[Vo]:CF alternative

YouTube.com/watch?v=Z8yW5cyXXRc

Re: [Vo]:Proceedings of the 19th Meeting of Japan CF Research Society JCF19

wrote: Anyone who wants something translated should get it done by someone who's > first > language is the target language, and who's second language is the source > language. > It is a problem, isn't it? When people have to read a paragraph two or three times because it is poorly written, they

Re: [Vo]:Proceedings of the 19th Meeting of Japan CF Research Society JCF19

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 3 Jun 2019 20:04:14 -0400: Hi Jed, [snip] Anyone who wants something translated should get it done by someone who's first language is the target language, and who's second language is the source language. The reason being that it's much easier to read

[Vo]:Proceedings of the 19th Meeting of Japan CF Research Society JCF19

See: http://jcfrs.org/file/jcf19-proceedings.pdf Other Proceedings: http://jcfrs.org/proc_jcf.html

[Vo]:Fw: CF/LANR Colloquium at MIT 2019 - update Feb 1

From: Dr. Mitchell Swartz Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 5:04 PM To: Brian Ahern Subject: CF/LANR Colloquium at MIT 2019 - update Feb 1 -- Vortex Update February 1, 2019 The 2019 Cold Fusion/LANR Colloquium at MIT (Cambridge, MA) March 23-24

[Vo]:LENR/CF and Pollack's book THE FOURTH HASE OF WATER

years. Clearly, the exclusion zones interact with background radiation and this has never been accurately detailed and discussed. I think there are many more opportunities presented by this new understanding of water in various environments, that CF/LENR has provided

[Vo]:RE: CF/LENR Data is based on Mel MIles' efforts

identified dissolved He IMHO. Bob Cook From: Brian Ahern<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 7:27 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: [Vo]:CF/LENR Data is based on Mel MIles' efforts I expect the work was well done. He mea

[Vo]:CF/LENR Data is based on Mel MIles' efforts

I expect the work was well done. He measured levels at parts/billion against a background of parts per million. The diffusion rates of helium into the container was calculated as being negligible even at those very low levels. What about helium dissolved in the D2O electrolyte? Was there any

[Vo]:FW: CF/LANR/LENR Colloquium

From: Dr. Mitchell Swartz The first ad hoc CF/LANR/LENR Colloquium of this year will be at noon, January 12, 2018 at MIT, Cambridge, Friday. If any CF/LANR/LENR experimentalist is interested in contributing, and also presenting some of their ongoing CF/LANR efforts, send email to me or Peter

Re: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

Jack Cole wrote: Jones, > > Good find. Reading the translated comments, there are some good points. > You mean the comments below the YouTube version of the video. Yes, there are some interesting comments. Google translate does a fantastic job translating them. It seems to

Re: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Jack Cole wrote: Good find. Reading the translated comments, there are some good points. > Specifically, the hydrogen conducts heat at a much higher rate to the > quartz outer tube. Thus, the nickel wire is not as bright under hydrogen. > I

Re: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

Jones Beene wrote: This video reports on the same device and is apparently several months old. > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31_9ryU7xyw > > Okay, a contact link at the video lists: Laboratory of Experimental Physics "TET", Ukraine, Zaporozhye Experimental

Re: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

Eric, I think it means that at the same power input level, more heat would be conducted away from the heating element into the water giving the appearance of a greater power output. I think the only way this could be true is if more heat conducts out of the ends of the quartz tubes (instead of

Re: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

One reason why the LENR reaction is active in this experiment is because quartz was used as the reactor enclosure. Quartz is a hexagonal crystal. This shape crystal is friendly to the LENR reaction. In the Francesco Celani experiment, the hottest temperature was found on the mica support.

Re: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

Jack, On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Jack Cole wrote: The same amount of power must be dissipated in both conditions assuming the > same input power. The only path I see to a false result is that there are > different heat conduction paths comparing the hydrogen to air

Re: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

Eric, Yes it is. Something interesting is taking place here. I watched the video again. There was a subtitle that might resolve some of the issues: "Measurements showed heating 7 liters of circulating water for 180 seconds. In the air by 2 degrees. Under a hydrogen atmosphere (1 bar) by 3

[Vo]:new CF experiments?

There are English subtitles. 1.5 COP noted at one point. TiH2 used for hydrogen production. 2 to 2.5 COP noted later. It would be nice to get more details. Maybe they are not using powder, but attribute the excess heat to the nickel wire used?

RE: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

This video reports on the same device and is apparently several months old. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31_9ryU7xyw Peter may know the experimenter as the link appeared on his blog. From: Jed Rothwell Jack Cole wrote: TiH2 used for hydrogen production. 2 to 2.5 COP

Re: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

One reason why the LENR reaction is active in this experiment is because quartz was used as the enclosure. Quartz is a hexagonal crystal. THis shape crystal is friendly to the LENR reaction. On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Jack Cole

Re: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

Jack Cole wrote: TiH2 used for hydrogen production. 2 to 2.5 COP noted later. It would be > nice to get more details. Maybe they are not using powder, but attribute > the excess heat to the nickel wire used? > The title at the beginning says "Calorimetric measurement of

Re: [Vo]:new CF experiments?

Jones, Good find. Reading the translated comments, there are some good points. Specifically, the hydrogen conducts heat at a much higher rate to the quartz outer tube. Thus, the nickel wire is not as bright under hydrogen. Heat has to go somewhere. If this alternative explanation is true,

Re: [Vo]:what would our much regretted friends say about CF today?

easy, doesn't it? On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Kevin, I am speaking about some of my very best CF friends whom I met in real life too, not only on the Net and who had died young. How would they judge the situation today? I am making my

Re: [Vo]:what would our much regretted friends say about CF today?

some of my very best CF friends whom I met in real life too, not only on the Net and who had died young. How would they judge the situation today? I am making my own predictions, however I am waiting for facts and certainties I think your chances to win a prize with your Essay at FQXI have

Re: [Vo]:what would our much regretted friends say about CF today?

Dear Kevin, I am speaking about some of my very best CF friends whom I met in real life too, not only on the Net and who had died young. How would they judge the situation today? I am making my own predictions, however I am waiting for facts and certainties I think your chances to win a prize

Re: [Vo]:what would our much regretted friends say about CF today?

becomes easy, doesn't it? On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Kevin, I am speaking about some of my very best CF friends whom I met in real life too, not only on the Net and who had died young. How would they judge the situation today? I am making my

[Vo]:what would our much regretted friends say about CF today?

This is an appeal to my readers- can you help me in analyzing and predicting what will happen to/in/with our Field. Just now, hope comes only from outside classic CF. This time I hope to have many answers from you, I dare to think that you still CARE. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http

Re: [Vo]:what would our much regretted friends say about CF today?

come from outside classic CF. Please elaborate with an emphasis on clarity. On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote: This is an appeal to my readers- can you help me in analyzing and predicting what will happen to/in/with our Field. Just now, hope comes only

[Vo]:More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. Positive reviews of Prof. Arata's work on LENR/CF

Particle Physics http://vixra.org/abs/1404.0314 There appears to be a growing consensus in the scientific and engineering communities that LENR/CF is real. Kind Regards walker

Re: [Vo]:More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. Positive reviews of Prof. Arata's work on LENR/CF

Well, I wouldn't call Smarandache a very mainstream scientist... perhaps I'd say he is less mainstream than CF researchers... 2014-04-18 5:15 GMT-03:00 Ian Glen Walker walker...@gmail.com: Hi all More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. A paper positively reviewing the work

Re: [Vo]:More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. Positive reviews of Prof. Arata's work on LENR/CF

: “Unleashing the Quark Within: Lenr, Klein-Gordon Equation, and Elementary Particle Physics” http://vixra.org/abs/1404.0314 There appears to be a growing consensus in the scientific and engineering communities that LENR/CF is real. This is a theory paper. As Norman Ramsey pointed out

Re: [Vo]:More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. Positive reviews of Prof. Arata's work on LENR/CF

communities that LENR/CF is real. This is a theory paper. As Norman Ramsey pointed out in his preamble to the DoE's original review of cold fusion: However, even a *single* short but valid cold fusion period would be revolutionary. If you can't get scientists to look at the experimental data, you

[Vo]:2014 CF/LANR Colloquium all files page

We are assembling a page for all 2014 CF/LANR Colloquium at MIT audio, video, .pdfs, and links to affiliated institutions: http://coldfusionnow.org/interviews/2014-cflanr-colloquium-at-mit-full-coverage/ New material will be added here as they are available throughout the week (or two

[Vo]:The 2014 Colloquium on CF/LANR at MIT

March 21-23, 2014 - The 2014 Colloquium on CF/LANR at MIT http://peswiki.com/index.php/Event:The_2014_Colloquium_on_CF/LANR_at_MIT_--_25th_Anniversary An impressive list of speakers.

[Vo]:More CF/LENR patent applications

Hello group, You might want to watch this page for new ones in the short/medium term: http://www.google.com/patents/sitemap/en/Sitemap/G21/G21B/G21B_3.html Recently added (Publication date: Jul 25, 2013): * * * Yogendra Narain SRIVASTAVA, Allan Widom Nuclear reactor consuming

[Vo]:Could organizations like ALEC destroy CF/LENR's chances?

If CF/LENR technology finally manages to get off the ground in the commercial sense it may still face a very difficult uphill political battle. It's possible obscure organizations, like ALEC, American Legislative Exchange Council, may try their best to destroy cold fusion's commercial potential

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

What I have understood is that momentum conservation is a shortcut, uncounscious to free space physicists. It mean gamma as one particle to compensate momentum. In lattice, momentum can be dissipated in many way, moreover particles are so bound to other particle that the allowed

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

If Kim et al have now explained CF then there is nothing left for me to say on this subject. Harry On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote: What I have understood is that momentum conservation is a shortcut, uncounscious to free space physicists. It mean

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

There is a long way to go yet. Dr. Szilard patented the nuclear reaction back in the 1930s. These was a lot to do after that point in nuclear energy development. On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: If Kim et al have now explained CF then there is nothing

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks. Take your time, but it would be nice to read the source. The headings that set out the three miracles in his book are (pp. 111-13):

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: Does he classify them as miracles because he considers them impossible or extremely improbable? My impression only, but he seems to use the term miracle to highlight what is in his view fanciful thinking on the part of

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Quantum Mechanics allows for things to happen that are contrary to every viewpoint of reality and common sense. What happens inside an NI/H reactor is not of this universe. It is understandable that people living in this universe to rejects the LENR universe. Even outstanding true believer

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Those miracles could be translated in Cowboy language : People who have seen animal in the sky are drunk because 1- no cow have wing 2- even with wings flying cows would dump bullshit and you will find some on the roofs 3- you should find linear tracks of cows running to take-off This what

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

No cow ever shits bull shit. They always shit cow shit. Therefore your reasoning is flawed. On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote: Those miracles could be translated in Cowboy language : People who have seen animal in the sky are drunk because 1- no

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Ah ah 8-) sorry I'm only an engineer... by the good example of how patho-skeptics deny critics ! 2013/6/8 Roger Bird bachc...@gmail.com No cow ever shits bull shit. They always shit cow shit. Therefore your reasoning is flawed. On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Alain Sepeda

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

From: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2013 12:46:32 PM 3- you should find linear tracks of cows running to take-off Bull feathers! 3A : Cows just blow up with Methane and float away like a balloon. 3B : Cows fill with methane (as in 3A) .. but it is expelled

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

somehow. However, if ,as you say, he is certain that CF is impossible because it violates the conservation of momentum why does he go through this exercise? Since certain key pieces of evidence are missing which would make the phenomena obey conservation of momentum, he is duty bound by his faith

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

been disguised, altered or hidden somehow. Possibly. If I had to guess, however, I'd guess that he's just being a little facetious in his use of terminology -- i.e., he's saying concealed in an ironic sense. I could be mistaken, though. However, if ,as you say, he is certain that CF

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

ah... pet theories... (most french knowing english, and reciprocal should die of laughing). (fr:pet= en:fart) 2013/6/8 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com From: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2013 12:46:32 PM 3- you should find linear tracks of cows running to

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

In the standard model, E=MC2, and the neutrino account for the Energy and momentum conservation. The same rules apply for LENR. If something does not add up, just add a new field like the Higgs or the Higgs boson. Or maybe super-symmetric particles might be required. Maybe LENR will require the

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Unfortunately, even though Y E Kim engaged with me in the past, he seems to have chosen not to engage on this particular subject, wherein his theory is given a leg up. Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com May 27 (10 days ago) to Yeong Hello Dr. Kim: It would seem that your BEC theory has gotten

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

; Roberto Germano; Roy Virgilio; Steven Krivit; Sunwon Park; Tsirlin, Mark; vlad; VORTEX *Subject:* [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change ** ** *Prof. Yeong Kim interviewed*: a veteran finally gets optimistic following a technological breakthrough. Please see

RE: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Thanks for the clarification. -mi From: Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 11:42 PM To: VORTEX Subject: Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change No dear Mark, this is a modest blog, an average of 150 views per day I don't want

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Great interview Peter (and response to Mary). Thank you for sharing with us. As i started learning about the LENR field Dr. Kim's papers were some of the first I ever came across and as an amateur I did not fully comprehend a majority of what i read but never the less enjoyed reading them all

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Yeong is a great scientist and he is very generous and friendly. And he has great courage and takes responsibilty- he is an authority in two fields of physics and even more. You can now find all his papers at the iste of his University mentioned in the Interview.. His presenation at ICCF-18 will

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Peter, Kim says Huizenga's three miracles are: (1) suppression of the DD Coulomb repulsion (Gamow factor) * * (2) no production of nuclear products (D+D → n+ 3He, etc.) (3) the violation of the momentum conservation in free space In other places I have seen Huizenga three miracles written like

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

are'nt gamma the way to compensate momentum ? and neutron the expected nuclear products? by the way I appreciate the way yeong kim explain why lattice is not free space : even though I clearly recognized that the conventional nuclear scattering theory at positive energies cannot directly be

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Probbably Huizenga himself has used different variants, this is like folklore. I confees I have not read the Huizenga and Taubes books, have seen them when visting at Gene Mallove's office in 1998 but I was not too interested- they were discussed over and over. Peter On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:15

RE: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

In contrast, the only miracle required for a version of the Rydberg redundancy explanation (redundant electron ground state) is that it happens at all… since everything else is standard physics. … or stated another way – it would be a miracle in itself if the experimental proof offered

RE: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Jones Does Rydberg redundancy explanation (redundant electron ground state) = IRH? Fran From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 2:24 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

RE: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Yes. From: Roarty, Francis X Does Rydberg redundancy explanation (redundant electron ground state) = IRH? Fran From: Jones Beene In contrast, the only miracle required for a version of the Rydberg redundancy explanation (redundant electron ground state) is that it happens at

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

Either Kim incorrectly quotes Huizenga's book or the second ( and more popular?) version misrepresents Huizenga's three miracles. Somebody with a copy of Huizenga's book could this settle this issue quickly. Harry On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 12:29:30 PM Somebody with a copy of Huizenga's book could this settle this issue quickly. I have an early edition (he revised it later) but it's in my office and I won't be there until early next week.

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:15:46 -0400: Hi, If particle emission doesn't relieve the excited nucleus of its energy (#2), then some other means is required. If that is not gamma emission (and the gammas are clearly absent), then the assumption appears to be that the

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

If He took off by itself, how fast would it be moving? Detecting and measuring the speed of He particles would be a way checking for a conservation of momentum violation. harry On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 7 Jun 2013

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote: From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 12:29:30 PM Somebody with a copy of Huizenga's book could this settle this issue quickly. I have an early edition (he revised it later) but it's in

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: If He took off by itself, how fast would it be moving? Detecting and measuring the speed of He particles would be a way checking for a conservation of momentum violation. As an amateur following the field, this is my

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks. Take your time, but it would be nice to read the source. The headings that set out the three miracles in his book are (pp. 111-13): 1. Fusion-rate miracle 2. Branching-ratio miracle 3.

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

I wrote: For (2), he's talking about how you'd have to significantly decrease the rate of the d+d→3He+p and d+d→t+n branches, which are normally ~50 percent each Typo -- that should read, d+d→3He+n and d+d→t+p branches. Eric

[Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

*Prof. Yeong Kim interviewed*: a veteran finally gets optimistic following a technological breakthrough. Please see: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/a-veterans-voice.html -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

From: Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 8:14:45 PM Prof. Yeong Kim interviewed : a veteran finally gets optimistic following a technological breakthrough. Please see: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/06/a-veterans-voice.html A great interview ... and

RE: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change

; Gabriel Moagar-Poladian; Gary; Haiko Lietz; jeff aries; Lewan Mats; Nicolaie N. Vlad; Peter Mobberley; Pierre Clauzon; Roberto Germano; Roy Virgilio; Steven Krivit; Sunwon Park; Tsirlin, Mark; vlad; VORTEX Subject: [Vo]:A 1989er CF scientist committed to paradigm change Prof. Yeong Kim interviewed

Re: [Vo]:explaining CF

The mechanism must logically explain how He4, tritium, and transmutation are produced without energetic radiation being detected. ***A couple of years back I thought EN Tsyganov was onto something. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Cold%20nuclear%20fusion.pdf 4. THE PROBLEM OF

[Vo]:Re: CMNS: explaining CF

A major issue keeps being ignored. The effect CAN NOT occur unless a basic change is made in the a material. You can apply all the laser energy or RF frequency you want, but nothing will happen until a critical change occurs, which I call the NAE. Ordinary materials are not active without

Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: explaining CF

A major issue keeps being ignored. The effect CAN NOT occur unless a basic change is made in the material. You can apply all the laser energy or RF frequency you want, but nothing will happen until a critical change occurs, which I call the NAE. It all depends on how you consider the material.

Re: [Vo]:explaining CF

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: One thing that comes to mind right away is the transition from a metastable nucleus to a stable nucleus by way of the emission of a gamma-ray photon. Sometimes in a fusion you get one or more metastable states rather

[Vo]:explaining CF

I would like to provide some advice to people attempting to explain LENR. This advice comes from someone who has studied the subject for the 23 years, who has an extensive background in chemistry and physics, and who has read almost every paper about the subject. I believe new ideas in

Re: [Vo]:explaining CF

Great post Ed! I've thought along those same lines as well (as I'm sure many bright people have). I won't say that CF theory require miracles, but it does require something very unusual an unique. We already have one unique aspect; that being the Hydrated Metal. Astronomic properties

Re: [Vo]:explaining CF

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote: 2. What mechanism can drain the mass-energy away from a collection of hydrogen nuclei before the final nucleus is formed? This question seems to imply that a quantum of energy (the eventual mass deficit to 4He) can be

Re: [Vo]:explaining CF

I wrote: This question seems to imply that a quantum of energy (the eventual mass deficit to 4He) can be broken up into smaller pieces. It would be interesting to look at other examples of this kind of thing. One thing that comes to mind right away is the transition from a metastable nucleus

Re: [Vo]:Amusing analysis of CF/LENR in the world

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote: Never ascribe to evil what can be ascribed to stupidity. Better and usually more applicable is the trope: Never ascribe to mere stupidity that which can be ascribed to unenlightened self-interest.

Re: [Vo]:Amusing analysis of CF/LENR in the world

not actually stop research and funding, it was merely crippled, and the blackout in journals was only in a few journals. It happened to be the journals that most *physicists* thought should be places to publish CF results, but ... wait a minute! This wasn't physics, this was *chemistry

Re: [Vo]:Amusing analysis of CF/LENR in the world

Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote: One of the common pseudoskeptical arguments is that cold fusion believers believe that cold fusion was suppressed. The picture conveyed is that of wild-eyed conspiracy theorists. However, with *very little conspiracy,* cold fusion *was*

Re: [Vo]:Amusing analysis of CF/LENR in the world

At 11:20 AM 11/9/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote: I have a friend, very smart guy, who I've been working on over time with occasional CF/LENR tidbits and arguments. Lately he wrote this, and gave me permission to send it along. Perhaps this response will help your friend. So, let's identify all

Re: [Vo]:Amusing analysis of CF/LENR in the world

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote: (The claims of public demonstrations by Rossi are *all* marred, so far, by possible error or fraud modes that were overlooked at the time, and Rossi has consistently refused support by people like Jed Rothwell, who

[Vo]:Amusing analysis of CF/LENR in the world

I have a friend, very smart guy, who I've been working on over time with occasional CF/LENR tidbits and arguments. Lately he wrote this, and gave me permission to send it along. - - - So, let's identify all the groups involved here, from the seekers to the suckers. :-) We have the seekers

RE: [Vo]:Amusing analysis of CF/LENR in the world

: Friday, November 09, 2012 8:21 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Amusing analysis of CF/LENR in the world I have a friend, very smart guy, who I've been working on over time with occasional CF/LENR tidbits and arguments. Lately he wrote this, and gave me permission to send it along

Re: [Vo]:Amusing analysis of CF/LENR in the world

Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: We have the naysayer scientists who just know it isn't possible, and dismiss anything without such inspection, just as I wouldn't spend too much time looking over a new perpetual motion machine. Can't be done, don't waste anyone's time. They cause

Re: [Vo]:Best tasting CF/LENR quotes through history.

Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sun, Sep 9, 2012 5:08 pm Subject: [Vo]:Best tasting CF/LENR quotes through history. Just in case this all pans out the way we hope, I think it would be great to assemble the historical quotes about CF/LENR that would taste best when eaten

Re: [Vo]:Best tasting CF/LENR quotes through history.

...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sun, Sep 9, 2012 5:08 pm Subject: [Vo]:Best tasting CF/LENR quotes through history. Just in case this all pans out the way we hope, I think it would be great to assemble the historical quotes about CF/LENR that would taste best when eaten

Re: [Vo]:Best tasting CF/LENR quotes through history.

I have audio quotes on my web page. http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter1.html -Original Message- From: Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Mon, Sep 10, 2012 3:03 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Best tasting CF/LENR quotes through history. Sorry, I

[Vo]:Best tasting CF/LENR quotes through history.

Just in case this all pans out the way we hope, I think it would be great to assemble the historical quotes about CF/LENR that would taste best when eaten, if you know what I mean. Someone might already have done this, in which case a pointer is fine. Otherwise, hoping for quotes that can

Re: [Vo]:Best tasting CF/LENR quotes through history.

10, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote: Just in case this all pans out the way we hope, I think it would be great to assemble the historical quotes about CF/LENR that would taste best when eaten, if you know what I mean. Someone might already have done this, in which case

Re: [Vo]:Best tasting CF/LENR quotes through history.

to assemble the historical quotes about CF/LENR that would taste best when eaten, if you know what I mean. Someone might already have done this, in which case a pointer is fine. Otherwise, hoping for quotes that can be attributed. Jeff -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http

[Vo]:NIWeek2012 slides - Status of CMNS/CF/LENR Research at Kobe-Technova

policy for submitted slides [1] - the company logo appears everywhere. https://decibel.ni.com/content/servlet/JiveServlet/download/23750-1-51320/TS9240%20Status%20of%20CMN%20CF%20LENR%20Research.pdf Source: https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-23750 Status of CMNS/CF/LENR Research at Kobe

Re: [Vo]:NIWeek2012 slides - Status of CMNS/CF/LENR Research at Kobe-Technova

://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-23750 Status of CMNS/CF/LENR Research at Kobe-Technova The Kobe-Technova team has worked to elucidate the underlying physics of anomalous heat evolution effects in deuterium (D) and protium (H) gas-loaded nano-metal-compound systems. Basic tools are the twin D

[Vo]:CNBC-60 Minutes- CF- Feedback via Facebook

Greetings Vortex, IF anyone wished to leave a comment on CNBC Facebook concerning the Cold Fusion Program: http://www.facebook.com/cnbcsmart Ron Kita, Chiralex I have posted a few comments on an update.

RE: [Vo]:Oil Price.com features Brillouin CF Reactor

The photoelectric effect won’t work, Eric - unless you include this as a premise http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_theory_of_light … which is an interesting solution in a way. That is probably what you had in mind. The next best short answer is the known physics of electron

Re: [Vo]:Oil Price.com features Brillouin CF Reactor

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: The photoelectric effect won’t work, Eric - unless you include this as a premise ** ** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_theory_of_light ** ** … which is an interesting solution in a way. That is

[Vo]:Oil Price.com features Brillouin CF Reactor

Greetings All, In case that you haven t see this before: http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/New-LENR-Machine-is-the-Best-Yet.html Respectfully, Ron Kita, Chiralex

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Oil Price.com features Brillouin CF Reactor

: Ron Kita [mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 7:07 AM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Oil Price.com features Brillouin CF Reactor Greetings All, In case that you haven t see this before: http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/New-LENR-Machine-is-the-Best-Yet.html

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >