Re: [Zen] Other traditions

2010-09-13 Thread roloro1557
Exactly Bill! 

So much for the wests romanticising of buddhism. . . .

Artie


--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, billsm...@... wrote:

 Mayka,
 
 It’s quite an involved situation.  Too much for me to elaborate on here.
 
 I will just say that I have a real concern on whether the traditional social 
 and cultural structure of Tibet is worth saving. It involves supporting a 
 privileged religious class at the expense of the lay people.  The lay people 
 are kept uneducated and are taxed heavily - treated almost like slaves or at 
 least serfs.  Woman are kept like domestic animals.   Young boys who are 
 given to the religious class to use as orderlies are sometimes sexually 
 abused and almost always physically abused.  That's enough about that.
 
 From a Buddhist point-of-view, the Dalai Lama is adding or prolonging his 
 fellow countrymen's suffering by encouraging them in their fight for 
 independence.  I think (my opinion only) he would serve them better as a 
 Buddhist leader to help them severe their attachments to their superstitions, 
 nationhood, language and cultural identity.  It is these attachments that are 
 the root of their suffering.
 
 Again, there are just my opinions and the reason I don't have much respect 
 for the Dalai Lama.
 






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

2010-09-13 Thread roloro1557
The New Age movement (in the US at least) is also partly responsible for 
this. 

Also (at least in the US) spirituality is commoditized like everything else and 
every 10 years or so there is a new spiritual fad. In the 80's Native American 
spiritual tradition was all the rage, then in the 90's it was Celtic. . .  

I don't know what it is now because I haven't been paying any attention 
(happily).

On a broader cultural level anything Asian has been hot here in America for 
probably at least the last 20 years- art, food, spiritual, cultural ideas, etc. 
But it is all very shallow and most Americans have no real grasp of the deeper 
meanings. The label of culture vulture is very true of many if not most 
Americans in my observation.

And yes, I'm an American, just in case anyone was wondering. . . . 

Artie








Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



RE: [Zen] The Vasque Country

2010-09-13 Thread Maria Lopez
Dear Bill:
 
Thanks Bill.   I consider that the whole Spain with all its different areas 
makes from Spain a very interesting Country in all the ways as each area is 
unique and.  However the central power is highly corrupted and that is not well 
taken by the Vasque people who are with a great sense of justice and genuinity 
in thier politics.. But I don't renegate of being Spanish as well as Vasque.  I 
do love the entire Spain with all its for and against.  
 
 
Mayka
 

--- On Mon, 13/9/10, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:


From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org
Subject: RE: [Zen] The Vasque Country
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, 13 September, 2010, 3:59


  



Mayka,

Thanks for your post below. I was surprised at the post prior to that. It did 
seem out-of-character for you. This must be because you have deep feelings 
about Basque people and their struggle for an autonomous region. That is 
understandable.

As I said in a post I just sent, a knowledge of history is not necessary to 
know the current state of affairs. I'm not arguing the history, although I did 
put down some historical facts several posts ago about Tibet. I'm just saying 
that at this time Tibet does not have an independent country. They are part of 
China.

...Bill!

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Maria Lopez
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 7:23 PM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Zen] The Vasque Country

Hi Bill;

I don't like very much the way I addressed myself to you in previous post and 
would like to apologise for it. I don't know why I talked to you in such an 
unkind way. Sorry!.

I paste here a link with an small but reliable and very well explained summary 
history of the Vasque Country. Perhaps I should have started by that in 
previous post. 


http://web.jet.es/thori/cultura.htm

Thank your for your always kind ways and most of it for the sharing in the 
forum. 
Mayka



--- On Sat, 11/9/10, Maria Lopez flordel...@btinternet.com wrote:

From: Maria Lopez flordel...@btinternet.com
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, 11 September, 2010, 11:21

Bill;

Funny that an American person living in Thailand seems to know better than a 
Vasque Person, or Spanish about their own land. I strongly advice you to read 
the History but read it by well educated Spanish historians who happen to be a 
lot of more neutral while talking about history in different worldwide 
countries and not by English Spoken historians who are not very good at it. It 
seems as they find hard to face that in fact while they still were leaving 
their excrements behind in the castle corners Italy was in the renasciment. I'm 
saying this because they are not very good telling the history about any 
country and there are times that they manipulate the history too!. However, do 
as you wish it doesn't affect me much if you keep with your incorrect history 
information or not. I can only tell you that your information about the Vasque 
Country doesn't fit the real book of History of the Vasque Country. Unless you 
are saying all this because for the seek
 of the argument. 

Mayka



--- On Sat, 11/9/10, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:

From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, 11 September, 2010, 7:31

Mayka,

The Basque people occupy lands that overlap Spain and France, just as the 
Kurdish people occupy lands that overlap Iran and Turkey. Neither the Basque or 
the Kurdish people have a country of their own. 

Tibet hasn’t been an independent country since they were conquered by the 
Mongols in the 1200’s. China incorporated it as early as the 1700’s, and most 
recently punctuated their annexation in 1910. In 1950 under The Seventeen Point 
Agreement and recognized by the UN, Tibet officially recognized China’s 
sovereignty. In 1959 Tibet revolted unsuccessfully against China which resulted 
in the Dalai Lama fleeing Tibet. The UN still recognized the Seventeen Point 
Agreement and China’s sovereignty over Tibet. 

Tibet is not an independent country, it’s part of China. 

You can dislike this, think in unfair and try to wish it away, but these are 
the facts. 

