RE: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET
The only thing I can say about this is that your boss is actually doing you a favor in forcing you to learn this "stuff". Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Lienhoop Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:32 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET Makes me laugh, I've only preaching the same thing (about getting experienced help) since January. But my boss doesn't seem to think hiring developers either as consultants or staff is worthwhile. He expects me to learn this stuff. So while I'm here I will and I want to do the best I can. In the meantime, I do feel that I understand the basics of how to pull data out. I'm more worried about how I'm managing the sessions and trying to implement a connection pool. I've already requested a demo of mv.NET simply because they promise data binding to .net controls and connection pooling. But is there anyway I could create my own connection pool? Jonathan Lienhoop Marvin Johnson & Associates, Inc. 1.800.457.5255 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 12:11 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET Jonathan: The only advice I can give is to get some __HELP__. This kind of development environment is extremely complex and not for the faint of heart! Sure, you can create a single web service, or a single program, but when one starts working more with this technology it becomes clear that all kinds of experience is necessary in order to come close to optimizing any "solution". There are a myriad of complex structures usually required in this environment. Consequently, by the time one normally gets familiar with a technology, the technology changes and the learning cycle begins anew. This is completely contrary to the original concept of MV development, and to rational software development for that matter. There is a product called mv.NET which encapsulates a great deal of this "experience" into their product. It allows regular .NET developers, who are mostly unaware of an MV environment (so to speak), to work with an MV dbms. However, to work with an MV dbms, in a more "MV" way, one has to know about the MV infrastructure and how these "middleware" products interface with MV. Again, mv.NET is very useful for this. We have two different .NET web applications as part of our enterprise solution. One was written in C# in a more "object oriented" manner by .NET development consultants. This application took about a thousand hours (yes, that's 1,000 hours) to design, code, test, document, and deploy. The other was written by me in VB.NET. It's a more understandable structure, similar to an MV structure, where subroutines are either local or global depending on their need, variables are grouped the same way, pages are grouped logically depending on their function (instead of their OO structure), the dbms is used extensively to hold information, and many of the .NET tools, required to overcome basic design flaws, are not implemented. This application took 30 hours to design, code, test, document, and deploy in D3's FlashConnect (and it ran flawlessly for 24 months). It took about 150 hours to do the same in this .NET application (I also needed to pay a .NET consultant $5K to set up some unintelligible "objects" and structures within the application). This particular application is pretty easy to manage and is about 1/2 the complexity of the first, more "object oriented", .NET application referred to above (notice the cost differences). So, if you're just needing a quick solution to an immediate problem, working on this by yourself can work fine. If you need a more complex solution to a more complex problem, like building a "connection pool", you definitely need help. Even if you buy mv.NET to solve your connection pooling problems, you still need some help to install, configure, and implement the service. Hope this helps a little. :-) Bill >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Jonathan Lienhoop >Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:38 PM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: [U2] Learning Uniobjects.NET > >I am new to .NET and uniobjects for .net and have been given the task of >writing a web based program that can pull data out of our universe >database. I am running AIX 5.2 Universe 10.1.7. My question is to make >sure I'm using session's and files appropriately. > >1st - Is there anyway to implement something like connection pooling in >a C# .NET 2005 web application?? So far I have read that it only works >in a windows application.
RE: [U2] Socket API problem
All of your suggestions are very good, the problem is that all of these solutions will introduce too much overhead. I know that a lot of the overhead is very, very minimal, but we cannot afford ANY overhead at all. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bennett Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 6:38 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Socket API problem Hi Nick, I don't have an answer to your licensing problem, but have you considered running your listener from inetd or a similar superserver? In this setup your inetd daemon (or service on windows) listens on your known port, when a request comes in the superserver starts a UV process to handle the incoming request (received on stdin so get the data with INPUT or GETS) send your response using print. This is slightly slower per request than prestarting all your phantoms but you only use as many licences as your peak load and if you have one of the more advanced inetd versions you can limit the maximum number of simultaneous requests (other requests will be queued by inetd). I have implemented a HTTP server using this setup and other than the uv licensing cost it works well. regards, Craig --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Socket API problem
Hello All, We are currently stuck at version 10.1 of Universe because IBM has changed what causes a UV license to be consumed. In versions 10.1 on older versions, phantom processes do not require a separate universe license. As of version 10.2, this is no longer the case. Phantom processes will require a user license in order to run. This is a problem for us, because we currently run thousands of phantom processes to process transactions, real-time. Now you may say, well it is only fair that you should have to pay for each of these processes because they are essentially the same thing as a user session. We are interacting with the data through these phantoms. The reason we have to run so many processes is because of how Universe has implemented the socket API. Here is how I'm hoping someone on the list might be able to help me, or correct me on my understanding of how the socket API works. If my understanding is correct, the universe socket API does not allow the listener to pass of the socket connection to another process for processing and response. The process that is listening on a port and accepts the connection, is also the process that must answer. This is not typically how a socket service works. Typically, you have a process listening on a port, and when you receive a connection, the connection is passed off to another process for processing and response. So, unless my understanding of how this works is incorrect, we have to run so many phantoms because the Universe socket API is not set up to handle multiple connections on a single port. We actually have an F5 load balancer that accepts the connections on a single port and passes it off to one of the many phantoms that is listening on a unique port. I have two questions: 1. Is there anyone out there that is in the same boat we are? Is anyone else stuck on version 10.1 or older because they cannot afford to upgrade to 10.2 because of the licensing requirements? 2. Is my understanding of how the universe socket API works correct? If so, has anyone come up with a way around this limitation? Keep in mind, we currently process 95% of our transactions in 1/10th of a second. Thanks, Nick Cipollina MCTS, MCP ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804) 965-8294 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance
Yeah, I played around with it, and the overhead that is added is typically a couple hundred milliseconds. That is not much, but we typically get responses from our existing processes in .005 seconds, those couple hundred milliseconds make a huge difference. I should clarify my statement, the performance for a typical app is sufficient, but not for what we are doing. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:54 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance Nick: We've developed an application in .NET using mv.NET to connect to UniData and the connectivity is screaming fast. A complete .NET developer does all our development and we do all the dbms design and implementation. The dbms development and connectivity gets done in no-time while the .NET takes quite a bit of time and requires a lot of patience. :-) Bill >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina >Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:29 PM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > >--Not quite so easy to go .net <-> UniVerse. > >Well put. This is one of the issues we are running into. We >are a .Net shop, and going from .Net to UV has been a challenge >to say the least. The primary issue being the overhead associated >with access the data via uo.net. Performance just isn't good enough. > >Thanks, > >Nick Cipollina --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance
Bill, If you are using MV.NET, it has its own connection pooling which is pretty well documented. That being the case, you don't even need to use the UO.NET built in connection pooling. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 9:49 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance Phil: A quick example is I'm trying to find out how their Connection Pool license works. Noone seems to know nor can I find out how this integrates with mv.Net using UO.NET as the connection. I can't find out how to configure a connection pool, monitor the connections, or anything else. [sigh] :-( Bill >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker >Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:56 PM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > >Leroy, > >I know IBM are implementing much of these new technologies with regard >to U2. The problem that I see is that it may be there, but a lot of the >people in the list cannot find information on how to use it either >because this information > >* does not exist >* exists but in very basic examples which do not show > a 'real' business solution, e.g. order processing or > something similar >* exists but they do not have access to it .e.g. IBM Knowledgebase... > >Those are the issues as I see it. How to tie up the >Webservices,Soap,XML schemas etc, triggers, and existing >BASIC subroutines. And what is good and bad practice. > >Cheers, > >Phil. > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LeRoy Dreyfuss >Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2007 11:45 a.m. >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > >These are interesting comments considering all the tools available with >IBM U2 and the many things they have in the hopper. > >Regards, > >LeRoy > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina >Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 6:49 AM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > >This is one of the reasons that Cache is able to drum up some business >from shops that are using Universe, UniData, etc... Cache is very >forward thinking, and now with their mvbasic support, a viable option >for those of us using MV databases and want to use newer >technologies to integrate with the database. Cache's native >web service support is very cool, not to mention the .Net and >java integration. This is the direction IBM needs to be heading >in with U2 if they want to stay a viable option. > >Thanks, > >Nick Cipollina --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance
--Not quite so easy to go .net <-> UniVerse. Well put. This is one of the issues we are running into. We are a .Net shop, and going from .Net to UV has been a challenge to say the least. The primary issue being the overhead associated with access the data via uo.net. Performance just isn't good enough. Thanks, Nick Cipollina CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance
This is one of the reasons that Cache is able to drum up some business from shops that are using Universe, UniData, etc... Cache is very forward thinking, and now with their mvbasic support, a viable option for those of us using MV databases and want to use newer technologies to integrate with the database. Cache's native web service support is very cool, not to mention the .Net and java integration. This is the direction IBM needs to be heading in with U2 if they want to stay a viable option. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 4:22 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance Nick, Here, here to your following statements To me, this is part of the problem that we have in the MV world. We look at how things are being done elsewhere and say, "Pick does it better, we aren't going to do that." The problem with this approach is that everyone else is adopting these standards and using them. We are going to be left further behind if we don't start using some of the technologies available to us. . And this is where this list breaks down in that a lot of the new features IBM are building into the product are not used/discussed and the documentation is VERY, VERY sparse. So people like myself and a few others are left to trial and error techniques to implement these new technologies because we HAVE to talk to the outside world and people expect some sort of standard method to do this. Because of this approach we take a lot longer to do something which I am sure is reasonably easy if one was to have good quality examples available like most other dbms/development environments have on the web.... Phil (my 2c) Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 11:22 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance I do understand the advantages to that approach, Nick. But that was also the thinking of those who prepared the current industry benchmarks by locking in on SQL. My concern was that if you specify technologies, you can make it difficult for solutions that are outside the box. --dawn On 7/16/07, Nick Cipollina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the consumer of this data is going to be external, then I would > definitely use web services. Using a standard format (SOAP) will make > it possible for anyone to consume the data. > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 4:58 PM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: Re: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > > Yes, agreed. I think if you start with user requirements for services, > then have folks design for those requirements according to each > environment, that would be a good start. I hesitate to say that it > must be "web services" only because that might imply use of SOAP or an > XML exchange that could prejudice the implementation, but otherwise > defining the requirements as services makes a lot of sense. Each > service implementation in different environments can then be judged > and compared by a variety of measures. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance
On one hand, if the purpose of exposing this data is for internal consumption only, then some sort of proprietary format would be perfectly acceptable. In fact, we are using a sort of proprietary format for communication. The problem with this approach is that when you begin dealing with outside organizations, your proprietary way of communicating is no longer that clever. This is when using a standard protocol, such as SOAP, really has value. To me, this is part of the problem that we have in the MV world. We look at how things are being done elsewhere and say, "Pick does it better, we aren't going to do that." The problem with this approach is that everyone else is adopting these standards and using them. We are going to be left further behind if we don't start using some of the technologies available to us. On an unrelated note, we interviewed a .Net developer that worked for a company that also had a UniData shop in house. He was telling us about this custom interface they used in communcations. He didn't know anything about it's origins, except that you had variable length records delimited by "funny" looking characters. I asked him if the characters were ASCII 253, 254 and 255 characters, and he said in fact that he thought they were. The moral of the story, not really sure, I just thought it was kind of funny. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 11:22 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance I do understand the advantages to that approach, Nick. But that was also the thinking of those who prepared the current industry benchmarks by locking in on SQL. My concern was that if you specify technologies, you can make it difficult for solutions that are outside the box. --dawn On 7/16/07, Nick Cipollina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the consumer of this data is going to be external, then I would > definitely use web services. Using a standard format (SOAP) will make > it possible for anyone to consume the data. > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 4:58 PM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: Re: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > > Yes, agreed. I think if you start with user requirements for services, > then have folks design for those requirements according to each > environment, that would be a good start. I hesitate to say that it > must be "web services" only because that might imply use of SOAP or an > XML exchange that could prejudice the implementation, but otherwise > defining the requirements as services makes a lot of sense. Each > service implementation in different environments can then be judged > and compared by a variety of measures. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance
If the consumer of this data is going to be external, then I would definitely use web services. Using a standard format (SOAP) will make it possible for anyone to consume the data. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 4:58 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance Yes, agreed. I think if you start with user requirements for services, then have folks design for those requirements according to each environment, that would be a good start. I hesitate to say that it must be "web services" only because that might imply use of SOAP or an XML exchange that could prejudice the implementation, but otherwise defining the requirements as services makes a lot of sense. Each service implementation in different environments can then be judged and compared by a variety of measures. I'm starting to get that "fear of being tossed to u2-community" vibe when typing this... Time for some chocolate, perhaps. --dawn On 7/16/07, Marc Harbeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's why I suggested a web service method - by which each db could > employ whatever methodologies they have available - where the front end > could run the same transaction sets thru different back end API sets. > > An example API might be "Book Order" or "Ship Order" for example. > > I would imagine a full suite of transaction tests would also include the > transactions to populate a "test" database with objects such as > "Customers" "Items" etc etc. > > Just a thought. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoffrey > Mitchell > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:47 PM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: Re: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance > > > How does not being able to know how the data is stored prohibit > empirical testing? As long as you can provide inputs to a system and > retrieve outputs you can perform empirical tests. > > -- > Geoffrey Mitchell > Programmer/Analyst > Home Decorator's Collection > 314-684-1062 > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > -- Dawn M. Wolthuis Tincat Group, Inc. tincat-group.com Take and give some delight today --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance
I agree. Trying to compare a relational database (such as SQL Server) and a post-relational database (such as UniData) is like trying to compare apples and oranges. Your best bet is to analyze how you are going to use the data, and pick the database that can handle those needs. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 10:27 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UniData 7.1 vs. MS SQL 2005 performance Hi Robert Performance Benchmarking needs to be aligned with a business measure. Most performance benchmarks are done on the basis of Simple transactions per second. However where U2 realy bolts ahead is in complex transactions per second. In the realworld we have complex transactions, not always the simple Dr,Cr of a general ledger. A transaction will often involve various business rules and accessing multiple files for checks and process tables. With most RDBMS as the complexity increases, the more likely they will have to resort to processing outside of the database which causes a performance hit. With U2, the processing remains inside the database where basic code resides. Hence before doing performance benchmarking, make sure that the benchmarking represents the business process. It is like using a ferrari to delive furniture, it may be fast but it is the wrong vehicle for the job. Regards David Jordan > Is anyone aware of any performance benchmarks for UniData 7.1? How does > it stack up against SQL 2005? > > > Robert K. Kubarych > Network Services > Bergen Community College > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UniObjects .NET - Security Best Practices, Connection Pooling in UD
You could use a service on another server inside your firewall that does all of the universe access. Then your web app would only be able to communicate with that service. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Kubarych Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:54 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UniObjects .NET - Security Best Practices, Connection Pooling in UD Does anyone have any security best practices for building web applications using UniObjects for .NET? I've placed the connection string in web.config and encrypted it, as well as created a separate remote account with a stripped down VOC. The only data files that can be accessed from this separate remote are the two that the application needs to access (via pointers the main remote account). I also tried to dial down the asp.net trust level runs with, but it seems that uniobjects for .net needs to run with full trust. I guess it's not possible to use connection pooling until UniData 7.1. We are still on UniData 6.1. Is there some other method I could use to limit the number of licenses the web application can grab? Thanks in advance for any pointers. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UO.Net & Connection Pooling
First question, do you have a reference to the UODOTNET assembly in your web site or application? I'm not familiar with the connection pooling in UO.NET, but I do know you need to have a reference to the assembly in your project. You also need to define the config section in your config file. An example is the following from the Enterprise Library application blocks: So you should have something similar at the top of your config file that would look like this: If you can find this info, your application will recognize this custom configuration section. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:37 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UO.Net & Connection Pooling I'm trying to figure out how to use UO.NET's connection pooling mechanism. I'm using mv.NET, which uses UO.NET as a connection method. I've purchased a "Connection Pooling" license for UD v7.1.9 (Windows). According to the documentation, "The following illustrates a configuration file for connection pooling. This configuration file is named either app.config or web.config." When I include this section of code into the .NET "web.config" file my project won't compile due to "" being an "Unrecognized configuration section." I'm wondering if anyone can explain how all this works together (and how to use it). Thanks, Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Soap Pt 2
I ran into the same issue. What I ended up doing was writing my own subroutine to make web service calls. It is nothing more than a socket call on a given port and IP address expecting a specific packet. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry-u2ug Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:33 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Soap Pt 2 Calling a webservice using SoapSetParameters , SoapSubmitRequest There seems to be a limit of about 16K where any parameters exceeding this size get jumbled up - using SoapRequestWrite it looks like some sort of buffer overwrite going on. I can get around this by manually building the entire soap message and using SoapSetRequestContent() but is there any way to increase this limit , 16K is pretty small for say any non-trivial xml document ? Gerry --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE
Time Outed? What? What, are you in first grade? Gosh! You gonna eat your tots? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Bessel Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:00 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE Yeah I do, but that would be because I am. I'm just getting kind of TO'ed now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:33 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE You think you are so much smarter than the rest of us don't you? Go fix yourself a dang quesadilla! Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Bessel Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:13 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE Well, I would hope that you would know that, Mr. UniBasic Smarty-Pants Who Thinks He's So Smart And by the way it's "could EVEN know that", not "could EVER know that". Gosh! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:48 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE Like anyone could ever know that! Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Bessel Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 1:11 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE Use the write ON ERROR clause to display info about the error using STATUS, FILEINFO, etc. Any time that I've ever encountered an abort in a BASIC program due to a write error, it's given me the source code line #. I can then look at the source code to see what file was being written to and start my investigation there. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Joslyn Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:33 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE When a BASIC program in either U2 flavor attempts a write to a file that cannot be written to the program bombs completely out to TCL and no information is given about the file, nor about the specifics (is it the owner, the group, the RWX permissions?). There are system commands in both flavors that can be used to query a file's write-ability before attempting the WRITE. Before I go try to find every write in the system and put that check into place, I'm wondering why can't the write itself do this? Ideally not bomb out of the program, but even if that is hard to correct, reporting the NAME OF THE FILE that couldn't be written to would save many hours of system scouring! Susan Joslyn --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE
You think you are so much smarter than the rest of us don't you? Go fix yourself a dang quesadilla! Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Bessel Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:13 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE Well, I would hope that you would know that, Mr. UniBasic Smarty-Pants Who Thinks He's So Smart And by the way it's "could EVEN know that", not "could EVER know that". Gosh! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:48 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE Like anyone could ever know that! Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Bessel Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 1:11 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE Use the write ON ERROR clause to display info about the error using STATUS, FILEINFO, etc. Any time that I've ever encountered an abort in a BASIC program due to a write error, it's given me the source code line #. I can then look at the source code to see what file was being written to and start my investigation there. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Joslyn Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:33 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE When a BASIC program in either U2 flavor attempts a write to a file that cannot be written to the program bombs completely out to TCL and no information is given about the file, nor about the specifics (is it the owner, the group, the RWX permissions?). There are system commands in both flavors that can be used to query a file's write-ability before attempting the WRITE. Before I go try to find every write in the system and put that check into place, I'm wondering why can't the write itself do this? Ideally not bomb out of the program, but even if that is hard to correct, reporting the NAME OF THE FILE that couldn't be written to would save many hours of system scouring! Susan Joslyn --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE
Like anyone could ever know that! Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karen Bessel Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 1:11 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE Use the write ON ERROR clause to display info about the error using STATUS, FILEINFO, etc. Any time that I've ever encountered an abort in a BASIC program due to a write error, it's given me the source code line #. I can then look at the source code to see what file was being written to and start my investigation there. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Joslyn Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:33 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE When a BASIC program in either U2 flavor attempts a write to a file that cannot be written to the program bombs completely out to TCL and no information is given about the file, nor about the specifics (is it the owner, the group, the RWX permissions?). There are system commands in both flavors that can be used to query a file's write-ability before attempting the WRITE. Before I go try to find every write in the system and put that check into place, I'm wondering why can't the write itself do this? Ideally not bomb out of the program, but even if that is hard to correct, reporting the NAME OF THE FILE that couldn't be written to would save many hours of system scouring! Susan Joslyn --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
{Blocked Content} RE: [U2] RE: [U2C] U2 / Cache
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed Warning: (not named). Warning: Please read the "AngelicHost-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information. You can actually access the data via C# quite easily. They provide utilities to create Proxy classes that work very nicely. This is definitley a forward thinking company. Cache also provides native web and web service support. CSP, or Cacher Server Pages ( I think ). Thanks, Nick Cipollina From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Baker Hughes Sent: Mon 4/16/2007 4:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] RE: [U2C] U2 / Cache If you don't want to use their own 'Zen' object stuff, can you use whatever you want? C#, VB, Java ? How does it like ODBC, ADO or other methods of getting to the Cache data? We've all had our days hemmed into a proprietary environment. I hope I'm wrong for the sake of my comrades like Dawn, but I haven't heard anything to make me think otherwise, but that your development efforts will be dependent on that 1 company, and tied to their survival. Just some questions: If it's so good then what vertical apps are porting to it? (from MV or RDMS spaces) Why are they going after the MV market so strongly ? After you've written your killer app, and the buyer wants a different db, what are your options? (can you do a [somewhat] simple data/dict conversion and take it to some *other* MV database? Have you seen any dollar figures on their R&D investment, compared to other 2NF db providers? -Baker -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn Wolthuis Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:36 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] U2 / Cache I should perhaps put this on the U2C list, but I'll second some of Tony's impressions of Cache'. I am starting a new venture (adventure) and have selected Cache', using their MV tools as well as their AJAX tools, for the platform. In my case, I have done a few talks here and there in the past couple of years, with my primary focus in two areas: MV and AJAX. It was shocking and delightful to see that there was a company spending a large amount of its R&D dollars on two primary projects during this time: MultiValue implementation and AJAX integration. So, I had to take a look. Their MUMPS technology (with objects added, just as they added object features to MultiValue BASIC) is renamed Cache' Object Script. It is at least as unimpressive at first glance to a non-MUMPS developer as Pick might be to a non-Pick developer. But they set up the MV implementation so that, in theory (I'm guessing there are exceptions), anywhere that you can write MUMPS code, you can now write DataBASIC (Cache' MultiValue BASIC). Very cool. Cache' classes can be developed, looking similar to Java and other object languages, that generate MultiValue dictionaries. These classes then work with the rest of their AJAX implementation (named Zen). Any Cache' class with methods in it can have those methods written in MultiValue BASIC. As a sometimes Java developer, it is pretty interesting to see this blend of OOP and MV. Feel free to ask me any questions about the product or my decision on this, if desired, especially as we get into more hands-on with the product this summer (the devil is in the details and all). Of course, there will always be a place in my heart for U2, but I had to make the best decision for the new software we will be building and InterSystems with their Cache' offering that now includes MultiValue just "feels" more like the future, with their 24-7 approach, scalability etc. There was really good energy at the conference and in discussions with key Intersystems folks. I like the U2 group too, but they do not have the same level of corporate-wide backing for their MV product that Cache' has, so the innovations are not in the same place either. Cheers! --dawn -- Dawn M. Wolthuis Tincat Group, Inc. tincat-group.com Take and give some delight today --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service -- The original e-mail attachment "winmail.dat" was believed to be infected by a virus and has been replaced by this warning message. If you wish to receive a copy of the *infected* attachment, please e-mail helpdesk and include the whole of this message in your request. Alternatively, you can call them, with the contents of this message to hand when you call. At Mon Apr 16 16:31:50 2007 the virus scanner said: Could not parse Outlook Rich Text attachment Note to Help Desk: Look on the AngelicHost MailScanner in /home/virtual/site2/fst/var/spoo
RE: Spam:RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net
Cache isn't exactly putting a new face on an old product. The inverse is probably the truth here. They are putting an old face (PICK Basic) on a new (sort of) product, Cache. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:47 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: Spam:RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net Jerry: It's really cool how good ideas spring from seemingly nowhere. :-) Bill -Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry >Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:45 AM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: Re: Spam:RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net > >Strange how you can just change the name or add a character to the name then >all of a sudden it makes it a whole new language. Just like this other >discussion on Cache. You put a new face on an old product and all of a >sudden it becomes the rage. Maybe IBM should consider doing the same with >one of the U2 products and start marketing it under the name DB-1D (Uni = 1, >Data) or DB-UV. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
{Blocked Content} RE: [U2] U2 / Cache
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed Warning: (not named). Warning: Please read the "AngelicHost-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information. We have received a complete price-list from them. The price is very similar to UV. I actually have it running some of our uv code on a VM. Works like a charm. Thanks, Nick From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of will Sent: Fri 4/13/2007 9:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] U2 / Cache The on-line demo of Cache looked good to me. What I didn't like the almost immediate sales call after the down load. The bloke who called demanded to know everything about my company and its products and everything I had done or ever might do in using their product and refused to give me a price. Do you have a price for a license? Does anyone have it actually performing? Thanks, Will Nick Cipollina wrote: We are evaluating Cache. I really like it. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of will Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] U2 / mv.net Has there been an evaluation of Cache on this list? Will Nick Cipollina wrote: We are using C#, and that is because we are a C# shop. At the moment we are not using mv.Net, although we have evaluated the product. It is a nice product. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Hammerle Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] U2 / mv.net Hello Nick, I think the main reason we are using VB ( vb.NET ) with mv.Net is that we have some people with a lot of VB experience but little to none C# experience. Which language are you using or planning to use? And are you using mv.NET? Thanks, George Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:40:02 -0400 From: "Nick Cipollina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net Hello, I'm curious, how many of you that are using .Net are using VB as opposed to C#? And why? Thanks, Nick Cipollina --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service -- The original e-mail attachment "winmail.dat" was believed to be infected by a virus and has been replaced by this warning message. If you wish to receive a copy of the *infected* attachment, please e-mail helpdesk and include the whole of this message in your request. Alternatively, you can call them, with the contents of this message to hand when you call. At Sat Apr 14 15:02:09 2007 the virus scanner said: Could not parse Outlook Rich Text attachment Note to Help Desk: Look on the AngelicHost MailScanner in /home/virtual/site2/fst/var/spool/mail.quarantine/20070414 (message l3EM27dN018216). -- Postmaster MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
{Blocked Content} RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed Warning: (not named). Warning: Please read the "AngelicHost-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information. I'm a C# guy myself. One of the things I like about it is that everything is strongly typed. Nothing against VB, but I would probably be one of those guys turning my nose down upon VB :) Thanks, Nick From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Brian Leach Sent: Sat 4/14/2007 6:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net Nick I use both - along with just about anything else I can get my hands on. To all intents and purposes there is NO difference between C# and VB.net. There was at earlier releases - whether deliberate marketing or not, at 1.0 and 1.1 some aspects of C# did perform better. That's no longer the case with 2.0 and a lot of total rubbish is talked about the different capabilities - usually by C# pros wishing to defend their geekiness and higher fees. But then, 'twas always thus with C++. In fact, that discussion is just another thing Microsoft have inherited from the Borland world when they appropriated Delphi for the design of .NET - all those Borland C++ guys (yes it was always guys) trying to pretend C++ was faster than Delphi. Wrong.. It's really just a matter of personal style and preference. I tend to use C# for my own projects and amusement and VB for onsite work - especially if the code will eventually be maintained and supported by someone else. It's just that little bit easier to read. I also prefer the VB syntax for purely IDE purposes - the intellisense works better when you type Dim MyVariable as New [and the drop down appears to give you the options ] as opposed to the C# [no context for the drop down to appear so you must remember the path yourself] System.bloody.long.namespace.path.to.this MyVariable = new [dropdown now finally appears for] System.bloody.long.namespace.path.to.this(); (As an aside, that's a bit of syntax I've always despised. Why not have a default constructor that doesn't need you to repeat the class name after new? How much time/typing would that save?) And the IDE makes a better job of linking event delegates in VB compared to C#. Passing var arguments is more clumsy in C# and annoying after VB. On the other hand, the syntax for generics fits more nicely with C#. Ya Pays Ya Money.. So essentially - if you want to show off use C#. If you want to produce code that people can follow, use VB.net. That's really the choice. At the library level they all work together. So you can always mix and match if you have a modular design. I've always done that with native Windows development - VB wrappers (for the look and feel) around Delphi components (to do the work) and occasional C++ libraries, drawing on the best skills of the developers I had at the time. People can get too hung up on the languages. What matters - always - is the design: you can produce crap in any language! I would learn both VB and C# anyway and widen your options - the real 'work' in learning .Net is about understanding the framework and design principles, and how Windows/GUI/Event oriented applications work anyway. After that, the syntax comes second. Brian > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen > Sent: 14 April 2007 10:34 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net > > I use VB.NET with uniobjects.net- in the end both c# and > vb.net create msil and there is in reality very little > difference. There is a lot of snobbery out there about c# and > vb.net that I would not advise anyone to get involved in ... > > > Rgds > Symeon. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick > Cipollina > Sent: 13 April 2007 13:40 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net > > Hello, > > I'm curious, how many of you that are using .Net are using VB > as opposed to C#? And why? > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > George Hammerle > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [U2] U2 / mv.net > > Hello, > > We are in the process of converting some Unibasic/SB+ > applications to VB apps using mv.Net. We are several months > into the project and have learned quite a bit. We have spent > a lot of time on design and have created documentation on > what should and should not be done. I was wondering if there > are any other users that would like to share their > experiences and learn from each other? We are also > implementing Report Services using mv.Net and t
RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net
We are evaluating Cache. I really like it. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of will Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] U2 / mv.net Has there been an evaluation of Cache on this list? Will Nick Cipollina wrote: > We are using C#, and that is because we are a C# shop. At the moment we > are not using mv.Net, although we have evaluated the product. It is a > nice product. > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Hammerle > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:30 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [U2] U2 / mv.net > > Hello Nick, > > I think the main reason we are using VB ( vb.NET ) with mv.Net > is that we have some people with a lot of VB experience but little to > none C# experience. Which language are you using or planning to use? And > are you using mv.NET? > > Thanks, George > > Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:40:02 -0400 > From: "Nick Cipollina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net > > Hello, > > I'm curious, how many of you that are using .Net are using VB as opposed > to C#? And why? > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina > --- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > --- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net
We are using C#, and that is because we are a C# shop. At the moment we are not using mv.Net, although we have evaluated the product. It is a nice product. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Hammerle Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] U2 / mv.net Hello Nick, I think the main reason we are using VB ( vb.NET ) with mv.Net is that we have some people with a lot of VB experience but little to none C# experience. Which language are you using or planning to use? And are you using mv.NET? Thanks, George Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:40:02 -0400 From: "Nick Cipollina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net Hello, I'm curious, how many of you that are using .Net are using VB as opposed to C#? And why? Thanks, Nick Cipollina --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] U2 / mv.net
Hello, I'm curious, how many of you that are using .Net are using VB as opposed to C#? And why? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Hammerle Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 7:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] U2 / mv.net Hello, We are in the process of converting some Unibasic/SB+ applications to VB apps using mv.Net. We are several months into the project and have learned quite a bit. We have spent a lot of time on design and have created documentation on what should and should not be done. I was wondering if there are any other users that would like to share their experiences and learn from each other? We are also implementing Report Services using mv.Net and these reports are quite impressive. We are a Unidata / SB+ / Unix shop currently using wIntergrate. Thank You, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] OT Employment: Will work for food or manye
Will, Where are you located, and would you be willing to relocate? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of will Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 12:42 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] OT Employment: Will work for food or manye THANKS! Both for your caring attitude and the ideas. I have my resume posted on some boards but didn't know there was one for MV... or do you mean on the U2 list? Kind regards, Will Charles Barouch wrote: > Will, > Willing to post your resume? If you want people to help, it might > help if they knew some of the details that make you worth promoting. > Also, as I just said in the Selling MV class I did at Spectrum: > "Sometimes you need to come in the door as the MS Office Trainer, the > Network Guru, etc." You may need to get in the door with secondary > skills and help a new shop convert to MV once they have faith in your > opinions. > >- Chuck > > will wrote: >> Looks like I am losing my last major contract and nothing new is >> developing in the MV world locally or telecommute. If you have any >> leads you could help keep another disenfranchised MV professional off >> the streets... :-) >> >> Take care, >> >> Will >> --- >> u2-users mailing list >> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] DBF file parser in UV Basic?
We have actually written a callable subroutine that will do just this. The only problem is, the dbf has to be a FoxPro 2.6 dbf. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Buss, Troy (Logitek Systems) Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 8:08 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] DBF file parser in UV Basic? I may need to parse out several DBF files for import and processing in Universe10.0 (Windows Server version). Does anyone already have a generic Universe Basic program they would care to share that will parse out the DBF file format particularly compatible with visual foxpro? Here is a specification: http://www.dbf2002.com/dbf-file-format.html http://www.dbase.com/knowledgebase/int/db7_file_fmt.htm Thanks! -Troy --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [OT][U2] Wintegrate
I want wIntegrate because of the tie-in to unidebugger, which can then be tied into PRC which we are going to be purchasing soon. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 1:13 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [OT][U2] Wintegrate Have you checked into Dynamic Connect? It is the default supplied with Unidata/Universe PE version. Vance Alspach "Mark Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/14/2006 12:03 PM Please respond to u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To cc Subject Re: [OT][U2] Wintegrate If you must get wintegrate, it should still be available from IBM. I would strongly go with Accuterm as it wins hands down on many comparisons. Unless your apps are married to wintegrate's gui components. Accuterm's GUI designer is huge. 2 of my clients have dictated that all new programs are done with it and it works perfectly side by side in a green screen environment. Best of all, Accuterm is $1,000 for 50 licenses versus $225 each from IBM. You do the math. My 1,000 cents Mark Johnson > Does anyone know where I can get a copy of Wintegrate? > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [OT][U2] Wintegrate
Yeah, I had found that already, but I need to know where I can get the license. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russ Watson Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:23 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [OT][U2] Wintegrate Try... http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/download/search.jsp?go=y&rs=u2trial s Russ Watson Asynchron Systems Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:48 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [OT][U2] Wintegrate Does anyone know where I can get a copy of Wintegrate? Thanks, Nick Cipollina MCTS, MCP ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804) 965-8294 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[OT][U2] Wintegrate
Does anyone know where I can get a copy of Wintegrate? Thanks, Nick Cipollina MCTS, MCP ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804) 965-8294 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Strange characters in XML output
Have you tried using XMLMAPPING? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Lin Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:08 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Strange characters in XML output [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hmmm, I haven't seen anything like this but the "L10" being appended > looks suspiciously like a bad conversion justification that might be > appending to the file name. I would check all the dictionaries involved > in this listing, including @id, @, @select, any 'PH's and any other dict > control items to make sure they aren't mal-formed. > > Stuart Stuart, I didn't find anything unusual in the dictionaries. Also the problem I described is inconsistent. For example. If I open a new telnet session to Universe and do simple Retrieve statement to output XML, the first attempt may give me the right result. However, if do a ".X" at TCL prompt to execute the same Retrieve statement, I will usually get extra characters in the XML output. This not a show stopper for me at this time since I can produce good XML output without any problem by using SQL SELECT instead of Retrieve. Jason --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET Help
Paul, Thank you very much. Turns out we were missing the VOCLIB file. This is a very useful piece of information. Is this documented anywhere? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hamrick Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:30 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET Help Found in IBM U2 Knowledge Base - Check for the existence of the following files in the account: VOC D_VOC VOCLIB D_VOCLIB &SAVEDLISTS& D_&SAVEDLISTS& These six files must be physically present in the account, VOC pointers to a remote file won't work. Most often it is the VOCLIB or D_VOCLIB that are missing. These can be recreated at the tcl level or simply copied into the account. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:55 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2][UV] UO.NET Help Hello All, I am having an issue with connecting to a universe account. I am getting the following exception: [IBM U2][UODOTNET - UNICLIENT][ErrorCode=39125] The directory does not exist, or is not a UniVerse account What I don't get is the account does exist on the server. In fact, this fails regardless of which account I attempt to connect to. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Nick Cipollina MCTS, MCP ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)965-8294 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] UO.NET Help
Hello All, I am having an issue with connecting to a universe account. I am getting the following exception: [IBM U2][UODOTNET - UNICLIENT][ErrorCode=39125] The directory does not exist, or is not a UniVerse account What I don't get is the account does exist on the server. In fact, this fails regardless of which account I attempt to connect to. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Nick Cipollina MCTS, MCP ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)965-8294 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] What Good Are Associations?
I've used them before. They are quite handy when displaying related multi-value fields. They are also required if you are using XML mapping with TOXML to put related attributes in the same nodes. Otherwise, it generates ugly xml. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Brutzman, Bill Sent: Fri 10/6/2006 1:48 PM To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org' Subject: [U2] What Good Are Associations? In a D-Descriptor... aside from a reference-info column in a data-dictionary display to show fields that are correlated (like Ship.Date and Ship.Qty), does anybody [or does U2] use dictionary field seven? --Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] Version question
How can I tell which version of universe is installed on the server? I know this has been asked before, but I cannot find the email. Thanks, Nick Cipollina MCTS, MCP ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)965-8294 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Cache
Cool. Now about this uvbackup. I've never used it. How can I use it? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:35 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] Cache Cache has a utility MVIMPORT that will load a uvbackup. So use universe to back up an account, and then import it into cache. If you are running cache on windows, it asks if you want to view the "getting started" page at the end of the install, and there's information there about more you can do. Also there's some multivalue documentation in the system documentation link that you get by right-clicking the cache cube. There's a google group CacheMV http://groups.google.com/group/CacheMV for the cache MV developer community. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick > Cipollina > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:42 PM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2][UV] Cache > > > Hello, > > Has anyone on the list ever looked at Cache from > InterSystems? We are currently evaluating it, and I'm trying > to figure out how to pull some of our Universe stuff into > Cache. Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina > > MCTS, MCP > ACS Heritage, Inc. > 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 > Richmond, VA 23294 > (804)965-8294 > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] Cache
Hello, Has anyone on the list ever looked at Cache from InterSystems? We are currently evaluating it, and I'm trying to figure out how to pull some of our Universe stuff into Cache. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Nick Cipollina MCTS, MCP ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)965-8294 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Help! Uniobjects for .NET Users
C# or VB? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patricia Wilson Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 10:38 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Help! Uniobjects for .NET Users Ok - here's the deal fellow board members. My boss is trying out Uniobjects for .NET for an app and has some simple Questions for the experienced user of which he has asked me (who he knowingly doesn't use that technology), and asked me to Post them. However, I think it would be much easier if I could just have someone spend 10 minutes answering his questions on The phone then me interpreting what he says and posting it... Any takers here? I am desperate!!! Patricia M. Wilson MIS Programmer x 3095 813.635.3095 [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV][AD] Universe programmer position available
My company is currently looking for a universe programmer. Below are the requirements of said individual. If you are interested, you can email your resume to me directly. This position is in Richmond, VA in the US. Technical Skills: * One or more years experience with Universe (enough to thoroughly know how to code and/or read/modify existing programs) * Experience using FoxPro or Access tools for data analysis and/or manipulation * Experience working with very large data files (multi-gb, distributed files) * Experience with SQLServer or SQL stored procedures would be nice, but not required * BizTalk or similar technology a plus, but not mandatory. * Preference for someone with experience with large data conversions and ETL tools Professional Skills: * Can work independently without direct supervision * Proven ability to multitask * Demonstrated ability and willingness to learn new technology * Lots of patience (they will be working with other Universe programmers ;-) ) * Willing to be on-call * No Travel, must be in Richmond * Good basic team and communication skills Thanks, Nick Cipollina --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UD: Synonym account
I don't know how it works in Unidata, but in Universe, you add a record to the VOC called DEMO, and in that record you put IAM DEMO. If you want the account to be MyDemo, you add a record to the VOC called MyDemo and put in IAM MyDemo. These records would be paragraphs. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:48 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] UD: Synonym account How does one go about creating a synonym account. For instance, I have an account E:\MyDirectory\Demo If I log into this directory, which I must do, the @WHO tells me I'm logged into "DEMO". Makes sense. The path in the (UD.ACCOUNT) file is "E:\IBM\ud71\Demo". So, if I want to log into both accounts and want @WHO to reflect "MyDemo" in "E:\MyDirectory\Demo" and "Demo" in the UniData demo account how do I do it? I can't create a "MyDemo" item in (UD.ACCOUNT) because I can't log into "MyDemo". Thanks. Bill Haskett --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Changing server IP address
We have actually done exactly what you have stated. It seemed to work just fine. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 9:13 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Changing server IP address We are currently upgrading to a new solaris server. The plan was to go live with the new server this week. In order to minimise disruption, we had planned to modify the IP address and hostname of the new server to match the current production server (as well as changing the IP address and hostname of the current production server to avoid a clash). This would have meant that no client terminal emulator settings would need changing. Will this be possible or will the UniVerse software complain because it thinks it has been copied to a different server? Are we better off configuring the client PCs? Regards, Rob Wills (rob dot wills at tigerinfotech dot com) --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] OLEDB connection string
Very helpful. Thanks a lot Bill! Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 6:04 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] OLEDB connection string Nick: I created a new datasource as follows: Shared Data Source: Name--: UDOleDBReports Type--: OLE DB Connection string: Provider=IBM.UniOLEDB.1;Data Source=asidevud Connection Properties (via the [Edit] button in above dialog): Data Source: OLE DB (OLE DB) OLE DB Provider: UniOLEDB Provider Enter a server or file name: Server of file name: asidevud (in the uci.config item) Location---: leave blank (this messed me up for awhile) Log on to the server: Use a specific user name and password User name: valid Windows/UniData user (also in UniAdmin > Network Service > UDTelnet Server > Users) Password-: valid Windows password for above user Allow saving password The connection string looks like: Provider=IBM.UniOLEDB.1;Data Source=asidevud;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=DataTrustNET I used the UCI Configurator to create the OleDB section. Although the tool seems to indicate this is only an ODBC tool the OleDB documentation, without mentioning it, assumed ODBC and OleDB sections are exactly the same. Hope this helps. :-) Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 12:04 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] OLEDB connection string In the connection string, what is the Data Source? Is that the server that Universe resides on? What is the Location? Is that the account name? Is it the path to the account? No matter what values I put in these fields, I cannot get it to connect. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 3:26 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] OLEDB connection string Nick: When I access UniOleDB from SQL Reporting Services my connection looks like: Provider=IBM.UniOLEDB.1;Data Source=asidevud And my uci.config item, on my client machine, looks like: DBMSTYPE = UNIDATA NETWORK = TCP/IP SERVICE = udserver HOST = MyDevServer ACCOUNT = E:\MyApps\Demo USERNAME = MyUserNET Maybe this helps. :-) Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 1:12 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] OLEDB connection string Can anyone provide me with a sample unioledb connection string that I could use in my .NET code? Thanks, Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)965-8294 --- --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] OLEDB connection string
In the connection string, what is the Data Source? Is that the server that Universe resides on? What is the Location? Is that the account name? Is it the path to the account? No matter what values I put in these fields, I cannot get it to connect. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 3:26 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] OLEDB connection string Nick: When I access UniOleDB from SQL Reporting Services my connection looks like: Provider=IBM.UniOLEDB.1;Data Source=asidevud And my uci.config item, on my client machine, looks like: DBMSTYPE = UNIDATA NETWORK = TCP/IP SERVICE = udserver HOST = MyDevServer ACCOUNT = E:\MyApps\Demo USERNAME = MyUserNET Maybe this helps. :-) Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 1:12 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] OLEDB connection string Can anyone provide me with a sample unioledb connection string that I could use in my .NET code? Thanks, Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)965-8294 --- --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] OLEDB connection string
Can anyone provide me with a sample unioledb connection string that I could use in my .NET code? Thanks, Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)965-8294 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] .net - universe 10.1.14
We are actually using Biztalk here. I'm not sure what your purpose with using Universe and .Net, but we are using Biztalk to transform datafiles we receive from various clients into a known format for processing in Universe. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 5:51 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] .net - universe 10.1.14 Hi Bob - my experience with Redback tels me that i would look very carefully at what i wanted to do if i was to go down that path again. If you are wanting to do some .net development then uniobjects.net gives you a a heap of classes you can use in your app. Or mv.net gets some pretty good write ups both here and in cdp. Personally that is the route i would take. rgds Symeon. www.a2c-ltd.com www.sjb-solutions.net On 20/06/06, Bob Witney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Apologies I asked this before then went on tour for 3 weeks and my > wonderfull staff cleared by emails > > So > > I am looking to tie Universe 10.1.14 to a .net development > > I am looking at biztalk and redback and one other piece of software to > facilitate this > > Any experiences/opinions will be gratefully received (and read this time) > > > Bob Witney > IT Senior > EXPLORE! > Nelson House > 55 Victoria Road > Farnborough > Hampshire > GU14 7PA, UK > Tel: 01252 379489 > Mob: 07973 451156 > www.explore.co.uk > > > > > __ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > __ > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] MQSeries and UniVerse
Has anyone out there used MQSeries with UniVerse? If so, how was it used? Is there any UniVerse MQSeries integration available? Thanks, Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)965-8294 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] OK...Is there a way....UV
What about SSELECT FILE FIRST 2? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:03 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] OK...Is there a wayUV ED DICT FILE REC.COUNT 001 I 002 @RECCOUNT 003 004 Cnt 005 5R 006 S SORT FILE WITH REC.COUNT < "2" N'es pas? __ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of "George Gallen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, 26 May 2006 05:16 To: Subject: [U2] OK...Is there a wayUV I want to sort a file by @ID and only take the first two items... SELECT FILE BY @ID SAMPLE 2 doesn't work, it first takes the sample of 2, then sorts it. SELECT FILE BY @ID SELECT FILE SAMPLE 2 works, but takes two lines How can I phrase my SELECT so it will sort first, then sample later, instead of sample first, sort later? I'm running UV. George George Gallen Senior Programmer/Analyst Accounting/Data Division [EMAIL PROTECTED] ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220 SLACK Incorporated - Delivering the best in health care information and education worldwide. http://www.slackinc.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (+61 3 9269 7555) immediately, who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer related viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Solaris Compatiblity?
Solaris is all we use here. We have quite a few servers running Solaris and Universe. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 1:06 PM To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org' Subject: [U2] [UV] Solaris Compatiblity? I am considering Sun's Solaris to run a hot-spare-backup-x86 server. Our main box is HP-Ux. Does UniVerse run on Solaris? I have not yet asked IBM about licensing issues. --Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Forum General Question
Haven't you seen any of the about 3000 emails on this subject? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 9:21 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Forum General Question So why was it changed in the first place. I wonder how many liked it that way. Mark Johnson - Original Message - From: "Richard Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 11:45 PM Subject: Re: [U2] Forum General Question > I think what Larry is saying is that it is now back to the first scenario > you described. When you hit reply, the message goes to the list, which is > then distributed to all of us. I subscribe to different list. Some I have > to know to hit 'reply to all' to get my message to everyone. Some I can > just hit reply and it goes to the list & the poster. The poster will get it > twice, once from me, once from the list. Personally I don't care which way > it is setup. If I reply wrong for the list, that is my bad. > > Richard > > - Original Message - > From: "Mark Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 11:20 PM > Subject: [U2] Forum General Question > > > > While I'm a MV person, I don't know everything about all of this > > email/web/forum/thread stuff. > > > > What was the kind of U2 forum whereby a person posted a request and > everyone > > got it. Then each answer got sprayed to everyone. And so on until it died. > > > > Now, it appears that only the person issuing the question gets the reply > and > > many of us who might learn something of their public discussion are out of > the > > loop. > > > > Am I detecting this properly. > > > > Thanks > > Mark Johnson > > --- > > u2-users mailing list > > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Newest UV UniDebugger
I'm referring to when I set a breakpoint on a variable. I've also noticed that if you have a breakpoint set on a line, and you hit a subroutine before the breakpoint. It will blow right by that too. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: leslie chamberlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 2:59 PM To: Nick Cipollina; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Newest UV UniDebugger I have the same issue. I am a newbie, so I assumed I did not know how to use it properly. I find this especially true when the breakpoint or request to stop when a variable changes is in a called subroutine. I believe I did have the called subroutine as active, but it would not stop at all when the variable changed. I have read the available help and could not get past that. It also does not know the program is complete. It simply goes into some black hole. The whole situation made me uneasy and I could not find any help, so I use RAID which is what others here use. I would much prefer to use Unidebugger. I would love an online class session on this. Thanks, Leslie Chamberlin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Newest UV UniDebugger Does anyone else have trouble with the debugger? I'll set a break point in a program, and the debugger will blow right by it sometimes. It can be very frustrating. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 12:37 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Newest UV UniDebugger That's easy. In the view menu select "3" for Host. You can also close the other windows (session is the host screen). Finally, just drag the window edges (of the session window) to make it larger Hth Colin Alfke Calgary Canada P.S. I hope this isn't one of the really easy ones that gets 40 responses after I send this >-Original Message- >From: Bob Little > >I've only recently tried using the UniDebugger. > >The terminal display window is so tiny, I can't read any >messages it outputs. It'd be nice to be able to change the >font size for that window. If that's an option right now, I >sure couldn't find it. > >Bob Little --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Newest UV UniDebugger
Does anyone else have trouble with the debugger? I'll set a break point in a program, and the debugger will blow right by it sometimes. It can be very frustrating. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 12:37 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Newest UV UniDebugger That's easy. In the view menu select "3" for Host. You can also close the other windows (session is the host screen). Finally, just drag the window edges (of the session window) to make it larger Hth Colin Alfke Calgary Canada P.S. I hope this isn't one of the really easy ones that gets 40 responses after I send this >-Original Message- >From: Bob Little > >I've only recently tried using the UniDebugger. > >The terminal display window is so tiny, I can't read any >messages it outputs. It'd be nice to be able to change the >font size for that window. If that's an option right now, I >sure couldn't find it. > >Bob Little --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Newest UV UniDebugger
I'd settle for the debugger working all the time. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 9:50 PM To: Bob Woodward; U2-Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Newest UV UniDebugger Hear, hear! When you do Ctl-F to find a word you have highlighted, it no longer defaults to look for that word. You now have to highlight, Ctl-C, Ctl-F, Ctl-V to do the same thing. Same for Ctl-H to replace. Change in behaviour of HOME key is driving one of our people mad, too. Only enhancement we can see is list of labels from Edit menu (or Ctl-F12). No use to us, as we use numeric labels in small programs. What we would like to se is many, many more programs shown in the Windows list, with the ability to sort them. Cheers, Kate - Original Message - From: "Bob Woodward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U2-Users List" Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:15 AM Subject: RE: [U2] Newest UV UniDebugger > As a follow-up to this posting, I'd recommend to everyone NOT to install > the version 10.1b client utilities. Stick with the 10.1a. The README > says that it's primarily an update to IBM standards in appearance. It's > a BIG mistake as far as I'm concerned. The biggest problem is that when > a session is minimized, the UniDebugger AND Dynamic Connect look > identical and I've not been able to find a way to change it. Also, if > you try to have the two versions co-exist, they don't. Then there's the > problem of two different formats for the UniDebugger workspace files > with no way to convert. > > Bottom line is you gain nothing in features or bug fixes, and the IBM > standard appearance Well, let's just say I'm glad the car companies > don't do the same thing. You wouldn't be able to tell the difference > between trucks, cars, vans, or SUV's. > > BobW > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Woodward > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:55 AM > To: U2-Users List > Subject: [U2] Newest UV UniDebugger > > Hi Folks, > > I've just downloaded and installed the newest utilities for Universe, > v101b-clients-7149, from the IBM site. They seem to have made a number > of changes and it seems like one is the format of the workspace file in > the UniDebugger program. Does anyone know if there is a converter > between the v101a version to the v101b version? I've got a number of > different work spaces with a number of different programs I keep in them > and it's going to be ROYAL pain in the butt to have to re-open all of > them. > > I'm not too wild about the change in the icon's, either, since the > Dynamic Connect icon and the UniDebugger icon are the same in the task > bar. There's not an easy way to change it, either, without hacking a > file association entry. > > Thanks, > > BobW > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations
I agree with Tony. I have never been subscribed to a list where I had to reply to all, just to reply to a thread. Please put it back the way it was. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 5:51 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to mail list configurations This is breaking all kinds of things including filters, remailers, and maybe threading for some reader programs. It's going to create confusion when people mail to one another off-list. And for anyone who isn't familiar with this completely unique solution people are going to think they're responding to a list when they're responding to some person - and we might start seeing ongoing inquiries about "hey, where did my response go?" (I'm resending this post precisely because the original was mailed incorrectly due to the change.) Sorry folks but I don't believe this is a good long-term solution. I think we should go back to the way it was until a more standard solution can be found. Tony > Larry Hiscock wrote: >> We have made some changes to the mailing list configuration files in >> an attempt to reduce some of the problems we have been experiencing >> these past few days. > ... >> What does this mean to you? It means this: >> >> * If you click 'reply' to respond to a list message, your response >> will go ONLY to the original sender of the message. >> >> * If you click 'reply to ALL', your reply will go to BOTH the >> original sender AND back to the list. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Steve Cashman
Does anyone know when Steve Cashman will be back in the office? Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)965-8294 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] Using Veritas Cluster Server with Unidata
We are using Veritas with Universe. I know very little about it though, as I am just a developer. I do know it seems to be working quite well though. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 7:47 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UD] Using Veritas Cluster Server with Unidata I heard of these guys using it - thats all tho im afraid http://www.hds.com/pdf/cs_naca.pdf On 2/23/06, Andy Pflueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > We have a project in the works up the corporate chain which involves > setting up our Unidata/Oracle production system in a Veritas Cluster > Server environment for full fault tolerance and high availability. > This also includes a much needed hardware upgrade of our existing prod > box. My goal here is to collect more info on how Veritas Cluster > Server is to be setup and used with Unidata. > > I'm being told by our Unix (Solaris SPARC 8/9) administrator that > they've purchased the Veritas Cluster Server agent for Unidata. Is > this a cake walk to setup and configure? Does anybody out there have > any general docs which they might send to me offline? > > TIA, > Andy Pflueger > Ivy Hill Corporation > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > The Linux philosophy is 'Laugh in the face of danger'. > Oops. Wrong One. 'Do it yourself'. Yes, that's it. > Linus Torvalds > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Creating a new record from UniObjects
Kind of like executing a sql server stored proc. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendy Smoak Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 6:05 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Creating a new record from UniObjects On 2/22/06, Jeff Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll look at how to implement using this. Because I'm new to UniData > I've really only done a uni.command and parsed the response. That was > fast but not very robust. > > I am planning to take a class in Denver next month but I think you may > have given me a jump start. I didn't mean to suggest that you should use the DAO pattern, just that there are some examples of reading and writing scattered throughout the page that might help. :) I never finished that example, it doesn't even show how to deal with multivalued and mv-associated fields. :/ You'll probably also want to learn how to call subroutines from UOJ. IMO, that's the single most useful method for getting data out. One call, do whatever you need to do in UniBasic code on the database side, and return whatever data the Java code needs. -- Wendy --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Soap Message To WebService
Try converting the "<" to "<" and the ">" to ">" etc... Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phil walker Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 10:17 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Soap Message To WebService Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? I have a programs which uses the SOAP Api functions to send data across to a Web Service on Windows written in VB.NET. The Webmethod takes six parameters, two of which, AuditXMLDoc, and DatabaseXMLDoc, are defined as strings in the VB code. I want to be able to pass in these strings, some 'XML', e.g. AuditData = 'TestData' and ConsumerData = '123' ...simplied for simplicity. If the SOAP message is sent across with normal non-XML strings then the Webservice works as expected, but as soon as I set the values of these parameters to an XML string then it breaks. I suspect that the XML within XML is confusing something somewhere. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Below is the soap message that is being sent with placeholders for the two strings. http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope";> http://apollo/Exodusvb";> 1140132735722 UPDATE 2006-02-17T12:32:15 AuditData ConsumerData usp_ExodusConsumerMaintenance --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Universe and SQL Server
Thanks for all of the suggestions. I was a little off in what it is that we want to do with this, but all of your suggestions were very helpful. What they really wanted was a way to compare data in SQL Server and UV. So we are probably going to write a .NET app that sits in the middle and pulls the data from both sides into datasets and compares them for differences. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Tod Sigafoos Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:14 AM To: Nick Cipollina Subject: Re: [U2][UV] Universe and SQL Server Nick, Thursday, February 2, 2006, 1:41:23 PM, you wrote: NC> Hello all, NC> We are currently looking into ways to share our data between NC> universe and SQL Server, and I am trying to get some suggestions NC> on the best way to do this. We are currently generating text NC> files in UV and ftp'ing those files to a designated location. We NC> have a task scheduler that picks up the files when they arrive and NC> inserts them into SQL server. I know there are ways to NC> communicate directly between SQL server and Universe and I am NC> looking for the best way to do this. It doesn't matter if NC> Universe reaches out to SQL Server or vice versa. Thanks. I think you will find the BCI client of Universe to be very good at the communication to SqlServer. Last year I worked with a client who needed the same type of communication. We developed a couple of routines they could use to 'read/write' SqlServer with minimal interference with the Universe developers. It turned out faily well .. quick and error free. There really is no need to go to any 'external middleware' answer when all the tools are right there. It lowers maintenance as your developers don't need to learn anything new (although that IS always fun). Give it a try .. ask questions here. -- DSig ` David Tod Sigafoos ( O O ) ___oOOo__( )__oOOo___ 'Politics is like driving. To go backward, put it in R. To go forward, put it in D' unknown --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] Universe and SQL Server
Hello all, We are currently looking into ways to share our data between universe and SQL Server, and I am trying to get some suggestions on the best way to do this. We are currently generating text files in UV and ftp'ing those files to a designated location. We have a task scheduler that picks up the files when they arrive and inserts them into SQL server. I know there are ways to communicate directly between SQL server and Universe and I am looking for the best way to do this. It doesn't matter if Universe reaches out to SQL Server or vice versa. Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Newbies need love too
Check out http://www.discoverycomputersystems.com/ I got my Universe training at Marcie's school. She now only does onsite training, but she is definitely one of the best instructors I have ever had. She has a lot of experience, and was one of the trainers at PICK. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walter Vaughan Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:34 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Newbies need love too We are looking extremely hard at moving our company to an MRP/DM vertical solution written to run on the UniVerse platform. Our internal staff has dozens of years experience with filePro, mySQL, PHP, perl... yet we have no experience among the four of us working with UniVerse or any MultiValued/Pick DBMS. The whole concept doesn't scare us since it appears to be a mashing together of a lot of concepts that we already are familiar with. HOWEVER. What about the newbies? Don't we get any love? I have went through every google term I could think of to come up with a simple "This is how you get started with a UniVerse". I have installed the personal editions and have the server running, but I have no clue as to really creating a database, defining a table, inserting data into a record, retrieving data from a record, and applying business logic to fields. Is there not a "UniVerse for Dummies" website? Our sales rep asked his programmer and he said, "I learned it 20 years ago, I don't know how you would learn it today." I have 23 and 28 year old programers that will have to live with this solution for the next 20 years. They're bright, but in order to get them excited about this platform I need to let them experiment. Any website pointers will be appreciated. Thanks, Walter Vaughan Vice President Steele Rubber Products, Inc. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] UO.NET connection
We have recently swapped out one of our Universe servers that we were accessing
via UO.NET. Connections to the server are now failing. The rpc daemon is
running but when I try to connect I am getting the following exception:
{"No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it"}
Any ideas what could be causing this? Thanks.
Nick Cipollina
Pick Programmer
ACS Heritage, Inc.
2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210
Richmond, VA 23294
(804)644-8707 x 314
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Shell Dispatch Quoting
You should be able to say SH -c ' mpack -s "this is the subject" -d body.file attachement.pdf emailname' Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:16 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Shell Dispatch Quoting I'm attempting to make use of a program called "mpack" which requires some command line arguments to be quoted. While doing this, I'm getting some over quoting and things are not worked as they should. Is there another character or technique (aside from writing the command out as a script and executing it that way) which can be used to get around this? Here's and example of the command I would like to use. mpack -s "this is the subject" -d body.file attachement.pdf emailname To execute this I have to wrap it in quotes like this. SH -c "mpack -s "this is the subject" -d body.file attachement.pdf emailname" This of course makes a mess... Any ideas? Or am I just being goofy today? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Plant hopping help
One thing to note with rlogin. If the user number is not the same on each server, even though the user-id and password are the same, it will prompt for password. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Gallen Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 12:03 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Plant hopping help if each "plant" is on a different machine, and all machines are running unix, you could use the rlogin command. WARNING: rlogin has some very serious security risks however. rlogin is the equivilent of a telnet without the username/password authentication. There is an assumed trust between machines and usernames. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith > W. Roberts > Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 11:23 AM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: RE: [U2] Plant hopping help > > > You'll have to define this a bit more. Assuming you mean > that each "plant" > is a different account ... a simple EXECUTE 'LOGTO > ':ACCT.NAME will do it. > > -Keith > > Original Message > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jason K. Szemborski > Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 7:30 AM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2] Plant hopping help > > > Hi all, > > > > I've been working on something that have run into a road > > block and know > > it can be done, but I can't figure it out. We have a > > multi-plant system > > and I need to take a user from one plant to another based on > > some search > > criteria. I have the search routine written out and have a place to > > call a subroutine to move someone from one plant to another > > but have yet > > to find anything that can log the user to another plant without them > > actually typing it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Environment: Universe - Pick > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jason Szemborski > > --- > > u2-users mailing list > > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] UODOTNET Connection Error
Just a thought. Has the port the rpc daemon runs on changed?
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Smith
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 9:30 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UODOTNET Connection Error
I have an XP client connecting to a 2003 Server running Unidata 7.1. The
following was working about
Aa month ago, in fact I have never had any problem connecting to the
server. This program (IBM's example program) worked in the past now I am
getting the following error trying to connect to the Demo account..
[IBM U2][UODOTNET - UNICLIENT][ErrorCode=39129] The account name
supplied is not a valid account
It blows up on the
// get session object
uniSession = UniObjects.OpenSession(_u2Server, _u2User, _u2Password,
_u2Account, "udcs");
I can still telnet to the server . The UniAdmin java program works
also.
Anyone tell me what to do.
Thanks in advance.
grs
Code info below:
_u2Server = ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings.Get("u2Server");
_u2User = ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings.Get("u2User");
_u2Password = ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings.Get("u2Password");
_u2Account = ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings.Get("u2Account");
>From Main
UniSession uniSession = null;
try
{
// get session object
uniSession = UniObjects.OpenSession(_u2Server, _u2User, _u2Password,
_u2Account, "udcs");
}
catch(Exception e)
{
if(uniSession != null && uniSession.IsActive)
... {
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] UniQuery virtual field question
One thing you might want to do is use
RAISE(TRANS('filename',field,field,'X')) The reason for this is that
when you use a file translate in an I-Descriptor, it drops fields to
multi-values, multi-value to sub-values etc...
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kathy Tymoczko
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 11:42 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UD] UniQuery virtual field question
I'm trying to make an i-descriptor that does the following: From a
multi-valued field, TRANS to another multi-valued field in a second
file,
and return just the first subvalue of that field for each record pointed
to
by the second field.
In the FILE1, I have a multi-valued field that is a list of pointers to
the
FILE2. And in that file is a multi-valued list of IDs. I only want the
first one of those. So that instead of a list that looks like:
FILE1 IDFILE2 IDS IDS
1234557 12345 0123456
0748923
13467 0003456
13578 0034569
0143434
I would have a list that looks like:
FILE1 IDFILE2 IDS IDS
1234557 12345 0123456
13467 0003456
13578 0034569
I've read the entire chaper on virtual fields in the "Using Unidata"
manual, but nothing I've tried (FIELD, SUBR('-FIELDS'), EXTRACT among
other
things) has worked.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Kathy Tymoczko
Information Technology Services
Wabash College, Crawfordsville, Indiana 47933
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 765-361-6440
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Date conversion question
Thanks, that is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 9:50 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] Date conversion question Nick D-YMD[4,2,2] Brian > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick > Cipollina > Sent: 12 October 2005 13:30 > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2][UV] Date conversion question > > If I want to convert a date to the following format: > CCYY-MM-DD with leading 0's, how can I do it. DYMD- will put > it in this format, but without the leading zero's. In other > words, if the date is January 10th, I want it to display as > follows: 2005-01-10 and DYMD- will display as 2005-1-10. > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina > > Pick Programmer > ACS Heritage, Inc. > 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 > Richmond, VA 23294 > (804)644-8707 x 314 > > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] Date conversion question
If I want to convert a date to the following format: CCYY-MM-DD with leading 0's, how can I do it. DYMD- will put it in this format, but without the leading zero's. In other words, if the date is January 10th, I want it to display as follows: 2005-01-10 and DYMD- will display as 2005-1-10. Thanks, Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS Heritage, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] U2 XML/DB Tool
What is this XML/DB Tool you are speaking of? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bjvrn Eklund Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 2:34 AM To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org' Subject: SV: [U2] U2 XML/DB Tool Hi, I've been able to connect as root. But all my accounts aren't visible in the tree view and when I try to go to a visible account I get an error message saying that the account path does not exist or you do not have enough priviliges to access the account path(even if I'm root). Rudy, run try updatevoc if you haven't done that already. You could also try adding a record in $UDTHOME/sys, UD.ACCOUNT pointing to the accounts you want. As you see I'm on Unidata and Solaris but it might be the same procedure in Universe. Perhaps some IBM representatives could help us out in this matter. Bjvrn Eklund Anknytning: 2088 -Ursprungligt meddelande- Fren: Cooper, Rudy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 12 oktober 2005 01:15 Till: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Dmne: [U2] U2 XML/DB Tool Has anyone had any luck in getting the U2 Client tool XMLDBTool to work (Connect) ? I'm trying to connect to a UV server on a W2K platform. I'm using the default settings for transport type and rpc port #. It seems to hang so I haven't been able to connect to my server. Anything I'm missing in trying to connect ? Thx, Rudy Rudy Cooper Information Technology Project Technical Lead Sage Publications 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320 Direct (805) 410-7724 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Universe and .NET
The reason that our current processes are so fast is that we read as much common data as humanly possible into memory at start-up so there is little overhead while the process is running. If I have to call a subroutine from .NET, that would actually slow processing down. I need to get the data into .NET's memory to do something similar. What about some of the other .NET options, such as MV.NET? Any thoughts on those? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gerry-u2ug Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 9:23 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] Universe and .NET my guess is that if you are running into performance issues using uo.net then you are trying to do everything via uo.net. you should be using uo.net to invoke universe routines to do most if not ALL of your processing. this way the performance should be virtually identical to native ( as it is in fact native ) the only overhead is the actuall call itself. Gerry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 08:24 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2][UV] Universe and .NET Hello all, I need some advice on Universe and .NET. We would like to begin using .NET as our front-end with Universe as our back-end. We have started to explore UO.NET, but it does not seem to provide us with the performance we will require. Our processes are currently written in PICK BASIC and we are processing transactions in sub-50 milliseconds. Does anyone have a suggestion for a .NET solution that might provide us with similar performance? I've seen some talk on this list of some of the other solutions such as MV.NET, but I don't recall seeing any metrics provided with any of these discussions. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] Universe and .NET
Hello all, I need some advice on Universe and .NET. We would like to begin using .NET as our front-end with Universe as our back-end. We have started to explore UO.NET, but it does not seem to provide us with the performance we will require. Our processes are currently written in PICK BASIC and we are processing transactions in sub-50 milliseconds. Does anyone have a suggestion for a .NET solution that might provide us with similar performance? I've seen some talk on this list of some of the other solutions such as MV.NET, but I don't recall seeing any metrics provided with any of these discussions. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV]Error Handling
Is there a way to capture the specifics of the error using ON.ABORT? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stevenson, Charles Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 5:02 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV]Error Handling > Is there a way to override error handling in Universe to do > something other than display a message and halt program > execution? What I would like is to have Universe send some > sort of notification when an error occurs. Not exactly, but here are a few ideas: 1. Errors (fatal & not) are recorded in $UVHOME/errlog. It's size is limited but configurable by uvconfig's MAXERRLOGENT. I have a phantom that continually polls this text file and populates my own structured hashed file & generate reports emailed to me and others. 2. There is ON.ABORT paragraph available to you to handle fatal errors. I trap them and populate another file & send emails. 3. On case by case basis, WRITE & other basic statements likely to be implicated in errors allow for ON ERROR clauses. Search for ON ERROR in the documentation pdf. I have a utility purpose subroutine that I stick in places like these ON ERROR clauses. The subroutine allows a text argument to be sent from the calling program & it also captures SYSTEM(9001) call stack info, then writes all that to a file, which is monitored. So far I haven't implemented an email from the subroutine, but probably should. cds --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV]Error Handling
Is there a way to override error handling in Universe to do something other than display a message and halt program execution? What I would like is to have Universe send some sort of notification when an error occurs. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] How to release locks (LIST.READU)
You can go to the UV account and do an UNLOCK.
UNLOCK
Use UNLOCK to clear file, group, and update record locks. You must be a
UniVerse Administrator logged in to the UV account to execute UNLOCK.
Syntax
UNLOCK [NODE node] [USER user.number]
[FILE pathname | [DEVICE device.number] [INODE i.node.number]]
[GROUP group.address] [RECORD record.ID]
{FILELOCK | GROUPLOCK | READULOCK | READLLOCK | ALL}
Parameters
The following table describes each parameter of the syntax.
Parameter Description
NODE node Restricts lock removal to the specified node.
UNIX. This must be the network node number, which is
the last part of the TCP/IP host number specified in the
/etc/hosts file.
Windows NT. If valid for Windows NT, the path of the
hosts file is /Windows/System32/Drivers/etc/hosts where
Windows is the Windows NT installation directory. On
Windows NT systems, you can also use the LAN Manager
node name.
USER user.number Restricts lock removal to locks owned by the specified
user. You can get the user number from the output of
LIST.READU.
FILE pathname Restricts lock removal to a file or device specified by
the
pathname. You cannot specify DEVICE or INODE clauses
in an UNLOCK statement that uses the FILE clause.
DEVICE
device.number
Restricts lock removal to a file or a device specified by the
device number.
UNLOCK Parameters
1-604 UniVerse User Reference
/productinfo/alldoc/UNIVERSE10/userref/Ch1
1/8/02
Specify the lock type as one of the following:
Description
You can specify ID numbers (that is, the node number, device number, or
record ID) in either decimal or hexadecimal format. Precede the number
with
0x to specify it as hexadecimal.
INODE i.node.number Restricts lock removal to a file or a device
specified by the
i-node number.
GROUP group.address Restricts lock removal to the group specified by
group.address. The group address appears in hexadecimal
format on the LIST.READU report.
RECORD record.ID Restricts lock removal to the record specified by the
record ID.
Lock Type Description
FILELOCK Removes only file locks.
GROUPLOCK Removes only group locks and update record locks
associated with the group.
READULOCK Removes only update record locks.
READLLOCK Removes only shared record locks.
ALL Removes all locks.
UNLOCK Lock Types
Parameter Description
UNLOCK Parameters (Continued)
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Dzikiewicz
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 7:01 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] How to release locks (LIST.READU)
I dont believe LIST.LOCKS shows READ locks. Use LIST.READU EVERY to
see
all READU locks. Two commands for two different things. I dont know
of
any commands to release READU locks. The MASTER LOCKS command will
release
the synchronization locks, but not READU.
One thing you could do is to MASTER OFF the user. This is not always
the
best thing. You could walk over to their terminal and back them out of
what
they are doing. You could also make use of TANDEM to take control of
the
terminal and do the same thing (if you dont like walking).
If it is a deadlock, shown by LIST.READU EVERY, I always use the admin
menu,
deadlock administration to take care of it.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pankaj Gupta04
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 5:21 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] How to release locks (LIST.READU)
Hi All,
I am facing a strange problem with the locks. When I executed LIST.LOCKS
at
universe prompt, no locks were shown but when I executed LIST.READU, 7
records were displayed as locked.
I tried to CLEAR all the locks but was not able to do that. Can someone
tell
me how to release the locks which are displayed in LIST.READU output?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Pankaj Gupta
*** CAUTION - Disclaimer ** This e-mail
contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the
use
of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify
the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are
not
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any
other
person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain
viruses.
Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but
is
not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in
this
e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the
e-mail
or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the
content
of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or
from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS End of Disclaimer INFOSYS***
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To
RE: [U2] Training Courses
I personally think that Marcie does a wonderful job with training. She actually worked for PICK systems as their trainer back in the day. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Key Ally Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 11:47 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Training Courses Andrew, There are lots of excellent trainers. Here's some to get you started: Marcie Miller: http://www.discoverycomputersystems.com/default.htm Lee Burstein: http://dynamicsys.com/services.htm#Training Malcom Bull: http://members.aol.com/mbtraining/mbtlist.html Clifton Oliver http://oliver.com/main/Training.html [AD] Myself: [/AD] http://keyally.com/ - Chuck "Training and Mentoring" Barouch Andrew Lakeland wrote: >Hi all, >We are currently recruiting quite a few new IT people and as you know >spending time training them up is at first a drain on resources. We are >considering getting someone in to do some universe training. >Any recommendations of companies which provide such a service. >Regards >Andy --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Omni meat packing software
I worked on it for over 2 years. On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:59:40 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for someone who has worked on Omni meat packing software. > > Larry Okeson > Executive Vice President > Software Search > 1-800-949-5423 (toll free) > 770-934-5138 > Fax: 770-949-6410 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [u2] Community :: U2canXML :: Any examples of a valid extraction file?
There is a U2UG xml forum? On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:05:02 +1100, David Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Brian > > Thanks, however the member has solved the problem and listed the solution on > the U2UG xml forum > > Regards > David Jordan > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Q-pointers to system folder
One possible solution is this, say you have a folder that is located at C:\TextFiles. Edit a VOC entry called TEXTFILES and put the following: 001 F 002 C:\TextFiles save it. Then do the following CREATE.FILE DICT TEXTFILES 1,1,18. This will create the dictionary for this file Then in your code you could do the following: OPEN "TEXTFILES" TO TEXTFILES ELSE ABORT SELECT TEXTFILES LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE EXIT READ REC FROM TEXTFILES, ID THEN *Do stuff here END REPEAT Is this what you were looking for? On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:13:20 +, Jose Canseco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some years ago,I discover Universe as a very good tool for working with text > files, (Lot of helpfull data basic commands) Now I'm trying to use UV for > this purose, but geting access to DOS files, It's possible to do a "Q" > pointer or similar to work with all txt files in a Windws folder (001.txt, > 002.txt,.) work with this files and write back them in a diferent > folder? > > The procedure its simple but I'dont know who to work with dos folders from > basic. > > PD: What I Want to do is : > > Create Pointers > Run program, > >open files > select DOS files from the folder > read dos file, > modify items, > write in diferent place > repeat >Close > > Thanks in advance. > > _ > Acepta el reto MSN Premium: Proteccisn para tus hijos en internet. > Descargalo y pruibalo 2 meses gratis. > http://join.msn.com?XAPID=1697&DI=1055&HL=Footer_mailsenviados_proteccioninfantil > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Unix Print Commands...
The '<' is the input redirection character and the &1 is the first parameter passed into the shell script. It looks like this is trying to pass the first parameter passed into the shell script into the slp -c132 -i0 -n command. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:42:36 -0500, Brutzman, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When printing to our legacy Printronix P300 printer on our HP-Ux box, the > UniVerse spooler config is... > > Printer Name : PR0 > Unix PathName : /dev/c1t0d0_lp apparently direct to the > hardware. > Driver: /var/spool/uv/PR0.drvr containing... > > slp -c132 -i0 -n <&1 > cat - > > [slp] set print options for a non-serial printer...ugh > [-c132] 132 columns > [-i0] indent zero > [-n] set page size to infinity > > I need help understanding what the "<&1" does and how it all works with "cat > -". > > That way, perhaps we could get the printer to work as a shared network > device. > > Suggestions would be appreciated. > > --Bill > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] UV: Using UniAdmin/File Tool
Is there an entry in UV.ACCOUNT for the account whose file you are trying to access? On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:40:50 -0500, Hennessey, Mark F. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wanted to use the UniAdmin File Tool feature. However when I open the > Account Folder I only see files that exist 'within' the account. Most of our > files are spread out away from our uv account. LISTF has no trouble showing > that file XYZ is actually /dbms/subdirectory/XYZ. The VOC entry for XYZ > would look like: > F > /dbms/subdirectory/XYZ > /hist/dicts/D_XYZ > > Is there a way to get File Tool to "see" these remote files? Can file tool > be run without using UniAdmin? > > I'm using uv 10.0.8 and UniAdmin 1.0. > > Also - anyone know what uvfilefix_server is? > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Mark Hennessey > State of Connecticut > DSS/MIS Child Support Systems > Voice: 860-424-5261 > Fax: 860-424-4956 > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] COMMON question
Hello All, Question on COMMON. Is there a way to use COMMON so that any subroutine can use the COMMON variables for that account. I'm thinking I could write a program that will set some COMMON variables and run as a phantom job. I would then have other processes call subroutines that would use the variables that are set by this program in the COMMON area. Is this possible? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] and FoxPro?
ODBC seems to be too slow for what we are trying to do. We need to access a file that has almost 300,000 records. Is there a way to make this faster? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Wurlod Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 4:28 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] and FoxPro? No. This restriction went away at version 9.6 iirc. You can use an @SELECT phrase in the file dictionary to specifiy which fields are to be visible to ODBC clients. - Original Message - From: "Nick Cipollina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] and FoxPro? Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:12:16 -0500 > > If you use ODBC to access UV, don't you need to be using SQL tables in > UniVerse? > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] and FoxPro?
If you use ODBC to access UV, don't you need to be using SQL tables in UniVerse? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Taylor Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 1:57 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] and FoxPro? Not FoxPro, but I have done things with Access. I used basic ODBC connections to UV to create GUI, client-based front-ends in Access. It was mostly an experiment, but it worked fairly well. If FoxPro supports DB connections via ODBC (as it should) then you would need to install the U2 ODBC client and configure a connection. This is explained in a manual covering "Writing ODBC Applications". Rich Taylor | Senior Programmer/Analyst| VERTIS 250 W. Pratt Street | Baltimore, MD 21201 P 410.361.8688 | F 410.528.0319 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.vertisinc.com Vertis is the premier provider of targeted advertising, media, and marketing services that drive consumers to marketers more effectively. "The more they complicate the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain" - Montgomery Scott NCC-1701 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 8:35 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2][UV] and FoxPro? I am just wondering if anyone has ever written an app in FoxPro to access UniVerse, or UniData for that matter? Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] and FoxPro?
I am just wondering if anyone has ever written an app in FoxPro to access UniVerse, or UniData for that matter? Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
I thought I remembered something about this.
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Lewington
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:50 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Nick Cipollina wrote:
> Here is the code I am trying to use:
>
> us1 = null ;
> us1.HostPort = 7200;
> try
> {
> us1 =
>
UniObjects.OpenSession("Server","LoginName","Password","uvAccount","uvcs
> ");
>
>
> It is compiling just fine, I am getting an error when I run it though.
> Any suggestions?
OK - it will compile, but the us1.HostPort = 7200 bit is doing
absolutely
nothing.
The us1 returned by UniObjects.OpenSession is a new session with no
connection to the us1 with HostPort = 7200. This came up last November
on
the list, and IBM said that a fix would be available shortly:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.u2.general/30538/
Simon
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Bug, or "feature"? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Hewkin Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 11:27 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question I thought this was a bug in UV.NET, it can only use port 31438. Les -Original Message----- From: Nick Cipollina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 March 2005 15:43 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question Yes. No. I'm not sure if there was a reason. I would still like to know how to point to a different port, even if I could change it back to 31438. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:52 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question Are you on the same physical network as the target machine? Is there a firewall between you and it? What is the reasoning behind changing the rpc port to 7200? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee only. If you have received this message in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose the contents; please notify the sender immediately and delete the message. This message is attributed to the sender and may not necessarily reflect the view of Travis Perkins plc or its subsidiaries (Travis Perkins). Agreements binding Travis Perkins may not be concluded by means of e-mail communication. E-mail transmissions are not secure and Travis Perkins accepts no responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. Whilst steps have been taken to ensure that this message is virus free, Travis Perkins accepts no liability for infection and recommends that you scan this e-mail and any attachments. Part of Travis Perkins plc. Registered Office: Lodge Way House, Lodge Way, Harlestone Road, Northampton, NN5 7UG. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Sorry,
Private UniSession us1;
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:01 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
What have you declared us1 as?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Cipollina
Sent: 01 March 2005 13:42
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Here is the code I am trying to use:
us1 = null ;
us1.HostPort = 7200;
try
{
us1 =
UniObjects.OpenSession("Server","LoginName","Password","uvAccount","uvcs
");
It is compiling just fine, I am getting an error when I run it though.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 7:11 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
(this won't compile and is not meant to)
Have a look in the UniObjects .Net pdf file for more info on this, but
here's how you can change the port number used for the connection.
public UniSession uSession;
uSession.HostPort = 12345;
uSession = UniObjects.OpenSession("Server", "LoginName", "PassWord",
"uvAccount", "uvcs");
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:35:35 -0500, Nick Cipollina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How exactly can I do this?. (I'm new to .NET).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick Cipollina
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:29 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
>
> Check the UniSession property "HostPort". I believe that if you set
> it to match your host settings you should be OK.
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:46:52 -0500, Nick Cipollina
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Our rpc port is set to 7200. Is there something I need to change
> within
> > .NET to tell it to look for that port?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nick Cipollina
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
> > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 2:08 PM
> > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
> >
> > Make sure the remote machine has the uniobjects port enabled and
there
> > are no firewalls between you and it that also block this port. On
an
> > HP-UX machine this is port 31438. Have a look at the services file
in
> > /etc and make sure this line is in there somewhere.
> >
> > uvrpc 31438/tcp # uvNet rpc port
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:49:04 -0500, Nick Cipollina
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I've got a dumb UO.NET question to ask. I am trying to write a
> simple
> > > UO.NET program to connect to one of our UniVerse servers and I am
> > > getting the following error: "No connection could be made because
> the
> > > target machine actively refused it." Any ideas what I am missing?
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Nick Cipollina
> > >
> > > Pick Programmer
> > >
> > > ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc.
> > >
> > > 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210
> > >
> > > Richmond, VA 23294
> > >
> > > (804)644-8707 x 314
> > > ---
> > > u2-users mailing list
> > > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> > ---
> > u2-users mailing list
> > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> > ---
> > u2-users mailing list
> > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visi
RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Yes. No. I'm not sure if there was a reason. I would still like to know how to point to a different port, even if I could change it back to 31438. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:52 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question Are you on the same physical network as the target machine? Is there a firewall between you and it? What is the reasoning behind changing the rpc port to 7200? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Here is the code I am trying to use:
us1 = null ;
us1.HostPort = 7200;
try
{
us1 =
UniObjects.OpenSession("Server","LoginName","Password","uvAccount","uvcs
");
It is compiling just fine, I am getting an error when I run it though.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 7:11 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
(this won't compile and is not meant to)
Have a look in the UniObjects .Net pdf file for more info on this, but
here's how you can change the port number used for the connection.
public UniSession uSession;
uSession.HostPort = 12345;
uSession = UniObjects.OpenSession("Server", "LoginName", "PassWord",
"uvAccount", "uvcs");
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:35:35 -0500, Nick Cipollina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How exactly can I do this?. (I'm new to .NET).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick Cipollina
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:29 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
>
> Check the UniSession property "HostPort". I believe that if you set
> it to match your host settings you should be OK.
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:46:52 -0500, Nick Cipollina
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Our rpc port is set to 7200. Is there something I need to change
> within
> > .NET to tell it to look for that port?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nick Cipollina
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey
> > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 2:08 PM
> > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
> >
> > Make sure the remote machine has the uniobjects port enabled and
there
> > are no firewalls between you and it that also block this port. On
an
> > HP-UX machine this is port 31438. Have a look at the services file
in
> > /etc and make sure this line is in there somewhere.
> >
> > uvrpc 31438/tcp # uvNet rpc port
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:49:04 -0500, Nick Cipollina
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I've got a dumb UO.NET question to ask. I am trying to write a
> simple
> > > UO.NET program to connect to one of our UniVerse servers and I am
> > > getting the following error: "No connection could be made because
> the
> > > target machine actively refused it." Any ideas what I am missing?
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Nick Cipollina
> > >
> > > Pick Programmer
> > >
> > > ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc.
> > >
> > > 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210
> > >
> > > Richmond, VA 23294
> > >
> > > (804)644-8707 x 314
> > > ---
> > > u2-users mailing list
> > > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> > ---
> > u2-users mailing list
> > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> > ---
> > u2-users mailing list
> > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> ---
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
How exactly can I do this?. (I'm new to .NET). Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question Check the UniSession property "HostPort". I believe that if you set it to match your host settings you should be OK. On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:46:52 -0500, Nick Cipollina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our rpc port is set to 7200. Is there something I need to change within > .NET to tell it to look for that port? > > Thanks, > > Nick Cipollina > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 2:08 PM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question > > Make sure the remote machine has the uniobjects port enabled and there > are no firewalls between you and it that also block this port. On an > HP-UX machine this is port 31438. Have a look at the services file in > /etc and make sure this line is in there somewhere. > > uvrpc 31438/tcp # uvNet rpc port > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:49:04 -0500, Nick Cipollina > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I've got a dumb UO.NET question to ask. I am trying to write a simple > > UO.NET program to connect to one of our UniVerse servers and I am > > getting the following error: "No connection could be made because the > > target machine actively refused it." Any ideas what I am missing? > > Thanks. > > > > Nick Cipollina > > > > Pick Programmer > > > > ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. > > > > 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 > > > > Richmond, VA 23294 > > > > (804)644-8707 x 314 > > --- > > u2-users mailing list > > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Our rpc port is set to 7200. Is there something I need to change within .NET to tell it to look for that port? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Kibbey Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 2:08 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question Make sure the remote machine has the uniobjects port enabled and there are no firewalls between you and it that also block this port. On an HP-UX machine this is port 31438. Have a look at the services file in /etc and make sure this line is in there somewhere. uvrpc 31438/tcp # uvNet rpc port On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:49:04 -0500, Nick Cipollina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I've got a dumb UO.NET question to ask. I am trying to write a simple > UO.NET program to connect to one of our UniVerse servers and I am > getting the following error: "No connection could be made because the > target machine actively refused it." Any ideas what I am missing? > Thanks. > > Nick Cipollina > > Pick Programmer > > ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. > > 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 > > Richmond, VA 23294 > > (804)644-8707 x 314 > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] UO.NET beginner question
Hello all, I've got a dumb UO.NET question to ask. I am trying to write a simple UO.NET program to connect to one of our UniVerse servers and I am getting the following error: "No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it." Any ideas what I am missing? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Forcing a port to close
This is exactly what I am getting. The process is stopped, but for whatever reason, UniVerse is not closing and cleaning up the port. The program in question has LOGTO statements in it, and I think that it is causing itself to get crossed up on the socket port. If I include the following statement, will it help: X = setSocketOptions(SOCKETHANDLE, "REUSEADDR" : @VM : 1) Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen B Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:13 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2][UV] Forcing a port to close This is a typical socket address condition that can't be safely overridden by hand. If you look at your net stats, the socket in question is probably in a CLOSE_WAIT state. This is a subsystem status that says the remote has shutdown and it's waiting for the socket to close and cleanup. If the socket gets dumped improperly by the socket application, then the socket can be left in CLOSE_WAIT with no process attached to finish cleanup. The status will clear up, but it could take a long time. That all depends on the tcp_close_wait setup and whether or not the socket is setup with the SO_LINGER flag. If the socket's SO_REUSEADDR flag can be enabled using some kind of U2 "setsocketopt" function before you listen on it, then you can re-use the same socket address over and over again. Check out this sockets FAQ: http://www.unixguide.net/network/socketfaq/ Glen http://picksource.com http://mvdevcentral.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nick Cipollina > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 4:20 PM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: [U2][UV] Forcing a port to close > > > Is anyone aware of a way to force a socket port to close at the > operating system level. We are currently using Sun 9.xx. We have a > process that opens a port and accepts socket connections. Whenever we > stop it and try to restart it, we get a port in use message. The only > way that I've been able to get it to release the port is to stop and > start universe again. I'm just wondering if there is a way to force the > port to close. Thanks. > > > > Nick Cipollina > > > > Pick Programmer > > ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. > > 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 > > Richmond, VA 23294 > > (804)644-8707 x 314 > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] Forcing a port to close
Is anyone aware of a way to force a socket port to close at the operating system level. We are currently using Sun 9.xx. We have a process that opens a port and accepts socket connections. Whenever we stop it and try to restart it, we get a port in use message. The only way that I've been able to get it to release the port is to stop and start universe again. I'm just wondering if there is a way to force the port to close. Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts
This is exactly what I was looking for!! Thank you very much. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dianne Ackerman Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:59 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2][UV] Synonym Accounts There is a command called "IAM" in universe that does that. So on the TEST account you can create a VOC paragraph called TEST.SYN and put PA :@AM: IAM TEST.SYN That paragraph would only run when you logged to TEST.SYN, it wouldn't change anything if you logged to just TEST That might work. -Dianne Nick Cipollina wrote: >Is there a way to set up a synonym account in UniVerse. Say I have an >account called TEST and the path to the account is /home/TEST. I want >to create an account called TEST.SYN who's path is also /home/TEST. I >have figured out if I edit a record in UV.ACCOUNT called TEST.SYN and >put /home/TEST in field 11 that I can logto TEST.SYN and it will take me >there, but when I type in WHO it tells me the account is TEST. I want >to set up the account so that when I say WHO it tells me TEST.SYN, but >is actually using all of TEST's VOC entries. Is this possible in >UniVerse? Thanks. > > > >Nick Cipollina > > > >Pick Programmer > >ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. > >2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 > >Richmond, VA 23294 > >(804)644-8707 x 314 >--- --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] Synonym Accounts
Is there a way to set up a synonym account in UniVerse. Say I have an account called TEST and the path to the account is /home/TEST. I want to create an account called TEST.SYN who's path is also /home/TEST. I have figured out if I edit a record in UV.ACCOUNT called TEST.SYN and put /home/TEST in field 11 that I can logto TEST.SYN and it will take me there, but when I type in WHO it tells me the account is TEST. I want to set up the account so that when I say WHO it tells me TEST.SYN, but is actually using all of TEST's VOC entries. Is this possible in UniVerse? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] - Keeping subroutines in memory
Yeah, I thought of CHAINing another phantom. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cordes, Tom (contractor) Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:33 AM To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org' Subject: RE: [U2][UV] - Keeping subroutines in memory Nick, Have the phantom start another instance of itself & then die? Tom Cordes, GFM project. -Original Message- From: Nick Cipollina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 09, 2005 9:06 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject:[U2][UV] - Keeping subroutines in memory We have a phantom process running on several of our UniVerse servers that we use to do updates to various accounts. This process calls a subroutine that actually performs the updates. Before it calls this subroutine, it calls another subroutine to see if there are any updates for the update subroutine and applies the changes. The problem that we are having is that the phantom seems to be keeping the subroutine in memory, so that if we have a change to it, the phantom process is not picking up the change. Is there any way that we can force the phantom process to remove the subroutine from memory when an update arrives and pick up the new version of the subroutine? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2][UV] - Keeping subroutines in memory
Yes, I had thought of doing this, but I was hoping there was some way to clear the subroutine from memory in the phantom, or force the phantom to pick the subroutine back up from the catalog space. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Weissman Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 9:48 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2][UV] - Keeping subroutines in memory Remove the arguments (if there are any) and put them on a data base file. Then make the subroutine a program that reads that data from the file. EXECUTE it, don't CALL it. - Original Message - From: "Nick Cipollina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 9:06 AM Subject: [U2][UV] - Keeping subroutines in memory > We have a phantom process running on several of our UniVerse servers > that we use to do updates to various accounts. This process calls a > subroutine that actually performs the updates. Before it calls this > subroutine, it calls another subroutine to see if there are any updates > for the update subroutine and applies the changes. The problem that we > are having is that the phantom seems to be keeping the subroutine in > memory, so that if we have a change to it, the phantom process is not > picking up the change. Is there any way that we can force the phantom > process to remove the subroutine from memory when an update arrives and > pick up the new version of the subroutine? Thanks. > > > > Nick Cipollina > > > > Pick Programmer > > ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. > > 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 > > Richmond, VA 23294 > > (804)644-8707 x 314 > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV] - Keeping subroutines in memory
We have a phantom process running on several of our UniVerse servers that we use to do updates to various accounts. This process calls a subroutine that actually performs the updates. Before it calls this subroutine, it calls another subroutine to see if there are any updates for the update subroutine and applies the changes. The problem that we are having is that the phantom seems to be keeping the subroutine in memory, so that if we have a change to it, the phantom process is not picking up the change. Is there any way that we can force the phantom process to remove the subroutine from memory when an update arrives and pick up the new version of the subroutine? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe full screen editor
While in the ED editor, CTRL + SHIFT + 6 will insert an attribute mark, CTRL + ] will insert a multi-value mark and CTRL + \ will insert a sub-value mark. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Clark Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 2:26 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Universe full screen editor I don't think that universe on NT includes any form of VI, or any other full screen editor out of the box. You can make your changes using ED, as some other respondants have demonstrated, but if you don't want to learn ED incantations, you could copy your items to a type 1 file (similar to a DIR file in unidata) and use windows notepad/wordpad or good old DOS EDIT or whatever you have. Depending on the editor you choose, getting the value and subvalue marks into the item could be a problem, but I've always had luck using cut and paste on the marks that are already in the item, or you could use the windows ALT-0253 sequence (on the numeric keypad) to enter a value mark, and ALT-0252 to enter a sub-value, or you could fire up charmap (if it's installed) and cut and paste from that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 1:14 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Universe full screen editor UV.VI FILE ITEM will allow you to use vi to edit the record. While in the EDitor, type HELP and then either type a Character (C for Change) or press ENTER to see everything scroll off your screen before you can read it. . . HTH, Karl > I am working on a client's Universe server with no documentation. The > client is using software they purchased. I need to update a few records > that have multivalues and the ED help doesn't say how I can insert or > replace values. > > Does a full screen editor come with Universe? Or is there some way to > call a full screen editor from the operating system? > > Typing listu gets me a user named "NT AUTHORITY\system". While logging > off and back on I get the following text "Vmark Universe" and "Universe > Command Language 9.4". > > I am normally a Unidata programmer so this is a bit of a struggle. > > Thank you for your assistance, > Scott Land > Senior Programmer > USA 800, Inc. > --- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > -- Karl L. Pearson Director of IT, ATS Industrial Supply Direct: 801-978-4429 Toll-free: 800-789-9300 1,29 Fax: 801-972-3888 http://www.atsindustrial.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Unidata Training
Marcie Miller, formerly of Discovery Computer Systems still does onsite training. If you'd like, I'll send you her contact info. Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Harbeson Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 10:30 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Unidata Training IBM offers training. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimmy Dixon Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 9:48 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Unidata Training Greetings one and all: I have to admit that I have been lurking around the list for the past several months, in an effort to see what the list is all about. I am new to the Unidata arena, and from what I am seeing, there is a lot to be learned to use it effectively. Our accounting system is built on Unidata (v 6.0). I have very little in the way of documentation, due to the fact, that the software company wants you to go through them to get anything done. This is a very expensive proposition to say the least. I am wondering what type of "getting started with Unidata" information is out there. If y'all have suggestions on resources that I can learn Unibasic that would be great. Thanks for the help. Jimmy Dixon MCSE W2K, MSDBA, MSCA, MCP, CHCP CompTIA A+, i-net+, e-Biz+, IT Project+ Certified Professional --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Universe account Name/ID
@WHO will tell you which account you are running on. OCONV("", "U50BB")
will give you the PORT and Account.
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Woodward
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 1:20 PM
To: U2-Users List
Subject: [U2] Universe account Name/ID
Hi Folks.
I'm trying to find the simplest way to figure out which account a
program is running in, within the program. Basically, between a
development/testing account and the live account. I've got a number of
ways to extrapolate where I am but I'm hoping that there is some system
variable that has the current account info that I can directly access
either at a TCL command or via a BASIC variable. Also, I need to be
able to do this from both, an interactive session and from a phantom.
Environment: Win2k, Universe 10.0.15
Bob Woodward
Programmer/Analyst
Harbor Wholesale Grocery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UV] Time Output Conversion
Is there an output conversion for time that will include the milliseconds? If I have a time that is 10:35:14 am and there are 35 milliseconds, how can I convert this to include them? Thanks. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
