I emailed Scriv last week and told him I would be
there to speak,
Do you know if they will serve dinner and/or
drinks? :-)
Mac
- Original Message -
From:
JohnnyO
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 1:31
PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC
: Friday, February 17, 2006 1:32
PMTo: WISPA General ListSubject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Katrina Meeting
/ March 6
I can be there - I have to pick up a RohnSSV tower
just south of Jackson... Would be a perfect opportunity to
kill 2 birds with 1 stone. I'd really like to attend
this.JohnnyOOn
General List
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 7:13 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Katrina Meeting / March 6
JohnnyO,
Would you PLEASE promise shave and bath before representing us? J
Hmm That response sounds framiliar
:-)
-B-
Rudy Worrell wrote:
Gents and fellow concerned WISP operators. I had the same questions most of
you have regarding FCC form 477. I went directly to the source as you will
see below. I got an answer and it is stated below.
At this
Rudy Worrell wrote:
I don't have the answers but we should now think of a few things that come
to mind as we move forward.
1.) Security to this list (my customers can join along with anyone else)
Paid WISPA Principle Members have a members only list server called
[EMAIL PROTECTED] It is
John,
Thank you for the response. I am hoping that everyone including myself will
pony up be a paid member.
My issue is simply not having the time. Installer,CEO,support, tower engineer,
and I am sure you know the rest.
I know we all work but is there anyone out there with some free time
- Original Message -
From: Rudolph Worrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form requirement
John,
Thank you for the response. I am hoping that everyone including myself
will
pony up
)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Will [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC regs question
This only applies to the 2.4ghz ISM band
List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC regs question
So, can I use a radio capable of more than the legal limit as long as I
turn it down to a legal level programatically?
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Jason,
1. My ap with 3 separate 120deg sectors
DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC regs question
So, can I use a radio capable of more than
Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Will [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC regs question
This only applies to the 2.4ghz ISM band there are different
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC regs question
This only applies to the 2.4ghz ISM band there are different rules
for the 900mhz and 5.8 ISM band plus different rules for the UNII rules.
The ISM rules state, 900mhz is a total of 36dbm
Tom List,
To verify that I understand,
1. My ap with 3 separate 120deg sectors and radios is limited to 1 watt
EIRP per sector/radio, because it is PtMP.
2. My cpe's get the 3 to 1 rule because they are PtP
Right?
More questions:
1. What about using types of antennas that are not
Jason,
1. My ap with 3 separate 120deg sectors and radios is limited to 1 watt
EIRP per sector/radio, because it is PtMP.
No. Each AP radio/antenna combination is allowed a total of 36 db EIRP
(4watt).
(radio itself not to exceed 30 db + additional antenna 6 db, however no
reason radio
So, can I use a radio capable of more than the legal limit as long as I
turn it down to a legal level programatically?
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Jason,
1. My ap with 3 separate 120deg sectors and radios is limited to 1
watt EIRP per sector/radio, because it is PtMP.
No. Each AP radio/antenna
This only applies to the 2.4ghz ISM band there are different rules for
the 900mhz and 5.8 ISM band plus different rules for the UNII rules.
The ISM rules state, 900mhz is a total of 36dbm EIRP no mater if it is
multi point or PtP. 5.8ghz is 1 watt power and as large a antenna you
can put on
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] USF fund issues
I thought I'd take a few minutes to comment on the USF and other
attempts to tax VoIP as if it were a fresh new source of tax revenue for
Democrats everywhere. Of course just like the last draft from a
congressional staffer re-writing
Marlon,
Where can one find out what the telco gets in usf funding? I'd like to
know what the rate is around here...
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Out here the telco gets $109 per month per pots line in usf funds. I
think that's why they require a pots line in order to have dsl
?
-Original Message-
From: Marlon K. Schafer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 7:16 PM
To: Conversations over a new WISP Trade Organization
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] USF fund issues
Did anyone ever take this issue on? We have only about 2 more
To: Conversations over a new WISP Trade Organization
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] USF fund issues
Did anyone ever take this issue on? We have only about 2 more weeks to
make
comments.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED
not a member. Gee
really?
-Original Message-
From: Marlon K. Schafer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 7:16 PM
To: Conversations over a new WISP Trade Organization
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] Re: [WISPA FCC] USF fund issues
Did anyone ever take this issue on? We
Did anyone ever take this issue on? We have only about 2 more weeks to make
comments.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Conversations over a new WISP Trade Organization wireless@wispa.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005
@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
I am not sure who is tasked with writing a report on our visit to the FCC.
I do think it would be interested to do a conference call with interested
parties to discuss.
-Matt
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Cool
Cool!
Just this week WISPA had a team at the FCC who met with Fred. Hopefully
they'll issue some reports to us all soon :-).
laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)
Where is the report from the FCC trip a couple weeks back?
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Cool!
Just this week WISPA had a team at the FCC who met with Fred.
Hopefully they'll issue some reports to us all soon :-).
laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
Where is the report from the FCC trip a couple weeks back?
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Cool!
Just this week WISPA had a team at the FCC who met with Fred.
Hopefully they'll issue some reports to us all soon
-- Original Message
---
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:48:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC meeting
Word of advice
I agree tht disaster relief should be a large focus of the meeting. Not only
- Original Message -
From: Dawn DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC meeting
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Hiya,
Talk about vauge.
There are a number of new people
Marlon,
Just a little curious as to what message WISPA is trying to portray at
the FCC meeting?
Thanks,
Dawn
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Broadband
- Original Message - From: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC meeting
Hiya,
There are a number of new people at the FCC. And those there who are
our
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Hiya,
Talk about vauge.
There are a number of new people at the FCC. And those there who are
our friends need to be kept in the loop as to what's going on.
Kept in the loop? The WISP Industry is not new. What will you tell them
that they don't
I'm interested.
-Matt
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Hi All,
I'm setting up some FCC meetings for late Oct. or early Nov. I need 5
people to go.
I'm looking mainly for folks that haven't been there before. We'll
get together after the team is picked and talk about what we'd
Always interested
DSJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 1:18 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Cc: isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com
Subject: [WISPA] FCC meeting
Hi All,
I'm
-
From: Barry at Mutual Data [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Slides that didn't make it in time to be used
Hello Rick,
The last slide should be pulled as the climber is not using safety
equipment
Rick:
It's not so much that FCC personnel would know what they're looking at,
but if it's distributed as part of the official record, any competitors
to the WISP industry who do know they're looking at would be quick to
point out any issues TO the FCC to discredit WISPs.
ANYTHING that is
be surprised if anyone with the FCC
r would actually note the omission. :-)
r Rich
r - Original Message -
r From: Barry at Mutual Data [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
r Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 10:21 AM
r Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Slides that didn't make
Is is just me, or is there no representation from WISPs at
all??
I'm watching it right now trying to figure out what is going on here,
but it looks like we have been snubbed again.
Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Harnish wrote:
September 14, 2005
*_PARTICIPANTS FOR _*
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 2:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Open Commission meeting - Real Audio
Is is just me, or is there no representation from WISPs at
all??
I'm watching it right now
Charles Wu wrote:
Have you read the Part-15 report to the FCC?
http://www.broadbandwirelessreports.com/pressreleases/files/FCC%20Briefing%2
009152005.pdf
-Charles
I quickly skimmed through the document and found a very honorable
mention of WISPA and Mac Dearman.
I think WISPA should be
Hey Matt,
I am sure you may have figured it out but in case you haven't, here it
is..
By Mark Rockwell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
September 15, 2005
The FCC is moving to get new efforts in place to support the recovery
of telecommunications in the Gulf Coast region in the wake of
Wow, right in my backyard. Anyone from WISPA attending?
-Matt
Rick Harnish wrote:
*_SCHEDULE AND VENUE CHANGE: _*
*_FCC TO HOLD OPEN COMMISSION MEETING_*
*_IN ATLANTA, GEORGIA at 11:00 am_*
*Please note that the time and venue for the Federal Communications
Commission’s September Open
Title: Message
great...so WISPA should be able to do THEIR OWN
presentation
in
addition to the $500 donation for a WISPA designated attendee...I can volunteer
PR graphic resources to help with publicity and to put the presentation
together
-Charles
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 12:52 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Open Commission Meeting Moved
This just in from Michael Anderson. Why don't you contact him and see if
you can get clearance to attend.
Hi
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Open Commission Meeting Moved
Wow, right in my backyard. Anyone from WISPA
Mike mentioned he is not going to be there t
opresent in person. Does that mean WISPA can send a representative or does it
meen seats are full?
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Harnish
To: 'WISPA
, September 14, 2005 4:08
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Open Commission
Meeting Moved
Mike mentioned he is not going to be there t
opresent in person. Does that mean WISPA can send a representative or does it
meen seats are full?
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL Wireless, IncIntAirNet
Too bad WISPA can't offer a larger venue so more people
could attend vs. having at Bells facility :-)
DSJ
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
HarnishSent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:39 PMTo:
'WISPA General List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Bullit'Subject:
I talked with Mike and offered to attend, but he said his invitation no
longer exists.
-Matt
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Mike mentioned he is not going to be there t opresent in person. Does
that mean WISPA can send a representative or does it meen seats are full?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
jurman
To: 'WISPA General List' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;
'Bullit'
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 4:29
PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Open Commission
Meeting Moved
Too bad WISPA can't offer a larger venue so more people
could attend vs. having at Bells facility :-)
DSJ
Actually, we could. My building has a press briefing room specifically
for this sort of thing.
-Matt
dustin jurman wrote:
Too bad WISPA can't offer a larger venue so more people could attend
vs. having at Bells facility :-)
DSJ
Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 4:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Open Commission Meeting Moved
Actually, we could. My building has a press
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 4:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Open Commission Meeting Moved
Actually, we could. My building has a press briefing room specifically
for this sort of thing
Maybe, Marlon's friends can get us some assistance moving the venue.
DSJ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 5:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Open Commission Meeting
]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 5:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Open Commission Meeting Moved - speaking of
governmentpresentations
If you are just looking for speakers; I speak
I don't think the FCC has much choice in the matter. The Supreme Court has
ruled that they can't force the unbundled elements issue.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)
601 - 655 of 655 matches
Mail list logo
