Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2003-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : hgomez 2003/10/01 00:54:09 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java Log: More setters for gzip compression support. Here is the correction for getRemoteAddr(), getRemoteHost(), getRemotePort(). I

Tomcat 3.3.2 default HTTP connector ?

2003-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez
Do you agree to use Coyote2 as the default HTTP connector for Tomcat 3.3.2 ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml

2003-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hgomez 2003/10/01 02:43:40 Modified:catalina/src/conf server.xml Log: Add comments about gzip settings + +!-- Note : To use gzip compression you could set the following properties : + +

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java

2003-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : hgomez 2003/10/01 00:54:09 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Http11Processor.java Log: More setters for gzip compression support. Here is the correction

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml

2003-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Urg. Should I back port change to coyote_10 ? I'd prefer using the Coyote HEAD in TC 4.1, I think. I'm sick of all those branches ;-) +1, less branches, less works

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml

2003-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Urg. Should I back port change to coyote_10 ? I'd prefer using the Coyote HEAD in TC 4.1, I think. I'm sick of all those branches ;-) +1, less branches, less works I'll try to build it, and see

Re: Tomcat 3.3.2 default HTTP connector ?

2003-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez
Larry Isaacs a écrit : I have my 3.3.2-dev builds running again. Currently it uses the MAIN branch of JTC to build util and the coyote_10 branch to build coyote/http11. Once upon a time, I thought there was a reason that 3.3.2-dev couldn't use MAIN for coyote. I'm not sure what that reason was

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml

2003-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Remy Maucherat wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: I'll try to build it, and see if it works. I'll also diff the adapter between the two branches, to see if there aren't any forgotten patches. If it works well, we can try to include that with 4.1.28. It doesn't look good: j-t

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml

2003-10-01 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat a écrit : Remy Maucherat wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: I'll try to build it, and see if it works. I'll also diff the adapter between the two branches, to see if there aren't any forgotten patches. If it works well, we can try to include

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat build.xml

2003-10-02 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : larryi 2003/10/01 19:50:59 Modified:.build.xml Log: Update to build using MAIN branch of JTC coyote and http11. The jars are a little different from coyote_10 version. Thanks Larry

Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-02 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Usually, when a Tomcat branch nears its release, a new branch is created. However, I only have a few feature ideas that make some sense, and the problem is that they are minor evolutions (hence, they could perfectly fit inside the 5.0 branch). This includes: -

Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-02 Thread Henri Gomez
3. Provide a complete working configuration example for a cluster of tomcat servers with a front-end tomcat as well, i.e. a pure tomcat-only solution. We already have the jvmRoute mechanism, but I think it needs more examples/documentation so that people start using it. So you want to do a

Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-02 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez a écrit : 3. Provide a complete working configuration example for a cluster of tomcat servers with a front-end tomcat as well, i.e. a pure tomcat-only solution. We already have the jvmRoute mechanism, but I think it needs more examples/documentation so that people start using

Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-02 Thread Henri Gomez
Jean-Francois Arcand a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Henri Gomez a écrit : 3. Provide a complete working configuration example for a cluster of tomcat servers with a front-end tomcat as well, i.e. a pure tomcat-only solution. We already have the jvmRoute mechanism, but I think it needs more

Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez a écrit : Jean-Francois Arcand a écrit : +1 The security mechanism in TC 4.x and higher (due to digester) avoid me to use such easy configuration tuning and so we have to stay with Tomcat 3.3.x for now. I'm probably missing something herewhy the digester suffer from

Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Craig R. McClanahan a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Jean-Francois Arcand a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Henri Gomez a écrit : 3. Provide a complete working configuration example for a cluster of tomcat servers with a front-end tomcat as well, i.e. a pure tomcat-only solution. We already have

Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez a écrit : Henri Gomez a écrit : Jean-Francois Arcand a écrit : +1 The security mechanism in TC 4.x and higher (due to digester) avoid me to use such easy configuration tuning and so we have to stay with Tomcat 3.3.x for now. I'm probably missing something herewhy

Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez a écrit : Henri Gomez a écrit : Henri Gomez a écrit : Jean-Francois Arcand a écrit : +1 The security mechanism in TC 4.x and higher (due to digester) avoid me to use such easy configuration tuning and so we have to stay with Tomcat 3.3.x for now. I'm probably missing

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Constants.java

2003-10-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jfclere 2003/10/03 03:05:57 Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11 Constants.java Log: getBytes() uses platform's default charset... Bad on my EBCDIC machine! /** @@ -239,8 +256,28 @@ /** * Ack

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c

2003-10-06 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : mturk 2003/10/04 02:20:59 Modified:jk/native/common jk_ajp_common.c Log: Normal C compiler doesn't allow to declare variables like C++ does. Revision ChangesPath 1.40 +15 -21

Http Connector / Gzip

2003-10-06 Thread Henri Gomez
Hi to all, What about using regexp in HTTP 1.1 connector to include/exclude browser which could/couldn't use gzip compression ? May be it could be use also to drop to HTTP 1.0 browser which claims to be 1.1 compatible, but are not. CF: Apache HTTPD server

Re: Http Connector / Gzip

2003-10-06 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, What about using regexp in HTTP 1.1 connector to include/exclude browser which could/couldn't use gzip compression ? May be it could be use also to drop to HTTP 1.0 browser which claims to be 1.1 compatible, but are not. CF: Apache HTTPD

Re: Http Connector / Gzip

2003-10-07 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, What about using regexp in HTTP 1.1 connector to include/exclude browser which could/couldn't use gzip compression ? May be it could be use also to drop to HTTP 1.0 browser which claims

Re: Http Connector / Gzip

2003-10-07 Thread Henri Gomez
Well I take my inspiration from what is done in some TC 4.1 Valves... I know ;-) Some problematic stuff went away, though (the various mappers), but some remain. This feature would really need to be seriously optimized, as ideally this would be enabled by default. We could do better as

Re: Http Connector / Gzip

2003-10-07 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Could I commit my changes and start working on an optimizing version ? Yes, of course. There's no big rush to start optimizing this ;-) (it's really disabled by default, right ?) Yes, since the restrictedUserAgents and restrictedUserAgents are set

regexp 1.3 ?

2003-10-07 Thread Henri Gomez
Shouldn't we upgrade TC 4.1 and JTC to regexp 1.3 ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Notes in HTTP 1.1 connectors

2003-10-07 Thread Henri Gomez
What about the idea to add notes in HTTP 1.1 connector ? It will mimic the way HTTPD teams using BrowserMatch : - Disable HTTP 1.0 for some browsers BrowserMatch Mozilla/2 nokeepalive BrowserMatch MSIE 4\.0b2; nokeepalive downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 BrowserMatch RealPlayer 4\.0

Re: Http Connector / Gzip

2003-10-07 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat a écrit : +0 if disabled by default; -1 otherwise. All this stuff is inefficient, as it uses Strings. Ie, we take the byte array we have for the header value, convert it to a String, and then regexp will likely convert it to something

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml

2003-10-07 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : remm2003/10/07 06:25:17 Modified:catalina/src/conf server.xml Log: - The connector class being used by Tomcat 4.1 doesn't have the appropriate setters, nor the set-any-property mod that is in 5.0. As a result, the example won't work right now

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23675] New: - Ajp13Connector contains code that works only on JDK1.3+

2003-10-09 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23675. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23675] New: - Ajp13Connector contains code that works only on JDK1.3+

2003-10-09 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23675. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-09 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Henri Gomez a écrit : Note: I really love Xerces' error messages. Great it seems to works with : ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? !DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN http://java.sun.com/dtd

Re: Committing binaries in CVS [Was] RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe

2003-10-09 Thread Henri Gomez
Ignacio J. Ortega a écrit : Hola a todos: (Many time from my last post, things are settling here, so hope i will contribute some code in future :) shields up, nacho will be messing things shortly, now i'm only moderating our lists, and as some person said time ago moderation is to coding what

