RE: [Vo]:Laissez les bon temps rouler -

To which I imagine we can add the beneficial effects of exposure to sunlight, especially with the atmosphere clearer of fine particulate matter. John Newman From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com [mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com] Sent: 28 March 2020 15:30 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo

Re: [Vo]:Physicists Have Officially Smashed The Record For High-Temperature Superconductivity

My freezer claims it can go to that... On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:35 PM Axil Axil wrote: > > https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-have-officially-smashed-the-record-for-high-temperature-superconductivity > > > Physicists Have Officially Smashed The Record For High-Temperature >

Re: [Vo]:test2

icle On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:23 PM William Beaty wrote: > > test > > -- > > ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) ) > William J. Beatyhttp://staff.washington.edu/wbeaty/ > wbeaty, uw edu Research Engineer > billb, amasci com UW

Re: [Vo]:Superconductivity at temperatures around 77 degrees Fahrenheit

Thanks God! Good job we can dispense with the experimenting and theory, we just have to ask you! On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:12 AM Brian Ahern wrote: > Room temp SC is impossible > > -- > *From:* Axil Axil > *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2019 11:25 PM > *To:*

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

d of twice the original rotation rate. I suspect that this action takes exactly the 8J that gets added to the system giving a total of 16 after this action. Moving the orbiting masses to their respective orbiting centres requires no net energy. On 5/02/2019 11:03 am, John Shop wrote: Hi Vibrat

Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity

Hi Vibrator, Since you NEED to know, I will point out where the fallacy lies. When the orbiting motors activate to stop the orbiting rotors from rotating, you have neglected the reaction torque of these motors. The reaction torque acts back on the central rotor, also stopping its rotation.

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

y the w/e i'll post it up here, though i'm setting my > expectations low, just as you are.. > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:20 AM, John Shop wrote: > >> On 5/06/2018 2:40 AM, Vibrator ! wrote: >> >> Your view of what is conserved and why is too simple, and essentially >

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

, it might be correct based on out understanding and maybe in reality too and not a glitch. I personally doubt any of these schemes is how true violations happen, they occur IMO by disturbing the fabric of space, mske interactions asymmetric. On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:04 PM, John Shop wrote

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

On 5/06/2018 1:51 PM, John Berry wrote: Actually, I have another one... Take a large loop apply a current, we see that each side of the loop experiences a pushing outwards. Now, we remove one side, from the loop and replace it with capacitor plates. No we energize a current through our broken

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

broken or incomplete, maybe the loophole would work on reality, maybe it wouldn't, but either way we can with logic find such flaws. On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:51 PM, John Berry wrote: > Actually, I have another one... > > Take a large loop apply a current, we see that each side of

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

as if you can put a current, if space can be polarized, then it can also be thrust against! On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:42 PM, John Berry wrote: > > > > > > *On 5/06/2018 12:30 AM, John Berry wrote:John, there might be the odd > exception.I can give you an example that s

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

*On 5/06/2018 12:30 AM, John Berry wrote:John, there might be the odd exception.I can give you an example that seems to break the CoM and CoE, it isn't practical. Now there might be an explanation, MAYBE it produces a photos that explains the propulsive effects... But I doubt it.Now, the easiest

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

On 5/06/2018 4:32 AM, Vibrator ! wrote: LOL have i not just clearly delineated the terms of their equivalence? Allow me to put it more tangibly: - Apply a 9.81 N force vertically between two 1 kg masses, the moment both are dropped into freefall. - We observe a kind of inverted 'slinky drop'

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

On 5/06/2018 2:40 AM, Vibrator ! wrote: Your view of what is conserved and why is too simple, and essentially incomplete. All force interactions perform work against the vacuum activity manifesting that force - the discrete, quantised energy exchanges between the respective force carriers in

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

On 5/06/2018 12:30 AM, John Berry wrote: John, there might be the odd exception. I can give you an example that seems to break the CoM and CoE, it isn't practical. Now there might be an explanation, MAYBE it produces a photos that explains the propulsive effects... But I doubt it. Now

