make smart collections by
type (say just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has
that info for each entry in it's database.
--
--
This message is sent to you because you
I vote for it as well.
On May 20, 2008, at 9:25 AM, John wrote:
I vote for that feature.
On May 19, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Phil Emery wrote:
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ
I vote for that feature.
On May 19, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Phil Emery wrote:
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has
that info for each entry in it's database
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has
that info for each entry in it's database
On 5/19/08 at 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Emery) wrote:
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has
that info for each entry in it's database.
The factory default
Bill - good question and the answer becomes more complex as our
ability to search on tags becomes more complex. A tag collection with
one tag item or a multiple search involving AND it would be pretty
easy to alert the user to the definition and offer to append the
collection tags, change
On 5 May 2008, at 16:45, Bill Rowe wrote:
What would happen if the tag collection had several tags associated
with it? Would you assign all of the available tags to an item
dragged to that collection?
That's exactly what I'd expect it to do, I don't see what the problem
is. For example,
I like this idea alot.
I think that it would be natural to expect either that if you drag an
item
into a tag collection, it would be automatically tagged as to fit in
that
collection.
--
--
This message is sent to you because you
I've searched the archives, but I cannot find anything addressing
this. I'm currently evaluating yojimbo, and I was wondering if it was
possible to create nested collections. Seems that if the left hand
section stays flat, that it can get unwieldy pretty quickly
--
John Sturgeon
In Yojimbo I can see what collections an item is in with the inspector
(but this doesn't work for smart collections or built-in collections).
It would be nice if Yojimbo implemented the behavior (or something
similar) that Address Book uses for collections: pressing the option
key will highlight
On Oct 29, 2007, at 10:08 PM, Rhet Turnbull wrote:
It would also be nice for Command-I to open the Inspector when in
the main view of Yojimbo.
Command-I is the keyboard shortcut for Italic in the Font Style
menu, as is customary for applications which support styled text
editing.
You
Collections Serial Numbers
means that you can add/delete a folder? Normally, a checkmark is used
for an option, such as Bold on or off and not for a folder here or
not here. Typically, such commands are under the
New/Open/Close/Delete divisions, are they not?
You know, a simple DELETE/REMOVE
At 6:20 PM +0200 7/21/07, Jan Erik Moström wrote:
tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07-07-21 11:38
How do you remove default Collections, such as
Serial Numbers and Passwords -- I never use
them and they just take up Collection space.
Select which ones you want to show using the
cog wheel
At 1:42 PM +0100 7/22/07, Richard Wayman wrote:
Um, at the risk of sounding patronising, how about:
View Smart Collections Serial Numbers
View Smart Collections Passwords
Looking through the menus takes less time than posting to the list...
Rich
Rich:
Exactly -- so why did I
Hi:
How do you remove default Collections, such as Serial Numbers and
Passwords -- I never use them and they just take up Collection
space.
Thanks,
tedd
--
---
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07-07-21 11:38
How do you remove default Collections, such as Serial Numbers
and Passwords -- I never use them and they just take up
Collection space.
Select which ones you want to show using the cog wheel at the
bottom of the list.
jem
--
Jan Erik
Hello,
I have been wondering if there is a way to create a tag collection
with tags that are possible but not necessary. I've been thinking of a
'database' collection for tags like 'oracle', 'postgres', 'mysql',
'dba' and others. So it would be possible to combine notes which don't
have to have
If it was possible to use boolean terms in the tag collection
definitions, that would be pretty handy. Then you could say to collect
items tagged with 'oracle' or 'postgres' or 'mysql' or 'dba', etc.
What I do for similar situations is use generic secondary tags, such
as 'db' for database in
I'm fairly new to Yojimbo, but I've read through the FAQ and I've searched
the mailing list archives and couldn't find mention of this:
Can users create their Smart Collections based on other search criteria?
Tag Collections require me to tag the files, but I'd like to create Smart
Collections
On 6/12/07 at 6:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Conrad Albrecht-Buehler)
wrote:
I'm fairly new to Yojimbo, but I've read through the FAQ and I've
searched the mailing list archives and couldn't find mention of
this: Can users create their Smart Collections based on other search
criteria? Tag
how many tag collections/collections do other users have?
I've been looking at these answers with interest, because my use of
collections hasn't been very practical. I have three tag collections
and five collections -- which I VERY rarely use. I usually find items
by searching for Name or Tag
Niels Kobschätzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07-05-24 22:41
Only being curious but how many tag collections/collections does
other users have (especially the developers would be
interesting because they are so against having a structure
through folders or smart tag-collections in smart
tag-collections
I've cracked it.
I read academic articles in Acrobat (and mark them up with
annotations). Then I load them into Yojimbo, tagged lightly.
Then I get the 'link item' from Edit menu (stroke of genius) and
drop that into BibDesk or Voodoopad for more organised
retrieval. That way I get the best
On May 26, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Jason Davies wrote:
I read academic articles in Acrobat (and mark them up with
annotations).
Have you looked at Skim?
http://skim-app.sourceforge.net/
I used to use Acrobat for annotations, but I've found Skim to be
better. It's a much leaner application,
Some of the comments in this thread have been along the lines of
Well I can find what I'm looking for amongst my 200 Bajillion items
in moments - and, look Ma, no collections, ain't I grand. Well,
great for you, but there are other ways of reviewing data than
knowing what you want and extracting
All very amusing, but not a fair analogy in any way…
This is not a request for a new or wildly unrelated feature, I
already use YJ for browsing, it forms the majority of the way I use
it and it does so pretty well. Features such as collections and tag-
collections exist already and have
a hammer that doesn't do everything I
want it to do!
I have to admit, I find the allusion apt!
I currently have 9 tag collections and 809 items in my library. I use
Yojimbo to manage all sorts of loosely related odds and ends, but I
use folders (in the Finder) to organize more structured projects
On May 24, 2007, at 10:44 PM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote:
Only being curious but how many tag collections/collections does
other users have (especially the developers would be interesting
because they are so against having a structure through folders or
smart tag-collections in smart tag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels Kobschätzki) wrote on 5/24/07:
Only being curious but how many tag collections/collections
does other users have
17000+ items. I have 8 collections at the moment and no tag
collections. Some of my collections are temporary such as for
the duration of a project
and economics,
At present, compound searching isn't on the feature horizon, although as
we've previously mentioned, smart collections, once available, will allow
gathering items in this fashion.
Regards,
Patrick Woolsey
==
Bare Bones Software, Inc. http://www.barebones.com
P.O
I currently have 23 tag collections, 2 regular collections, and 5319
items.
All my collections (tagged and regular) are temporary with some
deleted and new ones created on a weekly basis. That's what I really
like about the tagging system: with everything tagged, I can just
create/delete
, the less I know...
-Rob
On May 24, 2007, at 6:48 PM, infrahile wrote:
At the risk of repeating earlier posts, wanting to group your
collections does not imply a yearning for hierarchy or that you
don't know how to tag search effectively, it's just a very useful
compliment to the existing
http://www.listsearch.com/Yojimbo/Message/index.lasso?811
Regards,
Patrick Woolsey / Director of Technical Services
==
Bare Bones Software, Inc.http://www.barebones.com
P.O. Box 1048, Bedford, MA 01730-1048
--
Niels Kobschätzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] sez:
Right now tag-collections only have an and-condition (matches all
of these tags), I'd like to see an or-condition (can match any of
these tags).
As we've mentioned before :-), we will be adding support for user-definable
smart collections in a future
34 matches
Mail list logo
