[WISPA] 3.65 NN License For Sale

https://www.ebay.com/itm/NN-License-LICENSING-FOR-THE-3-65-3-70-GHZ-SPECTRUM/142705978085 Thanks, Kevin Melson Eagle One Wireless\PC Station 2007 Hwy 72 E Corinth, MS 38834 662-287-1722 e...@e1w.com www.e1w.com ___ Wireless mailing list

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

On 12/27/16 18:36, Mike Hammett wrote: > I also have a feeling that there's a non-zero number of people that > won't give a shit and will run whatever they want whenever they want. You're right, of course, but I was trying to be optimistic. I do wish the FCC would go out and nuke those people.

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

;Seth Mattinen" <se...@rollernet.us> To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 8:34:37 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence On 12/27/16 16:50, Stuart Pierce wrote: > I set forth the point at a get together with the FCC in Gettysburg a few > years back that I

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

On 12/27/16 16:50, Stuart Pierce wrote: > I set forth the point at a get together with the FCC in Gettysburg a few > years back that I thought it was a waste of time to register the CPE's. > The base station already spews forth the frequency in a certain direction > anyway. > > That's when I

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

I set forth the point at a get together with the FCC in Gettysburg a few years back that I thought it was a waste of time to register the CPE's. The base station already spews forth the frequency in a certain direction anyway. That's when I realized I thought something else was afoot other than

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

On 12/27/2016 4:41 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 12/27/16 13:35, Fred Goldstein wrote: Since you have the license, you are entitled to put up more devices, just not as Incumbent. So what you might want to do is pull the FCC's ULS records in that area to see what registered devices the existing

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

On 12/27/16 13:35, Fred Goldstein wrote: > > Since you have the license, you are entitled to put up more devices, > just not as Incumbent. So what you might want to do is pull the FCC's > ULS records in that area to see what registered devices the existing > WISPs have in the area you're looking

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

, 2016 1:26 PM To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org> Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence I have a question to which I suspect I know the answer but wanted to defer to you smart guys. Let's say I'm opening up a new WISP and want to go into an area where there is an existing WISP a

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

reless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Sam Morris > Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 1:26 PM > To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org> > Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence > > I have a question to which I suspect I know the answer but wanted to defer to > you

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

On 12/27/2016 3:25 PM, Sam Morris wrote: I have a question to which I suspect I know the answer but wanted to defer to you smart guys. Let's say I'm opening up a new WISP and want to go into an area where there is an existing WISP already there. And let's say I want to use 3.65 GHz (non-LTE if

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Sam Morris > Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 1:26 PM > To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org> > Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence > > I have a question to which I suspect I know the answer but wanted to de

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Sam Morris Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 1:26 PM To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org> Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 Precedence I have a question to which I suspect I know the answer but wanted to defer to you smart guys. Let's say I'm opening up a new WISP and want

[WISPA] 3.65 Precedence

I have a question to which I suspect I know the answer but wanted to defer to you smart guys. Let's say I'm opening up a new WISP and want to go into an area where there is an existing WISP already there. And let's say I want to use 3.65 GHz (non-LTE if that matters) gear in that area, but

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > From: "Chadwick Wachs" <c...@auwireless.net> > To: "WISPA

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

et & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > -- > > *From: *"Chadwick Wachs" <c...@auwireless.net> > *To: *&quo

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

mail: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Chadwick Wachs" <c...@auwireless.net> > To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 11:09:41 AM > Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License > We are considering the purchase of a

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License On 11/18/2016 1:23 PM, Rick Harnish wrote: > Fred, > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I am under the impression that 3.55 - > 3.62 GHz > (70 MHz) will be allocated to (7) 10 MHz PAL licenses, which will be > auctioned per c

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

: +1.972.922.1443 Email: rick.harn...@baicells.com Follow us on Facebook for the latest news -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Fred Goldstein Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:11 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License On 11/18/2016 11:09 AM, Chadwick Wachs wrote: > We are considering the purchase of a 3.65 license from an existing > license holder who is not using it. We would be using it for a handful > of backhauls to get off of crowded 5

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

On 11/18/2016 11:09 AM, Chadwick Wachs wrote: We are considering the purchase of a 3.65 license from an existing license holder who is not using it. We would be using it for a handful of backhauls to get off of crowded 5GHz space. However, I'm not sure if this is a smart move (buying a 3.65

[WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

We are considering the purchase of a 3.65 license from an existing license holder who is not using it. We would be using it for a handful of backhauls to get off of crowded 5GHz space. However, I'm not sure if this is a smart move (buying a 3.65 license) and wanted some insight from those who

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

On 11/18/16 08:09, Chadwick Wachs wrote: > We are considering the purchase of a 3.65 license from an existing > license holder who is not using it. We would be using it for a handful > of backhauls to get off of crowded 5GHz space. However, I'm not sure if > this is a smart move (buying a 3.65

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

Ask Rick Harnish. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Chadwick Wachs wrote: > We are considering the purchase of a 3.65 license from an existing license > holder who is not using

[WISPA] 3.65 GHz power rules; do you really understand them?

When the FCC issued the Report and Order (3.65 ROhttps://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-56A1.pdf) for the 3650-3700 MHz band in March of 2005, it set power limits in a manner not widely understood by many in the WISP community, as it based the limits for fixed operations on a

[WISPA] 3.65 quiet zone letter and contact points

I need to see if anyone out there has a 3.65 quiet zone template letter to send to the grandfathered FSS earth stations. Also, I need contact information for the following earth stations so I know where to send the letters to... MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. New Skies Networks, Inc.

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 quiet zone letter and contact points

General List wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:28:06 -0400 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 quiet zone letter and contact points I need to see if anyone out there has a 3.65 quiet zone template letter to send

[WISPA] 3.65 sample letter to grandfather earth satellite

I was wondering if anybody has a letter they sent to the Grandfathered Earth Satellite stations to request a 3.65 waiver? I am in the SF bay area and I have a bunch of these stations in the area, and I want a well worded letter to send Thanks!!! ~Ken

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 sample letter to grandfather earth satellite

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would like that as well. I chatted with a 3.65 gear vendor, and they said the telcos don't care. It's the cable companies that do. Here in the Los Angeles area, I've found that to be the case. The Sprint/ATT ground stations are up in the Santa

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 sample letter to grandfather earth satellite

Below is what I sent to Sprint for their approval. It took 90 days for Sprint to respond but I got permission. I have some of the other earth stations contact information if you need it. -Cheers Dear Robin Cohen, I was given your email by Jerry Richardson

[WISPA] 3.65 License fee

What is the #.65 license fee? Steve Barnes RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

$200 Phil On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote: What is the #.65 license fee? Steve Barnes RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service WISPA Wants You! Join today!

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

Now that 3.65 has matured some. What are the results out there? The equipment is more money, is it worth it? On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Phil Curnutt pcurn...@gmail.com wrote: $200 Phil On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote: What is the #.65 license

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

After the 200.00, there is no fee for the actual radios. Not a bad deal, actually Ralph From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Phil Curnutt Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 9:12 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee $200

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

Wow, so I get free radios?? Hey, UBNT, I want 1500 XR3's!!! Sorry, I couldn't resist.. J From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of rwf Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 10:54 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

List' *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee After the 200.00, there is no fee for the actual radios. Not a bad deal, actually Ralph *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Phil Curnutt *Sent:* Friday, November 19, 2010 9:12 AM

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

Sorrry- I just hear that offer expired. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jason Hensley Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 12:01 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee Wow, so I get free radios?? Hey, UBNT, I want

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

:54 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee After the 200.00, there is no fee for the actual radios. Not a bad deal, actually Ralph From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Phil Curnutt Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 9:12

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

Of *David Hannum *Sent:* Friday, November 19, 2010 12:17 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee Speakig of 3.65 GHz . . . Have any of you been through the 3.65 GHz Form 621 process? How long does this take, and then how long to get the FCC to approve once you

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

, I want 1500 XR3’s!!! Sorry, I couldn’t resist……  J From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of rwf Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 10:54 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee After the 200.00, there is no fee

