--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, rudy.jahchan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a human interaction of breaking contract and at some point
needs to be dealt as such.
-- Enric
Everyone, listen to Enric. He is wise and terrible, like a god. I
shall raise a holy army in his name
I didnt realize before that the digg was to my blog post.
so, i made a more entertaining image to go along with it
http://spreadthemedia.org/files/ohmyheavy.jpg
;)
night.
sull
On 1/4/07, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good news, folks. The story has now made the front page of
Den 04.01.2007 kl. 08:07 skrev rudy.jahchan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is no difference. Copyright is what enables licensing. And
since they're linking rather than re-hosting, there is no copyright
issue.
Incorrect. Copyright states who owns and has the right to make
decisions on a piece
When I described Myheavy.com as privately help I got 'em mixed up
with that other Maxim-esque site, Break.com. My bad.
Man, I take a break from the web for a night and all hell breaks
loose Has anyone heard from Myheavy? Mike, Casey, David
anyone? My vids are one there as well and I will need to send an
email but are we hearing back, or are they turning a deaf ear?
Please let me know and the group as
I havent heard anything back from them yet. Maybe they are looking for
their checkbook to send me my $68,000? ha!
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Man, I take a break from the web for a night and all hell breaks
i think practicality wins out here Lucas
it appears that the divining job was not too tough for them as the
videos I indicated to them are now removed.
markus
On Jan 3, 2007, at 10:03 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
You refused to identify the vids, asking them to figure out for you
what those
Didn't our Republican led government just hamstring our ability to
get together to form class action lawsuits? Or was that just for
medicine?
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com/vlog
http://pawsitivevybe.com
On Jan 3, 2007, at 10:15 PM, Enric wrote:
There is absolutely no reason not to blog about this whenever it happens.
It's not about mobbing for sake of mobbing. This is a legit concern and it
should be on the radar of any reputable service in this space.
Sull is right. On the contrary, we SHOULD blog about this. First because
this
I wrote them this:
I've found out that you have reposted my videos, violating the license that
is clearly shown in each video.
Please take down these videos from your site immediately. Don't tell me they
were uploaded by a member - they were not.
I am contacting my laywers about this case.
Peter
They are modifying my video and releasing it under a different
license for profit and they are not giving me attribution. Seems
pretty cut and dried to me.
Ron Watson
http://k9disc.blip.tv
http://k9disc.com
http://pawsitivevybe.com/vlog
http://pawsitivevybe.com
On Jan 4, 2007, at 1:32 AM,
[snip]
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A custom flash player
written by online video company MyHeavy.com that overlays
their logo,
display ads on top prior to rolling and such is clearly
different to
any observer and the consumer from a browser.
Not to the web it
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Watson
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:00 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
Vlogger CC Licenses
They are modifying my video and releasing it under a
different license for profit
[snip]
okay...so they are just pulling in videos from feeds...and
overlaying the watermark/videos on top...
as Lucas says...yes, video hosting sites like Blip.tv can
just redirect...
and insert all Blip ads into the old URL...
I can do this on a case-by-case basis.
The Referer header is unreliable.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucas Gonze
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:25 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
, January 04, 2007 10:00 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
Vlogger CC Licenses
They are modifying my video and releasing it under a
different license for profit and they are not giving me
attribution. Seems pretty cut
Update.
It appears that all my videos have been remove from their site.
Such a shame too. I was thinking that $68,000 would have made a nice
donation to Blip. Sorry Mike.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I
On 1/4/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Referer header is unreliable.
Faking the Referer header *would* be a cause worth litigating, but
they're not doing that.
, January 04, 2007 11:59 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC Licenses
Update.
It appears that all my videos have been remove from their site.
Such a shame too. I was thinking that $68,000 would have made
a nice donation
-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lucas Gonze
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:51 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
Vlogger CC Licenses
On 1/4/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 1/4/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's correct. The problem is that we do want to be picky. We want to
allow people to use VPIP to play back videos hosted on blip, but we
don't want to allow them to use the MyHeavy player on MyHeavy.com
(unless it's the content creator
.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Howell
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:59 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC Licenses
Update.
It appears that all my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did the site break, or did they just clear out a chunk of their collection?
An hour ago I found my videos in there, along with several others, simply
by searching for 'hawaii.' Now, there's only one result.
Ryan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
This is a case for Brainstorming. For example, what's wrong with a
tool which allows each user to define a whitelist and blacklist? If
that were doable it would be a wonderful competitive advantage for
Blip. If I worked there I would propose that Blip be the first video
hosting
Yes, my search for cirne came up empty. Looks like they removed
both my blip.tv and Google Video entries. Yes!
This is a human problem of disregarding a license. And the human
responses have been clear, specific to the problem and resolved
quickly. The interactions with Veoh and Heavy with
: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:59 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC Licenses
Update.
It appears that all my videos have been remove from their site.
Such a shame too. I was thinking that $68,000 would have made
a nice
that will be the
message he delivers.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Howell
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:59 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC
Of David Howell
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:59 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC Licenses
Update.
It appears that all my videos have been remove from their site.
Such a shame too. I was thinking
This is a case for Brainstorming. For example, what's
wrong with a
tool which allows each user to define a whitelist and
blacklist? If
that were doable it would be a wonderful competitive advantage for
Blip. If I worked there I would propose that Blip be the
first video
Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Ozawa
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:29 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
Vlogger CC Licenses
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
looks like any blip related search yields nothing
but some videos still exist
like from direct links:
*http://tinyurl.com/y54hcd*
maybe they're just in the process of fixing this all
but the search seems purged
On 1/4/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a case for
On a related note, how can 3rd parties go about accessing the creative
commons or copyright licence attached to blip.tv videos? Im afraid I
havent studied this to see what blip already does, is the cc stuff
included in the blip RSS feed, or through an API if you offer one?
And thanks again,
Yes, my search for cirne came up empty. Looks like they removed
both my blip.tv and Google Video entries. Yes!
not so simple.
i assume they are still working on it.
A search on MyHeavy brings back no results of any of the videos off of Blip.
http://www.myheavy.com/search
But my deep links
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, my search for cirne came up empty. Looks like they removed
both my blip.tv and Google Video entries. Yes!
not so simple.
i assume they are still working on it.
A search on MyHeavy brings back no results
Thats a technical issue. Those links arent really static links. The
video.php file is clearly designed to take a url from the bit after
the ? in the url. I could put a link to any video there and it would work.
Hmm I think I fudged that explanation. Your videos arent really living
on their
: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC Licenses
On a related note, how can 3rd parties go about accessing the
creative commons or copyright licence attached to blip.tv
videos? Im afraid I havent studied this to see what blip
already does, is the cc stuff included in the blip RSS
Hi all,
The french press is talking about MyHeavy
http://www.pointblog.com/past/2007/01/04/
myheavy_ne_respecte_pas_les_vloggers.htm
Pointblog is one of the most important blog in France
Nice day ;-)
Loiez
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:47 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
Vlogger CC Licenses
looks like any blip related search yields nothing but some
videos still exist like from direct links:
*http://tinyurl.com/y54hcd
See my earlier e-mail about this.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay dedman
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:48 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC Licenses
There's a message on the digg entry about this,
http://tinyurl.com/yd349m
, apparently from someone who works at Heavy:
===
Hey guys - we've taken the search and play functionality from
Blip and Google down. After
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
The french press is talking about MyHeavy
http://www.pointblog.com/past/2007/01/04/
myheavy_ne_respecte_pas_les_vloggers.htm
Pointblog is one of the most important blog in France
Nice day ;-)
Loiez
Mike Hudack wrote:
this would definitely be cool.
I could go into my Blip dhasboard and simply balcklist any
site I didnt want to link to me.
how complicated would this be on a user by user basis?
That is interesting. I'm going to noodle on this.
mod_rewrite would be an obvious way to do
1:05 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC Licenses
On a related note, how can 3rd parties go about accessing the
creative commons or copyright licence attached to blip.tv
videos? Im afraid I havent studied
@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Watkins
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:51 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC Licenses
Cheers for the info :) This means there is no technical
barrier
Mike Hudack wrote:
They have disabled their aggregation functionality entirely for the time
being. I just got off the phone with their CEO, who was very contrite.
We'll be meeting with them next week to figure out how to do this right,
and allow people to opt in and out from blip using MediaRSS.
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
Vlogger CC Licenses
Mike Hudack wrote:
They have disabled their aggregation functionality entirely for the
time being. I just got off the phone with their CEO, who
was very
Den 04.01.2007 kl. 16:20 skrev Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's correct. The problem is that we do want to be picky. We want to
allow people to use VPIP to play back videos hosted on blip, but we
don't want to allow them to use the MyHeavy player on MyHeavy.com
(unless it's the content
Thanks Mike!
On Jan 4, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Mike Hudack wrote:
Yup, it looks like they've cleaned their act up. I'm expecting a call
from their CEO in a few minutes, so I'm guessing that will be the
message he delivers.
--
Steve Garfield
http://SteveGarfield.com
.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WWWhatsup
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 2:28 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding
Vlogger CC
to discuss these very issues. It's time for the crowd to recommend
solutions. MyHeavy is now willing to play ball by your rules. Write
the rules. I'll convey them.
OK, the first rule is:
If you used content without permission of the owner you have to pay
the owner's asking price
I can see where you are coming from with that sugestion, but it seems
a tad OTT to me and would possibly harm the ability of a concensus
forming around these 'rules'?
Another problem with it is the concept of using something 'without
permission'. At the heart of the abuses we have seen, is the
comments below
On 1/4/07, johnleeke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to discuss these very issues. It's time for the crowd to recommend
solutions. MyHeavy is now willing to play ball by your rules. Write
the rules. I'll convey them.
OK, the first rule is:
If you used content without
How it works in the courts...
I did a bit of research as to how it works in the courts.
There are 2 main parts:
1) Did they violate someone's copyright? (YES in this case)
2) Were there damages to the copyright holder?
If the 2 conditions are met, the court then decides an appropriate
Den 04.01.2007 kl. 23:18 skrev cooper3acd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How it works in the courts...
I did a bit of research as to how it works in the courts.
There are 2 main parts:
1) Did they violate someone's copyright? (YES in this case)
2) Were there damages to the copyright holder?
If the 2
On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been following this post. Fascinating stuff. Sull, Jay, Mike H,
Enric... and everyone who's posted you all rock!
I'm so glad we're getting beyond the knee jerk reaction and into the
nitty gritty.
I read every single comment in both
On 1/4/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that Referer and User Agent headers are arbitrary and it
would be less than trivial for a myheavy.com site to identify itself as
blip.tv or vPIP respectively. If it wanted to.
But then it would be doing fraud or
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The action, reaction on this list was amazing:
I agree, I'm REALLY proud that we all stuck together on this... that's
what a community is all about.
Group hug,
Casey
---
http://www.galacticast.com/
Best here
http://www.tiny.cc/d2dYz
Loiez
Le 4 janv. 07 à 19:37, Loiez D. a écrit :
Hi all,
The french press is talking about MyHeavy
http://www.pointblog.com/past/2007/01/04/
myheavy_ne_respecte_pas_les_vloggers.htm
Pointblog is one of the most important blog in France
Nice day ;-)
They're almost certainly pulling the videos out of my blip.tv feed,
since there's videos on there that are only on blip.tv and not on my
videoblogs. This is not good. What shall we do?
-- Enric
-==-
http://www.cirne.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL
They appear to have every video posted to blip, no matter how obscure.
They're just grabbing video from everywhere they can.
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're almost certainly pulling the videos out of my blip.tv feed,
since there's videos on there that are only on blip.tv
, just as we always
have before.
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enric
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 6:39 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC Licenses
myheavy.com also pulling videos I've posted on google video.
-- Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not good!!
wtf?
is it only blip videos?
funny:
http://www.myheavy.com/static.php?page=copyright
On 1/3/07, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep. They have 14 of my videos that I've found so far. I'm watching one right
now.
It's playing about 280 width, when I built it @ 480 width.
There's a tag under my video announcing the episode title that's just about as
big as the
size they're showing my video.
Above it and to the left,
http://www.myheavy.com/static.php?page=copyright
LOL
On 1/3/07, Ronen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They appear to have every video posted to blip, no matter how obscure.
They're just grabbing video from everywhere they can.
On 1/3/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're almost
my Blip videos as well.. hmm
just what I like to see.. an ad w/ a 1/2 naked chick tacked on to a video of
my 2yr old son..
-Chris
On 1/3/07, Ronen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They appear to have every video posted to blip, no matter how obscure.
They're just grabbing video from everywhere
:39 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
CC Licenses
They're almost certainly pulling the videos out of my blip.tv
feed, since there's videos on there that are only on blip.tv
and not on my
I just emailed them a bill for $68,000.00. It was an arbitrary number
I pulled out of my head.
Think they'll pay?
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
my Blip videos as well.. hmm
just what I like to see.. an ad
Well, they appear to be illegally using all my stuff from Blip and
Google. All of my stuff is copyrighted and most even has copyright
notice in the descriptions that display on their site and right in the
video itself.
Plus they are displaying half naked women next to my video, an
association
picture a heavy sumo wrestler sitting on your head.
there's your answer.
;)
On 1/3/07, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just emailed them a bill for $68,000.00. It was an arbitrary number
I pulled out of my head.
Think they'll pay?
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
---
Yeah, as soon as they take my option to negotiate licensing fees with me.
I'm waiting on my weatherman buddy to tell me there's snow in Hell, too.
--
Rhett.
http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime
I just emailed them a bill for $68,000.00. It was an arbitrary number
I pulled out of my head.
i call major BULLSHIT!
this makes me mad.
they are re-hosting videos in flash on their servers
with their watermark!!!
no links back to the blogs or the blip pages.
lots of crappy ads, the one i saw was a full page animation that 'played'
before my video.
total disrespect for creative commons.
There were times over the holidays that I felt like I had a sumo
wrestler sitting on my head. Does that still count?
It sucks when this happens. I have a feeling that it's going to become
more often than not now.
So...are we all going to have to keep a lawyer on retainer now? Geez.
David
Plus they are stamping their logo right on top of my video.
Absolutely reprehensible !
John
http://heavypr.wordpress.com/2006/11/21/online-media-daily-101206/
BROADBAND VIDEO SITE HEAVY.COM WEDNESDAY unveiled its newest channel,
Heavy's Angels,
featuring clips submitted by 20 female video creators. The 20 selected
angels were among hundreds of applicants who submitted original videos to
On 1/3/07, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just emailed them a bill for $68,000.00. It was an arbitrary number
I pulled out of my head.
This is exactly how I feel about it. I want some retroactive payment
for my work from heavy.com.
And Mike Hudack: any money I get back goes to you
Good catch Casey, I'm emailing them now as all my shows are on there
as well.
Rev.
Cultofuhf.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
We found out today that MyHeavy.com has been re-posting our videos
with a huge pre-roll banner ad and a
Sweet. Maybe they will actually pay my $68,000.00 bill I sent them then!
(and then David woke up to the smell of tasty tasty pizza)
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Chris Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What Schlomo sed. Their site is so advertisement intensive. It's mo'
like oh my heavy ads, using work that's not their own. Ad salesmen who
want to keep everything for myheavy.com.
Maybe Google and others can get into the fray.
Francisco
franciscodaum.blogspot.com
--- In
How many of these kinds of 'businesses' can media creators handle and
still participate and/or eek out a living?
How many of these kinds of 'businesses' can Mike Blip take on from
a legal standpoint?
How did the clowns that run Myheavy.com get a buy in from Cingular
for advertising?
This
Done. I wrote them letting them know they are violating the CC license
I placed on my work, requested them to stop or be resposnsible for
their breaking the law. I hope they don't spam the hell out me now.
What crooks.
Francisco Daum
franciscodaum.blogspot.com
--- In
Where do they get the money for them fancy prizes?
When you are spending $12.3 million of other people's money I guess
you can afford to do what ever you damn well please, including steal
other people's content to impress your investors!
Forget posting messages to MyHeavy, post your messages
Why don't we spam them w/ anti MyHeavy.com videos..
On 1/3/07, francisco_daum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done. I wrote them letting them know they are violating the CC license
I placed on my work, requested them to stop or be resposnsible for
their breaking the law. I hope they don't spam
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed Jan 03 21:14:46 2007
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger CC Licenses
Why don't we spam them w/ anti MyHeavy.com videos..
On 1/3/07, francisco_daum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done. I wrote them letting them know they are violating
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger CC
Licenses
How many of these kinds of 'businesses' can media creators handle and
still participate and/or eek out a living?
How many of these kinds of 'businesses' can Mike Blip take on from
a legal standpoint
I've placed a phone call to them and expect a call back first thing
tomorrow morning (it's already 7PM in New York and it seems like the
responsible party has gone home for the day). I'll be calling back
first thing tomorrow if I don't hear.
We'll take care of this to the best of our
Lol, that'd be funny.
Robyn
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mike Hudack
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:23 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger CC
Licenses
I've been
Sull has blogged about this and I have dugg it on digg:
http://digg.com/tech_news/MyHeavy_Stealing_Works_Without_Permission
Let's get the story out and put pressure on them to rectify their mistake.
Mike- Thanks for everything you're doing to protect our licenses... we
love you, you sexy man
Forget posting messages to MyHeavy, post your messages where the
investors will see them.
John is right.everyone should blog about it.
this is your power.
this is also how we all can educate...
we can also point to these blog posts in future incidents.
anyone have an old Veoh post when
IANAL, but there seems two aspects to the actions of sites like Heavy.com:
- Thievery or stealing of material
- Breaking of copyright contract
The DMCA section 512 safe harbor protects service providers if a
customer puts up copyrighted material as long as the service provider
has the
, January 03, 2007 9:15 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger CC
Licenses
Why don't we spam them w/ anti MyHeavy.com videos..
On 1/3/07, francisco_daum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:francisco_daum%40yahoo.com wrote:
Done. I wrote
I agree that we should blog about this, but I also feel they should
not get the traffic... so perhaps we shouldn't link to them.
I really wish we all had lawyers right now.
Casey
---
http://www.galacticast.com/
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two words for that: class action
;)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that we should blog about this, but I also feel they should
not get the traffic... so perhaps we shouldn't link to them.
I really wish we all had lawyers right now.
I'd really be upset if it had more views than mine over at Blip... not
that it would be all that hard ;o)
Jarod.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two words for that: class action
;)
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Casey McKinnon
As someone who has, of his own violition, posted content on MyHeavy
(and, probably, every other site that hosts stuff) I can only
report that in my limited experience it's (mostly) a
pseudo-user-generated cheesecake site.
There is little visibility for anything other than the pseudo-vlogs of
dugg!
On Jan 3, 2007, at 6:44 PM, Casey McKinnon wrote:
Sull has blogged about this and I have dugg it on digg:
http://digg.com/tech_news/MyHeavy_Stealing_Works_Without_Permission
Let's get the story out and put pressure on them to rectify their
mistake.
Mike- Thanks for everything
On 1/3/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been thinking about redirecting all requests for blip videos from
myheavy to a video about blip. If the problem isn't fixed tomorrow we will do
just that.
My impression from Ryanne's comment that they're superimposing their
logo is that
i sent a message from their site contact form and selected business
inquiry as the category
got a quick reply back (surprise!)
as usual, they expect me to identify the vids
i asked them to remove any vid that was in their database and on my
site or pay $250/video :)
jeez,
markus
From:
And I'll raise you, dugg, blogged and twittered. ;)
Robyn
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Markus Sandy
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 10:20 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger
I just wrote a blog post about it here:
http://www.galacticast.com/2007/01/03/on-notice-myheavycom/
Here is a copy of the letter I sent to MyHeavy:
Subject: Notice of Copyright Infringement
Dear MyHeavy,
I wish to inform you that you have been illegally re-posting our
content on
Fellow Vloggers:
Myheavy.com is clearly aware of copyright laws, even as it apparently
disregards those laws. Click on the ³Copyright Tips² link at the bottom of
its main page and you will read in part:
³When we find out you have posted a video that's infringing someone's
copyright content,
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
