Pierrot wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to set the nocache attribute of the tag controller of the
struts-config.xml to false so that my JSP pages won't be cached by either IE or
Firefox but to no avail. I've also included the following script to the
mainlayout.jsp file from which all my JSP files ext
We'll need to see the relevant parts of your struts-config.xml too
(specifically, the form bean and action mapping definitions).
L.
Carl Smith wrote:
I have a jsp containing an indexed test box field, and I need to validate the
user enter a value into all the text boxes when clicking on the s
Jack, I think folks on this list have heard enough complaining and
whinning by you and others. You claim that your right of free speech is
being violated, but all I have heard from you is insults. This is a list
for professional developers, not gangsters!
Also, how are contributing by claiming
Eamonn:
The plugin gets the specific ModuleConfig for the module in which the
element appears. If you want to perform a certain setup
operation in several modules, then each of them should repeat the
same element (or as close to the same as is appropriate.)
If you only put the element in
I don't know about you, but my email comes organized so that I can easily
work around anything that happens on a list. I would think that this is
fairly normal and something we could expect? I can remember when the dev
list would say "Heh, take that stuff to the user list". But, if things go
to
Dakota,
Thanks for wanting my input :-) I am not looking for censorship,
but I am looking for productive discussions and sometimes that means
pruning one discussion for the sake of another. I tend to agree that
this thread should move onto the dev board; it seems to be the appropraite
place, in my
Unless you had different logic books in school than I did, Craig,
"including" does not mean "excluding all else". I am here to communicate
with other developers that are using STruts for their own applications and
part of that is the concern about how the development process here has been
failing.
Well, I for one would be interested in what you have to say, Paul. I think
it is too bad that you feel you cannot answer on this list. That is as
close to a tragedy as it gets. I cannot believe how censorship works on
this list. What a sad thing. I want to get peoples' ideas on this. I
cannot
Hi,
I have multiple modules configured in my web application
I want to in the init() method of my plugin
1. read a file with some info
2. find a particular ModConfig object corresponding to 1 of my modules
3. According to the info in the file create and add FormBeanConfig
objects to that ModConf
Why does anyone want to stop a thread? If it stops it stops? What is the
motivation for stopping a discussion? This seems really, really strange. If
you don't want to participate, don't. If you don't like what is being said,
have your own say. But to want other people to stop talking? That is
It has been taken off track by your backers, Craig. There were some
questions raised about why Struts failed and how it might be good to look at
how this list behaves. This is the only forum for that discussion. You get
people that are wonderfully happy with the list that take that concern down
this might be of interest. very easy to integrate into your application:
http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/
HTMLArea is also something cool.
What is your problem with this thread, Mark. Why can you just not STAND it
if the people who are talking talk? Why do you want them to be SILENT? You
talk about other people soiling, smearing, etc., and you are one of the
worse offenders. Jonathon comes on here and makes a few legitimate points
Johnathan,
I am going to eat my own advice. I am going to respond
to this privately :) Expect an email soon.
Paul
--- Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Benedict wrote:
> > +1 with Frank and Craig. Unless you need to have your viewpoint
> > continuously heard in public, some of
I believe the user group is for user questions about Struts;
if I had to pick a place for questions like these, they really
belong on the dev list so the casual user isn't loaded down
with internal disputations and disagreements.
--- Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McClanahan
Okay, Dave?!? I guess you are right after all: non-public open-source
projects are really quite normal, right? Keep truckin'!
On 3/25/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dakota Jack wrote:
> > This is going to be one of my all time favorites. Brought a HUGE grin
> to my
> > face.
> >
If people want to talk, Mark, what do you care? You and a few other drones
come on and beg people to stop talking. What is that about? Who in the hell
do you think you are to dictate who wants to talk? You always have these
facists tendencies? The trouble is that the truth hurts. Why don't you
I fully understand Struts, Martin. Struts is fairly easy to understand. I
work with code that makes Struts look like tinker toys. I also understand
that Struts cannot be organized by the MVC paradigm and have discussed that
at length many times on the list. Ted is right that only loose coupling
Well, you managed to avoid the whole issue again, Raeburn. Do you ever
address a topic?
On 3/25/06, Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I normally ignore your crap and I'm sorry for prolonging this agony for
> everyone. This really will be my last word.
>
> Michael, why do you continue t
On 3/25/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > On 3/25/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>The question is, at the very least, broadly on-topic.
> >
> >
> >
> > This interpretation is wildly out of sync with the formal description of
> >
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
While reading "Java Web Framework Sweet Spots" by Matt Raible [1] I
found the following opinion by Patrick Lightbody:
"Like any action framework, WebWork is poor at handling state and
wizards. If you're writing lots of long-running wizards, perhaps JSF
is the way to go."
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 3/25/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The question is, at the very least, broadly on-topic.
This interpretation is wildly out of sync with the formal description of
this mailing list's purpose[1], quoted below:
Subscribe to this list to communi
While reading "Java Web Framework Sweet Spots" by Matt Raible [1] I
found the following opinion by Patrick Lightbody:
"Like any action framework, WebWork is poor at handling state and
wizards. If you're writing lots of long-running wizards, perhaps JSF
is the way to go."
I would like to plug in m
Paul Benedict wrote:
+1 with Frank and Craig. Unless you need to have your viewpoint
continuously heard in public, some of the latter postings can be
shared privately. Most of it was good, and I think it generated
much good; thanks for sharing.
Well, my problem on this right now is that I jus
On 3/25/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The question is, at the very least, broadly on-topic.
This interpretation is wildly out of sync with the formal description of
this mailing list's purpose[1], quoted below:
Subscribe to this list to communicate with other developers
Java Web Framework Sweet Spots - by Matt Raible
http://www.virtuas.com/articles/webframework-sweetspots.html
I selected relevant responses by the following representatives:
JSF, Jacob Hookom
Seam, Gavin King
Spring MVC, Rob Harrop
Spring Web Flow, Rob Harrop and Keith Donald
Stripes, Tim Fennell
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 3/25/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Lowe wrote:
Look.. You've been invited to post your thoughts about the way that
apache do stuff, to a more appropiate audience than a bunch of
half-wit struts users like me..
Mark, I was involved in a conve
+1 with Frank and Craig. Unless you need to have your viewpoint
continuously heard in public, some of the latter postings can be
shared privately. Most of it was good, and I think it generated
much good; thanks for sharing.
--- "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McClanahan w
Craig McClanahan wrote:
No matter where the conversation developed, it has gone in directions that
are off topic on this list. Please feel free to continue the conversation,
but do it somewhere else.
(About to break my own "I'm done posting in this thread" rule)...
Even I, as someone who was
On 3/25/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark Lowe wrote:
> > Look.. You've been invited to post your thoughts about the way that
> > apache do stuff, to a more appropiate audience than a bunch of
> > half-wit struts users like me..
>
> Mark, I was involved in a conversation with
On 3/25/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Lowe wrote:
> > Look.. You've been invited to post your thoughts about the way that
> > apache do stuff, to a more appropiate audience than a bunch of
> > half-wit struts users like me..
>
> Mark, I was involved in a conversation with v
Mark Lowe wrote:
Look.. You've been invited to post your thoughts about the way that
apache do stuff, to a more appropiate audience than a bunch of
half-wit struts users like me..
Mark, I was involved in a conversation with various people. It so
happens that the conversation developed here.
Look.. You've been invited to post your thoughts about the way that
apache do stuff, to a more appropiate audience than a bunch of
half-wit struts users like me..
I was using "smear" more in the context of "to soil"
You might have a point, you might not, you could be the next pope for
all i care.
Mark Lowe wrote:
May I +1000 what steve said, I'm all for a bit of digression, but this
thread has narrowed the sematic gap between "to post" and "to smear"..
What smear? Do you mean "smear" as in "slander"? Could you be more
explicit about this? I think you ought to clarify what you mean by t
Dakota Jack wrote:
> If you are smart, go elsewhere where things are not this nuts.
>
*ponder*
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dakota Jack wrote:
> As to the rest, so far as I can tell, you are the troll, my friend.
>
*rotflmao*
And I am most certainly NOT your friend.
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mai
Dakota Jack wrote:
> While sitting in the biggest pile of crap code one could imagine,
Oo, heavens no.
Maybe you haven't seen much code, but believe me: it gets much, much,
MUCH worse.
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Dakota Jack wrote:
> This is going to be one of my all time favorites. Brought a HUGE grin to my
> face.
>
Weird, but okay.
If you are addressing the apparent dichotomy with "publicly-accessible"
and "open-source" then you probably just don't know very much, but I'll
talk slowly, as there are
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
> When people do start using their commit privileges they are usually
> quite timid about it initially and initiate discussion on your list
> prior to doing anything remotely controversial. People typically start
> off doing very small localized things. And these things are
May I +1000 what steve said, I'm all for a bit of digression, but this
thread has narrowed the sematic gap between "to post" and "to smear"..
Its just become some sick kind of dirty protest
http://pso.hmprisonservice.gov.uk/pso1700/DIRTY%20PROTESTS.htm..
Mark
On 3/25/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL
Hi
Of course it is a great example :) My sentiment was more in the "posting"
line of JSF
Hermod
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Gary VanMatre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. mars 2006 14:41
Til: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: SV: [shale] Best practice for passin
>From: Hermod Opstvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi
>
> 1.
> Thanks, I looked at Gary's Rolodex example, and the QueryParam valueholder
> seems like another way of doing it. This also allows for moving between
> arbitrary pages. Not quite JSFish though.
>
Ah come on, it's a great example of
Maybe you can leverage the LazyActionForm:
http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/userGuide/building_controller.html#lazy_action_form_classes
Hubert
On 3/24/06, Will Hartung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simply put I have a need for a configurable form that can have any mixture
> of fields on it
Dave Newton wrote:
Jonathan Revusky wrote:
I have no publicly-accessible open-source projects. If I did, I would
not give commit access to anybody that asked for it, because I do not
have the time to review the contributions of others and do not trust J.
Random Coder enough to assume that th
Steven-
A multi-threaded enterprise wide solution that is organised according to
true Model View Controller paradigm is NOT a pile of crap nor is anything
else you dont understand-
I would strongly suggest you think about all of the hard work and effort
that the commiters and people on this li
Steve Raeburn wrote:
I normally ignore your crap and I'm sorry for prolonging this agony for
everyone. This really will be my last word.
Michael, why do you continue to waste your time on such a "big pile of
crap" as Struts? What kind of a fool must you be for using the world's
worst web fram
I normally ignore your crap and I'm sorry for prolonging this agony for
everyone. This really will be my last word.
Michael, why do you continue to waste your time on such a "big pile of
crap" as Struts? What kind of a fool must you be for using the world's
worst web framework, run by a bunch
Here's something you may find handy
http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/manual/2.6/guide.html
googlebot.*
^(.*);jsessionid=.*(\?.*)$
$1$2
On 3/25/06, Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sessionid's can cause problems, some spiders understand
> ;jsessionid=[the id] is part of the url. T
Sessionid's can cause problems, some spiders understand
;jsessionid=[the id] is part of the url. Therefore everytime the bot
comes around it thinks its a different page.
The usual thing to do is remove sessionid for spiders. Attention needs
to be paid in case the application depends on the session
Hello, I'm trying to set the nocache attribute of the tag controller of the
struts-config.xml to false so that my JSP pages won't be cached by either IE or
Firefox but to no avail. I've also included the following script to the
mainlayout.jsp file from which all my JSP files extend: My applicati
It is Struts that is confused, not this person. If you are smart, go
elsewhere where things are not this nuts.
On 3/24/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As far as products, right now there is Action and Shale.
>
> Most people familiar with Action might just say 'Struts' and there
The fact is that there will not be an explanation for this failure. While
sitting in the biggest pile of crap code one could imagine, they continue to
extoll their virtues as if they were about to be mentioned for an honorarium
in computer history.
On 3/24/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is going to be one of my all time favorites. Brought a HUGE grin to my
face.
On 3/24/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have no publicly-accessible open-source projects.
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
I could not bear the thought of having some of these committers talk about
my code when they have trouble with the English language, much less Java.
On 3/24/06, Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> > On 3/24/06, Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
Good God, Michael, he was trying to be sarcastic and only reached sardonic
but fooled you. Do you actually think a lightbulb like Raeburn would be
agreeing with Revusky? Don't you realize that Raeburn is another one of
"DOH" bunch?
On 3/24/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On
I don't think you see, Steve, that this sardonic cuteness misses the whole
point. While you seem to think you have it all going on, this in fact is
inane. No one in their right mind without some political in or position
would take much time to contribute to Struts, because the process is
complete
Hi
1.
Thanks, I looked at Gary's Rolodex example, and the QueryParam valueholder
seems like another way of doing it. This also allows for moving between
arbitrary pages. Not quite JSFish though.
2.
I think that the might be what I want here.
Hermod
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PR
Hi
The method exists on my bean with the correct methodsignature.
I had "stolen" this from your excellent rolodex example, and there you had
it defined as:
So I thought that I could substitute the hardcoded name with a Cl
Turns out you were talking about, as I understand you, code in company as
opposed to code on an open source project. This is totally irrelevant. The
issue is not whether there are people who make mistakes in companies. The
issue is about open source. Those are not the same. So, do you have any
Again, sigh, this is irrelevant. This is so off the topic and the point.
How you could think this is relevant is truly a mystery.
On 3/24/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dakota Jack wrote:
> > I flat don't believe this. Who, what, where, when, etc?
> >
>
> This isn't me (although
60 matches
Mail list logo
