Saturday, November 03, 2012 8:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
> Exactly my point. It doesn't make sense that someone representing
> Dragonwave would state this is a $5k repair, not saying it didn't happen,
> just saying it doesn't make sense to me. Even Dr
You got off cheap! Trango charged me $5000 to tell me we fried the
replacement ODU unit they sent while repairing our IDU for a "coffee"
spill. (Housed in a rack in our data center 10 ft in the air.)
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://l
Scott Carullo
Technical Operations
855-FLSPEED x102
From: "John Seaman"
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:19 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
Hi all, I'll chime in here to clarify the point regarding TX Power.
Trango offers high powe
ireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 9:02 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
Hell, other vendors that have been in teh sapce a long time are just over that
for the entire link (including dishe
: Friday, November 2, 2012 1:20:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
Yikes,
That doesn’t sound good from DragonWave’s perspective. At $5k, that is nearly
the cost for the entire radio path, (not counting antennas, PONE, etc) Can’t
imagine why they would charge such a price. Were you w
do most of our DragonWave purchasing through
Tessco.
Kevin
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Kevin Sullivan
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:12 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
We've used a few Trango, no SAF, an
. I'd put
them up like hotcakes if we could do 250mbps for $5k, installed. But, then, so
would everyone else.
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Owen
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
At First Step
John Seaman
Trango Systems, Inc.
858-248-4006
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
I beg to differ, they have
HI,
I have spoken to several other WISP's and when they actually compare the
SAME radio from SAF to Trango (same power, same license keys, same
dishes, etc.) then Trango is 99% of the time less expensive. Yes, it
only has a 2 year warranty compared to 5 years, but that's the only
difference.
I've had to do an RMA with SAF due to a Lightning Event. Unfortunately,
the radio has to go to Latvia for repairs. The turn around was about 2
weeks. I have also done an advanced replacement RMA that took 2 days.
Now, we buy extra units instead of advanced replacement.
Regards,
Chuck
On Fri,
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:49 AM
To: can...@believewireless.net; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
Why are you doing all new links with SAF is the question being asked here
I'd rather the radio just stay working...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> When I have priced them before, SAF was the same price as Trango with
> their "standard power"... bu
That is where I am as well. Just stay working is the reason I am moving
my most important ptp links to licensed. I have done the Ubnt and
Mikrotik thing for backhauls and am sick of it. I want reliability,
thus licensed. Thanks for all the great info. It is helping greatly.
For those that
When I have priced them before, SAF was the same price as Trango with
their "standard power"... but when you increase to High Power then it's
more expensive.
And SAF's 5 year warranty is very cool... the bigger question with this
type of radio is how quickly can they repair/replace the unit? I
I don't understand, SAF has a standard power version and a high power
version. Cost difference isn't much.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
I don't really care about weight either (though that does tend to show a
better product in ATX power supplies).
I am concerned about the wattage consumption and price.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:00 AM,
I'm curious about that as well... I know "weight" is a big thing for
Gino due to shipping... but I'm not sure I would be willing to give up
the higher output and better receive levels for a couple extra pounds.
Travis
On 11/2/2012 7:49 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Why are you doing all new links wi
-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 9:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
Feature key is NOT required on Trango for more power. All the radios are at
full power regardless of the license key.
Travis
On 11/2/2012 6:53 AM
ss-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Bill Gaylord
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 8:20 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
>
> Can anyone help me out? We are in the process of deciding which company to
> use for 6 licensed links. Both are similar in pr
We have installed over 40 of the Trango links (in our network and for
other companies). We install long links (some 18ghz links as far as 32
miles), so the higher power output and better receive is a big plus for us.
Travis
Microserv
On 11/2/2012 6:20 AM, Bill Gaylord wrote:
> Can anyone help m
, November 02, 2012 8:20 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] SAF vs Trango
Can anyone help me out? We are in the process of deciding which company to use
for 6 licensed links. Both are similar in price/performance.
Trango has more tx power and rx sensitivity, thus their antennas are
I have 3 SAF links...operating just fine. I know of others that have a lot
of Trango links...operating just fine. I don't think you could go wrong
with either one.
Regards,
Chuck
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Bill Gaylord wrote:
> Can anyone help me out? We are in the process of deciding
All things equal, SAF has a 5 year warranty and fantastic tech
support. We have both Trango and SAF in our network and now all new
links are SAF exclusively.
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Can anyone help me out? We are in the process of deciding which company
to use for 6 licensed links. Both are similar in price/performance.
Trango has more tx power and rx sensitivity, thus their antennas are
smaller, which is a plus. I would like to know if anyone has any
experiences with
24 matches
Mail list logo
