Oh, isnt that true about the
mainstream mediaLOL. Izzy
You guys should be journalists for CNN; youcan make
anything sound seedy.
Bill
Omigosh, this must be trueI think I
saw it on Star Trek!!! Izzy
Blaine:
Kolob is a ruling planet that lies near the vicinity of God's abode--it takes
1000 earth years to make one revolution--it was never touted in any Mormon
scripture as being God's actual place of
In my library I have many different translations Bill
and I can find the gospel in all of them. However, when I want to dig a little
deeper I always goto the KJV which IMO is better than anything that has
come along since.. As for fighting and dividing, I'm not into that either.
We are all
John
wrote:I
don't want to speak for Blaine, but I see nothing in Mormonism that prevents
either of us to fellowship with non-LDS Christians. Perhaps I don't
understand fellowship quite the same way you do
though.Fellowship. I do think that fellowship is bigger than
denominational
FYI-The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible (The oldest known
Bible translated for the first time into English) Harper More than 1000 years
older than any previously discovered biblical manuscripts with material never
before published or translated. Lance
- Original Message -
From:
Wm.
Waiting on pins and needles! Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004
10:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Covenant
versus Contract
Well I promised myself I wouldnt
write any more
Jt provides "worldview analysis" Whoda thunk it.
Yup,convictions arrived at concerning some matters influence
others.Lance
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 31, 2004 22:41
Subject: [TruthTalk] Perverting the words
of the living God
Now Bill, got
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the flow of the
blood is eternal and continual, that our sins are remembered NO
MORE.
jt: Unrepented sin has not gone
anywhere John and there is nothing wrong with God's memory
The problem for the
sinner is not sin, it is the decision to avoid God and, hence, His
I wouldn't get my hopes too high. Older doesn't
necessarily mean better and the
Essenes were a cult like group. The major intact
texts from caves 1 and 11 were
published by the late 1950's and didn't make any big
waves. judyt
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI-The Dead Sea Scrolls
A distinction I've found helpful on this C vs C
discussion is drawn from IF IFF. The former can be understood as" If this
then that" while the latter is understood to mean (not say) "If and only if".
`Are there "conditions" attached to grace? If there are and, we are fallen how
then do we
Are you being funny Lance? Yes some matters do
influence others, (where is discernment these days)? Bad company corrupts good
morals and we are not ever exhorted to seek out the devil in order
toreceive wisdom from God. Read the
Preface to the KJV and compare that with what these other
This book contains the 2,000 year old texts of the
Bible. THAT VERY SAME BIBLE you read daily. These are not non-biblical texts.
(ISBN 0060600640) Check it out "man". (intended as humour (Cdn sp) not sarcasm)
Lance
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL
We probably need to lay all preconceived ideas aside
andexamine our understanding of what grace means, that is the definition
ofgrace in the Word of God. We are taught that it means "unmerited favor"
- who coined that one? We are also taught that noone could ever fulfill
God's Law (which
Kinda yes and kinda no. The "no" part" has to do
with your scripture quotations. Every one of them is believed by yourself to
refer to a meaning that makes whatever point you are about in that conversation.
Sometimes that meaning is the real meaning. But, you too are"influenced".
Sometimes
Jt's meaning? Anyone presented with what you
outlined from scripture then, has the capacity within to say in response: a. I
do understand what you've just explained to me and I accept it and will repent
or, b. Same but, nope I don't want it.Lance
- Original Message -
From:
Correct me if I'm wrong Lance but I'm reading
youstating that I misread scripture because of outside influence (you have
already said that you don't believe the Holy Spirit is involved in this) so IYO
I am led away from what is "intrinsically true and right" However, in saying
this you are
I would hope that anyone presented with anything I say
would be Berean enough to look for it themselves in scripture gobefore the
Lord toask God forwisdom - thenwe will make some progress in
the right direction (I'm not looking for a following), and yes I do believe that
in spite of being
Check archives re:the role of the HS in
interpretation (my understanding). Given: Some on this site are actually
"believers". They quote scriptures intended to support an opposing meaning to
those you've quoted. This, at its worst is the "O Ya" factor and, at its best is
simply an
Thanks for putting your "cards on the table"
Lance
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 01, 2004 06:54
Subject: [TruthTalk] Covenant versus
Contract
I would hope that anyone presented with anything I
say would be Berean enough to look for it
The Dead sea scrolls were individual finds of individual manuscripts. There were multiple finds.
