Message Archives

2001-10-31 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, tbudl. I know this has been discussed before, but I have lost a lot of my old messages and searching is difficult in the Web-based archives. So I hope you won't mind if I ask again: What good methods have you all found for storing your old messages? I know some of you just del

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Gary
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:59:37AM +0530 or thereabouts, Raj wrote: > G> TB does have the ability for notations within a message > (shft+cntl+i) > > Another feature I would like to see (Incl the ability to edit > incoming mail) would be for the memo field to support Macros / QT's Now there is

Re[3]: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Raj
Gary, On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, at 13:27:53 [GMT -0600] (which was 00:57 where I live) you wrote: G> TB does have the ability for notations within a message (shft+cntl+i) Another feature I would like to see (Incl the ability to edit incoming mail) would be for the memo field to support Macros / QT

Re[2]: PGP - config.problem

2001-10-31 Thread Han Thomas
Hello Allie, Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 7:16:23 PM, you wrote: HT>> Yes... I will.. but PGP has been under development for decades. HT>> SecureBat is very promising, but it is new. There will be HT>> weaknesses. So even with SecureBat I'd probably still install it HT>> on a PGP-Disk. ACM> So

Re[2]: TB! and Windows Explorer

2001-10-31 Thread Carren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday, November 01, 2001, 11:02:21 AM, Allie wrote: ACM> TB! seems to keep up here at my end. If the changes aren't being ACM> reflected in Explorer then it's TB!'s fault. Just as an after thought. One of my accounts currently has *no* messa

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 @ 16:49:47 -0600 [ Wed, 31 Oct 2001], Gary [G] wrote these words of wisdom: ... A>> Heh! Too easy. The 'e' and 'r' keys are too close for comfort. :-) A>> Mistakes can easily be made. G> Okay, okay *however* then one can make use of key remapping

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 @ 16:21:47 -0600 [ Wed, 31 Oct 2001], Dwight A Corrin [DAC] thoughtfully wrote the following: ... DAC> It also changes the creation date, and it looks like maybe the DAC> received date as well. Where does that put it in threading? Yes, these are chan

Re[2]: TB! and Windows Explorer

2001-10-31 Thread Carren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thursday, November 01, 2001, 11:02:21 AM, Allie wrote: ACM> But hold on. If you move folders around in TB!, it *will* break ACM> any shortcuts that you may have created in Mailbag Assistant, ACM> since the shortcuts are pointing to the folders origi

Re[2]: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Gary
Hi Allie, On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 4:35 PM, you put forth, in part, about "Ability to edit new email": A> Heh! Too easy. The 'e' and 'r' keys are too close for comfort. :-) A> Mistakes can easily be made. Okay, okay *however* then one can make use of key remapping A> The two option

Re: TB! and Windows Explorer

2001-10-31 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 4:02:21 PM, Allie C Martin wrote: > For me, I've noted that TB! will not rename account folders when you > rename the accounts via the TB! interface. However, I've been making > a lot of changes *within* accounts for the last couple weeks and all > folder names and

Re: TB! and Windows Explorer

2001-10-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 @ 16:20:21 -0600 [ Wed, 31 Oct 2001], Dwight A Corrin [DAC] wrote these words of wisdom: ... >> For me, I've noted that TB! will not rename account folders when you >> rename the accounts via the TB! interface. However, I've been making >> a lot of ch

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 @ 16:18:09 -0600 [ Wed, 31 Oct 2001], Dwight A Corrin [DAC] wrote these words of wisdom: ... DAC> Seems potentially as dangerous as folder templates. It could get DAC> away from one before managed to flag, or one could forget why DAC> they were in the

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:24:39 -0600, Gary [G] wrote these comments: ... G> In Mutt, for example, a Ctrl E automatically puts you in this edit G> mode for new mail, where a Ctrl R is the reply edit mode, certainly G> this is easy to use. Heh! Too easy.

