Despite rumors and info from the Greek press.
the divorce is a definitive, and perhaps implicitly
irrreversible
Rossi dixit:
Andrea Rossi
August 12th, 2011 at 2:54
AMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=501cpage=12#comment-61201
Dear Sterling Allan:
It is totally false that EFA srl has
This is a fake message from a Swedish forum. They are laughing at you! :D
http://www.energikatalysatorn.se/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2t=217start=110
Some would like to characterize Krivit as a snake.
Rossi, particularly.
In my view Krivit is simply a cynic.
Being a cynic is neither good or bad. It's what one does with one's
innate sense of cynicism that determines whether honoring such a
perception of their surroundings serves them (and
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:12 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Being a cynic is neither good or bad. It's what one does with one's
innate sense of cynicism that determines whether honoring such a
perception of their surroundings serves them (and their
Terry sez:
The truly progressive cynic eventually forms a crusty chrysalis
from which eventually emerges a jaded dung beetle.
IMHO, a truly progressive cynic has a sense of humor. Some cynics make
marvelous comedians.
About a year ago I recall Mr. Krivit demanding that Mr. Rothwell
publicly
I sed:
I perceive Mr. Krivit as working very hard at the task of being the
best investigative journalist that he can be. I think he may still
achieve that goal.
I just realized that the way I stated the above could imply that I
don't perceive Mr. Krivit as possessing very good journalistic
I find Jones’ post on finely divided nickel exceedingly interesting,
informative, and valuable. For what it is worth, the content and logic of
this post fits in well with my thinking on the Rossi question.
To further the discussion, I believe that the nano-structures that actively
mediate the
From PESN.COM
Questions:
Did Andrea Rossi ever provide your company the industrial secret,
which would include the information about how to produce an operating
kernel or reactor core?
Can you confirm that your company has assembled, built, and tested the
kernels (even if they are the exact same
Andrea Rossi
August 12th, 2011 at 10:58 AM
TO ALL OUR READERS: TODAY HAS BEEN PUBLISHED ON THE JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR
PHYSICS THE VERY INTERESTING PAPER
COLD NUCLEAR FUSION
OF E.N. TSYGANOV, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN, TEXAS, USA.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510
Noteworthy that Krivit's 200 page report included detailed
contributions by 25 volunteer experts, who showed a broad consensus
for a skeptical assessment about excess energy...
So it's not just Krivit...
Not included --
thermal electrochemical corrosion of the electric input power heating
At 11:39 PM 8/10/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
The maximum error in the actual measurement, then, will be +/- 0.1
degree, plus a little, so that it *might* be off by another digit
under some circumstances. I.e, suppose the
This seems to me, an unqualified, careful scientific layman, to be
reasonable, simple theory, citing recent experiments:
Recent experiments on fusion of elements on accelerators
For atom-atom collisions the expression of the probability of
penetration through a Coulomb barrier for bare nuclei
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Good point. On a meter with a fixed display, you cannot calibrate any
finer than the last digit displayed, minus a tad. McKubre can
calibrate RTDs (I think they are) to a fraction of a degree because
he is looking at a computer screen with as many digits as you
Terry Blanton wrote:
After AR said he did not give them the sauce, it looks like:
1) DGT has no working Hyperions.
2) DGT has working Hyperions and stole the sauce.
3) DGT has their own receipe.
You are saying these are the only three likely scenarios, right? They seem
to cover all
Abstract of Tsyganov paper.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510
Recent accelerator experiments on fusion of various elements have clearly
demonstrated that the effective cross-sections of these reactions depend on
what material the target particle is placed in. In these experiments,
From: Axil Axil
* There have been reports that Rossi uses big micro grain sized
particles as a lattice support structure to buttress small nano-dimensioned
tubule structures of nickel. This more complex topology would cut down some
on the maximum surface area that would be provided by a
At 10:46 PM 8/10/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
No, they wouldn't. You can use the resolution to make temperature
comparisons. Jed, maybe I misread the specifications. I did not,
however, make this up. And I do know for a
At 06:30 AM 8/11/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Therefore if someone knows some high impact factor journals that has
published recent could fusion findings, I would appreciate to have
some examples.
See http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cold_fusion/Recent_sources
This is a list of journal and
Even if DGT can build a Rossi knockoff, their own testing has shown the
knockoff to be potentially dangerous and hard to control.
If such a product was sold to the public in general, DGT would be legally
exposed if the knockoff cause harm to life or property.
It is in the business interest of
Axil Axil wrote:
Even if DGT can build a Rossi knockoff, their own testing has shown
the knockoff to be potentially dangerous and hard to control.
I do not know where you got that information. The Defkalion reactors
appear to be better controlled and safer than Rossi's own prototypes.
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 3:12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How to present arguments against cold fusion critics
At 06:30 AM 8/11/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Therefore if someone knows some high impact
Abd wrote:
But pressure is also important, because, of course, boiling point depends on
pressure. I see no
sign that the actual pressure inside the E-cat was measured directly.
I just read a quote yesterday from Galantini, not sure where, but I think is
may have been on
Passerini's site,
Thanks great many Abd ul-Rahman and also Jed. I presented devastating
counter-argument to Finnish pseudoskeptics. That Naturwissenschaften
article:
Status of Cold-Fusion (Storms 2010)
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf
was something that might be worthy of reading while I find
Some personal speculations of my own:
FWIW, the one little itch that I can't ignore is why does DGT continue
to behave in what strikes me as being distinctly conciliatory in their
characterization of Rossi's recent actions. DGT claims they have
developed more control and a greater safety margin
Cold Nuclear Fusion, recent experiments and theory re electron
shielding in metals: EN Tsyganov, (UA9 collaboration) University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Texas: Rich Murray
2011.08.12
[Vo]:JNP Cold Nuclear Fusion paper
fromAlan J Fletcher a...@well.com
reply-to
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, the one little itch that I can't ignore is why does DGT continue to
behave in what strikes me as being distinctly conciliatory in
their characterization of Rossi's recent actions. DGT claims they
have developed more control
Controversy is bad for both sides, right? This might disturb any other
partner that Rossi is or might contract. I just hope this whole affair ends
with Rossi just retreating from any business for a long time. In any case, I
would be happy if Defkalion just kicked the bucket and went ahead with
On August 8th, 2011 at 1:38 PM Rossi said in part on his blog as follows: “
“I have already perfectly in schedule my 1 MW plant, while the production in
big series of the E-Cats was not my duty ( by the way, I always said them
that this policy was completely wrong, for the first 2 years, but they
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
As a commercial reactor designer, Rossi may not be capable or willing to
handle the riggers of quality and revision control for a major product
release.
Well, there are a lot of engineers willing to help him gratis if he
At 04:40 PM 8/12/2011, Mark Iverson wrote:
Abd wrote:
But pressure is also important, because, of course, boiling point
depends on pressure. I see no
sign that the actual pressure inside the E-cat was measured directly.
I just read a quote yesterday from Galantini, not sure where, but I
30 matches
Mail list logo
