EOD tomm might be a little aggressive :). Lets see if we can make it.
mahadev
On 10/15/08 12:23 PM, Patrick Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're down to 6 JIRAs for 3.0.0 of ZooKeeper, that's 95 issues resolved
out of 101 for this release! Great job everyone!!
We are on track for our
+1
mahadev
On 10/22/08 8:59 AM, Benjamin Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:29 PM
To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.0 (candidate 0)
I've
+1 .. I ran ant test and some command line testing on a quorum of 3 on a
single node.
mahadev
On 11/24/08 5:50 PM, Patrick Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1.
*** Please download, test and VOTE before the
*** vote closes EOD on Friday,
Great!! Go ahead.
mahadev
On 11/25/08 4:57 PM, Krishna Sankar (ksankar) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no one has done it, I will take a first cut at it.
|-Original Message-
|From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 3:26 PM
|To:
Hi Nitay,
We already have an open jira for this.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-241
This should be fixed in the next release.
thanks
Mahadev
On 12/8/08 12:08 AM, Nitay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm working on integrating ZooKeeper into HBase.
I've become a
Hi all,
I needed to get quotas in zookeeper 3.2.0 and wanted to see if delaying
the release by 2-3 weeks is ok with everyone?
Here is the jira for it -
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-231
Please respond if you have any issues with the delay.
thanks
mahadev
That was release 3.1 and not 3.2 :)
mahadev
On 1/15/09 4:26 PM, Mahadev Konar maha...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hi all,
I needed to get quotas in zookeeper 3.2.0 and wanted to see if delaying
the release by 2-3 weeks is ok with everyone?
Here is the jira for it -
http://issues.apache.org
From: Mahadev Konar [maha...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:32 PM
To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: zookeeper-u...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Delaying 3.1 release by 2 to 3 weeks?
That was release 3.1 and not 3.2 :)
mahadev
On 1/15/09 4:26 PM
delay. it would be good to try out quotas for a bit before
we do the release. quotas are also a key part of the release. 3 weeks
seem a little long though.
ben From: Mahadev Konar
[maha...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:32 PM
these methods are
already there in that revision. Is there any patch available that can be
applied to 3.0.1 directly? If not, I can try and use the dataDir
directly (but I guess there was a reason why it was changed).
Thank you,
Manos
Mahadev konar (JIRA) wrote:
[
https
?
Patrick
Mahadev Konar wrote:
HI Manos,
The accepting of a txn for being processed does not mean that the txn has
been accpeted by the quorum and has been applied to the quorum servers. So,
it is very much possible that one of the client changes an acl on a node and
the other client
+1 to ben's suggestion. We can go ahead with 3.1.0 and make a 3.1.1 (given
that it wasn't working in the prev releases as well)...
mahadev
On 2/10/09 6:31 PM, Benjamin Reed br...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Chris's patch is very simple and it won't be hard to put some tests in. can we
plan a bug
Hi Manos,
The number of open files allowed for a process can be changed. 1024 is
usually a very small number. You should change that to a bigger number to
enable zookeeper to run.
Ulimit -a should show you the number of open files allowed. It can be
changed using ulimit -n.
Also, the default
+1... Passes tests for c and java on my machine.
mahadev
On 3/16/09 10:55 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1, passes all my tests for both c and java.
Patrick
Stu Hood wrote:
+1
Passes our integration tests. (...which don't test the C API, which is where
the majority of
+1, the java and c tests pass on my machine.
mahadev
On 3/19/09 3:50 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
+1, compiles and tests pass for me.
-Flavio
On Mar 19, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
+1, c/java tests all pass and I also specifically verified that the
Hi Stephen,
Their an open jira for turning hadoops build into a maven build process.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-103
.
Our release engineering follows hadoop's build process and would like to
stay with hadoop core's process so that we can get their help in release
Nitay,
Thanks for sending us the info.
We have experienced such gc problem in our HDFS (hadoop file system) setups.
