Re: [Vo]:the essence of the 1MW, 1year test

gh I think the Lugano test provides quite a bit of evidence. * *Craig* On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/09/sep-22-2016-lenr- > finding-essence-of-1mw.html > > quite good info.. > > peter > &

Re: [Vo]:Interesting Steam Calculation

, then I wouldn't rule for Rossi on this issue. But otherwise, don't put me on a jury and expect unwritten assumptions to be honored. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Interesting Steam Calculation

endent evaluation or opting out if he disagrees with the final report. His saving grace may be that Rossi is looking like a fraud with the information we've currently seen; and that may not go unnoticed by the court. Craig

Re: [Vo]:The "customer" warehouse

That the client is no longer in business at the end of the 350 day test, is telling... Craig On 08/14/2016 09:11 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: Here a picture and information about the "customer" warehouse. It is only 6000 square feet and the height is 20 feet. Let's do a Fer

Re: [Vo]:angry and sad LENR comment but info too!

take it on faith that what appears to be an objective Universe, with rules which are the same for everyone, is true. Craig Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proofs. Your metaphysical claims demand more than intellectual wankerism. I'm not making an extraordinary claim. You

Re: [Vo]:angry and sad LENR comment but info too!

On 08/11/2016 05:47 PM, Che wrote: On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com <mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com>> wrote: Actually, you have to have faith in an objective Universe. Craig Having faith in things which can be prove

Re: [Vo]:angry and sad LENR comment but info too!

>>>The word "faithful" has no place in science or engineering. - Jed Actually, you have to have faith in an objective Universe. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

lly expected. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Another motion filed in Rossi suit

No way Rossi's actions are fraud, from reselling the licensing, (unless he has a known faulty product). The best IH can hope for is a null contract; not the rights to the IP. On 07/01/2016 03:59 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: It is interesting and self-destructive that Rossi appears to have

Re: [Vo]:Back to the drawing board

g inside the SunCell. This doesn't make sense because Mills has a theory which explains precisely how much energy and power he expects to generate in each experiment. He couldn't have made a mistake like this. Surely he has compared his experimental results with his theoretical results. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Back to the drawing board

. To me, this really makes him look bad. If he's legitimate, he needs to push this new discovery aside, and get something out as soon as possible to maintain any kind of credibility. Craig On 06/17/2016 04:06 PM, Craig Haynie wrote: This is discouraging. What makes Mills special is that he

Re: [Vo]:Back to the drawing board

am at a loss as to how he could have discovered another amazing energy source without using theory. Craig On 06/17/2016 03:57 PM, Axil Axil wrote: From the quote, that is a conclusion that is now coming out of BLP. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.

Re: [Vo]:Back to the drawing board

Axil, are you saying that Mills' theory, which he has used to develop this process, has now failed him and can no longer explain it? Craig On 06/17/2016 03:38 PM, Axil Axil wrote: R, Mills has alway asserted that the energy that he sees in his experiments were based on CHEMICAL processes

RE: [Vo]:ecatnews.com closes

"ecatnews.com closes".Agreed.  The eCat is as dead as a short-sighted mouse who's just mistakenly walked into a cats only nightclub during a time of extreme famine. Original Message Subject: [Vo]:ecatnews.com closes From: Jed Rothwell Date: Wed, June 15,

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

e failures, and no recent success. I read this to refer to the individual small reactors that were part of the larger 1MW reactor. Craig

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

for that? For a solution to be correct, all the pieces have to fit into place, and if money wasn't a factor in this, then things just don't all fit together for me. I know we'll have more information as time goes on. I'm happy waiting for it. Craig

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

. Craig

Re: [Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

There's nothing in the dispute which hinges on whether the device works, or not. That point may never be brought up. Craig On 06/03/2016 10:04 AM, a.ashfield wrote: IH has apparently sent Krivit a copy of their legal response to the court case. From a quick scan it doesn’t look like

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

>>>It seems that there would be a way to test the hypothesis that grays are living under the White House and get some hard data. Why would you want to? Craig On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Steph

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

Learned something new today. What are "grays"? https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/92/65/96/926596fc73fadc74a03a639b60968884.jpg Craig

Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

else at this point, to allow them to draw any of their own conclusions, then this could only hurt Rossi's case in court. Why Darden signed that document, is beyond me. It makes him look like a fool. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

WHAT? Sorry, but this isn't what I quoted. Something is playing tricks. Nevermind... Craig On 05/16/2016 07:03 PM, Craig Haynie wrote: On 05/16/2016 06:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: This building is 10,800 sq. ft. Not that it changes much, but according to Mats, the building was 1,000

Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test

-plus-more-updates/ Craig

Re: [Vo]:LENR and the feline nature of the E-Cat

e; nor did it allow them to certify, or reject, the evaluation of the EVR; and they agreed to Rossi's guy, Penon. Why? It doesn't make sense to me. It's not something that their lawyers should have allowed; nor something I would have agreed to, if I was Darden, unless I was certain of the outcome. Craig

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive Rises Above Pathoskeptic Dirge

h leads me to believe that no one even bothers to seriously talk to him. Has Eagleworks even flown him down to their lab to discuss this? Craig On 04/27/2016 06:32 PM, Russ George wrote: New Physics and the EM Drive is rising and illustrates the crisis in physics being experienced by the dogmat

Re: [Vo]:LIVE ON YOUTUBE: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project: *GlowStick* 5.3 - Ready to power climb

the temperature went above 1020c. The timing couldn't really have been much better. This occurred at 2016-04-16 02:00 UTC. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUyWnN--u7M=youtu.be=13188 Craig On 04/16/2016 11:27 AM, Jones Beene wrote: This temperature differential is more meaningful than it seems since some

Re: [Vo]:LIVE ON YOUTUBE: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project: *GlowStick* 5.3 - Ready to power climb

The optical imager is typically reading between an 18c and 20c difference. Craig On 04/16/2016 11:03 AM, Eric Walker wrote: Interesting. I hope a post-run calibration shows that when the fuel is removed, the active and null outside temperatures return to one another to within experimental

Re: [Vo]:LIVE ON YOUTUBE: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project: *GlowStick* 5.3 - Ready to power climb

60c on the latest... https://youtu.be/VLK19pllG9g?t=6278 On 04/16/2016 10:53 AM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:01 AM, CB Sites > wrote: I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they had a delta T of 30C

Re: [Vo]:LIVE ON YOUTUBE: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project: *GlowStick* 5.3 - Ready to power climb

difference is between 3 and 4 standard deviations from the calibration, and 60c, (which occured for a few minutes), is over 4 standard deviations from the calibration. Is this the correct way to calculate error? Craig On 04/16/2016 09:15 AM, Craig Haynie wrote: Now 60c On 04/16/2016 07:19 AM

Re: [Vo]:LIVE ON YOUTUBE: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project: *GlowStick* 5.3 - Ready to power climb

Now 60c On 04/16/2016 07:19 AM, Craig Haynie wrote: Now 50c. On 04/16/2016 03:01 AM, CB Sites wrote: I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they had a delta T of 30C between a fueled and unfueled cell that lasted for hours, until I gave up. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2

Re: [Vo]:LIVE ON YOUTUBE: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project: *GlowStick* 5.3 - Ready to power climb

Now 50c. On 04/16/2016 03:01 AM, CB Sites wrote: I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they had a delta T of 30C between a fueled and unfueled cell that lasted for hours, until I gave up. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Che

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]: Rossi: 1MW Plant Customer Bought Three More Plants

be qualified to make that determination is Barry West, and I don't know who he is. The other thing that confuses me, is why did IH send out that rather pessimistic release on Mar 10, before they had any report to view? It's not that clear cut to me. Craig On 04/15/2016 03:51 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> It is for the courts to decide whether the omission of a clause like this >>> prevents the application of common sen

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> IH had already paid Rossi $11.5 million, and Rossi had already given IH >> his IP. >> > > I.H. says the device does n

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

er side would have the option to opt-out if they didn't like the report. IH had already paid Rossi $11.5 million, and Rossi had already given IH his IP. Both sides had reasons to compel the other to the completion of the contract. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > > Some people have said that Penon is the sole ERV author listed in the > contract and therefore whatever he says must be accepted by both sides. > Last year I.H. said they would abide by whatever he said, so now

Re: [Vo]:Rossi states his reason for not publishing Penon report

This is a good point. IH can just as easily release the report. It's not just Rossi's reluctance. Craig On 04/13/2016 06:08 PM, a.ashfield wrote: Jed, If the ERV report supports IH, why have they not released it?

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

statement on March 10, 19 days before Rossi received the results of the ERV test. This is why I think that IH simply didn't raise enough money to justify the commitment. The money they have isn't theirs to spend, if it's investor money from investors who weren't taking this risk. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

t; https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/test-of-e-cat-october-6.pdf Craig

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

On 04/12/2016 07:59 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com <mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com>> wrote: The legal case does not hinge on whether the device works. As the agreement is worded, IH pays IF and WHEN the ERV signs a document tha

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

, since he signed the agreement). There is no need to determine if the device actually works, for Rossi to win his lawsuit. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

irm in writing the Guaranteed Performance." I don't see where IH has the authority under the agreement to make any kind of judgment on the report. Craig On 04/10/2016 10:37 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Rossi also wants his intellectual property back. Last year, IH filed a patent on Rossi's technology. Craig On 04/10/2016 09:47 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com <mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote: IH is now being discarded, If he is discarding I.H. why

Re: [Vo]:Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

g through this one-year test, which took time and effort. Craig On 04/10/2016 03:17 PM, Brad Lowe wrote: And if I were 'there', I'd too be calling for different testing.

Re: [Vo]:Selective memories IH selected and agreed to the team to test the E-Cat

why wait an entire year to mention it -- and where did they mention this? Everything I've read indicates that they agreed to the test, agreed to the ERV, and decided afterwards, by some other means, that it couldn't be shown to work. Craig

Re: [Vo]:I.H. press release responding to Rossi

that party was chosen, then it looks like they have to pay up if the report is positive, and meets the required specifications. There doesn't appear to be an option to decline, at this point. Craig On 04/10/2016 10:30 AM, Eric Walker wrote: On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Teslaalset

[Vo]:Industrial Heat Patent?

d to them in this deal which IH did not finalize, then this would explain why Rossi is suing, instead of just letting it go. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

made by IH." http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892 Craig On 04/07/2016 09:56 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Robert Dorr <rod...@comcast.net <mailto:rod...@comcast.net>> wrote: I keep seeing that supposedly I.H. was the one that built the e-cat used in the Lugano

Re: [Vo]:I.H. press release responding to Rossi

massive parallel reactors, he must be on shoe strings. Rossi: " Yes, Leonardo Corporation has the financial resources necessary to make the massive production we need." http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892=88#comments Craig

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

On 04/07/2016 09:36 PM, Jones Beene wrote: *From:*Craig Haynie ØThey also paid Rossi $10 million dollars, after validating that the device was working… Not exactly. The logical error is cause and effect. Yes, they paid the installment, but elsewhere they clearly state that "Indus

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

al and pay the $89 million, but I think it's quite likely that they didn't raise as much money as they thought they would during this past year, and had to bail on the agreement. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

. Then I understand, from the license agreement, that the money was released to Rossi. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

You're right. I have made two mistakes in two days. Something's wrong. I'm just not concentrating on what I'm writing. :) Craig On 04/07/2016 07:54 PM, Robert Dorr wrote: It wasn't a month long test, it was a 24 hour test performed in Ferrara Italy. I keep seeing that supposedly I.H

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

They also paid Rossi $10 million dollars after validating that the device was working for a month. Craig On 04/07/2016 06:54 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: "Industrial Heat has worked for over three years to substantiate the results claimed by Mr. Rossi from the E-Cat technology – all wi

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor Sues Industrial Heat, LLC.

I agree; the $10 million was paid. Sorry for the confusion. On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> See section 3.2(b).

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor Sues Industrial Heat, LLC.

See section 3.2(b). The $10,000,000 is held in escrow. http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0001.2.pdf On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > "I think the fight is over the $10

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor Sues Industrial Heat, LLC.

"...then Rossi would be smart to simply cancel IH's license and go for his own $500 billion IPO next month. Let IH sue him if they don't like the cancellation." I think the fight is over the $10 million in escrow, which looks like it may go back to IH if the deal falls through. Cr

Re: [Vo]:Rossi's customer

"‘The attached photo has been made in our factory in Miami, Florida, and is related to the plant “E-Cat the New Fire” manufactured by Leonardo Corporation to supply thermal energy’" From 2015: http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/05/05/new-image-of-the-e-cat-plant-on-trademark-applicati

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor Sues Industrial Heat, LLC.

Actually, this whole mystery could be the result of a failure by IH to raise the expected $89 million to finalize the deal. This might explain why they took this to the end of the trial. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Open Letter from Brian Ahern

tatus, were routinely reported to DARDEN, VAUGHN, IH and IPH by ROSSI, the ERV and IH/IPH's agents Mr. Fabiani and Mr. V/est." Craig

Re: [Vo]:Open Letter from Brian Ahern

And the winner is Jone Beene!! "I have recently re-read the Pinon report, which is an absolute mockery of the scientific system, and if Pinon turns out to be the ERV, then we are in the early stages of a gigantic lawsuit. " Craig On 03/31/2016 08:54 PM, Jones Beene wrote

Re: [Vo]:E-Cat THrust....EmDrive

This doesn't make any sense. If there was some kind of thrust being developed in the ecat, along the lines of the emdrive, then no one would ever know. If no one tries to measure it, they'll never see it, or suspect it. Craig On 04/04/2016 10:00 AM, Ron Kita wrote: Greetings Vortex-L, I

Re: [Vo]:Open Letter from Brian Ahern

have people who've purchased these machines, come out in unison that they're all amazed at how much money they're saving. Neither Rossi, nor Mills, seem to be interested in the former. Craig On 03/31/2016 07:35 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com <mailto:cchay

Re: [Vo]:Open Letter from Brian Ahern

year warranty. Craig On 03/31/2016 06:53 PM, Jones Beene wrote: Craig, Mills has been planning to "get to market sometime next year" for the last 20 years. Yawn. I hope he does, but there is not proof that he can do it. Sure, if Rossi gets to market first - fine ... no one

Re: [Vo]:Open Letter from Brian Ahern

Rossi has released a lot more than Mills, and they both seem to be on similar paths. Like Rossi, Mills is planning to start selling next year. If Rossi starts selling, that will be all the proof he needs. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Rossi and IH have received the ERV Report

This won't be resolved completely until Rossi sells a few of these things. Craig On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the thought provoking post… I agree. > > Group think and consensus can be more powerful, more wide

Re: [Vo]:The Orbo Works as Claimed?

This is an interesting video. He takes a load off of the Orbo, and watches the voltage increase. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UbKcgyCVzI#t=14.024172 Craig On 03/28/2016 10:33 PM, Craig Haynie wrote: http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/03/29/ecw-orbo-testing-week-8-orbo-cell-now-behaving

[Vo]:The Orbo Works as Claimed?

http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/03/29/ecw-orbo-testing-week-8-orbo-cell-now-behaving-according-to-steorns-claims/ Craig

Re: [Vo]:Rossi Ecat Commercialization ..a Nice Website

Rossi is the man in the lead? Unless Mills is lying, he is miles ahead of Rossi. If this is the case, then all Mills has to do is walk up and claim his Nobel prize. Craig On 03/25/2016 09:40 AM, Ron Kita wrote: Nice presentation..I almost missed it: http://newenergytreasure.com/2016/03/18

Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

at 200 m/s. When calculating the acceleration of a rocket, one doesn't use distance travelled. The calculation uses force multiplied by time. The acceleration doesn't drop off as the rocket increases in speed. Craig On 03/14/2016 12:17 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Craig Haynie

Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

ergy, over a given period of time, simply because it's moving, would violate Einstein's Special Relativity which says there's no preferred frame of reference. The moving object cannot be said to be moving at all. Craig On 03/13/2016 02:27 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote: Shawyer's theory explicitly

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive(s)

One advantage the EMDrive has over LENR, is that it's fairly replicable. The amateurs can do it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbf7735o3hQ Craig

Re: [Vo]:Statement from Industrial Heat

Reading between the lines... Does it sound like they're preparing us for a negative report on Rossi's one year test? Craig On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 11:32 -0500, Jed Rothwell wrote: > [Marianne Macy asked me to post this] > > > The following statement has been released from Ind

Re: [Vo]:a number (value) worth a million words for LENR

The number is a little too perfect, don't you think? 8,400,000 kwh / 350 days / 24 hours/day = exactly 1.000 mw of power output. Craig On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 19:57 +0200, Peter Gluck wrote: > > > do not take this literally > > > I bet we will have more info tomorrow o

Re: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?

On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 06:43 -0800, Jones Beene wrote: > What am I missing? > Gamma Rays! Craig

Re: [Vo]:Something big is happening

From: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project QuantumHeat.org [mailto:m.fleischmann.memor...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 7:13 PM To: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project QuantumHeat.org Subject: We. did. it... together. Dear Donor, During ICCF-17 in

Re: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

liticized. This goes to the heart of capitalism. Craig >

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power/ Brilliant Light...Demo today

thing can be verified. > This appears to be a staged production of no scientific value. It is > simply another PR event to raise funding. Yes, but it would still be fun to watch. I'm wondering if Mills is presenting a self-sustaining generator? Anything less would be disappointing at thi

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:NEW LIVE Steorn Webinars Announced - Product Demonstrations

"Energy is roughly 10Wh" They're saying it will self-recharge indefinitely. Craig On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Teslaalset <robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Price is 1200 Euro > Power generation is 0.4W > Energy is roughly 10Wh > Weight is 300 grams, most

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:NEW LIVE Steorn Webinars Announced - Product Demonstrations

"Perhaps the Steorn device also has a lithium battery to account for its higher cost." Yes, they said it has a lithium battery in their presentation. Supposedly, the battery recharges continuously. Craig On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Teslaalset <robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com&g

RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:NEW LIVE Steorn Webinars Announced - Product Demonstrations

015 at 22:30, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote:On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Craig Brown <cr...@overunity.co> wrote: > > Teaser PROMO for upcoming LIVE Steorn Free Energy Webinars featuring their > O-Cube > > ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3FmbNkfgS4 Retur

RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:NEW LIVE Steorn Webinars Announced - Product Demonstrations

e: Wed, October 28, 2015 3:41 pm To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Wow Craig, just read that the price of the O-Cube will be revealed today!I sincerely hope it's in the 100s to the 200 euros, rather than 500-1000-2000+ euros. as I seriously could maybe afford that if it's <200€.maybe.http://freeenergy.ne

RE: [Vo]:NEW LIVE Steorn Webinars Announced - Product Demonstrations

Webinars Announced - Product Demonstrations From: Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, October 23, 2015 5:30 am To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Craig Brown <cr...@overunity.co> wrote: > > Teaser PROMO fo

RE: [Vo]:NEW LIVE Steorn Webinars Announced - Product Demonstrations

Teaser PROMO for upcoming LIVE Steorn Free Energy Webinars featuring their O-Cubettps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3FmbNkfgS4 Original Message Subject: RE: [Vo]:NEW LIVE Steorn Webinars Announced - Product Demonstrations From: "Craig Brown" <cr...@overunity.

Re: [Vo]: Translation of Russian paper on Ni-H experiment

On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 17:26 -0400, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Note that this work was done in the 1990s, so it was not affected by > Rossi. The paper references work in the 90s, but the paper and the latest work, is current. Craig > >

Re: [Vo]:Re: Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through

What am I missing here? Is hydrogen not really necessary for this reaction? Then why was it considered so important? Craig On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. <hoyt-stea...@cox.net> wrote: > Add some BORAX to the water, I hear that's even better. > > -O

RE: [Vo]:NEW LIVE Steorn Webinars Announced - Product Demonstrations

Bit of News for you...Steorn will conduct a series of LIVE interactive Webinars beginning on October 28th.The webinars are an introduction to their free energy technology Orbo Powercube.They will demo the tech, explain how the components work and field questions.Link to register for the FREE Live

[Vo]:ADGEX Flashlight Creators Announce USB PowerBank

Remember those guys who said they had developed a flashlight powered by Earth's magnetic field? Well, here's the next product apparently.http://freeenergy.news/news/the-rapidly-self-charging-adgex-tachyon-powerbank/

RE: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again:

I think we could be seeing the first product hit the market by the end of the year - maybe a lot sooner.See one of my reports on this:http://freeenergy.news/steorn/pub-launch-for-steorns-orbo-powercube/Craig Original Message Subject: Re: [Vo]:STEORN in the news again: From: Analog

Re: [Vo]:A 21st Century Case for Gold: A New Information Theory of Money.

, but there is no causal link between the two. Free trade does not lead to mass surveillance, wars, and riot squads. He is, rather, equating a philosophy based on violence with a philosophy based on free trade, where no such relationship can be shown to exist. Craig

Re: [Vo]:A 21st Century Case for Gold: A New Information Theory of Money.

gold reserves from $20 / ounce to $35 / ounce. The Federal Reserve created a lot of money in the 1920s and much of it went into the stock market, driving prices to extraordinary levels, which had not been seen before that period in time. Craig

Re: [Vo]:A 21st Century Case for Gold: A New Information Theory of Money.

who want to see gold as money do so because they believe in a decentralized, universal, stable, currency, something no central bank can achieve. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Coal mining industry in steep decline

Electric cars in the 90s were only built as a result of the California mandate. There was no demand for them back then. Now, with improved technology, and much higher gas prices, a lot of people are starting to like the idea and the market is becoming viable. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Re: CIHT POWER SYSTEM (US20150171455A1, Publication Date: 06/18/2015, File Date: 05/21/2013, Mills)

, and his patent application is rejected, then I think he would have a strong legal case if someone tried to replicate it and distribute it. Craig

Re: [Vo]:a turning point in the history of Parkhomov replications

The MFMP data is really compelling. As the temperature rises; as the internal pressure drops, the difference between the fueled cell and the control gets wider. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/15ODbN9Oq6Pjyp9A61hdX0-fBJIXBBKMk7Ei06PzTc-Q/htmlview?sle=true#gid=1291075296 Craig On Sat

Re: [Vo]:OT fountain of youth?

everything cheap. Craig

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

Why concentrate upon a very special case instead of the more general applications for these drives? Hovering is useful, but it is not going to enable one to travel among the stars. Hovering gives us flying cars. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:50 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote: Yes,

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

, 2015 at 11:35 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Craig Haynie's message of Sun, 10 May 2015 23:19:42 -0400: Hi, I'm suggesting that in theory no energy is required as long as there is no movement. IOW he creates a force, but as long as that force doesn't act over a distance

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

of the theory paper). Whilst the EmDrive can provide lift to counter gravity, (and is therefore not losing kinetic energy), auxiliary propulsion is required to provide the kinetic energy to accelerate the vehicle. Craig On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:19 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Craig Haynie's

[Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

with the previous result. So, I don't understand how any device could hover an object with the mass of a tonne for less than a theoretical 48 kilowatts. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated. Craig Haynie ( Manchester, NH)

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >