Hi,
td width=284 align=center class=welcomeBox
¡¡ Welcome label wicket:id=userName/label
Could it be, that label is not supported as markup for a Label component
and that you should use something like instead ?
... roland
--
View this message in context:
Thank you for your help! But the major problem is The Label Is Not at the same
level as the form , the Label is deep inside those table tags. Is there any
solution to this kind of problem.
Thanks again~
Kevin Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a html page that displays welcome
,XXX ,or
It is absurd. You can deploy your web application wherever you want.
Thanks for explaining the most esoteric aspect of web applications. Perhaps
no one knew it so far :-) . Well, it's not your fault either since this
thread has grown out of proportions, and it's not easy to read all message.
No, it did not work for me using ajax. Until I added one of the
solutions described.
Should I provide a quickstart?
regards Nino
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
as far as i know Image works just fine with ajax. if you want an image that
is not cached use NonCachingImage.
-igor
On 9/9/07, Nino
I'm not a Wicket core developer guru, but I'm leading a big Wicket based
project in Rome.
I would pleased to attend Cocoon conference and bring my Wicket experience.
Paolo Di Tommaso
On 9/9/07, Grzegorz Kossakowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Wicket devs and users!
On behalf of Cocoon
I know(and agree), but I just feel that we should somehow warn people
that image won't work with ajax?
regards Nino
Matej Knopp wrote:
Again, try using NonCachingImage instead of Image. I does exacly what
the suggested fix does. I just overlooked it.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Nino Saturnino
Hi,
According to the javadoc Form.updateFormComponentModels should update
all the models of all FormComponents in a form (without validation
presumably?). This sets all the model objects to the convertedInput
value (in FormComponent.updateModel), unfortunately convertedInput is
only set
Hi,
Wicketstuff dojo has just been modified in order to build its artifact
on the same location as usually :
http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicketstuff-dojo
Cheers
--
Vincent
Maurice Marrink wrote:
Johan recently made some changes to the wicket-stuff repository
I was one of two people who built kronos, but i have to say that i haven't
worked on it for quite a while, because of time issues, so the dependency is
most likely out of date.
Ted
2007/9/8, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ted, who build kronos, is on vacation and I'm not sure if he is
On 9/10/07, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Off-topic: Why are so much methods marked final? This might prevent
API-misuse but also prevents innovative _use_! I can understand you want
framework users to do it the wicket way, because they will probably only
spam the users list with
hi thomas,
http://www.syntevo.com
If somebody finds a problem, please let me know.
looks nice. :-) only thing you should consider is to open external links in a
new browser window (so your site stays available).
regards, --- jan.
Congratulations!
You might want to set setStripWicketTags to true though.
Martijn
On 9/10/07, Thomas Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to let you know, that our Wicket-based website gone on-line:
http://www.syntevo.com
If somebody finds a problem, please let me know.
We
No, LABEL is a valid HTML element for a Label component (it would be
pretty twisted if it wasn't ;)). Besides, if a tag check was failing,
the error message would say so.
But keep the guesses coming. That's all I've been able to for Kevin
so far...
-Ryan
On Sep 10, 2007, at 12:00 AM,
invocation count 1??
So you only do 1 request and you profile that?
thats not a good test. You have to do plenty and multiply on the same time
(10 for 100 request or something like that)
to really see the difference. (and have a warm up phase)
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL
On Sep 10, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Jan Kriesten wrote:
looks nice. :-) only thing you should consider is to open external
links in a
new browser window (so your site stays available).
regards, --- jan.
Gah! I thought opening new windows for external links went out with
the blink tag ;)
that looks very strange to me. We have also a very large app here and we
dont notice a difference
So i am very curious what is happening at your place then. Are you sure for
example that the pages
are serializable ? That we don't have constantly exceptions?
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean
you should call invalidate() anyway instead of invalidateNow()
there could maybe be usecases where you should call the invalidateNow() for
example if you want to invalidate
the current http session and make in the same request a new one (if that is
possible??)
But you should do invalidate()
Maurice Marrink wrote:
@vincent
Hmm, looks like you are generating unique id's for your snapshots. I
don't think that is wise as the server will run out of disk space like
that in no time. You should put uniqueVersionfalse/uniqueVersion
inside the snapshotRepository tag.
