At 11/18/2010 02:07 AM, Tom Reggi wrote:
OOps. looks like the HTML tables were lost in transmission.
To translate no channels were available. except for 4 of if at 40mw..
Would channels have been available if you were below the 75 meter limit?
I'm seriously thinking of writing a Petition f
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV whitespaces - M$ contributes
WOW you are lucky Checkout my availabilty, in the one area I was hoping
to have atleast one channel, which is an agricultural reserve full of tall
trees
Available Channels
Fixed
per band channels be any better than 4watt 900mhz?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV whitespac
According to that page, only 2, 5, and 6 are available for me. Assuming
their data is correct, TVWS are almost not even worth my time.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/25/2010 12:14 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> 8 Channels around here for me...
>
> http
;> issue. We need to discuss it more and help it mature, it is definitely
>> worthwhile to pursue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rick
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>>> Behalf Of John Sc
> worthwhile to pursue.
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of John Scrivner
>> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 11:40 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>>
spa.org] On
> Behalf Of John Scrivner
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 11:40 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV whitespaces - Whats the next step
>
> There is no "staking your claim". I pushed for that as part of a
> spectrum homesteading initiative
On 09/27/2010 08:40 AM, John Scrivner wrote:
> There is no "staking your claim". I pushed for that as part of a
> spectrum homesteading initiative which WISPA will not support...sadly.
Well isn't this what whitespaces is supposed to prevent? Large amounts
of exclusive spectrum already exists an
There is no "staking your claim". I pushed for that as part of a
spectrum homesteading initiative which WISPA will not support...sadly.
We probably had a good shot at it through all the lobbying efforts we
did but the FCC Committee had people against the idea that building
broadband service should
At 9/27/2010 10:54 AM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
> OK so in my area there is a three channel space of 26,27 and, 28
>available. I guess my goal is to camp out on 27, knowing this how to I
>stake the claim and start working toward deployment? I know it's
>oversimplified but that's where I have to star
OK so in my area there is a three channel space of 26,27 and, 28
available. I guess my goal is to camp out on 27, knowing this how to I
stake the claim and start working toward deployment? I know it's
oversimplified but that's where I have to start.
Forbes
On 9/25/2010 8:37 PM, Mike Hammet
According to that website channels 5-13 and a couple others, that are
only 2 channels wide, are available here, but unless the local TV
channels completely changed on the DTV switch 5 and 9 are in use.
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> According to that page, only 2, 5, and
According to that page, only 2, 5, and 6 are available for me.
Assuming their data is correct, TVWS are almost not even worth my time.
6 channels are reserved for wireless mics.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/25/2010 12:14 PM, Josh Luthman wr
According to that page, only 2, 5, and 6 are available for me.
Assuming their data is correct, TVWS are almost not even worth my time.
6 channels are reserved for wireless mics.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/25/2010 12:14 PM, Josh Luthman wr
8 Channels around here for me...
http://www.spectrumbridge.com/products-services/whitespaces/showmywhitespace/single-location-search.aspx
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
> Th
That was where my question was going. 12mhz could let you use a 10mhz
channel. Yes we are used to half duplex because that is what most
people make. I would love full duplex and with all the mimo gear it
just my be possible to do it at a end user acceptable rate.
Most of the area I am interested i
You have to hit show incumbents. If you just hit enter after putting
in an address it doesn't show anything. The submit action appears to be
the find address button which just finds you on the map.
On 9/25/2010 1:52 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> I go to it and it seems there are no available cha
-Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 5:26 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV whitespaces - M$ contributes
>
> Ah much better. Now, if
That's another thing to remember... to have any usable throughput
you're going to have to find several channels together.
With UBNT gear, 6 MHz only yields 15 megabits. MT's N might double that.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/25/2010 4:25 AM,
ginal Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 5:26 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV whitespaces - M$ contributes
Ah much better. Now, if a town has say 4 channels open (in a row) l
Ah much better. Now, if a town has say 4 channels open (in a row) like
2 3 4 5, can you use 3 and 4, keeping 2 and 5 as the guard channels?
or will you need to pick 3 or 4?
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
> It is broke. Use http://www.spectrumbridge.com instead.
>
>
>
> Josh
It is broke. Use http://www.spectrumbridge.com instead.
Josh Luthman wrote:
I go to it and it seems there are no available channels anywhere I
search. Maybe they're working on it? Maybe I'm doing something
wrong?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Sui
I go to it and it seems there are no available channels anywhere I
search. Maybe they're working on it? Maybe I'm doing something
wrong?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
> Am
Am I the only one its not working for? I get script errors like
'Server Error in '/WSWebGUI' Application.' (and more info snipped).
Scripts are turned on in FireFox on Linux and Windows, and IE does not
have any changes from default (it is never used). Clicking on channels
jumps it to the default v
looks awfully similar to what is on Spectrum Bridge's web site...
:)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, Fl 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Helpdesk: 305 663 5518 option 2 Email: supp...@snappydsl.net
On 9/24/2010 6:48 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
>http://whitespaces
he code that says you can use the same "type"
> of lower gain.
> And no one at the FCC will stick their neck out far enough to say which one
> trumps the other.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "
"
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
>I don't see how what I said was any different than what Blair said, nor how
> what Blair said was any indication of using something that wouldn't be
> approved.
>
> If the rules
;Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 12:09 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> Sorry Mike. I try to limit my time to responding only to serious,
> thoughtful comments. I don't normally respond to smart-a** co
see Antenna Requirements on page 101. Fixed device transmit antenna
limited to MAX 30 meters high, also the receive antenna must be MIN 10
meter high.
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:48 AM, Jack Unger wrote:
> I don't think Fresnel is going to be too much of a problem. Which page
> did you pick up that a
> From: "Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:43 PM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
>
>> They did state that they plan to take another look at this
Butch,
Your analysis looks good. I'm still reading through the rules and I WILL
be commenting just as soon as I get through it all. :)
I don't think Fresnel is going to be too much of a problem. Which page
did you pick up that antenna height requirement from?
jack
Butch Evans wrote:
> On Wed
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Jack Unger wrote:
>Sorry Mike. I try to limit my time to responding only to serious,
>thoughtful comments. I don't normally respond to smart-a** comments
>because I just don't have any time to waste on them.
Ouch! :-)
Has anyone done an RF propagation study in your area f
t; -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> --
> From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 9:12 PM
> To: "WISPA General Li
com>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Joe Laura
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
Unless I am looking at it wrong it looks like New Orleans has 10 channels
that I can use. This is go
ttp://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 9:12 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> Thanks! Something similar (maybe a little more selective and a little
>
ovember 19, 2008 3:43 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> They did state that they plan to take another look at this band in 5
> years.
>
> Marlon
> (509) 982-2181
> (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
> 42
: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> Joe,
>
> The White Spaces are the unused television channels. In most major metro
> areas, many of the channels are in use by television broadcasters and
> other lic
McCown - 3 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> For adjacent channel use, we don't have to use a 6 MHz channel. We could
>>>>> use 5 or 4 or whatever it takes to make it work.
>>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>&
hannel use, we don't have to use a 6 MHz channel. We could
use 5 or 4 or whatever it takes to make it work.
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:
to make it work.
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
Directional antennas and other interference-av
.
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "WISPA General List"
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:32 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
>>>
>>>
>>
x27;t have to use a 6 MHz channel. We could
use 5 or 4 or whatever it takes to make it work.
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
use, we don't have to use a 6 MHz channel. We could
> use 5 or 4 or whatever it takes to make it work.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Wednesday, November
For adjacent channel use, we don't have to use a 6 MHz channel. We could
use 5 or 4 or whatever it takes to make it work.
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:32 PM
Subj
EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> Direction
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> Perhaps once TVWS gets used and it proves a success, then th
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
>
>
>
>> Anything's possible but look at the shape of a DTV waveform and compare
>> it to the shape of an OFDM broadband wireless signal.
Hopefully forward error correction and directional antennas will make it
possible.
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> Anythi
ed and it proves a success, then they will open up
> adjacent channels.
> Once they do that there will be holes everywhere.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Wednesday,
New Orleans? TIA
>> Joe Laura
>> Superior Alarm/Wireless
>> New Orleans,La.
>> www.superior1.com
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Blair Davis
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 5:47 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV W
Original Message -
> From: Blair Davis
> To: WISPA General List
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 5:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
>
>
> Ubquity? Some kind of mini-pci card?
>
> Charles Wyble wrote:
> Mike Hammett wrote:
> Now that TV white
: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul
Look at the BLONDER TONGUE BTY-10-U UHF single channel units
Third photo down on the left.
I'd look hard at these as CPE antennas...
Steve Barnes wrote:
That's scary. And that's
Wonder why it attached the reply...
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown - 3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] T
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Mac Dearman wrote:
>- -as I used Brains tool
Mac,
I'll believe a lot of things, but I don't believe that you used
"Brains" anything. ;-)
--
* Butch Evans * Professional Network Consul
Could you elaborate on why this is a bad idea?
I'm slightly interested in it for low cost connections. In my current
area, I don't have a problem finding grain legs for AP sites. These
would be dense enough that I could build a great network with white
spaces cells and 5GHz backhauls.
But
November 18, 2008 9:17 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
>
> Am I hearing correctly that this new space can only be utilized in
> rural areas? Not for Citys like New Orleans? TIA
> Joe Laura
> Superior Alarm/Wireless
> New Orleans,La.
> www.s
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul
For an idea of antenna size... look at a TV antenna. Same band, same
size
antenna for
day, November 17, 2008 9:45 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces PtP Backhaul
> Even in our area in eastern Indiana there is lots of 5.8 still available
> for PTP. 700 PTP is not necessary in my opinion.
>
> I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes.
.
Respectfully,
Rick Harnish
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Laura
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 10:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
Am I hearing correctly that this new space can only be utilized in
5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
Ubquity? Some kind of mini-pci card?
Charles Wyble wrote:
Mike Hammett wrote:
Now that TV whitespaces have been approved for our use, let's hear from the
vendors. When, how much, and what will you do with it?
Indeed!
Who woul
I've got territory ranging from a town of 35K to open wheat fields to
rolling to tall mountains heavily forested.
I can find no particular need for, and in fact, find that low frequency
backhauls are at least sometimes self-defeating, due to huge Fresnel zones,
for instance. What I need, in p
>
> I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes. Aren't sectors going to be
> huge to get the 4 watt at the antenna?
To be clear, TVWS is different than 700 MHz. The 700 MHz band sold at
auction. TVWS is lower in frequency which will mean even larger antennas for
equivalent gain. The physics of i
I don't recall the exact length but we have an enormous fiberglass 450
mhz omni on our tower. At least 12 ft and it withstood the hurricane
of Ohio with 60 mph winds a few months back.
On 11/17/08, Steve Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even in our area in eastern Indiana there is lots of 5.8
At these freqs, I'd suspect that yagi's will be the best choice for
cpe's.
Steve Barnes wrote:
Even in our area in eastern Indiana there is lots of 5.8 still available
for PTP. 700 PTP is not necessary in my opinion.
I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes. Aren't sectors going to b
Even in our area in eastern Indiana there is lots of 5.8 still available
for PTP. 700 PTP is not necessary in my opinion.
I am concerned about 700 Mhz antenna sizes. Aren't sectors going to be
huge to get the 4 watt at the antenna? I am also concerned about the
CPE Panel size. Going from a 15
We have been fighting it. Towerstream seems to have somehow created a
perception that they are justified in this desire to set aside TVWS spectrum
for this inefficient use. We have been fighting it and we will continue to
do so.
Scriv
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Ubquity? Some kind of mini-pci card?
Charles Wyble wrote:
Mike Hammett wrote:
Now that TV whitespaces have been approved for our use, let's hear from the vendors. When, how much, and what will you do with it?
Indeed!
Who would the likely vendors in this space be?
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 5:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
Ultimately, I imagine anyone that has a product we use now will be
there.
First? Ubiquiti, no doubt. They are very fast at developing products
and already have a
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Charles Wyble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:31 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> Mike Hammett wrot
nday, November 17, 2008 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
Mike Hammett wrote:
Now that TV whitespaces have been approved for our use, let's hear from
the vendors. When, how much, and what will you do with it?
Indeed!
Who would the likely
onths or
a year before anybody is shipping any quantity of anything.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wyble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> Mike Hammett wrote:
&g
Mike Hammett wrote:
> Now that TV whitespaces have been approved for our use, let's hear from the
> vendors. When, how much, and what will you do with it?
>
Indeed!
Who would the likely vendors in this space be?
Should we put an RFP together and send it around? I sure want answers
to your
neral List"
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> Everyone remember that I sent out a Google Earth file of what should be
> most
> of the digital TV footprint in America after February. That is subject to
> change of course but it's c
7;s hard to cover due
> to trees.
>
> Even my 900 stuff didn't go past 5 blocks in my testing.
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA Ge
5 blocks in my testing.
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] TV Whitespaces
> Everyone remember that I se
Daniel,
Comments inline...
> But I agree... 4 watts EIRP... 1 watt out of the radio.
Which is enough, for many Fixed applications.
> Fixed devices cannot use adjacent channels... but portable can at
> reduced EIRP (which I
> can't recall what that was).
Which is just about what WISPA asked
Everyone remember that I sent out a Google Earth file of what should be most
of the digital TV footprint in America after February. That is subject to
change of course but it's close. You would use that tool to find available
channels in your area. It works great because you can turn on the channel
Yep. I'm still reading too but so far it looks like we got 90% of what
we asked for. My reading continues...
3-dB Networks wrote:
> I'm about 30 pages in or so... and realized I should be taking notes... I
> hope to finish it in the next few days too.
>
> But I agree... 4 watts EIRP... 1 watt out
www.fcc.gov
Gino Villarini wrote:
> Link?
>
>
> Gino A. Villarini
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
> Sent: Monday, Nov
I'm about 30 pages in or so... and realized I should be taking notes... I
hope to finish it in the next few days too.
But I agree... 4 watts EIRP... 1 watt out of the radio. Fixed devices
cannot use adjacent channels... but portable can at reduced EIRP (which I
can't recall what that was).
Autom
Link?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 11:10 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject:
Mike
Right now it is in draft but very close to going to the next stage. But
there is a lot more going on here than just a standard.
- The 802.22 is setting a precedence, besides the engineers that are
creating 802.22 also involved are the incumbents that hold the TV channels
and they hav
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 17:32:02 -0800, Alan Cain wrote
> Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Over time, I have attempted to respond to a number of things, and I NEVER
find the page to do so. The FCC has one of the most obscure organizational
methods I have ever run into. I remember having to
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Good grief guys, there are only 12 new filings in the last week or
so!!
I don't have a cute secretary like Mary, Marlon.
**200738030387**
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wi
ot;
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tv whitespaces dates! WOW
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
H,
We need to work on this. We want to oppose the personal portable devices
at this time.
We don't want to see a bunch of linksys type routers with 2 mile
ranges!!
ot;WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tv whitespaces dates! WOW
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
H,
We need to work on this. We want to oppose the personal portable devices
at this time.
We don't want to see a bunch of linksys type router
Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
H,
We need to work on this. We want to oppose the personal portable
devices at this time.
We don't want to see a bunch of linksys type routers with 2 mile ranges
Any ideas on how to go about it?
marlon
Marlon
Can you explain the strategy of opposing perso
Hammers???
>-Original Message-
>From: Marlon K. Schafer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 02:00 AM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] tv whitespaces dates! WOW
>
>H,
>
>We need to work on this. We want to op
what did you say?
- Original Message -
From: "Mac Dearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 6:10 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] tv whitespaces dates! WOW
I sent Senator Sununu an email last night :-)
I sent Senator Sununu an email last night :-)
Mac Dearman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 1:01 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] tv whitespaces dates! WOW
H,
We need
IL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:25 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] tv whitespaces dates! WOW
Could this be true or am I dreaming? Pinch me please
http://www.tvtechnology.com/pages/s.0014/t.2200.html
Mac Dearman
-Original Message---
: RE: [WISPA] tv whitespaces filings
Precision Data Solutions, LLC
2007226668971
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Renner
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 3:26 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] tv whitespac
Precision Data Solutions, LLC
2007226668971
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Renner
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 3:26 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] tv whitespaces filings
NetsurfUSA filled - 2007223533
Portative filed. : **2007225097486**
David Hulsebus
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
> Good grief guys, there are only 12 new filings in the last week or
> so!!
>
> Why, in the name of God, would the FCC give a rats behind about our
> industry if we can't be bothered to talk to
2007225610045
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Filing complete. '2007225311218
Although, I avoided proposed rules details, as it was already well
expressed by other WISPA filers.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
Filing complete. '2007225311218
Although, I avoided proposed rules details, as it was already well expressed
by other WISPA filers.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181" <[EMAIL PROTECT
We too have filed a comment with the FCC and while we agreed with WISPA's
stand and used 95 percent of Marlon's work, we also personalized some of the
comments to make them specific to Loudoun County's needs, demographics,
typography and population. Just cutting and pasting is fine, I guess, but
Short but sweet ;)
Your Confirmation Number is: '2007224246238 '
-RickG
On 2/23/07, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good grief guys, there are only 12 new filings in the last week or so!!
Why, in the name of God, would the FCC give a rats behind about our industr
I filed, 2007224308481
Mark McElvy
AccuBak Data Systems, Inc.
573.729.9200 - Office
573.729.9203 - Fax
573.247.9980 - Mobile
http://www.accubak.com/
http://www.accubak.net/
Nationwide Internet Access
Accurate backups for your critical data!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma
I have filed too!
Martha Huizenga
DC Access
Cliff Leboeuf wrote:
Done too!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Renner
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:26 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] tv whitespac
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
