I've been hearing more and more about spam filters that are too
agressive. Calling may be the best thing to do.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Scottie Arnett sarn...@info-ed.comwrote:
In my area, I have to deal with northstarstudios.tv.
I have sent emails after emails to them.I guess next
opportunity for me.
Thanks,
Rich
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
/employee would be needed. I hope available
equipment is quite stable and reliable?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
Hi Rich,
WISPA General List is actually a Global List.
It would go a long ways for relevant folks to reply back to you if you at
least
What does a pure fixed wireless mean?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com wrote:
Rich,
Take a look at the failing business model of Clear. They have their own
licensed spectrum and in my area they spent
close to 140 million dollars on build out. They had
How do the companies that have a dongle do it? Are they using something
other than a WISP?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Sam Tetherow tethe...@shwisp.net wrote:
Rich,
Given current gear, FCC regulations and available spectrum, outside of
reselling cellular you are not going to going
: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 28, 2011 7:40 PM, Rich _ rich.ema...@gmail.com wrote:
How do the companies that have a dongle do it? Are they using something
other than a WISP?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Sam Tetherow tethe...@shwisp.netwrote:
Rich
). The equipment cost is expensive
as well with base stations in the tens of thousands of dollars and I'm
sure the dongles are probably in the $100-200/unit range as well.
Rich _ wrote:
How do the companies that have a dongle do it? Are they using
something other than a WISP?
On Mon, Nov 28
Then, most WISP operations use unlicensed freqencies?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Matt Jenkins m...@smarterbroadband.netwrote:
**
Proprietary equipment in most cases. They also use licensed frequency
which they pay a premium for.
On 11/28/2011 04:51 PM, Rich _ wrote:
What type
in most cases. They also use licensed frequency
which they pay a premium for.
On 11/28/2011 04:51 PM, Rich _ wrote:
What type of equipment does Clear/OpenRange use that allows a connection
using one of those 1x3 USB things?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Josh Luthman j
Loved the image. What really amazes me is that you can mail to anywhere in the
galaxy for a mere 41 cent first class postage.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [OT] The USPS never
network like the Internet that's actually INTENDED for public use. If the
Michigan felony law is not specific to government networks I think it should
be changed. I think it's wrong for a 5yr felony crime being applied to
public wifi.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Smith, Rick
http://www.netburnerstore.com/embedded_ethernet_development_p/nndk-mod5270lc-kit.htm
$99 includes core module, development board, ac adapter, ethernet cable,
crossover cable, serial cable, and software (including a collection of
canned applications). Lowest priced hardware I've seen.
-
We ran Skype from our windows phones. Why? Just to see if it'd work as an
internet app! :-) Worked fine.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Try it out vs
,
mounted in the trunk, and it would be something that would sell like crazy
for $3k installed.
I guess what I would like is a retail version of this with more features:
http://www.popsci.com/popsci/how20/d04305f2dbbf1110vgnvcm104eecbccdrcrd.html
pd
Rich Comroe wrote:
What a rip! Sprint
. I love ppc6700 windows phones ... a lot lighter and smaller than
a laptop yet nearly as capable.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Try it out vs. Cingular
was in the 1990s) was solution neutral ... how it was to be
provided was not mandated. Except for interoperability for voice
communications ... back in the 90s the recommendations were quite specific
for how this would best be provided.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL
Source Projects Survive Poisonous
People (And You Can Too). Doesn't have to be an Open Source Project for it
to be applicable. You don't have to view it all ... but everyone should at
minimum view the section on list-server behavior. I give it 2 thumbs up.
Rich
- Original Message
that you know nothing about? Yet
you wonder where people get the notion from that you're anti-gov. Why not
just say excuse me on that one and we'll move on.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Justin Comroe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday
the impact of paid
lobbyists. Of course, the major industries have a voice that's orders of
magnitude louder. But that's the way it's always been.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
you
really find no redeeming qualities in anything expressed thru your
government?
Respectfully,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Mark Koskenmaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Open Meeting
industry forum or government committee they saw fit. It's really
tough when it's your own time, expense, motivation.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
and I enjoy discussion with people like yourself who are
skilled in the industry and can express themselves well (you certainly do).
I guess I just enjoy your discussion!:-) I'd happily discuss anything
on the topic off-list as I feel as strongly about it as you seem to.
best regards,
Rich
, and abandon meddling where I think
they shouldn't have ever interfered.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Rick Harnish
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 10:38 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Admits Mistakes In Measuring Broadband Competition
Mark,
This was one
for VoIP customers.
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/041007-verizon-patents-vonage.html?t51hbcompany=
Rich
--
WISPA Wireless List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Saw this in Network World and thought of the recent WalMart RFID thread on
this list. Enjoy.
Rich
-
Wal-Mart and the Three Great RFID Lies
by Yankee Ingenuity, Howard Anderson
The Three Great Lies used to be: My wife doesn't understand
) religiously protect their IPR, and
if you want to compete (meaning: grow large) you better pay attention.
Vonage's crime was complete total ignorance of the law of IPR (which we all
know is always a very poor legal defense for breaking the law).
Rich
p.s. On re-reading before hitting SEND I note
uninstalling the interfering
program returns windows operation to normal. Had this happen to me, and it was
as simple as uninstalling a paint program (Micrografix picture publisher 10)
... but figuring out that this application had a conflict was the hard part.
Rich
- Original Message
are not made to be displayed on a
42 HD monitor, he's correct ... but Slingbox, LocationFree, and BeyondTV
compressed recordings look just fine to me (about the same as analog cable
looked).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Tuesday
What patents did Vonage infringe upon. What does Verizon have a patter on
concerning voip ...
Many thanks to Peter, who supplied all the specifics of the patents in
question. Interesting reading.
... and how does that effect the future?
I read the public announcement from Vonage issued the
? How could it possibly
compete against products out there already that use only a tenth of this BW?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IPTV
Nice easy reading here.
http
numbers at issue.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Vonage
What patents did Vonage infringe upon.
What does Verizon have a patter on concerning voip and how does that
effect
a separate
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as your post reads?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Peter R.
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vonage
I tracked down the patents and the verdict. I had to dig through PACER
and pay about
. With the lack of products,
UTAM has amassed a huge debt.
The FCC groundrules for clearing the Pt-Pt users from the band were more than
enough to insure that this UL band would never be effectively utilized in the
United States.
Just my opinion,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Ralph
, very large US manufacturer, and all UL
business phone development in 1.9GHz have long ago (years ago) been permenantly
cancelled to my best knowledge.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
they pay the fees? I am trying to understand all the issues
being discussed here and feel I am missing important facts.
Thank you,
Scriv
Rich Comroe wrote:
Did you look at the UTAM URL? The fee until recently was $20 per
device A market killer if I've ever seen one, especially
where you are
crossing. Am I seeing things?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Bob Moldashel
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tower climbing
Looks like someone was not paying attention when they installed it. You
just
issue, which could be significant to a wisp if he's become reliant upon
network performance monitoring (which is a good thing IMO).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 11:01 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP
about 30 yrs
in the industry (I spent almost 10 yrs of it in standards group participation).
I don't know how others on the list think of the topic. If we're boring
others maybe we should continue any follow-up off-line.
cheers,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: wispa
to point out the jump in technology that they are bridging in the
last post, and to me it's completely revolutionary.
regards,
Rich
p.s. I have to admit that I used to think in complete agreement with your line
of argument when I was much younger. I don't know whether you're younger than
me
the auctions could net monetarily ... if they simply allowed the winner to
deploy whatever technology they felt like. The airways belong to the American
people. It's my government, and I wished they acted in my best interests ...
and not as a revenue generator for the federal budget.
Rich
procedures common across all these devices.
Anyways, I appreciate your thoughts and enjoy comparing differing opinions.
peace,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: wispa
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Some unlicensed history
called
DSRR either (digital short range radio) which was allocated but intentionally
torpedoed by manufacturers lobbying for standards that they knowingly never
intended to build to.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: wispa
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 8
(within the
typically lower upstream cap).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: David E. Smith
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone Seen AppleTV yet ?
Rick Smith wrote:
Wonder what kinda bandwidth this will eat up
Amen, and well said. There is a lot that an industry org can do in this
respect. I'm familiar with APCO and find many similarities. (key: APCO =
Association of Publicsafety Communications Officials ... www.apcointl.org)
Here's some examples.
1.. Speak for the industry to the FCC.
DOT is ***supposed*** to switch to DSRC for this. DSRC was allocated 75MHz at
5.9Ghz just above the U-NII band based on roadway highway needs such as this
DOT application. I participated in DSRC formulation enough to know that DOT
had been experimenting with UL for years for highway signage
find the PPC6700
big display slide-out keyboard sufficient for daily use.
Thanks to you David for the clue that there was a windows mobile version of
Slingbox player. Didn't know that. Loaded it up and it's great!
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi
To: [EMAIL
of
burstiness while imposing a limit on the average data transmission rate.
