@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Parallel mount question
Hello Vladi,
Yes you can use LOFS to all your zones to share the file system
providing r/w access. I would even say that this is your BEST option.
NFS mount in your local zones of a file system shared by the global zone
is absolutely
Le 2 juil. 09 à 15:46, Yanakiev, Vladimir a écrit :
After removing NFS, we got yet another corruption - I just heard they
use Samba on this file system. So, let me ask the question - Samba is
supported in zone, running on LOFS - is this correct?
Samba is user-land.
AFAIK any userland tasks
9:50 AM
To: Zones discuss
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Parallel mount question
Le 2 juil. 09 à 15:46, Yanakiev, Vladimir a écrit :
After removing NFS, we got yet another corruption - I just heard they
use Samba on this file system. So, let me ask the question - Samba is
supported in zone
Le 2 juil. 09 à 16:47, Yanakiev, Vladimir a écrit :
What about /dev/smb? Will it be created in the zone during install,
or we have to use mknod for it? To my memories, /dev/ is read only
in the zone. Also, what will happen, if /dev/smb is simply not there?
Hu ? What's that ?
Did you see
...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:zones-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Dorfsman
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:58 AM
To: Zones discuss
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Parallel mount question
Le 2 juil. 09 à 16:47, Yanakiev, Vladimir a écrit :
What about /dev/smb? Will it be created in the zone
William Roche wrote:
Now about the automounter, I share Nico's point of view, but as far as
I
know nothing like that already exist, and No, the automounter or a
mount
request isn't 'clever' enough (or customized enough) yet to handle NFS
data shared by the global zone and translate the mount
Glenn Faden wrote:
Well, it doesn't have to be possible. Instead it should be possible to
have the mount(2) syscall detect the loopback NFS and convert it into a
lofs mount if, say, a flag is set in the arguments, or even by default.
I've thought about doing this in the past, but wasn't
Moore, Joe wrote:
William Roche wrote:
Now about the automounter, I share Nico's point of view, but as far as
I
know nothing like that already exist, and No, the automounter or a
mount
request isn't 'clever' enough (or customized enough) yet to handle NFS
data shared by the global zone and
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:13:34AM -0400, Moore, Joe wrote:
The global zone could be the one running automount. Since it knows
what host is local, it'll convert the nfs mounts to lofs
automagically.
For each zone, add the zone's automount entries to
global:/etc/auto_master as
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:13 -0400, Moore, Joe wrote:
William Roche wrote:
Now about the automounter, I share Nico's point of view, but as far as
I
know nothing like that already exist, and No, the automounter or a
mount
request isn't 'clever' enough (or customized enough) yet to handle
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 10:55 -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:13:34AM -0400, Moore, Joe wrote:
The global zone could be the one running automount. Since it knows
what host is local, it'll convert the nfs mounts to lofs
automagically.
For each zone, add the
Le 30 juin 09 à 16:13, Moore, Joe a écrit :
William Roche wrote:
Now about the automounter, I share Nico's point of view, but as far
as
I
know nothing like that already exist, and No, the automounter or a
mount
request isn't 'clever' enough (or customized enough) yet to handle
NFS
data
Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
Le 30 juin 09 à 16:13, Moore, Joe a écrit :
William Roche wrote:
Now about the automounter, I share Nico's point of view, but as far as
I
know nothing like that already exist, and No, the automounter or a
mount
request isn't 'clever' enough (or customized enough) yet
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 12:58 -0700, Glenn Faden wrote:
This should be added to the FAQ !
As already said by others, it's not perfect, as it should be set up in
the global zone, but it's really better, better, better, better than
the current answer.
Doesn't work.
That's what I thought
Le 30 juin 09 à 21:58, Glenn Faden a écrit :
Excellent !
Sorry...
Makes me angry.
This should be added to the FAQ !
As already said by others, it's not perfect, as it should be set up
in the global zone, but it's really better, better, better, better
than the current answer.
Need a help with a problem. We have VxFS file system, created in a
global zone, and mounted under non-global zone as LOFS. Later, two new
zones were created on the same server, that needed access to the very
same file system. Someone decided to NFS-shareout this file system from
the global zone,
Hello Vladi,
Yes you can use LOFS to all your zones to share the file system
providing r/w access. I would even say that this is your BEST option.
NFS mount in your local zones of a file system shared by the global zone
is absolutely not supported (including autofs access of course).
HTH,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:00:28PM +0200, William Roche wrote:
Hello Vladi,
Yes you can use LOFS to all your zones to share the file system providing
r/w access. I would even say that this is your BEST option.
NFS mount in your local zones of a file system shared by the global zone is
Steve Lawrence wrote:
I think each zone's automounter is smart enough to use lofs instead of nfs for
mounts from a non-global to a global zone.
Please explain how this is possible. How can the automounter convert an
nfs specification of a global zone pathname into a pathname which can be
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:31:20AM -0700, Glenn Faden wrote:
Steve Lawrence wrote:
I think each zone's automounter is smart enough to use lofs instead of nfs
for
mounts from a non-global to a global zone.
Please explain how this is possible. How can the automounter convert an
nfs
29, 2009 2:00 PM
To: Yanakiev, Vladimir
Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Parallel mount question
Hello Vladi,
Yes you can use LOFS to all your zones to share the file system
providing r/w access. I would even say that this is your BEST option.
NFS mount in your
On Jun 29, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Glenn Faden glenn.fa...@sun.com wrote:
Steve Lawrence wrote:
I think each zone's automounter is smart enough to use lofs instead
of nfs for
mounts from a non-global to a global zone.
Please explain how this is possible. How can the automounter convert
an
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:31:20AM -0700, Glenn Faden wrote:
Steve Lawrence wrote:
I think each zone's automounter is smart enough to use lofs instead of nfs
for
mounts from a non-global to a global zone.
Please explain how this is possible. How can
James Carlson wrote:
On Jun 29, 2009, at 2:31 PM, Glenn Faden glenn.fa...@sun.com wrote:
Steve Lawrence wrote:
I think each zone's automounter is smart enough to use lofs instead
of nfs for
mounts from a non-global to a global zone.
Please explain how this is possible. How can the
24 matches
Mail list logo