Re: [WSG] CSS Expandable Menu

Hi Grant, I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but this might help: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/dropdowns Unfortunately, this does require some javascript as IE doesn't support a few CSS elements. Cheers, Jelina On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:30 AM, wrote: > > Hello, > > I wou

Re: [WSG] css drop down input

On 12/02/2010 9:51 AM, PurencoolGmail wrote: input drop down don't worry silly #menu select *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help

Re: [WSG] CSS off button

Hi Paul, You can use select drop down box instead of buttons for the CSS switching - this can minimize the space in page and usability will be effective for the end users On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Paul Novitski wrote: > At 2/4/2010 10:43 AM, Erickson, Kevin (DOE) wrote: > >> Here is the p

RE: [WSG] CSS off button

At 2/4/2010 10:43 AM, Erickson, Kevin (DOE) wrote: Here is the page using your example: http://www.doetest.vi.virginia.gov/z_testing_area/kevin/test-css-off-from-wsg2.shtml I recommend that you give folks a c

Re: [WSG] CSS off button

...@webstandardsgroup.org] *On > Behalf Of *Jayachandran Kandasamy > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:25 AM > > *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > *Subject:* Re: [WSG] CSS off button > > Hi Kevin, > > I have tried some sample code for switching off the CSS in jQuery

Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Error

Hi I guess it's understand the consequences and use at your own risk. I doubt a vendor will change the spelling and if they do, I'm pretty sure they'd maintain BC by allowing both to work. Using the example of *-radius, the vendor differences are more to do with what the values selected will rende

RE: [WSG] CSS off button

lf Of Erickson, Kevin (DOE) Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:44 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS off button Thanks Jayachandran! That definitely works but is there a way that it could keep the CSS off when the visitor leaves the page? Using a cookie maybe? Here is the

RE: [WSG] CSS off button

From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Jayachandran Kandasamy Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:25 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS off button Hi Kevin, I have tried some sample code for switching

Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Error

On 4 Feb 2010, at 07:42, Joshua Street wrote: >> The validator does correctly parse as per the spec. The spec defines a way >> for vendor prefixes to exist without conflicting with anything in CSS, no >> more. This makes them part of the grammar, not the vocabulary, and the >> validator checks

Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Error

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:16 PM, David Dorward wrote: > On 4 Feb 2010, at 03:29, Joshua Street wrote: >>> The prefix may be "part of it" to address parsing issues, but - afaik - that >>> does not make these extensions CSS properties. >> >> Indeed - yet therein lies the frustration at the validator

Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Error

On 4 Feb 2010, at 03:29, Joshua Street wrote: >> >> The prefix may be "part of it" to address parsing issues, but - afaik - that >> does not make these extensions CSS properties. > > Indeed - yet therein lies the frustration at the validator failing to > correctly parse as per spec. The valid

Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Error

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Thierry Koblentz >> wrote: >> > -moz is a vendor prefix (not CSS3) >> >> Actually, vendor prefixes are a part of both CSS 2.1 >> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#vendor-keywords as well as the >> CS

RE: [WSG] CSS Validation Error

ius" come *last* in the declaration block -- Regards, Thierry | www.tjkdesign.com From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of James Ellis Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 6:10 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Erro

RE: [WSG] CSS Validation Error

> From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] > On Behalf Of Joshua Street > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 5:59 PM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Error > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Thierry Koblentz

Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Error

Hi You can safely ignore any -prefix validation errors (-moz, -webkit, -opera) - they are never going to validate on the W3C validator. The point of the vendor specific rules is to do stuff the W3C haven't standardised yet. The validator should probably ignore them as well. If you really must hav

Re: [WSG] CSS Validation Error

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote: > -moz is a vendor prefix (not CSS3) Actually, vendor prefixes are a part of both CSS 2.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#vendor-keywords as well as the CSS3 working draft... they're for proprietary extensions, of course, but it's a

RE: [WSG] CSS Validation Error

-moz is a vendor prefix (not CSS3) -- Regards, Thierry | www.tjkdesign.com From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Anderson Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:12 PM To: wsg Subject: [WSG] CSS Validation Error When I am vali

Re: [WSG] CSS off button

Oliver, This wont remove the head element but only the style and link tags .. but I didnt do the attribute level, I will try it out man.. thanks for the suggestion :) Cheers JC On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Oliver Boermans wrote: > On 27 January 2010 17:55, Jayachandran Kandasamy > wrote:

