Can someone explain me what could be the link between Debye temperature and
LENR.
It is said tha this temperature match athe maximum energy level of normal
phonons...
So when Defkalion said that the minimum temperature is Debye temp, it imply
that abnormal phonons energy level are required ?
I
Why-oh-why don't they have a heat engine on the output? (Or heat pump + heat
engine.)
With roughly 10 kW out, I'm quite sure it wouldn't be impossible to create the
necessary 220 VAC @ 2.5 kW input.
Just switch over from Mains when the reactor is fairly stable @ COP=4.
What can I say.
: (
http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v8/n5/full/nnano.2013.69.html?WT.ec_id=NNANO-201305
Direct observation and dynamics of spontaneous skyrmion-like magnetic
domains in a ferromagnet
The skyrmion-like magnetic domains appear as clusters above the Curie
temperature. We found that the repeated
on his blog, Matt lewans report what Defkalion CTO said
http://matslew.wordpress.com/2013/07/24/comments-on-defkalion-reactor-demo-in-milan/
according to CTO John Hadjichristos there are HUGE magnetic fields inside
the reactor as a result of the reaction, in the order of 1 Tesla if I
remember
Dear Sunil, judge realisically, they are stillo under way
and going very fast. I have personal experience in RD
nd I feel empathy for them and I understand that not everything
can be perfect at once,
Peter
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Sunil Shah s.u.n@hotmail.com wrote:
Why-oh-why
Yiannis said this concerning the mismatch between HV measurement:
For the HV power:one had to calculate also its duty cycle (approx 20%).
There were some mistakes done during this demo (at conditions never before
experienced). The most serious was done by the observer Matts Lawen who
caused a
The details are secret but the technological principles
as *make hydrogen active and nickel reactive* were
published by DGT and on my blog.
The devil is in the details indeed but the angel is
in the basic principles.
Peter
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:40 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
You bring up an interesting point Robin. Does anyone know of the exact
location of the Tout test point? I am wondering whether this is measuring the
temperature of a metallic path to the device or just the water outlet. My
suspicion is that the water is being ejected from the cooling tube by
The timing of this action speaks volumes to me. I hope this is not indicative
of what we can expect to see in the future.
Mark[mg], I wish you well and thank you for your brave reporting about a
subject that apparently hits some raw nerves.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones
Dear Mark,
You are always (and now especially) welcome with
an guest editorial on the Blog Ego Out.
However I predict you are only a temporary martyr
of the LENR oppression. Truth will triumph.
Peter
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:11 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The timing of this
Axil, where did you see reference to the DGT device magnetic fields causing
disruptions to nearby equipment? That would be extremely important if true.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Jul 24, 2013 1:25 am
It would be a bit more tricky than what you imagine. Matching the exact power
output with the required input would take quite a lot of extra effort and
energy storage. Think of a balancing act.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Sunil Shah s.u.n@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l
It's too bad that this putative magnetic field was not shown with a
magnetometer.
Many physicists would have considered a large magnetic field to be better
proof than the heat. actually FAR BETTER proof in the unusual combination,
since it would validate a more nebulous thermal gain with an
Inquiring minds want to hear more!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Jul 24, 2013 1:34 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?)
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, July
Good point Eric. But keep in mind that a Faraday shield would not stop a
magnetic field. They can eliminate electrostatic fields, but not magnetic ones
unless the field is at a very high frequency. This is an important piece of
the puzzle if true.
Dave
-Original Message-
From:
I find this an interesting subject to pursue. Another possibility is that
there is some form of magnetic feedback of a positive nature. In this case, a
small region of magnetic field causes a larger field to be generated by its
interaction and so on until a very large one appears which might
I recall seeing Mats connecting the ground of his scope to the center pin on
occasions. He appeared to perform this test with a loop available which would
intercept any magnetic fields passing by the area. I used to do this type of
measurement to search for RF fields that would induce a
Jones, nice factoid, I never considered ionic current of hydrogen in redundant
ground states (which have accentuated magnetic properties due to inverse
square) would result in huge magnetic fields. Defkalion clearly has a thermal
gradient between the material warmed by heaters and the area
The magnetic fields may be very high frequent which will cause eddy
currents in the shielding plates, creating counter magnetic fields,
resulting in strongly reduced magnetic interference. In that sence
shielding will work.
Op woensdag 24 juli 2013 schreef David Roberson (dlrober...@aol.com) het
I use a couple of magnetometer apps for my iPhone. One even logs data for
emailing and running FFTs in Excel
SensorScope for IPhone
MagnetMeter
It goes wild during thunderstorms.
Stewart
On Wednesday, July 24, 2013, Jones Beene wrote:
It’s too bad that this putative magnetic field was not
Most interesting Stewart, since someone present may have actually documented
the magnetic field from a known (estimated) distance, thus allowing a decent
calculation of the internal field.
This is reminiscent of the streaking asteroid in Russia recently - which was
caught on hundreds of dash cams
John H stated that these DGT device magnetic fields will cause disruptions
to nearby equipment in the demo introduction on Tuesday.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Axil, where did you see reference to the DGT device magnetic
fields causing
Very easy to do. The app has to be running to collect data and measures uT
mag fields in x, y z. You then email the data file to a PC. Excel has a
FFT data analysis add-in library to run the spectrum analysis. Also logs
gravitational acceleration in x,y,z just in case that thing is
warping
The hydrogen molecule is usually diamagnetic and that would be in the
s-orbital state.
It would be interesting to know - even without invoking f/H or the Mills'
hydrino, if the p-orbital state of molecular hydrogen has enhanced magnetic
susceptibility or not. Logic would seem to dictate that it
Why a Faraday cage when Faraday cages do not block magnetic, but
electromagnetic, phenomena?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
on his blog, Matt lewans report what Defkalion CTO said
It doesn't make sense to call them magnetic rather than electromagnetic
fields if the variation in the magnetic field is rapid. Moreover, a mere
magnetic field is not going to disrupt electronics in general -- its EM
fields that do that.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Teslaalset
If memory serves without going back to the demo archives, John H said that
the iron outer box was part of the EMF containment system.
Wouldn’t an iron box shield magnetism?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:51 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Why a Faraday cage when Faraday cages do not
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Brad Lowe: It was reported that the nickel isotopes all react, except that
Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?)
61Ni is the only naturally occurring NI isotope with odd spin (and hence a
nuclear magnetic moment).
The more logical
Near fields behave quite a bit differently than far fields. You can have a
near field with a magnetic component that is far higher than that of a standard
electromagnetic radiation condition. This seemed strange when I first
encountered it, but made a lot of sense after looking into the
Copy of my response elsewhere:
The magnetic fields may be very high frequent which will cause eddy
currents in the shielding plates, creating counter magnetic fields,
resulting in strongly reduced magnetic interference. In that sence
shielding will work.
Op woensdag 24 juli 2013 schreef Axil
I believe this is true in many cases Axil. The external magnetic flux
components would be diverted to travel within the strongly magnetic material
and around things within that box. There are special metals that are used for
this purpose in sensitive systems.
Dave
-Original
The plasma control technique used by DGT appears to be quite a bit different
than what Rossi is doing with his device. We should all be excited to find
that there are several different techniques that yield excess heat.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
There might well be a LENR reaction strength component to this even isotope
issue.
The DGT reactor might well produce a stronger reaction intensity that can
crack upon open the Ni58 and Ni60 isotopes that the weaker Rossi reaction
cannot do.
If a reactor with a stronger reaction is invented,
You can bet your eye teeth that Rossi et al are trying to duplicate the
spark control mechanism that DGT is currently demonstrating. In this LENR
activation area, DGT is ahead in the LENR technology race and Rossi wants
it badly.
It reminds me of what the competition was like between Jobs and
And HP Dell ended up selling the most PC's...
I predict this quantum rabbit is just beginning to multiply
Stewart
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
You can bet your eye teeth that Rossi et al are trying to duplicate the
spark control mechanism that DGT is
From: David Roberson
The plasma control technique used by DGT appears to be quite
a bit different than what Rossi is doing with his device. We should all be
excited to find that there are several different techniques that yield
excess heat.
Well, at least you went out with a bang!
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Following my last post to my blog on Forbes (
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/07/23/defkalion-demonstrates-lenr-live-right-now/)
my tenure with that
Point taken about the Faraday cage (I have not heard the original reference, so
I am going on hearsay).
After I thought about it, I suspect any shielding would be for low-level x-ray
and gamma radiation rather than to protect electronics.
Eric
On Jul 24, 2013, at 7:19, David Roberson
Just since some here might like to know. I was just issued a patent (
http://www.patentgenius.com/patent/8485791.html )
(This makes 6 useless CF patents for me . But the point is it can be done, but
that by the time they get through the PTO, what is left is gutted beyond
recognition)
It is
The grounded thick stainless steel container, mu metal, and outer metal
insulated box should act as a cage for the Defkalion demo.
I expect there was EMI from their HV supply
D2
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?)
From: eric.wal...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 24 Jul
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-07/24/cold-fusion/viewgallery/306439
...
Mats Lewan acted as an independent observer of the Defkalion demonstration; he
gives a full account on his blog. His view is that is appears to be genuine,
producing 5.5 kilowatts of heat from a 2.7-kilowatt
wired UK cover ICCF18 and Defkalion test, quite negatively but not too much
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-07/24/cold-fusion
The name should either be FPP (scientific name) or CF (colloquial name).
Not enough is known about the FPP at present to limit the phenomenon to
even condensed matter. Until nuclear products are accepted by the wider
scientific community, nor is low energy nuclear reaction a good scientific
From: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 2:06:19 PM
wired UK cover ICCF18 and Defkalion test, quite negatively but not too much
Given the recent job security (not a conspiracy theory of course) .. I'd hedge
my bets too.
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
We had the fortune to be in direct Skype chat contact with Mats Lewin
during the experiment and it was definitely live, we were able to ask Mats
to pose questions . . .
I heard about that after it happened. The MFMP people have a good
impression.
I was
Why do you claim that Defkalion did not have extensive 3rd party tests?
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
From: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:50:50 PM
Why do you claim that Defkalion did not have extensive 3rd party tests?
They announced them (back when they had a blog), and they released one
inconclusive report (with redacted names),
ISTR with some
They announced them (back when they had a blog), and they released
one inconclusive report (with redacted names),
ISTR with some gummint-lab related people acting on their own behalf.
Listed here : October 22, 2012 :
Earlier today I got the following eMail post from Dr. Mill's Yahoo
SocietyforCalssicalPhysics group. Someone queried Dr. Mills about the
following:
Dr. Mills,
What is your take on the Defkalion demo that was put on-line? Is BLP
You underestimate them! ;)
2013/7/24 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
They announced them (back when they had a blog), and they released
one inconclusive report (with redacted names),
ISTR with some gummint-lab related people acting on their own behalf.
Listed here : October 22, 2012 :
So you have inside information that is not an estimate but a measurement?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
You underestimate them! ;)
2013/7/24 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
They announced them (back when they had a blog), and they released
one
One nuclear technology that TerraPower most likely won’t be pursuing is
fusion.
“I have a soft spot in my heart for fusion, *having run the ITER
program*and things like that, but it’s something I can’t count on for
my
grandchildren,” said Gilleland, whose background includes having served as
U.S.
Does he say why he can't count on ITER?
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you claim that Defkalion did not have extensive 3rd party tests?
Perhaps they have. I do not have any information on this, or any test
results. Perhaps they have had tests under NDAs.
- Jed
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:39:38 -0700:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Brad Lowe: It was reported that the nickel isotopes all react, except that
Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?)
61Ni is the only naturally occurring NI
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps they have. I do not have any information on this, or any test
results. Perhaps they have had tests under NDAs.
I recall claims to the effect that they have some big partnerships underway
or under the works.
Alan Fletcher quoted MFMP:
We had the fortune to be in direct Skype chat contact with Mats Lewin
during the experiment and it was definitely live, we were able to ask Mats
to pose questions, challenges and do additional testing during the run and
saw near real time responses including watching
Since exceeding the Debye temperature of nickel appears to be necessary to
produce heat from Ni-H systems, I was wondering if the Debye temperature of
palladium must be exceeded too in Pd systems. I did a search for the Debye
of temperature of palladium and found this abstract from 1966:
My dear friends,
I have just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/defkalion-has-kept-its-promise.html
Good news coming...
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Very well said, Peter.
I think it's easy to underestimate how intimidating it is to go on a
globally streamed demonstration like this in front of your peers and to do
that well unless you are deeply confident in what you are showing.
Anyways, I do agree however that this was a demo and not a
60 matches
Mail list logo