[Fwd: Re: Restarted Tomcat (again)]

2003-10-09 Thread Henri Gomez
FYI : ---BeginMessage--- On 9 Oct 2003, at 08:37, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Leif, No worries about time. You replied before I left for the road, and I won't be posting this reply until at least 15 hours after your note. The platform is Solaris. The application is Tomcat. The major problem is

Re: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

2003-10-09 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : For 4.1.28: ballot [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable /ballot For 5.0.13: ballot [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta /ballot They didn't include my late patch to remove setKeepAlive from JTC ? We should avoid problem with JDK 1.2/1.3 users ,(

Re: [5.0.13] [4.1.28] VOTES

2003-10-09 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Mladen Turk wrote: One question. Why do we need to vote on that? AFAICT the 4.1.27 was stable. and the 5.0.12 was Beta. IMHO we should vote on Release/DoNotRelease. If for example the 5.0.13 is a less quality code then 5.0.12 do not release at all, or vote for a Stable,

Re: Committing binaries in CVS [Was] RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/procrun/bin tomcat.exe tomcatw.exe

2003-10-10 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk a écrit : -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere Remy Maucherat wrote: Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: Sorry to disagree, but it's impossible to build the said binaries without expensive compilers. (please do not suggest Cygwin) Why? Is the Makefile broken? Doesn't

TC 3.3.2-dev and endorsed lib

2003-10-13 Thread Henri Gomez
In TC 4.1.x and 5.0.x there is support for endorsed lib but nothing like this in tc 3.3.2-dev. Since we may have people (including myself), who will have to use SDK 1.4.x with Tomcat 3.3.2, I like to add such feature to Tomcat 3.3.2-dev. I was thinking put the endorsed in lib/endorsed, ie next to

Re: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-13 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez a écrit : Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Henri Gomez a écrit : Note: I really love Xerces' error messages. Great it seems to works with : ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1? !DOCTYPE web-app PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN

Re: TC 3.3.2-dev and endorsed lib

2003-10-13 Thread Henri Gomez
Bill Barker a écrit : - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:28 AM Subject: TC 3.3.2-dev and endorsed lib In TC 4.1.x and 5.0.x there is support for endorsed lib but nothing like this in tc

Re: TC 3.3.2-dev and endorsed lib

2003-10-13 Thread Henri Gomez
Bill Barker a écrit : - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:09 AM Subject: Re: TC 3.3.2-dev and endorsed lib Bill Barker a écrit : - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL

Re: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-13 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: No reply for this request ? Should I assume I could start to work on settings the currentWorking dir at web.xml dir location at web.xml parsing time ? I like basing the resolution on the host appBase a lot more. Well it will be problematic for all

Re: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-13 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: No reply for this request ? Should I assume I could start to work on settings the currentWorking dir at web.xml dir location at web.xml parsing time ? I like basing the resolution on the host appBase

Re: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-13 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Glenn Nielsen wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: No reply for this request ? Should I assume I could start to work on settings the currentWorking dir at web.xml dir location at web.xml parsing time ? I like basing the resolution

Re: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-13 Thread Henri Gomez
CF w3c.org ... relative URIs are relative to the location of the resource within which the entity declaration occurs. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-external-ent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-13 Thread Henri Gomez
The base should be the location of web.xml (la prochaine fois j'envoie un mail en français :---) +1 ;-) Time for a Tomcat Dev French Forum, to fix these language problems ? ;) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Digester and external entities with systemId only : Was: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-14 Thread Henri Gomez
I traced TC 5.0 and Digester and suspect what could be the problem with external entities when only SYTEM is defined ie : !ENTITY appset1 SYSTEM appset1.xml !ENTITY appset2 SYSTEM appset2.xml In Digester.java, at least in the 1.5 release, resolveEntity return null if publicId is null even if

Re: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-14 Thread Henri Gomez
Craig R. McClanahan a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: CF w3c.org ... relative URIs are relative to the location of the resource within which the entity declaration occurs. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#sec-external-ent As long as Tomcat uses the Digester.parse() entry point that takes

Re: Digester and external entities with systemId only : Was: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-14 Thread Henri Gomez
Bill Barker a écrit : You will probably get more traction by posting to commons-dev. While tomcat-dev still has a couple of commons committers (and, no, I'm not one of them) that hang out here, its not like the old days :(. Sure but Remy has written the Digester so it must still be commiter :-)

Re: Digester and external entities with systemId only : Was: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-14 Thread Henri Gomez
Bill Barker a écrit : - Original Message - From: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 12:42 AM Subject: Re: Digester and external entities with systemId only : Was: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next

Re: Digester and external entities with systemId only : Was: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
Jean-Francois Arcand a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: I traced TC 5.0 and Digester and suspect what could be the problem with external entities when only SYTEM is defined ie : !ENTITY appset1 SYSTEM appset1.xml !ENTITY appset2 SYSTEM appset2.xml In Digester.java, at least in the 1.5 release

Re: Digester and external entities with systemId only : Was: Important requirement : Re: [next] What's next ?

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
As described above, you're trying to use an illegal URL, which goes above the top of the webapp's namespace. You'll need to use absolute file: or http: type URLs, or provide your own EntityResolver that does whatever you want it to do. The only way to developpers and admins to have it works

jk/jk2 - time for apr

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
Hi to all, Now that jk seems stabilized a bit, should we focalize on jk2 ? For instance I added some features to jk (ping/pong) which should be ported to jk2. Also I wonder if APR is mandatory for jk2. I'd like to use APR as a facade to all Operating System calls. The goal is to hide all the

Re: jk/jk2 - time for apr

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk a écrit : +1 to use the APR as mandatory for the mod_jk. You can rename it to the mod_jk2 after that easily :-) Heu, the idea is to make jk2 (native2) apr mandatory. We'll keep jk as it is today. * the plan - update jk2 (native2) to use APR only - port jk add-ons like ping/pong to

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Hi, I think it would be possible, using a new rule, to allow system properties inside server.xml (and possibly elsewhere) for attribute values. This is the same as what is being done by Ant in its build scripts. This would add an additional degree of configurability

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
Do you speak about the ${xxx} properties as present in Tomcat 3.3.x ? Possibly. Basically, if you have a foo.bar sys property, you can put ${foo.bar} in server.xml, and it will be replaced with the property value (like in Ant). I didn't know this was present in 3.3. Yes it was in TC 3.3.1 and

Re: [5.0] System properties in server.xml (and elsewhere)

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Do you speak about the ${xxx} properties as present in Tomcat 3.3.x ? Possibly. Basically, if you have a foo.bar sys property, you can put ${foo.bar} in server.xml, and it will be replaced with the property value (like in Ant). I didn't know

Re: jk/jk2 - time for apr

2003-10-15 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Mladen Turk a écrit : +1 to use the APR as mandatory for the mod_jk. You can rename it to the mod_jk2 after that easily :-) Heu, the idea is to make jk2 (native2) apr mandatory. We'll keep jk as it is today. * the plan - update jk2 (native2

jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2 (still waiting Nacho for IIS). APR side will be to : - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory - Remove #idef APR - Use APR for all OS operation and sus will save us from handling all the #include for all the diverses IO operation

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/include jk_channel.h jk_workerEnv.h jk_worker.h

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk a écrit : -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.17 +17 -0 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_channel_un.c 1.6 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/common/jk_mutex.c 1.57 +34 -1

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2 (still waiting Nacho for IIS). IIS uses APR by default (staticaly linked) for a long time. APR side will be to : - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory - Remove

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez I'd like to know who could works on jk2 evolution. +1 Thanks. I can (not before friday): 1. Change all the (quasi boolean) functions to return the apr_status_t instead int (0, 1) 2. aprize jk2_log to use the apr_file_t 3

