[tw] Re: How about a Bookmarks section on TiddlyWiki.com ?

+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit

[tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 5:16:00 PM UTC+1, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > from another thread, relevant here ... > > Jeremy Ruston wrote: >> >> ... In retrospect I was far too influenced by Markdown back in 2011/12 >> when TW5 wikitext was first being defined. >> > > Side note I want to make on jus

[tw] Re: Install Tiddlymap Plugin

Hi, Thank You For your Reply. I have deleted the *",". *Still the plugin is not installed. It does not show up. Please help to install the plugins. Thank You. On Saturday, March 10, 2018 at 10:06:50 AM UTC+5:30, Joshua Fontany wrote: > > Check the syntax there, you may need to delete that las

[tw] Re: Install Tiddlymap Plugin

I tried it and it works for me I've downloaded all the tiddlymap things.. hotzone, vis, topstoryview and tiddlymap itself I made a folder "felixhayashi" inside plugins/tiddlywiki - this is different to what you did, maybe this solves the problem Inside that folder I moved all the folders from t

[tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

This discussion is really interesting! One thing is more clear to me, from the excellent, relevant, replies, is how discussion of "Markup" quickly invokes multiple issues: amongst others, conversion, compliance standards, nice styling & working-practices. I'm thinking about how to restate some

[tw] Re: tiddler list with titles and tags

Thanks Jed. I ended up using this: <$list filter="[!has[draft.of]tag[Task]!tag[Done]tag[Next]]"> <$checkbox tag="Done"> <$link to={{!!title}}><$view field="title"/> - {{!!tags}} which creates a comma separated tag list. On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 10:49:00 AM UTC-4, Jed Carty wrote: > > Yes

[tw] Re: How about a Bookmarks section on TiddlyWiki.com ?

+1 I think that would be a good step. The issues arise in how to "metadata it" & whether it should go through "peer approval." My sense is that its "yet more work." I mean, WHO is gonna organise this? One thing I thought about was posting links to such "special posts" to Twitter. I've largely

[tw] Re: How about a Bookmarks section on TiddlyWiki.com ?

Footnote. One way to gather "candidate posts" would be to have a forwarding address. Both GG online and email versions of this group support forwarding. That seems a low-hassle approach? Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. T

[tw] Re: How about a Bookmarks section on TiddlyWiki.com ?

We're talking about small bookmarks. It doesn't have to be triple-vetted (it's all going to be vetted 2x -- once for the submission and 2nd when it gets merged). Mediocre ideas and sensational ideas might live hand-in-hand in harmony. The thing is, they wouldn't be lost. -- Mark On Tuesday, Ma

[tw] Re: How about a Bookmarks section on TiddlyWiki.com ?

*Mark... "The thing is, they wouldn't be lost."*Bingo! Mark S. wrote: > > We're talking about small bookmarks. It doesn't have to be triple-vetted > (it's all going to be vetted 2x -- once for the submission and 2nd when it > gets merged). Mediocre ideas and sensational ideas might live hand-i

[tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

Right Recently Mark S. worked with Lua (inside Pandoc) to create a "proof of concept" converter WikiPedia -> TiddlyWiki. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/0Z4F7fBOBgQ/ebTapW6zBgAJ Lua is interesting as both a convertor and a sophisticated support for complex formatting. Ste Wilson wr

[tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

I just want to add the footnote that its easy in TW to COMBINE a "personal markup system" with the standard markup it has. If you composite your own markup BEFORE the main parser runs then you can have the best of both as first it would deal with your markup and then standard TW markup. The dow

[tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

I'm kinda of the opinion that for some types of document structures that we can in TW "make input even easier than Markdown" Joe Armstrong wrote: > > Markdown solves the problem "make the input easy" > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" gr

[tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

This is an interesting issue. On the one hand we have markup for wikitext styling using, for instance, the @@ syntax. On the other hand one inevitably hits a contradiction in Markup systems that are meant to be human readable. That to get complex styling is not sane through "Markup", as Jermole

[tw] Re: TiddlyWiki and Hyperstructures - "zzstructures, mSpaces, and Polyarchies"

Mario, thanks for the insight. I like this q: Is it possible to represent tiddlywiki content using "zzstructures, mSpaces or polyarchies? I'll continue to share here (and elsewhere) as I progress in this work... On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 7:21:33 AM UTC-4, PMario wrote: > > Edited the tree to

[tw] Re: A few questions about macros/widgets/functions

Great thread. Thanks, Joe. And thanks, Xavier. What I find most interesting about TiddlyWiki is that someone like Joe and someone like me can work with it. Joe has a clearly different approach to learning and understanding than I do. I never looked at the <> code, just used it for a while until

Re: [tw] Re: How can I hide the author's name in all tiddlers?

