Damn, I thought I had you in my junk list - play nice spammer and keep
one address?
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:34:15 -0800, Marc Perkel
supp...@junkemailfilter.com wrote:
OK - I'm getting mass checking set up and working. I'm still in the
testing phase.
Right now the process of selecting spam and
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:14:33 + (UTC), Walter Hurry
walterhu...@lavabit.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:11:49 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 09:06, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 30.11.11 00:17, Alex wrote:
I have two fedora15 boxes that process mail for a few domains,
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:08:42 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 20.09.11 18:57, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I moved SA to a newer box and have the following output in my logs:
http://pastebin.com/VvZfXwAC
Apologies if I'm being dense, but is there a way to trace what may
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 00:59:29 +0200, Michelle Konzack
linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net wrote:
Hello rstarkov,
Am 2011-04-09 15:50:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Does your header definitely include an ESMTP marker as per the RFC? Mine
didn't; that was the real issue. We didn't find a bug in
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 04:22:40 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann
guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 12:58 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Unrelated but reminded me I hadn't posted a thanks to all those that
responded about the sa-update rules. That's partly because I'm
awaiting permission
Unrelated but reminded me I hadn't posted a thanks to all those that
responded about the sa-update rules. That's partly because I'm
awaiting permission from clients to add their mails to the corpus.
So, thanks all. Apologies for forgetting my manners.
Have no clue about Spear Phishing other than
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been covered, an admittedly fairly cursory
Google showed nothing new. My local sa-update hasn't updated in the
better part of a month. Is it that there have been no updates or do I
need to dig into my systems to see what I broke, how and when?
Regards to all
Nigel
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:26:07 -0500, David F. Skoll
d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:09:42 +0100
Matthias Leisi matth...@leisi.net wrote:
I'm not sure whether that would be more appropriate for the dev list,
but I guess this is relevant/of interest to the SpamAssassin
This is a long and somewhat complex story. I've been running my own
mail for 15+ years or so, always on a fixed IP. A few years ago
business picked up so I got some additional IP's from my supplier
(BT); it turned out that they were decommissioned DUL's renewed as
statics. Initially we jumped the
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:04:18 +, corpus.defero
corpus.def...@idnet.com wrote:
Ultimately, this seems to be more of a witch hunt against SORBS than a
SA issue. Although I'm not opposed to a SORBS witch hunt, I don't think
it belongs here.
Indeed, and it's Lynford and his money grabbing
Hi All,
Is sorbs going to be continued as a scoring option in SA?
Having hit yet more problems with them I've zeroed their scoring.
I found this a couple of days ago, maybe it can add weight.
http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2010/12/gfi-sorbs-considered-harmful/
Best to all
Nigel
Those are not optional modules.
You can either install them from CPAN or from yum (depending on the
repo you use)
As a rule if it says REQUIRED, it probably is :-)
Apologies if this is teaching you to suck eggs:
In CPAN type: install Digest::SHA
Or in yum, do yum list available and look in
I've not been paying much attention to the list, silly season and
work/home preassures.
Of late I've had some truly horrific backscatter issues, enough to
pretty much drop my primary mail. I suspect it's an artifact of the
server, which is being swapped out, since it only happens on the rdns
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:22:16 +0100, Martin Gregorie
mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 08:43 -0400, Lee Dilkie wrote:
First, I'd like to point out that not everyone has the option of
changing ISP's. Believe it or not, there are many folks who have only
one choice for high-speed
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:59:57 +0100, corpus.defero
corpus.def...@idnet.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 16:50 +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
We're on a BT only exchange here so it's them or nothing, well not
quite, I could go CoLo... hmmm maybe not, or satellite, I was involved
in setting
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:48:49 +0100, corpus.defero
corpus.def...@idnet.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 17:19 +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:59:57 +0100, corpus.defero
corpus.def...@idnet.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 16:50 +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
We're
Hi All,
Am I the only one incabale of figuring out the SORBS interface?
I'm told by various mailserver that sorbs is blocking me (including
this list hence mailing from my gmail account).
When I log on to sorbs, give my details I get a nice email back saying:
$Id: Act.pm,v 1.16 2006/11/27
On 20 April 2010 14:13, corpus.defero corpus.def...@idnet.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 14:04 +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
Am I the only one incabale of figuring out the SORBS interface?
I'm told by various mailserver that sorbs is blocking me (including
this list hence mailing
My IP has full rDNS supplied by my ISP - please feel free to ping -a
217.36.54.209 and tell me what exactly is wrong wit that?
On 20 April 2010 16:08, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On tir 20 apr 2010 15:04:53 CEST, Nigel Frankcom wrote
If anyone has any ideas - please let me know
On 20 April 2010 18:07, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On tir 20 apr 2010 18:56:37 CEST, John Hardin wrote
not correct, hotmail gmail yahoo works without isp dependice, why care ?
You're kidding, right, Benny?
does it looks so ?
Why care that the ISP providing my IP addresses can't
On 20 April 2010 18:29, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.org wrote:
On tir 20 apr 2010 19:17:10 CEST, Nigel Frankcom wrote
My IP has full rDNS supplied by my ISP - please feel free to ping -a
217.36.54.209 and tell me what exactly is wrong wit that?
http://www.db.ripe.net/whois?form_type
Hi All,
Apologies if this has already been asked. A hunt through Google didn't
help much nor did any digging around the SA site. That's not to say
it's not there, just that I can't find it :-/
I have Razor2 installed via CPAN, though without a version number.
When I try and install the new SA I
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:12:16 +, Nigel Frankcom
ni...@blue-canoe.com wrote:
Hi All,
Apologies if this has already been asked. A hunt through Google didn't
help much nor did any digging around the SA site. That's not to say
it's not there, just that I can't find it :-/
I have Razor2 installed
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:08:17 -0400, Alex mysqlstud...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm concerned that my bayes database may contain incorrect
information. I performed a search on all of the messages in the
quarantine, and pulled out the ones that contained BAYES_00 in their
score. There weren't all that
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:08:17 -0400, Alex mysqlstud...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm concerned that my bayes database may contain incorrect
information. I performed a search on all of the messages in the
quarantine, and pulled out the ones that contained BAYES_00 in their
score. There weren't all that
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:20:14 -0400, Alex mysqlstud...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Do you have Autolearn On?
Yes. Here is the bayes config from my local.cf:
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -0.9
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 16.0
bayes_expiry_max_db_size 100
I'm assuming you run a tad more messages than I, but on a quad with a
failover I have never seen the failover kick in 4 years. This is not
disputing your observations, just noting mine.
I claim absolutely no knowledge about the core processing/stacking
though I would assume (perhaps incorrectly)
was not altered in any fashion - just the usual size of incoming spam/mails
There are no AV [you mean Anti Virus right?] running on the machine
Would be back with results
--
Nigel Frankcom-2 wrote:
I'm assuming you run a tad more messages than I, but on a quad with a
failover I have never seen
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 03:30:59 -0700 (PDT), snowweb pe...@snowweb.co.uk
wrote:
I've just heard about sa-update and tried to run it. I was thinking of
setting up a cron to do it daily, however, I got the following error message
when I ran it manually:
[r...@s1 spamassassin]# sa-update service
Hi All,
I've written the following rule to deal with spam a particular set of
users are getting hit by that very few of my rules are hitting.
Using --lint the rule come back clean but on testing it appears to be
ignored. It's in the spamassassin directory.
Am I missing something stupid?
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:16:48 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann
guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:50 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Using --lint the rule come back clean but on testing it appears to be
ignored. It's in the spamassassin directory.
Am I missing something stupid
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:01:48 -0800 (PST), John Hardin
jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Testing was done through spamassassin --lint and with debug. I used a
mail that *should* have hit the rules.
--lint is not for testing rule performance, as it uses
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:00:47 -0800, Kelson kel...@speed.net wrote:
On the subject of style vs style type=text/css
*Technically* the TYPE attribute is required in HTML 4, but in practice,
no one really uses anything other than CSS, and most browsers will
assume it.
The current draft of HTML 5
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:51:13 +, Nigel Frankcom
ni...@blue-canoe.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is there are central point for links or dissemination of 'best
practice' rules?
I freely admit this is my 1st port of call.
I'm wondering if there is a simple (i.e works for a muppet like me)
page that lists
Hi All,
Is there are central point for links or dissemination of 'best
practice' rules?
I freely admit this is my 1st port of call.
I'm wondering if there is a simple (i.e works for a muppet like me)
page that lists details of how to synch non sa-update rules. The
question is based on the sad
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 21:05:52 +0300, JVlad d...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi,
Spamassassin 3.2 works very good for me. Now I want to write a plugin in
Perl that will be executed by spamassassin after each email is processed.
This script would have to know sender address, sender ip, and score
assigned by
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:12:47 +0300, JVlad d...@yandex.ru wrote:
sendmail + spamassassin milter (written by Georg C. F. et al)
everything works great so far, except I need to save the spamassassin
results (score+sender) and do this synchronously, right after the score
is calculated.
How
aside Does DynDNS allow SPF records?
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:08:38 +0100, Matthias Haegele
mhaeg...@linuxrocks.dyndns.org wrote:
Michelle Konzack schrieb:
Hello *,
since arrount 5 days I am hit by several 10.000 very small (~2 kByte)
messages which use my email addresse in From: and
A box is trained for a particular network need. For example a bank
would need aver different ruleset/bayes than a 'normal' user.
it's easy enough to create an image, however, that image will only
apply to the network is was trained for.
You can't shortcut training. It's an integral part of SA.
I haven't seen an update from sa-update in months. What version is
current?
I have dbg: dns: 5.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org = 709395, parsed as
709395 showing here.
This even after a dns crash and replace.
Nigel
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:39:11 +0100, Leveau Stanislas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 09:56:58 -0500, Jeff Mincy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:48:57 -0500
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
If I get a spam and I need to have SA learn that it's spam with
sa-learn, wouldn't it be useful to also
Ahh the joys of administration (paperwork)... lovely meetings, comfy
chairs, free coffee... some people just don't know when they are well
off! ;-D
Welcome back to the land of the living Justin.
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:40:11 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason)
wrote:
Hi all --
just a quick
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:07:58 -0700 (PDT), thadcoco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
My server CentOS 4, Sendmail, MailScanner (SA ClamAV) is being buried by
spoofed emails that are bounced back to my domain by the recipient's
servers. Virtually all these emails are being sent from a zombie at
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:10:53 -0400, Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see the following when running sa-update with debug flags:
[20528] dbg: conf: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended
that you configure trusted_networks manually
However:
# grep trusted
On Sat, 03 May 2008 12:51:32 -0300, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Guys,
im running SA 3.2.4 and, on the same machine, horde/imp as webmail
application.
Sometimes, mails sent through imp are getting flagged as SPAM
because of RBL checks, for example:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:29:34 +0100, jpff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has something happened to msrbl.com ? I have been using the Image
database with success for some time, but it seems to have vanished.
==John ffitch
Hi John, seems OK from here.
Checking for .ndb files
Updated: phish.ndb Wed
From the headers of all list emails
list-help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Post: mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org
List-Id: users.spamassassin.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org
oh and for VBounce look at the
Hi All,
A user received the spam below. The scoring on it seems very low. Does
it score consistently for others? If not, what rules is it tagging?
Any help gratefully received.
Received: by blue-canoe.org.uk (MTSPro MTSAgent 1.60.20) ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008
07:06:43 -
for redacted
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:18:03 +0530, Agnello George
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/20/08, Arvid Ephraim Picciani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nice. spam on the spamassassin ml. anyone got a rule for those already? :D
On Thursday 20 March 2008 11:13:09 agnello george wrote:
Hi,
I started your
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:40:33 +0100, Rocco Scappatura
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During last days I have noticed an increasing of 'rejected' messages.
I'm currently using 'zen.spamhaus.org' and 'list.dsbl.org' as reputation
servers.
At the same time, the number of false negative is growth.
I
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:59:58 -0500, Chris Santerre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2008-02-20 07:59
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Time to make multi.uribl.org optional rather
than default?
If you
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:43:37 -0700 (PPT), John D. Hardin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Duane Hill wrote:
But people don't read logs, or they would know... I'd suggest die-ing
instead.
Why not make it a configurable option in local.cf defaulting to
die. That way for those
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:27:41 -0500, Igor Chudov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was looking at this article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_spam
It claims that only five countries are hosting 99.68% of the global
spammer websites, of which the foremost is China, hosting 73.58% of
all web sites
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:07:17 -0700, Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't how one could determine the IP address associated with a URL in
the body of a message at the MTA level without accepting the message
first for further processing. The best you could do at the MTA level is
block
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:27:41 -0500, Igor Chudov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was looking at this article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_spam
It claims that only five countries are hosting 99.68% of the global
spammer websites, of which the foremost is China, hosting 73.58% of
all web sites
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:16:06 +0200, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Sterenborg wrote:
Steve Ingraham wrote:
I cannot help but comment on this post.
Neither can I.
I am one of those ignorant people that is subscribed to this list
(along with several others) for the purpose
I am amazed at the number of list users that unsubscribe from an anti
spam list and yet they fail to look at the headers of the mails they
receive
list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not sure what the message says though, I don't speak German :-)
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:15:31 +0200,
freundlichen Grüßen means yours sincerely.
At 04:33 AM 10/12/2007, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I am amazed at the number of list users that unsubscribe from an anti
spam list and yet they fail to look at the headers of the mails they
receive
list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not sure what
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:43:00 +0200 (CEST), Dag Wieers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Dag Wieers wrote:
That said, I wouldn't mind removing spfquery from one of the packages in
order to allow both packages to be co-installed. I
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:24:17 +0200, Alex Woick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
processing has ground down to really slow. I'm seeing
some incredibly long queries now in my slow-query log,
such as:
Try an optimize table tabname for each of the sa
tables. You just filled the database from scratch,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:59:26 +0400, Livitin Sergey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
unsubscribe
list-unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:07:32 -0700, Jeff Shepherd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My my - I criticize one of the noise makers by pointing out the
meta-troll's silliness so Marc responds by blacklisting me. This is
getting interesting in a psychological sense.
{^_-}I'm still giggling over
Don't feed the animals ?
I must have been dreaming when I saw the post about this and OT posts
(said he joining in an OT post)
On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 08:32:29 -0700 (PDT), Geno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I sent the email too soon. My apologies.
I'm not the owner of the server. My host uses
Redhat Linux Enterprise 3 and I'm trying to
install Spamassassin 3.2.3. I don't know much
about linux and I'm trying to install this for
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:33:04 -0700, Evan Platt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't see a header for a listowner contact.. I did see a 'help',
but not sure if that goes to a human or not.
I'm getting a OOO e-mail for every post to the list (yes, 3 so far,
this will make 4) from Tom Stockton. I
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:52:28 -0700, Evan Platt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:19 PM 8/12/2007, lynk wrote:
I'm totally confused re this spamassassin thingy... i can't seem to get MS
outlook to read the email i received (spam/ham) after spamassassin(3.1.9)
scanned the message.
You posted this 2
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:59:41 +0100, Martin.Hepworth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's huge 660KB for the attachments...
I'll dig out a place to drop it to..
I did wonder when the size trump card was gonna get played with SA. I
guess it's now. Here's hoping the folk at SANE can help - they've done
Hi All,
This morning I upgraded to 3.2.2 on CentOS 64 via yum.
I'm now getting a copy of all email headers inside the body of the
email.
Everything --lint's clean and apart from this it's working fine. As an
example I've copied in a list post below I received since the upgrade.
Any help or
in need of some advice.
If you look at the stuff below this bit you'll see pretty clearly the
problem I've got. If the dev's need to see raw messages (before SA
gets them, let me know)
TIA
Nigel
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:56:53 +0100, Nigel Frankcom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
This morning I
, it goes like this:
wget http://.../Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.2.tar.gz
tar xvfz Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.2.tar.gz
cd Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.2
[that patch command]
perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr
make
sudo make install
--j.
Nigel Frankcom writes:
Ahh - so I'm guessing I need to pull
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:04:23 +0800, Spamassassin List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Other than FuzzyOCR, is there other way to filter graphic spams? I had
ImageInfo but seem like it is not working.
regards
LC
ClamD with http://www.sanesecurity.co.uk/ work pretty well here.
Be sure and read
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:04:23 +0800, Spamassassin List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Other than FuzzyOCR, is there other way to filter graphic spams? I had
ImageInfo but seem like it is not working.
regards
LC
PS... also check out ImageInfo.pm
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm
Nigel
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:08:47 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which MTA are you using? The clamav plugin should reject the e-mail the
same way SA plugin does that (with much less CPU time spent)
On 22.07.07 15:32, Robert - eLists wrote:
Uhlar
... and I thought that
be imediately
rejected, the same way it's rejected when SA tells so.
On 23.07.07 10:19, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Umm, I may be missing the point here,
you seem to be :-)
but SA doesn't bounce mail, it just scores it.
however according to his informations, his qmail queue scanner rejects the
mail
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:03:23 -0400, Patrick Sherrill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone any Iron Port experiences they could share? We appear to be
losing a larger account to Iron Port and am curious regarding their No FP
claims.
Pat...
I'd personally be very dubious of anyone claiming no
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 02:22:40 -0500, Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Nigel Frankcom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quite apart from that, if Iron Port were so perfect, there wouldn't be
a SpamAssassin list?
Not quite sure I understand your comments. IronPort is one of many companies
that use
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:30:29 +0200, Oenus Tech Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there!
I've always had AWL disabled in my v310.pre file since sa 3.1.7. We
recently moved from 3.1.8 to 3.2.1. It still is commented out in the cf
file, but I'm getting AWL scores in messages. spamassassin -D
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been mentioned and I've missed it, but
I noted today that since upgrading from 3.2.0 to 3.2.1 bayes stopped
working, or rather, bayes started ignoring the username etc passed
from the local.cf.
Using bayes_sql_override_username has resolved the issue. My worry
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:13:24 -0500, Lindsay Haisley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 06:46 -0700, jdow wrote:
You will have to wait for up to a day for the Prolexic block to go
away.
I got blocked for checking out their anti-DDoS measures. The block went
away in about 15
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:30:25 +0100, --[ UxBoD ]-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Same here :(
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:28:51 -0400, Joe Zitnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it having troubles again? I'm having problems reaching the site.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:38:48 -0700, Jerry Durand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:30 AM, -- [ UxBoD ] -- wrote:
Same here :(
He announces a new, super dandy spam killing plugin and you think he
wouldn't get a DoS attack?
That's what happens when you do good work. :(
True
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:42:39 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:48:02 -0400, David Boltz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I?ve been getting the lint failures found below on my Rules Du Jour
updates for a few weeks now. Yes this would
Daryl is right, there is no fix due in 3.2.2 - I got the RDJ and the
sa-update errors confused. I guess maybe I should dye my hair blonde.
Apologies for any confusion I've caused.
Geez - blonde it is - it's sa-compile not sa-update!
I wonder if McDonalds have any jobs going :-/
Kind regards
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:48:02 -0400, David Boltz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I?ve been getting the lint failures found below on my Rules Du Jour
updates for a few weeks now. Yes this would be since the DDoS attacks
on rulesemporium. It looks like the same problem people have been
having with the
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:18:28 +0200, Matthias Haegele
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom schrieb:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:48:02 -0400, David Boltz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I?ve been getting the lint failures found below on my Rules Du Jour
updates for a few weeks now. Yes this would
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:01:46 +0200 (CEST), zbigniew szalbot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am new to SA but hope you will be able to guide me.
I have in my local.cf the following line:
add_header all Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_ tests=_TESTS_
autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:35:01 +0200 (CEST), zigniew szalbot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I tried to learn SA and used the following syntax:
sa-learn --spam -f /usr/home/zbyszek/june.txt
archive-iterator: unable to open Dear Valued Customer,: No such file
or directory
june.txt is a spam
S'cuse the top post but
If you're going to the trouble of tarball -- RPM, why not just do yum
install spamassassin?
KR
Nigel
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:11:14 -0500, Jonn R Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of SA? When you built SA from a tarball you did rpmbuild
-tb
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:07:52 -0400, Phil Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is anyone else getting these failed messages on their tripwire.cf updates?
I've been getting this message for several days now.
It looks to me like the new tripwire.cf is very broken.
-- Forwarded Message
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:30:00 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I've been getting the same for weeks. I ended up manually updating
rules; especially the stock one since more and more seem to be
slipping through.
The problems seemed to start after
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:38:03 +0200, Matthias Keller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 03:07:52 -0400, Phil Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is anyone else getting these failed messages on their tripwire.cf updates?
I've been getting this message
Hi All,
Whenever I run sa-compile I get the following...
body_0.xs: In function
`XS_Mail__SpamAssassin__CompiledRegexps__body_0_scan':
body_0.xs:43: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
body_0.xs:51: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
body_0.xs:59: warning: ISO
Hi All,
Apologies if this has been posted under another thread. If so can
someone point me to it?
As per recent instructions I'm running RDJ manually and getting this:
Lint output: [27805] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_adult.cf: html
[27805]
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:33:15 +0100, Randal, Phil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
www.rulesemporium.com isn't happy either :-(
Cheers,
Phil
Yeah - I got this earlier
The following rules had errors:
TripWire had an unknown error:
curl exit code: 7
curl: (7) couldn't connect
000
SARE Adult Content
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:11:11 -0400, D.J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all!
I've tried and tried, and can't get a rule I've handwritten to work.
Hopefully you all can help. I've got a user using Alltel's picture
messaging that keeps getting whacked every time he sends a message.
It consistently
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:26:59 +0200, arni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin W. Gagel schrieb:
I'm not able to get to www.rulesemporium.com, what's up there? Any one
know?
Do you read also or just write?
rulesemporium is under suspected DDOD. They have requested that all
users suspend
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:41:49 +0100, Nigel Frankcom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:26:59 +0200, arni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin W. Gagel schrieb:
I'm not able to get to www.rulesemporium.com, what's up there? Any one
know?
Do you read also or just write?
rulesemporium
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 20:07:20 +0200 (CEST), Raymond Dijkxhoorn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Anyone else having trouble getting to uribl ?
www not coming up. I hope we aren't seeing another anti-spam
casualty. :-(
I unplugged the server so I could play Forza 2 on the 360 at work. I'll plug
it
Hi All,
This may well have been covered before, if so my apologies and can
someone point me to the relevant thread.
Is there anything to be concerned about with this lot? In particular
the
body_0.xs:43: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
lines
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
Thanks Justin.
Been a tad manic here and I've not kept up with the lists lately.
Kind regards
Nigel
On Wed, 30 May 2007 19:02:58 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason)
wrote:
Nigel Frankcom writes:
Hi All,
This may well have been covered before, if so my apologies and can
someone
1 - 100 of 316 matches
Mail list logo