Re[2]: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Gary
Hi Allie, On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 3:50 PM, you hammered out in part about "Ability to edit new email": A> I do agree that it would be a useful feature for some but I can A> certainly understand Januk's concern as well. An easy compromise would A> be to make the feature not too easily acc

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 4:18:09 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote: > On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 4:15:03 PM, Allie C Martin wrote: >> Dragging the message to the outbox, editing it, and then returning >> it to the original folder or where-ever you wish is certainly >> feasible. This is what

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 4:15:03 PM, Allie C Martin wrote: > Dragging the message to the outbox, editing it, and then returning > it to the original folder or where-ever you wish is certainly > feasible. This is what I do. Seems potentially as dangerous as folder templates. It could get a

Re: TB! and Windows Explorer

2001-10-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 @ 09:57:51 +1300 [ Thu, 1 Nov 2001], Carren [C] contributed this to our collective wisdom: ... C> It would appear, after much tearing out of hair, that Windows C> Explorer has not been updating it's TB! information according to C> changes I have made

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 3:50:12 PM, Allie C Martin wrote: > I used to be against the concept but an old member of this list, a > one called Ming Li, changed my mind on the issue. :-) > I do agree that it would be a useful feature for some but I can > certainly understand Januk's concern

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In a message dated, Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:15:48 -0800, Januk Aggarwal [JA] wrote: ... DW>> but I'd prefer it to be straightforward as it is in at least one DW>> other email client I know of. JA> If you're talking about Outlook, please don't make TB cop

Re: How To I Remove all Templates?

2001-10-31 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Raj, At 9:29 AM on Wednesday, October 31, 2001 you wrote the following on the posted subject 'How To I Remove all Templates?': Raj> However %Blank does not work when one uses Ctrl+Space. Raj> i.e. once you already have some Raj> text generated by the default template. TB! first look

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Doug, It was foretold that on Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 18:57 GMT +, Doug Weller [DW] would type: DW> but I'd prefer it to be straightforward as it is in at least one other DW> email client I know of. If you're talking about Outlook, please don't make TB copy this "feature". Tha

Re: How To I Remove all Templates?

2001-10-31 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Scott, Historians believe that Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 22:02 GMT +1030 was when, Scott Sims [SS] typed the following: SS> I would like to know how to I remove all templetes from the bat? Just so you know, if you ever try to forward something, your forwarding template can't be blank

TB! and Windows Explorer

2001-10-31 Thread Carren
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I have been having major frustrations with archiving some of my mail folders with Mailbag Assistant. I think I finally have it figured out, but it has brought to light an interesting discovery and I am interested in your opinions. It would ap

Re: PGP - config.problem

2001-10-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:15:22 +0530, Pkroy [P] graced us with these comments: ... P> i am new to bat1.53 and i like its features.. P> want to use PGP features but couldnot configure .. P> can anyone help.. Well, you can use TB! using PGP Tray which d

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2001-10-31 Thread Silviu Cojocaru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 10:32:19 PM , Chema Berian wrote the following on the "The Bat! - suggestions" thread: CB> Every day, more and more users of email clients forget to disable the reading CB> confirmation request. CB> It woul

Re[2]: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Gary
Hi Dwight, On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 1:39 PM, you hammered out in part about "Ability to edit new email": D> True. I often forget to use it, although I have a column allocated for D> messages. If one could leave the MEMO window open all the time, and D> have it box down with TB! that woul

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 1:27:53 PM, Gary wrote: > TB does have the ability for notations within a message > (shft+cntl+i) True. I often forget to use it, although I have a column allocated for messages. If one could leave the MEMO window open all the time, and have it box down with TB! t

Re[2]: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Gary
Hi Dwight, On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 1:13 PM, you hammered out in part about "Ability to edit new email": D> I've wished for this capacity in the past. I get notice of phone calls D> via e-mail. When I was using Eudora, I could change to a different D> color font and take notes right in th

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 12:29:37 PM, Gary wrote: R>> Hit Ctrl-S and edit the text file you saved. > Of course, that saves the email file independently on your HD (in txt > format), but does not save the message within the TB!'s message base for > later retrieval/searching after editing.

