Hi Lynn,
@15-Dec-2003, 11:42 -0800 (15-Dec 19:42 UK time) The.Limit said to
Roelof:
RO Folder template?
Following unsub instructions ... sigh
I wonder if it worked??? lol!
Doubtful. The listserver doesn't read commands sent to the list. You
have to send them not to TBUDL@ but to [EMAIL
Monday, December 15, 2003, 3:52:56 PM, you wrote:
MDP Doubtful. The listserver doesn't read commands sent to the
MDP list. You
MDP have to send them not to TBUDL@ but to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to have worked ... messages are no longer coming
to the other address. It didn't come out quite
Have you got Winrar installed on your machine?
Tony.
Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Another of those impossible reply messages:
I used the reply template listed below to reply to the Copy
Editing List digest (the list is run by Bill Blinn, a member
here), and copied the subject line from the digest to the MicroEd
window in place of the digest subject which the reply macro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ON Thursday, November 6, 2003, 11:40:28 PM, you wrote:
MDP It's not an option. It would be something that Steve has composed
MDP for himself in a template using macros.
Marck,
Ok, then I understand what is happening.
Sorry for the sloppy PGP
Hi Tbudl,
I am losing the 'Subject' in New Messages. Here are my symptoms :-
1. I start a new message and enter text in the 'Subject'.
2. I click my mouse inside the message body template to begin
entering the main text of the msg.
3. The Subject line changes to I forgot to put
Hi Steve,
@7-Nov-2003, 07:51 +1100 (06-Nov 20:51 UK time) Steve Mullarkey
said:
I am losing the 'Subject' in New Messages. Here are my symptoms :-
... snip
3. The Subject line changes to I forgot to put in the subject
line.
... snip
Is this some new feature ?
No, it's a new way
to sacrifice your intelligent subject management.
MDP Every time you move from the header editing to the body editing and
MDP the body is unmodified, the template is re-evaluated. This is
MDP kicking in your custom You forgot the subject line stuff.
Hi Marck,
Were is this option to be found?
--
Best
Hi Gerard,
@6-Nov-2003, 23:08 +0100 (06-Nov 22:08 UK time) Gerard said to
Marck:
MDP You will have to sacrifice your intelligent subject management.
MDP Every time you move from the header editing to the body editing and
MDP the body is unmodified, the template is re-evaluated. This is
MDP
Hello Louis,
Friday, October 17, 2003, 12:53:25 PM, you wrote:
L Hello TBUDL,
Just a test and a mistake. :)
--
Best regards,
Louismailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello TBUDL,
--
Best regards,
Louis mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Thomas,
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 12:59:12 AM, you wrote:
or try (haven't checked it):
%HDRSUBJECT=Bird-pix
When I enter this macro, the subject stays empty.
I've tried it in the AB group and in the Quick template.
--
Cheers,
Edgar
Communicating with TB! v2.00.6, Windows XP
On Wed 8 October 2003, 15:45:15 +1000, Edgar wrote:
This does not solve it. It will always jumps back to the subject
I set in the macro. It does not matter which I edit first the body or
the header.
Hmm, if I set the subject with a macro I can, as Roelof suggested, add to that
subject by going
Hello Robin,
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 1:13:49 PM, you wrote:
Hmm, if I set the subject with a macro I can, as Roelof suggested, add to that
subject by going to the body of the message, MAKING SOME CHANGE TO THE BODY,
and then going back to the subject.
If I try to add to the subject
Hi Edgar,
@8-Oct-2003, 19:38 +0200 (08-Oct 18:38 UK time) Edgar [E] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Robin:
E But is this normal or should it work differently like changing
E subject go to body and then make a change there?
E Is this due to the way the macro's work?
In a word - yes
after moving from header to body.
Thanks, that makes it clear.
I have just one other question about setting subject headers though
:-)
If I set the header with %SUBJECT=Test and use this in a reply
template.
How can I change the set subject from within a quick template.
I've tried
Hi Edgar,
@8-Oct-2003, 20:48 +0200 (08-Oct 19:48 UK time) Edgar [E] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
E How can I change the set subject from within a quick template.
