Jed,
My heart goes out to you and any family, extended family, friends and
associates you might know living in Japan. When you can please let us
know the status of Japan from your unique perspective and knowledge
base.
It's my understanding certain nuclear plants have been shut down...
mostly
In Tohoku area of Japan, many people would be killed by earthquake and
tsunami. But, to get exact information about the area is difficult.
Earthquakes continue as follows
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/140_35.php
In the other area, damages are not so big. In Tokyo,
There was a report that an entire passenger train was missing due to
the tsunami.
Also, wasn't Fukushima one of the locations where they first used MOX fuel?
T
See:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3124295.ece
It's my understanding certain nuclear plants have been shut down...
mostly as a precautionary measure. No eminent danger that I've heard
All nuclear plants were shut down safely.
But, the cooling system of a certain reactor was stopped because all
emergency power generators were broken.
The
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
My heart goes out to you and any family, extended family, friends and
associates you might know living in Japan. When you can please let us
know the status of Japan from your unique perspective and knowledge
base.
We have Japanese readers here with a lot
http://framework.latimes.com/2011/03/11/earthquake-and-tsunami-hits-japan/#/
0
Rossi sounds naive at times, but then he says (in this QA session) Sooner
or later we will get competition, and nothing will stop this. It would be
like try to stop the Niagara Falls with an umbrella.
Since he realizes that, I think he should concentrate on getting a patent,
and he should put
A collection of videos:
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/11/video-of-the-earthquake-and-tsunami-in-japan/?hp
That would depend on his motivation and understanding
He may have already rewritten his patents or has realized that there is a lot
of other patent applications in the system. For example I know that I have a
patent in using Ni , H, mixed with refractory oxides/silicates and using
methods to
There is a big problem with that tactic (concentrating on getting a patent
instead of the MW device) - simply put: he does not understand the dynamics
of the process.
If he disclosed the secret materials which are used, a prerequisite for an
enforceable patent, then others with patents on file
Just another excellent opinion being express here... (MINE, of course!)
There seems to be much discussion about tactics and MOs... and,
sigh..., I think we miss the most important point of all.
Much of Rossi's predilections, warts and all, strike me as highly
altruistic in nature. Altruism is a
--
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 10:50 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi on-line QA posted
Just another excellent opinion being express here... (MINE, of course!)
There
As I wrote in my blog, Interestingness is the essence of existence, but
sometimes
it is quite unbearable. I have so many good Japanese friends!
Peter
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
A collection of videos:
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
His prime tactic seems to be aimed at a convincing large scale demo - timed
to coincide with a massive IPO, after which he is willing to walk away as a
rich man if nothing else. Not a bad tactic in a way. This is his fall-back
position.
You mentioned
Dennis den...@netmdc.com wrote:
Yes, I think that many (here) try to always look at the motivation of Rossi
et al, as only being monetary gain. They then do not understand the actions
of Rossi. There are many in this field that are motivated more by altruism
and will gladly give their
Jed sez:
...
As the VISA commercial goes: Priceless.
MasterCard! People like you are the bane of public relations
departments. Here the MasterCard company spends millions to
promote their brand, and you confuse their ads with the
competition's. (That happens all the time.)
Aw shucks,
That's supposed to say I told HIM he should make haste to file another
patent . . .
His response:
BY LAW, YOU CANNOT PATENT A THING THAT OTHERS HAVE ALREADY DONE, EVEN IF
THEY HAVE NOT PATENTED IT.
I think he is wrong about that. If someone here knows a lot about patent
law, please advise.
Yes, you are right. The US changed from the first to invent to the first to
file under Clinton. I disagree with the idea (then and now) but it what we are
under now.
I do not know what his secret is, so I do not know if he is safe or not.
There is a lot of information out there about,
My understanding is that he is NOT correct. It does not matter if someone
else has done it if they have not filed on it. unless it was placed
into public domain. And even then, I think (but not sure) that there is a
window of one year from information release and a patent filing.
So
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/03/america-invents-act-first-to-invent-
and-a-filing-date-focus.html
Problem is - this change has passed the Senate, but is not signed into law.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi on-line QA posted
My understanding is that he
The first to file in the US is assumed the inventor and any others have the
burden of proof
to show that they invented it before hand and taught the method beforehand.
Rossi's obvious problem would then be to show why, if he understood the
method, did not
fully disclose it at the time he made
Dennis wrote:
It would still be in his best interest to fully disclose his methods
in a patent application
(to the degree there was no undo experimentation required by others).
Anything else would lead to a very rough and uncertain road.
Anything else would be a waste of time, in my opinion.
My post never posted! I may have used
vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.commailto:vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com instead of
vortex-l@eskimo.commailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com because it never showed up on
the forum. It was regarding 100g NI powder that Rossi says needs replacement
every 6 months. I was looking
Jones Beene wrote:
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2011/03/america-invents-act-first-to-invent-
and-a-filing-date-focus.html
Problem is - this change has passed the Senate, but is not signed into law.
Thanks for the link. That's helpful. I expect Obama will sign that law
because it does not
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:53:31 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
The strangest photo I have seen is this one:-
http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2011/03/12/1226020/139133-satte-japan-earthquake.jpg
Notice that the yellow line down the middle of the road has been split in two
Hi,
I had a dream this morning. I was looking up into a blue sky at the image of a
huge inflatable globe of the Earth at about 5 ft (complete with lines of
latitude and longitude), that expanded to fill the whole sky. The part that I
could see was South America, and in what appeared to be
Note the video above the new article. It includes additional information.
- Jed
Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Please help me understand the physical arrangement here, We have 5?
Thermistors . . .
No, resistance heaters, not thermistors. Was it 5?
separated in an 1100g mix of some support catalyst Zirconi a? (1kg) and Ni
powder (100g) located in a
First-to-File vs. First-to-Invent: Who Really Benefits from Changing the U.S.
Patent System?
http://tinyurl.com/47mrehh
http://www.generalpatent.com/first-file-vs-first-invent-who-really-benefits-changing-u-s-patent-system
harry
CNN is streaming the broadcast from NHK under LIVE: Daylight arrives in
Japan.
Just now the announcer stopped talking for moment and then announced
that another quake has been detected, and people should move outdoors
and away from dangerous objects.
So their earthquake warning system is in
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:27 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Hi,
I had a dream this morning. I was looking up into a blue sky at the image of a
huge inflatable globe of the Earth at about 5 ft (complete with lines of
latitude and longitude), that expanded to fill the whole sky. The part
The announcer is taking to an expert who is saying: As long as you are
evacuating, it might not be a bad idea to carry a wet handkerchief or
something like that to cover your face. Nothing to be concerned about.
The levels of radiation are too small to have any biological effect.
Everyone
[I sent this before but it did not post . . .]
CNN is streaming the broadcast from NHK under LIVE: Daylight arrives in
Japan.
Just now the announcer stopped talking for moment and then announced
that another quake has been detected, and people should move outdoors
and away from dangerous
A first to publish system might be even better. Filing with the patent office
would
just be a publication option if it is not possible to publish the invention
in some other venue, which is unlikely
in the age of the internet.
In terms of timing, the role of the patent office should be to
Starting at 5:00 p.m. EST CNN has a voice-over interpreter into English.
That must be difficult! The interpreter is doing a good job. I couldn't do
that to save my life.
The few times I tried to interpret I ended up speaking Japanese to the
American and vice versa, a bit like the interpreter
Harry Veeder wrote:
In terms of timing, the role of the patent office should be to decide who
*published* the idea first,
That would be difficult to prove. It is easy to fake a publication.
Especially if you are talking about a printed book anyone can print one now
with a date from five years
From: Jed Rothwell
* Rossi emphatically does not want to give his results away! He has made it
clear on many occasions that he hopes to make a lot of money.
Yes, abundantly clear! In short, the whole altruism thing borders on
laughable according to N.H. connections familiar with this
Fran,
The patent itself specifically mentions having copper tubing internally,
which is the likely source of the so-called transmutation copper (which is
non radioactive but it should have residual counts if Rossi was correct in
thinking it to be a decay product of nickel). The copper which he
The reactor is SCRAMed but the emergency diesel generators are not
working so they cannot send enough cooling water to cool the core.
Radiation levels are ~1000 times normal in the control room.
Like most Japanese nukes, this one right next to the ocean, and cooled
with ocean water.
An
I normally don't remember my dreams but had a very disturbing one a couple
nights ago that I haven't been able to shake. It was about large flocks of
birds flying straight up Into space and merging into huge black mantled
skeletons that swept back down to kill and destroy everything on the
I wrote:
Especially if you are talking about a printed book anyone can print one now
with a date from five years ago.
That is roughly when Print On Demand printing began. It is easy to identify
a perfect-bound Print On Demand book but I doubt anyone can say exactly how
old it is.
You could
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes, abundantly clear! In short, the whole “altruism” thing borders on
laughable according to N.H. connections familiar with this situation, or to
anyone who has closely followed his story, and talked to people who know
Rossi personally.
I think this is
Jones,
Do you feel the tubing is used to exchange heat between the
powder and the coolant? I had assumed the coolant was outside the reactor but
now must consider the tubing instead of external cooling or some combination of
both. [snip] The patent itself specifically mentions
In reply to Dennis's message of Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:25:35 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
The thing I do not understand is that I would have expect people to notice a
pulse of noise from a gas pressure switching system. I wonder if he can do it
without a non-static H2 pressure. I can't do that. I
--
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Subject: [Vo]:P.M. Kan orders evacuation from nuke plant
...
The announcer is now talking about the nuke at Fukushima and the fact that
people within 3 km were ordered to move.
Jones
Regarding thermistors you wrote
[snip] Thermistors, unlike ANY other form of heating that I know of (like
resistance tape heating) do NOT require dedicated thermocouple feedback.
That is most important, since thermistors can be controlled by monitoring
their own impedance characteristics,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The announcer is taking to an expert who is saying: As long as you are
evacuating, it might not be a bad idea to carry a wet handkerchief or
something like that to cover your face. Nothing to be concerned about. The
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Fukushima reactor 3 has plutonium fuel as an ingredient.
Hmmm ... the name itself is evocative of some kind of cosmic jokester ...
Susanoo strikes twice ?
My new version is up at :
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_v302.php
Unfortunately, my conclusion is :
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Since the December/January experiments only recorded the inputs and
outputs for a short time (30 minutes), almost ANY of the fakes could have
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Fukushima reactor 3 has plutonium fuel as an ingredient.
Hmmm ... the name itself is evocative of some kind of cosmic jokester ...
Susanoo strikes twice ?
Fuk you shiva?
From: Alan J Fletcher
There is at least ONE fake configuration (Boron burned in Air) which is NOT
eliminated in the 18-hour February trial.
Alan -
No way. Boron is way too toxic. The body count would have been extreme.
Further - problem is that boron combustion is not easy - and
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like they are both going Chernobyl.
Reactor 1 control room is indicating 1000x background which probably
means it's pegged. Evac has been increased to 10 km. Reactor 2 evac
is 3 km with warnings to prepare to go
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:48:24 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Multiple reports exist of varying power output from the device. Such
variability wouldn't be acceptable in a commercial device. By ganging a
hundred units together, the variability tends to average out resulting in a
Yikes.
I'm downwind from those turkeys.
... if you thought my past postings were a bit off the wall, get ready for
radiation effects ...
Geeze, the only way for anyone to benefit for this tragedy will be shorting
GE, or else getting in on the Defkalion IPO g ...
-Original Message-
At 05:08 PM 3/11/2011, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Alan J Fletcher
There is at least ONE fake configuration (Boron burned in Air) which is
NOT eliminated in the 18-hour February trial.
Alan
Reminder : This a theoretical study. It puts upper limits on
EVERYTHING.
No way. Boron is
way too
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
However, he did NOT record the volume of the reactor as a whole -- so we
have to assume that the entire horizontal arm contained fake material.
Levi looked inside the machine and saw nothing out of the ordinary. There is
no need for him to record the
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:00:17 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:New paper from Cardone
http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.1153
Neutron detectors may also be sensitive to Hydrinos through enhanced electron
capture (something which I suggested on this forum
Latest NHK news:
The outer containment vessel pressure is building up. They have to vent the
gas from it. The gas vent line goes through filters so they do not expect
particles to escape, but there may be minute quantities of radioactive
material released, so as a precaution they have evacuated
Alan-
Well, yes. Borates may be non-toxic, but how cleanly do you think a boron
fill in this kind of configuration could burn in air?
Think about it! It's completely out of the question !
BTW, the answer to the operative question is: Poorly.
Boron is toxic unless it is fully
They are outgassing Reactor 1. G-d bless those operators who are
remaining on station. They are likely DMW (dead men walking).
T
At 05:39 PM 3/11/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Alan J Fletcher
a...@well.com wrote:
However, he did NOT record the volume of the reactor as a whole -- so
we have to assume that the entire horizontal arm contained fake
material.
Levi looked inside the machine and saw nothing out of the ordinary.
At 05:54 PM 3/11/2011, Jones Beene wrote:
Alan-
Well, yes. Borates may be non-toxic, but how cleanly do you think a boron
fill in this kind of configuration could burn in air?
Think about it! Its completely out of the question !
BTW, the answer to the operative question is: Poorly.
Boron
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yikes.
I'm downwind from those turkeys.
... if you thought my past postings were a bit off the wall, get ready for
radiation effects ...
Geeze, the only way for anyone to benefit for this tragedy will be shorting
GE,
At 05:54 PM 3/11/2011, Jones Beene wrote:
Well, yes. Borates
may be non-toxic, but how cleanly do you think a boron fill in this kind
of configuration could burn in air?
Think about it! Its completely out of the question !
BTW, the answer to the operative question is: Poorly.
Contrariwise.
At 06:26 PM 3/11/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Contrariwise.
http://mineralsciences.si.edu/staff/pages/vicenzi/Dreizin%20et%20al%20CombustionFlame1999.pdf
explains EXACTLY how to make a Boron-burning fake ... INCLUDING air
.. and INCLUDING a heating resistor.
Correction ... by heating a
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
He didn't look inside the (my diagram) heat exchanger and radiation shields.
Well, he said he did. Maybe you know better.
- Jed
At 05:54 PM 3/11/2011, Jones Beene wrote:
Well, yes. Borates
may be non-toxic, but how cleanly do you think a boron fill in this kind
of configuration could burn in air?
Think about it! Its completely out of the question
!
http://www.islandone.org/Launch/boron-sharp-article.htm
Boron
At 06:46 PM 3/11/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
http://www.islandone.org/Launch/boron-sharp-article.htm
Boron combustion (including air) is a very rich research
field, particularly in rocketry.
They don't seem to think it's a problem leaving boron combustion products
in the atmosphere.
This
Very Interesting,
When Rossi says the charge is 100 grams I was surprised. I
thought the 1 Liter reactor was filled with nickel powder. Or is the
volume occupied by powder really that much larger than solid Ni? I am
looking at a 100g calibration weight that would get lost in a 1
Read up on the history of zip fuel.
Given the potential advantages, and there are definite advantages in
performance, no way is the Air Force abandoning the millions spent, when
they have carte blanche for fuel cost in any critical mission - except for
the in-house death toll (largely hidden),
This link describes the difficulties of burning boron (forms molten layer
that shields the remaining boron from oxygen) and says that by adding some
percentage of magnesium the burning issues are better.
http://www.afsbirsttr.com/Library/Documents/Innovation-050610-MACHI-OSD05-T001.pdf
Also the
Jed Rothwell has stated there is new information in the video above the Q and A.
What is this info?
Hey ,
This is Joe Novitski from .
We just added you to our buyers list, but -- before you have access to some of
the absolute BEST real estate investment opportunities in your area -- we need
you to confirm your interest in receiving these opportunities at this email
address.
To confirm,
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:57:30 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
They are outgassing Reactor 1. G-d bless those operators who are
remaining on station. They are likely DMW (dead men walking).
T
...one wonders why the control room has to be even within km's of the reactor?
75 matches
Mail list logo