Re[4]: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Gary
Hi Doug, On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 12:57 PM, you hammered out in part about "Ability to edit new email": D> I'd like this also. I like to use TheBat! for archiving, and moving to D> the outbox is tedious. I guess forwarding it to myself might be ok, D> but I'd prefer it to be straightforwa

Re[3]: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Doug Weller
Hi Gary, Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 6:29:37 PM, you wrote: [SNIP] > Of course, that saves the email file independently on your HD (in txt > format), but does not save the message within the TB!'s message base for > later retrieval/searching after editing. What I am talking about is > having t

Re[2]: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Gary
Hi Marck, On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 12:35 PM, you hammered out in part about "Ability to edit new email": G>> I can see no way of doing this presently, the ability to edit G>> received email. M> You could redirect the mail to yourself, edit as required and use M> local delivery. That shou

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gary, On 31 October 2001 at 11:12:28 [GMT-0600] (which was 17:12 where I live) Gary wrote to TB! and made these points: G> I can see no way of doing this presently, the ability to edit G> received email. You could redirect the mail to yourself,

Re[2]: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Gary
Hi Roman, On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 12:10 PM, you hammered out in part about "Ability to edit new email": R> On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 18:12:28, Gary wrote: >> I would like to see TB! have the ability to allow me to optionally >> edit and save mail that I have received. For exam

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Gary, Op Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:12:28 -0600GMT (dat is 31-10-01, 18:12 +0100GMT waar ik woon), schreef jij: G> I would like to see TB! have the ability to allow me to optionally G> edit and save mail that I have received. For example, many times, I G> will see a reply to a question tha

Re: Ability to edit new email

2001-10-31 Thread Roman Katzer
On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 18:12:28, Gary wrote: > I would like to see TB! have the ability to allow me to optionally > edit and save mail that I have received. For example, many times, I > will see a reply to a question that is deep in a thread of answers. > Now, all I need is the a

PGP - config.problem

2001-10-31 Thread pkroy
Hello tbudl, i am new to bat1.53 and i like its features.. want to use PGP features but couldnot configure .. can anyone help.. thanks Best regards, pkroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators

Re: Archiving messages and attachments

2001-10-31 Thread Mrten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op woensdag 31 oktober 2001 schreef Joseph N.: > I am assuming the following, but please let me know if this is > correct or not. I am assuming that incoming attachments will > continue to be stored in the archived Unix-style files even after > the

Web link : doesnot open

2001-10-31 Thread pkroy
Hello tbudl, the webpage link , with command "open URL" doesnot open after installing/uninstalling opera, this problem has surfaced.. can anyone help, how to rectify it using bat1.53d under windowsME on celeron400 with 128MB RAM Best regards, pkroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___

Archiving messages and attachments

2001-10-31 Thread Joseph N.
I am archiving my messages and attachments by exporting them to Unix-style files and, when necessary, appending additional messages. My question concerns attachments. My system is configured to store incoming attachments within message bodies, and also to delete attachments when the related messa

Re[2]: How To I Remove all Templates?

2001-10-31 Thread Raj
Marck, On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, at 12:12:55 [GMT +] (which was 17:42 where I live) you wrote: MDP> You can - use the %BLANK macro to specify that a template is MDP> intentionally blank. I guess Scott's question was how to remove all templates. I wonder where the template info is stored whi

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2001-10-31 Thread Chema Berian
Hello Listers, On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, at 19:20:23 [GMT +0700] (which was 13:20 where I live) Syafril wrote: CB>>Ignore confirmation request/Answer confirmations CB>>automatically. SH> It's already there, see Account Template and Folder Template :-) SH> Perhaps you meant while

Re: The Bat! - suggestions

2001-10-31 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 at 13:04:16 GMT +0100 (31/10/2001 19:04 where you think I live) "Chema Berian"=[CB] wrote to RITLABS : CB> There are some features I would like to see in your program: CB> Every day, more and more users of email clients forget to disable the reading CB> confirmatio

Re: PGP - config.problem

2001-10-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:12:07 +0700, Han Thomas [HT] wrote these comments: ... HT> Yes... I will.. but PGP has been under development for decades. HT> SecureBat is very promising, but it is new. There will be HT> weaknesses. So even with SecureBat I'd

Re: How To I Remove all Templates?

