[XenPPC] [PATCH] fix prose builder

Summary: fix for the prose builder. Minor fixed for the prose builder. Signed-off-by: Maria Butrico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -r 5568efb41da4 tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c --- a/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c Mon Jan 15 13:27:20 2007 -0500 +++ b/tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c T

Re: [XenPPC] Re: shutdown/destroy domU problem

I just remembered a fact perhaps relevant to this. At some point in the past I applied a patch to the linux tree we ('we' is the community that is reporting this problem) use on xen which was forwarded to me by Jimi. The patch subject is: "[RFC/PATCH] Maple: Use RTAS power off methods if

[XenPPC] xend and routes

We have several JS21, all with two ethernet interfaces, both interfaces in use.For example this is what things look like when we boot one such blade with the latest xen and linux for xen and before starting xend. cso89:~ # ifconfig ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:11:25:C9:

Re: [XenPPC] Crash on js12

This problem is solved on the latest version of Xen. I would encourage Tony, who is running tests, to test all forms of xen, debug and not (I am assuming that he uses an automated procedure, so is just a matter of setting it up to go twice). Maria Butrico wrote: I seem to be the only person

Re: [XenPPC] Crash with ssh

Jimi, where did you get the idea that this linux was SMP. I recall that we build Linux for SMP even though we run it UP if we boot it on a xen partition.Maybe you see something I missed. Jimi Xenidis wrote: Thanks for clarifying this Dilma, there is no Xen present if the Linux is SMP :)

Re: [XenPPC] [linux-ppc-2.6] [LINUX][XEN][POWEPRC] def config changes

I want to quibble about this change. First this is not an # Automatically generated make config: don't edit I thought we diligently updated this file by hand. We edit it all the time. The comment is flat out wrong. (I know you did not change the comment today, but I am in a quibbling m

Re: [XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [TOOLS][POWERPC] use python "quad" encoding for 2 cell devtree values

in /var/xen Jimi Xenidis wrote: On Oct 18, 2006, at 5:50 PM, Maria Butrico wrote: This patch is not yet in our tree. I am getting a little tired of doing this. I bet! It can certainly wait, just know that you cannot create >= 2G domains until this makes it in to your stuff.

Re: [XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [TOOLS][POWERPC] use python "quad" encoding for 2 cell devtree values

This patch is not yet in our tree. I am getting a little tired of doing this. Maria Butrico Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [XenPPC] Re: Automated reliability report for SMP patch on JS2x

Yorktown we have booted successfully only on JS20 model 21X. Maria Butrico wrote: Jimi, the problem with this approach is that as changes are made to the Xen code, you have no idea if they make the smp situation better or worse. If you introduce a bug only visible with SMP or more likely to

Re: [XenPPC] Cannot boot from local disk

Kawachiya-san, seems that your problem today is different from yesterday. You have however not answered any of my questions. So here is goes again. Kawachiya-san, can you tell us exactly what kind of js20 is this. I just learned that there are two, the 21X (of which we have some in Yorktown

[XenPPC] [PATCH] fixes makefile clean logic

summary: fixes makefile clean logic details: The three files xen-syms.S xen-lds and asm-offsets.s, all in the xen/arch/powerpc subdirectory, are created by make. Thus they should be removed by make clean. Signed-of-by: Maria Butrico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -r ea14174c392b xen/arch/p

Re: [XenPPC] Re: Automated reliability report for SMP patch on JS2x

plies the smp patch. Jimi Xenidis wrote: On Oct 3, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Maria Butrico wrote: What's really interesting to me about this is that the invocation of the icache invalidation did not go in till later. But it did include the I/D cache flush of text. The i-cache invalidate you spea

[XenPPC] Re: Automated reliability report for SMP patch on JS2x

e SMP patch be applied to the base, and that in those case where we known that SMP fails, like on maples, we use the nosmp option. Maria Butrico [EMAIL PROT

[Fwd: Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] Parse Xen command line properly]

dom0 parameters, such as console=X, has meaning to the Xen parser. First reported by Maria Butrico. Signed-off-by: Amos Waterland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- setup.c | 16 ++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff -r 261c458e46af xen/arch/powerpc/setup.c ---

