Re: Documentation for RequestLogger

2013-08-07 Thread Jens Jahnke
Hi, On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 10:11:30 +0200 Martin Grigorov wrote: MG> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jens Jahnke MG> wrote: MG> MG> > Hi, MG> > MG> > On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:11:34 -0400 MG> > Paul Bors wrote: MG> > MG> > PB> Isn't Log4J shipped with the quick-start? MG> > PB> MG> > PB> Create your

Re: Documentation for RequestLogger

2013-08-07 Thread Cedric Gatay
I guess he's talking of its current log4j setup which logs to stdout __ Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay ) http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info | http://cedric.gatay.fr On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10

Re: Documentation for RequestLogger

2013-08-07 Thread Martin Grigorov
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Jens Jahnke wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:11:34 -0400 > Paul Bors wrote: > > PB> Isn't Log4J shipped with the quick-start? > PB> > PB> Create yourself a quick-start and analyze it: > PB> http://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html > PB> > PB> PS: You

Re: Documentation for RequestLogger

2013-08-07 Thread Jens Jahnke
Hi, On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:11:34 -0400 Paul Bors wrote: PB> Isn't Log4J shipped with the quick-start? PB> PB> Create yourself a quick-start and analyze it: PB> http://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html PB> PB> PS: You can also check the initialization related topics as well as PB> your fir

RE: Documentation for RequestLogger

2013-08-06 Thread Paul Bors
Isn't Log4J shipped with the quick-start? Create yourself a quick-start and analyze it: http://wicket.apache.org/start/quickstart.html PS: You can also check the initialization related topics as well as your first stop for Wicket's doc via the Wicket Free Guide at: http://wicket.apache.org/learn/

Re: documentation

2013-01-28 Thread Philippe Demaison
The community is very responsive. Thanks you very much, the documentation will help us. Philippe Demaison 2013/1/25 Martin Grigorov > Hi, > > I just pushed a new branch named 'reference-guide' to our Git repo. > It contains the setup to write documentation and include code samples from > wicke

Re: documentation

2013-01-25 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, I just pushed a new branch named 'reference-guide' to our Git repo. It contains the setup to write documentation and include code samples from wicket-examples project. This is just the first step. It will receive more updates. You can see how it looks at: http://martin-g.github.com/wicket-ref

Re: documentation

2013-01-24 Thread Andrea Del Bene
For what it's worth :) I'm about to finish a free reference document for Wicket 6. I've started to write it almost one and a half years ago and it should be ready by the end of February. The example code used in the document are hosted here https://github.com/bitstorm/Wicket-tutorial-examples T

Re: documentation

2013-01-24 Thread Philippe Demaison
This is great ! I am looking forward to reading the new documentation. Best regards Phlippe 2013/1/23 Rob Schroeder > Hi all, > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:25:41 +0100, Guillaume Smet wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Philippe Demaison > > wrote: > > > Are you kidding ? > > > > First

Re: documentation

2013-01-23 Thread Rob Schroeder
Hi all, On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:25:41 +0100, Guillaume Smet wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Philippe Demaison > wrote: > > Are you kidding ? > > First thing first, while everyone agrees that a good documentation is > a good thing, you should consider that you don't pay anyone to write

Re: documentation

2013-01-23 Thread Andy Van Den Heuvel
Projects like Springframework use docbook. It's really nice, You put all documentation in xml files which are in the scm and when you release it, you have documentation per release. On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Philippe De

Re: documentation

2013-01-23 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi, On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Philippe Demaison wrote: > If I had your knowledge and more time (project manager), I wish I could > help. > Many people have said this... But I know exactly what you mean about the missing reference. I have an idea to start writing a reference guide that

Re: documentation

2013-01-23 Thread Philippe Demaison
If I had your knowledge and more time (project manager), I wish I could help. Best regards Philippe 2013/1/22 Thies Edeling > Wicket is open source, if you feel that the documentation is lacking - feel > free to contribute. > On Jan 22, 2013 5:54 PM, "Philippe Demaison" > wrote: > > > Hi Ondr

Re: documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Thies Edeling
Wicket is open source, if you feel that the documentation is lacking - feel free to contribute. On Jan 22, 2013 5:54 PM, "Philippe Demaison" wrote: > Hi Ondra and Kees, > > Are you kidding ? > > Are you saying that I need to > > - read a book released in 2009 covering wicket 1.3 ? > - read http:/

RE: documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Paul Bors
ume.s...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:26 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: documentation Hi Philippe, On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Philippe Demaison wrote: > Are you kidding ? First thing first, while everyone agrees that a good documentation is a good thing, yo

Re: documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Guillaume Smet
Hi Philippe, On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Philippe Demaison wrote: > Are you kidding ? First thing first, while everyone agrees that a good documentation is a good thing, you should consider that you don't pay anyone to write it. There are a couple of very good books about Wicket you can pu

Re: documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Paul Bors
If you're interested in learning Wicket, see the Learn section on the project's home page at: http://wicket.apache.org/ It has its own Books link: http://wicket.apache.org/learn/books/ ~ Thank you, Paul Bors On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > no, my sug

Re: documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Ondrej Zizka
Hi Philippe, no, my suggestions were rather for learning wicket. However it's not quite easy to "evaluate" something you don't have knowledge of. At first glance, Wicket may seem quite verbose on Java side. I personally didn't like it for the first time. But once I understood the basic concep

Re: documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Philippe Demaison
Hi Ondra and Kees, Are you kidding ? Are you saying that I need to - read a book released in 2009 covering wicket 1.3 ? - read http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/index.html (for which wicket version ? ) - read the Wicket Cookbook - read the migration from 1.x to 1.5 https://cwiki.apac

Re: documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Ondrej Zizka
Hi Phillipe, you're right, the documentation deserves improvements. I would recommend you to start with the Wicket in Action book. That will give you the basic concepts of Wicket. Then continue with the examples from http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/index.html . That will enforce

Re: documentation

2013-01-22 Thread Kees van Dieren
Sorry for that, some good articles that might help you : http://www.devproof.org/why_choose_apache_wicket http://www.devproof.org/wicket_best_practice 2013/1/22 Philippe Demaison > Hi All, > > As Gabor Friedrich from the FAO, we are in my company, L'Oreal, comparing > different web frameworks.