Hi,
I'd like to do whitelist receipients for my domains with Spamcontrol.
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/spamcontrol/README_spamcontrol.html
In the documentation, it's write we can't use RECIPIENT features with
virtuals domains :
The RECIPIENTS extension makes qmail-smtpd aware of acceptable local
Hi,
At 13:15 30.06.04 +0200, you wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to do whitelist receipients for my domains with Spamcontrol.
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/spamcontrol/README_spamcontrol.html
In the documentation, it's write we can't use RECIPIENT features with
virtuals domains :
The RECIPIENTS extension
Title: RE: [vchkpw] SATA NAS for vpop cluster
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 17:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking around for a suitable (ie, reasonably priced and
performance)
NAS unit in order to convert a bunch of standalone servers
into a cluster.
SATA RAID units seem to be what
Erwin Hoffmann a ecrit :
[...]
But some people say it's possible, so ?
conf-spamcontrol:
locals=no
./spamcontrol.sh -u 2212; ./spamcontrol.sh; make; make setup
I have this problem yet, local users can't send email
to untrusted user :
freezer:# telnet localhost 25
Escape character is '^]'.
220
Hello,
I am trying to setup an email system and use Sqwebmail as a web-based
frontend. I am doing this on a Gentoo box. I have installed Qmail,
Vpopmail and Courier-IMAP via gentoo's portage system. I have it all
configured and sending/receiving email properly (from what I can tell)
by
Salut,
At 16:55 30.06.04 +0200, you wrote:
Erwin Hoffmann a ecrit :
[...]
But some people say it's possible, so ?
conf-spamcontrol:
locals=no
./spamcontrol.sh -u 2212; ./spamcontrol.sh; make; make setup
I have this problem yet, local users can't send email
to untrusted user :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking around for a suitable (ie, reasonably priced and
performance)
NAS unit in order to convert a bunch of standalone servers
into a cluster.
SATA RAID units seem to be what I am looking for.
I would appreciate those out there who have experience using
NAS
On Jun 29, 2004, at 10:53 PM, Kaan Ertürk wrote:
I also typed 'libtoolize --force' and the result is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] vpopmail-5.4.5]# libtoolize --force
Remember to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' to `configure.in'.
Using `AC_PROG_RANLIB' is rendered obsolete by `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL'
You should update your
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 09:48 am, Eric Anderson wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to setup an email system and use Sqwebmail as a web-based
frontend. I am doing this on a Gentoo box. I have installed Qmail,
Vpopmail and Courier-IMAP via gentoo's portage system. I have it all
configured and
or use uebimiau
http://www.uebimiau.org
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Kitchen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Qmail, Vpopmail, Sqwebmail, Courier-IMAP and Gentoo
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 09:48 am, Eric Anderson
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 08:36, Rainer Duffner wrote:
NetApp is really the high-end of storage, but also from a price-viewpoint.
But if you have enough customers and/or pretty strict SLAs, there's
hardly a choice, unless you want to gamble ;-)
The clustering-software is very expensive - and
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
or use uebimiau
http://www.uebimiau.org
Looking at the front page it says that this program is POP3/IMAP
frontend. I am looking for something that will directly read the Maildir
files to keep the performance good.
Eric
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
eww. don't use that. Gentoo's qmail and qmail-related ebuilds are totally
screwed.
That is what I am stuck with. I don't have time to maintain each package
on the system individually so ebuilds are the only way I can keep my
admin time down.
remove all that crap and
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 01:27 pm, Eric Anderson wrote:
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
eww. don't use that. Gentoo's qmail and qmail-related ebuilds are
totally screwed.
That is what I am stuck with. I don't have time to maintain each package
on the system individually so ebuilds are the only
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
what's to maintain about qmail? It never changes. It hasn't changed in 6
years.
HA! Good point! That was the main reason I chose qmail in the first
place. It's partly about consistency. I don't really like to install
software unless it is part of the package management
hi
i'm using spamassasin with vpopmail (5.4.5). maildrop runs spamc
from the users .qmail and uses the -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
loading the users settings. now that works fine. but if i wanna
use sa-learn to train my bayes filter, i can't set it to the
right user? how do people solve this
First, is there a way to disable the Dir Control functionality of
vpopmail?
If not, is there any downside to just not using it?
You may ask why I need to do this.
We do our own hashing of directories and usernames here, using our own
script systems.
I like this because the paths that we are
I need to disable hash dir for domains in vpopmail. when i create a new
domain, the directory is /home/vpopmail/domains/0/domain, and don't need
the 0 dir hash.
Thanks
Marcos
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 03:37 pm, Brian Feeny wrote:
First, is there a way to disable the Dir Control functionality of
vpopmail?
Sure. Use this option
--disable-users-big-dir
If not, is there any downside to just not using it?
Just the optimization for keeping the number of directories in
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 04:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to disable hash dir for domains in vpopmail. when i create a new
domain, the directory is /home/vpopmail/domains/0/domain, and don't need
the 0 dir hash.
configure vpopmail with this option:
--disable-users-big-dir
Becareful,
Hi Ken,
I tried configure vpopmail 5.4.5 with option --disable-users-big-dir and
didn't work.
I have 100 domains in /home/vpopmail/domains after this, vpopmail create
/home/vpopmail/domain/0 with more 100 domains, after
/home/vpopmail/domains/1 with more 100 domains. I would like put this
domains
My mistake, that feature only disables users directory hashing.
It doesn't override the domain directory hashing.
Ken Jones
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 05:59 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ken,
I tried configure vpopmail 5.4.5 with option --disable-users-big-dir and
didn't work.
I have 100
Ken,
Thanks for answering. I did see that disable-users-big-dir option,
so I configured with it.
It seems to still do the following though:
1. create .dir-control in the domains directory.
2. complain when removing a domain that it can't delete the dir control.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 06:13 pm, Brian Feeny wrote:
Ken,
Thanks for answering. I did see that disable-users-big-dir option,
so I configured with it.
It seems to still do the following though:
1. create .dir-control in the domains directory.
2. complain when removing a domain that it
On Jun 30, 2004, at 4:13 PM, Brian Feeny wrote:
Thanks for answering. I did see that disable-users-big-dir option,
so I configured with it.
It seems to still do the following though:
1. create .dir-control in the domains directory.
2. complain when removing a domain that it can't delete the dir
On Jun 30, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Tom Collins wrote:
What version of vpopmail? I thought we took care of that error
message (Warning: Failed to delete dir_control for test.com) during
the development cycle leading up to 5.4.0. It was due to the domain's
directory getting deleted before the
Hello,
Apologies
if this question has been asked before, but a search through Google, usenet,
and even the archives of this list turned up nothing for me.
I am
running an OpenBSD 3.x system with qmail/vpopmail installed and running
wonderfully. I am worried about POPing my mail from
Hello:
If this is a faq please let me know the link. Which is the best way to
configure mutt to access an email account on a server which uses qmail,
vpopmail and an imap server (courier).
Any hint will be appreciated.
--
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
| Hello:
|
| If this is a faq please let me know the link. Which is the best way
| to configure mutt to access an email account on a server which uses
| qmail, vpopmail and an imap server (courier).
|
| Any hint will be
http://vpopmail.sf.net/
Release Notes:
This release is identical to 5.4.5, but with the addition of all patches
included in 5.5.0.
These patches, related to the database backends, include code to
protect against SQL exploits (where user-entered data isn't escaped
before placing it in a query).
On Jun 30, 2004, at 4:18 PM, Ken Jones wrote:
Yep. Looks like whoever added the Warning message code needed to
ifdef it with the big user dir define.
Added to CVS and scheduled for 5.4.7.
--- vpopmail.c 26 Jun 2004 02:20:56 - 1.28.2.4
+++ vpopmail.c 1 Jul 2004 05:29:45 - 1.28.2.5
@@ -262,9
31 matches
Mail list logo