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

registered) took about a month. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of David Hannum Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 12:17 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee Speakig of 3.65 GHz . . . Have any

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

Of *David Hannum *Sent:* Friday, November 19, 2010 12:17 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee Speakig of 3.65 GHz . . . Have any of you been through the 3.65 GHz Form 621 process? How long does this take, and then how long to get the FCC to approve once you have

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee

...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of David Hannum Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 12:17 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 License fee Speakig of 3.65 GHz . . . Have any of you been through the 3.65 GHz Form 621 process? How long does this take, and then how long

[WISPA] 3.65 MIMO 2x2 CPE

I am surprised that there are a bunch of MIMO 2x2 APs (Alvarion, Moto, Airspan, etc) yet I cannot find a CPE. For foliage penetration the lack of the dual Tx on the CPE is a real disappointment. Has anyone seen a 802.16e true MIMO CPE?

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal I have a small wimax deployment with 20 subs and 130 phone lines and I wouldn't change a thing. All business customers with very high quality voip. I section all the voip traffic out with ugs and leave the Internet as best effort

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:38 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal I have a small wimax deployment

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Don't hold your breath for 802.16m! Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 7:23 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

We don't know about you, but we at California-based Aperto Networks are tired of waiting for stimulus dollars to trickle into the WISP business, so we are taking matters into our own hands. So Aperto Networks -- the 802.16 pioneer and WiMAX leader -- is excited to offer the 3.65 and 5 GHz

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

I think the new motorola is mimo. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote: We don't know about you, but we at California-based Aperto Networks are tired of waiting for stimulus dollars to trickle into the WISP business, so we are taking matters into

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:29 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal We don't know about you, but we at California-based Aperto Networks are tired of waiting for stimulus dollars to trickle into the WISP business, so we are taking matters into our own hands. So

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:30 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal I think the new motorola is mimo. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Matt lm7

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

far. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:30 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal I

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:30 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal I think the new motorola is mimo. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote: We don't know about you, but we

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

[mailto:wireless- boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:30 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal I think the new motorola is mimo. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote: We don't

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jeremie Chism Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:52 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal Subchannelization should help penetration a little also. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

...@apertonet.com Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:04 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal Indeed MIMO does help through trees according to people I trust, but again we default to the but at what cost question. We believe this to be especially true in more

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Yes, we support PPPoE. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:44 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal Do

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

We do support PPPoE Michael. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Michael Baird Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:04 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal Regular MIMO doesn't have to be expensive, UBNT has proven that. More complicated forms of diversity, well, that remains to be seen. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:33 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal 802.11 and its MIMO costs are not relevant to WiMAX and its MIMO costs. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

, March 18, 2010 9:17 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal Regular MIMO doesn't have to be expensive, UBNT has proven that.  More complicated forms of diversity, well, that remains to be seen. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

In my limited toe-dipping into 802.16d (fixed) wimax, the biggest challenge I see is with the EMS-based control. It's just a completely different model than what we're doing with all-in-one AP's now. I don't yet completely understand how it works, but it concerns me a bit that each company

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 8:04 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal They don't support PPPoE, at least not in anything but the indoor unit which isn't available for 3.65 or 802.16D. I didn't think Aperto's gear which is 802.16d supports MIMO either, that's

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:52 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal Subchannelization should help penetration a little also. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 18, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote: Do you support PPPoE in the SM? Heard that MIMO helps tree

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 9:45 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal What UBNT has shown is that one can go inexpensive

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

for everyone. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jayson Baker Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:00 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal Why would

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal What UBNT has shown is that one can go inexpensive alternatives and make them good products. The equivalent in WiMAX is PureWave Networks; their base station can do MIMO and beamforming and doesn't require an ASN-GW, which was the higher CAPEX

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

18, 2010 12:13 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal Apples to oranges. If you don't care about QoS and are happy with a best effort service offering with limited ability to do things like voice and video, the .11 stuff is fine. I appreciate it fits

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

misunderstanding when I see it. Patrick Leary Aperto Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:38 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

I have to admit if MIMO is made available in the 3.65 range I'm going to use it in my city. I've been catering to my rural customers because 2.4 and 5GHZ isn't clogged out there. We already have a 3.65 license but haven't deployed it yet, I anxiously await the MIMO gear on that frequency.

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Can someone clarify, is the Motorola 320 MIMO out of the box? Is it two (or more) antennas in the same polarity? Randy On 3/18/2010 1:23 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote: I have to admit if MIMO is made available in the 3.65 range I'm going to use it in my city. I've been catering to my rural

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal What you call a total myth (CPE x basestation interopoerability) is something that I actually tested in the field with 3.5 GHz .16e, which is not as popular as 2.3/2.5 WiBro/Clearwire/Yota frequencies. If Aperto has such interoperability issues, please

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

In the Motorola 320, the AP as 2 TX and 2 RX. The SM's have 2 TX and 1 RX. It will operate at MIMO Matrix B if optimal signal can be achieved. Otherwise it operates at MIMO A. -Eric On 3/18/2010 2:39 PM, Randy Cosby wrote: Can someone clarify, is the Motorola 320 MIMO out of the box? Is it

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Networks 813.426.4230 mobile -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:38 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal What you call a total myth (CPE x

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com wrote: For us WiMAX neophytes, could you explain the ASN gateway and why it's on your list of things you don't want? An ASN gateway sits between the Radio Access Network (where there are only tunnels from the base station to the

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Sm has 2 rx 1 tx Sent from my Motorola Startac... On Mar 18, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Eric Muehleisen ericm...@gmail.com wrote: In the Motorola 320, the AP as 2 TX and 2 RX. The SM's have 2 TX and 1 RX. It will operate at MIMO Matrix B if optimal signal can be achieved. Otherwise it operates

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Thanks. Now, on the Motorola 320, for example, the ASN gateway is not part of the picture, correct? On 3/18/2010 1:59 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Randy Cosbydco...@infowest.com wrote: For us WiMAX neophytes, could you explain the ASN gateway and why it's

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

You are correct. Thanks for the clarification. -Eric On 3/18/2010 2:58 PM, Gino Villarini wrote: Sm has 2 rx 1 tx Sent from my Motorola Startac... On Mar 18, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Eric Muehleisenericm...@gmail.com wrote: In the Motorola 320, the AP as 2 TX and 2 RX. The SM's have 2 TX

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Correct. No ASN. Service flows and classifications are set directly in the AP. Radius is built into the SM. It's fully L3 routeable. Currently no L2 functionality. -Eric On 3/18/2010 3:11 PM, Randy Cosby wrote: Thanks. Now, on the Motorola 320, for example, the ASN gateway is not part of

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com wrote: Thanks.  Now, on the Motorola 320, for example, the ASN gateway is not part of the picture, correct? According ot its specs, no ASN gateway is required: Low Cost Infrastructure The CAP 320 does not require ASN gateways or

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

-Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:38 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal What you call a total myth (CPE x basestation interopoerability) is something

[WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

I think I saw an ad here for Aperto or AirSpan or some other vendor who had 3.65 GHz gear with $200 SMs for life if you bought a particular package. If the company who sent that could re-send it to me off-list, or if it was on another list and someone here knows what I am talking about and can

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Here is what I got Hi folks, We don't know about you, but we at California-based Aperto Networks are tired of waiting for stimulus dollars to trickle into the WISP business, so we are taking matters into our own hands. So Aperto Networks -- the 802.16 pioneer and WiMAX leader -- is excited to

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

Is any one here actually sold on WiMax ? I am not sure what this gives us over say ... a Fixed system except higher pricing for equipment and a product that does not go as far... I could be wrong - guess its time for an education anyone know the benefits of WiMax? What I really want are non

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

to egg on New Years Jerry -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Glenn Kelley Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 6:07 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal Is any one here actually sold on WiMax ? I

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 21:07 -0400, Glenn Kelley wrote: Is any one here actually sold on WiMax ? Sold on...not me. Recognize that there ARE some benefits...YES! I am not sure what this gives us over say ... a Fixed system except higher pricing for equipment and a product that does not go

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

well put kinda where we are - it makes sense perhaps in some places just not convinced ours is one of them ... yet ... :-) On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Butch Evans wrote: On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 21:07 -0400, Glenn Kelley wrote: Is any one here actually sold on WiMax ? Sold on...not me.

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

anyone know the benefits of WiMax? I will leave most of the sales guys that man these lists, but there are a number of benefits to WiMAX that make it a better solution than simple polling or tdma approaches. After working some years in a WiMAX operator I couldn't agree more with Butch. The

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz WiMAX deal

I have a small wimax deployment with 20 subs and 130 phone lines and I wouldn't change a thing. All business customers with very high quality voip. I section all the voip traffic out with ugs and leave the Internet as best effort to guarantee service levels. All my subs can easily get 5-6

[WISPA] 3.65 BS

What is the issue? Is it the cost factor?? Are they being schmucks??? What is it. The Commission Part 25.256 states that the earth station _must negotiate_ in good faith with the terrestrial licensee (thats you) to arrive at _mutually agreeable_ operating _parameters_ to prevent

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 BS

In good faith is legal speak for waste of time. On 3/9/10, Bob Moldashel lakel...@gbcx.net wrote: What is the issue? Is it the cost factor?? Are they being schmucks??? What is it. The Commission Part 25.256 states that the earth station _must negotiate_ in good faith with the terrestrial

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 BS

On 3/9/2010 2:35 PM, Bob Moldashel wrote: What is the issue? Is it the cost factor?? Are they being schmucks??? What is it. The Commission Part 25.256 states that the earth station _must negotiate_ in good faith with the terrestrial licensee (thats you) to arrive at _mutually agreeable_

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 BS

is there a map of the exclusion zones? Bob Moldashel wrote: What is the issue? Is it the cost factor?? Are they being schmucks??? What is it. The Commission Part 25.256 states that the earth station "_must negotiate_ in good faith with the terrestrial licensee (thats you) to arrive

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 BS

There is a really good Google Earth one I've seen. Did you Google them? On 3/9/10, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote: is there a map of the exclusion zones? Bob Moldashel wrote: What is the issue? Is it the cost factor?? Are they being schmucks??? What is it. The Commission Part

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 BS

JFGIhttp://spectrumgenie.com/esmap.asp - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: Blair Davis Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 4:17 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 BS is there a map of the exclusion zones? Bob Moldashel wrote

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 BS

Yes, I did.  did not find anything thru google, but a buddy of mine pointed me at this http://zing.naviciti.com/ Josh Luthman wrote: There is a really good Google Earth one I've seen. Did you Google them? On 3/9/10, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote: is there a map of

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 BS

Everything goes smoothly if you have a good FCC lawyer in DC! Of course, thats big bucks too! I know one if you need him. Alternatively, go to your local congressman. I've done both of these and it really works. -RickG On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Bob Moldashel lakel...@gbcx.net wrote: What

[WISPA] 3.65 options for PtP

I need to do a lot (20+) very short distance links in a medium sized city that has a highly RF polluted environment. 5.x GHz isn't an option. Is there a CERTIFIED product that uses the Ubiquiti 3.65 card that would give me some reasonably priced bridges? I don't know if there is anything

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 options for PtP

throughput under ideal conditions. -- From: rwf r...@bsrg.org Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:01 PM To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 options for PtP I need to do a lot (20+) very short distance links in a medium sized

[WISPA] 3.65 GHz Coalition to approach FCC for rule changes

To list members: Yesterday, Redline hosted a conference call with 15 operator participants to kick off a coalition of operators who have deployed or plan to deploy broadband wireless systems in the 3.65 GHz band in the US, with the goal to discuss the current license exempt rules, some of the

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz Coalition to approach FCC for rule changes

: Kevin Suitor ksui...@redlinecommunications.com Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:39 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org; WISPA Members BTOP-BIP List btop-...@wispa.org Cc: Keith Doucet kdou...@redlinecommunications.com Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 GHz Coalition to approach FCC for rule changes

  1   2   3   >