I can't say I understand the difference yet, but I'm motivated. Does anyone
else understand or know how to explain the difference?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Langseth
To: WISPA General List
getting a great deal from the discussion, and would love to hear
if other radios have built-in bw management and what method is use for
comparison (any Trango users who could possibly comment?).
Rich
From: Ryan Langseth
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:44 AM
the inbound bw anyway. So it now looks prudent to me to
have BOTH bw management built into the radios, AND at the head-end.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Jason
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
to a high
erlang per user, or equivalently described as a low oversubscription rate).
regards,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Have you thought
will share what bw
management algorithms they may have built-in.
thanks again,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 6:23 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Rich,
--- Here is the detail from
for developing applications ... so Moto abandonned it switching to Windows to
launch the Q phone. I think it casts doubt whether the market really wanted a
Linux platform phone. I mean, when you offer a supported Linux product and
nobody gives a hoot ... what would you conclude?
Rich
- Original
wireless interface to do this.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Frank
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] SmartPhone Happiness...
I have the T-Mobile version of this phone called the MDA. AFAIK Sprint and
T-Mobile do not strip
(such as embodied in VL) is far superior to
pre-allocated partitions in so, so many ways.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 6:57 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] churn,double play and why WLP is key - I finally
is it
illegal?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] StarOS or Microtik with TRCPQ clients...
Lonnie,
Patrick has a valid point. Truthfully, its getting close to that time
appreciate anyone who could
kick some sense into me should I be all wet.
Peace,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] StarOS or Microtik with TRCPQ clients...
OK, lets
from screwing up your channel
access if you were using something like CSMA.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived -
regardinginterference - Part 1
. I'm a great fan of
time framed systems myself.
It would be interesting to see how a bare OFDM TDD system
would have performed?
I think you'll get your wish. Isn't this what WiMAX is?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday
wet, as I am only
talking from what I've picked up from reading here ... and I've not had any
first-hand experience with real available pre-WiMAX gear that's out there.
Alvarion's got pre-WiMAX gear ... maybe Patrick can confirm, or alternatively
slap me back to reality! :-)
Rich
. Maybe
it meant no product like it yet available in UL 900 / 2.4 / 5??? Dunno. A
little help please?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:34 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios
havearrived
)
which could be trialed in US 5GHz UNII band? Sigh...
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 8:41 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Alvarion Comnet Radios have arrived
Lots of myth around WiMAX unlicensed. I've posted
Where's the disagreement Rich. I said the WiMAX MAC was not ready for UL
I hear you. My disagreement is that a UL wisp standard SHOULD have been ready
YEARS ago.
HiperMAN is different than HiperLAN/2 (I incorrectly called it HyperLAN2 in the
previous posts). You say the spec for UL WiMAX
business class services
in interference and another won't is tiresome, and just turns people off from
the good content that people appreciate.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 7:26 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA
that 1GByte list.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Schmidt
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 11:37 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] bits per mbps
True, Matt, often a better way.
Now, what to do with P2P abusers?
. . j o n a t h a n
they are getting something less than that.
If you have no allowance for even temporary interference, what short of a
licensed channel can accomplish that?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 5:17 PM
Subject: RE
IIRC).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 9:06 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Old News -- but can someone patent a mesh network
http://www.24-7pressrelease.com/view_press_release.php?rID=9156
in the 5.8 UNII band via
dual-band usage may be more troubling to wisps than bleed-over from DSRC
band usage.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WTB Orders
of DSRC members that dual-band
units not be able to operate using standard 802.11 MAC on the DSRC channels
which could put the dedicated DSRC safety functions at risk.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent
What part did you play in setting up this new standard, Rich?
I personally advocated DSRC be a different technology than wifi, and that
this was desirable to keep usage separate. What can I say? I worked for
Motorola at the time, and we proposed Canopy! I left the activity when
and scrolling to spot the offenders.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Eric Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Gremlin, redux
On 10/27/06, Rich Comroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We look at the traffic
,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: rwf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 2:24 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Sprint / Nextel to use 900mz for iDen
Rich-
Just so we all know where you are coming from and in the interest of Full
Disclosure
the outside, but were broadcast
storms between 2 or more customers (repeated through the APs). They act
similar to the symptoms you cited (a few minutes of extremely elevated
latency due to the short term load they place over the rf).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Eric Merkel [EMAIL
is targeted (WiMAX).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sprint / Nextel to use 900mz for iDen
I am not familiar with the terms you describe below and I am
.
But there are IIRC 15MHz of 25KHz channels that they hold licenses among at
800 (and the separate reverse channels 45MHz higher), and only 4MHz of
12.5KHz channels at 900 (including both TR, but I don't recall the T/R
split there).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Brian Webster [EMAIL
Isn't it the WiMAX mobility opportunity? Wasn't the original 802.16 specs
completely rewritten to add the opportunity for mobility?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 12
We got one of the Hawking Hi-Gain USB Wireless-G Dish Adapter just today.
Has a 5-led signal strength display. Great fun. It's dish antenna is
built-in but they may have one with an external antenna connection too.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED
-brained at all, but merely a
return to a more rational time when the FCC's mandate was to simply serve
the nation's spectrum needs (rather than serving the Treasury Dept).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday
for the benefit of the
American people, not managing spectrum to maximize government revenue. But
that's just me.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:48 AM
within the same AP and
independently feed each AP from a site router.
Rich
- Original Message -
From:
Tim Kerns
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:52
AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Network Storm
Ron,
Are you seeing icmp to other IP's
the telecom industry ISDN
eventually became known by several alternate names, one of which was
Inventions Subscribers Don't Need (my favorite).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Peter R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:55 PM
? (and I'd argue
typical long distance is within US). Is $60/mo unmetered local long
distance not available?
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP
ISDN myself for a few years. Like everything else, I
wanted to have my own hands-on experience with it ... and then dropped it
after a few years going back to analog POTS!
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Peter R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent
that are not required to
charge the same government assessments the the traditional providers are
required to charge (at the moment).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:41 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA
it was their equipment failure which caused the
problem.
ISDN ... got'ta love it ... not!
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP Is About More Than Replacing
equipment). Worse yet, the Ameritech
technicians had been issued ISDN capable CAT box's that were oblivious to D
channel delay (so they were swearing it was working because their test box
said it was working).
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Blake Bowers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General
s the same body, it quickly becomes impossible).
I know it's a religious preference / argument and
there's no right or wrong, only a preference... but youwanted to
know"why", so ...
peace
Rich
- Original Message -
From:
Mark Koskenmaki
To: WISPA General List
Se
Very cool. I love gadgets too ... got'ta play with them all.
Rich, I don't agree.
But I've no idea what I said that you disagree with. What I said was I
don't see VoIP providing advanced services that the consumer marketplace as
a whole is going to pick-up (for example, the way caller-id
FSK friends in the 3650 band. As long as the rules only type accept a
common interference avoidance spec (or a contention spec as many call it),
then unlicensed systems in the same band play nice.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List
.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Rich Comroe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650 equipment
Nah. What Charles misses in his commentary
But all the fancy schmancy technology you implement won't do
discharge in the antenna to pop an antenna
coupler on the board.But I'd check ifthe antenna mount is
grounded to the same ground as the radio board.
Rich
- Original Message -
From:
Kelly
Shaw
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 3:56 PM
Subject: [WISPA
credit
card clearing with LinkPoint CSI. Works great.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Brian Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] merchant accounts/credit cards
I do not have a terminal and do
,
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] merchant accounts/credit cards
On Wed, 31 May 2006, Rich Comroe wrote:
Too many orders lost from customers that don't have
of compliance to APCO user issued standards). In their market
APCO speaks for the buying power of the public safety users (as I believe
does CTIA).
Democracy, got'ta love it hate it at the same time.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
Rich, with all due respect, your idea has a REALLY big flaw in it.
I love debate. I'll take that as a challenge :-)
Once government sets a standard, it's going to be a very long time before
anything new comes along.
No Darwinism (government standards, really that's what the old Ma Bell
operators association, for public safety radio systems) has the same
influence over companies that make equipment for their market. EVEN IF THE
FCC CHOSE NOT TO IMPOSE REQUIREMENTS, AN EFFECTIVE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION CAN.
But that's a different discussion.
Cheers,
Rich
--
WISPA Wireless List
20dB or more excess
signal).
Canopy C/I is pretty much the same as all other technologies I'm aware of at
anywhere from typical to minimum signal levels. This of course omits the
high
constellation modulations which we all know requires significantly higher
C/I.
Rich
- Original Message
for weak
cable stations. Since the sat dish is outside and we're talking wireless
Internet coming in from outside too, any chance the ethernet is running
along side the coax that feeds the inside satellite decoder? That might be
able to take out all TV.
Rich
- Original Message -
From
appearing on the [Motorola] list.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Brian Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 1:56 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Mesh Equipment
Quoting Tom:
What often happens, is technical people
make
options are available today and
being developed for tomorrow's networks.
Moderator:
Sue Platner, President, The Northridge Group
Thanks for your help. Keep me posted.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists
Sent
99 matches
Mail list logo