E I've tried it with %subject= %subject=no test but it stays
E test.
Interesting. Works fine for me. It may be the same
]
I also want to set a subject (identifying the group) in this case:
Subject: [bird-pix]
(with a space behind it).
But when I use the %Subject=[bird-pix] macro it will set it but when
I start a new message and enter something behind it (e.g. [bp] test),
it will always jump back to [bird-pix] .
How
Hallo Edgar,
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:48:09 +0200GMT (7-10-03, 22:48 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
E But when I use the %Subject=[bird-pix] macro it will set it but when
E I start a new message and enter something behind it (e.g. [bp] test),
E it will always jump back to [bird-pix] .
Try
Hello Roelof,
On Wednesday, 8. October 2003, at 00:09:27 [GMT +0200] you wrote:
E But when I use the %Subject=[bird-pix] macro it will set it but when
E I start a new message and enter something behind it (e.g. [bp] test),
E it will always jump back to [bird-pix] .
Try to edit the body first
Hello Roelof,
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 12:09:27 AM, you wrote:
E But when I use the %Subject=[bird-pix] macro it will set it but when
E I start a new message and enter something behind it (e.g. [bp] test),
E it will always jump back to [bird-pix] .
Try to edit the body first
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
As for Swen.A - every one of those messages sits in my quarantine
folder, having been easily identified by my AVG plug-in.
Do you also get the pop-up window each time the virus is identified and
quarantined? I have the AVG plug-in too, but am using v1.62r and the
free
Hi Ken,
@24-Sep-2003, 01:57 -0500 (07:57 UK time) ken green [K] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As for Swen.A - every one of those messages sits in my quarantine
folder, having been easily identified by my AVG plug-in.
K Do you also get the pop-up window each time the virus is
K identified and
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, 2:57:59 AM, ken green wrote:
kg Do you also get the pop-up window each time the virus is identified
kg and quarantined? I have the AVG plug-in too, but am using v1.62r and
kg the free edition of AVG. Can you disable this in other versions?
I'm using the same as
Deborah W wrote:
I'm using the same as you - 1.62r the free version of AVG. You can
choose what you want to happen when a virus is received, by going to
Options - Virus Protection.
Thank you, thank you, thank you (Marck too)
--
Ken Green
TheBat! v1.62r, Win2000 SP4
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
This is how I deal with that plague:
I have a seperate address for PM, and that one does hardly get any
spam, and it hasn't received Swen (yet?).
The addresses for NGs and MLs are set to not download message over
50KB but delete them right on the server (Account /
Open an Edit mail message window.
Enter a subject at least 4 or 5 words in length.
Place the cursor at the beginning of the 2nd word from the left.
Hold down SHIFT + CTRL while pressing the right arrow (words right of the cursor
become highlited).
Once several words are highlited (and still
Hello rich,
QUESTION: Will having posted this message here (as opposed to at RITs' site) do
anything at all toward alerting them (RitLabs) that such a problem exists? I
find that I get better responses to my queries here than there and I'd hate like
h*ll to have
to post everything twice!!
On Sun 21 September 2003, 22:31:12 +1000, Roelof Otten wrote:
Another way would be: exporting the message as .msg, editing the
exported message with a text editor, importing the message in TB's
message and deleting the original message. This is somewhat
cumbersome, but it keeps all headers.
the hundreds of bad ones. In that effort, it helps
much when mailing list messages have a subject line that begins with
[ML topic], such as [proxomitron], [timematters], etc. Is there any
chance that the various TB! lists could adopt something similar? Is
there a reason not to, other than the obvious one
Hi Joseph,
@22-Sep-2003, 09:49 -0500 (15:49 UK time) Joseph N. [JN] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TB:
JN ... it helps much when mailing list messages have a subject line
JN that begins with [ML topic], such as [proxomitron],
JN [timematters], etc. Is there any chance that the various TB!
JN
and MLs are set to not download message over
50KB but delete them right on the server (Account / Properties / Mail
Management).
If you are on lists with large attachments, this won't work for you,
though.
In that effort, it helps much when mailing list messages have a
subject line that begins
Hi Bat! Fans,
Is there any way of changing received mail subject line at all?
For instance, mail incorrectly marked with a Spam header by SpamPal
or others, and which therefore does not sort by subject when moved to
the correct folder?
Sorry if I have missed something obvious here.
--
John
Hallo John,
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:26:28 +1000GMT (21-9-03, 13:26 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JP Is there any way of changing received mail subject line at all?
No. Unless you consider moving the message to the Oubox, editing it
and moving it to the correct folder to be a workable solution
of others
DG (Stuart Hemming and Chema Berian, perhaps others as well) appear
DG in my message list with no subject, and the body of the message
DG includes part of the kludges even though I have not
DG ctrl-shft-k'd. See an example:
I've checked your example messages and over here they appear correct
Hello Roelof,
On Sep, 10, 12:22:47, you wrote to Dave:
RO Are the failing mails always from the same persons? I couldn't
RO help noticing that Allie, Stuart and Chema all have a
RO X-Spam-Processed: header in their kludges.
First header in image was X-AV-Processed: which is inserted by my
Hallo Chema,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:40:49 +0200GMT (10-9-03, 12:40 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CB First header in image was X-AV-Processed: which is inserted by my
CB server just below the X-Spam-Processed:
So I noticed, but failed to mention. ;-)
CB (I can confirm it does without
with no subject, and the body of the message
includes part of the kludges even though I have not
ctrl-shft-k'd. See an example:
http://dave.cyzap.com/tb.gif
Why is this happening?
--
Dave
Using TB! 2.00
on Windows XP Pro
Current version is 2.00
Hi Bats,
When Edvinas Matiusatitis sent email message to the group today
entitled, Why base64 encoding in 2.0?, this appeared in a totally
different font on my screen? The message content, itself, had normal
look to it, just the fonts in the subject pane were very different
bold
Hi Maggie,
@8-Sep-2003, 17:58 -0400 (22:58 UK time) mm Meister [MM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Bats:
MM When Edvinas Matiusatitis sent email message ... this appeared
MM in a totally different font on my screen? ...
MM Why is that?
Because the headers used 8 bit characters with
Hello Marck,
Monday, September 8, 2003, 9:25:43 PM, you wrote:
MDP Because the headers used 8 bit characters with accents and your
MDP default font wasn't capable of displaying them. So a near match font
MDP was used instead.
Thanks, Marck. Which font should I use? I like accents. :)
--
Hi Maggie,
@8-Sep-2003, 22:25 -0400 (03:25 UK time) mm Meister [MM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP Because the headers used 8 bit characters with accents and
MDP your default font wasn't capable of displaying them. So a near
MDP match font was used instead.
MM Thanks, Marck. Which font
TBUDL,
Any news on 2.0, like new feature list and when it will be released?
--
Best regards,
Scott mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
Hello all,
Monday, September 1, 2003, Scott Derrick wrote:
Any news on 2.0, like new feature list and when it will be released?
AFAIK it will be released today, You should wait some hours :-)
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 2.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, August 31, 2003, Marek Mikus wrote...
Any news on 2.0, like new feature list and when it will be released?
AFAIK it will be released today, You should wait some hours :-)
I _really_ hope they postpone that release :/ Or they've not
Wednesday, August 13, 2003, zParticle wrote:
What filter expression can I use to indicate this field is blank?
[^\S]*$
could be right. No guarantees, though.
--
Urban
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
What filter expression can I use to indicate this field is blank?
I couldn't find any info on this in the manual/FAQ, and the archive
appears to be down.
--
zParticle
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
On Monday, July 28, 2003, Thomas Fernandez wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
TF But out of curiosity: what kind of practice is that, and what
TF kind of non-primitive system incorporates a primitive MUA?
Thomas,
The practice is a law practice (U.S. employment and labor law, on
behalf of
On Monday, July 28, 2003, Allie Martin wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM Perhaps you could tune Spampal to not be so sensitive.
AM Also, be sure that your whitelist is well tuned.
Allie,
Thx for the thoughts. Yes, I think both of those are good ways to
approach this problem.
--
JN
Hello Joseph,
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:01:24 -0500 GMT (29/07/03, 20:01 +0700 GMT),
Joseph N. wrote:
TF But out of curiosity: what kind of practice is that, and what
TF kind of non-primitive system incorporates a primitive MUA?
The practice is a law practice (U.S. employment and labor law, on
Occasionally, my spam filters will give me a false positive. It's no
trouble to move the message, but by then the subject line has been
modified to mark the message as spam. How can I re-edit that header so
it appears the way the sender intended?
--
JN
Hello Joseph,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:10:55 -0500 GMT (28/07/03, 22:10 +0700 GMT),
Joseph N. wrote:
Occasionally, my spam filters will give me a false positive. It's no
trouble to move the message, but by then the subject line has been
modified to mark the message as spam. How can I re-edit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph N., [JN] wrote:
JN Occasionally, my spam filters will give me a false positive. It's no
JN trouble to move the message, but by then the subject line has been
JN modified to mark the message as spam. How can I re-edit that header
JN so
, the header added is:
AM X-SpamPal: SPAM
AM Check your spamfilter for this and use that instead of the horrid
AM Subject munging option. It's horrid for the very reason that you're
AM experiencing. Your false positives are munged.
this is what I have setup, BUT it also stopped the spam filter from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC this is what I have setup, BUT it also stopped the spam filter from
PC working in TB. Since I don't use the subject to define spam, but the
PC x-headers, it moves the spam to a new folder ( not inbox) and the spam
PC
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 12:07 PM, you wrote:
AM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
AM Hash: SHA1
AM Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC this is what I have setup, BUT it also stopped the spam filter from
PC working in TB. Since I don't use the subject to define spam, but the
PC x-headers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC If I put it below, then it would come into my inbox, and I wouldn't know
PC spampal had called it spam, since I don't change the subject. If I
PC manually read it, and send it to spamcop, then I don't need spampal do
PC If I put it below, then it would come into my inbox, and I wouldn't know
PC spampal had called it spam, since I don't change the subject. If I
PC manually read it, and send it to spamcop, then I don't need spampal do
PC I?
AM Why don't you have the filter move the message to a spam folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC ok, if I used Spamcop filter, yes, I read the mail message,
PC determine that it is spam, CTRL-ALT-S to send AND move it to a SPAM
PC folder. This requires me reading the message, determining it is
PC spam, and dealing
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 12:40 PM, you wrote:
AM Hmmm. I think you're doing too much. SpamPal will work well enough
AM alone. It can be made to use the SpamCop blacklisted IP list anyway.
AM Personally, I don't use SpamCop's IP list because there I get too many
AM false positives.
actually I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Cartwright, [PC] wrote:
PC actually I am using popfile and I created a TB filter using the :
PC X-Text-Classification: spam
PC as the filter, and I haven't had a false-positive yet.
Ok. Then. My suggestion is to stop using SpamCop to help
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 2:44 PM, you wrote:
PC On Monday, July 28, 2003, 2:26 PM, you wrote:
PC X-Text-Classification: spam
PC as the filter, and I haven't had a false-positive yet.
AM Ok. Then. My suggestion is to stop using SpamCop to help detect spam and
AM use only POPfile. It'll work
Hello Allie,
Miguel, aka MAU, will attest to POPfiles 99.99% accuracy. ;) ;) ;)
Only 99.74% Allie :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
28-Jul-2003 22:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miguel, aka MAU, will attest to POPfiles 99.99% accuracy. ;) ;) ;)
Only 99.74% Allie :-)
What, it hasn't gotten any better since last time? Lme! ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
Hello Alexander,
What, it hasn't gotten any better since last time? Lme! ;-)
Of course it has. Last time it was way down to 99.73% ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is
,
or subject. So if I set SpamPal not to modify the subject line, then
my business app wouldn't be able to filter out the spam.
It seems like my only choices are to come up with a new business
e-mail address, which the spamsters may not detect and which would
allow me to modify how SpamPal operates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph N., [JN] wrote:
JN ... The problem is that the business-related MUA can filter only by
JN sender, recipient, or subject. So if I set SpamPal not to modify the
JN subject line, then my business app wouldn't be able to filter out
JN the spam.
I
Hello Paul,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 14:59:23 -0400 GMT (29/07/03, 01:59 +0700 GMT),
Paul Cartwright wrote:
PC besides that, I have actually gotten replies from ISPs when I sent a
PC spam to spamcop. I thought we were supposed to be anonymous using
PC spamcop. Unfortunately I believe I have gotten
Hello Joseph,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:49:20 -0500 GMT (29/07/03, 05:49 +0700 GMT),
Joseph N. wrote:
My business e-mail goes into a primitive MUA that is a component of a
not-primitive practice management database.
You don't seem to have any choice here. But out of curiosity: what
kind of
Hello tbudl,
I am having a problem with this, previously fine macro,
%WRAPPED='%SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)^Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:%-
[\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))%-
%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%HEADERS%-
On%SUBPATT=2, at %SUBPATT=3 [GMT%SUBPATT=4] %-
(which was %OTIME in my TimeZone) you
Hello:
I'm subscribed to a particular mailing list that does not set
In-Reply-To: or References: headers and so I set the View Threads
By option for its folder to Subject, which works pretty well --
except that the first message that starts a thread (the one without a
Re: in the Subject
Some time around 6/18/2003 19:58:23, I think I heard DZ-Jay say:
-- SNIP! --
except that the first message that starts a thread (the one without a
Re: in the Subject line) is not included in the threads. So I
always get, for example, a message list like this:
Ugh! Nevermind, I found out what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neurowerx, [N] wrote:
N That depends. The References header may contain multiple
N references, the In-Reply-To header contains only the last
N reference.
N If you use threading by references in your inbox (while the mails you
N wrote are in your
17-Jun-2003 07:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The References can't contain ANY references - WL wrote that there was
no References included.
Correct. I was just explaining the difference.
As long as the message, with the MID equal to the MID in the I-R-T,
exists in the same folder, it will
ooh..look at me...I'm using folder templates :)
Anyways, I usually have my email sorted w/ threads.
Unfortunately, some webmail software doesn't use the
references header, so threads break. I can switch
back and forth between references and subject based
threading, but it would be nice if I
and subject based
threading, but it would be nice if I can have TB use
references (if available), then by subject. Is this
possible?
no, but developers plan this feature.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 1.63 Beta/11
under Windows 2000 5.0
and subject based
threading, but it would be nice if I can have TB use
references (if available), then by subject. Is this
possible?
Yes, that's how it should work. Most newsreaders do this or permit
this as an option.
In a similar vein, some sofware doesn't use references;
instead, they use
16-Jun-2003 23:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a similar vein, some sofware doesn't use references;
instead, they use In-reply-to. Can that be used for
threading?
I believe that's already handled.
That depends. The References header may contain multiple references, the
In-Reply-To header
On Tue 17-Jun-03 12:53am -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16-Jun-2003 23:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 16-Jun-03 5:23pm -0400, WL wrote:
In a similar vein, some sofware doesn't use references;
instead, they use In-reply-to. Can that be used for
threading?
I believe that's already
Hello tbudl,
Another one, If I need to Dynamicly change the FROM Address based on
the TO Address how can I do this in Templates (Reply and New
Templates)
--
Best regards,
Michael ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
No answer is also an answer.
http://.thompsonmike.co.uk/
PGP KeyID :=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
@21-Mar-2003, 20:52 -0800 (04:52 UK time) Michael L. Wilson [MLW] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MLW When I reply to messages and use the fixsub macro from
MLW http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/samples.html
MLW The subject
On Friday, March 21, 2003 at 20:52:08GMT -0800 (which was 11:52 PM where I live)
Michael L. Wilson wrote and made these points on the subject of Disappearing
Subject:
MLW When I reply to messages and use the fixsub macro from
MLW http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/samples.html
MLW
Hello TBUDL,
When I reply to messages and use the fixsub macro from
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/samples.html
The subject disappears.
Does anyone have an idea or a fix for this macro? Here is the macro
Quick Template 5.Description : Fixup a messy Re: subject
Handle : FIXSUBJ
Hello,
OK, I give up. Where do I go to change this?
I set it once, so it _must_ be possible!
--
Nick
Using TheBat!: v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hi tbudl at thebat.dutaint.com:
In the past Nick was post:
ND OK, I give up. Where do I go to change this?
ND I set it once, so it _must_ be possible!
easy, secondary button over the titles
--
Best Regards,
Task Control
mail: TaskControl at SoftHome dot net
Using:
- Windows 98
Task(?),
ND OK, I give up. Where do I go to change this?
ND I set it once, so it _must_ be possible!
TC easy, secondary button over the titles
TC - The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7
Is this is beta thing? All that I get is Copy, Write, Reply and
Add.
--
Nick
Using TheBat!: v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1
Hi tbudl at thebat.dutaint.com:
In the past Nick was post:
ND OK, I give up. Where do I go to change this?
ND I set it once, so it _must_ be possible!
TC easy, secondary button over the titles
TC - The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7
ND Is this is beta thing? All that I get is Copy, Write, Reply and
ND Add.
Hi All,
On 19 Mar 2003 16:56:05 (my local time 08:56:05), Nick Dutton wrote
(in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
OK, I give up. Where do I go to change this?
Go to Option / Preference / System; click on the message pane header
Change button at the bottom.
--
Regards, Anthony
It's your
Hello All,
I have a question. Since TB! supports multiple OpenPGP plugins plus
it's own internal version... What's the best version to use? GnuPG?
PGP 6.5X? The Internal one?
--
Best regards,
David
Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We learn best when we are having fun --- Have fun.
Using The
Hello Thomas,
Never would anybody think of that.
Of course. Who would have those unmentionable wishes ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hello all,
Any reason why TB doesn't spell check the subject line? Don't you
think it should?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
http
Hallo Miguel,
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:24:03 +0100GMT (3-3-03, 18:24 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MAU Any reason why TB doesn't spell check the subject line?
Probably because it's not in the message body.
MAU Don't you think it should?
No. Why?
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Hello Roelof,
MAU Don't you think it should?
No. Why?
Because I do :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hallo Miguel,
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:17:38 +0100GMT (3-3-03, 19:17 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
MAU Don't you think it should?
No. Why?
MAU Because I do :-)
In that case, use the %subject macro to insert your subject line into
the message body, so the spell checker is used. Afterwards you
ON Monday, March 3, 2003, 7:11:46 PM, you wrote:
RO No. Why?
Yes you do, Roelof.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Your financial cost can best be figured out when you realize that if you
were to devote the same time and energy
Hallo Gerard,
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:50:49 +0100GMT (3-3-03, 19:50 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RO No. Why?
G Yes you do, Roelof.
Ouch! Gerard the brainwasher is back. ;-)
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL
Hello Roelof,
In that case, use the %subject macro to insert your subject line into
the message body, so the spell checker is used. Afterwards you only
need to delete the subject from the body.
No, thank you. If I misspell something in the subject I'll blame TB.
And, why worry if maybe
Hello Miguel,
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:28:44 +0100 GMT (04/03/03, 03:28 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
In that case, use the %subject macro to insert your subject line into
the message body, so the spell checker is used. Afterwards you only
need to delete the subject from the body.
You cold
Hello TBUDL,
When the individual you correspond with is using an email program that
does not use the headers In-Reply-To and References I like to
thread-by-subject. The problem is the case sensitivity.
subject thread-by-subject
216-432-002 FYI 05
Hello Greg,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, at 13:47:57 GMT -0600 (2/26/2003, 1:47 PM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Don't you think thread thread-by-subject would be better if case
sensitivity was eliminated as a determinating varible
401 - 500 of 1423 matches
Mail list logo