2001-10-31 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Raj, On 31 October 2001 at 17:32:57 [GMT+0530] (which was 12:02 where I live) Raj wrote to Scott Sims on tbudl and made these points: SS>> hen I write a new e-mail reply or whatever just want the window to be SS>> blank that have hello and whatev

The Bat! - suggestions

2001-10-31 Thread Chema Berian
Hello The Bat! developers, I'm using The Bat! Version 1.53o Serial Number 2B077B82 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2. There are some features I would like to see in your program: Every day, more and more users of email clients forget to disable the reading confirmat

Re[2]: PGP - config.problem

2001-10-31 Thread Han Thomas
Hello Mrten, Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 5:43:40 PM, you wrote: M> well, there are traces of course... shortcuts perhaps on your desktop, M> temporary files left behind... Yes, not to mention the registry.. Temporary files I'd hope would go on to the encrypted drive when TB is installed there

Re: How To I Remove all Templates?

2001-10-31 Thread Raj
Scott, On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, at 22:02:38 [GMT +1030] (which was 17:02 where I live) you wrote: SS> hen I write a new e-mail reply or whatever just want the window to be SS> blank that have hello and whatever on it.. I am not sure if you can delete some files in the relevant dir... but a temp

Re: How To I Remove all Templates?

2001-10-31 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Scott, SS> I would like to know how to I remove all templetes from the bat? Whether it's possible to delete all templates I don't know, but you could make them blank. SS> When I write a new e-mail reply or whatever just want the window to be SS> blank that have hello and whatever on it..

Re[3]: Web link : doesnot open

2001-10-31 Thread Raj
Roy, On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, at 16:42:56 [GMT +0530] (which was 16:42 where I live) you wrote: p> btw in case it was no so, how to go about and rectify the problem I guess what you want to do is to ensure that the URL opens Opera instead of IE. While I am not sure of the exact location... If

Re: PGP-problems with TB

2001-10-31 Thread Alexander Levenetz
Hello David, > You have to manually edit the pgp65.dll with a Hex-editor Why is that so? Couldn't that be corrected in a new dll? > and replace the version number (standard this is 6.5i as I recall > correctly) with 6.5.8. Well, that didn't work. But if that is the only reason why the numbers

How To I Remove all Templates?

2001-10-31 Thread Scott Sims
Hi, I would like to know how to I remove all templetes from the bat? When I write a new e-mail reply or whatever just want the window to be blank that have hello and whatever on it.. Also the when selecting text in the write message window it won't delete only way I can is to cut it... Anyhelp Wou

Re: PGP - config.problem

2001-10-31 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:43:40 +0100, Mrten [M] graced us with these comments: ... M> i think i have a tendency to go off-topic on this list, apologies :) e-mail security? Off-topic? Nah. :-) It's very relevant and Ritlabs has a very good solution for

Re[2]: Web link : doesnot open

2001-10-31 Thread pkroy
Hello Jernej, Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 3:23:32 PM, you wrote: JS> Hello pkroy, JS> 31. oktober 2001, 7:02:50, you wrote: p>> the webpage link , with command "open URL" doesnot open p>> after installing/uninstalling opera, this problem has surfaced.. JS> Check, that you have a program asso

Re: PGP - config.problem

2001-10-31 Thread Mrten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op woensdag 31 oktober 2001 schreef Han Thomas: > Personally I'd recommend getting this one: > http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgpdisk/ (Use the NT version if you run > Windows 2000) please, if you must use PGPdisk, download from http://www.ipgpp.com/

Re: Web link : doesnot open

2001-10-31 Thread Jernej Simončič
Hello pkroy, 31. oktober 2001, 7:02:50, you wrote: p> the webpage link , with command "open URL" doesnot open p> after installing/uninstalling opera, this problem has surfaced.. Check, that you have a program associated to weblinks... (Try this: Start -> Run -> enter http://www.yahoo.com/ and

Re: PGP-problems with TB

2001-10-31 Thread David van Zuijlekom
Hello Alexander, Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 10:49:48 AM, you wrote: AL> Why does it show 6.0.2i instead of 6.5.8?? You have to manually edit the pgp65.dll with a Hex-editor and replace the version number (standard this is 6.5i as I recall correctly) with 6.5.8. Then if you sign a message you'

PGP-problems with TB

2001-10-31 Thread Alexander Levenetz
Hello everybody, I'm running 1.54 beta10 right now, but no different with 1.53t which I used before. I installed PGP 6.5.8 for NT (running Win2k). I had PGP 6.0.2 installed before. PGP itself works fine, I created my own private key (a new one with 6.5.8, as I had some strange problems with the