this cardinal rule...
dennis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Clif Oliver
Sent: 06 April 2004 06:06
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: Modern Universe (TESTING)
*** END OF THREAD ***
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD ANY FURTHER
Excellent idea. I will make sure it gets passed along to the new hosts.
Thank you.
--
Regards,
Clif
On Apr 8, 2004, at 1:14 AM, Dennis Bartlett wrote:
A bit late in the day, but it would be better if you put END
OF THREAD
in the subject line as those of us who selectively read
--
u2-users
I am kind of enjoying it.
Glenn W. Paschal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/05/2004 10:53 PM
Please respond to U2 Users Discussion List
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Why
]
04/05/2004 10:53 PM
Please respond to U2 Users Discussion List
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Why is this thread here? And, why is it still continuing?
Can we stop now?
--Glenn.
-Original Message
In a message dated 4/4/2004 11:28:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
The other day.. i was inspecting a UV File with a UV Developer, he ran a
COUNT FILENAME
on our Customer Master... (BTW Quad CPU 4GHZ)... It took 12-15 Minutes to
get a result
back from UV. The file only
In a message dated 4/4/2004 11:30:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Personally I would be surprised if either database had a
way of handling
leading wildcards other than an exhaustive scan.
Use Contains/English Query. See MS-SQL Server Docs.
Joe Eugene
Joe you
Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage an Evolution in Software Development
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 5 April 2004 2:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Modern Universe (TESTING)
In a message dated 4/4
+61 417 268 665
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joe Eugene
Sent: Tuesday, 6 April 2004 8:40 AM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Will,
Joe I think Zero is an exagerration.
This is NOT an Exaggeration
Will,
Joe I think Zero is an exagerration.
This is NOT an Exaggeration, these are TEST Results from well
maintained
SQL Tables.
So you're claiming that the query literally takes ZERO time - or in other
words that MS SQL Server is INFINITELY fast in performing this particular
query?
In
]
Behalf Of Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 7:42 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Hi Joe,
I must admit to being completely baffled as to your point. Are you
1) Trying to prove you know something about MS SQL?
2) Trying to prove you
PM
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Will,
Joe I think Zero is an exagerration.
This is NOT an Exaggeration, these are TEST Results from well
maintained
SQL Tables.
So you're claiming that the query literally takes ZERO time - or in other
words that MS
If you Dont Agree, Prove it... Everybody can Talk.. Where are your Test
Results?
The problem with performance tests is that there are so many variables. And
then if you remove a lot of the variables to perform a lab test, that does
not reflect real world.
So then you try and make your lab
*** END OF THREAD ***
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD ANY FURTHER
(That means *anyone* not just the poster of the message used for the
Moderator reply)
On Apr 5, 2004, at 7:54 PM, Andrew Gissing wrote:
If you Dont Agree, Prove it... Everybody can Talk.. Where are your
Test
Results?
The problem
In a message dated 4/4/2004 9:11:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One thing I think everyone's missed (deliberately or otherwise)
wildcard (WHERE address LIKE '%EXPLORATION').
I brought this up a couple of times, nobody seemed to be interested
to check the
]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Modern Universe (TESTING)
In a message dated 4/4/2004 9:11:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One thing I think everyone's missed (deliberately or otherwise)
wildcard (WHERE address LIKE '%EXPLORATION
One thing I think everyone's missed (deliberately or otherwise) was that Sara's
original post had a constraint with a LEADING wildcard (WHERE address LIKE
'%EXPLORATION').
The argument that has been raging since has used examples with TRAILING wildcards
(WHERE name LIKE 'Sara%').
Apples and
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Ray,
I see you are doing a few things here, am not quite sure i understand.
The only way i have OUR UV Programmers using BASIC/PICK do this
is like
SELECT [FILENAME] WITH [FIELDNAME] LIKE 'SARA]' (NOTE **]* - Syntax might
a bit OFF
Joe Eugene wrote on 03/31/2004 02:59:29 PM:
Please post your PICK/BASIC and SQL Query.. so we i can learn
the magic you did on the PICK Side.
Joe,
Unless I'm missing something, Sara used the SQL statement against the
UniVerse database. Perhaps you weren't aware that UniVerse supports
Joe,
You can use an SQL query against normal UV files in the same manner you
would agains tables.
Cheers,
Stewart
-Original Message-
From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 1 April 2004 6:03
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Tim
- Original Message -
From: Joe Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:33:20 -0500
To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Tim,
My apologies... Yes, i know UV has a SQL Interface but i didnt think
many UV Programmers used
PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ray Wurlod
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 3:57 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
On this basis here are the RetrieVe equivalents for my earlier
post. The main difference is that there's more than one verb (for
different query result formats
Sara,
Can you please post your Query and results... Cause I am seeing the
EXACT Opposite...as I posted earlier.
Oracle Query is what?
Select firstName from Customers where firstName like 'Sar%';
The above takes about 7-9 Times More Time to get any results on Our UV
QUAD PROCESSOR MACHINE.
of operating on a
single processor machine of whatever rating it has (and obviously, memory,
other applications running, etc... impact that)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Joe Eugene
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Sent: 3/30/2004 6:07 PM
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Sara,
Can you
Subject
03/30/2004 04:36 RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
PM
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
I think the results point out the fallacy of your arguments. It
shows,
pretty definitevly, that UV can and does perform as well/better as
Oracle,
albeit under certain circumstances (ie, I'm sure other kinds of
queries
could produce different
Hello Dave,
At 09:36 AM 31/03/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, one thing I did want to address is your QUAD processor point.
You've made it a few times, and I just had to point out that it is
irrelevant to the discussion. While UV will take native advantage of
multi-processors in it's
that, not really sure on
that one...)
Eric Y. Neu
Sr. Programmer Analyst
Zetron, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Joe Eugene
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:07 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Sara
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
I think the results point out the fallacy of your arguments. It
shows,
pretty definitevly, that UV can and does perform as well
engine to perform a merge-sort similar to what you describe.
Just didn't seem that this called for such a need.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Robert Colquhoun
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Sent: 3/30/2004 7:01 PM
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Hello Dave,
At 09:36 AM 31/03/2004
Eugene
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Sent: 3/30/2004 6:56 PM
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Dave,
I think the results point out the fallacy of your arguments.
The results Sara posted here does NOT Prove anything, cause my results
show the EXACT Opposite.
So the deciding factor
Well Said Sara.
- Original Message -
From: Sara Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:57 PM
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
As requested
My queries were done on our machine reasonably early in the morning before
there were a lot
31 matches
Mail list logo
