[List Moderator]
PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Greg,
@24 April 2002, 23:04:40 -0500 (05:04 UK time) Greg Strong wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't you mean SmartBat? See Tools | SmartBat (or F6)
Yes - it was known (and referred to) as SmartPad during development
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
@24 April 2002, 05:51:03 +0100 David Elliott wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP SmartPad was produced in response to those who actually like the
MDP TB editor and wanted to use it (and access Quick Templates) in a
MDP
Another question about images in HTML
Earlier versions of the bat! stored ALL images separately in Attach
folder. (may be because they didn't fully support html)
Now some messages are store in the attach folder, BUT some images
inserted in html are stored in message.tbb. This is not convenient
I've mentioned some strange behaviors of the v.1.61c
1) When you write new message and attach a file, this file is copied
to Attach folder. This is bad, baut even worse because
2) when you delete a message with attachments, these attachments are
not deleted from the attach folder. (even after
I did try importing the messages into OE as one other user suggested,
but TB is unable to find my OE message store.
I had exactly the same problem - both with outlook and outlook
express. I got around it by dragging the messages I wanted to import
out of OE into a folder (they get saved as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Vlad,
@24 April 2002, 12:17:49 +0400 (09:17 UK time) Vlad wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've mentioned some strange behaviors of the v.1.61c
ROFLOL!
Vlad! I can't believe you just did that *on this thread*!!! Just when
24.04.2002, you wrote:
Hi Vlad,
@24 April 2002, 12:17:49 +0400 (09:17 UK time) Vlad wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've mentioned some strange behaviors of the v.1.61c
ROFLOL!
keep doing it. Rolling and Laughing is good for health.
Vlad! I can't believe you just did
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 10:14:35 AM, Simon wrote:
I had exactly the same problem - both with outlook and outlook
express. I got around it by dragging the messages I wanted to import
out of OE into a folder (they get saved as .EML files). I could then
use TB to import them - the
I've mentioned some strange behaviors of the v.1.61c
1) When you write new message and attach a file, this file is copied
to Attach folder. This is bad, baut even worse because
2) when you delete a message with attachments, these attachments are
not deleted from the attach folder. (even after
Hello Listers,
A lot of years ago, I used some kind of M$ program to manage my
e-mail. (I do not remember if it was Outlook, O. Express, Internet
Mail or Exchange)
My mails were stored in .pst and .pab files.
Now, I need some messages from this .pst/.pab files. I thought this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, at 21:52:55 +0200 Roelof wrote:
J My father has the Bat version 1.53d. The following problem occurs;
J shortly after the splash screen the Bat asks for a name and a
J password. My father cannot use therefore the emailclient. As
Hi,
with the growing popularity of the Bat! the readership (and 'postership')
of TBUDL also grows.
Does the welcome message for subscribers mention some Bat specific
settings for dealing with the list (e.g. threading settings, filtering
list traffic, the danger of folder templates)? I've been
Hi,
Andrew Henderson wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
No associations were changed so it is a relief to know that I don't have
to do any digging to get rid of The Bat.
One last thing (am I really helping somebody here to get rid of the Bat?
ah, well): you might check if the Bat! is
Hello Vlad!
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 11:18:53 AM you wrote:
1) When you write new message and attach a file, this file is copied
to Attach folder. This is bad, baut even worse because
Have a look under Account/Properties/Files Directories ...
Most people here seem to leave
Dear group,
I am hoping you will be able to help me with a problem I am having with
the viewer in The Bat! After opening The Bat! and viewing a couple of
HTML messages, the viewer freezers and will refuse to show any non-text
emails. There is simply a white space where the content should be and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Gloede [MG] wrote:
...
MG Does the welcome message for subscribers mention some Bat specific
MG settings for dealing with the list (e.g. threading settings, filtering
MG list traffic, the danger of folder templates)? I've been on the list for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote:
...
DH Be advised to *not* use the Bind attachments while sending
DH together with Delete attachment when message is deleted from
DH Trash as then you'll lose files.