Re: [WSG] CSS off button

On 27 January 2010 17:55, Jayachandran Kandasamy wrote: >  $(document).ready(function(){ >   $("input.offButt").click(function() { >    if($("head:has(style)") && $("head:has(link)")){ > $("head:has(style)").remove(); > $("head:has(link)").remove(); >    } >   }); >  }); I’m pretty sure t

Re: [WSG] CSS off button

Hi Kevin, I have tried some sample code for switching off the CSS in jQuery. Please go through this code below and let me know how far it is helping you - if need anyother assistance please reply New Document http://code.jquery.com/jquery-latest.js";>

RE: [WSG] CSS off button

Yes. I have a prototype with the imports and it DOES work. Thanks -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Ted Drake Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 5:46 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS off button

Re: [WSG] CSS off button

urn off all CSS? Thanks, Kevin * From: Paul Novitski Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:44:30 -0800 Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS off button At 1/22/2010 12:22 PM, Erickson, Kevin (DOE) wrote: Could anyone please tell me if there is a righ

RE: [WSG] CSS off button

also be skipped. I haven't tested that, but I think it would work. -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Erickson, Kevin (DOE) Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 2:27 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS

RE: [WSG] CSS off button

, 2010 5:14 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS off button I think your requirements may be a bit confused. I would suggest you look at two articles 1. backwards compatible style switcher http://www.alistapart.com/articles/n4switch/ 2. zoom layout by Sir Joe Clark http

RE: [WSG] CSS off button

- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Oliver Boermans Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:54 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS off button Hi Kevin On 23 January 2010 06:52, Erickson, Kevin (DOE) wrote: > Could anyone please tell me

RE: [WSG] CSS off button

f you really want to turn off css, just have it switch to an empty css file. Ted -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Oliver Boermans Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 1:54 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG

Re: [WSG] CSS off button

Hi Kevin On 23 January 2010 06:52, Erickson, Kevin (DOE) wrote: > Could anyone please tell me if there is a right way to put a clickable > button in a web page that will turn off all CSS? Why do you want to switch off CSS? Reasons aside, the simplest method that jumps to my mind is to use an emp

Re: [WSG] CSS off button

Kevin, I believe you could do it with PHP by having your "Off" button reload the page, replacing your default header with one that omits your CSS file(s). You could use a cookie to make the other pages also load without CSS until the switch is toggled again. -- Nick Stone, MBA SEO & Web Acc

Re: [WSG] CSS off button

At 1/22/2010 12:22 PM, Erickson, Kevin (DOE) wrote: Could anyone please tell me if there is a right way to put a clickable button in a web page that will turn off all CSS? To be perhaps overly precise, I'm guessing that you probably don't want to turn off *all* styling because that would rend

Re: [WSG] css vallidation

Hi Marvin, Why there are several properties for the same selector and written twice .. few of them repeating .. can you please optimise it ? Try giving the background-color: transparent instead of background:transparent and try out.. May be some problem with the validator On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at

Re: [WSG] css error

Marvin Hunkin wrote: hi. well how to fix this. Marvin. Go to your CSS file. Find the declaration that reads: body { font: 100%/1.4 "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; <-- :: add background: #fff; } Amend that declaration to read: body { font: 100%/1.4 "Helvetica Neue", Arial

RE: [WSG] css tutorial

>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: >> Every other discussion group I participate in regards "clagnut" >> with derision. >> >> There is no good reason for anything other than font-size: 100%. > That's not an explanation. ALA published a follow-up by Richard on the sa

Re: [WSG] css tutorial

On Jan 15, 2010, at 1:45 AM, Matthew Pennell wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Chris F.A. Johnson > wrote: > Every other discussion group I participate in regards "clagnut" > With derision. > > There is no good reason for anything other than font-size: 100%. > > That's not an e

RE: [WSG] css tutorial

> Also, please try our Opera Web Standards Curriculum section 27 entitled "CSS > basics", > written and contributed by Christian Heilmann. > > Here is the hyperlink to it: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/27-css-basics/ There are a bunch of typos in there. - Extra semi-colons, - The :first-lin

Re: [WSG] css tutorial

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > Every other discussion group I participate in regards "clagnut" > with derision. > > There is no good reason for anything other than font-size: 100%. > That's not an explanation. ALA published a follow-up by Richard on the same to