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

On 5/06/2018 12:37 AM, Vibrator ! wrote: Consider a 1 kg weight, connected by a pulley cord to another mass that slides horizontally without friction. You may verify that the rate of change of net system momentum is a constant, invariant of the ratio of gravitating to non-gravitating mass -

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

John, there might be the odd exception. I can give you an example that seems to break the CoM and CoE, it isn't practical. Now there might be an explanation, MAYBE it produces a photos that explains the propulsive effects... But I doubt it. Now, the easiest way to explain (though

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

On 4/06/2018 11:19 PM, Vibrator ! wrote: . . . The only precondition there is that we can apply a force between two inertias, which nonetheless only accelerates one of them. This I suggest is your problem. If you apply a force between two masses or inertias, then one must accelerate in the

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

On 1/06/2018 5:35 AM, Vibrator ! wrote: . . . The thing is, a real model is inherently suspect - defeating its ostensible purpose. Batteries and motors can be hidden, etc. If you make it out of clear perspex with the minimum steel parts like bearings, springs, etc then there is nowhere to

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

Vibrator, there are a number of claims involving violation of CoM and CoE, and it involves an asymmetry in the rate a acceleration/deceleration. I wonder if that fits your description. Also sometimes this seems to include a influence or energy field exiting the mass. Is this maybe the case? On

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

cradle' kind of way.. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:17 AM, Axil Axil wrote: > >> The common thinking about successful over unity is to produce a COP of 6 >> or over. The one application that you might try is a toy. If your invention >> can operate without any inputs, this typ

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

your idea out there as anyone with a suitable 3D printer can just press print and see if it works! I have tried to convey a very very simple proof for breaking the conservation of momentum and it seems to go over peoples heads, I honestly don't know why. John On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:59 PM

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

Yes, but that is hard to do. And scammers have sold stuff in the past... On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > The best way to sell an idea is to produce a product based on the idea > that can make money and lots of it. > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 8:15 PM, John

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

correction: Ideally film the construction On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:13 PM, John Berry wrote: > Hi vibrator. The "right" people are hard to fine. > > Very few people will consider that the CoM or the CoE could possibly be > violated and won't even humor you. > &g

Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU

will lead to the inventions suppression and maybe your death. John On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Vibrator ! wrote: > I've found Bessler's gain principle. The energy density's obviously > 'infinite', and power density's limited only by material constraints. > > A propulsion appli

Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons

e has always been a combination of inspiration and perspiration > though it is in the sweating in the performance that the donnas are > separated from the primadonnas. > > > > Watch and wait or join me and make a difference. > > > > The greatest threat to the world is wa

Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons

ntentionally produced and reduced with prescribed changes in the > experiment. So far so good. Of course this must be repeated with ever more > precision and care, an effort in process at this moment. > > > > *From:* John Berry <aethe...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2018

Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons

Is there any difference when the tube, shielding and Geiger counter are vertically disposed as in the image, or horizontally? How can you be sure it isn't some capacitive coupling effect? Could you ground the shields? Could you apply voltage spikes to the plates without them being exposed to the

Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

>From the patent... "a free electron has inertial mass but not gravitational mass." and "Thus, a free electron is not gravitationally attracted to ordinary matter. " Really? Can that really add up? Pretty sure this is not very much in agreement with conventional theor

Re: [Vo]:Fission may be the best fit for future LENR

As the smoke cleared Brian Ahern mounted the barricade and roared out: I use outlook for e-mails.How do you block certain senders? From: Che . . . Best to filter all vortex mail to its own folder

Re: [Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish

est scientific breakthrough is sitting here waiting or me to build a competent and proper scale device with real energy input, or waiting for me to discover how to "Macgyver" it with a paperclip, a 9v battery and a magnet. John Berry On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:26 AM, David Roberson &

Re: [Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish

? There is a lot of evidence that circular things and circular arrays of things can do things that are extraordinary and unexpected by a single element. This is not out of reach, it can be explained. John Berry On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 1:10 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: >

[Vo]:Cap Warp - McCandlish

this group isn't interested? John Berry

Re: [Vo]:CERN Declares War On The Standard Model

and the most interesting thing that billions of dollars can do is find bulls#!+ like that! The huge gaps in understanding are ignored, but I'm glad they are tracking down tiny details. They are blind to so much! The standard model can eat our dust! John Berry On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Kevin

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

for collecting data of failures to be a success :) John Berry On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> It might have limited application, but mostly, I don't see it, too often >> su

Re: [Vo]:Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures

So if that was done with cold fusion... IMO failures in experimental sciences are too specific for it to be meaningful. It might have limited application, but mostly, I don't see it, too often success and failure is just an inch apart. John Berry On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Nigel Dyer &l

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

On 18/03/2017 2:23 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: The fact is that almost every educated and intelligent person would regard telepathy as supernatural . . . First, I regard it as mythical, not supernatural. There is no solid evidence for it. Second, I am sure that if does exist, it is natural,

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

On 17/03/2017 10:04 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > wrote: I don't think machines will be able to duplicate what a bird brain can do, any time, ever. Machines which we can invent are things that we can understand almost completely. I do not think

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

On 17/03/2017 9:43 PM, bobcook39...@gmail.com wrote: >> "consciousness, . . . is a supernatural phenomenon." > RIGHT-ON. Like virtual quarks and spooky action at a distance, and > other real phenomena. I am surprised that you agreed so readily that telepathy between consciousnesses is a real

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

On 17/03/2017 2:08 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: . . . I see no reason why this will not happen sooner or later. Machines are far from being able to do this now, because they have brains roughly the size of a bird's brain. Birds do not understand human language. . . . So I believed until quite

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

On 17/03/2017 2:08 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: . . . I see no reason why this will not happen sooner or later. Machines are far from being able to do this now, because they have brains roughly the size of a bird's brain. Birds do not understand human language. . . . So I believed until quite

Re: [Vo]:N.Y. Times report on corruption in academic science

Cancer is IMO easily treated. But the treatments don't lead to patented medicine or expensive treatments. I have zero fear of cancer. John On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com>

Re: [Vo]:N.Y. Times report on corruption in academic science

http://www.australiannationalreview.com/cancer-research-fraud-claims-nobel-prize-winner/ On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > I believe there is a great deal of corruption in academic science. Several > cold fusion researchers, biologists and others have

Re: [Vo]:Li batteries

The Samsung Galaxy has a serious battery fire issue. I don't think it is that size has a huge impact on the probability other than maybe scaling linearly obviously, but that it has a huge impact on the seriousness of a problem. John On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Jones Beene <j

Re: [Vo]:Unsubscribe me, please

"Bi Vort"., quite appropriate. On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Lawrence de Bivort > wrote: > >> Thanks. >> >> Lawrence de Bivort >> > > You have to do it yourself. > > To unsubscribe, send a

Re: [Vo]:Article: Researchers accidentally turn carbon dioxide into ethanol

But Jones, then you burn the Ethanol putting the CO2 back into the air! But if the Ethanol is used to make plastic, or something solid... On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > Rant of the day: > > Oak Ridge needs ever increasing levels of public funding,

Re: [Vo]:Article: Electrons with no mass acquire a mass in the presence of a high magnetic field

"zirconium pentatelluride,ZrTe5, that provides strong evidence for the chiral magnetic effect:. My research is all based on chirality of coils that produce fundamentally different "currents". This is no doubt closely related to my work! On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 1:23 PM, John B

Re: [Vo]:Article: Electrons with no mass acquire a mass in the presence of a high magnetic field

ide of any possible conventional explanation like the Placebo effect. But there is another current in the reverse direction that is denser and appears to be more like a proton. John On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Electrons with no

Re: [Vo]:Gain from wires and magnets?

of people on this list have felt an energy from images I have made, you I have found light can effect the underlying aether, suitable enough for the majority of random people to feel something. Including in situations where zero possibility of the placebo effect exist. John On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

not sure I was being serious, but then again I'm not certain that I'm not being either. On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *From:* John Berry > > Well, particles (electrons, protons, atoms, bucky balls, ignored cats) > fired at a sc

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

Well, particles (electrons, protons, atoms, bucky balls, ignored cats) fired at a screen still produce an interference... So maybe protons could tunnel through a barrier if there is a wave from another proton that interferes? Could this be how tunneling works? On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 2:01 AM,

Re: [Vo]:EM Drive powered by entangled photons

allows an object to become invisible? And is light ever absorbed anyway? Or does it just result in an opposite photon that reduces the energy to zero, both moving on forever in utter undetectable insignificance? John On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:11 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

I should have said: And that only as a group and or over time or at a distance does the fields become a smooth inverse square with no irregularities, perturbations or features. On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:56 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe I'm missing somet

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

e overcome. Not another force, just discontinuities in the electric field. Otherwise doesn't Ken Shoulders work point to a 6th force? John On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Russ, a great find. > > A new boson must carry a new force since

Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facility without industrial ventilation would be fatal

On 21/05/2016 11:13 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Once again people have claimed you can release 1 MW with no ill effects in a small facility, without industrial scale ventilation. People should apply some common sense metrics! Rossi says the facility is 6,500 sq. feet. Conventional heating calls

Re: [Vo]:Re: Anyone can "steal" IP from a patent

. John On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > It would seem the only PHOSITA that was required by the agreement was for >> the low temperature E-Cat. Rossi has indicated he taug

Re: [Vo]:Re: Declaration from Eindhoven University of Technology related to M. Yildiz magnet motor

wrote: > In reply to John Berry's message of Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:28:55 +1300: > Hi, > [snip] > >Maybe energy can be created or destroyed in a net manner by some > alteration of the vacuum? > > All energy comprises vacuum in motion. In order to destroy it, you have to

Re: [Vo]:Re: Declaration from Eindhoven University of Technology related to M. Yildiz magnet motor

That gives his claim far more credit in my eyes. Gravitational anomalies (and others) occurring with free energy is common enough. And indicates there is something real behind it. John On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:41 AM, H Ucar <jjam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Robin, > > &qu

Re: [Vo]:Re: Declaration from Eindhoven University of Technology related to M. Yildiz magnet motor

be a calculator for establishing the energy in a magnetic field floating around the internet somewhere. John On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:15 AM, H Ucar <jjam...@gmail.com> wrote: > a.ashfield wrote: > > "With known science the only way it could work is by using up th

Re: [Vo]:Re: Declaration from Eindhoven University of Technology related to M. Yildiz magnet motor

that which is outside our knowledge. Some things are logically impossible (continual compression beyond random data), but creation/destruction of energy is not one of them. John On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to H Ucar's message of Mon, 14 Mar 2016 1

Re: [Vo]:Bacteria able to eat plastic bottles discovered by scientists

I think the word "Trumps" is one that people might find a bit disconcerting at this juncture. Unless by "trumping" you mean to attract racists and incite violence. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Russ George wrote: > Far better to just start replacing all of the

Re: [Vo]:Is Rossi sick?

il <janap...@gmail.com>: >> >> Rossi is complaining about a 'failure to thrive' condition such as losing >> weight without reason. We might consider that a primary symptom of chronic >> radiation exposure is unexplained weight loss. >> >> Andrea Rossi >&g

Re: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

I do accept improvements have been made. Still, plenty of extremely dangerous jobs exist for men, I live in a logging town. Now that is up there with atlantic fishing in a small boat danger wise. John On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > That

Re: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

e found UK numbers that were similar. I don't deny that this is surprising, hard to believe and difficult to take seriously. But sometimes we only get half the story. Society only hears what it has an appetite to listen to. The best kept secrets are the ones that keep themselves. John On Tue, Fe

Re: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

. And inequality is inequality no matter which way it is pointed. John On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think if as many women were killed at jobs, especially if it was the >> same bu

Re: [Vo]:Intelligent robots threaten millions of jobs

I think if as many women were killed at jobs, especially if it was the same but reverse of the actual m/f ratio, there would have long ago been a massive push to make these jobs safer. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:23

Re: [Vo]:Article: Chiral magnetic effect generates quantum current

. And then it goes on to talk about massless particles that are like electrons! This just sounds like an echo chamber of my own work. John (call me paranoid, but article below in case it disappears or gets modified) Scientists at the U.S Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory

Re: [Vo]:Orbo- Battery _Steorn and Lockheed- Bushman Battery Patent

Here is a good video that shows he slot antenna effect and how some cheap aluminum tape can fix it up for a massive improvement in shielding. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3S2KDuVxaU On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: > It only has a 1 year

Re: [Vo]:North Korea... and the UDD "candle"?

that is scary! John On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > You still are not on the right page, John. > > I think this is because you are unaware of Leif Holmlid’s work, and how > that work fits into the big picture of World politics. Holmlid is

Re: [Vo]:North Korea... and the UDD "candle"?

Given the features of UDD, assuming Holmlid is correct, then > there are options which could include Cohen’s claim of a ballotechnic > driven fusion device (no fission trigger) which was largely debunked > > > > *From:* John Berry > > > > Not sure what you mean by 'boost

Re: [Vo]:North Korea... and the UDD "candle"?

Not sure what you mean by 'boosted fission' but my understanding is that ALL Fusion bombs are either Fission-Fusion or Fission-Fusion-Fission. We don't publically have the technical ability to create mass fusion without fission first, if we did hot fusion power would be a reality. John On Fri

Re: [Vo]:new images RAR Energia gravity motor

you mess with matter's coupling to the aether, how you stop the mathematical predicted results that conserve energy and momentum. John On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 5:01 AM, MJ <feli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Last year RAR stated they have a working small model before designing &g

Re: [Vo]:new images RAR Energia gravity motor

to lose a decade trying to get it to all work together smoothly, with low enough friction etc... And it is hard to believe in an impossible sounding, unclear complex design... John On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:21 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > RAR Energia have publi

Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field

hmmm I wonder... If spin is a spin of the electrons field, then maybe electrons are like earth moon, and for each revolution around the center, they revolve once so as to always show the same side to the nucleus. This way each orbit would produce one revolution. And it would mean spin only

[Vo]:Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field

I tend not to agree with the belief of the author, but he has some good points http://educate-yourself.org/cn/ElectronBeamMagneticField.pdf Currently there are two explanations. One surely must be wrong.

Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field

Robin, for what its worth I think you are probably right. A free electron having a magnetic moment makes no sense to me. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > > > Where does the photon get its angular momentum, when it and its twin > appear from

Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field

Robin, the question and perhaps some of the following comments made here lend evidence to you being correct. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:34 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Robin, for what its worth I think you are probably right. > > A free electron having a magnet

Re: [Vo]:Re: Magnetic moment .vs motion as source of magnetic field

Strange, I pasted the link, but then the email accidentally sent prematurely without the link: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/126986/where-does-the-electron-get-its-high-magnetic-moment-from On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:38 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: &

Re: [Vo]:N. Y. Times article comment

concerned about global warming are wrong, what's the cost? Wouldn't being greener bring other benefits anyway? John On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote: > For fear of being branded a card carrying republican, I hate to comment on > such topics

Re: [Vo]:N. Y. Times article comment

internally believe (and did early on), the insurance industry, the military believes it is real. At least the last 2 are taking actions on the presumption rising seas. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:51 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bob, you seem to agree there is warm

Re: [Vo]:Electric Rocket-like Propulsion Patent Application by Banduric

Very similar to my ideas. This is the same line of thinking that can produce a conclusion of negative impedance in a non-inductive coil with a high negative charge. I had never studied the idea for propulsive forces. On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:05 AM, H Ucar wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:Electric Rocket-like Propulsion Patent Application by Banduric

, and a quick trip to Mars. John On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:20 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Very similar to my ideas. > > This is the same line of thinking that can produce a conclusion of > negative impedance in a non-inductive coil with a high negative charge. >

Re: [Vo]:Electric Rocket-like Propulsion Patent Application by Banduric

, now it seems clear this is not the case. Interestingly the fluxliner might be explainable by this mechanism if the central coil produces a drag (electromagnetic frame dragging) selectively in the capacitor plates. Still overall that seems unlikely to be the explanation for that effect. John

[Vo]:Antigravity started at Vortex - Fluxliner

g circular and perhaps segmented. John

Re: [Vo]:The vacuum is the glue that keeps the universe together.

So then, are the radius that electrons orbit at, points where the 'uncertainty' of their position becomes evenly distributed around the atom, such that they exist in all those positions simultaneously? Essentially a maximization and perfection of their uncertainty. Also, if this is so, would it

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

It still seems to happen, but yeah you're right, way less energetic. But still an explosion: https://youtu.be/vRKK6pliejs?t=43 On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:35 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com>

Re: [Vo]:Re: Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

Good question. A cellphone app maybe? On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:40 PM, jjam...@gmail.com wrote: > > Even there would be a conventional way to explain the explosion, it may be > worth to check the presence of ionizing particles at this short moment. > Could be an affordable

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

(beta, or otherwise?). Hmmm, if Beta decay, can't beta radiation be converted directly into electrical current in a current carrying wire? John

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

And then try: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDlyg_9m7tk On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:24 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps because of this breakthrough? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmlAYnFF_s8 > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:08 AM, jjam...@gmail.c

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

Perhaps because of this breakthrough? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmlAYnFF_s8 On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:08 AM, jjam...@gmail.com wrote: > I exploded two button batteries by heating through soldering iron. > Explosion is spectacular, maybe comparable to amno. When

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

, it is likely the anomalously energetic explosions are a result of melting electrodes. John On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:24 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Perhaps because of this brea

Re: [Vo]:Old disposible button lithium batteries spectacularly explodes

by a long way, then smashing this on the face of a strong magnet should create a powerful magnetic pulse. Very tempted to try that. John On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.

Re: [Vo]:Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through

low energy (slow neutron radiation), could the hazards of radioactive isotopes and neutron radiation be mitigated? Of course if they are ejected with very low energy, I'm not sure how that helps excess energy show up. John On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:33 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.

Re: [Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

If Protons are are made of Muons, then could Muons or anti-Muons fired at a Proton/atom not cause Proton Decay and atomic Transmutation/Fission? Particle physics isn't my bag, anyone know what results? On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5,

Re: [Vo]:A model of the proton to describe Holmlid's results

If Protons were composed of Muons and Anti-Muons, both short lived and annihilate with each other, how could there be no evidence of Proton Decay? I didn't even finish reading, so maybe this was explained later, but that's all I had the time or head space to observe. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:43

[Vo]:Why apathy and denial rules on threats of extinction!

going on below my signature. John I have an extraordinary claim to make, and the reaction I have had from readers backs up my claim, that I have found the cause behind Humanity's evident inability to avoid destruction of the natural world and with it our own demise, AND I have found a solution

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

orbit. John On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 4:10 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: I suspect that a force of this nature will balance out in the long run due to the rotation of the Earth. Dave -Original Message- From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

? Years? Decades? Centuries? Millenna? At any rate it would eventually disturb the earth's current orbit dramatically. Something to be cautious of. John On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote: Axil, one more jump and you will be out on the limb

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

Here is an interesting thought, if this did work to produce thrust that did not act against the earth, then the earth would be moved in the direction of the device due to attraction to the device (flying car) equal to the weight of the object (it is attracted to the whole mass of the earth, and

Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit

, but it is not going to enable one to travel among the stars. Hovering gives us flying cars. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:50 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, the reaction mass is the earth. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >