Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

I will do that and post results here Dne sreda, 18. april 2018 15.22.25 UTC+2 je oseba Greg Troxel napisala: > > Damjan Hajsek > writes: > > > So we can't do nothing to make UV index show right value, because with > > calibrating I can not get real data? > > This can probably be solved, but "ca

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

Damjan Hajsek writes: > So we can't do nothing to make UV index show right value, because with > calibrating I can not get real data? This can probably be solved, but "calibration" is very likely not the approach. Let me try to summarize what we know. Your station seems to show reasonable U

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

my altitude is 296m and here is firmware https://ambientweather.wikispaces.com/ws1002-wifi I will ask company to give me exact data about sensors, when I get it I will post it here. Dne sobota, 14. april 2018 20.50.25 UTC+2 je oseba mwall napisala: > > > > On Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 2:11:

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

On Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 2:11:29 PM UTC-4, Damjan Hajsek wrote: > > >

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

Ok I checked in manuals. Is this enough, if no

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

On Saturday, April 14, 2018 at 4:53:18 AM UTC-4, Damjan Hajsek wrote: > > No UV and radiation are not the same value. > UV, radiation, and illuminance are three different things. some stations measure illuminance, then convert to radiation. some measure radiation. measuring uv requires a diff

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

If you are using StdCalibrate to fix radiation and UV by such large factors there is clearly something not right with the driver. As Greg said a few posts back the driver should be decoding the raw UV/radiation data and returning proper values, clearly it is not. I suggest you go back to the fo

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

No UV and radiation are not the same value. UV values are in bold because I made it bold to see it better. Yes I am soure my station report the same value as it is on console I checked that many times. Here is my calibration section. [[Corrections]] # For each type, an arbitr

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

If you do not have your calibration statement are you saying that UV and radiation are the same value?? What is your calibration?? You just said it is very high. Why are some UV values in bold print in the loop and rec packets?? Are you sure that your weather station actually outputs the same

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

Yes I hope we can solve that, because I use now verry high factor for calibration to see aproximatelly the same result as on console. Dne sobota, 14. april 2018 02.35.05 UTC+2 je oseba gjr80 napisala: > > Unlikely to be anything to do with units, UV and radiation use the same > units irrespectiv

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

Hi Yes I changed units because I am from europe and units should be all in metric system and I did that because I noticed that wind on console shows 10km/h and in weewx that was abot 5 times less, like 2 km/h. So I still didn resolve that too. And problem with UV still persist, I solved it for n

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

Unlikely to be anything to do with units, UV and radiation use the same units irrespective of the unit system in use. From the loop/archive data last shown I would hazard a guess that the driver is (now) doing its thing correctly and presenting weeWX with credible UV and radiation values. If th

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

Damjan I do not think you are telling us everything which you are doing/changing!! When you first posted to this thread the loop records were in US units, and UV values appeared to be very high. Your latest posting has loop records in metric, and UV values appear to be more like UV index val

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

Andrew Milner writes: > matthew has already said tha weewx does not calculate uv index - it merely > uses the data provided by the station But if there is some hardware that provides bits in a UV field, then a driver for that hardware should be translating the bits into an index value according

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

I have this weather station https://www.ambientweather.com/amws1000wifi.html I will try to make more loop packages and see what station send. Dne sreda, 11. april 2018 18.42.13 UTC+2 je oseba Greg Troxel napisala: > > > I did misunderstand, sort of. I think you are in a situation where > either

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

matthew has already said tha weewx does not calculate uv index - it merely uses the data provided by the station On Wednesday, 11 April 2018 19:42:13 UTC+3, Greg Troxel wrote: > > I did misunderstand, sort of. I think you are in a situation where > either > > your station is behaving stran

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

I did misunderstand, sort of. I think you are in a situation where either your station is behaving strangely the interceptor driver fo fine offset station does not have support for decoding UV index, and is just reporting byte values until that's figured out something else :-) So I

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

correction - from the loop data you provided it appears your weather station is not outputting a UV Index in the UV field, but is instead outputting some numerical value which you need to try and convert into an index - which may or may not be possible. Without knowing more examples of console UV

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

Maybe we didn't understand right. Station show real value of UV index on my terminal at home. But not on my web page by weewx. So it is settings in weewx Dne sreda, 11. april 2018 15.08.09 UTC+2 je oseba Greg Troxel napisala: > > Damjan Hajsek > writes: > > > Anyone know what to use in > > [StdC

Re: [weewx-user] Re: UV index

Damjan Hajsek writes: > Anyone know what to use in > [StdCalibrate] > > [[Corrections]] > > to correct UV index? Because now at night it is UV = 15 (I don't have any actual experience here, either with weewx calibration or with UV sensors that ever show 15.) Typically, "calibration" in