Tnx Maurice,
I
Here is the constructor of the class i have:
public CategoryBrowser(final PageParameters parameters) {
// Add the simplest type of label
add(new Label(message, Welcome to the Category Browser Page));
System.out.println(Param = + parameters.getString(id) );
}
tried https://lilo:8443/whisky/app/cat/id/1 ?
you might want to have a look at QueryStringUrlCodingStrategy
On 9/10/07, chickabee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the constructor of the class i have:
public CategoryBrowser(final PageParameters parameters) {
// Add the simplest
yes please change this because else i can keep on deleting constantly stuff
:(
On 9/10/07, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@vincent
Hmm, looks like you are generating unique id's for your snapshots. I
don't think that is wise as the server will run out of disk space like
that in no
Johan Compagner wrote:
On 9/10/07, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
According to the javadoc Form.updateFormComponentModels should update
all the models of all FormComponents in a form (without validation
presumably?). This sets all the model objects to the convertedInput
Simply Amazing! It works like a charm.
So the Wicket syntx is:
https://lilo:8443/whisky/app/cat/param1/value1/param2/value2
Gracias para la ayuda Fancis!
=
tried https://lilo:8443/whisky/app/cat/id/1 ?
--
View this message in context:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 9/10/07, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Off-topic: Why are so much methods marked final? This might prevent
API-misuse but also prevents innovative _use_! I can understand you want
framework users to do it the wicket way, because they will probably only
that is the default, you can changed it using a different UrlCodingStrategy
On 9/10/07, chickabee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simply Amazing! It works like a charm.
So the Wicket syntx is:
https://lilo:8443/whisky/app/cat/param1/value1/param2/value2
Gracias para la ayuda Fancis!
Thanks again, and what will be the best way to make these url temper proof?
Currently, if i break the key value pairs, the wicket app is very unhappy
like below:
Unexpected RuntimeException
Root cause:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: URL fragment has unmatched key/value pair:
name/foo/id
at
no it is not! - its just 1 way the wicket syntax may be - you should
look at mount and the existing coding-strategys as well as (if youre on
1.3 already) on the new HybridUrlCodingStrategy
you can have fllowing URL flavors out of box:
/app/page/value1/value2
(IndexedURLCoding)
/app/page:0
Indeed, it is a very big component hierarchy (It contains at least 3 levels
of nested AjaxTabbedPanel components).
The application is, in fact, a single page and it uses a lot of ajax to
perform the updates. The model reflect the component hierarchy (Appliction
has a single modelObject which
I believe the
org.apache.wicket.request.target.coding.AbstractRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy.decodeParameters(),
shold not throw a RunTime Exception as it does now, if the url is tampered,
instead it should always provide the parameters and values to it's best
guess and then let the user decided
severian wrote:
The available list should include the full set I think, not just those
that are not currently selected.
Severian.
I've tried this. It doesn't help
-
final Form pupilForm = new PupilForm(pupilForm);
String first
On 9/10/07, chickabee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These strategies are pretty nice, but the question remains why the
decoder()
method pukes out when there is mismatch of key value pairs. Hacker will be
very happy with the current state of implementation.
only if you deploy your application in
Matej, how can I say to my model to serialize some objects and to not others?
If I would detach the entire mode, that would mean that the next ajax
request would require again to call the (very costly) service and this is
not acceptable.
Alex.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
There seems to be
You can make the reference transient. So it would no be serialized,
bit it would be kept in memory as long as the page is the last
accessed one. And if it eventually becomes null (when you e.g go to
another page and return back), you can reinject it. Or you can just
store it to session (outside
Turn on SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, and use FilePageStore as
IPageStore (specified in session store constructor). Then go to your
tmp dir and you should be able to find the serialized pages there.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I figure it out?
Johan
Hello everyone!
I've got a problem using component Palette from Wicket-Extensions-1.2.6. The
code I use to add Palette on a Form is cited below:
---
final Form pupilForm = new PupilForm(pupilForm);
ListString available = new
On Monday, September 10, 2007, 12:23:36 PM, chickabee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still do not see why the wicket should treat it as an internal error if
there are missing parameters? I guess wicket needs to follow the same
paradigm as in the raw HttpRequest, let the user pull the parameters if
only if you deploy your application in development mode. in deployment mode
only the internal error page.
see IApplicationSettings#setInternalErrorPage(Class)
gerolf
Thanks for the good piece of info.
I still do not see why the wicket should treat it as an internal error if
there are missing
It is about 32MB. Kind a big page :)
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Turn on SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, and use FilePageStore as
IPageStore (specified in session store constructor). Then go to your
tmp dir and you should be able to find the serialized pages there.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Alex
Yes you are right.
I guess the the name u were looking for is:
org.apache.wicket.request.target.coding.MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy
These strategies are pretty nice, but the question remains why the decoder()
method pukes out when there is mismatch of key value pairs. Hacker will be
very happy
I would disagree because this is the first problem any web developer would
like to address, what happens if their urls are being tempered manually, it
should not result into any kind of error by the web framework, rather this
is the application validation issue and to be handled by the
Indeed, making the reference transient improves the responsiveness even with
the SecondSessionLevelStore. Anyway, I am curious, what is your advice for
this kind of applications? Keep using HttpSessionStore or switch to
SecondLevelSessionStore and make the most big objects transient? What is the
Pardon? All that's doing is showing their custom error page, exactly
as the other replies have suggested that you'd want to do with Wicket
- I'd be more impressed if it had shown an index of the news for that
date, but as it is, that's just what you can easily do with Wicket.
All you need to do
sigh Ok, thanks for the help on this. My objective was to be able to have
a structure of HTML and resource dependencies (css, js, img, etc) that could
be easily edited in an HTML editor such that the editor doesn't have
problems resolving the resources and such that Wicket doesn't have problems
Ok, let me give you a different scenario and see if wicket has a way to
handle it.
Assume there are 10 parameters are being passed to the app as below:
http://some.web.site/wicket/app/page/p1/v1/p2/v2/p3/v3/...p9/v9/p10/v10
Now If I mess-up the key value pair at the end like:
you got to be kidding me...32MB
really? Or is this a nice joke so in the middle of the day :)
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is about 32MB. Kind a big page :)
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Turn on SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, and use FilePageStore as
:) Unfortunately it's not a joke, but I'm glad you're having fun :D.
Actually, this is result of worst case scenario simulation (I told you that
there are heavy objects in the model). After making transient some of the
fields, the size of the page dropped dramatically.
Alex.
Johan Compagner
Perhaps template inheritance can help you here. I have a 'base' page
that contains the HTML head tag that all my pages use. For example I
have a Basepage.html:
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org/;
head
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css
The only caveat you'll have is whether or not the backbutton is
supported long enough, and how many copies of that page you want to
have in memory.
If the non-2nd level cache way works for you, then there is absolutely
nobody telling you to stop using it. The difference has mostly to do
with
You write your own coding strategy, using the existing ones as
guidelines/templates - I've not got any example code as supporting
free-format user-created URL's isn't a scenario that's been relevant
in the applications I've done.
Wicket provides a number of strategies, but the fundamental point
It is a intranet application, so the number of users for this application is
at most ~30-40 users/day. A back button support is not needed, because there
is a single page and also it doesn't make sense (since it is all ajax).
I'm still wondering, what is best in this case:
* Using
Thanks Gwyn for all the clarifications and patience, I believe I have all the
answers now.
Also, what's your take on adding an iterator to PageParameters that will
help in looping over the parameters, rather than pulling them one at at time
the way it is right now. I'm not sure if the same can
if you just have 1 page with no back button support/all ajax
then httpsessionstore is fine
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a intranet application, so the number of users for this application
is
at most ~30-40 users/day. A back button support is not needed,
Johan, Matej, Martijn,
thank you all for help!
PS: one more reason to love this community :)
Johan Compagner wrote:
if you just have 1 page with no back button support/all ajax
then httpsessionstore is fine
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a
you mean when you add Image using ajax it doesnt show up?
being able to refresh something and it not working are two very different
things. if you have a nonversioned page and Image in it you will have the
exact same behavior because the url will remain stable - does that mean
Image is broken in
Thanks for the reply.
Where are your css resources located under this configuration? I have a
similar setup. I have a BasePage.html that refers to the css:
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=UTF-8 /
!-- Stylesheets --
link
and one more advice, for you and people reading about this. if you have
large data like that that you want cached because retrieving it is slow, i
would use an external cache. caching it in wicket-models is not the right
place imho because as you can see wicket sometimes needs to serialize/clone
google pngfix for explorer
-igor
On 9/10/07, Anthony J Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Along these lines I haven't managed to get images with transparency to
display properly. My PNGs all display black instead of transparent pixels
:(.
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: Igor
If I remember correctly (this was a while back) it doesn't work over firefox
either...
I'll check up on the link.
Thanks
Anthony
- Original Message -
From: Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: Image from DB
The extra memory for the ClickListener is negligible and does give you
more flexibility because now you can have more than one interested party
for the link click. My use case (fetch nested component, add listener)
was already answered sufficiently by Martijn (bad OO, components should
and also keep the ui state down to a minimum - which will make your app
clusterable and thus scalable for the future.
the app is clusterable it could serialize it just fine ;)
32MB and everything is serializeable thats an accomplishment!
johan
convertvalue() isn't called for a datefield i think...
because i think the type is set (to Date) and then the converter is called:
convertedInput = converter.convertToObject(getInput(), getLocale());
so i don't think it will be trimmed...
johan
On 9/7/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote:
The extra memory for the ClickListener is negligible and does give you
more flexibility because now you can have more than one interested party
for the link click. My use case (fetch nested component, add listener)
was already answered sufficiently by Martijn (bad OO,
Thanks Rüdiger. I'm trying the wicket:remove method now. Very clever.
Do you know of any links to documentation or examples on how to use the
live method for css, js, and image resources?
--
Jason
Rüdiger_Schulz wrote:
Another tipp on this topic:
You could provide the CSS twice. Once
wheleph wrote:
Hello everyone!
I've got a problem using component Palette from Wicket-Extensions-1.2.6. The
code I use to add Palette on a Form is cited below:
---
final Form pupilForm = new PupilForm(pupilForm);
ListString available
Hi,
I don't know the best way but we just created error404.html which
forwards to the home page. Notice that several lines of dots - they make
the response bigger than 512Kb, so IE doesn't show it's friendly 404
page. Please share your expirience if you have a better way to handle it :-)
The issue is present in both IE and Firefox (flash visible at all times), the
difference is that on IE the flash object is clickable the whole time
whereas in Firefox becomes clickable only when I move the popup away from
the flash content.
I'll try the invisibility solution if nothing else is
On 9/10/07, Andrew Klochkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the response bigger than 512Kb, so IE doesn't show it's friendly 404
I hope I don't have to download half a meg to find out my original
request couldn't be found ;)
But yes, you need to do some special processing to make the page
bigger than
this is already fixed in trunk
-igor
On 9/10/07, Kent Tong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Liu-4 wrote:
Unable to find component with id 'userName' in [MarkupContainer
[Component id = _relative_path_prefix_14, page =
com.cmip.web.pages.TopFrame, path =
http://herebebeasties.com/2006-12-20/using-a-servlet-filter-for-404-error-page/
-igor
On 9/9/07, chickabee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
What is the preferred strategy for customization of error page under HTTP
404 - File not found situations, any helpful pointer will be
Thanks for the reply! When I have some extra time, I'll mess around
with it more.
Tauren
On 9/10/07, Ted Roeloffzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was one of two people who built kronos, but i have to say that i haven't
worked on it for quite a while, because of time issues, so the dependency
Hi!
I'd like to write a signIn page, that let me STAY LOGGED IN (/always
signed in/etc.). This way the session won't be closed when I close the
browser. The only way to invalidate the session is to log out (or many
days have to pass). I think I should use session cookies, and I should
set the
in web.xml
-igor
On 9/10/07, Zsolt Süli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to write a signIn page, that let me STAY LOGGED IN (/always
signed in/etc.). This way the session won't be closed when I close the
browser. The only way to invalidate the session is to log out (or many
days
Maybe you want to try this.
Regards,
Carlos
On 8/30/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
here is a hopefully functional example showing how to use an iframe to
upload a file and afterwards call a behavior on a component belonging to the
top frame, so that an ajax action could be
With the attachment, of course :).
On 9/10/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you want to try this.
Regards,
Carlos
On 8/30/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
here is a hopefully functional example showing how to use an iframe to
upload a file and
Where is this mounting done? What about parameter values?
What I've got is really quite simple. I have a static HTML page on an old
web site that needs to link to a wicket page. The wicket page pulls up a
list of products based on the category provided in the querystring parameter
in the URL.
V. Jenks schrieb:
Where is this mounting done?
its done in the init() of your WebApplication class e.g:
/**
* @see org.apache.wicket.examples.WicketExampleApplication#init()
*/
protected void init() {
mount(new HybridUrlCodingStrategy(/index, Index.class));
}
Where is this mounting done? What about parameter values?
You would typically do this in your application class, and parameters
are converted to part of the path or something else depending on how
you configure things. See for a simple example niceurl of
wicket-examples.
What I've got is
Thanks Ryan,
First pass this has worked well for me. Appreciate your detailed instructions.
Maybe these can be added to the open issue history itself for other folks till
the issue gets closed.
I assume you have to be developer to make changes to the change history.
-ed
From: [EMAIL
webapps arent really designed to do this, you will have to write the
appropriate hooks for your servlet container. eg your own sessionmanager for
tomcat, etc.
-igor
On 9/10/07, Zsolt Süli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, but I want to change dynamically. Say Joe wants to stay logged in,
so he
I assume you have to be developer to make changes to the change history.
you mean to the jira issue? you don't have to be a developer to add a
comment.
just sign up and you're ready to go.
gerolf
-ed
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: modal window question - opening a modal window
I'm interested. I've only just started, so every topic is helpful to
me :) Amersfoort is fine for me.
Danny
On 9/7/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I can organize one if there is enough interest
Martijn and i will be there then.
And for example if people are also interested
I think what you are looking for are the following steps
1) When a user first comes to the site check if they have a cookie from a
prior visit and automatically log them in.
2) If they don't have a cookie then redirect them to the login page
3) As they log in set a cookie on their browser so the
For what it's worth I've had some kind of similar needs for an open source
app I work on, and solved the problem of tabs without actually removing
them, but using bookmarkable links to select the tab.
You can check how I did this here:
hey,
sorry for this late response, i've just read this thread.
the reason behind all those tricky imports is the tinymce/ajax
compatibility. tinymce works very well when it is loaded at the same time
with parent page but when you try to load it using ajax then there is a
problem. anyway
the fix is committed, let me know if is works as expected.
good to be back to wicket ;)
/iulian
On 9/10/07, Benjamin Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I solved the problem by changing the TinyMceBehavior.renderHead()-method.
It now looks like this:
/**
* @see
Behind chickabee's attempt to provoke the Wicket community (which Eelco has
commendably resisted) lies a real message, namely that there are so many web
frameworks out there, that people only have enough time to kick the tyres
before deciding which one to use, and therefore first impressions are
so far i have heard a bunch of bitching but very little in the way of
concrete suggestions.
what are we to provide? a prebuilt project for eclipse? a prebuilt project
for netbeans? a prebuilt project for idea? a prebuilt project for jedit? a
prebuilt project for ant? a prebuilt project for make?
This is one reason that ruby on rails has taken off--the combination of
Instant Rails and Active Record makes it the easiest framework to get a
fully database-enabled application up and running.
Wicket has done a great job of making it easy to get up and running, but
there is always more to
Not to mention IDEA 7M2 (or even versions before that) can read a
maven pom, and use that directly. Netbeans also has a maven plugin
that does that (took me 1 minute to discover and less to install the
plugin).
I haven't used an Eclipse plugin for maven since the command line
version works really
Thanks guys, this has all been really helpful.
I'm having some bizarre results, even though the page is loading now. Some
of the images aren't loading and I'm getting exceptions that appear to tell
me that the images are being passed as the parameter values, as well?
I mounted the url like so
On 9/10/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so far i have heard a bunch of bitching but very little in the way of
concrete suggestions.
what are we to provide? a prebuilt project for eclipse? a prebuilt project
for netbeans? a prebuilt project for idea? a prebuilt project for jedit? a
There is no configuration option, you'll have to override css.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Ed _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking through the java docs - i see two settings for the modal window mask -
Transparent and Sem-transparent with an opacity of 10% - is there a way to
increase the opacity to
On 9/10/07, JulianS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
This is one reason that ruby on rails has taken off--the combination of
Instant Rails and Active Record makes it the easiest framework to get a
fully database-enabled application up and running.
snip
Julian
But the thing is, if someone
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
What Wicket version are you using? Because for reliable versioning you
will need 1.3. Also you problem can be browser caching the initial DOM
tree (not the modified one). So you should force browser to fire http
request on back button too - adding CacheControl:
It doesn't set the no-store flag.
protected void configureResponse()
{
super.configureResponse();
if (getWebRequestCycle().getResponse() instanceof WebResponse)
{
final WebResponse response =
Igor,
Thank you for your reply. I did see another message from you recently
on this same topic but the key the problem was having the private
Panel panel; field to store the reference.
-Anthony
On Sep 9, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
heh, seems a lot of people run into it. the
and that shouldn't be done because then backbutton or what ever you do will
always
request the page again, that would fix our back button problem even more :)
but thats
a horrible user experience
johan
On 9/10/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't set the no-store flag.
what are we to provide? a prebuilt project for eclipse? a prebuilt project
for netbeans? a prebuilt project for idea? a prebuilt project for jedit? a
prebuilt project for ant? a prebuilt project for make? a prebuilt project
for buildr? a prebuilt project for foo?
i want Igors Special Build
I am converting an existing JSP/BEA PageFlow to Wicket which I am learning a
lot from this exercise. Some page flows need to be secure, aka via https.
and when complete, the application flow needs to go back to http.
What is the best method to tackle this?
Is this trivial?
Am I missing
TEST - I tried to reply to this again, about an hour ago...but the message
still hasn't appeared. Should I just post it again?
V. Jenks wrote:
I'm sure this has been asked 1000x but I'm unable to find the answer...and
don't have enough time left to keep digging.
I simply want to call a
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo