There are currently no integration efforts ongoing. I haven't actually
played with it - waiting for the mac version - except for reading the
docs and a short look at some code, so I don't really know whether it
is possible to generate just reusable components, or that GWT only
renders whole
What are the other parts of you thinking about? ;)
Eelco
On 6/17/06, Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Part of me starts thinking about open sourcing my simple time tracker
application, which would be a good demonstration of wicket+spring+hibernate.
On 6/17/06, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL
For anyone except you?
On 6/17/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
he didnt say because what those parts are thinking is private
-Igor
On 6/17/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the other parts of you thinking about? ;)
Eelco
On 6/17/06, Mark Derricutt
(if not before) then.
I'm currently adding various functions that make it a bit more usefull (like
accunt creation!) then will make it available somewhere I guess.
On 6/18/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the other parts of you thinking about
add(new Label(foo, h1Hello/h1).setEscapeModelStrings(false));
So, it's the escapeModelStrings flag you're after.
Eelco
On 6/18/06, Karl M. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I have a control which loads HTML content from a database and then displays
it in a page. However, I
There have been fixes for IE related bugs. I think it is fixed in 1.2's trunk.
Eelco
On 6/18/06, Javed Sujela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting an error when running the AutoCompletePage example
(wicket1.2 final) on my WinXP machine . Works fine with Firefox
Here is a screen shot of the
Hey, competition :)
Kuddos, I think it's only good for Wicket and it's users to have a
competing book. When do you think you'll be ready with it?
Cheers,
Eelco
On 6/19/06, karthik Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm writing a book on Wicket for Apress. Finally - finally I'm allowed
No idea. Most of us (people that I know around here) run their Wicket
apps straight from the IDE. And there's nothing magical going on in
wicket-auth-roles-examples either...
Eelco
On 6/19/06, Stefan Arentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a really odd problem here. I'm working on a simple
As far as I understand it, all root mapping problems are solved when
we use the servlet filter we have in 2.0 instead of the wicket servlet
of pre-2.0. It's probably easy to back port, but the only problem is
that it breaks the API in some places (like
WebApplication.getWicketServlet will be
I'll look into it tomorrow (going to bed now).
Cheers,
Eelco
On 6/20/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to the mailing-list, and very interested in Wicket. I
designed recently an application that generates user interface
based on a RDF schema. To
You can override Resource.configureResponse or WebResource.setHeaders.
Additionally, you could consider using Resource.setCacheable(false),
and then the IResourceStream's (or actually IModifiable's)
lastModifiedTime result is used.
Eelco
On 6/19/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
how
It's not out yet, and it will take some more months to write. It will
be published by Manning as part of the ... In Action series (Wicket In
Action).
Eelco
On 6/20/06, Michael Welter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Eelco's book in English, and where can I find it?
Thanks,
karthik Guru wrote:
I haven't seen Karthik's content, so I can't speak for him. As for the
book Martijn and me are writing: we have a bunch of Manning editors
and proofreaders making sure we don't make a mess of the book. Wicket
In Action will not only explain you how to do things, but also why and
tries to give you
] wrote:
My resource is static file, so naturaly I want to use PackageResource. But I
cannot override the configureResponse() or setHeaders() because
PackageResource has private contructor. I cannot resue this class.
Thanks Jan
Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL
Looks to me like you have some classpath problems. Try cleaning up
your projects and make sure you don't have duplicate entries etc.
Eelco
On 6/20/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i get this stack trace the first time i try to access a page. the page is a
simple form (no ajax/upload)
into it when he is back. I increased
the priority a bit so that it won't slip our attention.
Eelco
On 6/20/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll look into it tomorrow (going to bed now).
Cheers,
Eelco
On 6/20/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm new
Just put the form components on your panel, and nest that panel in any
form you want. Their models will be updated, no matter how deep the
components are nested.
Eelco
On 6/20/06, Hugo Visser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As my first wicket exercise I thought I'd create a little utility like
Yep. Or alternatively, use attribute modifiers:
WebMarkupContainer c = new WebMarkupContainer(myimage);
c.add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(src,
http://images.apple.com/macbook/images/macbookglossydisplay20060516.jpg;));
add(c);
or
public class ExternalImage extends WebMarkupContainer {
public
obvious actually
:)
Thanks again,
Hugo
On 6/21/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just put the form components on your panel, and nest that panel in any
form you want. Their models will be updated, no matter how deep the
components are nested.
Eelco
On 6/20/06, Hugo
I'm afraid I have no experience with that. Maybe someone else on the list?
Eelco
On 6/19/06, Ross Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just written my first wicket app and I'm having a small problem.
The web app is a simple survey form where the user will navigate a
series of video clips and
And if you always/ throughout your whole web application have to
format in a certain style, you can register a converter that does
that.
Eelco
On 6/21/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, you pretty much nailed it. although i would extend webmarkupcomponent
instead of label since
I don't think that code will be better readable. But I'm looking
forward to what you think it should look like :)
Eelco
On 6/21/06, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of using some super long regex why not code the logic by hand
(the old fashion way without regex). I find that
Yeah, that would be a good idea. Any volunteers for testing and
copying? Lots of people with access to wicket-stuff :)
Eelco
On 6/22/06, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps all 1.2 compliant stuff could be copied into the wicket-stuff/
WICKET_1_2 branch so we know what should
Nope, that's the way. We hope to make it a bit nicer someday, though
it's just a one time copy thing anyway.
Eelco
On 6/22/06, Michiel Trimpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone already built an
AuthenticatedSpringWebApplication?
Seems like I need to implement Authentication by
It's probably less than a day work to convert to 1.3 by hand. But
you'd be on your own I'm afraid. We considered 1.3. vs 1.4. long time
ago, and thought 1.4. had enough improvements to justify going for
that.
Eelco
On 6/22/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wicket is compiled using
Fixed now.
Eelco
On 6/22/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it is a bug.
Juergen
On 6/22/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ITestPageSource is not serializable. If it was, you wouldn't have this
problem. I don't use that part of Wicket myself, nor wrote
upgraded ;)
On 6/22/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's probably less than a day work to convert to 1.3 by hand. But
you'd be on your own I'm afraid. We considered 1.3. vs 1.4. long time
ago, and thought 1.4. had enough improvements to justify going for
that.
Eelco
On 6
(fieldDefinitionModel));
add(new CheckBox(required));
add(new TextField(maxLength));
}
public void onSubmit() {
...
}
}
On 6/23/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like
Agreed with Philip. However, one important note is that of the changing API. Though the constructor change and generics support were huge changes, the rest of the internals of the frameworks pretty much stayed the same. We have a couple of things we really feel should be improved, converters
Thanks Janne!
Eelco
On 6/24/06, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
I checked in the Wicket portlet (JSR-168) support into Wicket 1.2 branch.
Comments and patches are welcome.
Different portlet modes (EDIT,VIEW,HELP) are not yet supported, but coming
soon. Also a
Add your javascript function either just in the body, or as a header
contribution (see e.g. wicket.extensions.util.resource for some useful
utilities), and then call/ initialize that on body onload:
myWebComponent.getWebPage().getBodyContainer().addOnLoadModifier(callToFoo();,
myWebComponent);
If you can't profile directly, you might want to put in a inspector
page such as the wicket examples have that (see the 'i' icon in the
top left corner of wicket-examples apps), and see if there are any
extreme things going on.
Eelco
On 6/27/06, A. Zwaan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
people think is logical?
johan
On 6/20/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see there is some disagreement on
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1485695group_id=119783atid=684977
but that Johan basically wants to adopt the change in a slightly
different
Hi Frank,
What you stumble upon is largely a matter of individual taste of the
core developers. There is no overall design strategy for things like
this, and you'll find that depending on who wrote classes, the way
extension points are setup can be very different. For instance the
ListView was
So where is that job description of yours? :)
Eelco
On 6/27/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you stay out of Europe, the market is almost divided. Only South
America, the pacific and Africa.
And if you eva stick your dirty hands across the pond, we'll have you
for
That's just mean man; you got your diploma and your girlfriend broke up? ;)
Eelco
finished off my school (Hanze University Groningen)
yesterday and I am am a bachelor now. Will send my cv later this week.
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done
I think you're right and external link should do this too. Anyone else
an opinion about this?
Eelco
On 6/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Link uses a href attribute and an onclick handler:
// generate the href attribute
tag.put(href, Strings.replaceAll(url, ,
/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're right and external link should do this too. Anyone else
an opinion about this?
Eelco
On 6/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Link uses a href attribute and an onclick handler:
// generate
I think it might help a lot of users to write a WIKI page on this.
Ittay and John, it would be welcome to share your experiences :)
Eelco
On 6/28/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have done the reverse: embedding wicket in a jsp page. if that interests
you, i'll be glad to help
We reprimanded Igor for fixing the bug without first writing a
proposal, organize two meetings about it (with coffee and snacks),
making a branch to for his fix, letting our official test comittee
loose on it, interpret their results, organize another meeting,
changing the proposal from v.0.3.6 to
org.mortbay.jetty.jar
#others
commons-logging-1.0.4.jar
log4j-1.2.13.jar
On 11/22/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case you have a small test project or something, I would be very
interested in taking a look at that and see if there's anything we
need to do to make Wicket behave better
to update
partial content
of result page. err... Both are weird...