Re: [WSG] css tutorial

On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Matthew Pennell wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Chris F.A. Johnson > wrote: > > > I find it hard to take it seriously when it has > > body { font-size:62.5%; } in > > > > If you're going to snipe, it's a good idea to provi

Re: [WSG] css tutorial

On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > I find it hard to take it seriously when it has > body { font-size:62.5%; } in > If you're going to snipe, it's a good idea to provide an explanation and say why you think something is a bad ide

Re: [WSG] css tutorial

On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Frank Palinkas wrote: > Hi Marvin. > > Also, please try our Opera Web Standards Curriculum section 27 entitled "CSS > basics", written and contributed by Christian Heilmann. > > Here is the hyperlink to it: > http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/27-css-basics/ I find it ha

Re: [WSG] css tutorial

Hi Marvin. Also, please try our Opera Web Standards Curriculum section 27 entitled "CSS basics", written and contributed by Christian Heilmann. Here is the hyperlink to it: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/27-css-basics/ Hope this helps you out a bit, Med vennlig hilsen / Kind regards, Frank

Re: [WSG] css tutorial

On Jan 14, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Hi Marvin, > > If you're looking for help on CSS and some reference materials then I can't > recommend the SitePoint CSS Reference [Located > at:http://reference.sitepoint.com/css] highly enough. And as Chris said, I'd > avoid W3Schools.com

RE: [WSG] css tutorial

g in up to date tutorial materials. All the best, Andrew Cooper P.S This is my first reply in the WSG Mailing List! :) > Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:35:45 -0500 > From: ch...@cfajohnson.com > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] css tutorial > > On

Re: [WSG] css tutorial

On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Doug Burt wrote: > Marvin, > You may want to try checking out the W3Schools at > http://www.w3schools.com/css/default.asp > That site should provide you with way more than enough information to do a > couple of tutorials.. Unless their CSS tutorial is better than their H

Re: [WSG] css tutorial

Marvin, You may want to try checking out the W3Schools at http://www.w3schools.com/css/default.asp That site should provide you with way more than enough information to do a couple of tutorials.. Cheers, DougB - Original Message - From: "Marvin Hunkin" To: Sent: Thursday, January

Re: [WSG] css tutorial

Hi Marvin, The w3schools tutorial is handy: http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_intro.asp The reference is useful too: http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_reference.asp Cheers, Rob Marvin Hunkin wrote: hi. well a member of blind geeks. and asked to write a short basic tutorial on css. did learn css

Re: [WSG] CSS Popup

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:14 PM, David Hucklesby wrote: > On 1/11/10 11:25 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: >> >> Hello list, >> >> I tried to repurpose this example from Eric Meyer: >> http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo.html >> >> His page works in IE6. >> >> My attempt, however, does not. Ca

Re: [WSG] CSS Popup

On 1/11/10 11:25 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: Hello list, I tried to repurpose this example from Eric Meyer: http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo.html His page works in IE6. My attempt, however, does not. Can anyone see why? http://www.mlinc.com/css_popup/ Thanks in advance Yup. You n

RE: [WSG] CSS list-style

Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > > content > > > ul { > color:#380; > list-style-type:disc; > } > > ul li.black { > color:#000; > } Then apparently Michael Brockington wrote: >> Chris, >> I am not sure what system you tested this on, but it doesn't work on >> any system I tried, and

RE: [WSG] CSS list-style

.@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] > On Behalf Of Chris F.A. Johnson > Sent: 06 October 2009 19:00 > To: wsg > Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS list-style > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Richard Mather wrote: > > > > content > > > ul { > col

RE: [WSG] CSS list-style

rgh.gov.uk This message does not reflect the opinions of any entity other than the author alone. -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Chris F.A. Johnson Sent: 06 October 2009 19:00 To: wsg Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS list-style

RE: [WSG] CSS list-style

Hi Rich, You can always get rid of the list-style-type and add the disc as an image in whichever color you want. I think that on CSS2.1 the disc (or letters or numbers for that matter) will always be the same color of the list element or as you say, having to add a span, which is ugly. Che

Re: [WSG] CSS list-style

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Richard Mather wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm wondering about colouring bullet points in a and wanted to know if > there was a way of having the list-style: a different colour to the text > within the without having to resort to putting it all within a > as per my example: > > >