…Bill! 


From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Maria Lopez
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 10:20 AM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions


Bill:

Tibet is a Country. China's invasion into Tibet and making from it a province 
are just politics. The Vasque Country as the name itself says is a Country. 
Part of the Vasque Country is in France and part is in Spain. If you would be 
going to the Vasque Country you will be seeing that is very different from 
Spain in all the ways. As a contrast , I was borne in the Vasque Country and I 
believe anyone has ever heard say that I 

RE: [Zen] Other traditions

2010-09-13 Thread Maria Lopez
My very dear Bill:
 
Things hardly ever are as they appear to be under the eyes of the ones who are 
not from that culture. 
 
 
As a kind of paralelismo: I'd like to  share some thoughts based in myself 
experience in a different land as Spain. 
 
Many years ago Spain was said to be an undeveloped country in which the 
catholic church was its only religion.  We were all very fed up and wanted to 
have a country like the rest of Europe based in freedom, etc.  We wanted to be 
part of the European Union and exchange our culture and goods with the rest of 
Europe.  We didn't wanted to be so different.  We were not realicing at the 
time that we were a poor country but a country full of joy and appreciation for 
the things that really matters in life.  A Country with a fantastic human warm, 
altruism and so much necesary human qualities that keept people united as only 
one family.  Then, one day and slowly  we achieved all that we wanted to 
achieve but in the process of all that we lost our unity as only one family, 
our joy for life,  and our altruism becomes a widower.  The Country  become 
richer, had all the technology of all advanced countries but lost its 
simplicity and all that that really
 matters in life.  It lost also its natural wisdom and exported all the 
ignorance plus suffering from foreign countries.  And as a result of the 
identity of the country was getting lost.
 
 
 
 
Mayka
 
 

--- On Mon, 13/9/10, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:


From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, 13 September, 2010, 3:59


  



Mayka,

It’s quite an involved situation. Too much for me to elaborate on here.

I will just say that I have a real concern on whether the traditional social 
and cultural structure of Tibet is worth saving. It involves supporting a 
privileged religious class at the expense of the lay people. The lay people are 
kept uneducated and are taxed heavily - treated almost like slaves or at least 
serfs. Woman are kept like domestic animals. Young boys who are given to the 
religious class to use as orderlies are sometimes sexually abused and almost 
always physically abused. That's enough about that.

From a Buddhist point-of-view, the Dalai Lama is adding or prolonging his 
fellow countrymen's suffering by encouraging them in their fight for 
independence. I think (my opinion only) he would serve them better as a 
Buddhist leader to help them severe their attachments to their superstitions, 
nationhood, language and cultural identity. It is these attachments that are 
the root of their suffering.

Again, there are just my opinions and the reason I don't have much respect for 
the Dalai Lama.

...Bill!

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Maria Lopez
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 8:08 PM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions

Bill:

Can you elaborate where do you find The Dalai Lama hipocresy?. I'm not very 
into their political issues with China. As a person I quite like The Dalai 
Lama. And this like of him has nothing to do with him being the Dalai Lama. And 
as for his dharma I wouldn't know much except that his talking is pleasant 
thought doesn't say much of new that anyone else knows already. But I like him 
and I don't think that he's an hipocrite but someone who is in a tricky 
situation. And because of that he tries his best to explore the ways of peace. 
Perhaps through that he might appear as he was an hipocrite but he's not. He's 
a man who dreams in a world where everyone is happy and all living beings are 
safe . I know, he's genuinely like this. But of course he's a human being too. 
He's not from a western culture and because of that it might be difficult to 
understand him. But he's genuine within his own culture.
Mayka

--- On Sat, 11/9/10, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:

From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, 11 September, 2010, 3:49

Jody,

The only Tibetan I've heard much from is the current Dalai Lama, and I find
his hypocrisy disappointing.

...Bill!

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jody W. Ianuzzi
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 4:15 AM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions

The impression I get is that the Buddhism practiced by the people and the
Llamas is different. The people practice a more superstitious daily
practice and the Llamas are more intellectual.

When asked if he believed in reincarnation, the Dala Lama replied that he
shared the same spiritual beliefs as the previous Dalai Lamas.

I find the honesty and humor of the Tibetans refreshing.

JODY

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5441 (20100910) __

The message was 

Re: [Zen] Rumi -- Jewels of Remembrance

2010-09-13 Thread salik888
Dear Mike

Another good question -- compelled?  To a certain extent, yes, but not 
entirely.  

In the case of Rumi and Sufis, the Beloved (Absolute)is longed for like a 
lover, and this longing is the love and the lover . . . it is a perfect 
expression.  

Of course you find this in Everyday Zen, right, or even in Bill's insistence 
that all this is just 'sitting', -- nothing special.  It is a way of bringing 
the Absolute right down into the mundane expression of the contingent -- Maya, 
Delusion, Dunya . . .

Rumi sees our origins as endlessness that has been darkened by our faulty 
conditioning -- in short we are eternity . . . he often uses the absence of the 
Beloved (not realizing)to remind the lover . . . and to take the elixir, the 
wine, and become intoxicated with eternity (Allah, Absolute, Al Dhat, Void, 
God, etc)

Of course, he was a Poet, so you have to enter into the framework through the 
eyes of a metaphysical poet.  

best wishes

Kirk

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, mike brown uerusub...@... wrote:

 Kirk,
 
 Is that greed to be united with the Beloved - or are we compelled?
 
 Mike
 
 
 
 
 
 From: salik888 novelid...@...
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Mon, 13 September, 2010 2:35:23
 Subject: [Zen] Rumi -- Jewels of Remembrance
 
   
 The Beloved has blocked every escape 
 
 
 Friends, the Beloved has blocked every escape:
 we are lame deer and He a prowling lion.
 Cornered by a fierce and bloodthirsty lion
 what is there to do but surrender?
 This Beloved, like the sun, neither sleeps nor eats:
 He makes souls sleepless and hungry,
 saying, Come, be Me, or one with Me in nature,
 so when I unveil Myself, you may behold My Face.
 And if you had not beheld it,
 how would you have become so distraught?
 You were earth, and now
 you long to be quickened with spiritual life.
 Already the Beloved has bestowed gifts
 from that world of spacelessness,
 otherwise why would your spiritual eye keep gazing there?
 
 ~~~
 
 Ay rafiqân râh-hâ-râ bast Yâr
 âhu-ye langim va U shir-e shekâr
 Joz keh taslim o rezâ ku châreh-'i
 dar kaff-e shir-e nari khun khvâreh-'i
 U na-dârad khvâb o khvor chon âftâb
 ruh-hâ-râ mi konad bi khvord o khvâb
 Keh Biyâ Man bâsh yâ ham ham khu-ye Man
 tâ be-bini dar tajalli Ru-ye Man
 Var na-didi chon chonin shaydâ shodi
 khâk budi tâleb-e ehyâ shodi
 Gar ze bi suyet na-dâdast U `alaf
 cheshm-e jânet chon be-mândast ân taraf
 
 -- Mathnawi VI: 576-581
 Version by Camille and Kabir Helminski
 Rumi: Jewels of Remembrance
 Threshold Books, 1996
 Persian transliteration courtesy of Yahyá Mona







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

2010-09-13 Thread salik888
Kristy


I look forward to hearing something about the Integralists.  I have studied 
them, particularly in relationship to Perennialism/Traditionalism (Guenon, 
Schoun, Coomaraswamy) . . . They have some connections to the Esalen Institute 
as well.

But, I will wait to see where this post goes.

best wishes

Kirk

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Kristy McClain healthypl...@... wrote:

 *chuckles*
  
 Touché..
  
 I think the current trend is known as integral Spirituality, spear-headed 
 by Andrew Cohen  and Ken Wilber. (EnlighteNext Magazine).  Sort of a 
 meta-physical, mathmatical new age movement centered on consciousness.  
 Other devotées include Barbara Marx Huibbard, Depak Chopra amd a host of 
 inter-faith leaders which include zen monks and even Gempo Roshi.
  
 I'll share more on this topic later, as Bill offered some intriguing 
 thoughts..
  
 I wish it were  a rainy day here today.  I'm ready for a season change.
  
 Kristy
 
 
 --- On Mon, 9/13/10, roloro1557 roloro1...@... wrote:
 
 
 From: roloro1557 roloro1...@...
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Monday, September 13, 2010, 1:17 AM
 
 
   
 
 
 
 The New Age movement (in the US at least) is also partly responsible for 
 this. 
 
 Also (at least in the US) spirituality is commoditized like everything else 
 and every 10 years or so there is a new spiritual fad. In the 80's Native 
 American spiritual tradition was all the rage, then in the 90's it was 
 Celtic. . . 
 
 I don't know what it is now because I haven't been paying any attention 
 (happily).
 
 On a broader cultural level anything Asian has been hot here in America for 
 probably at least the last 20 years- art, food, spiritual, cultural ideas, 
 etc. But it is all very shallow and most Americans have no real grasp of the 
 deeper meanings. The label of culture vulture is very true of many if not 
 most Americans in my observation.
 
 And yes, I'm an American, just in case anyone was wondering. . . . 
 
 Artie







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

2010-09-13 Thread Kristy McClain
*bows* to Kirk et al;)
 
I address my comments to your last paragraph  on what indeed is happening to 
zen in the west.  I am by no  means a scholar on the  topic. I offer my 
observations as I see a troublesome trend.  I  have been concerned in recent 
years about the commercialization of spiritual practices, like zen.  Retreats, 
books, CD's, other media and the internet have made  spirituality a lucative 
venture. Radio programs like Hayhouseradio.com, among many others, suggest they 
exist as a means to spread the message.  Ok, I don't have a problem  if 
people  have money or not.  But I am tired of attraction laws, and affirmations 
and chants and meditations, that propose this is a process of coercing some 
karmic force that can lead  you to enlightenment while sitting in a Rolls 
Royce, ( a-la- Louise Hays of Hayhouse).  Maybe I'm naively purist, but 
something seems fundamentally wrong to me.  
 
I am puzzled by the statement in all these books that the answer is not in a 
book, but  it still costs $24.95 to gleen this truth.  Retreat fees are 
outrageous. Omega, Spirit Rock, and the like-- all are reaping big rewards, and 
I do  indeed think it has corrupted the translation and transmission of the 
teachings and its history.
 
One other thought..
 
In the west, there has been this effort to manipulate the  dharma so as to be 
acceptable to  the westernized student mind-set and culture.  Hence, the Big 
Mind process.  While many rave over this technique, it has never worked for 
me.  It simply feels like Jungian group therapy.  I see value in the process 
for many seeking better self-awareness and coping skills in life.  
 
But I don't see how it relates to Soto, Rinzai or any other traditional 
teaching.
 
Moreover, though American myself, I am sick and tired of the needyiness  for 
self-gratification many Westerners feel they are entitled to.  A sense of 
entitlement could perhaps sum up a western mind-set.
 
Kristy
 
 
 


--- On Mon, 9/13/10, salik888 novelid...@aol.com wrote:







In the case of Americans or Westerner plundering the Tradition of Zen. I think 
that is two answers -- first, there are some who have kept up the Traditions of 
Soto and Rinzai very well, but expressing a natural sense of American 
Transcendentalism. We sort of have our own secrets and gnostics inherent in our 
experience. That is culture and the Tradition, like the differences between 
Chinese Chan and Japanese Zen. And then of course there has been those that 
have expressed an anything goes sort of Zen, or Zen and this and Zen and that. 
So, in short, I don't think Zen Buddhism is under anymore attack in America 
than Japan, at least on the esoteric level. 

I do think there is a possibility in both Japan and the West for any Tradition, 
whether that be Sufis or Zen, for it to continuously be under attack from 
Secularism and syncretism. This is post modern information age times. In some 
sense it is what is wrong at the heart of the Middle East . . . not only is 
Islam fighting the Secular West, but more importantly they are fighting 
themselves, in terms of post modern times. Technological and Western 
individualism and syncretism has made advances on their civilization 
(traditional culture)and they are having a sort of nighmarish reform that we 
are all witnessing. Trust me, it probably was not much fun in Europe for many 
during the upheaval post Reformation. 

So, in perspective Zen is alive and well. It offers a good Tradition and leans 
on its pluralistic expression. The Sufis do likewise, however they are on the 
run in Saudi Arabia and Iran, the two major power brokers in Middle Eastern 
culture. When the Sufis can practice again in Mecca, you will know that its all 
turned for the better. But in the case of Zen, and even in China, which I hear 
Buddhism is flourishing after all these years, as I said, I think the prospects 
look good.

best wishes

Kirk

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, mike brown uerusub...@... wrote:

 Kirk,
 
 The below was an interesting read. If I read it correctly. you seem to be 
 saying 
 that practioners of Zen need to adapt their practice to suit their own 
 particular cultural milieu. As someone who is living in Japan, and 
 is reminded 
 daily of the chasm between Asian/western thinking, I think I'd have to agree. 
 'Zen' is Japanese, but what is at the heart of Zen is not. The change towards 
 a 
 more western approach to Zen, however, is slow and incremental and maybe 
 that's 
 as it should be. I wonder tho, will a more western approach to Zen include 
 it as 
 'just' part of a wider, eclectic system of religious/philisophical 
 etc. study 
 and practice - or will the efficacy of Zen be diluted by such an approach 
 (the 
 traditional Japanese viewpoint).
 
 Mike  
 
 
 
 
 
 .From: salik888 novelid...@...
 To: zen_fo...@... 
 Sent: Mon, 13 September, 2010 2:28:50
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill
 
   
 

Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

2010-09-13 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
I think it is more than that.  People are shallow, sure, that's
nothing new.  But I wouldn't say that there is no change recently in
the degree of various cultures mixing around.  I had a most
interesting conversation with my Indian-born co-workers the other day
about how their parents want the grand-kids to be more traditional
than is going to be the case, and the parents just want them to be
some what Indian, but can already see the great gap between their
upbringing and their kids upbringing.

We celebrate Diwali at my work place, Chinese New Year, Superbowl
Sunday, and Christmas.  Sure, the Diwali is different than in Andhra
Pradesh, but it's not some external trendy thing US born folks are
doing - it is a gift offered from the Indian born folks for their
pleasure and for us US born folks to enjoy as well.

I think your words over-emphasize the power of commoditization - the
flower blooms among the mud after all.

My obligatory Zen joke: there is no deeper meaning in zen.  There is
just the zen meal and the zen art and the zen bulletin board.

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:17 AM, roloro1557 roloro1...@yahoo.com wrote:
 The New Age movement (in the US at least) is also partly responsible for 
 this.

 Also (at least in the US) spirituality is commoditized like everything else 
 and every 10 years or so there is a new spiritual fad. In the 80's Native 
 American spiritual tradition was all the rage, then in the 90's it was 
 Celtic. . .

 I don't know what it is now because I haven't been paying any attention 
 (happily).

 On a broader cultural level anything Asian has been hot here in America for 
 probably at least the last 20 years- art, food, spiritual, cultural ideas, 
 etc. But it is all very shallow and most Americans have no real grasp of the 
 deeper meanings. The label of culture vulture is very true of many if not 
 most Americans in my observation.

 And yes, I'm an American, just in case anyone was wondering. . . .





Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

2010-09-13 Thread Kristy McClain
Oh no...quite the reverse.
 
I think what I meant was that it is the inherent westernized values system that 
has--in my opinion, tainted the otherwise traditional teachings.  I also agree 
that mercenaries have existed since the  dawn of man.  Perhaps its not all 
bad... People who ordinarily are indifferent to anything spiritual or 
inward-bound are taking note , and signing up for all this. Time will tell 
which direction it leads..
 
*bows*
 
kristy


--- On Mon, 9/13/10, Chris Austin-Lane ch...@austin-lane.net wrote:


From: Chris Austin-Lane ch...@austin-lane.net
Subject: Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, September 13, 2010, 2:40 PM


  




Surely you aren't saying that Zen has made the US more shallow?  Quick fixes, 
the gospel of getting lots of money, and similar things have been a part of US 
culture for a long time.  I don't find them particularly useful, but it's by no 
means some recent trend in the US.  The forms now have changed as there are 
more religious traditions around, but the dynamic is not new.  


Disclaimer:  I grew up practicing Christianity down the street from PTL, Jim 
Baker's Christian emporium where it was often said that God doesn't want us 
to have tacky things.  In my book, Eckhart Tolle has a ways to go before his 
words are that far astray from the cyprus tree in the garden.  


--Chris




On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Kristy McClain healthypl...@yahoo.com wrote:









*bows* to Kirk et al;)
 
I address my comments to your last paragraph  on what indeed is happening to 
zen in the west.  I am by no  means a scholar on the  topic. I offer my 
observations as I see a troublesome trend.  I  have been concerned in recent 
years about the commercialization of spiritual practices, like zen.  Retreats, 
books, CD's, other media and the internet have made  spirituality a lucative 
venture. Radio programs like Hayhouseradio.com, among many others, suggest they 
exist as a means to spread the message.  Ok, I don't have a problem  if 
people  have money or not.  But I am tired of attraction laws, and affirmations 
and chants and meditations, that propose this is a process of coercing some 
karmic force that can lead  you to enlightenment while sitting in a Rolls 
Royce, ( a-la- Louise Hays of Hayhouse).  Maybe I'm naively purist, but 
something seems fundamentally wrong to me.  
 
I am puzzled by the statement in all these books that the answer is not in a 
book, but  it still costs $24.95 to gleen this truth.  Retreat fees are 
outrageous. Omega, Spirit Rock, and the like-- all are reaping big rewards, and 
I do  indeed think it has corrupted the translation and transmission of the 
teachings and its history.
 
One other thought..
 
In the west, there has been this effort to manipulate the  dharma so as to be 
acceptable to  the westernized student mind-set and culture.  Hence, the Big 
Mind process.  While many rave over this technique, it has never worked for 
me.  It simply feels like Jungian group therapy.  I see value in the process 
for many seeking better self-awareness and coping skills in life.  
 
But I don't see how it relates to Soto, Rinzai or any other traditional 
teaching.
 
Moreover, though American myself, I am sick and tired of the needyiness  for 
self-gratification many Westerners feel they are entitled to.  A sense of 
entitlement could perhaps sum up a western mind-set.
 
Kristy



 
 
 


--- On Mon, 9/13/10, salik888 novelid...@aol.com wrote:







In the case of Americans or Westerner plundering the Tradition of Zen. I think 
that is two answers -- first, there are some who have kept up the Traditions of 
Soto and Rinzai very well, but expressing a natural sense of American 
Transcendentalism. We sort of have our own secrets and gnostics inherent in our 
experience. That is culture and the Tradition, like the differences between 
Chinese Chan and Japanese Zen. And then of course there has been those that 
have expressed an anything goes sort of Zen, or Zen and this and Zen and that. 
So, in short, I don't think Zen Buddhism is under anymore attack in America 
than Japan, at least on the esoteric level. 

I do think there is a possibility in both Japan and the West for any Tradition, 
whether that be Sufis or Zen, for it to continuously be under attack from 
Secularism and syncretism. This is post modern information age times. In some 
sense it is what is wrong at the heart of the Middle East . . . not only is 
Islam fighting the Secular West, but more importantly they are fighting 
themselves, in terms of post modern times. Technological and Western 
individualism and syncretism has made advances on their civilization 
(traditional culture)and they are having a sort of nighmarish reform that we 
are all witnessing. Trust me, it probably was not much fun in Europe for many 
during the upheaval post Reformation. 

So, in perspective Zen is alive and well. It offers a good Tradition and 

RE: [Zen] Other traditions

2010-09-13 Thread Anthony Wu
Bill,
 
I have respect for Dalai Lama. He is erudite and smart, and knows how to 
combine western humor and eastern learning. Meanwhile I find some of his 
remarks amusing, especially when he tries to hide his independence mind behind 
his non violence proposals. He is a contradiction worth studying. As concerns 
the history of Tibet and its present implications. Your description matches 
what I read. I will leave it up to you to make comments and will read with 
interest.
 
Anthony

--- On Mon, 13/9/10, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:


From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, 13 September, 2010, 10:59 AM


  



Mayka,

It’s quite an involved situation. Too much for me to elaborate on here.

I will just say that I have a real concern on whether the traditional social 
and cultural structure of Tibet is worth saving. It involves supporting a 
privileged religious class at the expense of the lay people. The lay people are 
kept uneducated and are taxed heavily - treated almost like slaves or at least 
serfs. Woman are kept like domestic animals. Young boys who are given to the 
religious class to use as orderlies are sometimes sexually abused and almost 
always physically abused. That's enough about that.

From a Buddhist point-of-view, the Dalai Lama is adding or prolonging his 
fellow countrymen's suffering by encouraging them in their fight for 
independence. I think (my opinion only) he would serve them better as a 
Buddhist leader to help them severe their attachments to their superstitions, 
nationhood, language and cultural identity. It is these attachments that are 
the root of their suffering.

Again, there are just my opinions and the reason I don't have much respect for 
the Dalai Lama.

...Bill!

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Maria Lopez
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 8:08 PM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions

Bill:

Can you elaborate where do you find The Dalai Lama hipocresy?. I'm not very 
into their political issues with China. As a person I quite like The Dalai 
Lama. And this like of him has nothing to do with him being the Dalai Lama. And 
as for his dharma I wouldn't know much except that his talking is pleasant 
thought doesn't say much of new that anyone else knows already. But I like him 
and I don't think that he's an hipocrite but someone who is in a tricky 
situation. And because of that he tries his best to explore the ways of peace. 
Perhaps through that he might appear as he was an hipocrite but he's not. He's 
a man who dreams in a world where everyone is happy and all living beings are 
safe . I know, he's genuinely like this. But of course he's a human being too. 
He's not from a western culture and because of that it might be difficult to 
understand him. But he's genuine within his own culture.
Mayka

--- On Sat, 11/9/10, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:

From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, 11 September, 2010, 3:49

Jody,

The only Tibetan I've heard much from is the current Dalai Lama, and I find
his hypocrisy disappointing.

...Bill!

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Jody W. Ianuzzi
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 4:15 AM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions

The impression I get is that the Buddhism practiced by the people and the
Llamas is different. The people practice a more superstitious daily
practice and the Llamas are more intellectual.

When asked if he believed in reincarnation, the Dala Lama replied that he
shared the same spiritual beliefs as the previous Dalai Lamas.

I find the honesty and humor of the Tibetans refreshing.

JODY

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5441 (20100910) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5441 (20100910) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5445 (20100912) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 5445 (20100912) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com











RE: [Zen] Other traditions

2010-09-13 Thread Anthony Wu
Bill,
 
Karma is not 'something else' to take responsibility for your life. It asks you 
to take your own responsibility, without shifting it to 'something else'. You 
are thinking it in the way without knowing it.
 
Anthony

--- On Mon, 13/9/10, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:


From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, 13 September, 2010, 10:59 AM


  





Anthony,
 
What you say below about Christianity and Buddhism is true, or at least my 
understanding of their teachings also.
 
As I said in an earlier post, I don’t consider zen a sub-set or exclusively 
dependent upon Buddhism.  Sin (which requires first repenting and then  
forgiveness) is a feature of Christianity (and other religions).  Karma is a 
feature of Buddhism (and other religions).
 
The zen I practice is not based on a concept of sin or karma.  These I consider 
maya.  They are conceptualizations of dualistic concepts.  They may be very 
useful in teaching, and in giving people boundaries or rules who want someone 
or something else to take responsibility for their own life, thoughts and 
actions.
 
…Bill!
 


From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Anthony Wu
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 3:43 AM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions
 
  








Bill,

 

Look at the following difference:

Christianity asks you to finally unite with God, who can absolve you even if 
you kill or rape, while buddhism insists on independent karma that is created 
by yourself and cannot be changed by others. // Is it superficial?

 

anthony

--- On Sat, 11/9/10, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:


From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, 11 September, 2010, 10:54 AM

  


Kirk,

I liked your post below. I do think, in fact BELIEVE, that most of the 
difference we see in the disparate religions are superficial, mainly teaching 
techniques that have been developed to lead you eventually to the same place.

It is likely just my own prejudice or at least my more extensive familiarity, 
but I do think Japanese Soto Zen Buddhism has the least amount of 'fluff' and 
most straight-forward teaching techniques. This is important, because (to 
paraphrase one of your analogies below) once you reach the other shore you need 
to let go of your attachment to the boat. With most religions that is very, 
very hard to do, and in fact actively discouraged.

...Bill!

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
novelid...@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:51 AM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Other traditions

Anthony

I think you have the beginnings of something. The Tantric visualization 
approach and guidance along the lines of Llamaism could be seen as a 
counterpart to zazen path of Zen, you are using the outward (contemplation, 
meditation, etc) to reach greater inner clarity and expression . . . You could 
make the case that once a certain station is reached you are zazen, you are 
attention, the pure self, the selflessness of self. 

Once again the Sufis address this over and over again within the context of 
their teaching stories, meditation, action techniques, gatherings, poetry, etc 
-- drinking the wine and going beyond the vessel . . . same thing as gone gone 
to the other shore . . .don't need the boat anymore. 


Kirk
In a message dated 9/10/2010 2:38:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
wu...@yahoo.com.sg writes:

Bill,

I am 90% in agreement with you. There are a lot of differences between Tibetan 
Tantra and traditional Buddhism. The most significant is their attitude and 
practice on sex rituals. On the other hand, the Tantra also has a lot of 
colorful and spectacular techniques. If they help some. why not practice them 
whether or not they can be consifered Buddhism

Anthony

--- On Fri, 10/9/10, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:

From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org
Subject: RE: [Zen] Other traditions
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, 10 September, 2010, 9:47 PM

DP,

I myself don’t consider Tibetan ‘Buddhism’ actually Buddhist. I should more 
rightfully be classified as ‘Lamaism’ – with maybe some Buddhist terminology. 
It’s chock full of superstitions, gods and spirits and a lot of mysticism (and 
not just ‘chi’), the most well known of which is their belief that the Dalai 
Lama which is their ‘God-King’, and whom they believe is a reincarnation of the 
former Dalai Lama clear back to an actual ‘god’ (of Compassion).

And don’t get me started on the Dalai Lama…Bill! 
From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
DP
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 8:49 AM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Zen] Other traditions
I have a strange 

Re: [Zen] Other traditions

2010-09-13 Thread Anthony Wu
Artie,
 
What are you romanticising? Tibetan Tantra is not Buddhism, or you may call it 
renegade Buddhism. 
 
Anthony

--- On Mon, 13/9/10, roloro1557 roloro1...@yahoo.com wrote:


From: roloro1557 roloro1...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Other traditions
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, 13 September, 2010, 3:01 PM


  



Exactly Bill! 

So much for the wests romanticising of buddhism. . . .

Artie

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, billsm...@... wrote:

 Mayka,
 
 It’s quite an involved situation. Too much for me to elaborate on here.
 
 I will just say that I have a real concern on whether the traditional social 
 and cultural structure of Tibet is worth saving. It involves supporting a 
 privileged religious class at the expense of the lay people. The lay people 
 are kept uneducated and are taxed heavily - treated almost like slaves or at 
 least serfs. Woman are kept like domestic animals. Young boys who are given 
 to the religious class to use as orderlies are sometimes sexually abused and 
 almost always physically abused. That's enough about that.
 
 From a Buddhist point-of-view, the Dalai Lama is adding or prolonging his 
 fellow countrymen's suffering by encouraging them in their fight for 
 independence. I think (my opinion only) he would serve them better as a 
 Buddhist leader to help them severe their attachments to their superstitions, 
 nationhood, language and cultural identity. It is these attachments that are 
 the root of their suffering.
 
 Again, there are just my opinions and the reason I don't have much respect 
 for the Dalai Lama.
 










Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

2010-09-13 Thread Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明

 Well Bill,

If you agreed on #3, that all words are illusory, then perhaps your 
insistent denial based on your teacher's words could itself be illusory?


My teacher reminded us constantly, don't swallow my words as is.  All 
spoken, written, thinking dharma are just form.  If you experience it, 
then it is yours.  Otherwise, they are just forms.


The label of chi and karma are indeed form, but the experience of chi 
and karma requires practice, so is the experience of spirituality and 
the wisdom this practice contains.


The way is not hard, if we don't pick or choose.  Xin Xin Ming by the 
Third Patriarch.


Every way leads somewhere determined by the quieting of our 
discriminating mind.  Not just while meditating, but in every second of 
our daily lives.


BoddhiDharma also said, When we sever all external associations and 
quiet all internal murmur, then we are on the way.


Don't take my words for it.  Don't take anyone's words.  Just Experience.

With all due respect, I have said nothing,
JMJM

On 9/10/2010 7:49 PM, billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:


JMJM,

Thanks for your reply.

I've numbered your points so I can refer to them more easily.

The zen I practice, the items that seem to be the same are 3, 4, 5 and 
6; although I'd have to investigate what you mean by 3 and 6 before I 
could be 100% sure.


As you know I consider both chi and karma illusory, teaching tools at 
best and comforting superstitions at worst.


...Bill!

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jue Miao Jing Ming 
- 

Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:48 PM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

Hello Bill,

As always, thank you for your detailed explanation. Let me get some of 
our definitions listed.

1. Chi is just a medium. The wisdom it contains is the spirit.
2. We all have chi, without it we die. Some can sense it. Some don't 
care.
3. In Chan, only True Form is not illusion. Everything else is, 
including this post of mine.
4. Every practice, no matter how different, is just a bridge. Some 
longer and some shorter.

5. Some bridge enable us to help others more efficiently.
6. The end result is still the same -- liberate ourselves and others 
from sufferings.

7. Depending on our karma, our paths are shaped.
Thank you as always,
JMJM

On 9/10/2010 6:24 AM, billsm...@hhs1963.org 
mailto:BillSmart%40HHS1963.org wrote:


JMJM,

Please don't take my posts as some kind of 'official' Zen Buddhist 
position. It's not. It's my position and I'm willing to take 
responsibility for it and explain it when asked.


If y

From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jue Miao Jing Ming 
- 

Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:30 PM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

I always know that Zen and Chan are the same in description, but 
different in practice. Now I am certain the missing practice in Zen is 
the Mystic Inner Witness practice or 『秘密內證法』 in Chinese.


[Bill!] I'm not sure what the 'Mystic Inner Witness' practice is, but 
I think I can guess. It sounds like something described by many in the 
West as the 'watcher' or the 'witness'. A bodiless awareness that 
passively and exclusively observes. If it is this it is not taught in 
Japanese Renzai/Soto Zen Buddhism. I have experienced this phenomenon 
while sitting, and when I questioned my Roshi (Zen Teacher) about it 
during dokusan (private interview) I was told to just ignore it, that 
is was just maya (illusion). I did that and after a short while I 
never experienced it again.


That's the reason Zen lost its spirituality and became an everyday 
rationalization, as described by you.

[Bill!] 'Spirit' is defined by Merriam-Webster Online as:
1: an animating or vital principle held to give life to physical 
organisms

2: a supernatural being or essence
Using those definitions as a basis for 'spirituality', I think you are 
referring to #1 - which I also think you call 'chi'. Again, during my 
beginning Japanese Renzai Zen Buddhist training, and when working on 
the 'breakthrough' koan 'Mu', I was encouraged to generate 'joriki', 
which was described as a 'ball of energy, like a small fire, located 
in my 'hara' (a spot just below the navel). I was told it would help 
me build up my ability to focus and achieve the necessary 
concentration that was necessary to pass the koan. After passing 'Mu' 
I asked my Roshi about joriki and if I needed to continue to generate 
and accumulate it. He replied that it was not necessary to do that 
anymore, that it was a form of maya and that although useful as a 
teaching technique it could actually become a hindrance when doing 
Shikan taza 

Re: [Zen] Rumi -- Jewels of Remembrance

2010-09-13 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
In zen, the absolute is not Just This.   To encounter the Absolute
is not yet enlightenment.Just this is not some magic words
meaning something other than what is right in front of us.  It is ..
just ... this.

The absolute meets the relative like a box and lid - fitting together
to make a seamless reality, which is just this reality right here.

--Chris

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:26 AM, salik888 novelid...@aol.com wrote:
 Dear Mike

 Another good question -- compelled?  To a certain extent, yes, but not 
 entirely.

 In the case of Rumi and Sufis, the Beloved (Absolute)is longed for like a 
 lover, and this longing is the love and the lover . . . it is a perfect 
 expression.

 Of course you find this in Everyday Zen, right, or even in Bill's insistence 
 that all this is just 'sitting', -- nothing special.  It is a way of bringing 
 the Absolute right down into the mundane expression of the contingent -- 
 Maya, Delusion, Dunya . . .

 Rumi sees our origins as endlessness that has been darkened by our faulty 
 conditioning -- in short we are eternity . . . he often uses the absence of 
 the Beloved (not realizing)to remind the lover . . . and to take the elixir, 
 the wine, and become intoxicated with eternity (Allah, Absolute, Al Dhat, 
 Void, God, etc)

 Of course, he was a Poet, so you have to enter into the framework through the 
 eyes of a metaphysical poet.

 best wishes

 Kirk

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, mike brown uerusub...@... wrote:

 Kirk,

 Is that greed to be united with the Beloved - or are we compelled?

 Mike




 
 From: salik888 novelid...@...
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Mon, 13 September, 2010 2:35:23
 Subject: [Zen] Rumi -- Jewels of Remembrance

 Â
 The Beloved has blocked every escape
 

 Friends, the Beloved has blocked every escape:
 we are lame deer and He a prowling lion.
 Cornered by a fierce and bloodthirsty lion
 what is there to do but surrender?
 This Beloved, like the sun, neither sleeps nor eats:
 He makes souls sleepless and hungry,
 saying, Come, be Me, or one with Me in nature,
 so when I unveil Myself, you may behold My Face.
 And if you had not beheld it,
 how would you have become so distraught?
 You were earth, and now
 you long to be quickened with spiritual life.
 Already the Beloved has bestowed gifts
 from that world of spacelessness,
 otherwise why would your spiritual eye keep gazing there?

 ~~~

 Ay rafiqân râh-hâ-râ bast Yâr
 âhu-ye langim va U shir-e shekâr
 Joz keh taslim o rezâ ku châreh-'i
 dar kaff-e shir-e nari khun khvâreh-'i
 U na-dârad khvâb o khvor chon âftâb
 ruh-hâ-râ mi konad bi khvord o khvâb
 Keh Biyâ Man bâsh yâ ham ham khu-ye Man
 tâ be-bini dar tajalli Ru-ye Man
 Var na-didi chon chonin shaydâ shodi
 khâk budi tâleb-e ehyâ shodi
 Gar ze bi suyet na-dâdast U `alaf
 cheshm-e jânet chon be-mândast ân taraf

 -- Mathnawi VI: 576-581
 Version by Camille and Kabir Helminski
 Rumi: Jewels of Remembrance
 Threshold Books, 1996
 Persian transliteration courtesy of Yahyá Mona





 

 Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
 reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links








Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

2010-09-13 Thread roloro1557
Hi Kristy :-)

I'll read what Bill has to say and await your next post on the subject :-)

Artie


--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Kristy McClain healthypl...@... wrote:

 *chuckles*
  
 Touche..
  
 I think the current trend is known as integral Spirituality, spear-headed 
 by Andrew Cohen  and Ken Wilber. (EnlighteNext Magazine).  Sort of a 
 meta-physical, mathmatical new age movement centered on consciousness.  
 Other devotes include Barbara Marx Huibbard, Depak Chopra amd a host of 
 inter-faith leaders which include zen monks and even Gempo Roshi.
 
 I'll share more on this topic later, as Bill offered some intriguing 
 thoughts..
  
 I wish it were a rainy day here today. I'm ready for a season change.










Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Other traditions

2010-09-13 Thread roloro1557
Hi Anthony-

I just think the west romanticizes buddhism in general, all forms of it. But of 
course you're right, Tibetan Tantra is not buddhism. But how many westerners 
really understand that? That's part of my point. Westerners do not often grasp 
differences or details or deeper meanings when it comes to buddhism and other 
eastern spiritual practices :-(

Artie

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Anthony Wu wu...@... wrote:

 Artie,
  
 What are you romanticising? Tibetan Tantra is not Buddhism, or you may call 
 it renegade Buddhism. 







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Practical Mysticism - Evelyn Underhill

2010-09-13 Thread roloro1557
Hi Mike-

I think what you've stated below is already happening, and is precisely because 
of the deep chasm between eastern and western thinking you also mentioned.

Artie

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, mike brown uerusub...@... wrote:
 
 I wonder tho, will a more western approach to Zen include it as 
 'just' part of a wider, eclectic system of religious/philisophical etc. study 
 and practice - or will the efficacy of Zen be diluted by such an approach 
 (the 
 traditional Japanese viewpoint).
 
 Mike 






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Rumi -- Jewels of Remembrance

2010-09-13 Thread roloro1557
Maybe:

If one looks for zen in the absolute it goes into the relative, and if one 
looks for zen in the relative it goes into the absolute. . . 

???

*grin*

Artie

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Chris Austin-Lane ch...@... wrote:

 In zen, the absolute is not Just This.   To encounter the Absolute






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/