I saw that too. I wish him the best. Big loss for Rocket.
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Ross Ferris wrote:
> LinkedIn tells me Dan has moved on unless Google are making an MV
> play (think LaughIn " Very Interesting!" --> I'll forgo the "but
> stupid", 'cause I'm sure it is not!)
>
As I recall the 'other Unidata' is at the NIST, so being The Government, is
effectively legally untouchable.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Charles Stevenson wrote:
> & there's another outfit called "Unidata" in Colorado, too.
> It's part of a university or an NGO thing, maybe unifying data a
F.W. Davison does PEO/HR software.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:55 PM, jeffrey Butera wrote:
> Does anyone know much about FW Davidson http://www.fwdco.com?
>
> They came across my radar and I see references to Unidata along with SQL
> and Oracle. Just curious if anyone know precisely what soluti
n untouched for re-use down the chain of
> those remaining routines.
>
>
>
> Peter Cheney
> Ultracs Developer
> t 07 3017 8837 | f 07 3002 8400
> e peter.che...@firstmac.com.au
> w firstmac.com.au
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2
Anybody ever seen anything like this before:
1523926:error:0D0890A1:asn1 encoding routines:ASN1_verify:unknown message
digest algorithm:a_verify.c:141:
1523926:error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate
verify failed:s3_clnt.c:844:
This is displaying on a routine when it
ering '=DOITALL' as a command.
>
> The editor will then loop through the list of records, perform the
> change for each of them, file each of them, and then run =DOITALL again
> on the next record.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug
Unreal. This old dog just learnt a new trick.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Daniel McGrath
wrote:
> A tip my original mentor taught me on the first day was that in ED/AE, the
> back tick (`) gets treated as an empty line so you can keep going in insert
> mode and not need to worry about it.
>
Well now... this is getting interesting. Wol has a very valid point.
Assumptions can be deadly. Hence why I called Will out on his. It's
minor in the sense of this dialogue, but if when customers are putting up
money for the end result assumptions and misunderstanding can be the
difference betw
t, what is the last
> Thursday of
> ":month:" ":year)
>
> Hmmm - I guess that's why I don't code anymore ;)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org]
> On Behalf Of Kevi
I'd as this list!Does that count?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 8:15 AM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] [OT] Intervie
Adding the week number was no big deal. That's a pretty nifty bit of code
there man. Thanks for sharing.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Kevin King wrote:
> I ran it through dates from 01 Jan 13 to 31 Dec 2099 and it works
> perfectly. Now I just need to adjust it to include the
I ran it through dates from 01 Jan 13 to 31 Dec 2099 and it works
perfectly. Now I just need to adjust it to include the date in the format
-ww.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 14/12/13 19:44, Kevin King wrote:
> > I'll have to run this through so
I'll have to run this through some testing, as it's definitely simpler than
the solution I came up with.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 14/12/13 19:20, Kevin King wrote:
> > The 8601 week is based on the count of Thursdays but the week starts on
&
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 14/12/13 18:53, Kevin King wrote:
> > The most challenging date math we've faced recently (a real project) is
> the
> > ISO 8601 week calculation. Extremely easy to introduce an off-by-one
> error!
> >
>
The most challenging date math we've faced recently (a real project) is the
ISO 8601 week calculation. Extremely easy to introduce an off-by-one error!
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Wols Lists wrote:
> On 14/12/13 16:48, Dan Fitzgerald wrote:
> > Kevin: I'd take the month (verifying; gigo),
gt;
> > > > Please email me in regards to your ads. I am currently in between
> > > > contracts/assignments/projects and looking for my next assignment.
> > > > Multivalue languages I have been programming in:
> > > >
> > > > * CACHE (la
QMBASIC)
> > * PICK, Advanced PICK, D3 (language: PICK BASIC)
> > * Power95 (language: DATA/BASIC, DATABASIC, DATA BASIC)
> > * REALITY System (language: DATA/BASIC, DATABASIC, DATA BASIC)
> > * REVELATION, Advanced REVELATION (language: R/BASIC, REVELATION BASIC)
> > * U
UNIVERSE (language: UNIVERSE BASIC)
> * UNIVISION (language: UVBASIC)
> * WebSphere DataStage (language: DSBASIC, DataStage BASIC)
>
> Robert Norman, Multivalue Programmer/Analyst
> (951) 541-1668
>
> On 10/7/2013 7:35 PM, Kevin King wrote:
> > This is not specifically a j
There are certain situations where a fix file is not generated. Usually
this happens with bad backward links in dynamic files, but there are other
situations as well. In this case, the only solution is to create a new
file, copy what you can get, clear the original, and copy the records back.
O
m is either a local file OR something in DMSECURITY that itself
> is account specific.
>
>
> JRI
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org ] On Behalf Of Kevin
> King
> Sent: Tuesday,
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 12:36 AM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: [U2] Mysterious Error Message
>
> John
John, look for [E115]. That's how the error will appear in the SB+
routines. I'm guessing that the problem is that RB is connecting to SB
through the install accounts but DMSECURITY is being referenced locally,
hence the checksum mismatch.
On Monday, November 25, 2013, Israel, John R. wrote:
>
I believe the program that generates that message is MM in DM. The error
signifies that the calculated checksum in the DMSECURITY record is not
correct for the version of SB+ in use.
On Monday, November 25, 2013, Israel, John R. wrote:
> Amy,
>
> I do have a pointer to ECL_PHPARMS.
>
> Putting a
Yeah, I noticed last time I was in the city that Epicor has an office
downtown in the black tower of doom, same neighborhood where Unidata lived
for a while.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Hilk, Brandon wrote:
> They have a building just outside Minneapolis as well. Not sure which
> business
; If you give them their first programming job
> they will leave
>
> The trick is finding people to whom you are
> giving them their *last* programming job.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin King
> To: U2 Users List
> Sent: Fri, Oct
Unfortunately, in one case I hired a friend. Needless to say, it was
>>> one of the worst decisions I've made. Not only lost a friend, but
>>> lost a lot of customer confidence by her attitude, poor workmanship,
>>> and unwillingness to adapt.
>>>
>
oug
> www.u2logic.com
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Kevin King
> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, in one case I hired a friend. Needless to say, it was one
> > of the worst decisions I've made. Not only lost a friend, but lost a lot
> >
> Wow, seen a lot of that and managers trying to get friends hired to create
> a perfect office society.
>
>
> quit hiring backstabbing chaff
>> with their own agendas.
>>
>
> Robert
> - Original Message - From: "Kevin King"
> To: "Susan
ew was a little washed
out. Thanks to everyone who has (and will) respond to this. It's most
helpful.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Kevin King wrote:
> Rex, copious thanks. Great information.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Rex Gozar wrote:
>
>> Kevin,
>>
Rex, copious thanks. Great information.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Rex Gozar wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> You want people who are smart and get things done --
> http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog73.html
>
> rex
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Brian Leach
> wrote:
> > Kevin
>
TG, I hired a guy with copious MV skill. He came on strong and then just
one day decided that he was smarter than everyone else and didn't want to
do the tasks that he was assigned. Unbelievable waste of an otherwise
talented resource.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Tony Gravagno <3xk547...@sn
David, I'm a company of < 10. HR, technology, hell, even vacuuming the
facility falls to moi.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:27 PM, David A. Green wrote:
> Why not let HR handle the personality questions and background checks,
> that's what they do. That leaves you to concentrate on their technical
Susan, yes. I've been very open in my interviews, and it's netted
significantly regrettable results. So this time I'm going for people who
can get behind and contribute to the common cause as soon after hire as
possible. I don't have any aspirations of hiring for life, though I
certainly do ende
iginal Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2013 1:36 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: [U2] [OT] Interview Questions
>
> This is not specifically a job posting, but
This is not specifically a job posting, but I do have ads up on Monster and
LinkedIn looking for talent.
At the risk of confessing too much, I have historically been far too easy
in the interview process. As a result, I have had some less-than-excellent
hires and spent far too much time and money
Isn't there something that strips the symbol table during compile? If the
symbol table were suppressed the D might not appear because it couldn't do
much anyway, right?
On Oct 2, 2013 11:53 AM, "George Gallen" wrote:
> I Don't know? I never really looked into the PTERM signals.
>
> I would think
We are here, we are here, we are HERE!!
You'd never know my kids are grown. :)
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Allen Egerton wrote:
> Pong.
>
> (Allen - Sent from my paperweight)
>
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 10:01 PM, "Michael Spencer"
> wrote:
>
> > Test.
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
>
Well, that's unfortunate. But a quick web search turned up this:
Colorado Hospital Association
Attn: Human Resources
7335 East Orchard Road
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
I'm sure there's an email address somewhere too, I just didn't look that
far. Knowing a bit about CHA, this would be a pretty e
John, the "slash intercept" process is at /HK.CONTROL, on the F5 screen I
believe.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Israel, John R. <
johnisr...@daytonsuperior.com> wrote:
> We are looking to somehow tap into the SB security to add our own logic
> that would always run when a process is fired off
g for
> some way to speed up a report that I am creating with Uniquery.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:43 AM
> To: U2 Users L
My guess is that it shouldn't matter. Each multivalue in a list gets a
separate index entry.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Lunt, Bruce wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Will indexing a field that I retrieve with BY-EXP be faster than an
> un-indexed field?
>
> Thanks,
> Bruce
>
honys Lists wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 21:12, Kevin King wrote:
>
>> We have a customer that has a program (and associated subroutines) that
>> has
>> not been modified in a good long while. Just this past week it started
>> blowing up with a memory failure and segfault
ch will point to a culprit user or process.
>
> SB code - unless you code your own subroutines or generate code /GC - are
> interpreted.
>
> Otherwise I recommend checking files and indexes for corruption. BASIC
> catalog used can become corrupt just like any other data, it's in
We have a customer that has a program (and associated subroutines) that has
not been modified in a good long while. Just this past week it started
blowing up with a memory failure and segfault at different times in the
process. Unidata was recently restarted.
I'm suspecting that some bit of code
Try setting @ACTION to 2 in addition to setting the @KEY and reading
@RECORD. See if that helps..
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Al DeWitt wrote:
> I am creating a simple screen. Two fields. The Before Process in the
> Definition defines @KEY, reads @RECORD and loads @RECORD<6> into @WORK<
I've never used OPENSEQ on a remote drive like that. I presume you can
LIST LRGLBRVARS @ TCL without difficulty right? If so, I would think the
OPENSEQ should work with that just fine. May I also presume that you looed
at FNAME and a file with that name really does exist in that directory file?
Or as we say it here: "The way you write code today will determine the
words used to describe you six months from now".
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Wjhonson wrote:
> To me the purpose is that
> -- it helps when reading the code
>
> If more effort is spent on the next programmer
> understa
Charles, if you're not on 7.3 the built-in JSON parser isn't going to help
much. In that case, I may be able to help you out. We move lots of JSON
between Unidata and our Red Leaf web portal.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:19 PM, wrote:
> Very good advice. I did know that XML support was built-in
Martin, that's actually one of my standards. Due to the ambiguity of
several characters, most notably <, >, and =, we use EQ, NE, LT, LE, GT,
and GE for comparison and use <> for array extraction and replacement and =
for assignment. Except in SB+, which doesn't allow such critters. And
kudos fo
There is only one truth, and it's false (0 or "").
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Larry Hiscock wrote:
> UniData treats WITH fieldname as the equivalent of WITH fieldname > "".
> Both 1 and 0 would be selected, the empty string would not.
>
> Larry Hiscock
> Western Computer Services
>
>
For me it was more of a concern when there were new players entering the
market. As we haven't really seen any new MV platforms in a good long
while it seems like this is much less of a concern.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Tony Gravagno <3xk547...@sneakemail.com>wrote:
> > From: Wjhonson
>
I picked up that trick from some old code may years ago, and haven't used
it in a while since @TRUE and @FALSE have been available on Unidata and
Universe, but you may be seeing some of my old code. As far as I have
seen, TRUE is usually 1 on MV platforms, but at the time I started writing
that bi
I agree with Dave, SPLIT/MERGE ratios need to be checked.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dave Laansma
wrote:
> Agreed, the first step is to create the file so there are as many DAT
> files as necessary and only one or two OVER files. Once you've done that,
> copied all of the records over to
Wouldn't a simple startup script suffice - like in /etc/init.d/rc*x*.d
(depending on Linux)?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Perry Taylor wrote:
> What techniques are you folks using to start up apps when UniVerse on
> Linux is started? Obviously hooking into uv.rc is an option. Are there
>
My thinking is that while it is a solid idea, it would be an uphill battle
at best. There are several challenges. First, how to represent the
business rules so that they are clearly communicated to and through
non-technical personnel. Second, to ensure that the human readable
business rules are
The Colorado Multivalue Users Group usually has a GotoMeeting available;
check with Dan Schmitt for connection details.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:48 PM, William Brutzman wrote:
> Dan:
>
> Easy for me to say... Perhaps a video stream is possible from there...
>
> --Bill
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013
Vmark + Unidata = Ardent -> Informix -> IBM - Rocket, right?
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:12 PM, David Taylor wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, there was another company in between Vmark and IBM.
>
> I believe (and there may have been some smoke and mirrors in all this)
> that Informatics "acquired" A
May I presume this is Unidata? Make sure everyone is logged off when the
index is rebuilt.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:46 PM, david yu wrote:
> hello,
>
> We have a file that is updated almost every minute for transportation
> appointment, we index a field in a file to make the reporting much fa
Al brings up a good point though... Where would one find what error 9 means
exactly? I scanned the documentation and didn't see any mention of an
error 9 for WRITESEQ or even described in STATUS() which is where a lot of
the IO errors show up.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Wjhonson wrote:
>
log
files appears has had very positive results so far.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Kevin King wrote:
> I'm on a client's site today trying to get a working ODBC connection to a
> Unidata server running 7.1.19. The connection works fine for one request,
> then from that
I'm on a client's site today trying to get a working ODBC connection to a
Unidata server running 7.1.19. The connection works fine for one request,
then from that point on we get either error 81001 or 81002 for about 5
minutes and then it begins to work again. Has anyone else experienced this
and
Good stuff Tony.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
I actually agree with Tony but for a number of different reasons. Sure,
there are some who won't go to FB or Twitter or Linked In, and that's
perfectly fine, but there are others who will. More importantly, I believe
there is value in having the widest swath of distributed information out
there f
I would think flushing the input buffer in either location would be
sufficient, assuming the problem is as you described. I've seen situations
where there's something in the second field, for example, that is data
stacking something new and the data stacking from the gun is conflicting
with that.
id=swg21179559
>
> HTH.
>
> Regards,
> Brian.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Thursday, 21 February 2013 8:35 AM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject:
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:23 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] AIX 5.3 IBMIHS Web Server
>
> I tried checking for a default certificate and it report
server.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2013 10:03
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] AIX 5.3 IBMIHS Web Server
>
> Yes, I have both the LoadModule and Listen, though my Listen is
> unqualified, li
ry responsive.
>
> -John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 4:03 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] AIX 5.3 IBMI
tempt to browse to port 443?
>
> -John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:04 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] AIX 5.3 IBMIHS Web Se
is12.momtex.com
>
> Options +Includes
> AddType text/html .shtml
> AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtml
>
>
> KeyFile "C:/IBM/HTTPServer/key.kdb"
> SSLDisable
>
> -John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2u
Might anyone have any tips or tricks for getting SSL to work on the
IBMIHS/Apache 2.0.47 web server on an AIX 5.3 box? The documentation I've
found on the web is byzantine at best and it would be fine if the commands
actually worked, but I keep getting odd error messages and stalled at every
turn.
This is somewhat described in "Submitting a Request" on page 62 of the
Unidata 7.1 UniBASIC Extensions manual, where it states:
*For a POST request with non-empty post_data, the data is attached to the
request message as is. No encoding is performed, and any parameters added
through addRequestPara
+1. Well stated.
On Thursday, February 7, 2013, Woodward, Bob wrote:
> In an active user session where users are obtaining a lock for a length
> of time, you're right. There are lots of times, though, that lock
> intervention is not a benefit. It all depends on the need of the
> application and
ocketsoftware.com
> u2supp...@rocketsoftware.com
> ____
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] on behalf of Kevin King
> [ke...@precisonline.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:16 PM
> To: U2 Users Li
server.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wols Lists
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:33 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1.13/AIX 5.3 Stops Unexpectedly
>
> On 18/01/13 03:18, Kevin King wrote:
> > Peter, I'm 1200+ miles away from the box. Getting to the
Peter, I'm 1200+ miles away from the box. Getting to the console is not an
option. To restart, I've been forcing Unidata down with stopud -f and
starting it again with startud. Yeah, drastic, I know. But that's why I'm
looking for better ways.
___
U2-
log. See man errpt for
> details.
>
> That would be a good place to start
>
> Kevin King wrote:
>
>> We have a customer with a box as described in the subject that has
>> recently
>> been experiencing something odd. Overnight, the system will just lock up
>> an
We have a customer with a box as described in the subject that has recently
been experiencing something odd. Overnight, the system will just lock up
and stop responding. Normally there isn't anyone doing anything at night;
the backup runs, that sort of thing, but then some days when they come in
The problem is that the characters for the insert key enable a mode in
SBClient that causes things to display as you're seeing. Normally in SB+
the characters are captured and not displayed on the screen, but @ real
TCL, the characters are echoed back to SBClient and the mode is enabled. I
have n
e. With it, the program would work flawlessly but if I
> took it back out, or commented it out, the odd behavior returned.
>
> BobW
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Ki
We have a customer who has a system that was rebooted a couple days ago.
Since then, and only in one certain subroutine, when doing an MCU
conversion on a multivalued list, the ASCII 253 value marks are replaced
with ASCII 221. Understanding that the difference between an lower and
upper case A i
TonyG wrote:
*Profile your skills as a problem solver who can get qualified people to
write code, rather than competing with a million people who can write code
but can't solve real world business problems. Sell your understanding of
business rules, because this is an area where you excel compared
t;
> David A. Green
> (480) 813-1725
> DAG Consulting
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 3:55 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re:
vide some important clues.
>
> David A. Green
> (480) 813-1725
> DAG Consulting
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 8:55 PM
&
Well, one mystery solved. If the file name ends in .PEM, the below code
will show information about the cert. The addCertificate (in another
thread) still does not find the certificate, even named with a PEM or pem
extension.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Kevin King wrote:
> Correct
Correction: analyzeCertificate returns a status of 1. It's the
addCertificate that's returning a status of 2. In either case they mean
the same thing - the certificate cannot be found.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Kevin King wrote:
> Unidata 7.1: I have a PEM-formatted c
Unidata 7.1: I have a PEM-formatted certificate in _PH_ called TEST.CERT,
with the begin and end comments at the top and bottom of the text. This
code cannot find it:
CERT.PATH = '_PH_/TEST.CERT'
STATUS = analyzeCertificate(CERT.PATH,1,RESULT)
CRT STATUS
This is a second attempt at trying to fig
CERT", 2, 1, 1, SEC.CONTEXT)
>
> David A. Green
> (480) 813-1725
> DAG Consulting
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 11:07 AM
. Green
> (480) 813-1725
> DAG Consulting
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 11:07 AM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: [U2] Acces
e-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: October-19-12 2:07 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: [U2] Accessing an https:// server with callHTTP
>
> Does anyone have a working sample of co
s Inc.
> www.campana.com
> Office: +1.800.463.2688 x286
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:
> u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: October-19-12 2:07 PM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subjec
Does anyone have a working sample of communicating with an https server
from Unidata 7.1 using callHTTP? We've pulled the certificate and put it
on the server, but every time we try to use addCertificate() we get error
2: "Certificate file could not be opened or directory does not exist."
Must be
I can't say definitively, but I would expect the answer to be 'no'.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Jeffrey Butera wrote:
> Stupid question of the day on unidata 7.2.x
>
> I build indexes all over to speed queries - I have plenty of disk to burn.
> However does having an index help when sorting
ur that the
> option turns off and lost the argument about whether this was a
> feature-not-a-bug rather than a bug-not-a-feature
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserve
I just found this in the UDT.OPTIONS manual...
"If UDT.OPTIONS 107 is off, UniData returns incorrect multivalues from the
target file."
Here's my question. With that description in mind, why would anyone want
this to be off?
___
U2-Users mailing list
U
Rather than data stacking, can you do this:
EXECUTE 'SB.LOGIN user,password,terminal'
Where the lower case stuff is the appropriate user, password, and term type?
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Susan Joslyn wrote:
> Hi geniuses!
> I know that in Unidata there is a udt options flag that allow
ut I would be surprised that the compiler would
> catch the double usage.
>
> I've used the initial techniques with existing select lists. How list 0
> behaves while it's still building is an interesting test. I would like it
> to
> work - but am not really surprised that i
m> wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> Got it, and you don't want to or can't READNEXT thru and create your own
> list and save it to file of our choice then
> read it back in and use. I know it seems like you should not have to do
> that but I have used this in the past.
>
>
> Geo
-----Original Message- From: Kevin King Sent: Monday, September 24,
> 2012 1:01 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 7.1.16 Multiple
> Active Select Lists
> Bob, this is exactly what I'm attempting, to save the current 0 list and
> restore it. David, checking the list b
he active list.
>
> Just a thought.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
> [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 10:43 AM
> To: U2 Users List
> Subject: Re: [U2] Unida
1 - 100 of 1012 matches
Mail list logo
