Kay Smoljak wrote:
There's a number of different screenreaders available for testing.
Here's some others:
Window-Eyes (demo version): http://www.gwmicro.com/demo/index.php
Simply Web 2000 (free): http://www.econointl.com/sw/
JAWS (demo version):
http://www.freedomscientific.com/fs_products/softwar
Ben Curtis wrote:
A lot of people put an in-page anchor at the top to "skip navigation"
or "skip to main content." Are there any hidden gotchas with simply
putting the navigation last and positioning it first?
With all the discussion about whether content or navigation first is
better for the b
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Veine K Vikberg wrote:
So it's not WAI that's unforgiving, but Bobby in its miopic
application of the guidelines (which are, at this stage, already quite
out of date in many areas such as the one discussed here).
There is really a quite simple solution, which is what you s
Paul Novitski wrote:
You can find an excellent introduction to scripting events on
Peter-Paul Koch's http://www.quirksmode.org/
Another excellant resource is Unobtrusive Javascript
(http://www.onlinetools.org/articles/unobtrusivejavascript/)
**
Patrick Lauke wrote:
...and discussing the finer points of semantics in a markup language as coarse
and unsuitable as HTML ends up being a tad futile
Futile? Perhaps sometimes. Though I must admit, when there is a good
reason to do so (what's a "good reason" is admittedly subjective) I find
spli
Kevin Futter wrote:
"Less important" doesn't mean "not important."
Exactly, which is why I didn't say "not important" ...
...which is a reason why it is unlike a sentence. The words of a
sentence need their organization within the sentence to be useful.
You can slice it and dice it however y
Kevin Futter wrote:
I see breadcrumbs as a complete unit - just as a file path is a complete unit;
take out a component and you render it useless.
Breadcrumbs and sentences are both whole units, but units of what? Since
their component parts are of a different nature, the resulting mark-up
shoul
Rick Faaberg wrote:
If you leave any "nodes" out, you've lost your way.
That's because your missing information; however, each individual link
is unchanged.
Again, a word isn't very useful outside the context of a sentence,
however a link is just as useful.
--
No virus found in this outgoing me
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Mordechai, according to your explanation a breadcrumb is not a list, as you
cannot simply take any of the items out of a breadcrumb. Each item in a
breadcrumb is closely related to the preceeding item.
Except I also said "the order of an ordered list imparts
Kevin Futter wrote:
Yes, breadcrumb elements are strongly related in exactly the same way that
sentence elements (i.e. words) are; and sentences can be rendered with
precise meaning even if some words are omitted (prepositions, conjunctions,
most adverbs, many adjectives).
Not at all in the same wa
Genau Junior wrote:
The problem is that even thought i put the ampersands, the code isn´t
validate, becouse the generator of advert, generates dinmic url ´s,
whithout my control.
Can anyone help me how i can fix this problem and validate my code
using ampersands generated by advertpro?
Besides
Kevin Futter wrote:
I don't buy the argument that breadcrumbs *have to be* structured as lists.
Why? Because they're not a collection of loosely-related list items, like a
shopping list or such; rather, a unit of breadcrumbs collectively delineates
a *path* to a resource (without resorting to conve
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
3 pieces of information per item, so a table is probably the most
appropriate way of marking this up.
While in theory you are probably right, practically speaking, a list is
easier to style.
For example:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
http://www.w3.
Richard Spence wrote:
In my opinion a simple string of would work just fine. The
information that you are trying to display is not really a list.
I strongly disagree. Breadcrumbs are most definitely a list of links;
they're even normally represented as a horizontal list. A list,
according to "
Marilyn Langfeld wrote:
What I've read is that large companies/institutions that still use
Windows NT 4 also use NN4. That seems to be the problem, and these
large installations don't want to update since they have fewer virus,
worm, adware, etc. problems. The old "if it's not broke, don't fix i
Cb2 Web Design wrote:
I have a doubt: Is it correct to use fieldset (and legend) without a
form, like you can see at the page below?
http://www.euroaccessibility.org/tf3_doc/EACTF3TestableStatements.html
Surprisingly, the W3C's validator doesn't pick it up, however, the page
has so many well-form
Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
If you wish to use absolute sizes it is fairly acceptable so long as
you supply an alternate style, however the best option is relative size.
I tend to disagree, as do all the accessibility experts and guidelines
of which I'm aware. From my own personal experience, most
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
template that is fixed and centred as in - i.e. one that will resize
properly to 800x600 resolution.
Which is it, fixed or fluid (resizes)?
Does anyone know where I can find a decent 4 column css template to use?
You might find something at http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Chris Stratford wrote:
http://inspiro.neester.com/
Click on ABOUT.
In IE the content panel seems to overlap the whole nav panel too...
I checked out http://inspiro.neester.com/about-us.html in IE6 and it
looked OK at first glance, but I found a major flaw when I tried to
resize the font: you spe
Ted Drake wrote:
Is there anyone out there that has had some success building a style sheet to make their web site look good on a pocket pc or cell phone? I'd like to add this feature to our site but I haven't had much luck.
A recent article at ALA talked about it.
(http://alistapart.com/articl
Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
20
So and constitute data.
20 - somehow describes the very same data that is: and .
While, yes, 20 can be said to describe "price", it is more accurate to
say that "price" and "EUR" describes 20.
**
The discussion lis
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
It's perfectly valid (even up to XHTML 1.1)!
If you use of instead of , it's valid even in XHTML2.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hi
Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
And if XML is data,what is inside XML tags?
Anyway, this is waaay off-toppic.
A discription of the data.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for s
What's in a name? Read this and find out:
http://computerworld.com/departments/opinions/sharktank/0,4885,97840,00.html
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
Nick Lo wrote:
During development when referring to HTML (and perhaps CSS) with a
client do you use the term "code" or the more pedantically correct,
though perhaps less recognised, term "markup" ?
My own preference is:
XHTML -- mark-up
CSS -- styling
JavaScript, PHP, etc... -- code
*
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
remember that the above is also true for other browsers if margin,
padding
and border are anything but zero (in the correct box model)
In Firefox, last I checked, 5x(1%+18%+1%) will equal 100%, so margins,
etc, aren't a problem if you account for them.
greg harrington wrote:
Hi, this is the first time here so I hope i do thinks right. I have as
part of a student group written a website for the school i work at. I'm
using IE6 and the site displays images in 800 by 600 fine but in 1024 by
768 the image displays a bit to the left until i hit refresh
mike bailey wrote:
I am currently messing around, and writing a simple template, and was
wondering if there is a way to lineup 5 divs on a single line without
using the left and right css properties.
In other words, you don't want to use absolute positioning. How's about:
.fiveInRow {
float : l
russ - maxdesign wrote:
We are interested in getting your feedback about the Web Standards Group.
Your question on standards left out DOM. Unfortunately, I didn't realize
it until after I had finished.
**
The discussion list for http://websta
Peter Firminger wrote:
Is a list with one item really a list?
Yes absolutely. If there is one person in a room and you are asked to list
the names of the people in the room then the list will have one name.
Your example work because there's an unknown number. In cases where
there's only on
Chris Kennon wrote:
Should I use in-line xml and change the dtd? Or is this fast becoming
an RSS issue?
OK, RSS is also a standard, so it's still on topic.
Now let's say that you use XSLT to transform it into XHTML: What mark-up
should you use? This question basically brings us back to where thi
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Another interpretation (that I assumed when I first read M's post) is
that
it seems contrary to semantics to have date emphasised. If the em is only
used for visual styling, it should be replaced by pure styling markup
(such
as adding a class instead).
If something truly i
Peter Firminger wrote:
Definition lists are entirely appropriate for any name/value set and are quite different to other (ordered and unordered) lists. A div is far less semantically appropriate IMHO.
I tend to agree, though sometimes it seems like lists are becoming the
new tables.
Before a d
Sam Hutchinson wrote:
yeah it works on my slave machine running sp1, but I tend not to have that
connected, as it will just get eaten by the web (yours is still alive?).
Besides avoiding using IE, having a good firewall helps. Personally,
I've been happy with Sygate.
**
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
This will do:
That is: you need a clearer at the bottom to make Moz expand the
container and its background.
You can do it without any additional mark-up. See:
http://positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html
**
The di
Jonathan T. Sage wrote:
#Convert all the 's to ::ABBA:: (a rather unlikly string)
As I recall, ABBA the name of a popular band in the 70's
(http://www.abbasite.com/). Then again, there's also the American Bed
and Breakfast Association (http://www.abba.com/). Maybe you should use
&_br; since
Vicki Berry wrote:
Seems you have to sacrifice a browser or two whichever way you choose to go
There's no need to "sacrifice" a browser, just the effect in a browser.
(I suspect that's what you meant, but just in case...)
**
The discussion list f
Jonathan T. Sage wrote:
I was wondering if there is an easy way to tell the
browser to render just a section of the page in a HTML4 mode, to avoid
it bombing out.
You could use an object tag, but it would suffer from most of the
negatives of an iframe.
If you choose to have PHP parse the HTML, as
Mark Harwood wrote:
Now we have just run a SiteMore.com check on part of the development site and it
has come back kicking and screaming at us as we are using WIDTH and HEIGHT on
's and ALIGN on 's
It shouldn't be that difficult to write a small program to go through
the files and whenever it
Derek Featherstone wrote:
As for using onkeypress, if the "validators" (by which I assume you mean
Bobby, et al) then, they need to get a clue. The automated tool is only
there to help, not to be the final arbiter of what is and isn't accessible.
Another solution is not to use in-line JavaScript. U
Lawrence Carriere wrote:
Note the footer. I want it to be the same height and width and always on the
bottom (no matter how much content there is).
With CSS, it's simple: {position : fixed; bottom : 0;}
The problem is you-know-who doesn't support it. So you second choice is
JavaScript. IIRC, ALA h
Bert Doorn wrote:
It's also frustrating to get emails with microscopic text (accessibility
issue). Text/plain please?
Both Thunderbird and Firefox allow you to set the minimum font size.
Accessibility fighting back!
As far as your dilemma goes - don't lower your standards (pun intended) for
t
Natalie Buxton wrote:
While Web Standards and Accessibility are often practiced together,
they are not entirely the same speciallty.
While that's technically true, it's not a coincidence that those
interested in Standards are also interested in accessibility: the two
complements each other ver
As the only proper way to test to to actually run the software (screen
shots don't help much with JavaScript), and while any standards based
code which works properly in Firefox stands a good chance of also
working in Safari, IE, on the other hand (surprise, surprise) isn't
quite such a sure th
Ryan Nichols wrote:
It seems like as more and more companies adopt a forward thinking view
of web development, this skillset will be a hot commodity.
My hunch is that the door leading to mass adoption of Web standards will
be labeled "Accessibility". There have already been at least three cases
Andrew Thompson wrote:
I always pitch an ROI for CSS on a bandwidth
I've heard of a number of cases where the expected drop in bandwidth
didn't materialize...
...BECAUSE USAGE WENT UP TO COMPENSATE!!!
Now that's an ROI even the clueless can sink their teeth into!
*
Sam - SS29 wrote:
www.inisbua.co.uk/v2/index.php
A couple of quick problems I noticed:
1.
2. No character encoding. Ideally, this should be sent by the server,
but using a tag is also valid. An alternate method of having
the server send them is by having php set some of the headers.
I found t
Mary Krieger wrote:
- The point (pt) size tells the printer how big is the distance from
the top of the ascender to the bottom of the descender for that font.
- An em is equal to the height of the font being used ( or in other
words the point size). It is used to set the widths and height of
oth
Sam Hutchinson wrote:
The reason is that its IE ! Reason enough !
Would be hard to tell without looking at it directly.
Fair enough, though while we're at it, I'd also like to know how the
site looks on a Mac.
What the client saw:
http://testing.pellerweb.com/october/screenshot.gif
The html:
http
Jens Grochtdreis wrote:
Does your layout work with Conditional Comments?
Yes, in order to avoid hacks in my main style sheet.
If that's the case, you won#t recognize the correct layout in your
standalone IE5.5, because of the wrong CC-information it gets from the
installed IE6.
I'm aware of that,
After tweaking a layout to get it to look the same (not necessarily
pixel perfect, though) in Firefox, IE6, and IE5, the client reviews it
and tells me there is a problem in IE5.5. After seeing the screen shot
(I don't think I fully believed it before that), I looked for a possible
source. The
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Small modification: use popWindow(this.href) to refer back to the A
element's HREF attribute. This way, if you change the href at some
point, you won't have to remember to change the javascript as well, as
it will automatically pick it up...
I had forgotten about that tri
Chris Kennon wrote:
It doesn't keep page count down after thinking about it, can you
direct me to the correct solution you alluded to.
First and foremost, start with a plain link: http://other.domain.com/";>Someplace else.
Then, and only then, (if you must) assign to the node's onclick property
Bryan Garnett-Law wrote:
This is my code for indenting text after the first line
.indent { text-indent: -2em; margin: 0 2em;}
.indent:first-line { text-indent: 2em; }
I thought of using :first-line, too, as well as a combo of sibling and
child selectors, but in both cases you-know-who doesn't supp
Ben Stockdale wrote:
This is my first attempt at a full css layout and to my surprise it
seems to test ok on most browsers, apart from the later versions of IE
where some of the text hides underneath the floated image.
http://stockdale.id.au/ggg/
I haven't moved the css external yet whilst testing
Joshua Street wrote:
What's the recommended practice with indentation?
You can use CSS to indent text with padding and whatever else, but
that's a pain if you have a sitewide CSS file, and the text to be
indented doesn't sit in any defining container
Why doesn't it "sit in any defining container
Chris Kennon wrote:
I dread the use of JS pop up windows, but would like to keep the page
count down,
Besides being potentially inaccessible to those without JavaScript
(unless done correctly) or XP SP2, and annoying to those where it does
function (again, depending on how and where it's done)
Genau Junior wrote:
I would like to know, how is the max size of a .css file for a website...
30kb , for example, is a accetable css file size?
While I don't have a technical answer to your question, I suspect it
will vary from one browser to the next. From a practical standpoint,
however, if y
Adam Carmichael wrote:
I'm having some trouble with the (near idiot proof) 2 column
Floatutorial. I have a form I'm building at:
http://demo.home.carneeki.net
This behaviour is only apparent in IE.
The HTML and CSS have passed validation.
Since it's only "near idiot prof," and idiot can still b
Chris Stratford wrote:
It's a standard that
only members get :-)
Still not right.
Try:
.secret {display : none;}
It's a standard that only members get
:-)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.or
russ - maxdesign wrote:
You may have been thinking about CSS-Discuss where it came up recently:
And Webmasterworld:
Thanks Russ. It must have been the css-d thread since looking back I see
that I read it and since the Webmasterworld reference was my postI
guess I got the line height addition
Nick Lo wrote:
I was just reading the article excerpted below and was curious as to
how many on the list have used this technique of initially setting all
padding and margins to 0 and if so how successful was it?
I remember reading a similar suggestion a while back (I don't remember
where) whic
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Well, I tried recreating a simple document like the one you describe,
with missing ALT attribute on the image...but can't seem to reproduce
the slew of errors you're reporting. Any chance you can upload the
broken page so we can have a look if there's anything specific to
Let me start by saying that I have enough experience with syntax checker
to know that the error message doesn't always point to the right place
and that one error can generate many messages. But that being said, I
think this one takes the cake.
The DOCTYPE was set to XHTML 1.0 STRICT and the page h
Lea de Groot wrote:
Yes, speculation is useless.
One of my clients, for the month of August shows the follow figures in
their logs:
Count | % of screen used by window
Interesting, but you're missing a critical piece of data. Without
knowing what their resolution is at 100%, the value of the
Nick Lo wrote:
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT
4. Mayor Casts Doubt Over Magnetic Is Report (Great
Barrier Reef)
5. Hope for Maldives Rises from the Sea (Maldives)
...and looking at the how of doing that;
I came up with something. While it's not perfect, it works.
li{
mar
Andrew Krespanis wrote:
Opinions? Oh, we've all got lots of those...
That's what I was hoping for (even though it'll be to late for my
current project).
Personally, I'd go with number 3. (Is this a SimpleQuiz? Do we get a book :D)
The similarity to a "Simple Quiz" did occur to me. As far as
Kristof Neirynck wrote:
You've got php, right?
Sorry, but your answer is irrelevant as it completely ignores my
question. I wasn't asking "HOW" to make it work. I am already skilled in
CSS, JavaScript, and PHP and the methods suggested by the evolt article
are good for a beginner, but I find
Related to my last thread (Fake link,...), I'm debating which is the
better choice: using a consistent framework, but have an (usually) empty
dt, or use a ul for the top level? Here's what the code would look like:
*
Opt1
Sub-Menu Heading Opt2
Opt2a
I'm building an expanding menu and I'm trying to decide the best route
to take. The idea is that by clicking on an item it will either be a
link or open the sub-menu. The problem come in for the sub-menu headings
and IE's lack of support for :hover. So here are the options:
1) Heading;
2) Headi
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
well, imagine the user has a screenreader or braille display and is
tabbing through the form . they end up on the first submit button, and
have no way of knowing that there's more after that button, so they
submit it at the first intermediate step...not good.
That's not a
Taco Fleur wrote:
I have been putting duplicate buttons on one form when its a long
form, so the user does not have to scroll.
I have been told its not good for accessibility, what's the go?
While the duplication does reduce accessibility/usability in some ways,
but it also adds in others. IMO, t
Seona Bellamy wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm hoping that this doesn't count as off topic, but I need some help
figuring out the best way to mark up a section of code.
Category
- Subcategory
- Section
- Product
- Product
- Product
- Section
- Product
- Product
- Subcategory
- Section
- Pr
east wrote:
There is an issue with session generation through a web form and
validation. Automatically creating a session that is to be passed
through a POST creates a hidden input field directly after the first
form tag. Since in XHTML, a requires that a block level
element (like fieldset) e
Steven Clark wrote:
Mmm, interesting.The validator can't see the php, I know, but pull the
php off the page and it validates as strict, while put it on the page
and it doesn't! Cut and paste the code off the page for yourself into
a blank page and run it, you'll see it validates perfectly. Its t
Hill, Tim wrote:
Wow, that's big, can't believe they had to pay $40,000 that's huge.
Relative to the size of the companies, it's not that big; however, it is
big enough not to ignore and for other companies to sit up and take notice.
The bottom line is that this could be very good for business--o
Razvan Pop wrote:
I am having some problems with lists in Opera. Looks fine in IE and Firefox.
The URL: http://work.insoft.ro/
THE CSS: http://work.insoft.ro/stiluri/astraroger.css
Taking an educated guess, it looks like it stems from Opera's alternate
handling of floated elements without a spe
Audano, Chris wrote:
I’m new to CSS and I’m having difficulties trying to make two
paragraphs look as one (without extra line spacing). I have a graphic
to the left with a title “Contacts” to the right of the graphic. I
would like the “Contact Name” to go directly under the title
“Contacts” wit
Jim Barricks wrote:
(Have corrected all that but the problem remains. :(
(Forgot to add this to my last message.)
Also, you're use of is incorrect. You should either use a
or just style the directly (since it's already block level).
*
The disc
Jim Barricks wrote:
(Have corrected all that but the problem remains. :(
At least we now know what we're *not* dealing with.
The XHTML/CSS written by the JavaScript is invalid. Both are case
sensitive. While most browsers will still work with upper/mixed case,
the CSS probably won't. Class names
Jim Barricks wrote:
I'm in the process of converting over my old CSS/HTML site over to
CSS/XHTML standards and
trying to validate. On this page I have an watermark ad on the right
side which works perfectly on:
http://www.barricksinsurance.com/jokes_OLD.html
But when I change the DOCTYPE from "D
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
ALL software will have holes in it.
Fact is, mozilla had a patch for it the same day practically
In most cases, unless you follow security issues very closely, it's
likely you'll hear about the fix before the bug.
... IE's exploits go weeks, and most the time, months.
...i
Lea de Groot wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:29:51 +, amer amer wrote:
I am a beginner in HTML and CSS, I need to include a Search Tool (by
entering a keyword to search inside my website) in my new website,
does anyone help me in that?
Amer,
Thats not an on-topic post for this forum.
Pl
Adam Hennessy wrote:
Isn't it amusing that developers using web standards have to support the
browsers. In an ideal world it would be the other way around
It does "sound" backwards, however I disagree with the "ideal world"
part because I think it make logical sense. It's the standard backwards
Mark Harwood wrote:
Right, im playing with an "Elastic" Menu system built apon Nested &'s
Now i know this would be frowned apon probelry! But im open to a better way in
doing it?
Semantically, a nested ul is correct.
Anyway, back to my bug! On FireFox when you click on the Nav and it opens the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is the Firefox browser used by Web Developers? What does it have that
makes it a good tool? - over other browsers? Why not Opera?
To address the last question first, Opera happens to be a good choice as
well, though I think Firefox is better. The two main reason
Miles Tillinger wrote:
I've been able to find a few 4-column CSS layouts but they're all
either 4x fixed divs or 4x fluid divs. Before I embark on my own
voyage of discovery/pain, is there any examples that allow for a
mixture of fluid and fixed divs? I've thought a bit about it and I'm
envis
Kay Smoljak wrote:
www.example.com/foo/bar/ rather than www.example.com?foo=bar. In this
situation, the relative links no longer make sense
But using a leading slash eliminated the need for the .
Also, mod_rewrite works fine with relative addressing. When Apache
doesn't find the .htaccess file in
Kay Smoljak wrote:
www.example.com/foo/bar/ rather than www.example.com?foo=bar. In this
situation, the relative links no longer make sense
But using a leading slash eliminates the need for the .
Also, mod_rewrite works fine with relative addressing. When Apache
doesn't find the .htaccess file in
Anders Nawroth wrote:
Chris Stratford wrote:
just have the header point to: "styles/sheet.css"
Use "/styles/sheet.css".
In most cases that's probably best. However, another option is to use
mod_rewrite to also adjust the CSS location. It's even possible to have
only one main file which takes para
Patrick Lauke wrote:
[C]onsidering that HTML itself has such a kludgey, ambiguous and incomplete set
of tags anyway...[e]very acronym could also be marked up as an abbreviation, without losing too much semantic weight...
True, and because...
IE's lack of real support for abbr is a problem in thi
7 sinz wrote:
Im an 19 yer old desinger, with a particular interest in web design.
For the last 8 motnhs i've been huddled up in my workspace practising
my art learning the ins and out of CSS and pretty much learning the
language to a T.
Now, it took me a while to get here, but we all got to s
Lee Roberts wrote:
First Labels should not wrap the input. The elements within the Label tag become the label. By wrapping the input with the Label you are stating the input is part of its own Label. That's wrong.
Sorry, but that's wrong. Enclosing the input within the label is a
prescribed met
Justin French wrote:
Honestly, the most logical way I can see to do this is to have them in
three cells of a table row, since at least they'll be associated in a
row. 's would also be nice, but they're intended for
groupings of form elements, and using them for each text input seems
like a loa
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
You could already use them server-side, then transform them to
xhtml1.0 or 1.1 before serving them to the client
While transforming from XHTML 1.0 or 1.1 is a trivial task, from XHTML 2
to even 1.1 is not so. In some cases there's no equivalent (di), in
others there's more
Brian Cummiskey wrote:
XHTML 2 draft is out.
--
Sixth public Working Draft of XHTML 2.0 is now available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722
In many ways it is as if they went back to what HTML was meant to be,
and improved on that, rathe
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Call me overly cautious, but I don't think this is a topic for
discussion...
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Acollusion
You're overly cautious. There's a huge difference between discussing
what goes into setting a price or expressing opinion on what is a valid
pric
Seona Bellamy wrote:
I'm wanting to make a tabbed menu like the one suggested in ALA's Sliding
Doors I & II. All well and good, but the menu will be dynamically generated
and won't have a fixed number of items - from page to page it will differ.
There could be as few as four or as many as 12. There
Just read an interesting post at webmasterworld.com by DrDoc. He makes
the observation that most of the IE bugs can be solved by either setting
display to inline or inline-block.
It doesn't help with the box model problem, but then again, that's not a
bug. It's an intentionally incorrect render
Justin French wrote:
In my opinion, you still need to set a "default" width for the element
using the size attribute, for those without CSS. Yes, it will be
overridden with CSS for 99% of your browsing audience, but it safer to
put *something* in there as default, since you have no idea how a
101 - 200 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