On 6/29/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is the Include component, which does stuff like that in a very
basic way. There is an open issue for improving the Include component.
It's been there for quite
in YourWebApplication.init
Read more about it in IRequestCycleSettings's javadocs. Wouldn't that
suit your purposes better?
Eelco
On 6/28/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, created http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Jsp_Integration
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I think it might help a lot
:
but doing that will affect all of the app, so if you have pages outside of
jsp they will be affected also
-Igor
On 6/28/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks a lot for the contributions. I haven't looked to deep into the
details, but I noticed your way of turning off
Yeah, ok. I agree with Igor now too. Just wanted to make sure you
didn't miss the render strategy.
Eelco
On 6/28/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Thanks a lot for the contributions. I haven't looked to deep into the
details, but I noticed your way
I had problems with sourceforge too today. Thanks Ingram,
Eelco
On 6/28/06, Ingram Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will post it after sourceforge allow login.
On 6/29/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. Would you mind attaching that to an issue on sourceforge please
From the javadocs:
* The model property is used to set the 'value' attribute. It will
* thus be the label of the button that shows up for end users. If you want the
* attribute to keep it's markup attribute value, don't provide a model, or let
* it return an empty string.
If you provide a
I just checked in the fix for the problem I found with Jetty 6 (and
which might be an issue in other containers). From the change log:
'Implemented a workaround for an inconsistency between different
servlet containers and a bug in the servlet spec which does not seem
to state what should happen
That all works only for validation - it doesn't prevent components'
models from being updated, and it is quite a lot of work. An easier
and better way is to override isEnabled (or isVisible, but isEnabled
seems better here) and return false if they shouldn't be validated and
updated. The only
Btw, it turns out it *was* a bug in Jetty 6. It recently got fixed
(svn only now). Anyway, Wicket should now work regardless of that bug
or not.
Eelco
On 7/3/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked in the fix for the problem I found with Jetty 6 (and
which might
Yeah, the raw input is always updated, so getInput will give the
updated value, and it is also used to set the output value of form
components.
Eelco
On 7/5/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't setDefaultFormProcessing(false) work for you? The values should
be preserved even if
That, or just use a SubmitLink coupled to a a tag with an img tag
embedded. Or use CSS.
Eelco
On 7/6/06, Frank Bille Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean? Like the entire button is just your image or that you
both have text and an icon?
Try taking a look at:
It must be in the wrong place somehow, if glassfish doesn't pick it
up. You should try to figure out how Glassfish works with commons
logging. Typically there is logging configuration for the whole
application server, and then for specific web applications. Not all
containers behave the same
In fact log4j.logger.wicket=INFO should be enough.
Eelco
On 7/6/06, Vincent Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
log4j.debug=false
log4j.rootLogger=INFO
log4j.logger.org=INFO
log4j.logger.com=INFO
log4j.logger.net=INFO
log4j.logger.nl=INFO
log4j.logger.wicket=INFO
to change.
ugh :(
On 7/6/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wicket uses commons-logging. I wonder whether glassfish doesn't have
it's own weird logger factory, just like jetty does.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
In fact log4j.logger.wicket=INFO should be enough
Why would you want to make logging easy? :) If SUN had just adopted
Log4J instead of IBM's kit like the whole world besides IBM asked them
to do, we wouldn't have been in this mess.
Eelco
On 7/6/06, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/07/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so
You should use AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior for this. Then you
can just get your model object. Your model object has to be something
that is update-able though. Currently you use a string, which is read
only. Do e.g. something like this:
public class SampleTextArea extends TextArea {
If you did listView.setReuseItems(true), which is a good choice when
you embed a ListView in a form, you should manually 'update' the list
view by calling listView.removeAll, which will trigger the list view
to get all the fresh results again and build the list items from
scratch.
If you use
Thanks for your reply. That would solve my problem partially but create
another problem that is it would go to the server for every letter, and I
want to send it on a click without submitting the form (forgot to mention it
in the previous mail).
It doesn't go back for every change, but only
A similar discussion came up shortly about the Tree component. What I
said there was that it was a nice extra that the tree model can be
used in both Swing and Wicket. If there are other concrete cases we
can do that, it's something to consider. Remains a fact that desktop
widgets and web widgets
Yeah, that sounds like something we should like.
Eelco
On 7/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, Wicket probably wants to prevent that a bogus value '07.07.2006trail' is
parsed.
But shouldn't is be possible to convert '07.07.2006 '? How about adding a
trim()?
Sven
Thanks for your reply. That would solve my problem partially but create
another problem that is it would go to the server for every letter, and I
want to send it on a click without submitting the form (forgot to mention it
in the previous mail).
It doesn't go back for every change, but only
remembered something about OGNL no longer being
needed -- but it seemed far easier to just throw it in the lib
directory.
Why not manually add the jars to the zip? It seems like a nicer
introduction to Wicket that way.
None the less, thanks for everything.
On 7/7/06, Eelco Hillenius
Feedback panel typically should display any messages. You added a
feedback panel to your page, and you are rendering the same page?
Personally, I wouldn't catch exceptions in my models though. If a
service fails and it is not designed to fail quietly, I would rather
display some error page. But
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket-user-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco Hillenius
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:54 PM
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] LoadableDetachableModel question
Feedback panel typically should display any messages. You added
Yep. Look at AbortException and subclasses. You might be looking for
AbortWithHttpStatusException.
Eelco
On 7/10/06, Adam Smyczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
This is probably a simple question, but is it possible to abort a
request in e.g. onBeginRequest() method of WebRequestCycle
Hello,
It is not necessary in from 1.2 on to pre-register shared resources.
The big reason to loose that requirement - besides convenience - is
the constant classloader headache pre-registering gave us.
Unfortunately, there is no rock-solid mechanism to get all the
contents of a package in Java,
It inherited that problem from Swing's Tree component. Don't ask me
why, but even though there is this TreeNode interface, Swing's Tree is
not really usuable with anything else than DefaultMutableTreeNode.
Unless I missed something.
Eelco
On 7/13/06, Арву Оетук [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I
Yeah, that should be doable. Only thing is that the tree has to use
bookmarkable links for the selection and fold/unfold items, and - if
you really want your tree to be independent from any prior session
state - you have to implement that tree such that it can construct
itself in the proper state
Did you try using the markup inheritance facility of Wicket?
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Markup_inheritance
Eelco
On 7/11/06, Jin Zhu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a child class B inheriting from a modal window with certain
functionality A. With the exception of a
We'd need a bit more detail on your setup/ configuration etc. Does the
problem occor with all web browsers, or just a particular?
Wicket supports using the back button out-of-the-box, and page expiry
certainly points to something going wrong in your web app.
Eelco
On 7/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have to use a reader for that instead of an inputstream. See Java
IO's documentation for more on that.
Eelco
On 7/11/06, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Im a little curious about this. I have an file stream which is
delivered(actually a html file) to me, I then write the file
IModel#getObject is called anytime a component accesses it. Basically,
you should never depend on that method getting called a fixed number
of times; it is not designed for that. Typically if you need to do
heavy operations such as loading data from a database, you should use
detachable models. A
Nino
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eelco Hillenius
Sent: 14. juli 2006 09:19
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] wicket.markup.html.include.Include / encodingerror
You have to use a reader
Sorry I couldn't resist, but... JSF's navigation model elegant? I
really don't see that. Imo it is in fact one of the best proofs that
JSF is ill designed.
First of all, there is abstraction. If you want a JSF like navigation
model, please go ahead and implement that. A couple of classes are
It's annonymous classes biting you. Your instance of
RenderedDynamicImageResource has an implicit reference to Image, which
isn't serializable (and which isn't something you want to keep as
component state anyway). To fix, try to move the image creation to the
render method, so that no references
Could you please attach that to a bug report? Thanks,
Eelco
On 7/13/06, Martin Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to update a TextField in a Form that is connected to a
DatePicker. But somehow this does not work.
My first impression is that DatePicker winns over the
I think you need to use AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior so that your
model will automatically updated.
Eelco
On 7/14/06, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, np just switched back to checkbox and wrote this:
cb_HeleLandet.add(new AjaxEventBehavior(onclick) {
protected void
Where do you store which user is currently selected? In the
wicket-examples project, there are several examples of how you could
do this, e.g. the library example. And maybe wicket-auth-roles might
give you some ideas too.
Do you maybe use a static reference to your user? A singleton that
stores
Hi,
I can only give you a couple of sites that I know for sure wouldn't
mind to be referenced.
Teachscape (in progress): www.teachscape.com (65,000+ users, multiple
man years development)
Servoy: www.servoy.com
Finan: www.finan.nl (financial analyses product, market leader in Holland)
Several
Could you please be more specific to what kind kind of additional
support you would like to see? Could you give a few end-user (from the
perspective of framework users of course) examples of what you'd like?
Eelco
On 7/15/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think wicket needs to
Yeah, like I said, you probably actually work on the same data with
different sessions. Likely, you use a static reference or a singleton
somewhere for the currently logged on user.
Eelco
On 7/15/06, Steve Moitozo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get the same behavior using two different computers
I never actually used 2, so I wouldn't know of problems, but 1 is more
space efficient, while 2 is not that much resource (processor,
database) efficient, so 1 would have my preference anyway.
I think 3 makes sense if you have a good business reason for that. But
I haven't seen a lot of actual
You wouldn't do that component by component, but rather for your whole
page. One way of setting the encoding of a page is to make this the
first line of your page markup:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
Some discussion is here
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Markup_encoding too,
If you rip the trick they are using, it is trivial to implement such a
thing e.g. as a panel or border. No need for extra server side state
either, except for if you want to persist the layout for any next
session to pick up.
Eelco
On 7/15/06, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
On 7/16/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with #1 is, first its a bit ugly,
Working with objects directly is always the nicest of course. In many
cases, where you just have to display some read-only information, you
don't really need to pass the model all the time
But that really depends on how you structure your models. If you use
models that do the loading once on attach, cache the results, and then
unload on detach, you wouldn't have the double loading if you share
the model. Instead of passing ids around, you pass around the model of
course. Besides
But you can pass the models too. It's not only a choice of either
passing in the object or their ids. And even if you would go through
the persistence layer, within the same transaction I think Hibernate
caches your objects too, so that would just be a very slight overhead.
Eelco
On 7/16/06,
in DefaultMutableTreeNode.
Eelco
On 7/14/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It inherited that problem from Swing's Tree component. Don't ask me
why, but even though there is this TreeNode interface, Swing's Tree is
not really usuable with anything else than DefaultMutableTreeNode.
Unless I missed
Not at this time. Shouldn't be too hard to do, but we're still waiting
for someone to contribute it :)
Eelco
On 7/17/06, Арву Оетук [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Is component like Modal Dialog exist in wicket framework?
Dmitry.
to bug yu guys with RFC ...thanks eelco
On 7/15/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please be more specific to what kind kind of additional
support you would like to see? Could you give a few end-user (from the
perspective of framework users of course) examples of what you'd
That package is just a few months old :) If you come up with some
useful contributions specific for CSS, I'd be happy to incorporate
them.
Eelco
On 7/17/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
really?...shit!!..thanks
On 7/17/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you
When is setObject supposed to get called, Cause I only see it get called
during
construct?
Whenever a (form)component has to update it's model contents. Or if
you call setObject explicitly of course :() Typically, a component
update is done by Form, which visits all it's children and calls
I'm not clear on what your question is. Keep in mind that you have to
call setOutputMarkupId(true) on any component you want to target
(render) with ajax requests.
Eelco
On 7/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I am calling WebMarkupContainer on Ajax call .
but
Yeah do it like that. I wouldn't know why attaching attribute
modifiers to your form didn't work though...
Eelco
On 7/17/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you should add Button(s) to the form and add onclick attribute
modifier on them (or right on to the markup input
Maybe you could send some code of what you are trying to do...
Eelco
On 7/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I have WebMarkupContainer code in this WebMarkupContainer there is list View
I am tragting this WebMarkupContainer on Dropdown ajax call but there is
previous
I think Matej and Igor have been working on that. Maybe they can
comment on this.
Eelco
On 7/17/06, Nili Adoram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have an AjaxLink that opens a modal dialog (which is implemented as an
iframe that displays the URL of that link).
The link is embedded inside a
It works, sorry, I was not paying enough attention. In the first phase I
wasn't looking to the right form, the the second phase I forgot to add
the 'return' in the 'onsubmit' form handler
Correct is *add(new SimpleAttributeModifier(onsubmit, return
confirmSubmission()));* and it works with
I'm afraid I don't get the request. Could you please create a feature
request with a patch, clearly explaining what is wrong today and what
your patch fixes?
Thanks,
Eelco
On 7/17/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We're using plugins similar to Eclipse's to decouple functionality.
I don't think models have to be implementation details. Sometimes that
makes sense, and in that case I usually like to embed the model class
in the component itself. But lots of other times, you can make the
model so that it can easily be reused by other components, possibly at
the same time. This
1401 - 1500 of 3028 matches
Mail list logo