Wow! I would count that as a show-stopper problem. :-( The
Hallo Chema,
Op woensdag 24-04-02 (11:34) schreef je me:
CB Hello Listers,
CB A lot of years ago, I used some kind of M$ program to manage my
CB e-mail. (I do not remember if it was Outlook, O. Express, Internet
CB Mail or Exchange)
CB My mails were stored in .pst and .pab
Markus Gloede wrote:
One last thing (am I really helping somebody here to get rid of the Bat?
ah, well): you might check if the Bat! is currently known to your system
as default mail handler/MAPI request recipient. Sorry, I can only tell you
how to check this from MS IE, so you have to look
Hello list,
I've set up a number of Accounts in TheBat!, a few of which were
designed to collect mail from places like Yahoo which no longer
allow free POP access and forwarding.
I don't want to delete those Accounts as such - I've still got
messages there I previously downloaded -,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fré Van Limpt [FVL] wrote:
...
FVL Couldn't you try to export them first into a LDIF file and after
FVL that import that file into TB! as LDIF file as well? Stefan
FVL advised me to do so with my Netscape 4.76 address books and it
FVL worked out just
Hi tbudl people
Very curious ... I have installed the latest version '1.60g' TB! and
since then I have had 5 messages to different people come back with
the following basic message, for example:
From: System Administrator SystemAdministrator
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Failed Mail
Sender:
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 14:17, myob wrote:
I don't want to delete those Accounts as such - I've still got
messages there I previously downloaded -, but I would like to find
a way picking up mail from all (and only) my other ISP accounts
using something as simple as Alt+F2 or
Hello Dave,
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 2:40:57 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
DC Recipient '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in message 'Food receipts' cannot be sent
DC to. The reply given by the service provider was '550 relaying to
DC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello myob!
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 2:17:00 PM you wrote:
Is there an easy way of doing that, please?
For any account you can define Ignore global Receive The
default is not to ignore. so, you just go to your disabled accounts
and check ignore. That's what I actually do for one
Hello Chema,
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 11:34:24 AM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
CB Can I import .pst/.pab files w/o reinstalling O/OE?
1.) .pst is only Outlook, OE will be no help when importing these message.
2.) No, you can't :-( At least
Hello Dave,
Any e-mail geniuses able to figure this out?
Last official release is 1.60c and your question refers to version
1.60g.
Please do not confuse the average TBDUL user and take this
question/issue to the TBBeta list.
Thank you.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -
Hello Listers,
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, at 13:57:44 [GMT +0200] Fré wrote message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and made this comments:
FvL Couldn't you try to export them first into a LDIF file and after
FvL that import that file into TB! as LDIF file as well?
What can I use
Hello Miguel!
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 3:46:01 PM you wrote:
Last official release is 1.60c and your question refers to version
1.60g.
Seems to be the Issue of the Week, hosted by Tom Brokaw.
Any 1.60 version after RC2 are official. Currently there is no beta -
at least not an
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 8:40:57 AM, you wrote:
DC Recipient '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in message 'Food receipts' cannot be sent to. The
reply given by the service
DC provider was '550 relaying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] prohibited by administrator
DC '.
I'd email the postmaster at impro and see what
Hello Dierk,
Any 1.60 version after RC2 are official. Currently there is no beta -
at least not an external one.
No, unless RITLabs is loosing all respect for their existing client
base. Take a look at their site and to the list footer of any message
on this list:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, at 15:46:01 +0200 Miguel wrote:
MAU Please do not confuse the average TBDUL user and take this
MAU question/issue to the TBBeta list.
With a deep respect, there is no average TB user. Average users
doesn't use TB. And beta
Hello Miguel!
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 4:28:32 PM you wrote:
No, unless RITLabs is loosing all respect for their existing client
base. Take a look at their site and to the list footer of any message
on this list:
The list is supported by RITLabs, but by no means their list. So,
Hello Chema!
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 3:57:11 PM you wrote:
What can I use to export? I don't have any email client from Microsoft
installed.
a test version of Mailbag Assistant? Or any other such programme that
is freeware or has a testing period?