Check out http://designwritestudio.com/#Display, which provides buttons to turn on/off tiddler titles, subtitles and tags, and conveniently lists templates. (Written by Hegart, I think, who used to inhabit this group, and was one of the participants in DesignWriteStudio a few years back). //ste

Re: [tw] Re: A few questions about macros/widgets/functions

Next question is where is the code for a widget? I think I understand (famous last words) macros - but not widgets. Where is the code for a simple widget? Which is the simplest widget??? Cheers /Joe On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Steven Schneider wrote: > Great thread. Thanks, Joe. And

Re: [tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

I woke up with the following thought: I'm not so worried about the difference in markdown / wiki syntaxes I think this is like language - there are many dialects of English American, English, Australian and so on - they differ but we understand each other. Then there is Swedish, Norwegian, Danis

[tw] Re: A few questions about macros/widgets/functions

I am not sure if it is the simplest widget, but the text widget is one of the simplest widgets. It is part of every wiki but here is a link to it on tiddlywiki.com https://tiddlywiki.com/#%24%3A%2Fcore%2Fmodules%2Fwidgets%2Ftext.js -- You received this message because you are subscribed to th

Re: [tw] Re: A few questions about macros/widgets/functions

Just go to the shadow tab of the advanced search. Look for the name of the widget minus the "widget" term. Like button.js I'm guessing that the TextWidget would be simplest because it does the least. There's some documentation how-to on plugins at http://cjhunt.github.io/ though for me I foun

[tw] Re: Right Justify Sidebar like in The TiddlyWiki ... Wiki

Yes! This is it! Thank you so much! I thought I was going to have to play with the CSS. This is much better. Thanks, Ed! On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 6:02:17 PM UTC-5, Ed wrote: > > Dear Sean, > > Click "Open Control Panel" icon. > Click "Appearances" > Click "Team Tweaks" > Find "Sidebar lay-

Re: [tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

Yes. Jeremy made a careful Text-Slicer edition . Personally I'd be in for reducing on one sweep all HTML. There is something very satisfying in reducing carefully wrought HTML to ground zero markup. Josiah On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 20:15:11 UTC+1

[tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

Ciao PMario I really appreciate your concern over standards. I have an observation. At 7764:3.4 they include Fountain.io syntax as a Markdown variant. That is odd in a spec given that Fountain is, when it is workin

[tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

How important, in your opinion, PMario, are RFC's to TiddlyWiki's uptake? I can't honestly say for myself that an RFC motivated me to do anything. At the same time I do understand they have a role. BUT is it *before* the fact or *after*? In other words, for TW, WHAT exactly should we be promoti

Re: [tw] Re: Issue: I'd like to talk about Markup---broadly

Joe, I had a similar waking idea a few weeks/months ago, make HTML the common language, but community members pointed out there is a potential loss of information HTML > TW given the degree of sophistication that can be added to HTML, also just think how more is moving into CSS now. Personally

[tw] copy button in each code block

Now that there is a `copy-to-clipboard` macro in the pre-release, could someone figure out a way to have a "copy" button in a corner of each code block, please? :) I used to have it in TW Classic, it was extremely useful. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro

[tw] Re: [TW5] Single executable version of tiddlywiki

Jed, Progress, looking great. I could not get this working due to something neither of us were aware of, I had a windows app installed for NodeJS, So tiddlywiki.exe was opening that session in my browser and I never got to see the "Welcome to the MultiUser TiddlyWiki." Somehow they clash, I w

[tw] Re: [TW5] Single executable version of tiddlywiki

Jed/Josiah, The solution is already very easy to distribute, and need not have a portableapps.com install, or it would be very easy to make one. However If someone is trying to distribute a TiddlyWiki they built and want to host it through TiddlyWikiMU (my name for Jed's solution), it seems it

[tw] Re: copy button in each code block

Rustem, What do you define as a Code Block? How does it differ from the Text or other field? Regards Tony On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 11:10:42 AM UTC+11, Rustem wrote: > > Now that there is a `copy-to-clipboard` macro in the pre-release, could > someone figure out a way to have a "copy" b