try the 'pop3links' xmail feature, but there must be
some way =
out to resolve this through the xmail files configuration.
Many Thanks,=20
Sachin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of CLEMENT Francis
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 4:09 PM
To: 'xmail
Well, you use a 2.6.x kernel, good !
But this unique info is not suffisant to help you accuratly ...
Please, can you tell us the exact linux distribution you are using with
exact distrib version ?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent:
Don't know 'in-spamblock.sh' ...
Any package name or link to the source web site ?
As xmail doesn't do 'content filtering' itself, the returned error is only
generated by the filter, so you need to ask for help to the
'in-spamblock.sh' author ;)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De :
Simple way, with no additional software (only in the windows box tools) :
At time of link full :
- in cmd line : Netstat -a -n, to get list of currently open tcp
connections (find connections to port 110)
- using xmail pop3 log file, get the corresponding connected users
- check the mailboxs
I had the same problem when changing some old scsi servers with new sata
servers
Solution we found : Come back to scsi :)
At low or medium price, Sata components (controlers and disks) are just good
for very small servers or medium professional workstations ...
You will never get the same
Hello
This post is not directly xmail or glst related, but I don't know where to
post at this time for informations.
Trying to use the content of glst-lame.dbm to generate some local blacklist,
i noticed that some entries indicate 192.168 private network !
As my internal network don't use this
Hello Edinilson
You need some tools like Process Viewer included in Windows 2000 (or 2003)
Support Tools available on the original CD, in the \support\tools directory
(launch the .msi file to setup)
W2000 SP4 :
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=f08d28f3-b835-4847-
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 15:22, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hello
This post is not directly xmail or glst related, but I don't know where
to post at this time for informations.
Trying to use the content of glst-lame.dbm to generate some local
The program used on the other side to do the 'reverse check' is simple not
RFC compliant :)
(Does the 'reverse check' an integrated Exim fonctionnality or an add-on ? I
don't know ...)
The exact RFC mail from syntax IS : MAIL FROM:senderemail
IMOO, changing xmail to accept no rfc compliant
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de decker
Envoyé : lundi 30 octobre 2006 12:41
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Email address reverse check
Hellos,
I'm on a different comp than usual so I may be off here since I'm
missing the
I agree with Davide
RFC not only apply to MTA but to MUA too and to final users too (programs or
humans) :)
As the MUA interacts with the user, it's to the MUA responsibility to
correct the user (automaticaly or not) if users can't be made RFC compliant
( hard to achieve :) ).
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Helio Cavichiolo Jr
Envoyé : lundi 6 novembre 2006 22:53
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Copying messages
Em Segunda 06 Novembro 2006 18:08, Davide Libenzi escreveu:
Ask CIA. This outta be
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: 11/13/06 10:14 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages
If the filter removed the message file, how do you plan to recover
from that? :)
You don't - but a good MTA should *log* abnormal situations - like when
it
Create dummy accounts in your xmail server (on a dummy domain like
relay.relay), one account for each sending server, then disable pop3 for
them (user.tab file setting)
Send your customers they respective login (syntax : [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and
password and ask them to use SMTP Authentication when
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoyé : jeudi 18 janvier 2007 18:55
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: wlex doubt
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Filip Supera wrote:
Hello,
In smtp.ipprop.tab, I have this line :
: [xmail] Re: XMail acting as a smarthost for dynamic IP's
If XMail1 is on a dynamic IP address and XMail2 is on a static, and I =
want XMail2 to send all mail for XMail1, how would I setup XMail1?=20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On Behalf Of CLEMENT
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
On
Behalf Of CLEMENT Francis
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 4:25 AM
To: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail acting as a smarthost for dynamic IP's
ETRN mode seems to be the good choice
Configure xmail1
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:36 AM
To: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Subject: [xmail] Re: Strange xmail 'Network kernel error' only when sending
to yahoo s ervers !
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
99% of chances
For spam filtering, at first we use xmail rbl check with only
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org base (the most accurate and complete, I think), with no
rdns and checkmailerdomain activated on xmail because of too many badly
configured servers and dns/rdns entries on the net ... so too many 'lost'
connections
As xmail is a MTA, it don't care about the mail content itself and its
headers, it only take the delivery info from the smtp session, so the
'error-report' email will be the smtp sender (MAIL FROM)
You have two simple choices (not exhaustive):
1 - Use the 'Mail From' address as the 'MAIL FROM'
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Emmanuel Gonzalez
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 7 f=E9vrier 2007 10:52
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Filters
Hello,
I have (on win2K3 plateform) installed the latest
The ultimate test is :
Use a 'log' filter that only write a log when called (including the =
client
ip)
Add the filter ONLY with !wlex flag and test for no 'whitelisted' ip =
and
'whitelisted' ip (either on single ip and on entire networks)
Then verify the log response
Then add aex flag to the
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : vendredi 16 f=E9vrier 2007 02:50
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: convert to msg
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, waauu wrote:
Is there a utility that will convert
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mardi 20 f=E9vrier 2007 16:28
=C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Objet : [xmail] Re: config files discussion
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Dave Henderson wrote:
Gang,
I have not used xmail
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Henri van Riel
Envoy=E9 : samedi 24 f=E9vrier 2007 08:59
=C0 : Davide Libenzi
Objet : [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?
GLST defaults to 0 as generic error code in case something=20
happen. In that
way
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Henri van Riel
Envoy=E9 : lundi 26 f=E9vrier 2007 20:16
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?
Are you sure your server or connexion is not too busy ?
I noticed the odd
-Message d'origine-
Date: 27/02/07 19:43
Objet: [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?
Hallo Ivo!
Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 4:31:59 PM, you wrote:
First, for incoming mail to You from the list, I think Davide can =
confirm if
xmailserver.org mail server have some waiting mail from the
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 01/03/07 19:55
Objet: [xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?
Hello Henri,
Your mail arrived almost exactly 2 days late.
The headers of the mail I received:
Received: from psmtp10.wxs.nl ([195.121.247.26]:40559) by
This problem is generaly caused by a time out in the pop3 session and =
as
many pop3 clients delete messages after retrieving all of them (not =
after
retreiving each, for historical reasons); if session drop for any =
reason,
then next time the pop3 client retreive all the mails.
Main causes for
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 8 mars 2007 03:46
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: SMTP-TLS bug?
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Ivo Smits wrote:
When using tail -f on XMail's SMTP log the message comes
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Brian Long
Envoy=C3=A9 : mercredi 14 mars 2007 14:13
=C3=80 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Help Troubleshooting New Installation, having
difficulties getting SMTP to work
SLOG tab says this:
Seems one CA server in the chain is not in the cert.pem
Root and Intermediate CA servers list on Internet change, so you need =
to
update on a regular basis the CA roots (and intermediate) certificates
(including revoqued CA servers) on any computer.
For Windows CryptoAPI, Microsoft provide
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Brian Long
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 14 mars 2007 16:53
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Help Troubleshooting New Installation, having
difficulties getting SMTP to work
Yes, the only mail that will
Glst on windows had a problem when its db size becomed larger than 10mb
approximatively.
So to reduce it's size, I implemented the script bellow, and programmed =
its
execution once a day (task scheduler)
(once a day because of the number of mail we receive, we are an isp =
)
This script not
After reading again all this thread, it seems to me that this is a
connectivity issue.
This connectivity issue can be on routers, servers, clients, firewalls,
proxies, filtering software or hardware (in proxy mode on client side or
firewall/proxy side), in the route ...
In case of connectivity
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Aaron Fransen
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 22 mars 2007 13:43
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Receiving Mail multiple times
Francis: You had mentioned you thought it might be connectivity,
however
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de John Kielkopf
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 22 mars 2007 16:46
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Receiving Mail multiple times
Looking at the headers, it appears Davide's list server received the=20
message
Here are the default vs my 'disabled' TLS server.tab file config :
Default values :
#SMTP-TLS 0
#EnableCTRL-TLS 1
#EnableSMTP-TLS 1
#EnablePOP3-TLS 1
All are commented out, but AFAIK values shown are the default, so by =
default
1.24 have TLS support enabled !
BUT to
Keep in mind not all final users are :
- english speaking :)
- use a 'isp' as they 'postmaster', and large isp rarely take time to
explain any error, at least free of charge.
A simple way to 'personalize' the bounces/ndr/... could be :
Each time Xmail have to send a bounce/ndr/... it searchs for
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mardi 17 avril 2007 01:49
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide,
I have had to turn on smartdnshost again.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mardi 17 avril 2007 01:53
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
=20
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mardi 17 avril 2007 09:14
=C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
And, BTW, www.optusnet.com.au
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mardi 17 avril 2007 09:38
=C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Possible it's a dns server problem
Who does
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rob Arends
Envoy=E9 : mardi 17 avril 2007 06:29
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
Davide, I think the cause is shown here:
C:\dig @ns1 optusnet.com.au mx +trace
; DiG 9.2.3
Best way is to tell your messaging client software to 'authenticate' on =
smtp
sessions.
Doing this, smtp sessions are completly independant from pop sessions.
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Chris Jones
Envoy=E9 : mardi 17 avril
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 18 avril 2007 03:56
=C0 : XMail mailing list
Objet : [xmail] Anti Virus/SPAM script for Unix ...
An XMail user sent me a link for a script he wrote:
Fine Chris :)
BUT, to help others that could have the same problem, it would be nice =
if
you can give here the solution you used 'work well' :(
The primary goal of a list like this is to help other 'bidirectionnaly'
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Davide
Just a question about smtpgw.tab and smtpfwd.tab in doc
For smtpfwd.tab file, doc says to refer to [SMTP GATEWAY CONFIGURATION]
section for additionnal parameters (NeedTLS, and OutBind actually)
For smtpgw.tab file, there is no reference to the [SMTP GATEWAY
CONFIGURATION] section
...
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de CLEMENT Francis
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 25 avril 2007 15:23
=C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Objet : [xmail] xmail doc about smtpgw.tab/smtpfwd.tab files
descriptions
Hello Davide
Just a question about
Just notice that using a 'external' relay server (even if it is your =
own
isp) can also be denies at final destination servers if the external =
relay
server is not declared in some way to be 'legitimate' to send mails of
behalf of the sending domain (I have in mind spf for example).
So the relay
This 'forwarding' issue is resolved with 'SRS' (Sender Rewriting =
Scheme)
that complements SPF.
In fact SPF allways need SRS :)
(except on final smtp servers that you are sure it's not possible to =
forward
to foreign servers that are not controlled by you)
The couple SPF + SRS can be called
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Bart Mortelmans
Envoy=E9 : vendredi 27 avril 2007 09:41
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF
SRS has a couple of problems, which make me assume that it's not going =
to
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Bart Mortelmans
Envoy=E9 : vendredi 27 avril 2007 11:17
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF
Thanks for clearing that out!
Then my next question would be: is there
Hello Davide and list :
I upgraded to 1.25pre09 from 1.24 to test new 'dns' resolver in xmail.
Here is a report from xmail 1.25pre09 that I never get with 1.24 for the
same destination domain :
===
[00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[Recipient domain
haworth.com does
See section SMTP CLIENT AUTHENTICATION in xmail doc to do outgoing =
AUTH
As noted :
If your 'relayer' host server have the name
thegoodrelayserver.somegoodisp.com then added a file named
'thegoodrelayserver.somegoodisp.com.tab' in mailroot/userauth/smtp
subdirectory and in this file set the
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Date: 27/04/07 17:51
Objet: [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS / Don't use SPF
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Davide wrote a perl filter for spf (smtp receiver side), but :
No it did not. I also stopped using
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Edmonds, J.B.
Envoy=E9 : mardi 1 mai 2007 17:51
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS
Thanks for the reply. Haven't thought through it completely, your
suggestion might be a nice Xmail
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 9 mai 2007 07:29
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: xmail on 64 bit Windows
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Wim Verveen wrote:
Interesting, it does start now. Haven't
Simple :)
Add a filter-in script that will test on sender domain, then if ok =
change
the mail content (keep in mind to change on the multiple versions of =
the
mail in a multipart-mime mail, like text-plain, html, ...)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
On W2K sp4
Using 1.25pre09 WITH smartdnshost for some spool files I have this error,
but it seems that in all cases (but not sure ...), second auto rsnd retry
go to the destination without problems (so it's not a real problem if second
try is ok, but it's strange ...)
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de CLEMENT Francis
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 9 mai 2007 12:18
=C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Objet : [xmail] Another DNS question about 1.25pre09 not in 1.24
On W2K sp4
Using 1.25pre09 WITH smartdnshost for some
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Ivo Smits
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 9 mai 2007 17:35
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Invalid command 'forward' in mailproc: email dropped?
Hello,
I've put an invalid command (forward, instead of
You make it sound simple, but im afraid a need a little more=20
hand holding.
Also I may not be reading you correctly. I want all of our=20
outbound emails
from our domain, to be stamped with an internet security=20
statement at the
bottom of the email.
On 5/9/07, CLEMENT Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : mercredi 9 mai 2007 22:09
=C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Objet : [xmail] Re: Another DNS question about 1.25pre09 not in 1.24
On Wed, 9 May 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
=20
On W2K
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Edmonds, J.B.
Envoy=E9 : vendredi 11 mai 2007 15:06
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] SMTPGW and SMTPFWD
I am wondering if there is a way to tell if xmail is actually=20
processing
correctly via
First strange think is that the file have not the header automaticaly added
by xmail (Received : ...)
Normaly the file will have original mail data content + xmail header added
at top of it.
Any av running ?
Any post-data or filter-in changing the file ?
From the file original creation date/time
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de XTechie
Envoy=E9 : samedi 19 mai 2007 20:30
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Bug with XMail, Kind Attn: Davide.
That of course is strange. I cant imagine the scenario where=20
that would have
Sure Yes you can :)
Hack the xmail open-source code :)
In current xmail code, nothing provided to do this.
Can I response with another question ?
Why do you want xmail to write these infos in a Received : header ?
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 24 mai 2007 12:58
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Cipher/protcol in Received:-Tag
Sure Yes you can :)
Hack the xmail open-source code :)
In current xmail
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : vendredi 25 mai 2007 02:54
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Strange error after upgrade
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Davide, I think so because
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Edinilson - ATINET
Envoy=E9 : vendredi 25 mai 2007 16:02
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Strange error after upgrade
OK, thanks Davide and Clement.
I will catalog some logs (smtp and slog)
Hello Davide
Doc doesn't explain the resulting value of the RFROM macro when the sender
IS NOT local.
Doc says only the sender of the message resolved to the real account, when
possible (alias resolution)
So when not possible what is the macro result ? empty string ?
I ask this to create a
If you can send the EHLO command from outside and receive mail =
correctly
except from gmail, then it seems it is not a server or firewall problem =
is
none changed in any way (no update, ...)
You could try to set some tcp dump/analysis between the zyxel firewall =
and
the modem and between the
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Ivo Smits
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 12 juillet 2007 14:11
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: problem with gmail
Maybe glst is dropping the connection when google doesn't=20
expect it to be=20
dropped..
.
---
What the heck do they mean by this? Xmail doesn't support callback
verification, does it?
Matic
CLEMENT Francis pravi:
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la
Using last Davide Glst version (0.25) fine here.
Sometimes a specific server or isp group of servers to exclude due to =
badly
configured setups (not retrying at all) or using another server for the
second (and last :( ) retry.
Except in start period using glst (6 months here, time to find the
IMOO, reducing to minimum infos these responses will probably increase =
the
number of attacks, as the guy will try any know security holes for all
existing mail servers softwares.
In any case, changing the server greating/helo/ehlo/... contain will =
not
help you in any manners to secure your
Strange ...
Never seens xmail doing that ...
Do you have any filter installed on xmail side ?
Do you have any AV software installed on xmail and/or local =
sender/receiver
users pc ?
Do you have any filtering firewall software/hardware in the way from =
smtp
sending users to xmail ?
Do you have
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 30 ao=FBt 2007 20:52
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Filters dont seem to fire
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Vinny Wadding wrote:
Ahhh ok! =20
Is there any way of
Some simultaneous access to some others files or ressources from the =
script
?
In mind some conflict when accessing same ressource.
Can you confirm that when the problem arrivies, the script is not =
started at
all by xmail ?
To confirm, make a little change in the script to first write
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Madhu
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 13 septembre 2007 07:48
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Filter to Delete Emails by size
Hi,
Anyone can help me a scheme to delete incoming mails that are=20
lesser than a
Hello Davide
For security reasons, we would force all of our customers to use AUTH during
outgoing smtp transactions to enable relay on our xmail server. Actually any
Outlook/OutlookExpress/Thunderbird/... client works fine using AUTH method.
On customers sites using servers we use the client ip
2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hello Davide
=20
For security reasons, we would force all of our customers to=20
use AUTH during
outgoing smtp transactions to enable relay on our xmail=20
server. Actually any
Outlook/OutlookExpress/Thunderbird/... client works fine=20
using AUTH method
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Date: 19/09/07 17:01
Objet: [xmail] Re: Exchange Server 2003 smtp auth login problem when
connecting as c lient to xmail server
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Cool :)
Will be in 1.25pre17 ?
pre17
I missed pre17 ?!?
oups :)
My fault. It's announcement was hidden in anothe thread.
- Davide
No problem, Davide, a search gave me the response :)
Any idea for pre18 availability correcting this auth issue ?
Thanks in advance
Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Harald
For sure the discussion in xmailforum exactly reports the exchange (any =
some
others ?)/xmail auth problem
For this problem I will try asap pre18
I think Oliver's problem was with ssl, not the auth problem :)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Davide, I have this phenomenous :
Destination domain : favard-jacmin.com
Dnsreport :
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=favard-jacqmin.comtoken=1
06035b571c9a77418f35c742eaf9019
- As reported all dns/soa/ns are ok
- the domain exist
- the domain have no MX
- the domain have
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Davide Libenzi
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 27 septembre 2007 23:34
=C0 : 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Objet : [xmail] Re: Another xmail dns resolver problem ?
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Its like sending
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Fabian Cenedese
Envoy=E9 : mardi 2 octobre 2007 10:37
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Filter POP'd messages only once
Have you looked at the mailproc.tab filter command?
Yes. But it's
It seems it is the same question as Fabian Cenedese thread :)
Filter POP'd messages only once
It could be advisable to read it and continue discussion there ;)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Filip Supera
Envoy=E9 : mardi 2
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Fabian Cenedese
Envoy=E9 : mardi 2 octobre 2007 17:40
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Filter POP'd messages only once
At 17:21 02.10.2007 +0200, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
No, I didn't speak
I have a stock V1.24 out of the box -- only filter installed is xbmf.c.
Never heard about xbmf !?!?
No link in xmailserver.org home page in available tools :/
I missed somethink usefull ?
Davide, what is the purpose of this filter ?
Thanks
Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
://www.atinet.com.br
- Original Message -=20
From: CLEMENT Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Monday, 8 de October de 2007 09:20
Subject: [xmail] Re: Too many '551 Server access forbidden by your IP'
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Rob
I'm sure you allready checked the settings bellow, but here on the list =
we
don't know, so let us know :) and a second check is allways good :)
Did you check directories and files security access on xmailroot =
directory
and the windows temp directory (see TEMP environment variable to
A network capture can confirm 100% if the client tryed to auth or not.
Does the problem exist for any of your customers that auth or only some =
of
them ?
In this last case, does they have the same av ? same version ? same =
update
version ? and can you ask them to try to temporarly disabling
Hello Davide
Just missed :/ to tell you that pre18 (and pre19 too) resolved smtp Auth
Login problem with 'initial optional parameter' :)
Thanks a lot Davide
Francis
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help:
Hello Davide
I have read another time xmail server doc to find some info for spammers.tab
file and found that some clarification are needed for optional parameter
code=.
As specified in doc :
Currently supported parameters are:
code
Specify the rejection code for
Its not an os limit, more a 'process stack size' problem
This problem is not OS dependent (even if the max number of threads =
could be
different from one to another)
Xmail uses a one thread per connection model so the only think to do is =
to=20
recompile xmail and re-link with stack size
Hello Davide
I have a request about per IP/PORT couple :-)
I have a problem setting an xmail server on a server with only one IP.
Due to some French ISP blocking outgoing port 25, I have to open a new
receiving smtp port (587 mua-mta) to help external users continue to use
they how server (and
PS : Will you implement 'centralized' configuration in server.tab for all
options actually on cmd line in v2 ?
This will simplify xmail config when changing ip and/or port numbers and
configurations :-)
It's an old request but we never get your opinion about this
'simplification' ;-)
If
201 - 300 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
