Personally, I really wonder if it is possible to have 10 bits/HZ that a 60
Mbps channel in 6 MHz would have. 8VSB of HDTV was pretty advanced when it
was originally proffered as a standard. It does 19.2 Mbps in a 6 MHz
channel. Or approx 3 bits / Hz. That seems to be the upper limit of many
syst
Hmmm, didn't realize flipping houses was an ethical gray area...
(gosh, buy a distressed property, gut and redo the kitchen and bathroom,
give it some landscaping- and make some dough. That is unethical? You know
some of the original colonies of the new world had rules against charging
interest
ook
> pretty sharp as well. I know the roughnecks around here poured some
> serious money into those holes they punched in the ground. I think they
> are pumping plenty of dollars back out now.
>
> chris
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM
Once upon a time, a man said that hell was full so they sent him to St. Geo.
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Cosby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333 heat
> Ow, definitely don't want to install those here in
n 3.65Ghz and CBP
>A lot of times, flipping a house is nothing more than putting on a fresh
> coat of paint.
>
>
> --
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck
What is your opinion about the greatness of WiMax based upon?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP
>I believe that WiMax is great... greate
I have been doing solar powered radio sites for 25 years. I will never do
one where commercial power is available. Not sure how folks buying panels
at $5/watt can think this is a good deal compared with 7 cents per 1000
watts.
- Original Message -
From: "Rogelio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
ng we need to get up to speed with
> the rest of the world on what has been accepted as the standard for
> broadband delivery over wireless in 3.4 thru 3.8 GHz bandspace.
> Scriv
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
I do not think that is in conflict with what you have deployed. Is
> Motorola planning to deploy a system for 3.65 GHz? I have not heard
> anything about that.
> Scriv
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Canopy
re paying about $.30
>
> gino
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 1:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; WISPA General List
>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?
>
>
; actively looking for options
>
>
> gino
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 2:28 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] solar equipment / partners?
>
> Do you go solar where th
eir feedback?
>
> I could only see canopy 400 working on this bandthey could also port
> their wimax solution but thats a different price range
>
> gino
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 1
3.65Ghz and CBP
> It does mine.
>
> Inflating the price of a needed commodity - that is, increasing it with no
> added value - is unethical, in my estimation.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Chu
lieve once production ramps up, the panels will be $1/watt.
>
>
> --
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL
amps up, the panels will be $1/watt.
>
>
> --
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WIS
er out
> might be considered not-acceptable ("unethical") by others.
>
> Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
>> Then I guess the precludes any participation in any mutual fund or almost
>> any type of broker investments.
>> Oh well...
>> - Original Message -
&
ce. How you confuse this with normal buy/sell of real things and/or
> ownership of entities, I am not sure.
>
>
> ++++++++
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General
gt; building businesses solely for the purpose of selling it, nor about
> speculators who use leveraged debt to drive up the price of consumer
> commodities for no added value.
>
>
> ++++++++
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck Mc
Steel strap iron or Unistrut. Unistrut has lots of brackets and fasteners
but would not look as nice IMHO as a custom made strap steel unit. You
could always buy the 36 incher and have someone extend it. Yes, it will
lose some galvanizing but gray/silver paint will make up for the loss.
ke Hammett"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Increased spectral efficiency
>> Advanced antenna support (the only benefit I understand is increased
>> signal
>> margin)
>> Higher likelihood of multiple vendors vs. many previous BWA technologies,
>>
I totally agree. I am planning to deploy 3.65 in this area and will be one
of the first if not the first. If there is a plethora of real life
experience with this band with the existing products, I am all ears. But so
far, I don't know of any actual "WiMax" 802.16d or e equipment deployments
ps
> at
> the lowest modulation.
>
> We plan to go live with the product this month... As soon as we get our
> routing situation fixed.
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Chuck McCown - 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I totally agree. I am planning to dep
E rate purchases have to be approved 1-2 years ahead at times. They ask for
more than they need in many cases since they are not the ones paying the
bill.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 8:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] POE
> Can someone explain
Yes. What specifically are you needing to source. We built our own.
- Original Message -
From: "John McDowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Motorola Canopy User Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 4:45 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Streamlined DC Powered Sys
And you are sure it is that end of the link that went bad?
- Original Message -
From: "Kurt Fankhauser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:51 PM
Subject: [WISPA] water in feed horn
> Anyone ever have any water get into a pacwireless 5ghz grid
No, they stay reflectors. But Yagis have a huge problem when coated with
ice.
> -Original Message-
> From: "Kurt Fankhauser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:38:24
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] water in feed horn
>
>
> Don't grids stop working when th
5
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 7:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] water in feed h
Generally speaking, when the FCC specifies antennas they are more interested
in the pattern than the gain. Specifically, they have a beamwidth and
sidelobe suppression mask that they insist upon. This is always true with
satellite uplink dishes. Not totally familiar with the point to point fi
Thanks for pointing that out. In my mind that was what I was attempting to
say.
I guess I failed to take it to completion. I was trying to make the point
that gain ~~ size~~ beamwidth but only in the broad general case. The FCC
is not really caring about gain or size(in these cases); but sinc
Hyperbole is not helpful to discourse.
If you want no FCC go to some other country.
Are you really the anarchist you come across as?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Report: FCC to Punish Comc
er to present the positive benefits that we
> bring to the population, like the TVA. You can't argue with motherhood
> and virtue and that's what the message is. Flailing at boogiemen isn't a
> help. The fact that WISPA helps bring the bottom-of-the-list USA to the
>
We have had the CALEA pain in the telco side for a decade. Believe me, it
was much more expensive to become compliant if you were a LEC. Fact of the
matter is that the internet is becoming the defacto alternate PSTN network
and when you are a public utility you become beholden to the public yo
Let us know when that coffin is nailed shut. I am sure there will be a wisp
ready to step up and take over your customers.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No, it is just one more nail in our coffin, removing what I consider to
> be
> the single greatest advantage to u
w00t
- Original Message -
From: "Forrest W Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Topic change - Trade
AssociationWas:Report:FCCtoPunishComcast Over Web Blocking
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> No matter how many t
Upon reading some of the original requirements, I decided that etherreal
would do the trick.
(That was after about a half dozen consulting, hardware and software vendors
tried to convince me to buy their solutions that ranged from $9K to $50K)
- Original Message -
From: "Forrest W Christ
For telcos, that assistance was in the form of CALEA complaint software
upgrades for a very few brands of switches. If you were Nortel you were OK.
I think the same thing with GTE but the switches we had did not have an FBI
supplied software load so we got zero assistance for CALEA.
- Origi
Could you please elaborate about a Class B? This is new to me.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dragonwave antenna pattern for RM
> Actually...if you're willing to accept Clas
Then I guess you do not want to evolve into a public utility. Too bad, as
the rest of the WISP industry is becoming defacto public utility. You
really need to become familiar with the principle of common carriage. The
legal doctrine can be traced clear back to the Roman Empire. Personally I
ulated public utility", 99% of all WISP's will be
> GONE.
>
> What a way to promote industry health and speak for WISP's
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3"
The article was good for our industry. There are tons of absolute dB
readings like dBuV, dBrnc0 and dBspl. I always explain it as simply a
logarithmic way of stating a measuring unit like power or force. You could
have dBmpg (miles per gallon) if you wanted. A naked dB by itself is
nothing
You are correct. I apologize.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] muddy frog
> Why don't you Not. I have enough junk mail don't need that as well. If
> muddy and chuck ha
I apologize to everyone on the list for continuing to take the bait. I was
warned weeks ago by others about him.
I google'd this guy and found he carries on these diatribes on other lists
and other venues and it is generally the same stuff.
>From his website I find the following;
"Together, [t
;-)
Dang, that could be considered a reply, couldn't it.
Must stop. Must not press send
- Original Message -
From: "Rogelio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] end of thread
> C
Tx power + antenna gain - free space path loss + rx antenna gain =rssi.
- Original Message -
From: "Rogelio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:24 PM
Subject: [WISPA] formulas behind pathloss+RSSI calculators?
> I'm looking for the math behind
Here is an example.
TX power of 30 dBm (1 watt)
+ 10 dB antenna gain = 40 dBm EIRP
- Path loss (say 10 miles at 915 MHz) 116 dB
+ 10 dB RX antenna gain
= -66 dBm RX signal level
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Art sent a note to frog and tried to post a cc here. Not being a subscriber
to this list it bounced.
Being a 77 year old elder statesman of the telco industry, he has alot of
perspective.
If someone wants a copy of his reply to mr frog, hit me off list.
- Original Message -
From: "Blake
So, what down converted 802.11a systems are there for 900?
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents
> Even thought this thread is a bi
And these are as robust and immune from interference as Canopy?
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents
> >So, what down converted 802
Their 45 has promise.
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents
> Hi,
>
> You are correct... my mistake.
>
> However, the MM5 was g
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 2:41 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] top 10 benefits of Wimax in 3.65ghz - my 2 cents
>
>
> - Origi
CopperCom... Hmmm. Taqua is still around and strong. I have a story to
tell you about Taqua someday.
Motorola: There still is no SM left behind. The 400 is a totally different
product line. But they are still coming out with new Canopy products. The
line may bifurcate, but they are still
I have been on both ends of this as a manufacturer. I made airborne PBX
systems that were installed in the avionics bay of head-of-state, military
command and control and corporate fleet aircraft. Almost got airforce1. (I
could only do 48 phones and they needed more!) I was very proud of tha
Not true. Not true at all. Cable Companies are not rate of return
regulated. Every dollar they spend is below the line. The ILECS are
strictly regulated as to what can be spent above the line. Tarrifed rates
ONLY support tarrifed services.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi" <
d
> installing solar cells as a replacements anytime soon, so if the electric
> company were to engage in broadband as suggested, it would be scary for
> all
> other broadband carriers.
>
> - Larry
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM
I wonder if the chip could be changed to give you more memory.
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Travis Johnson wrote:
>
>>And although I hav
not
serve any of our certificated areas with our WISP.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Just what we need.
> Not exactly true. The POTS inf
vice in
> the U.S. I sometimes slip and refer to them generically as ILECs. As you
> validly point out, some independent ILECs continue to exist and have much
> more flexibility in their service offerings.
>
> - Larry
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PR
There used to be a graphic on one of the Canopy marketing pages showing the
loading vs latency curves for polled vs non polled systems. Lightly loaded
802.11 will always do better but once you get up to 20 or 30 users, the polling
type systems start to shine with their fixed latency.
- Or
I am surprised an open source project has not sprung up to do this.
- Original Message -
From: "Japhy Bartlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostations
> Maybe Mikrotik should take a note from Microsoft's book..
or buy equipment
> that already has the license for it.
>
> Sam Tetherow
>Sandhills Wireless
>
> Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
>> I am surprised an open source project has not sprung up to do this.
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Ja
But you really are not harming the subsidized utility. For example, we have
about 900 customer on our public utility. We charge them a little more than
$10 for local service. $9000 per month. But the FUSF, SUSF, and NECA
settlement probably amounts to 2-3 million a year. If you take my
cus
Just got back from a county commission meeting. We appealed conditions
placed on a conditional use permit for a new tower. They wanted us to
provide a full acre of fall protection clearance around the tower (leased
land). That acre would be conveyed to the county. They wanted the parcel
fen
r is?
>
>
> --
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:
/www.ics-il.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Deal
>
>
>> That is what they make D
That is pretty high compared to the good deals we are seeing. We have BW
from $6 to $14/meg in this area.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA List"
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 8:07 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Bandwidth Deal
> While searching for pipes fo
ndwidth Deal
> Single or multiple hop(s)?
>
> Is a 60 mile single hop possible?
>
>
> --
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Since they are full duplex, they really don't add latency.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Deal
>> We have 60 mile Dragonwave systems out here. Saving 2-3K per month pay
; or only the state they operate in? Got a dumbfounded idea up my
> sleeve.
>
> Scottie
>
> -- Original Message ------
> From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: WISPA General List
> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:48:0
0:01:19 -0500
>
>>Delivered to your door, no matter where that door is?
>>
>>
>>--
>>Mike Hammett
>>Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "Chuck McCown - 3
I am an ILEC.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Deal
>I think you mean clec. ILEC is people like at&t or verizon.
>
> Clec is all the upstarts.
>
> Though I co
Iowa used to have over 100 ILECs. I think they still do.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Deal
> AT&T, Verizon, and Qwest are RBOCs, a subset
This list shows 142 ILECs in Iowa alone.
http://www.yourclosestconnection.com/itc_list.asp
We have 13 in Utah.
Oregon has 30 ILECs.
http://www.ota-telecom.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=36
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The IF frequency between the TV dish and the TV receiver is a lower
frequency. Not sure how low, they used to be about 1 GHz 25 years ago. But
that could be where the problem is.
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday,
SS7 A links are very touchy. All radios I have used that were designed for
T1 work much better than using TDM over IP mux gear. Noise is no issue.
There isn't another transmitter within 25 miles. I have used PCom, Proxim
and Westernmux T1 radios at other places with no problems at all. This
This will work. The user is using a rotopol to convert a canopy to
horizontal polarization.
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 4:53 PM
Subject: [WISPA] wow
> And here is what happens when someone does
I don't think there is an issue if you fully disclose to your customer
exactly what you are doing. If you tell the customer that you do your very
best to kill or impair bittorrent then they have the choice of continuing
with your or going somewhere else. Comcast originally got pinched for not
neral List
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] wow
Does it also add gain or just change polarity?
Travis
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
This will work. The user is using a rotopol to convert a canopy to
horizontal polarization.
- Original Message -
Fro
That's good stuff. I wonder why we are still running two coax' on all of
our installs. Gotta ask our DTV trainers about that. Still, none of these
bands overlap bands we are using so that is a good thing.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA Genera
Shannon theorm states that a channel capacity is constrained by the
following equation:
C=B log(2)(1+S/N)
Where the capacity of the channel is C, B is the bandwidth of the channel, S
is signal and N is noise.
Rearranging terms and holding some things constant. Lets consider noise and
signal =1
A good value system is WiLife by LukWerks. They were purchased by Logitech
so I am not sure if the name stayed the same.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA List"
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 4:29 PM
Subject: [WISPA] IP based security system
>I am
Yep, Hams OWN this band. We are simply visitors.
- Original Message -
From: "Lance Jahnke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 2:01 PM
Subject: [WISPA] 900mhz - Ham
> It's my understanding that as long as the Ham operator is within his
> operating privileges, any in
OK, to warm things up, I proffer the following:
Ham radio is essential to the emergency communications network of the
planet. When all else fails, hams and the American Red Cross can always get
business done. At 5.7 GHz, the distance record is 3,982 km. At 903 MHz the
distance record is 4,06
> OK, to warm things up, I proffer the following:
>
> Ham radio is essential to the emergency communications network of the
> planet. When all else fails, hams and the American Red Cross can always
> get business done. At 5.7 GHz, the distance record is 3,982 km. At 903
> MHz the distance re
L PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Motorola II] [WISPA] Court Injunction
> Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
>>
>>> They were here first and will be here last. Pardon the image but we are
>>> the ones "stin
land of the
> great unwashed) Numbers are diminishing all the time.
>
> Springfield MO just announced they are canceling theirs
> this year.
>
> And yes, I can say it. KD4RME
>
>
> Don't take your organs to heaven,
> heaven knows we need them down here!
> Be an
That is good to hear. I was the president of my university ham club many
years ago. I let my license expire due to ignorance of the due date. I
have never bothered to renew it. I never made extra 'cause I couldn't do
one minute of perfect copy @ 20 wpm. I had some mistakes.
- Original
Sharples
> WA6HAS, ARRL, QCWA
> Qorvus Systems, Inc.
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 6:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction
>
>
>&g
I prefer RadioMobile.
- Original Message -
From: "John Seaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4
> We use it every day for running path profiles and microwave reliability
> estimates for customers... I wo
August 05, 2008 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Court Injunction
> Chuck, I hope you'll consider going after that "Extra" now. It's never
> too
> late...
>
> Rick
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
"The industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) radio bands were originally
reserved internationally for the use of RF electromagnetic fields for
industrial, scientific and medical purposes other than communications."
So, other than communications were primary, then HAM, then Part -15. My 25
kW
Outdoor rated?
How much power do they need?
- Original Message -
From: "Joshua Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IP based security system
>I currenty have a customer that is using Intellinet 550710 cameras, the
> quality is accepta
What can it do that Radio Mobile does not?
I have been engineering microwave paths since 1978. Back in the day it was
curved path profile paper and counting elevation lines on a topo map. I
have used about a half dozen software products over the years, including the
original on line version f
With that much power on UHF TV a rusty nail in a fence could be mixing that
channel with some other broadcast frequency and making a signal on your
frequency. Anything is possible when you get close to high power RF. Can
you drive a quarter mile away and get a good signal? Try to see if the
Which Chuck are you addressing here?
- Original Message -
From: "Mac Dearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT Nstreme
> Chuck,
>
> That was neither neighborly nor a nice comment to make from one vendor to
> a
>
> Who is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Mac
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
>> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 1:06 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [W
We use a hybrid approach, asterisk for many things, and a Vox like company
(it may even be Vox, not sure as I just approve the payments, Bryan is the
one that vetted the company). Our VoiP system is form fit and function
equivalent to a wired telephone from Qwest. We even port their Qwest numb
We don't care about CDRs as we give an all you can eat long distance
feature. We will look at the totals month by month to see if we are making
out OK or loosing our shirt.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, August 09,
The following link has contact info for all the GFRs. Contact the GFR in
your area to see if Crossroads Wireless is trying to get loans or grants to
serve areas you already serve. The GFRs need to know you. Who knows, they
might even have some money for you.
http://www.usda.gov/rus/telecom/st
Whoever it is we are using charges extra for the intl calls.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP DeploymentsI'm serious
>> We don't care about CDRs as we give an al
Not sure if we are offering intl. I think we decided to sell them phone
cards if they want intl.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP DeploymentsI'm serious
>> Who
201 - 300 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
