In reply to grok's message of Mon, 4 May 2009 20:55:19 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I know nothing about your reactor, Robin. If you feel like describing it
here, I wouldn't mind following along. But remember: I'm no rocket
scientist, like youse all.
[snip]
I'm no rocket scientist either. My reactor would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
I know nothing about your reactor, Robin. If you feel like describing it
here, I wouldn't mind following along. But remember: I'm no rocket
utilities which generate a lot of CO2,
Mike Carrell
--
- Original Message -
From: grok g...@resist.ca
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Wind energy breakthrough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In reply to grok's message of Tue, 5 May 2009 00:58:45 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I'm no rocket scientist either. My reactor would either use deuterium or
hydrogen, according to the reactions previously described here:-
D + D - He4 (with luck), otherwise D + D - T + P
-
MC: see comments thus set apart. Mike Carrell
- Original Message -
From: mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Wind energy breakthrough
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 3 May 2009 20:23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Which is exactly why there are immediate gains for a world-wide energy
grid: there are no 'off-peak' hours, there. It's always 'High Noon'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:22 PM, grok g...@resist.ca wrote:
Surely there must be a simple teknology in the pipeline which will
allow the storage of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
One might expect any chemical battery to have a cost in the same
ballpark as lead-acid batteries, and molten salt has the potential to
be far
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
My comment was in part to remind everyone of BLP technology. The 100 x
gain in energy yield from H is real and demonstrated years ago. The
potential COP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
My comment was in part to remind everyone of BLP technology. The 100 x
gain in energy yield from H is real and demonstrated years ago.
That's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
MC:You have a closer understanding of the experiment that most on this
list. The quantity of H2 flowing thorugh the cell is accurately metered
as is the
In reply to grok's message of Mon, 4 May 2009 10:58:25 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
But, 'hydrino' tek aside: what would be the advantages of using hydrogen
vs. molten salts here..?
[snip]
I'm sure this list is by no means exhaustive:-
Molten salts are highly corrosive, thus containment and maintenance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Jeff Fink rev...@ptd.net
mounted the barricade and roared out:
The concept of a world wide grid is practically an oxymoron. Whereas
the electrical line losses of high tension transmission lines are
economically acceptable
In reply to grok's message of Mon, 4 May 2009 11:54:13 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Isn't there research on (tough!) materials which absorb hi-energy/
hi-intensity photons from across the relevant spektrum, directly into
their electron structures..?
[snip]
...yes. Icosahedral borides have a self-healing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
I was thinking about the time that there is very little land mass in
daylight, i.e. when the sun is over the Pacific.
I see. However, nobody is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Isn't there research on (tough!) materials which absorb hi-energy/
hi-intensity photons from across the relevant spektrum, directly into
their electron
In reply to grok's message of Mon, 4 May 2009 11:02:19 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
One thing I haven't understood about all this (because I only dabble in
this stuff): do the 'reduced' hydrinos regain energy from the ambient
environment, after having given up useful work to humans beings..? Or is
this some
In reply to grok's message of Mon, 4 May 2009 17:13:12 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Besides -- this configuration sounds sub-optimal to me, really. Does this
process actually require an unstructured plasma?
[snip]
..perhaps not. In fact it may also be what is going on in the structured
plasma that exists in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Hydrinos can a) form hydrino molecules, b) catalyze H atoms, c)
catalyze other hydrinos, and d) revert to H, with transfer of enough
energy. They do not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
grok, the ideas for handling a plasma stretch over decades and I can't
summarize them here.
Sure you can. Or someone can.
In general, Mills'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Besides -- this configuration sounds sub-optimal to me, really. Does
this process actually require an unstructured plasma?
..perhaps not. In fact
In reply to grok's message of Mon, 4 May 2009 18:54:45 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
So at some point they give off x-rays -- before they give off gamma
radiation. Loox like the possibility of 'easy' CF from another angle
entirely.
[snip]
Easy CF from another angle indeed. It's what my reactor is based
In reply to grok's message of Mon, 4 May 2009 19:05:05 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
There we go. I can buy that.
;
Now I need to understand that process a little more.
[snip]
You can get a quick intro from my web page at
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Hydrinos_explained.html when you are done with
that,
grok wrote:
Isn't there research on (tough!) materials which absorb hi-energy/
hi-intensity photons from across the relevant spektrum, directly into
their electron structures..?
--Mike Carrell:
Mills has explored many schemes for extracting energy from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
So at some point they give off x-rays -- before they give off gamma
radiation. Loox like the possibility of 'easy' CF from another angle
entirely.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, thomas malloy temall...@usfamily.net
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Surely there has to be a method to sweep the plasma around and drink all
that energy up -- good, down to the last drop. Why not place rotating
Kiril
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
blows strongly in the Prairie States). This is why solar makes sense,
since even at $1 watt for the solar cell - the electricity costs 4-6
times more than from a coal plant.
But is this the actual, real cost of coal power? Seems to me they're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
.. does it make sense to design the windmill, and the wind farm - from
the git-go to make only hydrogen, which is storable, even if not
easily storable and transportable via pipelines (if they are designed
to avoid embrittlement)?
And people
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:12 AM, grok g...@resist.ca wrote:
What _is_ the present efficiency of coal/hydro/nuclear power that is
now being delivered by hi-tension towers, BTW..?
About 92%:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission
Terry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
mounted the barricade and roared out:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 10:12 AM, grok g...@resist.ca wrote:
What _is_ the present efficiency of coal/hydro/nuclear power that is
now being delivered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Lawrence de Bivort ldebiv...@earthlink.net
mounted the barricade and roared out:
Virtually ALL cost-accounting ignores secondary and tertiary effects of
an operation, even though some of these might easily outweigh the cost
Wind energy breakthroughBlackLightpower has demonstrated by water bath
caolrimetry that the blacklight power reactions can extract from gaseous
hydrogen 100 times the energy of combustion. This, plus improvements in the
efficiency of electrolytic production of hydrogen, can significantly
AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Wind energy breakthrough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
blows strongly in the Prairie States). This is why solar makes sense,
since even at $1 watt for the solar cell - the electricity costs 4-6
times more than from a coal plant
- Original Message
From: Terry Blanton
About 92% [transmission and distribution eff]
Yes but looked at another way that is 8% loss which is on top of the thermal
efficiency of the plant, correct? IOW a coal plant operating at 40% thermal
efficiency would suffer another 8% loss,
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 3 May 2009 13:23:21 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Yes but looked at another way that is 8% loss which is on top of the thermal
efficiency of the plant, correct? IOW a coal plant operating at 40% thermal
efficiency would suffer another 8% loss, compared to
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 3 May 2009 14:49:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Wind energy breakthroughBlackLightpower has demonstrated by water bath
caolrimetry that the blacklight power reactions can extract from gaseous
hydrogen 100 times the energy of combustion. This, plus improvements
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As the smoke cleared, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
mounted the barricade and roared out:
From: Terry Blanton
About 92% [transmission and distribution eff]
Yes but looked at another way that is 8% loss which is on top of the
thermal
In reply to grok's message of Sun, 3 May 2009 15:22:30 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Which is exactly why there are immediate gains for a world-wide energy
grid: there are no 'off-peak' hours, there. It's always 'High Noon'
_somewhere_ on the planet.
[snip]
While this is true, don't forget that about 70% of
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:22 PM, grok g...@resist.ca wrote:
Surely there must be a simple teknology in the pipeline which will allow
the storage of large amounts of electrical power on-site at any power
generation site.
There is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium-sulfur_battery
Terry
electrolysis unit and
use any convenient water for fuel.
Mike Carrell
- Original Message -
From: mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Wind energy breakthrough
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 3 May 2009 14:49:32 -0400:
Hi
In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Sun, 3 May 2009 20:23:41 -0400:
Hi Mike,
[snip]
Reading between the lines, I would say that you don't like what I read between
the lines. ;)
My comment was in part to remind everyone of BLP technology. The 100 x gain
in energy yield from H is real and
41 matches
Mail list logo
