On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
On 2013-03-16 15:20, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, Kristoffer Sheather @ CloudCentral wrote:
Well, off the top of my head:
2 x Storage Heads, 4 x 10G, 256G RAM, 2 x Intel E5 CPU's
8 x 60-Bay JBOD's with 60
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Dan Swartzendruber dswa...@druber.comwrote:
I've been using it since rc13. It's been stable for me as long as you
don't
get into things like zvols and such...
Then it definitely isn't at the level of FreeBSD, and personally I would
not consider that
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Tiernan OToole lsmart...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks all! I will check out FreeNAS and see what it can do... I will also
check my RAID Card and see if it can work with JBOD... fingers crossed...
The machine has a couple internal SATA ports (think there are 2, could
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Tiernan OToole lsmart...@gmail.com wrote:
Good morning all.
My home NAS died over the weekend, and it leaves me with a lot of spare
drives (5 2Tb and 3 1Tb disks). I have a Dell Poweredge 2900 Server sitting
in the house, which has not been doing much over
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Volker A. Brandt v...@bb-c.de wrote:
Tim Cook writes:
I need something that will allow me to share files over SMB (3 if
possible), NFS, AFP (for Time Machine) and iSCSI. Ideally, i would
like something i can manage easily and something that works
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Markus,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Markus Grundmann mar...@freebsduser.eu
wrote:
I think the zfs allow|deny feature is only for filesystems. I wish me a
feature to protect the complete pool. The property is
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Markus Grundmann mar...@freebsduser.euwrote:
Hi!
My name is Markus and I living in germany. I'm new to this list and I have
a simple question
related to zfs. My favorite operating system is FreeBSD and I'm very happy
to use zfs on them.
It's possible to
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Markus Grundmann mar...@freebsduser.eu
wrote:
Hi!
My name is Markus and I living in germany. I'm new to this list and I have
a simple question
related to zfs. My favorite operating
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
On 02/21/2013 12:27 AM, Peter Wood wrote:
Will adding another vdev hurt the performance?
In general, the answer is: no. ZFS will try to balance writes to
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Feb 20, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Feb 20, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Markus Grundmann mar...@freebsduser.eu
wrote
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Why would I spend all that time and
energy participating in ANOTHER list controlled by Oracle, when
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
In the absence of any official response, I guess we just have to assume
this list will be shut down, right?
So I guess we just have to
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
That would be the logical decision, yes. Not to poke fun, but did you
really
expect an official
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 3:42 PM, cindy swearingen
cindy.swearin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Ned and Everyone,
This was new news to use too and we're just talking over some options
yesterday
afternoon so please give us a chance to regroup and provide some
alternatives.
This list will be
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
Anybody using maczfs / ZEVO? Have good or bad things to say, in terms
of reliability, performance, features?
** **
My main reason for
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Borja Marcos bor...@sarenet.es wrote:
Hello,
I'n updating Devilator, the performance data collector for Orca and
FreeBSD to include ZFS monitoring. So far I am graphing the ARC and L2ARC
size, L2ARC writes and reads, and several hit/misses data pairs.
Any
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jan 20, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Edward Harvey imaginat...@nedharvey.com
wrote:
But, by talking about it, we're just smoking pipe dreams. Cuz we all
know zfs is developmentally challenged now. But one can dream...
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:49 AM, John Baxter johnleebax...@gmail.comwrote:
We have the need to encypt our data, approximately 30TB on three ZFS
volumes under Solaris 10. The volumes currently reside on iscsi sans
connected via 10Gb/s ethernet. We have tested Solaris 11 with ZFS encrypted
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
On 2012-11-22 17:31, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Is it possible to use the ZFS Storage appliances in a similar
way, and fire up a Solaris zone (or a few) directly on the box
for general-purpose software; or to shell-script
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Trond Michelsen tron...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen tron...@gmail.com
wrote:
How can I
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen tron...@gmail.com
wrote:
When I try to replace the old drive, I get this error:
# zpool replace tank c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 c4t5000C5004DE863F2d0
cannot replace
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen tron...@gmail.com
wrote:
When I try to replace the old drive, I get this error:
# zpool replace tank
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Erik Trimble tr...@netdemons.com wrote:
Do make sure you're getting one that has the proper firmware.