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez You should know what apr call should be used to mimic select isn't it ? PING/PONG right? Nothing that simple :-). The magick is apr_poll. It will require some modifications to the channel in general. hasinput method has been

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Ok, about everybody seems to agree on using apr for jk2 (still waiting Nacho for IIS). APR side will be to : - Update doc to indicate that APR is mandatory - Remove #idef APR - Use APR for all OS operation and sus will save us from handling all

jk2/tc4/jkstatus problems ;(

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Hi I could get jkstatus via : http://mysystem/jkstatus/ But it failed to find http://mysystem/jkstatus/jkstatus?cfgOrig=1 http://mysystem/jkstatus/jkstatus?cfgParsed=1 http://mysystem/jkstatus/jkstatus?scoreboard=1 My original conf was : [status:] info=Status worker, displays runtime

Re: Jkstatus, What does it mean?

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Angus Mezick wrote: Tried tomcat-user, they don't have a clue about this it seems. I have this on my jkStatus page when using jk2. id namelb_factor lb_valueroute errorState gracefulepCount errorTime 2 web02WWW:8019 1 43 web02WWW:8019 N

Re: Jkstatus, What does it mean?

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Angus Mezick wrote: Where? I looked there (I think). Could have missed it but I don't see and documentation on status aside from how to create it. Can you please tell me the exact page you looked at before replying to my mail that references epCount, errorTime, lb_value, and lb_factor? Should

Re: Jkstatus, What does it mean?

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Angus Mezick wrote: All for jk2. -Original Message- From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 8:26 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: Jkstatus, What does it mean? Angus Mezick wrote: Where? I looked there (I think). Could have missed

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Done. The machine where it runs is stable but inside FSC firmwall. Could we copy it somewhere on apache.org to have it mirrored ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Done. The machine where it runs is stable but inside FSC firmwall. Could we copy it somewhere on apache.org to have it mirrored ? I have copied and adapted it to my account in minotaur. So we'll have an URL available

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Costin Manolache wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: And no the who's who ;) I'd like to know who could works on jk2 evolution. Until December is very unlikely I'll have any free time. I would like to help with the unix domain channel and JNI - but it'll be very limitted... Sorry. You're more than

Re: JK/ajp13 connection reuse problem

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Andy Armstrong wrote: I'm trying to bring the Domino connector up to date with the latest codebase and I'm running into a problem with connection reuse. The characteristic is that with connection reuse working normally the first message from Domino to Tomcat round trips without any problem but

Re: JK/ajp13 connection reuse problem

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Andy Armstrong wrote: I'm trying to bring the Domino connector up to date with the latest codebase and I'm running into a problem with connection reuse. The characteristic is that with connection reuse working normally the first message from Domino to Tomcat round trips without any problem but

Re: JK/ajp13 connection reuse problem

2003-10-16 Thread Henri Gomez
Andy Armstrong wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: Could you get an ethereal dump ? That mail coincided exactly with my trying to remember whether I had a network tracing tool installed on this PC - and fortunately I do :) Ethereal dump coming up. In such case ethereal is allways your friend. I'll

Re: [5.0] Property replacement

2003-10-17 Thread Henri Gomez
Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, I'd like to make a small proposal to do property replacement. Included are changes that should be made in the digester, and that I'll post on commons-dev if I have approval. - Add a get/setProperty to Container. This would allow a property inheritance across

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-20 Thread Henri Gomez
Glenn Nielsen wrote: +1 I can help out. This is a significant change for a minor revision to 2.0.4, perhaps we should bump it to 2.1 or even 3.0? Since it's an 'internal rewrite', it should stay 2.x, may be 2.1 could be the right name But first we should cleanup all jk2 from #iddef APR defines

Re: jk2 evolution plan

2003-10-20 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk wrote: From: Bill Barker I could get on-board with this, after Mladen's suggestion to change the return-type of most methods to jk_status_t. Without this, mod_jk2 is hopelessly broken (and I'll contunue to ignore it :). It's to apr_status_t ;-). Sill, takes a bit more time

Re: JK/ajp13 connection reuse problem

2003-10-21 Thread Henri Gomez
Andy Armstrong wrote: Andy Armstrong wrote: UK time here. Still trying to get Ethereal to trace local (intra machine) traffic. I'm not around tomorrow so it may be Monday before there's anything to dissect. Monday came and went. Is anyone else interested in the detail of what follows

Re: JK/ajp13 connection reuse problem

2003-10-21 Thread Henri Gomez
Andy Armstrong wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: That's as far as I've got and I'm just wondering whether it'd be nice to write an Ethereal packet dissector for AJP 1.3 or whether that would count as displacement activity. Is there anything specific I should be looking for Henri? There is allready

Re: JK/ajp13 connection reuse problem

2003-10-21 Thread Henri Gomez
Andy Armstrong wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: The ajp13 disector was introduced in ethereal some months ago And I now have a copy of it rather than last year's model :) Anyway, the conversation looks like this in summary and a (naive) analysis of the contents of the packets doesn't yield anything

Re: JK/ajp13 connection reuse problem

2003-10-21 Thread Henri Gomez
Andy Armstrong wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: - FORWARD REQUEST - SEND HEADERS - SEND BODY CHUNK - END RESPONSE (REUSEP:1) OK, that's enough of a difference to explain what I'm seeing... May be something to do with chunk encoding which has been modified in ajp13/jk (after your works on domino I

Re: JK/ajp13 connection reuse problem

2003-10-21 Thread Henri Gomez
Andy Armstrong wrote: Henri Gomez wrote: - FORWARD REQUEST - SEND HEADERS - SEND BODY CHUNK - END RESPONSE (REUSEP:1) OK, that's enough of a difference to explain what I'm seeing... May be something to do with chunk encoding which has been modified in ajp13/jk (after your works on domino I

jk binaries and new mirorring

2003-10-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Hi to all, Some people ask me for jk 1.2.5 iSeries binaries. I will build it but where should I upload it to make it later replicated on mirrors site ? Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: mod_jk timeout?

2003-10-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Brian Maher a écrit : I noticed this message from Glenn Nielsen recently on this mailing list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg47341.html It appears that hgomez submitted a bunch of code that allows you to configure a ping/pong mechanism that helps it detect hung tomcats.

Re: jk binaries and new mirorring

2003-10-27 Thread Henri Gomez
Glenn Nielsen a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, Some people ask me for jk 1.2.5 iSeries binaries. I will build it but where should I upload it to make it later replicated on mirrors site ? Look in CVS at j-t-c/jk/HOW-TO-RELEASE Thanks, upload done

Re: mod_jk timeout?

2003-10-28 Thread Henri Gomez
Brian Maher a écrit : On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Henri Gomez wrote: If the thread on java side is a long running task or a blocking task, it should be handled by the servlet engine and sus some watchdog support should be added in Tomcat. In you're exemple I didn't know how the thread could be ever

jk2/apr

2003-10-28 Thread Henri Gomez
Ding/Dong, What's the status of jk2 use APR ? Mladen did you are still with works in progress ? Regards - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jk2/apr

2003-10-29 Thread Henri Gomez
Henri Gomez a écrit : Mladen Turk a écrit : From: Henri Gomez Ding/Dong, What's the status of jk2 use APR ? Mladen did you are still with works in progress ? I'm in a few deadline loops, again ;-). So if nobody beets me before weekend I'll commit the needed changes. Ok we could until

Re: Internal Server Error, ErrorDocument does not work using mod_jk2 and servlet engine stopped

2003-10-30 Thread Henri Gomez
Bernhard Erdmann a écrit : Hi, how can I customize Apache's error page if mod_jk2 does not get a usable worker (Tomcat is down)? Using Apache 2.0.47, mod_jk2 2.0.2 and Tomcat 4.1.24 running on Linux I get an error message when the servlet engine is stopped (Tomcat is down): The servlet container

Re: Help for jasper2/JWSDP1.3 - how to get rid of log4j dependecy?

2003-10-30 Thread Henri Gomez
Hristo Stoyanov a écrit : Hi all- I am using Tomcat (as part of JSWDP1.3) and would like to pre-compile my JSPs with Jasper2 in my Ant script. Jasper2 requires commons-logging.jar, which, for some unexplicable reason, starts asking for classes in log4j.jar (why is this idiotic behaviour of

Re: Internal Server Error, ErrorDocument does not work using mod_jk2 and servlet engine stopped

2003-10-30 Thread Henri Gomez
Bernhard Erdmann a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: [...] The first sentence (The servlet container is temporary unavailable or being upgraded) comes from mod_jk2 (jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src/jk/native2/common/jk_worker_lb.c): #define NO_WORKER_MSG The servlet container is temporary

Re: Internal Server Error, ErrorDocument does not work using mod_jk2 and servlet engine stopped

2003-10-30 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk a écrit : From: Henri Gomez Bernhard Erdmann a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: I'd like Apache to use its configured ErrorDocument 500 when Tomcat is down instead of mod_jk2 printing its own error statement. Ok, we could make it in the new jk2 reworks (Mladen ?) Perhaps to make

Re: JK2 is using APR as mandatory

2003-11-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Mladen Turk a écrit : As said in the subject... plus the jk_pool and jk_channel socket are marked as deprecated. Couple of things to do. 1. APR-ize jk_file_logger to use apr_file API instead stdio's FILE. 2. All methods will return apr_status_t instead int (work in progress). 3. Henri, what about

Re: jk2/apr patch

2003-11-03 Thread Henri Gomez
Ok, Who is handling today the many configure/m4 suggestions ? BTW, I'm using Redhat 9.0 and the apr-config is available so it should be a common situation even when it's a distro and not by hand build - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: jk2/apr patch v2

2003-11-04 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere a écrit : Kurt Miller wrote: Thanks to jean-frederic clere for input on this. Ok, here goes again... ;-) Attached is a patch that makes the following changes for building jk2 via configure and make: 1) Introduces a new configure argument called --enable-apr-threads=val for

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/support jk_apr.m4 jk_apxs.m4

2003-11-05 Thread Henri Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Oups, Eclipse didn't understand the patch files (/dev/null) and sus garbage jk_apxs.m4, correct file to be commited right now... hgomez 2003/11/04 04:48:05 1.7 +131 -1jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/support/jk_apxs.m4 Index: jk_apxs.m4

Re: Vegas Anyone? :-)

2003-11-10 Thread Henri Gomez
Amy Roh a écrit : ApacheCon 2003 will be held in Las Vegas this November 16-19. Who is going to be there from Tomcat Dev? Maybe we can coordinate Tomcat get together... :-) Hum, a little too distant from France ;( - To

[VOTE] Kurt Miller as commiter

2003-11-11 Thread Henri Gomez
Hi to all, I would like to propose you a new tomcat commiter, Kurt Miller which as proposed many usefull patches for JK2. Since we want to deprecated jk and focus jk2, we need more people involved on jk2. Vote please. - To

Re: Why is mod_jk distributed both as 2.0.2 and 2.0.4?

2003-11-12 Thread Henri Gomez
Kurt Miller a écrit : From: Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perhaps the mod_jk connector should not be released with Tomcat 4/5 since it has its own release cycle and we are already doing separate releases of these. Regards, Glenn Would this work... When a stable version of mod_jk or

Re: [VOTE] Kurt Miller as commiter

2003-11-13 Thread Henri Gomez
jean-frederic clere a écrit : Henri Gomez wrote: Hi to all, I would like to propose you a new tomcat commiter, Kurt Miller which as proposed many usefull patches for JK2 Since we want to deprecated jk and focus jk2, we need more people involved on jk2. Vote please. Ok, it seems that nobody

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >