Re: [WISPA] question of the day

> > Joe > > From: Mark Radabaugh [mailto:m...@amplex.net <mailto:m...@amplex.net>] > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 11:23 AM > To: joe.mil...@dslbyair.com <mailto:joe.mil...@dslbyair.com>; WISPA General > List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] question of the day

Re: [WISPA] question of the day

he world?” Joe From: Mark Radabaugh [mailto:m...@amplex.net] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 11:23 AM To: joe.mil...@dslbyair.com; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] question of the day Kind of an open ended question - do you have any more specifics of what they are looking for?

Re: [WISPA] question of the day

Kind of an open ended question - do you have any more specifics of what they are looking for? I think you already know most of this - access to capital, spectrum, competent employees and management, vertical assets, and bandwidth, all at reasonable rates are the keys to a profitable fixed wirel

[WISPA] question of the day

I am trying to make forward progress in the state government in MS and this question was raised: "What does it take to establish a profitable Fixed Wireless system and how this can compete with AT&T?" I could use some input on the different ways you have done this. Regards, Joe Mil

Re: [WISPA] question for the group

Cell: (303) 746-3590 Skype: danieldwhite E-mail: daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com<mailto:daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Chris Stradtman Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 12:11 PM To: WISPA General List Subject:

Re: [WISPA] question for the group

I hadn't heard that, but that might explain why I can't find any then :-) Thx Chris sent from my moto-X On Jun 30, 2014 12:13 PM, "Josh Luthman" wrote: > I could be wrong, but I thought I read someone saying those bands are not > allowed to be used for ptmp purposes in FCC land. > > > Josh Lu

Re: [WISPA] question for the group

I could be wrong, but I thought I read someone saying those bands are not allowed to be used for ptmp purposes in FCC land. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Chris Stradtman < cstradt...@greenpointcom

[WISPA] question for the group

Hi all, Is anybody aware of any manufacturers making PtMP gear in the 70/80/90 ghz ranges? All I can seem to find is PtP Thanks, Chris ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] question for the group

If you have to ask this question, you might be better suited to hire someone to complete this install, just being honest... On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Bret Clark wrote: > That of course would imply that the FCC themselves were professionals > and in my dealings with them I haven't found t

Re: [WISPA] question for the group

That of course would imply that the FCC themselves were professionals and in my dealings with them I haven't found that to be the case! On 09/19/2013 11:06 PM, Blair Davis wrote: Oh boy! IANAL... That phrase 'Professional Installer' is likely the single most contentious thing the FCC has don

Re: [WISPA] question for the group

Oh boy! IANAL...  That phrase 'Professional Installer' is likely the single most contentious thing the FCC has done in the last 20 years... In general, it seems that as long as you follow the EIRP and frequency rules and don't cause interference to a licensed us

Re: [WISPA] question for the group

I have never seen this enforced in my limited experience. Most manufacturers have classes you can attend to become a 'professional'. ryan On 9/19/13 7:53 PM, Chris Stradtman wrote: Hi all, Most of my work is done inside so I don't really deal with most of the WISP issues. However I'm be

[WISPA] question for the group

Hi all, Most of my work is done inside so I don't really deal with most of the WISP issues. However I'm being asked by a client to do an outside install. This is likely to be in the 5Ghz range. I've found a reference to "Devices must be professionally installed when operating in the 5470 – 572

Re: [WISPA] Question about ISM and UNII

Light them up through the windows from across the street. We have done this to hotels that have rules like that. They are not in control of radio waves coming in, just physical access to the building. On 8/22/2012 9:44 AM, Chris Stradtman wrote: > this is actually inside a structure not on top

Re: [WISPA] Question about ISM and UNII

Interestingly the property management company was caught caught by the all RF line in the contract as they wanted to sell wifi and was told they couldn't as per the contract They didn't understand the repercussions of the phrase "all RF" when they signed the contract. It's also like a 20 o

Re: [WISPA] Question about ISM and UNII

It's certainly the case that a building owner can control whether radios or other wireless gear are installed on their property and they can lease any or all of those rights to anyone they please. However, they can't control the RF signals going into and through their building from elsewhere.

Re: [WISPA] Question about ISM and UNII

The Commission had a real problem with exclusivity arrangements by carriers similar to this that prevented co-location a few years back. I don't know what the outcome was. Same situation where carriers were saying other landline carriers could not enter a location because they had exclusive ri

Re: [WISPA] Question about ISM and UNII

this is actually inside a structure not on top… but I guess that still applies… Thanks, Chris On Aug 22, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote: > Yes, > They can contract that with the building/tower owner. All it means is > if you want to go on the tower you can't use those frequencies. Yo

Re: [WISPA] Question about ISM and UNII

Yes, They can contract that with the building/tower owner. All it means is if you want to go on the tower you can't use those frequencies. You can erect a structure on the next available land plot and use them. Matt Hoppes Director of Information Technology Indigo Wireless +1 (570) 723-7312

[WISPA] Question about ISM and UNII

Folks, I'm dealing with a situation in a structure where an incumbent cell carrier is claiming full control of the RF spectrum (if I understand correctly from 3 kHz to 300 GHz ). This claim is based on a contract with the b

Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

Faisal, Thank you especially for the response that the network-aware CC readers (should) encrypt their traffic. I was having difficulty finding non-ambiguous information about that. I'm still looking at options for possible lightweight VPN solutions, whether to add another layer of security to t

Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

Hi Ben, You can slice this in as many ways as you like... However if you want to keep it simple and effective... Here is the rundown If they are using the correct processor, who is able to do these transactions over IP / via the Internet, then you don't have to worry about any of this..

Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

MikroTik RB750's at the client and maybe a RB493 at the head end? Instant VPN tunnel. - Jerry From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ben West Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:31 AM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question about ho

Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

network aware CC terminals do not encrypt their own traffic? On 4/13/11 1:30 PM, Ben West wrote: Thanks everyone for your responses re: serving clients' credit card readers; they were very helpful. A related question I asked on another listserv: does anyone use lightweight VPN solutions in th

Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

Thanks everyone for your responses re: serving clients' credit card readers; they were very helpful. A related question I asked on another listserv: does anyone use lightweight VPN solutions in their CPE to create tunnels from the client's location, thru your backhaul, back to your wired/fibered u

Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

ss-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Ben West Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 7:15 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing I am curious if anyone has experience providing wireless service to sm

Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

I have at least one that got the connection specifically for the POS. No questions about how delivered. POS devices are on the store-wide LAN. I would suspect I have others that do POS that I don't know about. And lots of places use HughesNet, etc. How would we be any worse? On 4/11/2011 8:14

Re: [WISPA] Question about QMailToaster and Powercode

I don't know about Powercode, but Wispmon can ;). In all truthfullness, toaster is easy to script and should be easy to do with anything that can run scripts through ssh or cgi. I've done it both ways using perl scripts on the qmt box. Cameron On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr <

[WISPA] Question about QMailToaster and Powercode

Anyone know if there is a way to integrate qmailtoaster into powercode so that email accounts can be managed from within PC? Also is there a way to allow users to add their own accounts into QMT without having to call us. Thanks in advance Patrick Nix, Jr., Computer Network Solutions CSWEB

Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

pa.org Subject: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing I am curious if anyone has experience providing wireless service to small businesses who use a POS credit card system. My own chats with various small biz owners here in St. Louis suggests

Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

Also keep in mind that most transactions done with these machines over POTS are unencrypted. So don't try to plug one into a VoIP ATA. On 4/11/2011 20:20, Josh Luthman wrote: All of my customers are through wireless medium. There are a handful with the credit card processing machines you see

Re: [WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

All of my customers are through wireless medium. There are a handful with the credit card processing machines you see everywhere (the blue thin ones). No complaints. 90% of these units have a 10baseT (that's ten not one hundred) Ethernet port. I have seen a couple that DO NOT have an Ethernet p

[WISPA] Question about hosting client's POS merchant account for credit card processing

I am curious if anyone has experience providing wireless service to small businesses who use a POS credit card system. My own chats with various small biz owners here in St. Louis suggests that their merchant account providers tend to expect a twisted-pair phone line and/or dedicated DSL/cable, no

Re: [WISPA] Question about FCC Form 499-A Telecommunications Reporting Work Sheet.

Thanks, I will give Stephen a call. From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hogg Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:47 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question about FCC Form 499-A Telecommunications Reporting Work Sheet

Re: [WISPA] Question about FCC Form 499-A Telecommunications Reporting Work Sheet.

Stephen Coran a WISPA member is also someone to use. Regards, Chuck On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Ours... > > From: "Law Offices of Thomas K. Crowe" > Date: Nov 30, 2010 6:10 PM > Subject: LEGAL ALERT; Important FCC Deadlines > To: "Clients & Interested Parties" > > L

Re: [WISPA] Question about FCC Form 499-A Telecommunications Reporting Work Sheet.

Ours... From: "Law Offices of Thomas K. Crowe" Date: Nov 30, 2010 6:10 PM Subject: LEGAL ALERT; Important FCC Deadlines To: "Clients & Interested Parties" LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS K. CROWE, P.C. LEGAL ALERT Clients and Interested Parties: The information below represents a non-exhaustive li

[WISPA] Question about FCC Form 499-A Telecommunications Reporting Work Sheet.

Trying to fill out the application to get our FCC 499 Filer ID Number and one of the sections is for "DC Agent for Service Process". I've done a little research and made a few phone calls and from what I understand I must hire a Law firm in Washington DC that the FCC will contact me through if ne

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

In our area, there are a good number of used towers installed. This could be a used tower that came from an area where it needed painting and lighting. Obviously lights are a lot easier to remove than paint. Many municipal towers are hand-me-down used towers from war surplus, all installed befo

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

he appurtenance and be within 40 > > feet (12m) of the tip to allow the pilot an unobstructed > > view of at least one beacon. > > > > > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org > [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] > *On Behalf Of *Brian Webster > *Se

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

ance and be within 40 feet (12m) of the tip to allow the pilot an unobstructed view of at least one beacon. *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Brian Webster *Sent:* Friday, December 03, 2010 12:43 PM *To:* 'WISPA General List' *Su

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

, 2010 11:45 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower I'm not surprised but what I find interesting is this: How does a few feet make a difference to a helicopter or airplane? Why would you be that close to a tower either way? On Fri, Dec

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

od > aosg...@streamline-solutions.net > http://www.streamline-solutions.net > > Introducing Efficiency to Business since 1986. > > > > *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On > Behalf Of *RickG > *Sent:* Friday, December 03, 2010 11:45 AM > *To

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

Of RickG Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 11:45 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower I'm not surprised but what I find interesting is this: How does a few feet make a difference to a helicopter or airplane? Why would you be that close to a

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

I'm not surprised but what I find interesting is this: How does a few feet make a difference to a helicopter or airplane? Why would you be that close to a tower either way? On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Cameron Crum wrote: > My first job out of college was working as an RF engineer for Sprint

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

My first job out of college was working as an RF engineer for Sprint Cellular. One of the joyful tasks I had to do as a very junior engineer was audit FCC and FAA filings for about 500 cell sites along the eastern seaboard. The regulations then, and I believe still, are that nothing is supposed to

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

If you cant then every government emergency service agency around here is in trouble! On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > I know you can mount above it. Tons of towers around here do. > On Dec 2, 2010 9:24 PM, "Christopher Hair" wrote: > > At what height must a beacon light be

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

eneral List Subject: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] Question about beacon lights rules on a tower

I know you can mount above it. Tons of towers around here do. On Dec 2, 2010 9:24 PM, "Christopher Hair" wrote: > At what height must a beacon light be placed on a tower. Can anything be > mounted above the beacon light? Or must the beacon be at the highest point > on the tower? I have done sever

Re: [WISPA] Question #1 of the Day

I'm with you, pal. Bob- -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 10:51 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question #1 of the Day I'm not sure if it's

Re: [WISPA] Question #1 of the Day

Well to help stabilize our environment from an RF stand point, about 4 1/2 years ago eight providers in our area (we being one of them) whose coverage either bordered on each other or overlapped a bit got together and formed a co-op. We agreed not to build towers in each other's existing coverage f

Re: [WISPA] Question #1 of the Day

passing a law that unfairly benefits one company over another or giving money to one company at the expense of another. shrug Hope that helped at least a little bit :-) marlon - Original Message - From: "Rick Harnish" To: ; "'WISPA General List'"

[WISPA] Question #1 of the Day

Since rural broadband can be a tough proposition sometimes in terms of making a profit, businesses that serve these areas may require some creative thinking and partnerships. WISPs often partner with municipalities to obtain an anchor tenant and get a break on site rentals. Are there other interest

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

If selling to an investor, you need to take in average returns. They can get 5% risk-free from a bank, 10% from a low-risk fund, and 15% from a high-risk fund (numbers for purposes of our discussion only; they bear little resemblance to the present reality). If this is the case, then your typic

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

t. >> >> Tom DeReggi >> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc >> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "3-dB Networks" >> To: "'WISPA General List'" >> Sent: Friday, July 17,

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

the street that buyer would have to obtain to manage it. > > Tom DeReggi > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc > IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband > > > - Original Message ----- > From: "3-dB Networks" > To: "'WISPA General List'" > Sen

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

Interesting perspective, Matt. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: "Matt Liotta" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 5:42 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale >

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

--- Original Message - From: "Josh Luthman" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 12:27 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale > One way I have heard it done: > > Take the annual gross revenue, times it by 3 (three years gross revenue

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

he > additional grants that are enabled because your infrastructure helps > qualify > it. > > Tom DeReggi > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc > IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband > > > - Original Message - > From: "Patrick D. Nix, Jr" > To: > Sent: Frida

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

roll of techs > on the street that buyer would have to obtain to manage it. > > Tom DeReggi > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc > IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband > > > - Original Message ----- > From: "3-dB Networks" > To: "'WISPA General List

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:36 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale > Yeah don't expect over 2x annual revenue right now. 1x might be more > realistic. depending on the network and what a new operator would have to > do > to bring it into theirs, etc. > >

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

. Because then your value might be higher based on the additional grants that are enabled because your infrastructure helps qualify it. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: "Patrick D. Nix, Jr" To: Sent: Friday

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

(607) 435-3988 Mobile (208) 692-1898 Fax www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com> -Original Message- From: Charles Wyble [mailto:char...@thewybles.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:03 PM To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Quest

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 1:30 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale I have heard .5-2 times annual many times on this list Josh Luthman wrote: One way I have heard it done: Take the annual gross re

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

; From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Charles Wyble > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:03 PM > To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com; WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale > > ROFL ... NTIA got you all tied up ? :) &g

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

ype of work :-) But not until > after August 14th. > > > > Thank You, > Brian Webster > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on > Behalf Of Patrick D. Nix, Jr > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:21 PM

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

Revenue matters a lot less now. Earnings-based deals are what are being done now. Of course, many WISPs are spending all of their earnings on CAPEX. This is where capitalized leases play such a critical role. -Matt On Jul 17, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Travis Johnson wrote: > 3x gross annual was a

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

after August 14th. > > > > Thank You, > Brian Webster > > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on > Behalf Of Patrick D. Nix, Jr > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:21 PM > To: wireless@wispa.org

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

3x gross annual was a very nice number... but not realistic any longer. 1.5x is the last number I heard for an actual sale that went through. Travis Josh Luthman wrote: One way I have heard it done: Take the annual gross revenue, times it by 3 (three years gross revenue) and that's the

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on Behalf Of Patrick D. Nix, Jr Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 3:21 PM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale I apologize as I know this has been discussed on the list before. We are entertaining the idea

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

I have heard .5-2 times annual many times on this list Josh Luthman wrote: One way I have heard it done: Take the annual gross revenue, times it by 3 (three years gross revenue) and that's the buy out cost starting point. Seen this more so with telecom (voice) then data services,

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

I also wanted to throw this in.. If the owner does not have the resources to operate and maintain the customers (there for the revenue) then one can offer the price it would cost for that owner to remove the equipment from the towers (where leasing) and sell the towers and cut their losses. Or ju

Re: [WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

One way I have heard it done: Take the annual gross revenue, times it by 3 (three years gross revenue) and that's the buy out cost starting point. Seen this more so with telecom (voice) then data services, but it's a place to start. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Way

[WISPA] Question re: WISP for sale

I apologize as I know this has been discussed on the list before. We are entertaining the idea of selling out of our respectable size wireless ISP business in eastern Oklahoma. We have about 500 (growing daily) subscribers. Anyway, we are working on determining the net worth of the business. An

Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik

---Original Message- > From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com] > Sent: 18 April 2009 15:45 > To: WISPA General List > Subject: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik > > List > > Im running 3.15 on our Core Router to our upstream, I have 3 circuits > running

Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik

ubject: Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik A quick check looks like you have your own ASN, have one upstream peer (Sprint) and are advertising IPs reassigned to you from Sprint. Is that correct? You should be able to setup a BGP session between you and your new client and simply pass on any

Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik

fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 6:21 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik Make sure your MT router has at least 512MB

Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik

Make sure your MT router has at least 512MB of RAM (1GB preferred) and tell your upstreams to start sending full routes. That's it. Travis Microserv Gino Villarini wrote: > List > > Im running 3.15 on our Core Router to our upstream, I have 3 circuits > running BGP to the same provider. Im on

Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik

rini Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 11:50 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik Ill add that the isp has its own AS # Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message---

Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik

, 2009 11:51 AM To: wireless Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik Lots of memory. Do you redistribute the partial routes into your igp? -Original Message- From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com] Sent: 18 April 2009 15:45 To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Question

Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik

787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 11:51 AM To: wireless Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik Lots of memory. Do you redistribute

Re: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik

Lots of memory. Do you redistribute the partial routes into your igp? -Original Message- From: Gino Villarini [mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com] Sent: 18 April 2009 15:45 To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik List Im running 3.15 on our Core Router to our

[WISPA] Question about BGP + Mikrotik

List Im running 3.15 on our Core Router to our upstream, I have 3 circuits running BGP to the same provider. Im only receving rartial routes. All is well We just sold a circuit to anothe ISP, thy want full bGP support. I assume we must change to full routes, any tips on the changes needed?

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:20 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema >I want to you use Freeside badly for a while now, but the Billing > Manager is nervous transferring data? Does anybody know if you can

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

Sweet, baby steps. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jory Privett Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:49 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema Yes you can Jory Privett WCCS - Original Message

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

Yes you can Jory Privett WCCS - Original Message - From: "Cameron Kilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:20 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema >I want to you use Freeside badly for

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:58 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema Freeside is the new interface. I only use Mikrotik devices (including CPE, which are the customer's router). -- Mike Hammett Intell

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

#x27;WISPA General List'" Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 7:41 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema > What are you using for web interface. We are using radius for our PPPoE. > One of the problems we have noticed with PPPoE using MikroTik to pass > the data to

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "David E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:16 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema > Mike Hammett wrote: > > [ on the benefits of PPPoE ] >> It has sim

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

rk needs to hear. I bill for time spent fixing my customers home networks. ryan -Original Message- From: Mark Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:43 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema We have always given a public IP a

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

k Nash UnwiredWest 78 Centennial Loop Suite E Eugene, OR 97401 541-998- 541-998-5599 fax http://www.unwiredwest.com - Original Message - From: "Cameron Kilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:31 AM Subj

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

Mike Hammett wrote: [ on the benefits of PPPoE ] > It has similar ease of address distribution as DHCP, but also carries rate > limiting information as well. I'm switching to having the PPPoE backed by > RADIUS, so my new management system will be a web interface where I can > change anything

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

struggle as well as Apple Airports. -Cameron Midcoast Internet -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:30 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema It has similar ease of

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

ED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:18 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema >> PPPoE > > Y'know, I've never understood why many ISPs are so fond of PPPOE. The only > benefits anyone has ever articulated to me are an

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

address. Cameron Midcoast Internet -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2 Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:40 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema If you have ever renumbered your entire

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

;Patrick Nix Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:19 PM Subject: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema > Just curious to NAT or not to NAT, > > > > We have been operating with NATed addresses out to our customers on a > 10.x.x.x private network,

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

numbered your entire network due to changing upstream > providers or running out of IP, you will wish you had used DHCP everywhere. > - Original Message - > From: Travis Johnson > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA General List > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:37 PM

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

Travis Johnson wrote: > And to take it one step further, I've never understood using DHCP for > customers. It makes it 10x easier for a rogue client to get on your > network if you run DHCP instead of just static. You don't have to > maintain any logs, or worry about your DHCP server having prob

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Belton Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:04 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema I think it's fair to say that any ISP of size has in fact done this once if not twice. It's n

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

14, 2008 10:40 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema If you have ever renumbered your entire network due to changing upstream providers or running out of IP, you will wish you had used DHCP everywhere. - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson To

Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema

Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema And to take it one step further, I've never understood using DHCP for customers. It makes it 10x easier for a rogue client to get on your network if you run DHCP instead of just static. You don't have to maintain any logs, or worry

  1   2   >