Running the below command starting failing in the last couple days saying it
can't find updates.spamassassin.org DNS entry
/usr/bin/sa-update --nogpg --channel updates.spamassassin.org --channel
saupdates.openprotect.com
saupdates.openprotect.com is working fine though. Are we having a DNS
Sorry, should have been update instead of users in subject...
From: Gary W. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 7/24/2007 7:25 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: sa-update is failing on users.spamassassin.org
Running the below command starting
.updates.spamassassin.org
1.1.3.updates.spamassassin.org descriptive text 555165
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 07:34:44AM -0700, Gary W. Smith wrote:
Sorry, should have been update instead of users in subject...
From: Gary W. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 7/24
See the thread SA/Perl question that I asked on Saturday. It should be
in the archives. I did just what you are trying to do now (though I was
trying to do something different).
-Original Message-
From: Tom Allison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 3:11 AM
Hello,
I'm working on a perl script that will check some emails. I had a
question though (based on an earlier question). If SA is on a different
box how do I tell the perl code to use a different host and port?
Given something like the code below how do I specific a non-default
backend?
Never mind. I just realized that this module does the full SA
execution.
Mail::SpamAssassin:Client seems to work but is alpha. Any ideas on the
status of this?
Gary Wayne Smith
From: Gary W. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January
For the purposes of development, I would like to run 5+ separate copies
of spamd on the same host to test different settings. I would like to
be able to have a different config for each instance. It this possible?
More specifically, I would like to test different threshold levels,
different
More specifically, I would like to test different threshold levels,
different rule sets, tie some of the instances into lookup's, etc.
My
goal is to process each incoming email against each of these
instances
to see what the primary differences are.
It sounds more like you want to use
copies of spamd running
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 11:31:49AM -0800, Gary W. Smith wrote:
With that said, does anyone know how I would run 5 different copies
of
spamd on the same box?
Run on different ports w/ different startup parameters pointing at
different
config copies.
Better
, 2006 at 08:55:26PM -0800, Gary W. Smith wrote:
The image contained the OB stock ticker and the text was random, but
coherent sentences. What's the best course of action to block these
now. I'm running a couple rules from SARE. Are there some specific
ones that will help on this?
Use
I haven't been watching the list much lately so I apologize if this
topic has been kicked to death.
I've seen a sharp increase in our OB Ticker spam's that consist of an
image and some text. It passed the greylist just fine and was labeled
as bayes_00.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5
on the list turn into flame war asses?
I've been on this list prior to it being an apache list and it seems to
be degrading more and more.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 2:57 AM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: users
Title: mail bounce warning for the list
Was the SA group listed by spamcop last month? I just now received this for messages from October 26th.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
209.209.82.24 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [140.211.11.2] blocked
spelled wrong at the
time).
So this is a completely valid spam account. There's no grey area around
that one.
-Original Message-
From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:11 AM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Psst
, this whole story is also in the SA
archives...
-Original Message-
From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 11:27 AM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Psst!
Gary W. Smith wrote:
Jo, please read in entirety...
Sure.
Um
mentioned them as they were
on the top of my list of offenders spam on my end.
-Original Message-
From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 11:43 AM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Psst!
So how does Lending Tree come
list). I've been around this list for some years now so
this really isn't a noob scenario.
-Original Message-
From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 12:16 PM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Psst!
Gary W. Smith
In the past we have seen some slowness for bayes and AWL (mostly AWL).
We found after a couple million rows in AWL that the system starts
getting real slow. We setup a script to prune records that have a high
bayes threshold but a count of 1 (usually anonymous spammers). They
will not use that
as well.
-Original Message-
From: David Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 7:39 PM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: slow sql bayes store
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This has been seen on a variety of systems
Title: Bayes DB version issue 3.1.3 = 3.1.4
Hello,
I cant remember smoking crack when copying the config files over but anythings possible.
I built out a new machine today and installed SA. We have a list of CPAN modules that were installed (same list as from the 3.1.3 servers). I copied
This is because your database is in UTF8 format. As a result SA cannot
read it (though it can write it).
Drop the database and recreate it and the tables in latin and it will
work just fine. You will have to retrain after that though.
-Original Message-
From: Hamish Marson
|
+--+---+
| VERSION | 3 |
+--+---+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 12:38 AM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Bayes DB version issue 3.1.3 = 3.1.4
: Gary W. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:06 AM
To: Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Bayes DB version issue 3.1.3 = 3.1.4
Daryl,
Thanks for the info. I will update the .8. As for the database, which
is the primary concern, the user
(latin1_swedish_ci,IMPLICIT) and (utf8_general_ci,COERCIBLE) for
operation '='
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Gary Wayne Smith
-Original Message-
From: Gary W. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 8:06 AM
To: Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject
out two of my 4 other 3.1.3 and upgrade those in a couple days after it
has ran for a while.
Gary Wayne Smith
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 7:03 PM
To: Gary W. Smith
Subject: Re: RE: Bayes DB version issue 3.1.3 = 3.1.4
Ross,
You're not the only one to run into the problem. I had converted out
database over to UTF8 and didn't think anything about it until about a
week later when the spam started pouring in. It still seemed to learn,
it just couldn't select (i.e. compare).
I figured maybe it was the upgraded
Michael,
There are a couple ways of doing. It really depends on how easy you
want to make it for your users/admins. It also depends on your
configuration.
We use MySQL for bayes and awl. This make it easy for us as we have an
internal machine running Cyrus and SA. We have a local account
But isn't that that beauty of SA. You don't have to be a Linux guy to
install it.
-Original Message-
From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 7:35 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: For those who are considering a Barracuda Network Device
with for some
time.
-Original Message-
From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:05 PM
To: Marc Perkel
Cc: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: The Future of Email is SQL
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:50:03PM -0700, Marc Perkel
lock them into something. That's the
easiest way to drive them away from supporting it.
-Original Message-
From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:21 PM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: Marc Perkel; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: The Future
There are a few things that you can do a little differently. You can
return the status of the spam check as well as the marked up message.
Then just check if $? -ne 0 (or whatever logic you like).
This is what we do. In the event that the message is marked as a spam
we try to insert it into a
SORBS decided last week to list all of the IP's in my ISP's range as
Dailup. SORBS removed them without any problem but these IP's are
provisioned to my ISP from Level-3. They've done this twice in two
years now.
How do they decide to change the status of these IP's on a given day?
The IP's
On another paw, Craig, do consider who is the injured party. Marc is
not. The final recipient, the addressee, is an injured party for the
spam in her mailbox. The addressee's ISP is also an injured party due
to the (vastly) increased mail volume her servers must handle. They
have a tort
I got flak for top posting one day. I went over to the archives and
found out that I did not top post but apparently when he received the
email it was missing some header and it was miss filed in his email
client.
The person sent me two paragraphs of ranting about top posting... As
you did, I
Note sure if this will help.
/etc/syslog.conf:
local5.*;-/var/log/spamassassin
/etc/init.d/spamassassin:
daemon $NICELEVEL spamd -s local5 .other options.
This is on RHEL4.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Rick Measham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We use this as well for some stuff. We
purchased it because of the simplicity of implementation with postfix. In our
case its just another filter in the chain. Also, the overall price didnt
have sticker shock associated with it.
Postfix - Vexira - SA
From: Alejandro Lengua
How does ClamAV catch them if they cannot
unzip them? Or do they just assume they are a virus because its
protected? I believe you can set a rule up in Vexira that will block protected
zip files as well.
From:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006
Curtis,
It doesn't matter if the server name matches the domain name at all for
the domains that you are using. In fact, this is quite common in very
large installs (such as ISP's).
The only thing that is critically important is that each machine
involved in the processing of email have a
I second that.
-Original Message-
From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 8:29 PM
To: spam mailling list
Subject: Re: Internal email marked as spam...
Screaming Eagle wrote:
All,
Emailing with outlook and from internal network is marked
Now we get to watch the body part's fly across the room. :)
You know there are 3 things in life which you never ever talk about in
public; religion, politics and what OS is best.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Kather [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:24 AM
enough (ok, I'm
sucking
my
thumb right now, so I guess I'm out) to give the OP some good insight
into
our experiences.
Just my 2 (fill in the currency of your choice) :-)
Dimitri
On Friday April 07 2006 2:51 pm, Gary W. Smith wrote:
Now we get to watch the body part's fly across the room
I think this was covered in the archives
last year. My opinion is use the one that you are most comfortable with. I
personally use RedHat Enterprise, not because it better than the rest because
thats what I know.
I think that most of the headaches happen
around the MTA/MTUs rather than
Better question, what do you want to run? This might better help us
address the pros/cons.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ask List
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:54 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which Operating Systems Do
James,
Timeout is 600 seconds. If spamd doesn't have respond in that amount of
time them there is something else is wrong. I suppose that if all of
the spamd threads are clogged then you might find a waiting list but 600
seconds is a lifetime.
We had a misconfigured DNS once that slowed all
It appears that you are user per user bayes. If you have a large number
of users and performance is becoming an issue you might want to change
over to site wide bayes and disable per user.
As for user purging, no, there is no user detection to process users
that are no longer in the system.
We use AWL via SQL. We wrote a script that will prune certain records
from the database weekly to keep AWL small. Basically we delete any
entries with a positive score and a count of 1 (as these are mostly
randomly generated addresses that will never happen again).
-Original Message-
It shouldn't be a problem as long as the outgoing SMTP host has a valid
domain name and the machine name also resolves. So if the machine name
is blah.yourdomain.com you should still have an A record for it in
your DNS. Without it many mail applications will reject the email at
the MTA level (I
We use a MySQL backend (partly because we have multiple front end
servers). This has worked well as we have a cronjob that runs a script
and purges several awl entries that fall into a certain criteria. This
works well to keep the database small, tidy and fast.
Gary Wayne Smith
-Original
I do as well. I usually take the RH SRPM, replace the source file, update the
spec and then build. In most cases, it's up to date.
In the case of SA I just use CPAN. It seems to work well for our organization.
Gary Wayne Smith
-Original Message-
From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL
Shane,
We use Vexira from centralcommand.com for
our own company mail. It seems to work fairly well and isnt that tricky
to setup. We had a bear of a time getting amavisd working with postfix a
couple years back so we decided to go commercial.
Gary Wayne Smith
From:
PM, Gary W. Smith wrote:
We use Vexira from centralcommand.com
for our own company mail. It seems to work fairly well and isnt that
tricky to setup. We had a bear of a time getting amavisd working with
postfix a couple years back so we decided to go commercial.
heh
John,
I think the group is of the opinion that these commercial apps aren't
anything more than glorified SA installs with a huge price tag. Huge
being more than the cost of a good SA box plus your time...
We just recently upgraded our Dell 4600's to Dell 5150's (4 of them) for
under $3000.
John,
I saw several at Linux world but I think that the biggest problem is
that each one will require care and feeding when the day is done. The
only difference is they provide and instant on facility whereas you will
need to configure you're from scratch (which equates to an extra 30
minutes or
Rob,
I'm not an attorney so this isn't real legal advice but what are False
Sp*am accusations. Block them for being a Spammer not a Sp*ammer. I
highly doubt that even in the remote possibility that this was opted
into that they could even remotely take any legal action against you.
You should
DBM is fine for small installations but if you need to scale up then SQL
will allow for a consolidate database across multiple machine.
We use it on a decent size platform (multiple front end relays, multiple
sa boxes and a clustered MySQL instance). It works well for us.
For bayes training, we
Philip,
From what I have read, people have given you complete and logic advice
on how to do this properly. Yeah, the US has laws regarding SPAM. They
also have laws on drinking and driving. Law's are reactive. But, if
you wish to forego the advice of list members then you should probably
Craploads... They are scoring .2 under my threshold. But I haven't seen
any decrease in the level. I was meaning to train these into bayes...
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.8 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SBL,URIBL_SBL
autolearn=no version=3.1.0
-Original
Title: [OT] Paypal scam emails
Hello,
I received a typical paypal email today and wanted to ask this question of the group before looking too deep into the matter. I normally get at least one a day in my personal account. This is normal. Two weeks ago I setup a new account for purchasing
the probably is of being randomly
spammed over that of someone in the company selling a list.
-Original Message-
From: List Mail User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Tony,
One thing that you need to keep in mind with the question as well. All
distro's are thoroughly tested and sometimes custom compiled. That
isn't necessarily bad but it means that whatever you get out of the box
isn't new. As mentioned you can go with bleeding edge (opensuse,
fedora, etc)
, November 09, 2005 1:54 AM
To: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?
Our production database for a large number of emails (but using
site
wide) is about 40mb.
What is your bayes_expiry_max_db_size set to? Do you feel that it
has
been
You're right, my guy gave me the size of bayes + awl. The real number
is 14.5mb. (with an overhead of 3.2mb).
-Original Message-
From: Gary W. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 9:00 AM
To: email builder; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: HUGE
I'd also through www.linux-ha.org into the mix. We use that to manage
the cluster for the SA database and use DRBD for the filesystem. We
also use the same concept backend email stores as well.
It's more open source to complement this open source.
-Original Message-
From: Michael
Default.
Gart
-Original Message-
From: email builder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 8:58 PM
To: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?
Our production database for a large number of emails (but using
To: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?
Our production database for a large number of emails (but using site
wide) is about 40mb.
What is your bayes_expiry_max_db_size set to? Do you feel that it has
been
enough to effectively
Just my $0.02 but if it's in MySQL then you really don't need to expire
each one. You can write a custom script that will do this. When you
break it down, expire is really just finding those tokens that are
beyond the threshold where id=x and time=y. The resultant would be
where time=x.
But
We run a linux-ha cluster. Works out well.
-Original Message-
From: email builder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 6:51 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: HUGE bayes DB (non-sitewide) advice?
From what I understand, MySQL cluster design is
You are thinking to hard on this problem.
You create a MySQL cluster and point local.cf to that. Restart SA and
it works. If you pull the plug on the first clustered node the other
one will automatically take over. That's the purpose of the cluster...
automating the failover.
host files,
Marc,
Simple, create a MySQL cluster using two servers. I would recommend
using Linux HA with DRBD for the database. This is simple enough to
configure.
Then point all of your servers to that cluster. We have 4 SA daemon
servers pointed to one of these clusters. Unless you don't configure
Title: AWL maintenance...
I just though Id share this with everyone.
I noticed that our backend MySQL data instance was running a little slow recently with more of a load on it. This instance is shared between 4 front end servers so I figured maybe we were getting a little more of a load.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 9:39 AM
To: Dean Baldwin
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: NFS and SA/Bayes DB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dean Baldwin writes:
Hi,
I
You mentioned firewall. Is it possible that you are not opening up the
right connections to localhost or to the 192.x.x.x machine?
We tend to mix firewall and server software on the same machine from
many small small clients. I'm assuming that you are using iptables.
Did you open up lo for
of getting the proper information for resolv.conf.
HTH,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:16 AM
To: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Net::DNS install assistance
I'm running firestarter, I have
If it's just one of the test that's failing then you might just want to
try installing it anyways. It could be that the particular test is
buggy.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 2:32 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
I have seen this before as well. I think that it assumes that the
process is dead after it tries to kill and but in reality it's not
because it's still processing an email. I put a sleep 10 in right after
the $RETVAL=$? in the SA init script.
I think the reason is that the init script tries to
How do you (make and) balance the calls to the AV servers? How do you
(make
and) balance the calls to the spamd machines? I am very interested in
these
details!
We just call them in order case on the connection line. On two of the 4
SMTP gateways we use node 1 as the primary and node
PM
To: Jason Frisvold
Cc: Gary W. Smith; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Load balancing spamd
--- Jason Frisvold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/05, email builder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if I had forgotten the -A, I think I would have been seeing
connection
Do you happen to have any firewall rules in place on the LVS instance?
Have you specified which IP's are allowed to access the instance?
Both of the above are what I ran into on the default RH build (even
though I don't run LVS).
spamd -s local5 -d -c -m10 -H -A 10.0.8.0/21
I believe without
I second.
HSA (Historical Score Averager) might be reasonably accurate,
but unless
you think about the math, it's purpose isn't clear. (And in my
experience, most people don't enjoy thinking about math. )
Got any better suggestions for a name?
Average Scoring System or ASS :)
--Chris
Since 3.0.1 we have had great success with SA and MySQL. In production
we have a decent MySQL server serving two separate Servers running SA
which in turn are used by 4 frond end relays.
All in all I think it's a good solution if you need a central database
shared between multiple instances. It
spamassassinpass
-Original Message-
From: alan premselaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 6:12 PM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SQL install with mSQL driver
Gary,
I'm not a database expert by any means, but I've done a bit
the instance to
production and used a bogus username and it created it in the bayes_vars
database. I'll need to check into why the database isn't cooperating.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Michael Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:10 PM
To: Gary W. Smith
-
From: Michael Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:10 PM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SQL install with mSQL driver
This is a pretty good indication that you did not use the supplied
bayes_mysql.sql file to create your database
Title: SQL install with mSQL driver
Hello,
Im using 3.0.x on RHEL 3 right now in our production environment and was looking at setting up a new test environment. We use MySQL for the common bayes DB which is working well for us in production.
Today I tried installing the same packages for
Using a script and a crontab. That's about as automatic as you can get.
For example, we have several account aliases that we have intentionally
signed up on the remove lists and they all end up in a user account
called spam. There will never be any legitimate email going to this
account. So
And what is the dummy record? If it's not valid (i.e. and unroutable IP
such as the 10,192, 172 blocks, then it might get routed back to the
client's internal network. If it's a public IP it can be worse. Say
you route it to a dummy IP owned by you and there isn't anything on
there and one day
I've used a different approach,
IN MX 10 primary.domain.com (4 machines)
IN MX 20 primary1.domain.com (2 of those 4)
IN MX 30 primary1.domain.com (the other 2 of those 4)
IN MX 20 backup.domain.com
IN MX 30 primary.domain.com
Seems to force most of the spam through the primary. Very little
The problem is that when they forward the email you will loose the
headers and it will think they are the spam/hammers.
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 3:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sa-learn help
I am running a Directadmin
Title: Spamd stops responding...???
Sure it could. How many
spamd processes do you have running? How much time is each taking?
What do your custom rulesets look like? What's the CPU speed? These
are all factors. If you have a bunch of machines hitting the same box and
there are a bunch
No really as it was marked at spam to being with. It only scored 9.1
because of AWL...
* -20 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Are you trying to skew my bayes or something :).
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28,
, but
ended up in myinbox. I am running amavisd-new with Postfix, how do I tell
ifspamassassin is even working?Gary W. Smith
wrote:You might want to collect some additional information from the
clientsuch as the headers. This is where I would
start.Gary-Original
Message-From: Robert
You might want to collect some additional information from the client
such as the headers. This is where I would start.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:54 AM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Porno
I have
Title: No subject header then no tag rewrite
I have been getting a couple blank emails lately and looking into the headers I find that its clearly marked as spam but the subject hasnt been rewritten because it doesnt exist in the header. Is there a way to force SA to put a subject header in
Title: RE: spamassassin + filter.sh
If the call to spamd fails
then the message is passed back. Basically if it fails it just isn't
scanned.
But there usually aren'y many problems with
SA. Many of us are running it on high volume systems in complex
configurations with no problems.
Gary
Title: Problem installing SpamAssassin 3.0.2
New host?
Your ISP shouldn't have any problems
installing modules like that.
Gary
From: Geoff Soper
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sat 1/1/2005 10:50
AMTo: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Problem
installing SpamAssassin 3.0.2
I run
-Original Message-
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 9:16 AM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: Jerry Bell; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Interesting NW article
Gary W. Smith wrote:
The article mentions that they reached out to the SA
-Original Message-
From: Joel M Snyder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 10:26 AM
To: Gary W. Smith
Cc: Joel M Snyder; Keith Shaw
Subject: Re: reach out to the SA community
Gary:
OK. What we need to do is figure out how to handle the 'tool-based'
approach
Ironically, that's one thing that Joel said in his email (regarding some
of the venders using SA).
It's got to be said. Dude, tell your management that they are stupid
and if they still need help we can offer the clueX4 to assist in their
learning...
This was just referenced only 7 emails
Its in the archives. Check the
permissions on the /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_* files to ensure that the user
trying to issue the update (in my case, its filter) has access to the
file. If you do an sa-learn as root or another use then the files will be
created and locked un their
Looks like the first attempts at some phishing. The domain name and
everything look like NCR BUT the DNS servers are NCRWEBHOST.COM with
what looks like a bogus email address for admin contract.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Michael Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday,
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
