On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Romaine Wiki wrote:
> Today I was reading in the (international) news about websites with
> knowledge on the topic of climate change disappear from the internet as
> result of the Trump administration.
...
> Luckily there are many
As I know there should be a disaster recovery plan within US, but the
question is to know if the risk assessment includes also the political
issues and the option to move the data centers outside US in case of
political risks.
It's not my competence, but in several points there is a
Hoi,
Yes. You are right. But having a strategy starts with basics. Having full
backups and moving them of the premises. The next part, having a working
environment is a next step.
Did you consider what it means when a government takes hold of the domain?
How we are to change the registration so
Hi Pine,
Thanks for raising this task. There is more to a disaster plan than just
smuggling backups of the content itself out though. The projects have
grown to a size now where they cannot be run by some guy out of his garage
using a backup; we need to think about how we can move or protect
Thank you, Pine.
Yes, this is essential. We've avoided the issue in the past, but it's time
to have a proper international backup now.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Pine W wrote:
> I have created a Phabricator task here:
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T156544
>
>
As long as humanity maintains the concept of non-citizen, global suffering will
prevail.
I believe the only way to address backup and privacy concerns is to permanently
dissolve all current systems relying on the infrastructure that corporations
and governments can touch or see and move to
On every continent there are likely risks and we should be aware of them.
Copyrights issues are also something to look out for.
In the Netherlands the telecom enforcement agency is pretty strict and
active in enforcing net neutrality.
But yes, risks are spread over the world.
Where the servers
Actually some parties might bring EU to low standards of freedom of
expression.
For what concerns Wikimedia, I fear more lobbying about copyright related
legislation or about net neutrality than USA turning into a dictatorship.
I'm not afraid of a complete service disruption but instead of things
Hi Nathan,
You describe what I tried to say: threats to the environment in what
Wikimedia operates.
In the Netherlands there has been a government based on populism (with
Geert Wilders) but the effects were very limited. The same in other EU
countries. Political parties and political leaders in
Hi!
Sorry, I had not the intention to write a Wikipedia article that is
balanced.
The only thing I tried to describe is some signals in the media that give
me concerns.
But I am sorry to say, but your reaction is something what I would call
naieve, and biased as well. You are free to think that
In this case I think its more than the projects that need to be protected,
there are a lot of resources based in the US that may need to be
distributed on a wider base including personal/private data already
collected by the WMF. There are already practical challenges ahead with US
visa changes
It's not so challenging, Nathan -we just need to make a copy of a full
backup for each language version, we have and store it in the
country/countries where the language is spoken. This avoids any bias in the
selection.
Regards,
Sir48-Thyge
2017-01-28 2:12 GMT+01:00 Nathan :
I have created a Phabricator task here:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T156544
Pine
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
>
> Nathan said "*its only reasonable to consider a move of core **assets
> somewhere safer from the unspooling of Western social fabric*
> ..
> *This is more challenging than I expected. Where will *
> *we find some place that is protected from the pernicious threats that
> beset **the
Romaine makes some good points. There is a legitimate concern that the turn
to populism and unpredictability threatens the environment in which
Wikimedia operates, and its only reasonable to consider a move of core
assets somewhere safer from the unspooling of Western social fabric.
Perhaps the
I for one would really, really, really like to see full backup of all data
to servers outside USA, if necessary with anonymized contributors. A first
step would be to store digests for the revisions on alternate servers, and
make it possible to double check the validity of the content. That is, a
The question is: Is it a legitimate issue or a sensationalized mole hill?
Given what I researched I am seeing more of a mole hill. Give it a few
days, odds are there will be clarification and this issue will blow over.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Nathan wrote:
> On Fri,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:39 PM, John wrote:
> Im not sure you are reading section 14 correctly. It makes reference to
> Privacy Act (Privacy Act of 1974) and the privacy policy of the federal
> agencies involved in immigration enforcement and law enforcement agencies.
Im not sure you are reading section 14 correctly. It makes reference to
Privacy Act (Privacy Act of 1974) and the privacy policy of the federal
agencies involved in immigration enforcement and law enforcement agencies.
IE the government can freely share information between agencies with
regards to
>... there is zero chance that the president will be able to censor
> the private sector.
If you mean the U.S. private sector, you're right. But otherwise, the
U.S. President is allowed to take a whole lot of actions which can
effectively censor non-citizens, and I've got some bad news pertaining
I must say the tone of the initial post to this is alarmingly biased and
almost misleading. Yes the incoming president has placed a hold on
releasing additional material. By no means does that imply that they will
start censoring data that they release or in any way affect the private
sector.
On 27 January 2017 at 03:33, Romaine Wiki wrote:
> But I think it is possible to make sure risks are spread over the world.
> Certainly as we are an international movement that intends to cover the
> knowledge of the whole humanoid civilisation.
> To come to a conclusion,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 at 13:10 Amir Ladsgroup wrote:
> Yes they are: https://dumps.wikimedia.org/mirrors.html and three out of
> four of them are outside U.S.
>
Well technically that isn't all of the data / a backup ;)
>
> Best
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:26 PM Gerard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_download#Where_do_I_get_it.3F
Seddon
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> Hoi,
> No they are not backed up outside the USA. I am not so sure there are off
> line backups/
> Thanks,
>
I would not consider the dumps to be backups. They are for purposes of
mirroring, research, analysis, offline reading and bot processing among
other things, but as a backup of our data they fall short. Not only are
they not up to the minute but they do not contain private data, as they are
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Amir Ladsgroup wrote:
> Yes they are: https://dumps.wikimedia.org/mirrors.html and three out of
> four of them are outside U.S.
No images/files backup outside of US.
--
Milos
___
Wikimedia-l
Yes they are: https://dumps.wikimedia.org/mirrors.html and three out of
four of them are outside U.S.
Best
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:26 PM Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> No they are not backed up outside the USA. I am not so sure there are off
> line backups/
>
Hoi,
No they are not backed up outside the USA. I am not so sure there are off
line backups/
Thanks,
GerardM
On 27 January 2017 at 10:10, Peter Southwood
wrote:
> I hope the servers are backed up outside the USA in at least two places
> and that the data is
I hope the servers are backed up outside the USA in at least two places and
that the data is also backed up off-line somewhere to make it unhackable.
Cheers,
Peyer
-Original Message-
From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of
Romaine Wiki
Sent:
29 matches
Mail list logo