On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 27, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 24, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The process you have described
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 24, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The process you have described has the characteristics of
a ratchet. Curiously, Jones used the ratchet metaphor in another post where
he characterised the effect
is nothing if not
unintuitive.
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Isotope separation technology can be improved
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
sense. But that's OK - QM is
nothing if not unintuitive.
Andrew
- Original Message -
*From:* Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, May 26, 2013 11:17 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Isotope separation technology can be improved
On Sat, May 25, 2013
On May 27, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On May 24, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The process you have described has the characteristics of a
ratchet. Curiously, Jones used the ratchet
Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Mon, May 27, 2013 10:11 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Isotope separation technology can be improved
On May 27, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Edmund
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Mon, May 27, 2013 10:11 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Isotope separation technology can be improved
On May 27, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Sat, May
On May 24, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On May 22, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Ed,
I think the structure of the coulomb barrier is open to intrinsic
modification, but the variables
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 22, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Ed,
I think the structure of the coulomb barrier is open to intrinsic
modification, but the variables governing this possibility cannot be
uncovered by the tools
On May 22, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
Ed,
I think the structure of the coulomb barrier is open to intrinsic
modification, but the variables governing this possibility cannot be
uncovered by the tools and concepts of high energy physics.
I agree. In fact, the insistence that
You propose that the coulomb barrier is structured differently from how it
is normally portrayed in textbooks, and it is this difference that permits
the low temperature fusion of protons and deuterons and energy
production. Wouldn't the same difference help to explain how transmutations
can
No Harry, the Coulomb barrier is the same in Hot and Cold fusion. The
difference is that it is overcome very rapidly during hot fusion and
very slowly during cold fusion. That is the only difference between
the two methods. This difference results in a different behavior.
Yes, a theory
Ed,
I am intrigued by your idea that the lack of gammas could be explained
by fusion process which happens gradually rather than suddenly as is the
case with hot fusion.
However, on the one hand you say the fusion of protons and deuterons
supplies the energy necessary to over come coulomb
Harry, calculations are useless in this case because the mechanism is
unknown to which the calculations can be applied. We know that the
mechanism for fusion and transmutation must be the same, which means
they both must occur in the same NAE. I can describe a process that
fits this
The transfer of energy in a nuclear reaction must be sudden because of
requirements of quantum mechanics.
The first law of QM is that whenever energy is transferred, the
superposition of a QM states is resolved.
The transfer of energy is equivalent to an outside observer making a
measurement of
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Tue, 21 May 2013 20:51:20 -0600:
Hi Ed,
[snip]
You may be right. Time will tell.
Robin, you are making an assumption here. You are assuming that no
energy has been lost before the neutrino is emitted and the electron
is absorbed. Suppose, as I have
Ed,
I think the structure of the coulomb barrier is open to intrinsic
modification, but the variables governing this possibility cannot be
uncovered by the tools and concepts of high energy physics. In most
situations the coulomb barrier behaves in a textbook fashion, but when
bathed in the right
Ni 62 has zero spin but the others have a nuclear spin component. So I should
be relatively easy to come up with a way to separate them.
D2
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 16:15:20 -0400
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Isotope separation technology can be improved
I don't understand why 62Ni would make a difference in the reaction. Are
we now seriously considering that the Ni nucleus participates in the
nuclear reaction that causes the heat? Dr. Storms proposes that physical
cracks in the lattice are the NAE and the money crop of the reaction does
not
I wrote:
If he only increased the concentration of one rare isotope, without
eliminating the others, I assume that would work.
The point being that present day isotope separation techniques work by
processing the same material over and over again, gradually increasing the
concentration of
Guys,
Without getting too philosophical Cost is almost a relative thing. When
the demand is there, the cost will come down to some reasonable level. When
the politicians favor it, the cost will be even lower.
Aluminum was more expensive than gold when it was first put into production.
Good point, Bob. Simple arguments can show that the amount of energy
claimed by Rossi can not result from the Ni+p=Cu reaction regardless
of the isotope. Ironically, people will accept Rossi's claim that
transmutation is the source of energy while questioning whether he
makes any energy
]:Isotope separation technology can be improved
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:48:13 -0600
Good point, Bob. Simple arguments can show that the amount of energy claimed
by Rossi can not result from the Ni+p=Cu reaction regardless of the isotope.
Ironically, people will accept Rossi's claim
If you have studied the ash from the Ni/H reactors you must conclude that:
Any elements having an even number of nucleons with spin zero will react in
LENR.
LENR has a far greater energy density than U235 because cascades of LENR
reaction products will fission from a very high atomic weight to a
From: Bob Higgins
I don't understand why 62Ni would make a difference in the reaction. Are we
now seriously considering that the Ni nucleus participates in the nuclear
reaction that causes the heat
IMO this is a Mills type reaction (BLP), involving deep hydrogen
redundancy - and
--
CC: stor...@ix.netcom.com
From: stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Isotope separation technology can be improved
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:48:13 -0600
Good point, Bob. Simple arguments can show that the amount of energy
claimed by Rossi can
Jones, there is no ash because no one has looked for deuterium.
Everyone who might find enough deuterium to detect is focused on
transmutation. If they now find deuterium, their favorite explanation
will go up in smoke and the patents that claim to need nickel will be
useless. I'm trying
Ni + p or Ni + 2p reactions. most of
these seem endothermic to me.
I would be more inclined to think there some kind of p+p like
event. (OK Ed... p e p )
Dennis
CC: stor...@ix.netcom.com
From: stor...@ix.netcom.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Isotope separation
Nickel nano-particles are superparamagnetic. They interact with dipole
vibration. This may be the reason why nickel nanostructures are important
in the nanoplasmonic causation of LENR.
*
Magnetic relaxation of a system of superparamagnetic particles weakly
coupled by dipole-dipole interactions
If Ni62 is not consumed, the cost is somewhat academic.
From: Edmund Storms
Jones, there is no ash because no one has looked for deuterium. Everyone who
might find enough deuterium to detect is focused on transmutation. If they
now find deuterium, their favorite explanation will go up in smoke and the
patents that claim to need nickel will be
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Vortex will not accept an attachment so you will have to find the paper
elsewhere.
J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci. 11 (2013) 1-15
Research Article
Nature of Energetic Radiation Emitted from a Metal Exposed to H2
Robin, you are making an assumption here. You are assuming that no
energy has been lost before the neutrino is emitted and the electron
is absorbed. Suppose, as I have proposed, the energy is lost as a
series of photons before the electron is added so that no energy
remains to be carried
33 matches
Mail list logo