--
Dierk Haasis
Hello Chema,
Op woensdag 24-04-02 (15:57) schreef je me:
CB What can I use to export? I don't have any email client
from Microsoft CB installed.
In that case i couldn't help you i'm afraid. You could install
Microgates temporarily, let him do your jobsend him
(friendly) away. Good
Hello Mandara,
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 9:33:17 AM, you wrote:
M With a deep respect, there is no average TB user. Average users
M doesn't use TB. And beta versions have beta sufix. Dave's one is
M just g[ee] one.
With all due respect apparently the users who post to the TBBETA list
don't
Hello list members,
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 5:02:49 PM Dierk wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
DH Why RITLabs hasn't chosen g (or for that matter z) to be the
DH official download, I don't know. Perhaps Maxim or Stefan knows.
To makes this thing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
@24 April 2002, 17:02:49 +0200 (16:02 UK time) Dierk Haasis wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The list is supported by RITLabs, but by no means their list. So,
whatever is in the list footer, RITLabs is not responsible.
Hello Ben,
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 4:17:13 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
DC Recipient '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in message 'Food receipts' cannot be sent to. The
reply given by the service
DC provider was '550 relaying to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Dave Conroy,
On Wednesday, April 24 2002 at 05:40 AM PDT, you wrote:
Very curious ... I have installed the latest version '1.60g' TB! and
since then I have had 5 messages to different people come back with
the following basic message, for example:
From: System Administrator
PP 'Always encrypt to default key'
PP This should encrypt every message to _your_ key too and you should be able
PP to re-read them.
Okay, but this way I still can't save them in clear text in my sent
folder automatically, right?
Guti
Hello Peter,
To makes this thing clear here too:
1.60g _IS_ an official release.
Sorry Peter, but I don't know who you are to make that statement. And
your statement is a valid as mine if I say that it _IS _NOT_.
Aside of that, even if I knew who Peter Palmreuther is, you are not
PGP
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 1:50:16 PM, Marcus wrote in response to my
query:
I don't want to delete those Accounts as such - but I would like to
find a way picking up mail from all (and only) my other ISP
accounts
MO Check Ignore 'check all accounts' request for the those accounts.
MO You
Hello Carsten,
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 6:12:00 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
PP 'Always encrypt to default key'
PP This should encrypt every message to _your_ key too and you should be able
PP to re-read them.
CGS Okay, but this way I
Hello Carsten!
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 6:12:00 PM you wrote:
Okay, but this way I still can't save them in clear text in my sent
folder automatically, right?
No. But that's actually the point of encryption, to *not* have a clear
text somewhere. If you want to retain the message in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, at 10:38:58 -0500 Greg wrote:
M With a deep respect, there is no average TB user. Average users
M doesn't use TB. And beta versions have beta sufix. Dave's one is
M just g[ee] one.
GS With all due respect apparently the users
Hello Dierk,
As for the respect. I use a version that can not be downloaded
directly from RITLabs' site because it has one or two fixes which are
only needed under certain circumstances (something to do with PGP,
particularly CKT). If one doesn't have a problem one won't ask for it
and may
Hello Carsten Guthardt-Schulz,
On Wednesday, April 24 2002 at 09:12 AM PDT, you wrote:
Okay, but this way I still can't save them in clear text in my sent
folder automatically, right?
Well no because you did not send it in clear text... you sent it encrypted,
so quite rightfully it is kept
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Miguel,
@24 April 2002, 18:27:05 +0200 (17:27 UK time) Miguel A. Urech wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is CKT PGP the only thing broken in 1.60c?
Nothing was broken. Imad Faiad (the person who produces the ckt builds
of PGP)
Hello Miguel,
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 11:19:01 AM, you wrote:
MAU Sorry Peter, but I don't know who you are to make that statement.
MAU And your statement is a valid as mine if I say that it _IS _NOT_.
MAU Aside of that, even if I knew who Peter Palmreuther is, you are
MAU not PGP signing
Hello Mandara,
I'm always ready to change my opinion...
Only wise men are ready to change their opinion. :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ:
How come when I try to view threads by reference on other mailing
lists it doesn't turn out nearly as nice as the threads do on this
list? I've even tried viewing by subject which is better usually but
still not perfect (you lose the original subject plus if you do re[2]
or whatever it changes
Hello Miguel,
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 6:19:01 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
1.60g _IS_ an official release.
MAU Sorry Peter, but I don't know who you are to make that statement. And
MAU your statement is a valid as mine if I say that it
Hello Marck,
snipped quite a bit
I don't think we're missing very much being stuck with 'c' (or 'd' in
the case of ckt testers).
Thanks for your explanations Marck (and I know you're Marck because of
your PGP sig ;-)
I know I (we) are not missing much by not upgrading. Actually, I
usually
Hello Rick,
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:58:57 -0400GMT (24-4-02, 18:58 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
RR How come when I try to view threads by reference on other mailing
RR lists it doesn't turn out nearly as nice as the threads do on this
RR list?
That's because not all email clients support
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 3:19:45 AM, you wrote:
RO Good hunting.
I recalled reading somewhere in help about the thread syntax, but
couldn't find it. Your message was a good example. Is there a way to
export the Account | Sorting Office/Filters text? The copy paste was
Hello all,
I know this may be SOT but, anyway, here it goes.
The fact that I am one of those that, more or less seriously or
joking, every now and then complains about the use of PGP signatures
in this list, does not mean that I don't understand the usefulness and
even need of PGP or S/MIME
Hello Peter,
snipped
Quite correct ... you're a good observer ...
snipped
Nevertheless ... just for the case we meet some day and you are willing and
able to verify my S/MIME-serial I'll (aberrantly) sign this mail :-)
First, I hope you noticed the ;-) in my message :)
Yeap, your sig shows
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 5:40:57 AM, Dave Conroy wrote:
Very curious ... I have installed the latest version '1.60g' TB! and
since then I have had 5 messages to different people come back with
the following basic message, for example:
From: System Administrator SystemAdministrator
Hello Nick,
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 11:14:02 AM, you wrote:
Okay, but this way I still can't save them in clear text in my sent
folder automatically, right?
NA Well no because you did not send it in clear text... you sent it
NA encrypted, so quite rightfully it is kept encrypted in your
Hello Greg,
ROFLMAO :þ)
Now you got me here. Up to the L I understand, but what does MAO stand
for?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ:
Hello Matt,
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 7:09:49 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
MT Most mail servers don't allow relaying so if you're not using the smtp
MT server designated by your ISP, this is the message you will see. I
MT suspect the upgrade
Hello Miguel!
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 6:13:36 PM you wrote:
And second, and whether you like it or not, when there is 2 or more
of something (TB or TBUDL users in this case), there is always_ and
_average_.
If we are going nitpicking: Even with only *one* user there would be
an
Hello Miguel,
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 7:31:50 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
MAU First, I hope you noticed the ;-) in my message :)
I did :-)
MAU Yeap, your sig shows green, so that is you. Or at least the same you
MAU that some other
Hello Mandara,
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 11:27:50 AM, you wrote:
M My deep apologies to all if I said anything incorrect above. Off
M course I'll have nothing against if I said correct things. Also I
M am ready to take any responsibility if I said anything partially
M [in]correct. I'm always
Hello Miguel,
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 7:25:38 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
ROFLMAO :þ)
MAU Now you got me here. Up to the L I understand, but what does MAO stand
MAU for?
ROTFL My Ass Off
^ ^ ^
:-) And this is even unsigned the
Hello Peter,
Correct ... I'm the same one how proved to two 'Thawte notary' his
identity, otherwise my name wouldn't show up in the certificate as for
Thawte-rules :-)
I have Thawte's Step-byStep Guide to Personal Certificate System
Enrolment on top of my desk. :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel
Hello Dierk,
nitpicking
Hey! My new Spanish-English-Spanish dictionary works! Just double
click on the word and I get the translation(s) and explanations on a
drop down from TB's (or any other application) title bar. Only problem
with Tb is that the dictionary engine also docks next to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Miguel,
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 12:25:38 PM, you wrote:
ROFLMAO :þ)
MAU Now you got me here. Up to the L I understand, but what does MAO
MAU stand for?
Rolling On Floor Laughing My Ass Off
I miss VA's free acronym plugin, so if you
Hello Greg,
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:09:35 -0500GMT (24-4-02, 19:09 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
GS Is there a way to export the Account | Sorting Office/Filters
GS text?
Yes, it can be done. In rather cumbersome way. :-(
Select a filter, press Ctrl-C (not the copy button, that has a
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 1:31:17 PM, you wrote:
GS The copy paste was incredibly easy.
Not when you're trying to export lots of filters. ;-)
You can select multiple filters and copy them in one operation, and
paste them all as one (including into The Bat!).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Miguel,
@24 April 2002, 19:18:00 +0200 (18:18 UK time) Miguel A. Urech wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any quick and brief explanation/opinion will be appreciated.
S/MIME tends to be simpler all round, but getting a
Hallo,
is there a way to define properties for a group of folders?
Also, a handle like %abtogroup would be useful, to tell which group an
address book entry belongs to.
Daniel
Current Ver: 1.60c
FAQ:
Hello Miguel!
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 7:18:00 PM you wrote:
Any quick and brief explanation/opinion will be appreciated.
The difference between use of S/MIME and PGP is a conceptual one.
S/MIME relies on a centralised signer (certificate issuer), PGP relies
completely on what Phil
Hello Miguel!
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 at 7:51:15 PM you wrote:
nitpicking
Liked your comment, answer is on TBOT.
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo
PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys
The Bat 1.60g on Windows 95 4.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, at 18:59:40 +0200 Miguel wrote:
I'm always ready to change my opinion...
MAU Only wise men are ready to change their opinion. :-)
I'm always ready to change my opinion if is not in tune with
reality.
My full quotation, just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, at 18:13:36 +0200 Miguel wrote:
With a deep respect, there is no average TB user.
MAU Also with deep respect.
Yep. Accepted this way.
MAU First, I didn't say average TB user nut average TBUDL user,
MAU which is different.
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 11:54:57 AM, you wrote:
I use www.dnsstuff.com for a bunch of reasons. It has a lot of great
tools.
Here's the URL to the span database lookup for his ISP's server:
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=194.73.73.92 .
You can go back to www.dnsstuff.com and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Strong [GS] wrote:
...
NA Well no because you did not send it in clear text... you sent it
NA encrypted, so quite rightfully it is kept encrypted in your Sent
NA Items Folder... exactly the way you sent it. Always encrypting to
NA your default
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Totman [MT] wrote:
...
MT You can select multiple filters and copy them in one operation,
MT and paste them all as one (including into The Bat!).
Really? How? I just tried selecting multiple filter rules and can't.
- --
- -=Allie C Martin=-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miguel A. Urech [MAU] wrote:
...
MAU I am considering using PGP or S/MIME for some business
MAU correspondence (obviously with TB) and, perhaps because I have
MAU not read enough about either, it is not clear to me what are the
MAU advantages and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 4:21:28 PM, you wrote:
Really? How? I just tried selecting multiple filter rules and can't.
Sorry, I retract that statement. I thought I remembered doing that, but
I must have been thinking of something else. You're
HI!
Carter:
-
Cartermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
March 04, 2002, 8:56:23 PM, you wrote:
[snipped]
HI! tbudl:
I know I'll be slapping my forehead when I get the right answer but
here goes...
When I reply to a message and I want to delete part of the
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, 10:24:19 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
I've to correct that statement, albeit the 'guess' seems logical it can't
be correct in this case, because:
If he'd be using / contacting a mail server that does not allow relaying from
his IP address he'd not even be able
There has been numerous inquiries to sync'ing the palm with the Bat
Address book. I propose that we begin a campaign to contact
Intellisync to write a conduit to The Bat! They already have pipes
to a number of popular contact management apps, perhaps they could
add TB! to their list.
89 matches
Mail list logo