A manuscript is not a "Bible" or codexLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI-The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible (The oldest known Bible translated for the first time into English) Harper More than 1000
Kevin: Please research this title I listed. See
exactly what mss were translated. Are you devaluing this find?
lance
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 01, 2004 07:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perverting the
words of the
I am not detracting justclarifying your use of the word "Bible" they were mssLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin: Please research this title I listed. See exactly what mss were translated. Are you devaluing this find? lance
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: [EMAIL
What about the HS giving understanding Lance?
Believers!! Ppl believe in all kinds of doctrines and ideas and not all
are from the Spirit of Truth. Those with opposing meanings should be able to
show in balance and in context why the scriptures I post are being wrongly
used. By intrinsic do
and this is not the
standardJesus and the First Century Church left to us. Do you mean that Jesus did not really dine with
tax collectors and harlots?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 3:21
AM
Jonathan Hughes wrote:
Well I
promised myself I wouldnt
write any more posts until I had finished writing an exam next Monday
but I
wanted to put one small one forward. Blaine and Johns comments
below (thank you gentlemen) highlight an area that I have had a lot of
change
in
He ate with them but ATST was separate from them,
fellowship
and relationship involve trust and
commitment..
"Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because
he knew all
men and needed not that any should testify of man; for
he knew
what was in man" (John 2:24) and
"For such an high
Lance Muir wrote:
A distinction I've found helpful on
this C vs C discussion is drawn from IF IFF. The former can be
understood as" If this then that" while the latter is understood to
mean (not say) "If and only if". `Are there "conditions" attached to
grace? If there are and, we
Judy Taylor wrote:
We probably need to lay all preconceived
ideas aside andexamine our understanding of what grace means, that is
the definition ofgrace in the Word of God. We are taught that it means
"unmerited favor" - who coined that one? We are also taught that noone
could ever
Judy, in all respect and candor, how do you know
you are "from the Spirit of Truth"? I'll speak for my self here, when I go to
Scripture, I go in prayer, earnestly, inwardly, desiring that the Spirit lead me
to truth. Yet I sometimes (most times?) come away with a "leading" different
from
David, you are denying what several of your own prophets have stated. Have
you not seen the multitude of references that Kevin has provided that
indicate such? Are you saying that they were NOT prophets, and had no
authority, or were they wrong on just this one occasion?
Please set me
Wrong. He fellowshipped with them and then they
made a commitment to him, then they loved him. I John 4.18-19 -- "There is no
fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves torment.
But he who fears has not been made perfect in love.We love Him because He
first loved
PS,
This is not to say that fellowship and relationship
does not involve trust and commitment. It is to say that that relationship was
initiatesby Jesus at his movement toward them, in his utter acceptance of
them in spite of who they were, and his absolute refusal to leave them in their
I don't know that there is a difference Terry - keeping
and fulfilling is the same thing but we have been taught doctrines in
Christendom that do not conform us to godliness and holiness. Enoch was
pleasing to God and so was Elijah (they were translated). We are not required to
keep the
In a message dated 3/31/2004 10:46:09 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If we have a common parent, I think I'd
consider that qualifies as a brotherhood of sorts.
I agree but would add "spiritual" --- "spiritiual parent(s)"
John
In a message dated 3/31/2004 11:45:34 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
God has no religion
He's not Mormon?
J
I don't know that I would phrase it like that
Bill. When I was born again I know that God sealed me with the Holy Spirit
of promise but it was only when I layed aside all of the doctrines of men that
had gotten me confused (because there are so many of them) and came asking God
for wisdom
In a message dated 4/1/2004 2:24:06 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote:
I don't want to speak for Blaine, but I see nothing in Mormonism that prevents either of us to fellowship with non-LDS Christians
John did not write this (above). Try again. John wrote this
Though it is difficult nay, nigh on impossible to
underestimate the ability of even "long-time" believers to articulate on The
Nature of God The Nature of God's Gospel I will readily nay (once again)
acknowledge the following: 1. God is gracious. By His Spirit He takes the most
From: "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wrong. He fellowshipped with them and then they
made a commitment to him, then they loved him. I John 4.18-19 --
jt: He didn't fellowship with any of
the disciples before calling them. He said "Come follow me" and they left
everything and came.
Who are
This apparently is where your doctrine veers off
into a wide sweeping thing Bill. I don't see it in scripture. When the young man
came to Jesus who was rich and unwilling to part with his riches; he walked off
and Jesus was sad but he didn't go running after him. So from what we know
Jesus
Can we say with the Psalmist
The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul
The testimony of the Lord is sure making wise the simple
The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart
The commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes
The fear of the Lord is clean enduring for
Yes we can. Lance-
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 01, 2004 09:52
Subject: [TruthTalk] GOD'S LAW OUR FRIEND and SCHOOLMASTER
Can we say with the Psalmist
The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul
The testimony of the Lord is sure making wise the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated
3/31/2004 10:46:09 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If we have a common
parent, I think I'd
consider that qualifies as a brotherhood of sorts.
I agree but would add "spiritual" --- "spiritiual
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
David, you are denying what several of your own prophets
have stated.
DAVEH: No, Perry. I am denying the spin you are putting on their
words.
Have you not seen the multitude of references that Kevin
has provided that indicate such?
DAVEH: No.I have not. The
You know what the key to the scriptures is
Lance?
It's not Church doctrine, it's not words and it's not
indicatives and imparatives
It's the parable of the Sower found in Matthew 13:3,
Mark 4:3, Luke 8:5. jtFrom: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Yes we can.
In a message dated 4/1/2004 2:55:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the flow of the blood is eternal and continual, that our sins are remembered NO MORE.
jt: Unrepented sin has not gone anywhere John and there is nothing wrong with God's memory
Because I ahve changed my
DavidH,
If I produce a statement from one of the LDS prophets that says it WAS a
physical union, will you change your position? Or will you deny that the one
who stated it was a prophet?
Perry
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
"Key" comes off a little too much like "doctrine"
Judy. Even a JTD but,reading, indwelling Scripture is always and ever an
EXCELLENT IDEA! Blessings, Lance
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 01, 2004 10:23
Subject: [TruthTalk] GOD'S LAW OUR FRIEND
and
In a message dated 4/1/2004 5:01:33 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jesus fellowshipped with those who had first made a total
(left all) commitment to him. jt.
And a wonderful bunch of deserters they were.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the flow of the
blood is eternal and continual, that our sins are remembered NO MORE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:Unrepented sin has not gone anywhere John and
there is nothing wrong with God's memory
john: Because I ahve changed my mind about sin does not eliminate
In a message dated 4/1/2004 4:26:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not detracting just clarifying your use of the word "Bible" they were mss
Ditto all present day translations -- they are mss in the vein of B and Siniaticus.
John
In a message dated 4/1/2004 5:33:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He fellowshipped with them and then they made a commitment to him,
Perfect. Read it and weep, judyt.
john
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated
4/1/2004 5:01:33 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jesus fellowshipped with those who had first
made a total (left all)
commitment to him. jt.
john: And a wonderful bunch of deserters they were.
jt: Only while natural menas
In a message dated 4/1/2004 6:14:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Well done good and faithful servant."
It just struck me that I say these words to my grand kids all the time. " Matty, your coloring is great" (when , in fact, it leaves much to be desired). "Well done"
In a message dated 4/1/2004 6:19:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He didn't fellowship with any of the disciples before calling them. He said "Come follow me" and they left everything and came.
But they did not stop sinning. He did not make THAT a requirement of
In a message dated 4/1/2004 6:41:38 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You, John, and Lance cheer each other on because you have all read and follow some of the same theologians.
Not the least of whom is Jesus the Lord.
John
In a message dated 4/1/2004 7:09:07 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree but would add "spiritual" --- "spiritiual parent(s)"
DAVEH: I would not be opposed to that, but fear that by doing so it deemphasizes the literal nature of the parenthood of our Heavenly Father.
W
Are you saying the sacrifice is not sufficient to
overcome sin John
That he left us no power and no gifts when he
ascended?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated
4/1/2004 6:14:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Well done good and faithful servant."It just struck
In a message dated 4/1/2004 7:48:25 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
john: Because I ahve changed my mind about sin does not eliminate sin from my life
(Rom 7:25, I John 1:8 , Ro 3:23)
jt: We not only have to change our mind and hate it, we separate ourselves from it and
In a message dated 4/1/2004 8:04:12 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you saying the sacrifice is not sufficient to overcome sin John
no. Your are the one saying. that. He did all that He could but, in the end, it depends upon us. Absolutely crazy.
John
In a message dated 4/1/2004 7:48:25 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know whether or not you said it but you hear it all the time in Churches
YOU said that I made that statement and when put on the spot, you ignore and move on.
John
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 6:56
AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Perverting the words
of the living God
I don't know that I would phrase it like that
Bill. When I was born again I know that God
Got to take grandson to the Dr. will address them when
we get back.
However, it is all true and the one I quoted negates
nothing Paul taught
neither does Romans invalidate Hebrews.
jt
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated
4/1/2004 7:48:25 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Show me where I said you said it.
I just stated it as general fact... jt
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a
message dated 4/1/2004 7:48:25 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I don't know whether or not you said it but you hear it all the
time in ChurchesYOU said that I made
John,
I have really been appreciating your posts. You and
Terry are like the elders of our little congregation. I'm fully on board with
your grace doctrine. I think it is the only way to understand the whole
of Scripture, Old and New Testaments. I agree that therewas a transference
of
Preach it, elder John!
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:55
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perverting the
words of the living God
In a
message dated 4/1/2004 6:14:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Well done good and
Bill wrote:
I won't be coming to the party. My connection is
just too slow for that much fun.
Slow dial-up connections are fine for this chat. Don't let a slow
connection keep you from coming.
Peace be with you.
David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida.
--
Let your speech be always with
David, I have a 57 k modem, but I usually can only connect at around
9600-14400. Will that still work?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Chat Session Thursday, 9:00 pm Eastern
Bill wrote:
David, I have a 57 k modem, but I usually can only
connect at around 9600-14400. Will that still work?
There are two levels to the chat. One is voice. The other is text. If
you really are getting connections that slow, you might have some
trouble with audio. You certainly could
Judy Taylor wrote:
I don't know that there is a difference
Terry - keeping and fulfilling is the same thing but we have been
taught doctrines in Christendom that do not conform us to godliness and
holiness. Enoch was pleasing to God and so was Elijah (they were
translated). We are
In a message dated 4/1/2004 8:46:19 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, I know you are aware of this, but for the sake of those who may not be, the difference between our Bible's translation and these here is strictly a matter of interpretation.
Hey -- thank you for the
Rhetoric LOL
Open your eyes and look at the shameful condition of these Manuscripts.
They are full of additions subtractions blank spaces, big ugly blotches from erasing.
VATICANus Sainaiticus are tainted on almost every page. It is the product of hundreds of years of tampering. Whay all the
Thank you, my brother, and through you God has made
my day as well.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:23
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Covenant versus
Contract
In a
message dated
Oh,and don't ever let go of Robertson without
first giving me a shout. I paid over a hundred for mine at seminary. I have the
others you mentioned also, all purchased at marked-up prices. It's not that I am
all that upset, even seminary bookstores have to stay in business; but sometimes
I
Excuse me, Kevin, I did it to you
again.
- Original Message -
From:
Wm. Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:37
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perverting the
words of the living God
Okay, Terry, I'll do that in my quiet time,
Okay, Terry, I'll do that in my quiet time, while
reading,meditating upon, andlovingGod's Word.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:29
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perverting the
words of the
John wrote:
But they did not stop sinning. He did not make THAT
a requirement of apostleship.
I thought he made it a requirement of all disciples. Didn't he tell the
woman caught in adultery, go and sin no more? Didn't he tell us that
we must be perfect as our heavenly Father is perfect
John wrote:
Well done good and faithful servant.
It just struck me that I say these words to my
grand kids all the time. Matty, your coloring
is great (when , in fact, it leaves much to be
desired). Well done encourages me to continue,
to learn how to color between the lines, to sin
John wrote:
I Jo 1:8 makes a statement in greek, a present tense
statement: if we say that we are having no sin,
the truth is not within us.
all have sinned and are falling short of the glory
of God. [Romans 3:23?]
Hey, John, aren't you mangling these verses? The mood of these verbs
John wrote:
Because I have changed my mind about sin does not
eliminate sin from my life
(Rom 7:25, I John 1:8 , Ro 3:23)
Quoting other scriptures does not change the truth
expressed in those I offered to you.
Romans 7:25 is a summation of what it is like for the unregenerated
person
I'm "cleaning house" a little today and ran across
this post I saved from way back in February. My point of interest concerns the
"uncovering of Noah." I suggest you all look up the biblical connotations of
this term "to uncover." The offence was a bit more violating than anything so
DAVID SURPRISES!!!Christ insufficientChrist a minister of sin DO
BELIEVERS CONTINUE TO SIN? Before I RSVP please clarify what you mean. This
might just be huge. Lance
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 01, 2004 13:44
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Covenant versus
Lance wrote:
Before I RSVP please clarify what you mean.
My position is that Christ is sufficient; therefore, when we are found
in him, he is found living in us, and in Him is no sin.
And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins; and in him is
no sin. (1 John 3:5 KJV)
I am
THIS WORRIES ME. WHAT DAVID MILLER WROTE BELOW CANNOT BE SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVED UPON. I VERY SELDOM AGREE WITH DAVID MILLER. BECAUSE THE SUBJECT IS SO GRAVE, I WOULD SUGGEST YOU PRINT- OUT WHAT DAVID WROTE AND TAPE IT TO YOUR "REFRIGERATOR", AS THE IMPORT IS SO MAJOR THAT IT MAY MAKE A NEW MAN OUT
David: surely I'm misunderstanding you. Re-phrase, re-visit, play it again
David 'cause I'm about to laugh out loud. Lance
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 01, 2004 13:49
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Covenant versus Contract
John
Wm. Taylor wrote:
Excuse me, Kevin, I did it to you
again.
-
Original Message -
From:
Wm.
Taylor
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Thursday, April 01, 2004 11:37 AM
Subject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Perverting the words of the living God
Okay,
Elsman, I'm no theologian so you gonna' have to
'splain it simply. Lance
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 01, 2004 14:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Covenant versus
Contract--SAINTS, NOT SINNERS
THIS WORRIES ME.
I be lookin for scribbled out spots in the NT text.
Just funnin with Kevin. I am sorry a misused your name. I was thinking Kevin and
writing Terry. Can you ever forgive me }:)
bill
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Of course He is without sin. Are you? even though He is in you? We're missin
one another's meanin' right? Lance
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 01, 2004 14:07
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:DAVID SURPRISES (Maybe)
Lance wrote:
Have we been had?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 01, 2004 14:07
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:DAVID SURPRISES (Maybe)
Lance wrote:
Before I RSVP please clarify what you mean.
My position is that Christ is sufficient;
how is his Grammar(?); if you wake up in time, ask him
aboutthe Ap. Paulanyi's use of indicatives and imperatives (tell
himDrGTthinks it's easy to exegete, but others, less
brilliant,struggle to distinguish betwPaulanyi's head trips
andhis dreams..apparently that's whyhe's the populist'
I see Lance is thinking the same thing, my brother. We'll be praying for
you.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:18 PM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY???
Have we been had?
- Original Message
Someone had better check on John. He may have had a heart attack. This is
too much for me. What's it like for our older brother? I'm serious. Someone
pick up the phone and call him. Send me his number; I'll call him. John if
you're a part of this, then speak, speak NOW!
- Original Message
Elsman, Would you kindly turn down
the volume? We can all read normal typeset. We are not deaf, dumb or
blind. Or do you consider your points to be so insignificant that you must
SCREAM them out at us in HUGE RED LETTERS? Manners are sincerely appreciated
here as acts of love. Otherwise, I
Thank you for the information, g. Iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004
2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] knowing
Truth
how is his Grammar(?); if you wake up in time, ask him
LANCE,
SURE, I WILL EXPAND. I THOUGHT YOU GUYS WERE ALL CHRISTIANS, AND HAD WORKED OUT THESE SIMPLE PRELIMINARIES, AS I DO NOT ATTEND TO THIS LIST OFT, AND DO NOT KNOW THE COMPOSITION OF SUCH.
TAKE WHAT DAVID WROTE RE "HOLINESS" , PLUS ADD:
1. DOES THE HOLY SPIRIT DO A PERFECT WORK, OR, JUST
In a message dated 4/1/2004 5:15:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Elsman, Would you kindly turn down the volume? We can all read normal typeset. We are not deaf, dumb or blind. Or do you consider your points to be so insignificant that you must SCREAM them out at us in
Thank you kindly, Brother! Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004
4:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Covenant
versus Contract--SAINTS, NOT SINNERS
In a message dated 4/1/2004
In a message dated 4/1/2004 12:20:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John wrote:
I Jo 1:8 makes a statement in greek, a present tense
statement: "if we say that we are having no sin,
the truth is not within us."
"all have
In a message dated 4/1/2004 12:40:06 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
how is his Grammar(?); if you wake up in time, ask him about the Ap. Paulanyi's use of indicatives and imperatives (tell him DrGT thinks it's easy to exegete, but others, less brilliant, struggle to
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