Re: [WSG] CSS Styling in IE

Hey Nass,   It looks like the floated details with Buildline Constructions' address details are what's jagging IE;   Check out: http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/floatIndent.html for an explanation; and some ways to fix   Kind regards,   Ads,   Adam Smith Operations

Re: [WSG] CSS 3 Media Queries & iPhone / Opera Mini 4

Christian Montoya wrote: I am looking into delivering an iPhone-specific stylesheet and I came across this: For example, to specify a style sheet for iPhone, use an expression similar to the following: [...] I have been playing with media queries coded directly in the style sheet with some s

Re: [WSG] CSS IE6/7 - what a surprise

Thanks for your replies. Non-expanding div issue I removed the :after stuff altogether (which initially broke the layout in Mac browsers) This fixed IE7: *:first-child+html .catalogueMid, *:first-child+html .subscribeMid { overflow: hidden; } Adding the following styles to the containi

Re: [WSG] CSS IE6/7 - what a surprise

ack.. sincere apologies. If you view positioniseverything.net, they use a class of clearfix for this fix, and I think it is poor practice to add mark-up to help IE behave. However, David is correct, as i copied and pasted without checking myself. So the :after should have been left out for

Re: [WSG] CSS IE6/7 - what a surprise

Just to correct Todd's reply, the :after property isnt support by either IE7 or IE6 (and below), therefore you would need to adjust your CSS to state (assuming you're using a CSS hack, for ease of display): #NameofContainingDiv { *zoom: 1; /* all your other styles for the element */ }

Re: [WSG] CSS IE6/7 - what a surprise

Damian probably gave you your answer, but I'll also say that if you review the original documentation from http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html for the code you're using, you'll see that they recommend conditional comments to trigger hasLayout. In your case, in the head of

RE: [WSG] CSS IE6/7 - what a surprise

Most likely a lack of hasLayout triggers or layout context changes, or both. For the coloured boxes, add overflow:hidden to the divs with classes catalougeMid and subscribeMid. This will force them into a new layout context and in turn expand the container to contain all elements. If you want it

Re: [WSG] CSS IE6/7 - what a surprise

Hi Guys, This is my first posting. For clearing floats other reference which could be checked are : http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/floatclear Also the book "Everything You Know About CSS is Wrong" page 26 onwards there is material regards dhanishth At 02:06 PM 1/23/2009, you wr

Re: [WSG] css Help Please

On 12/01/2009, at 11:37 AM, Marvin Hunkin wrote: Sorry! We found the following errors (3) URI : file://localhost/C:\DOCS\MarvinsWebsite\styles.css 6 div header Lexical error at line 5, column 2. Encountered: "i" (105), after : "<" id="Borg; width: 400px; margin: 1% auto;"> } OK, you haven

Re: [WSG] css Help Please

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:37:29 +1100, Marvin Hunkin wrote: > Hi. > got these three errors. > but cannot seem to fix them. > can you help. > cheers Marvin. > > W3C CSS Validator results for > file://localhost/C:\DOCS\MarvinsWebsite\styles.css (CSS level 2.1) Sorry! We > found the > following errors (

RE: [WSG] css Help Please

Marvin, It is a little hard for us to help you when you do not include the offending source code. Regards, Mike -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Marvin Hunkin Sent: 12 January 2009 01:37 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] CSS invisible to IE

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:02:21 +0500, Fuji kusaka wrote: > Is there any way to code css (not conditional inline css), so that the CSS > apply online > to FF? I'm confused. Your subject line refers to IE, yet your question only refers to FF.(?) If you wish to target Firefox only, it will very much

Re: [WSG] CSS invisible to IE

Here is an article about hacks for Fx, Opera and IE: http://www.nealgrosskopf.com/tech/thread.asp?pid=20 On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Brett Patterson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are conditional CSS HTML codes that can apply to FF. If you want to > use them, you can try: > > > > If t

Re: [WSG] CSS invisible to IE

There are conditional CSS HTML codes that can apply to FF. If you want to use them, you can try: If the above does not work, try adding an additional N in , as in . On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Luke Hoggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi, > > This list isn't really a help desk. For such

