unsubscribe
*De-lurks*
Ridiculous to assert that IH have not acting in good faith - if the demo
worked they would be the happiest people in the world and would be on track
to make vast amounts of money even if they had to hand over 90million they
would be doing so with a big smile on their face. The very
I skimmed through it, one thing that struck me was that they hit 1372°C for
10 minutes. I have serious doubts that their stainless steel vessel could
have survived such a temperature (barely bellow melting) - which makes me
suspicious of an error somewhere, this is above where k-type
*delurks*
Frustrating that with COP's 2 and output powers of 100's to 1000's of
watts that simple calorimetry cannot be used to remove doubt, instead we
have 5-10 equivocal demonstrations from Rossi over last 4 years,
(supposedly a genius, yet not competent or willing to do this relatively
minor
There are at least 5-10 different kinds of old and new stirling engines
available with 30-40% efficiency using 7-800°C input temperatures. They
range from 100W-30kW in capacity. So no problem doing a self-driven system
with LENR COP of 3.2
Qenergy probably easiest to get a hold of (around 33%,
, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
There are at least 5-10 different kinds of old and new stirling engines
available with 30-40% efficiency using 7-800°C input temperatures. They
range from 100W-30kW in capacity. So no problem doing a self-driven system
with LENR COP of 3.2
be extremely difficult to understand why the measured
behavior tends to follow what my simulation predicts.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Oct 15, 2014 11:53 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:temperature
heat.
Harry
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Not if it is touching the walls of inner or outer alumina tube in places,
intermittent contact due to vagaries of original wire winding around inner
tube and subsequent large differential
If the LENR reaction suffers from thermal runaway then the best means for
cooling is a coolant fluid slightly below the target temperature. Eg
1180°C coolant and 1200°C running temp so raising temp to 1240°C would then
triple cooling rate, so 'clamping' the temperature. A lithium heat pipe
would
it is late here.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 16, 2014 2:20 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:temperature of the resistor wire.
(Dave, my granddad is Bob, I'm Robert :) ), I would be over the moon if
we
how do you know this? How do you know the the wire is not the brightest
area?
On 15 October 2014 15:06, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Some people suspect that the resistor wire can't be Inconel because they
are predicted to melt at the reactor's operating temperature. However,
since
Highly doubtful. Above curie temperture of Nickel so no ferromagnetism,
and powder too microscopic hot resistivity too high, and AC frequency,
current and number of windings too low for strong magnetic fields or
significant eddy currents to form and give push via lenzs law.
On 15 October 2014
can see the the
dark lines are of uniform width, continuity and shade. I am 95% confident
that is the shadow of the coil. The light areas change in brightness,
width, etc.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
how do you know this? How do you
to. I think that is pretty strong indication that it is the wires
that are the bright areas.
On 15 October 2014 20:14, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am looking at high zoom at the same photos and finding it easy to draw
the opposite conclusion. Confirmation bias on both our
Not lying, but perhaps again confirmation bias, based on wrong assumptions.
How can the inconel wire in Fig 12b be hotter/brighter in the cooler
external environment outside the end of the reactor than it is in the
hotter internal environment inside the reactor?
On 15 October 2014 21:12, Blaze
transfer physics
at play make it a strong possibility that there was no gain.
On 15 October 2014 21:40, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Robert Lynn
How can the Inconel wire in Fig 12b be hotter/brighter in the cooler
external environment outside the end of the reactor than
the resistor wire expands with respect to the alumina as it heats up,
breaking any bonding contact, or lifting the wire of the inner alumina tube
in more and more places and leading to less and less conductive contact -
prompting the wire to heat up as more as more of the energy it transmits to
suggest you think a bit longer about it.
On 16 October 2014 08:33, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Since they are measuring the input energy to the wire that makes no sense
On Wednesday, October 15, 2014, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
the resistor wire expands
such units are not made as 3 phase helically wound assemblies, MoSi2 is
non-ductile/brittle and very difficult to make and even worse to bond to,
and there is still the unanswered problem of how do you bond inconel wire
that can survive only to 1350°C to an insulated heating element that is
to confirm or disprove your theory, and numbers
would at least give foundation to your hope.
On 16 October 2014 09:25, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this not indicate that the wire must be producing inductive heating
in the powder?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Robert Lynn
...@gmail.com wrote:
If the wire inside the reactor was hot enough to glow it should produce a
more uniform spiral glow along the entire length of the tube.
Harry
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Additionally, look at the darkened photo
Nullis in verba. :) I believe my eyes more than others words. In finding
so many potential faults with so little published information (they had a
month to investigate!!) I can only say that I am unimpressed by the
critical observational skills of the testers. If they had approached this
demo
Nullis in verba. :) I believe my eyes more than others words. In finding
so many potential faults with so little published information (they had a
month to investigate!!) I can only say that I am unimpressed by the
critical observational skills or reporting of the testers. If they had
*Gesendet:* Montag, 13. Oktober 2014 um 07:11 Uhr
*Von:* Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
*An:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Betreff:* [Vo]:E-cat Lugano demo probably had no output.
Appears that there was an inner reactor vessel wrapped with helical
resistance wires (hence shadows) from
I've just realised that if my no-LENR output power conclusion is sound,
then Rossi is in serious trouble trying to explain the Ni62 ash. Could be
the end of him.
On 13 October 2014 20:11, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
done, not much point in doing more exhaustive
The system is way too complex for thermography to be able to deal with. I
note that most black-body radiation for 1400°C:
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131016/ncomms3630/images_article/ncomms3630-f4.jpg
has majority of emission at 4um where the alumina transmittance appears
relatively high in
It seems clear that the thermography is way off - because the built in
inconel heater wires would fail at 1350°C. (The peak temp from
thermography is 1412°C). And the wires would necessarily be much hotter
than the external surface of the reactor - if they are wound tightly around
an inner core
-Max average Ecat temp recorded in test 1412°C, 2.8kW heat output.
- 20mm diameter, 200mm long, thermal conductivity of alumina 6W/m/K at
1400°C means for 1mm wall thickness would have 40°C through-wall temp
differential, for 2mm would be 80°C.
-So assuming 1mm wall thickness (probably
and temperature differences created by
natural convection could be modelled with CFD and would be a way to
validate the power output via radiation.
Still wishing they had done some simple air-flow calorimetry with a hood
and chimney instead.
On 12 October 2014 17:39, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l
Fig 12b. page 26. Only just notice that they say they are inconel
resistance wires. But how can the resistor wire, external to the reactor,
glow more brightly than the reactor itself (implying it is hotter)? Also
if the reactor external surface is at 1250-1410°C, then on top of the
30-50°C
that it is an inductive heater this means that
the wires
get a bit cooler then the heated core.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Fig 12b. page 26. Only just notice that they say they are inconel
resistance wires. But how can the resistor wire, external
weighing under Fig1 452g with
resistance wire inside is a strong indication of no such additional
components being inside.
On 13 October 2014 00:36, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
This reactor
produce a fast response to the actual cylinder
which controls the heat radiative environment in there.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
inductive heating only works on conductive materials with sufficient
thickness/area through which
of the reactor in operation. I like the
inductive heating idea.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The tubercles on the nickel powder function to ionize the hydrogen using
dipole motion induced by heat.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l
against inductive heating, and
this might leave us with resistive heating and a good evidence that the
core is hot due to the reaction and not because of resistive heating.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
far above curie limit for Ni, magnetic
I would concur regarding the colour being too cold, but I have seen
previous pictures where digital cameras also do not show just how bright
something is glowing (from work in engine testing with exhausts at a
precisely measured 900°C) so would not be too critical on that alone. The
visible
no small rankine turbines or steam engines are that efficient. Best bet
would be a stirling engine from qnergy http://www.qnergy.com/. About 3kW
output and 30-35% efficient and designed to feed into the grid. If run in
some un-prepared location like a lecture hall or foyer that would make a
-Original Message-
From: Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Oct 12, 2014 1:35 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Engineering and materials issues with high temperature
hot-cat Lugano demo
if there was an inner metal cylinder to contain reactants
a tall well insulated chimney would sort that out, and flow velocity (and
hence mass flow) in chimney can be accurately inferred from temperature
given column pressure differential caused by air density difference.
Calorimetry with just two thermocouples to measure inlet and outlet air
temps!
On
like the reddish glow discharge from a lithium plasma in an alumina vessel
that is partially transparent to IR?
On 13 October 2014 11:43, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I refer to the opposite effect in this case Harry. In other words, can
the color appear to be too dark in the
Appears that there was an inner reactor vessel wrapped with helical
resistance wires (hence shadows) from size of wires and necessary wall
thicknesses this vessel is likely around 12mm diameter.
Inner wall area of outer finned tube about Ø18mm, 0.2m long .0113m²
Inconel metal resistance wires
Excellent point. Would be easy enough to do a second control run even now
to add some confidence to the calorimetry. The alumina + wire will be
off-the-shelf all someone need do is ask Rossi for specs of tube and wire -
he should be happy to provide them in the interests of clarity.
On 10
De-cloaking long term lurker.
Latest test result issues that raise my suspicions:
- The uniformity of the Ni ash concerns me, the burn mechanism somehow
converts all natural Ni isotopes (smaller and larger!! so fusion and
fission in evidence) to Ni62, but with miraculously no radioactive
. Besides the analyzed elements it has been found that the fuel
also contains rather high concentrations of C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn and these
are not found in the ash.
This means that C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn were consumed in the LENR reaction.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Robert Lynn
P29:
By the researchers calculations there are 3MWh released from transmutation
of Li7, and Ni isotopes, and supposedly all of the other initial chemicals
transmuted into Ni too as not present in Ash (which would release huge,
though unquantified amounts of binding energy), yet only 1.5MWh output
Not due to environment, all kinematic (=Siemens style 4 cylinder alpha
arrangement) are fundamentally flawed due to highly stressed non-lubricated
piston rod seals that only last a few months in continuous use.
Alternative free-piston engines (eg infinia) are screwed due to very high
tolerances
of
this conductivity structure?
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be a very simple means of providing excellent high temperature
control.
A coil of tube inside the reactor containing water with a pressurised
cold reservoir attached to one end
** **
*From:* Robert Lynn [mailto:robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, May 31, 2013 1:26 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:On deception. 3rd EE
** **
Another EE here (plus mechanical undergrad). On balance I think Rossi has
something, but I have been disappointed by too
Kevin, that doesn't look like sneering to me, more like simply Joshua's
assessment of the motivations for positions that others are taking, without
invective or nastiness that I can see.
I am generally saddened to see the recent witch-hunt/culling of
dissent/heresy in the Vort. The 'sneering'
Another EE here (plus mechanical undergrad). On balance I think Rossi has
something, but I have been disappointed by too many of his slap-dash demos
over the last two years to put my reputation on the line in backing him.
And there are some potentially big holes in the electrical power delivery
Wasn't there a similar AC power measurement cock-up on a previous 2011 or
2012 Rossi test?
On 28 May 2013 14:56, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
**
I said
*The measurement task has been made unnecessarily difficult by
specifying 3-phase input to
Totally agree Andrew. Rossi is possibly snatching defeat from the jaws of
victory by not allowing sufficiently clear measurement.
I find myself in a similar situation to 2011, tests that looked initially
compelling, appear with greater thought to have potentially significant
flaws. There is no
On 25 May 2013 21:35, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew andrew...@att.net wrote:
That is precisely why I (and Duncan Cumming) are calling for a test
whereby there is no power input for a decent amount of time.
My understanding is that the Hot Cat will blow up if you do
Strange, in my observation 3 things define the best engineers I know (of
few hundred I have met):
1 Excellent/encyclopedic memory - at least for engineering stuff, may not
be able to remember their friends names or where they put their keys.
2 Good at mental calculation (assess what-ifs quickly).
This has only just occurred to me, but in my mind is a bit of a red flag:
The reactor vessel is a sealed metal container, no electrical or magnetic
signal of any frequency will penetrate it (It is a faraday cage). And all
of the resistive heating elements are positioned around it, so they do
** **
** **
*From:* Jones Beene
** **
Robert Lynn wrote:
And all of the resistive heating elements are positioned around it, so
they do nothing but deliver heat to the reactor contents - no special
magnetic or electrical excitation can pass through the reactor
well
feel this PWM-modulated field.
** **
-Mark Iverson
** **
*From:* Robert Lynn [mailto:robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, May 24, 2013 10:57 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Why did Rossi prevent detailed measurement of the
power input
And what of the reagents within the reactor? the hydride or other hydrogen
supplying material. These are very combustible/oxidisable in air at high
temp, quite likely to the point of melting stainless.
On 24 May 2013 22:30, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
David, have you ever
Have a bit more of a think about it Jed, IR laser beams wouldn't need to be
any more intense than the heat being radiated by the E-cat. In fact by
shining in from multiple directions they could be less intense than the
emitted heat from the E-cat (like concentrating relatively diffuse sunlight
to
Gary Wright, Rossi's Florida factory claim nemesis
On 23 May 2013 18:56, Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Someone actually paid for the url shutdownrossi.com ? Altruistic rarely
extends to paid attacks... I would ignore any information on a site with
this sort of url.
Fran
An IR laser wouldn't need to be intense, it/they could be spread out over a
wide beam/spot, not eye dangerous, and not particularly noticeable if you
weren't looking at it and you were in close proximity to the hot e-cat
(could even be optically triggered to turn off off if someone moved in
Haven't commented here in a while, pretty excited that after a couple of
years of Rossi's shenanigans it's all perhaps about to happen. But I come
from a hard test and measurement background (mechanical and electrical
engineer, specialising in thermodynamics) and am by nature quite skeptical,
so
Jed the issue is not the warming, it is the attribution.
As all scientists know correlation does not equal causation. - particularly
true when we are only looking at a couple of decades out of a series that
is literally billions of years long. There are demonstrably (historically
any time before
Jed, the argument from authority approach with regard to climate change
doesn't work because there are so many highly educated dissenting voices,
so many examples of deficient analysis work in Climatology (check out
Climate Audit), and yet seemingly so little interest in improving woefully
bad
On 28 November 2012 16:29, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
The take-home, though, is that NIF is far, far from practical power
generation. Cold fusion long ago reached this relaxed definition of
ignition. I'll venture a prediction, based on what I've been seeing, that
we'll
Another hyperbolic Climate Change scare story.
Arabica is grown between 600 and 2000m altitude. At typical 0.65°C per
100m lapse rate in tropics that is a about an 8°C temperature range. The
world warmed by 0.7°C last century, (though no rise in last 15 years) so
that the same temperature
People who get rich off of climate change research (academics and green
fund-raisers/politicians) like to claim that climate change leads to more
'extreme weather' like hurricanes, droughts etc, but they only get away
with it because of short human memories. Actual data shows that there is
no
Reactor has a 1m long 0.2mm isotan44 wire (Cu37 Ni62 Mn1 alloy) weighing
about 0.3grams, and puts out about 10-20W excess heat with 3-8 bar of H2.
Ie 50kW/kg of metal, reaction carrying on for days.
At those levels of power output any chemical power source associated with
the 0.3g wire would be
and the Carolinas,
several days before it made (second) landfall in New Jersey. They called
this area of high pressure anomalous or extremely anomalous or some
words to that effect.
Jeff
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
People who get rich off
They are incredibly evil people. Read this harrowing account of a child
bought up in one of their concentration camps who managed to escape
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/mar/16/escape-north-korea-prison-camp,
China, morally and ethically bankrupt, is totally to blame for their
continued
Just make sure you are an engineer - will need someone to design and
maintain all of the killing machines.
On 28 October 2012 23:31, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I had seen this before.
This must
So if they funded the trip then why didn't they publish any results?
After all they are a charity that is trying to promote and expand LENR
research - and publishing good results would surely help this.
I can only surmise that Defkalion prevented publication, which would
contradict their earlier
I've been disappointed by his claims too many times - with his uncanny
ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory through sloppiness. As
far as most of the world is concerned (and even a lot of people who follow
this closely) until we see independent confirmation this is just more
Accumulated alpha particles from radioactive decay collecting in gas
trapping rock formations. Basically a non-renewable resource after we have
worked through available supplies of shale gas.
Helium can be extracted from the atmosphere - about 5ppm, but will probably
cost ~$5000/kg. Nuclear
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/09/rossi-on-the-safety-of-cop-6/
Admittedly this is from Mr Unreliable, so caveat emptor, but if there are
neutrons being released under some conditions why not all the time?
Neutrons would be really bad news for LENR. Very penetrating and hard to
shield - and
is driven harder or if the
experimental conditions are adjusted in the right way.
Eric
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/09/rossi-on-the-safety-of-cop-6/
Admittedly this is from Mr Unreliable, so caveat emptor
It is all about the way it is written, a patent examination based on LENR
application alone might or might have been rejected, but by including it in
a list alongside more mainstream applications, and concentrating on
material processing side they have found a way to get it through without as
much
OK, I'll bite Why gold coated and why does it need to be of triangular
form? Basically why would that make any positive difference?
Adding gold coating is the antithesis of trying to find a cheap fuel, and
Celani has been doing fine using round wires - also seems that round that
would give
One of the cool things about Ni-H LENR is that it has the potential to make
Bussard Ramjets more feasible (assuming it is H-H fusion as now seems most
likely).
A Bussard Ramjet is a Rocket that scoops up hydrogen from the interstellar
medium using a vast magnetic and/or electrostatic field, then
http://ecatnews.com/?p=2417#comments
quoting from article:
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=svtl=enjs=nprev=_thl=enie=UTF-8layout=2eotf=1u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyteknik.se%2Fnyheter%2Fenergi_miljo%2Fenergi%2Farticle3535258.ece
Investor Group had instructed the SP Technical Research
disappear, he is currently little more than a LENR
saboteur.
On 10 September 2012 15:14, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
And any trust that may have been re-established in Rossi is now totally
destroyed.
No one in his right mind would
were there. And we know
that Rossi has lied on many other occasions too (eg shipment of 1MW unit).
Totally massively untrustworthy.
On 10 September 2012 15:58, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
To what faked results are you referring exactly?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Robert Lynn
reading about the thermal camera:
http://www.optris.com/thermal-imager-pi160?file=tl_files/pdf/Downloads/Infrared%20Cameras/PI_Brochure.pdf
http://www.optris.com/thermal-imager-pi160?file=tl_files/pdf/Downloads/IR-Basics.pdf
Has stated accuracy of +/- 2% which at typical 1000K of Rossi's
Also I note that there is no neutron detection in the radiation measurements
On 9 September 2012 10:29, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.comwrote:
reading about the thermal camera:
http://www.optris.com/thermal-imager-pi160?file=tl_files/pdf/Downloads/Infrared%20Cameras/PI_Brochure.pdf
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/09/high-temperature-e-cat-report-published/
No glaring problems. Though for the life of me I can't work out where the
reactor is in the arrangement - they detail the outer and inner tubes
(which are not the reactors, their mass is consistent with dense 310 SS,
Just realised, if top of reactor was significantly cooler than bottom then
all power calculations would be bollocks. Were there checks done on this
and could the internals have allowed such an uneven heat distribution?
From current results 4-5 times the number of wires (=60-75W) should just
about be self-sustaining, and should probably not run-away.
On 22 August 2012 08:11, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Someone suggested that Celani's device could not handle a much higher
temperature than it
Just how hard would it be to detect if Deuterium is the product in Ni-H
LENR?
I don't have good data on P-P=D fusion, but based on mass difference it
releases about 2.31e-13J/deuteron formed. Assuming that to really produce
a strong Deuterium signal in needs to double in concentration from about
translations:
To err is human, to knowingly persist in error is diabolical.
The mountains will be in labor, and a ridiculous mouse will be brought forth
very apt.
On 20 August 2012 20:23, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking this paper with very mixed feelinga.
Admiration
Is there any way to guesstimate – assuming the best reasonable kind of
insulation is added to retain heat, something like aerogel, etc – how much
more mass of active wire (if any) would be necessary to get close to a
nominally self-sustaining system?
** **
Jones
That would be
Our IC engine testing euphemism for fires and explosions was a thermal
event
On 18 August 2012 14:49, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:40 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Fast Recomb?
Fast recombination of the H2 and O2 back into water and heat.
Neutrons are hard to shield and when absorbed can produce radioactive
materials. Could this be a potentially killer blow to otherwise safe LENR?
Fission reactors typically create up to 10^13 neutrons per cm² per second,
and this experiment was only making about 20 per s, over (I assume) the
From those numbers (30°C room, 120°C at 48W and 140°C when LENR active) I
calculate 16W excess if you assume all radiative heat transfer. But it
will actually be slightly less than that because the hotter tube surface
will convect heat away at a rate that is roughly proportional to the air to
Quick look through. A variety of materials tried with hydrogen and
deuterium. Best results 1-2W per gram of Ni35-Cu8-Zr57 and Hydrogen, at
573K (300°C) running for weeks quite happily. They found adding Cu to NiZr
made it work much better. They are getting far better results than they
get
And another in the economist (in the middle of an 8 minute audio from
Babbage Column prefaced by a discussion on walled gardens), 3:40 on. Very
negative and critical, and probably rather embarrassing to the columnists
in a few months time.
Probably the most sensible solution is that the atmosphere was
significantly thicker. 30% less heat input would drop the earth's
temperature by about 20°C, but 20% more mass of air would increase the
temperature by about 20°C at ground level. We know that during the age of
the dinosaurs that
Wire diameter 0.2mm, 1000mm long gives 0.031cm³, or about 500W/cm³, you
were off by a factor of about 1000. It is likely that not the whole
thickness is active, and this is only early days in development, not even
running at high temperature yet.
On 15 August 2012 02:23, Daniel Rocha
Argh, I meant a factor of 100 (never a good look to cock up your own
arithmetic when correcting someone)
On 15 August 2012 02:32, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Wire diameter 0.2mm, 1000mm long gives 0.031cm³, or about 500W/cm³, you
were off by a factor of about 1000
that
count (in terms of the heat energy from the inner tube).
On 11 August 2012 03:52, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
A technical analysis at last!
On 2012-08-11 04:05, Robert Lynn wrote:
Looks like Rossi has invented a tube furnace,or bought one and coated
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