Re: [XenPPC] xm dump-core

If anyone knows anything about how this is supposed to work I can take quick stab at it. We can probably use it. Jimi Xenidis wrote: On Sep 28, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Maria Butrico wrote: I can dump part of the core file out but not all. I see a message about connection refused to xend. Yet

[XenPPC] xm dump-core

I can dump part of the core file out but not all. I see a message about connection refused to xend. Yet xend is running.Are there tools for reading the core file? ___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xen

[XenPPC] Xen hang

This is new (at least for me) (on a js21 with 8G, cso91) (XEN) Physical RAM map: (XEN) End of RAM: 10240MB (10485760kB) (XEN) total_pages: 0x001fc000 (XEN) free_xenheap: 0x55000 - 0x40 (XEN) Xen heap: 63MB (65196kB) (XEN) free_xenheap: 0xb36000 - 0x400 (XEN) free_xenheap: Go

Re: [XenPPC] JS20 does not boot with latest pull

Dan, do you have a js20? Jimi Xenidis wrote: uh oh. These are really old processor and may have SCOM issues those having a boot problem please comment out the body on cpu_scom_init() in: xen/arch/powerpc/powerpc64/ppc970_scom.c and see let me know if it works? -JX On Sep 25, 2006, at 5:52 P

[XenPPC] console in the background

Putting the partition xen console in the background (e. g, xm create -c ... & or xm console &) seems to kill the console (xenconsole) process. Is this behavior expected? ___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.x

[XenPPC] [PATCH] fix allocation bug in xen console

summary: fixes allocation error for xen console area details: previous code worked correctly only if the allocated structure fitted in same page as the base address. If the allocated structure did not fit, the computation for the allocation was incorrect. Signed-of-by: Maria Butrico <[EM

Re: [XenPPC] heads up: large nasty merge

Tony Breeds wrote: On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 06:04:54PM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: I just committed a large nasty merge to xenppc-unstable and linux-ppc-2.6. You definitely need to pull both at once. The big change is that dom0_ops was fragmented into separate hcalls, so if you don't updat

[XenPPC] console=com2 boot argument

This boot command line does not work *bootargs = xen console=com2 -- console=ttyS1,19200 ro root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=9.2.208.86:/home/apw/devel/nfsroots/sles10-rootfs ip=9.2.129.20::9.2.129.2:255.255.255.0:kpblade7:eth1:off* The problem is that in console.c opt_console is set to 'ttyS1,19200'

Re: [XenPPC] Out of memory issues with xen

Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 15:16 -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote: On Aug 25, 2006, at 3:00 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 14:18 -0400, Maria Butrico wrote: I should report to the list some of issues we have been having with memory when using xen

[XenPPC] Out of memory issues with xen

I should report to the list some of issues we have been having with memory when using xen, it's dom0 and another partition. The first problem is that by default dom0 only has 64M and that there is no way to change this other that changing xen (the fix is easy enough). 64M is too little to run

Re: [XenPPC] Error creating domain on JS20 (Fw: [Prose-jvm] Brief Status in TRL (2006/08/24))

Kawachiya-san tried this patch and it worked for him. Thank you. Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 10:35 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 10:42 -0400, Kiyokuni Kawachiya wrote: Today, I installed necessary tools including mercurial to LinuxPPC, self-bu

Re: [XenPPC] current crash

Additional information: Orran and I have modified xen to show all hcalls made by domains other than 0 and idle. In addition we are not showing hcall x20, event channel operation (because we get one for every character put to the partition console.) Should the code below also show HSRRs? Orr

Re: [XenPPC] Error creating domain on JS20 (Fw: [Prose-jvm] Brief Status in TRL (2006/08/24))

I have the latest SLOF (6331) kpblade4:/proc/device-tree/cpus # ls #address-cells linux,phandle name PowerPC,[EMAIL PROTECTED] #size-cells smp-enabled I also probably have a old blade. But your statement is correct: "Almost all JS20". However, that is not the same as all the JS20. S

[XenPPC] Error creating domain on JS20 (Fw: [Prose-jvm] Brief Status in TRL (2006/08/24))

Maria Butrico - Forwarded by Maria Butrico/Watson/IBM on 08/24/2006 10:15 AM - Kiyokuni Kawachiya

Re: [XenPPC] making xen tools on dom0 can be slow

Maria Butrico wrote: This was discussed yesterday and it was suggested that I should enter a bug for this. Since then I have done a few experiments: By default dom0 has 64M. Under these condition make tools takes 24 minutes on a js20. make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/j9/xen-ppc/tools'

[XenPPC] making xen tools on dom0 can be slow

en to give each domain 128M, xm create no longer works. Jimi is debugging this.) Also I reported slowness for starting xend. I am still working with this and will post to the list as soon as I have more data. Simply giving more memory to dom0 does not fix the slow xend start problem. Mar

[XenPPC] [PATCH] Fix domU device tree creation for JS20/1

Summary: Fix device tree creation for domU for js20/1 under SLOF The device tree of dom0 on js20 and js21 with SLOF does not have the cpus' d and i cache sets nor does it have the l2 cache subdirectory. Signed-off-by: Maria Butrico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -r 326e6736d92b tools

[XenPPC] xend and device tree on js20 and js21

This is what the device tree looks like on a js21 (under SLOF) kpblade7 PowerPC,[EMAIL PROTECTED] # ls -l total 11 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4 Aug 21 12:42 clock-frequency -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4 Aug 21 12:42 d-cache-line-size -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4 Aug 21 12:42 d-cache-size -r--r--r-- 1 r

Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] Fix compilation errors

I am not sure what this means. The code from the hg repository still does not compile. Jimi Xenidis wrote: On Aug 20, 2006, at 9:58 PM, Maria Butrico wrote: Summary: Allow compilation under gcc4 diff -r dbe9249ba61b xen/arch/powerpc/oftree.h I covered the current.h issues with dan

Re: [XenPPC] xend error messages

Jimi Xenidis wrote: On Aug 19, 2006, at 4:38 PM, Maria Butrico wrote: These are from xend-debug.log. What do they indicate? Are they fatal? /home/j9/xen-tools/etc/xen/scripts/xen-network-common.sh: line 130: brctl: command not found /usr/lib/python2.4/xmllib.py:9: DeprecationWarning: The

Re: [XenPPC] xend error messages

poff wrote: We have xen running on an Intel blade with SuSE10; may be helpful to view scripts & logs... Thank you Don. Kawachiya-san also has mini-os running on x86 and I have his scripts. They work for him, but not for me. ___ Xen-ppc-devel

[XenPPC] xm error

I get the same error with xm (I updated last night). [2006-08-21 12:08:13 xend.XendDomainInfo 5985] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:189) XendDomainInfo.create(['vm', ['name', 'J9-Lib-OS'], ['memory', 32], ['on_crash', 'destroy'], ['vcpus', 1], ['image', ['linux', ['kernel', '/home/j9/bin/j9') [2006-

[XenPPC] [PATCH]

Summary: Allow compilation under gcc4 Current Xen does not compile. Declaration shadows parameters. Signed-off-by: Maria Butrico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -r dbe9249ba61b xen/arch/powerpc/oftree.h --- a/xen/arch/powerpc/oftree.h Sun Aug 20 13:28:45 2006 -0400 +++ b/xen/arch/powerpc/of

[XenPPC] [PATCH] Fix compilation errors

Summary: Allow compilation under gcc4 Current Xen does not compile. Declaration shadows parameters. Signed-off-by: Maria Butrico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -r dbe9249ba61b xen/arch/powerpc/oftree.h --- a/xen/arch/powerpc/oftree.h Sun Aug 20 13:28:45 2006 -0400 +++ b/xen/arch/powerpc/of

[XenPPC] shadow.c

#include #include #include #include int shadow_control_op(struct domain *d, dom0_shadow_control_t *sc, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(dom0_op_t) u_dom0_op) { if ( unlikely(d == current->domain) ) { DPRINTK("Don't try to do a shadow op on yourself!

[XenPPC] shadow.c

___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

[XenPPC] xen does not compile where is shadow.c?

I get lots of shadow errors. patch forthcoming. Where is shadow.c? ___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

[XenPPC] xm use

From the wiki Ramdisk: Since we do not have VIO yet you will have to use a ramdisk fro your rootf, one is available from this link . Err, my tiny does not need any disk or vio. I am not starting

Re: [XenPPC] new dom1 script, ok.. we are back to normal functionality,

Jimi Xenidis wrote: I managed to introduce a bug during my first merge, and we have shadow ops to deal with. Sorry for the inconvenience, Here is my latest dom1 script. you can get the ramdisk.image.gz from: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPPC/Build?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=ramd

[XenPPC] [PATCH] Fix compilation error in tools

Summary: Fixes compilation error Unmodified (without patch) code does not compile on stock SLES10 systems. Signed-off-by: Maria Butrico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -r 279843441136 tools/libxc/powerpc64/xc_linux_build.c --- a/tools/libxc/powerpc64/xc_linux_build.cWed Aug 16 17:19:3

[XenPPC] domain creation error

I am trying to create a domain. The error I receive from xm is very generic and I cannot readily see what is wrong: This is what I get xm create xen-domain-config Using config file "xen-domain-config". /usr/lib/python2.4/xmllib.py:9: DeprecationWarning: The xmllib module is obsolete. Use xml

[XenPPC] xend error messages

These are from xend-debug.log. What do they indicate? Are they fatal? /home/j9/xen-tools/etc/xen/scripts/xen-network-common.sh: line 130: brctl: command not found /usr/lib/python2.4/xmllib.py:9: DeprecationWarning: The xmllib module is obsolete. Use xml.sax instead. warnings.warn("The xmlli

[XenPPC] xm and xend use

Are there debug option of any sort for these two? debug build options? PS: Send more memory, anytime. ___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

[XenPPC] packages needed to support xen tools

From the xen/ppc wiki: --- For convenience, here is a list of rpms I needed for Dom0 running SLES-10 *libgcrypt-devel*, *glibc-devel*, *python-devel*, *ncurses-devel-5.5-18*, *zlib-devel*, *openssl-devel*, and *gcc*. I am looking at the sles10 install dvd images. We have libgcrypt-dev

Re: [XenPPC] mini-os

at is a small domU with a stipped down JVM. I was hoping to start with a working, small os . Are there any out there that have been ported to Xen/ppc? Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 15:13 -0400, Maria Butrico wrote: What is the correct invocation for building mini-o

[XenPPC] mini-os

What is the correct invocation for building mini-os for powerpc? Maria Butrico ___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

[Fwd: Re: [XenPPC] wiki instructions]

wrote: On Aug 14, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Maria Butrico wrote: The wiki at http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPPC/Build states if your cross toolchain is not capable of generating both 64-bit and 32-bit code then you will have to add CROSS32_COMPILE=powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu- to all you Linux

[XenPPC] wiki instructions

The wiki at http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPPC/Build states if your cross toolchain is not capable of generating both 64-bit and 32-bit code then you will have to add CROSS32_COMPILE=powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu- to all you Linux building commands. I have been iusing CROSS_COMPILE32. Is

[XenPPC] building xen in separate build directory

Is there a make option to build xen (for ppc) in such a a way that the object files and the rest of the output of make will go in a subdirectory other than the one where the source is? ___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com

Re: [XenPPC] Booting xen_maple_defconfig kernel on bare hardware

Maria Butrico wrote: Maria Butrico wrote: You are correct. The output is stopping, but the machine is up. I cannot ssh to it tho, but I can ping it. It has been more than 15 minutes since I rebooted so it's not that it has not had time to start all the things. How far did you ge

Re: [XenPPC] Booting xen_maple_defconfig kernel on bare hardware

Amos Waterland wrote: It would be nice to boot the exact same Linux kernel binary image on bare hardware and as a Xen dom0 on that same hardware. At present we cannot do this: you stop seeing output early in the boot process. I spent some time using OF output routines to track down the problem,

Re: [XenPPC] Booting xen_maple_defconfig kernel on bare hardware

Maria Butrico wrote: You are correct. The output is stopping, but the machine is up. I cannot ssh to it tho, but I can ping it. It has been more than 15 minutes since I rebooted so it's not that it has not had time to start all the things. How far did you get and did you see al

Re: [XenPPC] Booting xen_maple_defconfig kernel on bare hardware

You are correct. The output is stopping, but the machine is up. I cannot ssh to it tho, but I can ping it. It has been more than 15 minutes since I rebooted so it's not that it has not had time to start all the things. How far did you get and did you see all the console output? I was usi

Re: [XenPPC] noHV status

Mark F Mergen wrote: The problem state Linux on Xen-PPC has been mostly running for about a week, but with some instability due to loose ends in pte flush. This area of Linux has changed significantly since the version used for the prototype based on Rhype, so it's taken a few days to find t