Re: [WSG] CSS invisible to IE

Hi, This list isn't really a help desk. For such things Google is your friend. Anyway, there are various methods/hacks available. My preference is to use child selectors eg #container .something { /* this will be used in ie6 */ } #container > .something { /* this will be used in firef

Re: [WSG] CSS and printing absolute units

Hi, Try using picas (pc) or points (pt). I haven't had this problem before myself, but I believe that it may be caused by the fact that printers have no concept of what a cm or mm is. A good description of pc and pt is at http://www.guistuff.com/css/css_units.html (down the page a bit) che

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

>> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:36:26 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote: >> >>> - What's the support across browsers / machines for the font-size-adjust >>> property? - >>> Is adjusting the aspect value bad form? Is this as bad as letter-spacing >>> body >>> copy? Would this kill sheep? >>> - Has anyone d

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

On 2008/10/21 23:40 (GMT+0700) Rob Schumann composed: > I've updated the aspect-ratio/x-widths article to include the 6 'C' > fonts of Vista > At some point you might want to mention that, unlike most monospace fonts, which match

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

Hi Christian, Christian Montoya wrote on 21-10-2008: > > Thanks Rob, I think that just about answers all my questions. Would > it be possible for you to update your tables with the Vista fonts? > I've updated the aspect-ratio/x-widths article to include the 6 'C' fonts of Vista

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

On 2008/10/21 18:14 (GMT+0700) Rob Schumann composed: > Christian Montoya wrote on 20-10-2008: > > http://unitinteractive.com/blog/2008/06/26/better-css-font-stacks/ > Back in September 2006 I wrote a piece that reached some similar > conclusions to that above >

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Rob Schumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Christian Montoya wrote on 20-10-2008: > > > http://unitinteractive.com/blog/2008/06/26/better-css-font-stacks/ > > Back in September 2006 I wrote a piece that reached some similar > conclusions to that ab

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

Hi Christian, Christian Montoya wrote on 20-10-2008: > http://unitinteractive.com/blog/2008/06/26/better-css-font-stacks/ Back in September 2006 I wrote a piece that reached some similar conclusions to that above At the time the

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

On Oct 20, 2008, at 1:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want to save money and have an all round free open source editor that does CSS, PHP, javascript, and other major languages I would suggest notepad++. Been using it since it was first available and haven't looked at anything el

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

I use HTML-Kit which is free Web page Editing/Authoring facility that provides the following features: * Multiple File type editing: .html, .xml, .css, .rdf, .php, .js etc. * Can be used for hand coding ala MS Notepad * Pre-formed constructs, elements & attributes can be used via drop-down

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:21 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am sure most experienced Web authors know this, but some newer ones might > > not. A quick and handy way to incrementally zoom and/or change text size > > when viewing a web pag

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

Christian Montoya wrote: Could someone please read the body of my email instead of just looking at the title and then post a response that is on-topic? OK :-) CSS2's 'font-size-adjust' support is limited to Gecko/Fx IIRC, and is probably put on hold by the W3C CSS group for the time being - t

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:21 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am sure most experienced Web authors know this, but some newer ones might > not. A quick and handy way to incrementally zoom and/or change text size when > viewing a web page is via keyboard shortcuts (Windows O/S): > Could someone

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:41 PM, David Hucklesby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:36:26 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote: >> >> - What's the support across browsers / machines for the font-size-adjust >> property? >> - Is adjusting the aspect value bad form? Is this as bad as lett

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:36:26 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote: > > - What's the support across browsers / machines for the font-size-adjust > property? > - Is adjusting the aspect value bad form? Is this as bad as letter-spacing > body copy? > Would this kill sheep? > - Has anyone done this before?

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:21 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am sure most experienced Web authors know this, but some newer ones might > > not. A quick and handy way to incrementally zoom and/or change text size > > when viewing a web pag

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

Christian Montoya wrote: Could someone please read the body of my email instead of just looking at the title and then post a response that is on-topic? OK :-) CSS2's 'font-size-adjust' support is limited to Gecko/Fx IIRC, and is probably put on hold by the W3C CSS group for the time being - t

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

I use HTML-Kit which is free Web page Editing/Authoring facility that provides the following features: * Multiple File type editing: .html, .xml, .css, .rdf, .php, .js etc. * Can be used for hand coding ala MS Notepad * Pre-formed constructs, elements & attributes can be used via drop-down

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:21 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am sure most experienced Web authors know this, but some newer ones might > not. A quick and handy way to incrementally zoom and/or change text size when > viewing a web page is via keyboard shortcuts (Windows O/S): > Could someone

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

I am sure most experienced Web authors know this, but some newer ones might not. A quick and handy way to incrementally zoom and/or change text size when viewing a web page is via keyboard shortcuts (Windows O/S): Here is an expanded and updated compilation for zooming and/or changing text size

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

I use Aptana for all of my web development (XHTML/CSS/Rails/PHP). It was just purchased by another company, but they do offer a community version for free (Pro version for $99). (Link: http://www.aptana.com/studio/). They do have a Mac version, although I've never used it, I'm a PC guy, but it's fr

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want to save money and have an all round free open source editor that does CSS, PHP, javascript, and other major languages I would suggest notepad++. Ignoring the fact that the OP requested a Mac -- not Windows-only -- solution :-) So I'll mention jEdit

Re: [WSG] CSS font-size-adjust

Just to throw this in the mix -> stop trying to control the font size! I dont require reading glasses (yet...), but due to weak eyesight for small fonts and high-resolution screens causing poor font scaling, I choose to increase the size of the default values for some fonts eg: I setup fonts to

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

Quoting tee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:42 AM, Gicela Morales wrote: Thanks everyone. I like the idea of TextMate and TextWrangler! Gicela :-) 2008/10/20 James Jeffery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have both BBEdit and TextMate. I use TextMate alot because it's a nice and simple te

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:42 AM, Gicela Morales wrote: Thanks everyone. I like the idea of TextMate and TextWrangler! Gicela :-) 2008/10/20 James Jeffery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have both BBEdit and TextMate. I use TextMate alot because it's a nice and simple text editor. Project creation is ea

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

Nick, yes, CSS Edit is fantastic ;) for my students, entirely new to webdesign as well as coding (I am teaching webdesign, the web standard's way - and full on handcoding) - CSS Edit is proving a great help :) The fact that we can go and not only take a closer look at any given site's CSS - but

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

Greg, how do they compare... that really depends on what you need your code editor to do ;) You've got to give Smultron credit for being such a good editor, syntax highlighting etc - and being open source. So as an editor - if this is all you need - it's perfect. If, like me, you work a numb

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

Prisca, I have a graphic designer that swears by CSS Edit for all of his CSS modifications. On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Gregory Alan Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Prisca-- > > Like Gicela, I too am new to Macs. I'm using Smultron and like it a great > deal. How does it compare with CS

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

Prisca-- Like Gicela, I too am new to Macs. I'm using Smultron and like it a great deal. How does it compare with CSS Edit and Coda? .greg "These are the days of miracle and wonder." On Mon 20/10/08 03:00 , "Prisca schmarsow" [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: Gicela, yes - CSS Edit is fantastic :)

RE: [WSG] CSS editors

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gicela Morales > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 2:51 AM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: [WSG] CSS editors > > Hi Everyone, > > I've just migrated form PC to a new macbook  :-) but was wondering about the best xhtml/css edit

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

I'm Dreamweaver and hand write code. Years ago I used to use BBedit and loved it, however, I also moved from mac to pc years ago. I'm sorry that Barebones didn't develop versions for the pc. The companies I tend to work for are PC only Nancy On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:52 AM, designer <[EMAIL P

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

Does no-one use Topstyle? http://www.newsgator.com/Individuals/TopStyle/Default.aspx Bob *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMA

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

Thanks everyone. I like the idea of TextMate and TextWrangler! Gicela :-) 2008/10/20 James Jeffery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have both BBEdit and TextMate. > > I use TextMate alot because it's a nice and simple text editor. Project > creation is easy also, you just drag in project folders. > > I l

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

I'm using CODA too... I think it's a great tools since when still using PC, I'm get used to EditPlus. Rgds, Muswardi On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Last time I used a Mac I edited with Text Wrangler > > > > http://www.barebones.com/products/textwrangler/d

Re: [WSG] CSS editors

I have both BBEdit and TextMate. I use TextMate alot because it's a nice and simple text editor. Project creation is easy also, you just drag in project folders. I like BBEdit when I am doing Java, C/C++ and general programming, but depending on the task I will use XCode aswell. If it's just HTM

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >