Hi,
On 9-2-2013 1:19, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
I disagree, I think Andrea already did prove his claims. The problem
is only that almost nobody seems to understand what is going on.
So Rob, you think Andre has proven his claims in many minds. You
On Feb 9, 2013, at 3:58 AM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
Hi,
On 9-2-2013 1:19, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
I disagree, I think Andrea already did prove his claims. The
problem is only that almost nobody seems to understand what is
going on.
So Rob,
Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
In my opinion is what Andrea has discovered to good to be true and
therefore most people won't accept Andrea's findings, even when it bites
them in their noses.
I disagree. Many people would believe him without reservations if he would
only do a
It seems LENUCO might be up to get funding from ARPA-E. Maybe. First he'll
need enough votes.
http://futureenergy.ultralightstartups.com/campaign/detail/861
Hi,
Thanks for the info, it can never be mentioned often enough :-) .
Kind regards,
Rob
George Miley tries the Way of Technology, excellent!
Peter
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the info, it can never be mentioned often enough :-) .
Kind regards,
Rob
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
On 2013-02-08 11:49, Moab Moab wrote:
It seems LENUCO might be up to get funding from ARPA-E. Maybe. First
he'll need enough votes.
http://futureenergy.ultralightstartups.com/campaign/detail/861
It would have been in LENUCO's best interest to let people know about
this in advance!
What a
Akira, the votes are coming in fairly quick now, just 4 hours ago the
counter was at 18, now we're past 80.
If anything this will show the LENR supporters across the internet forums
what we are capable of.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
On
You do not have to use Linked In for this vote. Enter you name at the
bottom and the bot will send you an e-mail.
As Akira said, it is a shame they did not publicize this earlier.
- Jed
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Moab Moab moab2...@googlemail.com wrote:
It seems LENUCO might be up to get funding from ARPA-E. Maybe. First he'll
need enough votes.
http://futureenergy.ultralightstartups.com/campaign/detail/861
Funding is not conditional upon getting enough votes. It does,
OK, guys, what is #($*#$ is going on here?
If Miley has what he claims to have -- a system that consistently produces
power with no input power -- isn't it GAME OVER regarding Norman Ramsey's
statement in the preamble of the DoE's cold fusion report that stated:
Ordinarily, new scientific
Well said James. We have three other companies claiming to have
commercial generators of power. Each of these claims is based on
dubious demonstrations. What is the Miley claim based on? Can we
expect his claim to be debated and examined in the way the Rossi claim
has experienced? Just
we are above 100 , at this speed it is victory...
I've networked via linked-in, via office, via mail...
the only needed number of vote is 380...
2013/2/8 Moab Moab moab2...@googlemail.com
Akira, the votes are coming in fairly quick now, just 4 hours ago the
counter was at 18, now we're past
Hey Moab, thanks for the update. i'll post it up and let's get this guy
some votes!
Ruby
On 2/8/13 2:49 AM, Moab Moab wrote:
It seems LENUCO might be up to get funding from ARPA-E. Maybe. First
he'll need enough votes.
http://futureenergy.ultralightstartups.com/campaign/detail/861
--
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
We have three other companies claiming to have commercial generators of
power. Each of these claims is based on dubious demonstrations. What is the
Miley claim based on?
Not even a dubious demonstration, as far as I know. No demonstration at all.
The sarcasm is appreciated, Jed. But seriously, are we in the field
free to propose money be spent on any claim regardless of its
reality? If so, how can anyone trust what we say about other claims
or about the reality of LENR in general? May a spokesman for CF
support any idea
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
The sarcasm is appreciated, Jed.
I am glad someone recognizes it as such.
But seriously, are we in the field free to propose money be spent on any
claim regardless of its reality? If so, how can anyone trust what we say
about other claims or about
Yes, by all means give George a chance to be heard. Nevertheless, I
think that all proposals need to be treated with the same level of
skepticism. Rossi, for example, is required to PROVE his claims,
which he has not done in many minds. I suggest George needs to do the
same before we in
Edmund, why not pitch your proposed research program so we can vote with a
clear conscience?
https://ultralight.wufoo.com/forms/future-energy-application-form/
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Yes, by all means give George a chance to be heard.
Good idea. However I think I have a better chance of getting support
from private sources. My only concern is how the field presents its
claims to the world. This submission is one of the ways. I think it is
useless as a source of funding but it is going to be noticed. Many
different
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Yes, by all means give George a chance to be heard. Nevertheless, I think
that all proposals need to be treated with the same level of skepticism.
Rossi, for example, is required to PROVE his claims, which he has not done
in many minds.
If Rossi
I feel those relative skepticism a bit strange and unjustified.
If you read all the project they are mainstream but very risky/uncertain.
The project of Miley is not interesting because of LENR... it is the less
uncertain part, and if Miley cannot make his technology work he can ask
DGT, Rossi,
Hi,
On 8-2-2013 22:38, Edmund Storms wrote:
Yes, by all means give George a chance to be heard. Nevertheless, I
think that all proposals need to be treated with the same level of
skepticism. Rossi, for example, is required to PROVE his claims, which
he has not done in many minds. I suggest
On Feb 8, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Rob Dingemans wrote:
Hi,
On 8-2-2013 22:38, Edmund Storms wrote:
Yes, by all means give George a chance to be heard. Nevertheless, I
think that all proposals need to be treated with the same level of
skepticism. Rossi, for example, is required to PROVE his
24 matches
Mail list logo