Those with BIOS don't work in SPARC boxes, and those with OpenBoot don't
work in x64 stuff.
A quick Sun FC HBA search on ebay turns up a whole list of
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 10/20/2012 01:10 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net
mailto:sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 10/19/2012 09:58 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5
The built in drivers support Mpha so you're good to go.
On Friday, October 19, 2012, Christof Haemmerle wrote:
Yep i Need. 4 Gig with multipathing if possible.
On Oct 19, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms javascript:_e({},
'cvml', 't...@cook.ms'); wrote:
On Friday, October 19
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 10/19/2012 09:58 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net
mailto:sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
We have finished a beta version of the feature. A webrev for it
can be
On Friday, October 19, 2012, Christof Haemmerle wrote:
hi there,
i need to connect some old raid subsystems to a opensolaris box via fibre
channel. can you recommend any FC HBA?
thanx
__
How old? If its 1gbit you'll need a 4gb or slower hba. Qlogic would be
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:45 PM
I would suggest if you're doing a crossover between
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
Here's another one.
** **
Two identical servers are sitting side by side. They could be connected
to each other via anything (presently
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Stefan Ring stefan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:31 AM, andy thomas a...@time-domain.co.uk
wrote:
I have a ZFS filseystem and create weekly snapshots over a period of 5
weeks
called week01, week02, week03, week04 and week05 respectively. Ny
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Erik Ableson wrote:
The bigger issue you'll run into will be data sizing as a year's worth of
snapshot basically means that you're keeping a journal of every single
write that's
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
- Opprinnelig melding -
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
r...@karlsbakk.net wrote:
Also keep in mind that if you have an
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Jim Klimov [mailto:jimkli...@cos.ru]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 8:42 AM
To: Edward Ned Harvey
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] New fast hash algorithm - is it needed?
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Matt Breitbach
matth...@flash.shanje.comwrote:
So this is a point of debate that probably deserves being brought to the
floor (probably for the umpteenth time, but indulge me). I've heard from
several people that I'd consider experts that once per year
Oracle never promised anything. A leaked internal memo does not signify an
official company policy or statement.
On Apr 18, 2012 11:13 AM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Cindy Swearingen
cindy.swearin...@oracle.com wrote:
Hmmm, how come they have
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Michael Armstrong
Is there a way to quickly ascertain if my seagate/hitachi
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
You will however have an issue replacing them if one should fail. You
need
to have the same block count to replace a device, which is why I asked
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Jim,
On Jan 6, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
Hello all,
I have a new idea up for discussion.
Several RAID systems have implemented spread spare drives
in the sense that there is not an idling
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jan 5, 2012, at 6:53 AM, sol wrote:
if a bug fixed in Illumos is never reported to Oracle by a customer,
it would likely never get fixed in Solaris either
:-(
I would have liked to think that there was
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Myers Carpenter my...@maski.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Myers Carpenter my...@maski.org wrote:
I would like to pick the brains of the ZFS experts on this list: What
would you do next to try and recover this zfs pool?
I hate running across
Do you still need to do the grub install?
On Dec 15, 2011 5:40 PM, Cindy Swearingen cindy.swearin...@oracle.com
wrote:
Hi Anon,
The disk that you attach to the root pool will need an SMI label
and a slice 0.
The syntax to attach a disk to create a mirrored root pool
is like this, for
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Andrew Gabriel
andrew.gabr...@oracle.comwrote:
On 11/15/11 23:05, Anatoly wrote:
Good day,
The speed of send/recv is around 30-60 MBytes/s for initial send and
17-25 MBytes/s for incremental. I have seen lots of setups with 1 disk to
100+ disks in pool.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Mark Sandrock mark.sandr...@oracle.comwrote:
On Oct 18, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Brian Wilson wrote:
I just wanted to add something on fsck on ZFS - because for me that used
to
make ZFS 'not ready for
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote:
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:05:29 -0500, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
Doesn't a scrub do more than what
'fsck' does?
Not really. fsck will work on an offline filesystem to correct errors
and
bring it back online. Scrub
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
Every scrub I've ever done that has found an error required manual
fixing.
Every pool I've ever created has been raid-z or raid-z2, so the silent
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Peter Tribble peter.trib...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
Thanks to all that replied. I hope we may continue the discussion,
but I'm afraid the overall verdict so far is disapproval of the idea.
It is my understanding that those active in discussion considered
it either too limited
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
2011-10-14 15:53, Edward Ned Harvey пишет:
From:
zfs-discuss-bounces@**opensolaris.orgzfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org[mailto:
zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov
I guess Richard was correct
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Stu Whitefish swhitef...@yahoo.com wrote:
It seems that obtaining an Oracle support contract or a contract renewal
is equally frustrating.
I don't have any axe to grind with Oracle. I'm new to the Solaris thing and
wanted to see if it was for me.
If I was
What are the specs on the client?
On Aug 18, 2011 10:28 AM, Thomas Nau thomas@uni-ulm.de wrote:
Dear all.
We finally got all the parts for our new fileserver following several
recommendations we got over this list. We use
Dell R715, 96GB RAM, dual 8-core Opterons
1 10GE Intel dual-port
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Frank Van Damme
frank.vanda...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/6/10 Tim Cook t...@cook.ms:
While your memory may be sufficient, that cpu is sorely lacking. Is it
even
64bit? There's a reason intel couldn't give those things away in the
early
2000s and amd
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Johan Eliasson
johan.eliasson.j...@gmail.com wrote:
I replaced a smaller disk in my tank2, so now they're all 2TB. But look,
zfs still thinks it's a pool of 1.5 TB disks:
nebol@filez:~# zpool list tank2
NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.comwrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Scott Lawson
scott.law...@manukau.ac.nz wrote:
I have an interesting question that may or may not be answerable from
some
internal
ZFS semantics.
This is really standard Unix
On Jun 10, 2011 11:52 AM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
2011-06-10 18:00, Steve Gonczi пишет:
Hi Jim,
I wonder what OS version you are running?
There was a problem similar to what you are describing in earlier
versions
in the 13x kernel series.
Should not be present in the 14x
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 9:10 PM
Instant Poll : Yes/No ?
No.
Methinks the MRU/MFU balance algorithm adjustment is
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Jim Klimov j...@cos.ru wrote:
Thanks, now I have someone to interrogate, who seems to have
seen these boxes live - if you don't mind ;)
- Original Message -
From: Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, May 30, 2011 22:04
We also
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Frank Van Damme
frank.vanda...@gmail.comwrote:
Op 25-05-11 14:27, joerg.moellenk...@sun.com schreef:
Well, at first ZFS development is no standard body and at the end
everything has to be measured in compatibility to the Oracle ZFS
implementation
Why?
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
The method the IETF uses seems to be particularly immune to vendor
interference. Vendors who want to participate in defining an
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org wrote:
Over the past few months I have seen mention of FreeBSD a couple
time in regards to ZFS. My question is how stable (reliable) is ZFS on
this platform ?
This is for a home server and the reason I am asking is that
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Evaldas Auryla evaldas.aur...@edqm.euwrote:
On 05/ 6/11 07:21 PM, Brandon High wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Ray Van Dolsonrvandol...@esri.com
wrote:
We use dedupe on our VMware datastores and typically see 50% savings,
often times more. We do of
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.comwrote:
On 5/4/2011 4:14 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:55:55PM -0700, Brandon High wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Erik Trimbleerik.trim...@oracle.com
wrote:
I suspect that NetApp
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.comwrote:
On 5/4/2011 4:44 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.comwrote:
On 5/4/2011 4:14 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:55:55PM -0700, Brandon High
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Erik Trimble
ZFS's problem is that it needs ALL the resouces for EACH pool ALL
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson
Are any of you out there using dedupe ZFS file systems to store
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 08:56 +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
On 04/10/11 05:41 AM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
I see your point, but you also have to understand that sometimes too
many helpers/opinions are a bad thing. There is
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to run both CIFS and NFS on one file system over ZFS?
Thanks.
Fred
Yes, but managing permissions in that scenario is generally a nightmare. If
you're using NFSv4 with AD integration, it's a
2011/3/12 Fred Liu fred_...@issi.com
Tim,
Thanks.
Is there a mapping mechanism like what DataOnTap does to map the
permission/acl between NIS/LDAP and AD?
Thanks.
Fred
*From:* Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms]
*Sent:* 星期日, 三月 13, 2011 9:53
*To:* Fred Liu
*Cc:* zfs-discuss
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.netwrote:
In 2007 I bought 6 WD1600JS 160GB sata disks and used 4 to create a raidz
storage pool and then shelved the other two for spares. One of the disks
failed last night so I shut down the server and replaced it with a
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
On 01/ 3/11 05:08 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
On 12/26/10 05:40 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com
wrote:
There are more people outside of Oracle
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.com wrote:
On 01/ 4/11 09:15 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Garrett D'Amore garr...@nexenta.comwrote:
On 01/ 3/11 05:08 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
On 12/26/10 05:40 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
On Sat, Dec
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling
And people should note that Netapp filed their patents
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.comwrote:
On 12/25/2010 6:25 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Schilling
And people should note that Netapp filed their
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Richard Elling
richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:05 AM, Deano wrote:
The question therefore is, is there room in the software implementation to
achieve performance and reliability numbers similar to expensive drives
whilst using relative
Just boot off a live cd, import the pool, and swap it that way.
I'm guessing you havent changed your failmode to continue?
On Dec 20, 2010 10:48 AM, Albert Frenz y...@zockbar.de wrote:
hi there,
i got freenas installed with a raidz1 pool of 3 disks. one of them now
failed and it gives me
You have to have a support contract to download BIOS and firmware now.
On Dec 19, 2010 12:29 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
I realize this is off-topic, but Oracle has completely
screwed up the support site from Sun. I figured someone
here would know how to obtain
Sun Fire X2100 M2
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Ian D rewar...@hotmail.com wrote:
Another question: all those disks are on Dell MD1000 JBODs (11 of them)
and we have 12 SAS ports on three LSI 9200-16e HBAs. Is there any point
connecting each JBOD on a separate port or is it ok cascading them in groups
of
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Ian D rewar...@hotmail.com wrote:
The answer really depends on what you want to do with
pool(s). You'll
have to provide more information.
Get the maximum of very random IOPS I get can out of those drives for
database usage.
--
Random IOPS won't max
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Linder, Doug
doug.lin...@merchantlink.comwrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
The reason for not being able to use ZFS under Linux is not the license
used by ZFS but the missing will for integration.
Several lawyers explained already why adding ZFS to the Linux
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Chris Mosetick cmoset...@gmail.com wrote:
I have found this post from Mike La Spina to be very detailed covering this
topic, yet I could not seem to get it to work right on my first hasty
attempt a while back. Let me know if you have success, or adjustments
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Edward Ned Harvey opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com
wrote:
Problem is... Oracle is now the only company in the world who's immune
to netapp lawsuit over ZFS. Even if IBM and Dell
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Tim Cook t...@cook.ms wrote:
I don't believe that there is a significant risk as the NetApp patents
are
invalid because of prior art.
You are not a court of law, and that statement has
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
It's been a while since I last heard anybody say anything about this.
What's the latest version of publicly
released ZFS? Has oracle made it closed-source
It's based on a jumper on most new drives.
On Dec 6, 2010 8:41 PM, taemun tae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 December 2010 13:25, Brandon High bh...@freaks.com wrote:
There shouldn't be any problems using a 3TB drive with Solaris, so
long as you're using a 64-bit kernel. Recent versions of zfs
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.netwrote:
Hi all
I have installed a new server with 77 2TB drives in 11 7-drive RAIDz2
VDEVs, all on WD Black drives. Now, it seems two of these drives were bad,
one of them had a bunch of errors, the other was very slow.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Krunal Desai mov...@gmail.com wrote:
There are problems with Sandforce controllers, according to forum posts.
Buggy firmware. And in practice, Sandforce is far below it's theoretical
values. I expect Intel to have fewer problems.
I believe it's more the
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
There are problems with Sandforce controllers, according to forum posts.
Buggy firmware. And in practice, Sandforce is far below it's theoretical
values. I expect Intel to have fewer problems.
According to
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:42 AM, David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:
On Nov 27, 2010, at 16:14, Tim Cook wrote:
You don't need drivers for any SATA based SSD. It shows up as a standard
hard drive and plugs into a standard SATA port. By the time the G3 Intel
drive is out, the next gen
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Christopher George cgeo...@ddrdrive.comwrote:
I haven't had a chance to test a Vertex 2 PRO against my 2 EX, and I'd
be interested if anyone else has.
I recently presented at the OpenStorage Summit 2010 and compared
exactly the three devices you mention in
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
A noob question:
These drives that people talk about, can you use them as a system disc too?
Install Solaris 11 Express on them? Or can you only use them as a L2ARC or
Zil?
--
They're a standard SATA hard
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
Your system drive on a Solaris system generally doesn't see enough I/O
activity to require the kind of IOPS you can get out of most modern SSD's.
My system drive sees a lot of activity, to the degree
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Christopher George cgeo...@ddrdrive.comwrote:
Why would you disable TRIM on an SSD benchmark?
Because ZFS does *not* support TRIM, so the benchmarks
are configured to replicate actual ZIL Accelerator workloads.
If you're doing sustained high-IOPS workloads
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am waiting for the next gen Intel SSD drives, G3. They are arriving very
soon. And from what I can infer by reading here, I can use it without
issues. Solaris will recognize the Intel SDD drive without any
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.comwrote:
On 11/27/2010 6:50 PM, Christopher George wrote:
Furthermore, I don't think 1 hour sustained is a very accurate
benchmark.
Most workloads are bursty in nature.
The IOPS degradation is additive, the length of the
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Jim Dunham james.dun...@oracle.com wrote:
Tim,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Jim Dunham james.dun...@oracle.comwrote:
sridhar,
I have done the following (which is required for my case)
Created a zpool (smpool) on a device/LUN from an array (IBM
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.comwrote:
On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Rthoreau r7h0...@att.net wrote:
I just think that some people might need that little
extra nudge that a few graphs and test would provide. If it happens to
also come with a few
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:56 AM, Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
tc == Tim Cook t...@cook.ms writes:
tc Channeling Ethernet will not make it any faster. Each
tc individual connection will be limited to 1gbit. iSCSI with
tc mpxio may work, nfs will not.
well...probably you
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Jim Dunham james.dun...@oracle.comwrote:
sridhar,
I have done the following (which is required for my case)
Created a zpool (smpool) on a device/LUN from an array (IBM 6K) on host1
created a array level snapshot of the device using dscli to another
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.comwrote:
On 11/13/2010 1:06 PM, Khushil Dep wrote:
Think those might have been the thumper screen shots? Take a look at
nexentastor
On 13 Nov 2010 20:12, Brad Henderson b...@cybernetiksolutions.com
wrote:
I am new to
Channeling Ethernet will not make it any faster. Each individual connection
will be limited to 1gbit. iSCSI with mpxio may work, nfs will not.
On Nov 12, 2010 9:26 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:03:08AM -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Since combining ZFS
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Peter Taps ptr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Folks,
From zfs documentation, it appears that a vdev can be built from more
vdevs. That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrored vdevs,
and a mirror can be built across a few raidz vdevs.
Is my
1 - 100 of 408 matches
Mail list logo
