Hi All,
I want to add the required validation on a RadioGroup component. I added the
setRequired(true); What happens is that if the user did not select a radio
choice the validation msg will be shown. what should be the case. but if the
user selected a radio after that, the same msg will appear?!
I added it .. Nothing changed?! I am still getting the same problem.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
add:
modes.setReuseItems(true);
Martijn
On 11/16/07, alshamsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I want to add the required validation on a RadioGroup component. I added the
setRequired(true); Wh
Nope, don't think so. But you can always use an AjaxSubmitLink or
AjaxSubmitButton to submit the form.
On a more general note: all activity inside the modaldialog should be ajax.
Maurice
On Nov 15, 2007 5:03 PM, Marco Aurélio Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm having problems to close
add:
modes.setReuseItems(true);
Martijn
On 11/16/07, alshamsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I want to add the required validation on a RadioGroup component. I added the
> setRequired(true); What happens is that if the user did not select a radio
> choice the validation msg will be s
what version of Wicket are you working on?
On 11/16/07, Suad AlShamsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I added it .. Nothing changed?! I am still getting the same problem.
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > add:
> >
> > modes.setReuseItems(true);
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On 11/16/07, alshamsi <[EMAIL PROT
Yep that would be more maintenable ;)
As an alternative, you could provide instanciation of components in markup.
I think i've seen some code doing just that in the hypothetical v2.0, is
this planned for 1.3 ?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 3:02 PM, Alexis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
hi all
I have base page for portlets and some page that inharitances base page.
Base page contains market name (Label)
public MarketTableBasePage(final PageParameters parameters)
throws StringValueConversionException {
String id =
parameters.getSt
Reading through all the responses on this thread, I can already see that
all the fundemental things in wicket I now take for granted forexample
as debugging. I guess I would have a hard time doing anything else by now.
regards Nino
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
I totally agree.
On Nov 16, 2007 1:42 AM, Alexis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yep that would be more maintenable ;)
> As an alternative, you could provide instanciation of components in markup.
> I think i've seen some code doing just that in the hypothetical v2.0, is
> this planned for 1.3 ?
We've had this hidd
I totally agree.
Wicket has made me a better developer. It actually makes you think in a
more OO way, comming from .net and jsp back in the day.
Comming from jsp and somewhat .net I had somewhat a hard time to grasp
the concept of models and the fact that wicket maintains whats selected
in t
Gwyn Evans schrieb:
but I'd suggest that the
correct place would be in a page below the "Integration guides" page
thanks, will do that on Sunday.
--
THOMAS DAILY GmbH
Adlerstraße 19
79098 Freiburg
Deutschland
T + 49 761 3 85 59 0
F + 49 761 3 85 59 550
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.thomas-dail
If you have patches that made our WicketTester better please add them to
jira.
johan
On Nov 16, 2007 10:24 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I totally agree.
>
> Wicket has made me a better developer. It actually makes you think in a
> more OO way, comming
Hi,
doe somebody manage to make tinymce work with an ajax submit button
regards
Marc
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a way to get a ModalWindow to open up along with its
underlying page? The usual show() takes an AjaxRequestTarget ... I
have at least one work around in mind (ripping out the ModalWindow
into a separate object so the launching page could show it too) but it
would be more elegant to just m
Hi,
In my spare time I'm building a CMS with wicket. I'm not developing it
actively, just playing with it in my spare time. So far I developed
the following bundles:
Wicket as an osgi bundle:
http://mybundles.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/wicket/wicket-bundle/
A simple wicket example application:
htt
If you don't want to maintain HTML/CSS and also have that generated
look at the layout manager frameworks like Echo2
johan
On Nov 16, 2007 7:21 AM, Joe Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Compare the java code to something in velocity/jsp like...
>
> href="/path/to/something.jsp?id=${draft.id}"
I am using 1.3 beta 4. I copied from wicket examples as well but its not
working.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I just did this in the FormInput example of Wicket examples
(1.3.0-rc1) and it works:
RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("numbersGroup");
ad
Hello all,
I have one question about the right naming of the Border component.
I think, that "Border" is a little confusing name, in context of swing-like
border.
In my opinion, border should be used as a decorator, that is transparent for
component,
which has it added --->>> it's like the n
On Nov 16, 2007 8:21 AM, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> - the api surface area /is/ a little bigger than it would ideally be. i
> wish i had stayed
> more on top of this. fighting to remove stuff and shrink the api is
> half
> the
> battle of making a framework. there are
>
> Cons:
> - steep learning curve
this really depends where you coming from.
For me wicket is simple, it feels natural.
Struts for example never did that for me.
Also tapestry that came close for me. But it still did itches.. still though
yeah close but not quite there.
Of course you need to le
Hi,
We encountered the same phenomenon with wicket dojo.
The reason is that if resources are loaded by a servlet engine when there is
no session cookie set to the client, the servlet engine does url rewriting,
and appends ?jsessionid=xxx to the urls it generates.
Dojo has some internal coding t
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael schrieb:
That could be great, that way we could support each other.. Do you have
an idea on how to get started?
i´ll contact you in private on sunday.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
For textareas and textfields I always do "onfocus='this.blur();'". It might
work for checkboxes as well.
On Nov 16, 2007 11:06 AM, mclev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a case where I'm using a checkbox to show boolean data in a table.
> However I want the data to be readonly.
>
> Is there
I have a case where I'm using a checkbox to show boolean data in a table.
However I want the data to be readonly.
Is there any way to make the CheckBox component readonly such that a user
could not change it from being checked to unchecked or vise versa?
matt clevenger
--
View this message in c
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
If you give us your sourceforge id, we can give you commit rights.
You'll have to team up with whoever else is maintaining that package
though; don't just go in and break the whole thing ;-)
Eelco
My SF ID is nihilisticz. I promise to play nice. :)
---
round-robin has a couple of disadvantages over sticky sessons:
a) you need to replicate state to all nodes - a lot of traffic
although with a fiber backplane its most likely not an issue. with
sticky sessions you only have to replicate to one or two other nodes
which act as backup buddies.
b) you
you will get an error, i have explained this in a parallel thread
yesterday... that is why we are working on a special page store that
will also write out the current page onto the disk when the session is
replicated - that means all nodes will have all the pages spooled to
disk so clustering will
That could be great, that way we could support each other.. Do you have
an idea on how to get started?
regards Nino
Uwe Schäfer wrote:
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael schrieb:
Im actually about to write a tutorial thing about howto
JPA-HIBERNATE-SPRING in wicket... It could be something
it might almost go without saying that i don't agree with these particular
cons.
html templates live next to java code because they are conceptually related
and so it makes sense to encapsulate them in the same package. what never
made sense to me was the other way of doing it. requiring a goo
perhaps one of the groups who are using wicket and osgi successfully
can put together an example project that demonstrates all these
concepts so the community does not have to reinvent the wheel and
solve problems that have already been solved by others...thats what
this is all about afterall
-igo
I just did this in the FormInput example of Wicket examples
(1.3.0-rc1) and it works:
RadioGroup group = new RadioGroup("numbersGroup");
add(group);
ListView persons = new ListView("numbers", NUMBERS)
{
Uwe Schäfer schrieb:
Maris Orbidans schrieb:
Let's remember good old EJB's. Inject an EntityManager in a session
bean facade and EJB container will handle all concurrency issues. No
need to write any boilerplate code.
that´s where i come from. problem is, that you domain object aren´t ab
I dont think ajax is a compromise .. Not for the kind of webframe work we
are..
We are a serverside framework. just like struts/jsf/tapestry.
I guess you compare it with full client side frameworks (gwt or echo2)
yes those are ajax through and through (they have to) But that doesn't mean
that
i cal
(Sorry, I should have added I found the September discussion, I
wondered if there was a more elegant solution in the meanwhile...)
On Nov 16, 2007 11:45 AM, Kirk Israel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to get a ModalWindow to open up along with its
> underlying page? The usual show() ta
On Nov 16, 2007 5:22 AM, Frank Martínez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working with jboss seam by about one year, now i am developing a
> wicket-seam integration based on wicket-seam-test.
Good to hear someone is working on it!
> I will send it to the wicket developers when i finish it.
I have an application which used Session EJB's to deliver data to
Wicket pages.
These are looked up using JNDI in the main application class: for the
sake of argument let's call it MainApplication.java.
I then have a BasePage.java from which all other pages that use these
EJB's inherit, i
Since it's a french-only thread, I follow up with french language ;-)
Antoine, peux tu dire le nom de ta société, à moins que ce soit
confidentiel-défense =^D ?
Antoine Angénieux wrote:
>
> We've been actively using Wicket since February and are based in Paris.
> We are a software editor comp
We've been actively using Wicket since February and are based in Paris.
We are a software editor company and used Wicket to develop all our web
applications since that time.
Cheers,
Antoine.
Hugues Pichereau a écrit :
Hi,
I was wondering if there are companies in France (and especially near
Fair enough. Good answer. :)
Of course I meant in the non-failure case.
So under normal operations outside of failure conditions, perhaps there
really is no benefit to move users to other nodes during the lifetime of a
session, or at least the difficulty outweighs the benefit.
- Lu
Marti
Hi,
I am working with jboss seam by about one year, now i am developing a
wicket-seam integration based on wicket-seam-test.
I will send it to the wicket developers when i finish it.
I am not expert on Wicket and i have some questions:
1. Are Wicket Components instantiated on every request?
2. In
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael schrieb:
Im actually about to write a tutorial thing about howto
JPA-HIBERNATE-SPRING in wicket... It could be something worth looking
at, Im trying to have a clean seperation of domain / database and
frontend (wicket).
interesting. i could write a WICKET-
Hugues Pichereau a écrit :
Hi,
I was wondering if there are companies in France (and especially near Paris)
known to use Wicket (except Anyware Technologies, at Toulouse, which seems
well known for that) ?
we are not a SSII , but here at the ESSEC DEV Team and we use it ;)
Regards,
Hugu
Hello everyone.
Preamble: I want to forbid simultaneous login of the same user from
different clients. In particular I must handle opening of new window in the
same session (Ctrl+N in IE). To achieve this I override
WebPage.onNewBrowserWindow().
Here is the use case that causes a problem.
1. A u
> if you use EJB3 you really want to use the wicket-contrib-javaee project
> (wicketstuff) all you need to do is call you @EJB and rest is handled
> automatically !
>
That project needs an update for 1.3
Add wicket-ioc dep / remove spring dep + some other unneeded deps /
fix package names, I conta
On Nov 16, 2007 8:15 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> components are not instantiated on every request - they are only
> instantiated when YOU instantiate them using the NEW operator...wicket
> is unmanaged.
>
> the problem with using onbeforerender is that some components need
> acc
One BIG plus that I haven't seen mentioned is debuggability. A wicket
application is almost as easy to debug as a regular application. For one
thing the error messages are really great. 90% of the time the nail the
problem. But the biggest plus is that the whole control flow is just in
regular Java
There's nothing on the Wiki at the moment, but I'd suggest that the
correct place would be in a page below the "Integration guides" page
at http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/integration-guides.html. Just go
there, then "Add page" and it should automatically appear in the
"Reference page/Integration G
and does it really work?
On Nov 15, 2007 1:43 AM, Maurice Marrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a lot of people out there asking about wicket and acegi and
> how to integrate them. And until recently the only answer was check
> the wiki
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET
Hi everybody,
I'm using nested forms in my web app to provide to the user a simple way for
editting a product and its stock state at the same time (PRODUCTS and STOCKS
are bound with a relation 1-n in my database). So I've defined a form for
each of my tables.
When I submit a nested form (in t
On Nov 16, 2007 6:06 PM, mclev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a case where I'm using a checkbox to show boolean data in a table.
> However I want the data to be readonly.
Try setEnabled(false), works on any Component.
Szocske
--
Maris Orbidans schrieb:
Let's remember good old EJB's. Inject an EntityManager in a session
bean facade and EJB container will handle all concurrency issues. No
need to write any boilerplate code.
that´s where i come from. problem is, that you domain object aren´t able
to lazily fetch atta
Let's remember good old EJB's. Inject an EntityManager in a session
bean facade and EJB container will handle all concurrency issues. No
need to write any boilerplate code.
BTW I have seen that some people use OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter and
map it to url pattern "/*". It seems that a
yeah, i'm afraid i agree with you now. ;-)
oh well. hindsight is 20/20. otoh, if this is some of the biggest stuff
we can find to complain about, i think we did pretty damn well.
Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> On Nov 16, 2007 8:21 AM, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> - th
Francis De Brabandere schrieb:
if you use EJB3 you really want to use the wicket-contrib-javaee project
(wicketstuff) all you need to do is call you @EJB and rest is handled
automatically !
That project needs an update for 1.3
Add wicket-ioc dep / remove spring dep + some other unneeded deps
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
> A possible con are that the testing part of wicket could be improved by
> having more convenince methods. Also there seems to be some trouble
> testing if you use spring injection for your beans.
jdave-wicket has more convenience
In order to avoid ClassCastException, when constructing a new instance of
WicketTester, initialize it with your MainApplication:
WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(new MainApplication());
Andy Barlow [Deftex] wrote:
>
> I have an application which used Session EJB's to deliver data to
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:54:39AM -0800, Curtis Cooley wrote:
> Michael Laccetti wrote:
> > John Krasnay wrote:
> >> To me this is the biggest con. I've worked with a number of Java devs
> >> who have trouble grokking anonymous inner classes, which you must know
> >> cold to be effective with Wick
On Nov 16, 2007 8:37 AM, saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Johan, are you saying that other types of load balancing strategies besides
> sticky sessions are all flawed, and that it only makes sense to use sticky
> sessions? Please correct my understanding.
>
> If sticky sessions are the only recom
hello i am upgrading from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.3 rc1, and feedback messaging is
not showing up with setResponse page.
i am doing
Page userPage = getUserPage();
//1.2.6 version code which was fine
// userPage.getFeedbackMessage().info(userPage, getUser().getDescription() +
" Saved");
//now i changed
On Nov 16, 2007 10:33 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you can still cluster 1.3.1 easily. either use httpsessionstore or
> tell wicket to save pages to a shared drive
Or use that project Matej is working on. It works.
Eelco
-
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> you can still cluster 1.3.1 easily. either use httpsessionstore or
> tell wicket to save pages to a shared drive
>
Thanks Igor. Are you saying that we can configure Wicket to store old
versions of Pages in the HttpSessionStore (in memory)? If so, how do we
configure t
Also, can someone answer this other question I asked?
saenz wrote:
>
>> Also -- if page serialization is disabled, what happens when the user
>> hits
>> the back button?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Disabling-serialization-storage-of-pages-in-session--tf4768006.h
Im actually about to write a tutorial thing about howto
JPA-HIBERNATE-SPRING in wicket... It could be something worth looking
at, Im trying to have a clean seperation of domain / database and
frontend (wicket).
A few things that seems cant be seperated, the
openEntityManagerInView(in your web
Only the active statefull page is in session. So if you go to the next page
then the previous page is gone from the session (and written to the disk for
back button support)
johan
On Nov 15, 2007 11:42 PM, saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> > The DiskStore is f
Thanks Alex
That would of course resolve the ClassCastException, but it doesn't
event get to the original failure point: in fact, it fails earlier
because it is not being run within a J2EE context and consequently
fails as soon as an attempt is made to do a JNDI lookup on the session
bean
And you need a framework for this? Come on!
Chris Colman wrote:
>
>> Chris Colman wrote:
>>
>> It seems it's also possible for a few other ORM tools to conform to
> that
>> standard. Apart from Hibernate and JPOX you've got TopLink, Cayenne
> and
>> others.
>
> That's my point.
>
>>
>> Whi
Michael Laccetti wrote:
> John Krasnay wrote:
>> To me this is the biggest con. I've worked with a number of Java devs
>> who have trouble grokking anonymous inner classes, which you must know
>> cold to be effective with Wicket.
>
> Quite a con indeed. Wicket is not a framework that most people n
On Nov 15, 2007 11:22 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the recommended deployment model to support back-button usage
> via
> > undoable changes and disk-based serialized storage with Wicket? Is it
> only
> > possible using a load balancer configured to be "sticky" (keep s
we are not working within the context of swing here are we? so to say
something doesnt make sense within the context doesnt make any sense.
anyways, the border is called border because it wraps other components.
eg:
class myborder extends border { myborder() { add(new label("a","a"));
add(new la
I am using the same approach for testing wicket components and it works like
charm. Though I'm using Spring for service injection, I do not see any
difference when it is about EJB services.
The whole idea of WicketTester, is to test it outside the container, so you
can use EasyMock to mock your
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> you will get an error, i have explained this in a parallel thread
> yesterday... that is why we are working on a special page store that
> will also write out the current page onto the disk when the session is
> replicated - that means all nodes will have all the pages s
J'imagine que l'ESSEC DEV correspond aux projets internes de l'école ESSEC?
godin wrote:
>
> Hugues Pichereau a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering if there are companies in France (and especially near
>> Paris)
>> known to use Wicket (except Anyware Technologies, at Toulouse, which
>> seems
>
you can still cluster 1.3.1 easily. either use httpsessionstore or
tell wicket to save pages to a shared drive
-igor
On Nov 16, 2007 10:20 AM, saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
> >
> > you will get an error, i have explained this in a parallel thread
> > yesterday... th
So my back up plans didn't work out as well as I had hoped.
Is there any answer to this?
Obviously, it would be lovely if there was some equivalent of the
javascript body onLoad command (and maybe tied in with that) that
could give the user an AjaxRequestTarget to play with... Is there
anything l
> Back button in ajax (so an ajax request triggers a change that then should
> be a backbutton change?)
> "Everything" on the serverside is ready for that.. Somebody just need to
> write the javascript/behavior..
> But nobody seems to really want to have that...
This is one of the things I meant t
Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 11:22 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Recommended is to use sticky sessions.
>
> +1
>
> none sticky sessions are flawed anyway.. (or the synchronizing performance
> hit is so great it doesn't make any sense, it it makes sense t
you're in!
On 11/16/07, Michael Laccetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> > If you give us your sourceforge id, we can give you commit rights.
> > You'll have to team up with whoever else is maintaining that package
> > though; don't just go in and break the whole thing ;-)
>
failover?
On 11/16/07, saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 15, 2007 11:22 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> Recommended is to use sticky sessions.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > none sticky sessions are flawed anyway.. (or the synchronizing pe
Edgar and all,
I am new to wicket but have built an application using Velocity and Equinox
OSGi. I am hoping to switch from Velocity to Wicket. Edgar's code below is
most helpful! Do you or anyone have any other code to share? Bundles? For
example, this code would be helpful as well
"you hav
Hi,
Do you have problems with it?
I tried it over a year ago, and as far as I remember there was nothing to
it. That was Wicket 1.2.3 and tinymce from back then.
Frank
On Nov 16, 2007 5:24 PM, godin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> doe somebody manage to make tinymce work with an ajax submit
>
> * Not stateless (i'm talking about the stable 1.2 here)
thats not a con anymore because 1.3 is pretty good now in that area.
>
> * Too much alternatives to do quite the same things (markup inheritance vs
> borders; passing component's constructors models, full objects or even
> components;
On Nov 16, 2007 11:36 AM, narup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hello i am upgrading from wicket 1.2.6 to 1.3 rc1, and feedback messaging is
> not showing up with setResponse page.
>
> i am doing
> Page userPage = getUserPage();
> //1.2.6 version code which was fine
> // userPage.getFeedbackMessage(
Edgar,
Cool! I have been thinking Java could at long last have a good CMS, if
someone were to do it using OSGi. I might want to be your first user.
I am curious: what version of Jetty are you using? Where did you get the
appropriate bundles? Could you share your Activator code that starts Jet
By the way, my question below still has not been answered. Can anyone explain
what would occur in the following scenario?
> My question regarding on-disk page storage relates to the use case of a
> web-app deployed on a cluster. In this situation, what will happen if the
> following occurs?
>
components are not instantiated on every request - they are only
instantiated when YOU instantiate them using the NEW operator...wicket
is unmanaged.
the problem with using onbeforerender is that some components need
access to resources from inside their constructors which is too early
to be hand
Hello All,
I love to use CompoundPropertyModel whenever I can, and I had a debate today
on how to appropriately use it within a ListView.
Here is the markup, this is the start of the implementation of a message
panel:
in the java code I set the model of the page initially:
setModel(new Compo
On Nov 16, 2007 8:02 PM, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That project needs an update for 1.3
> > Add wicket-ioc dep / remove spring dep + some other unneeded deps /
> > fix package names, I contacted the author but got no response.
> > Plus you have to define all beans in the web.xm
yeah, strong coding is about making strong choices. when you
/know/ a design decision (such as this one -- separating markup
from code) is the right decision, you need to stick to your guns
and not lose the whole war because you want to win some little
battle. the fact that it takes a little m
And when you say using HttpSessionStore, you mean storing the pageMap in the
session only rather serializing the pages at all in the disk,database etc as
was the the case with earlier wicket implementation..
Farhan.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> On Nov 12, 2007 6:21 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTE
thanks for your response igor,
yes, you are right, i understand, that in the output html border wraps
its content -> so it's looks like border for nested components.
What we both mean, is the same, difference is only from point of view.
My point of view is, that generally (in desktop GUI like Sw
> Oh, and type-safe models are a must, I was surprised to read in this
> thread not everybody agrees with that. Especially since type erasure
> ensures backwards compatibility, and lets the cast-fans stick to their
> habits :-)
The problem that I have with type safe models is that in order to fit
These two are the exact same things I have in mind about wicket:
On Nov 15, 2007 10:18 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've always had in my mind that the perfect
> approach to state handling would be to give users the choice between
> server managed and client managed (i.e. by pa
Guys,
I am yet bringing the same question again, regarding the SLCSS and the need
to maintain it the older versions of the page on the disk or otherwise...and
would really appreciate if some of my questions could be addressed here..
Before i go into Second Level Cache..i would say that i still c
Hi,
I use a RepeatingView on a page, and get the following error:
23:48:32,970 WARN [AbstractRepeater] Child component of repeater
org.apache.wicket.markup.repeater.RepeatingView:layoutContainers has a
non-safe child id of container0. Safe child ids must be composed of
digits only.
Why is
what do you mean with disabled? how is it disabled?
The page can't be serialized because of none serializeable attributes?
Then in the default 1.3 configuration that page can't be saved to disk so
you can't restore it.
johan
On Nov 16, 2007 8:56 PM, saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Also, c
Application
*
protected* *abstract* ISessionStore newSessionStore();
johan
On Nov 16, 2007 8:54 PM, saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
> >
> > you can still cluster 1.3.1 easily. either use httpsessionstore or
> > tell wicket to save pages to a shared drive
> >
>
>
yes HttpSessionStore is what is default in 1.2
On Nov 16, 2007 10:51 PM, mfs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And when you say using HttpSessionStore, you mean storing the pageMap in
> the
> session only rather serializing the pages at all in the disk,database etc
> as
> was the the case with ear
No it is a bit different
the SLC is for back button support.
The reason that we have the latest page in the session is because thats the
live
page where all the action is on. So that page is NOT used when the users
hits the backbutton
that page is only used when the users clicks a link or submits a
what i always wonder.. How do you sync sessions?
That's why i think none sticky sessions are just flawed..
Do remember that we in wicket have a single threaded mode.
How on earth are you going to do that if you have none sticky sessions?
If request a comes in alters the page, but then at +/- at th
hmm
that is pretty much killed with the basic 1.3 setting now because we have a
file on disk
thats pretty much a database file with multiiply pages now but the index of
that file, where the
page starts is in mem..
so for clustering and a shared disk the only solution we currently have
(besides the
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
