From: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com.INVALID
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users
@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Wow! That was fast! Thank you :)
Building now...
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-11 9:01 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu
You need to leave something for the rest of us to contribute :)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon
:)
From: Jean-Louis Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list and
probably another one for source code.
--
Jean
; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
...@yahoo.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
should be ok now
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com
Monteiro jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Not sure it's the only reason. Romain has a daemon for mailing list
and
probably another one for source code.
--
Jean-Louis
, 2014 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love
It does yes
Le 4 déc. 2014 19:30, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
There is only one failing bug with transactions in
CloudBees.javaee7-samples.
Do you think that the most usual usecase with @Transactional would work now
with Tomee 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT ?
--
View this message in context:
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job/javaee7-samples-tomee-2.0/4/org.javaee7.jaxrs$jaxrs-client/console
expected:[{[name:Penny,age:1},{name:Leonard,age:2},{name:Sheldon,age:3]}]
but
was:[{[age:1,name:Penny},{age:2,name:Leonard},{age:3,name:Sheldon]}]
Romain
about @Transactional can be linked to the test:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=blob;f=container/openejb-core/src/test/java/org/apache/openejb/cdi/transactional/TransactionScopeTest.java;h=d7f27c072ca1e4e99e418794b238dc7f3e0a871e;hb=ae8f512c5655dfd9024353c5a46340c6de07edf3
Yeah we need to do something about it :)
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
hehe love this error:
https://javaee-support.ci.cloudbees.com/job
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want to use
tomee-remote with plus classifier configured):
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.batchee/groupId
the description it's optional.
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi
Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one is easier to dev
the description it's optional.
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi
Will not be enough cause of descriptor part but this one
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these
particular tests but hopefully it will
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https
radcor...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
pushed few things about it this morning, not sure it will help these
particular tests but hopefully it will
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http
Thanks! I'll have a look.
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@tomitribe.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
On CDI entry points are:
1
; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi David,
Thanks for a warm welcome :)
The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the
Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi David,
Thanks for a warm welcome :)
The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the
Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable. They are
looking into it.
Cheers
users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Hi David,
Thanks for a warm welcome :)
The samples are setup with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT already. We were using the
Cloudbees - Jenkins FOSS, but for some reason it's unavailable
Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com; users@tomee.apache.org
users@tomee.apache.org
Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
@tomee.apache.org
Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users
:42 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com
Cc: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
Sent
, November 5, 2014 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Yeah give me a sec, the job was taking too much space
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; Roberto Cortez
radcor...@yahoo.com
Cc: David Blevins david.blev
: users@tomee.apache.org users@tomee.apache.org; David Blevins
david.blev...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
seems tomee embedded profile misses at least (tomee-embedded doesn't
provide it by default, tomee-plus should if you want
On Nov 2, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hibernate is just not apache compliant, im not for eclipselink since it
usage and behavior is error prone and harder to control + id like to stay
apache.
Well stay openjpa i think.
Btw this kind of discussion is
Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com
...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support
8:41 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
travis I guess?
https://travis-ci.org/javaee-samples/javaee7-samples/jobs/39782388
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-03 9:24 GMT+01:00 David
; Roberto Cortez radcor...@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
First -- welcome, Roberto! Great to see you on the list :)
We should definitely try with TomEE 2.0-SNAPSHOT. Would be great to track
these. What CI are you using? We could
Hi David
Thanks for the useful info about IBM decision on switching form OpenJPA to
Eclipselink from JPA 2.1. I think that's exactly the point.
I myself also prefer OpenJPA, but I can understand why IBM wants to stick
with eclipselink from now on.
[]
Leo
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:13 AM, David
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-td7584157.html
It looks like the JPA provider wouldn't be ready for Tomee@JavaEE 7.0.
I guess the Hibernate
...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com a écrit :
See this discussion in the mailing list of OpenJPA:
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when
, but it will be there.
Anyway, I hope this is useful information and count me in to help :)
Cheers,Roberto
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: users@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: TomEE plans for Java EE 7
Le 2 nov. 2014 20:16, tibor17 tibo
Hi Jesse,
Maybe you could contribute that to the project?
You just need to create a root JIRA for Java EE 7 and add some subtask to
it.
Would be great.
I can also create a page so that you can contribute a page on the website.
Up to you.
2013/6/3 jieryn jie...@gmail.com
Greetings,
On
Will be probably hard to get a JMS 2.0 compliant release from ActiveMQ. It
may require additional work to switch to Apollo as it looks to be the
product to rely on.
JLouis
2013/6/3 David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:04 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, nice response David. A nice list that show impact and new/target
versions and even mention of the time line.
On Jun 3, 2013 12:36 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 1, 2013, at 3:04 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
I think realistically you need all
Greetings,
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:36 AM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
Exactly. We need all these projects to complete their portion of JavaEE 7:
- CDI 1.1 - Apache OpenWebBeans
- EJB 3.2 - Apache OpenEJB
- JPA 2.1 - Apache OpenJPA
- JSF 2.2 - Apache MyFaces
- Servlet
Let me play of the bet game and say jaxrs will be the fastest ;). It is
almost already in the box and the easier to integrate (thks cxf).
All projects are not linked excepted tomcat and websockets where we have to
work at tomee level and not openejb. That s why i see it as the first step
in our
Tomee is tomcat so we need at least a tomcat 8 release
Le 1 juin 2013 05:13, Howard W. Smith, Jr. smithh032...@gmail.com a
écrit :
Of course, I saw the following blog post:
Introducing Java EE 7: June 12 Kickoff[1]
I think I heard some chatter about Java EE 7 on this list sometime
recently,
Understood, thanks Romain and John!
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Once tomcat is here we can branch, before dont even think of it
Le 1 juin 2013 12:04, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com a écrit :
I think realistically you need all of the
Can't wait for JSR 352 Batch Applications for the Java Platform. Looks very
much like spring batch which i have used and thought was one of the best
spring modules that had no equivalent in jee.
--
View this message in context:
47 matches
Mail list logo