The gc had been quite a problem for us with the Namenode (hadoop hdfs)
process. We have seen the namenode just stalling for minutes doing garbage
collection. We currently run the
Hi andrew,
You should be able to read about leader election in the presentation at
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/ZooKeeperPresentations
Specifically the last one at UPC. It explains the leader election in the ppt
slides. We should also document it somewhere on the wiki or in our
happy to help w/ docs where I can and API/usage stuff. :-)
Thanks,
Grant
On Jun 7, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Mahadev konar (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.p
lugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mahadev konar updated
Its just that Zookeeper mostly is used in applications which are proprietary
(to Yahoo!) and so its harder to update the wiki with specifics on how it is
being used.
thanks
mahadev
On 6/8/09 7:01 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
How come Yahoo isn't listed?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009
Hi all,
I am proposing June 26 as a code freeze date for ZooKeeper release 3.2.
Please respond if you have any objections/concerns?
Here is a list of remaining jira's in 3.2.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hid
+1
Ran the tests and did some basic smoke testing.
mahadev
On 7/3/09 7:16 AM, Tom White t...@cloudera.com wrote:
+1
I checked the signature, ran the Java tests, and tried the CLI.
Cheers,
Tom
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote:
I have created a
Hi all,
There seems to have been a DNS issue with the machines that run the
ZooKeeper nightly build and patch process. The nightly build and the patch
process are not running as of now. The issue might take some time to
resolve. To run through all the tests that hudsons runs through, you can use
: RE: Unending Leader Elections in WAN deploy
Great news. Thank you Mahadev. I'll report our findings later today.
-Todd
-Original Message-
From: Mahadev Konar [mailto:maha...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 11:20 AM
To: zookeeper-u...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re
being elected (flavio
via
mahadev)
What can I do to assist you with this issue?
-Todd
-Original Message-
From: Mahadev Konar [mailto:maha...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:43 PM
To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unending Leader Elections
?
-Todd
-Original Message-
From: Mahadev Konar [mailto:maha...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:43 PM
To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unending Leader Elections in WAN deploy
Hi todd,
comments in line
On 8/4/09 12:38 PM, Todd Greenwood
Todd,
Comments in line:
On 8/5/09 12:10 PM, Todd Greenwood to...@audiencescience.com wrote:
Flavio/Patrick/Mahadev -
Thanks for your support to date. As I understand it, the sticky points
w/ respect to WAN deployments are:
1. Leader Election:
Leader elections in the WAN config (pod
HI all,
As giri mentioned, the builds are back to normal and so is the patch
process.
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/ZooKeeper/job/Zookeeper-Patch-ves
ta.apache.org/
The patches are being run against hudson, so you DO NOT need to cancel and
resubmit patches.
Thanks
mahadev
On
: Mahadev Konar [mailto:maha...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 1:47 PM
To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Optimized WAN ZooKeeper Config : Multi-Ensemble
configuration
Todd,
Comments in line:
On 8/5/09 12:10 PM, Todd Greenwood to...@audiencescience.com
+1 the tests run fine for me. Also ran a bunch of smoke tests with killing
servers and bringning them up at randome intervals. It all worked fine.
Thanks
mahadev
On 8/31/09 2:52 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
+1. I've run a number of live tests, including some cross-colo
Hi Erik,
There is no such reason for accessing variable without acess and getters.
We should not be doing that. Its good to have getters and setters.
The synchronization on DataNode is a safe lock that would prevent developers
being concerned about finer locks and maintaining them. In our
HI todd,
We did respond on zookeeper-user. Here is my response in case you didn't
see it...
HI todd,
From what I understand, you are sayin that a creator_all_acl does not work
with auth?
I tried the following with CREATOR_ALL_ACL and it seemed to work for me...
import
Hi Steve,
Can you please create a jira and upload the code to that jira for
feedback? I am guessing that you want to contribute these tests back to
zookeeper right ?
Also, do take a look at src/recipes/lock for an implementation of locks on
top of zookeeper. They have some tests as well.
Sounds good, I have created an ASF JIRA account, but it doesn't look like I
can attach a file in Step 2 of the Create Issue screen. Do I have to
create the jira first then attach the file?
Yes. Please take a look at
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/HowToContribute
On some guidelines
Hi Qian,
The explanation is little more detailed and goes into the gurantees of
ZooKeeper.
This presentation in
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/ZooKeeperPresentations
On zookeeper internals will give you some update on the theory and
guarantees of ZooKeeper. If you could read through
Hi Steven,
The most important is 4 space indentation (no tabs). Other than that, we
really don't have any specific guidelines on c code. Now that you mention
it, it would be good to have one. But as of now, we do not have one.
Thanks
mahadev
On 10/23/09 5:01 PM, Steve Cheng steve...@gmail.com
Hi all,
We are planning to make a bugfix release 3.2.2 which will include a
critical bugfix in the c client code. The jira is ZOOKEEPER-562,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-562.
If you would like some fix to be considered for this bugfix release please
feel free to post on the
+1 .. Ran ant test.
mahadev
On 11/24/09 11:22 AM, Benjamin Reed br...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
+1
Patrick Hunt wrote:
I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.1.2. This is a bug fix
release addressing just two critical issues -- see the release notes for
details.
*** Please
+1 for the release. Ran ant test and some smoke tests it worked fine.
mahadev
On 11/24/09 7:54 AM, stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
+1 Ran it in place of zk-3.2.1 in hbase context for an upload and nothing
untoward examining logs. Took a quick gander at the doc. and nothing
obviously amiss.
, Mahadev Konar wrote:
+1 .. Ran ant test.
mahadev
On 11/24/09 11:22 AM, Benjamin Reed br...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
+1
Patrick Hunt wrote:
I've created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.1.2. This is a bug
fix
release addressing just two critical issues -- see the release
notes
, Mahadev Konar wrote:
+1 for the release. Ran ant test and some smoke tests it worked fine.
mahadev
On 11/24/09 7:54 AM, stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
+1 Ran it in place of zk-3.2.1 in hbase context for an upload and
nothing
untoward examining logs. Took a quick gander at the doc
+1 I ran ant test and some smoke tests.
thanks
mahadev
On 12/8/09 2:32 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.2. This is a bug
fix release addressing 13 issues (three critical) -- see the release
notes for details.
*** Please
+1 I ran ant test and smoke tests.
Thanks
mahadev
On 12/8/09 2:30 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.1.2. This is a bug
fix release addressing three critical issues -- see the release notes
for details.
*** Please download, test
Hi Qian,
This is quite weird. Are you sure the version is 3.2.1?
If yes, please create a jira for this.
Also, can you extract the server logs for the session
ephemeralOwner: 226627854640480810
And post it on a jira? Ephemeral Owner is the session id. You can convert
the above
+1
mahadev
On 12/16/09 8:54 AM, Benjamin Reed br...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
March 10th sounds good to me.
ben
Patrick Hunt wrote:
Now that the fix releases are out we should look at nailing down a date
for 3.3.0, once we define a date we can triage the JIRA list and pare it
down to what
Hi Qian,
You can just upload the server logs to this jira and we can figure out if
there is something useful that we can use to find out what happened.
Thanks
mahadev
On 12/15/09 6:05 PM, Qian Ye yeqian@gmail.com wrote:
I have opened a jira for the issue:
Hi Andrew,
Great to see ruby bindings for zookeeper. Would you be contributing it back
to the zookeeper source tree? I am sure lots of folks would be interested in
it. Please post to the list if you have any questions regarding the api or
questions regarding how to contribute code back to the
at 08:45:13PM -0800, Mahadev Konar wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Great to see ruby bindings for zookeeper. Would you be contributing it back
to the zookeeper source tree? I am sure lots of folks would be interested in
it. Please post to the list if you have any questions regarding the api or
questions
Hi Thomas,
Its just been a legacy that we have been including source code in the
jars. We have found that sometimes folks apply patches on there own and push
there own jars to production. It just helped us debugging in such cases.
That's why its always been there. It has no connection to jmx at
Hi all,
I had been working on zookeeper-22 and found out that it needs quite a few
extensive changes. We will need to do some memory measurements to see if it
has any memory impacts or not.
Since we are targetting 3.3 release for early march, ZOOKEEPER-22 would be
hard to get into 3.3. I am
Hi Aaron,
This looks like more of a File API of java :). I think it would be useful.
It does seem useful for some kind of group membership using ZooKeeper. You
just need to be a little careful about handling watches and ephemeral nodes
with such design. How do you plan to handle it?
Thanks
HI Qian,
You are right we do have any way of handling clients dynamically so that
every server has balanced load. This requires a careful design since we
would not want client connections to keep flipping around and also maintain
stability as much as we can. We have had some discussions about it
. Is there any compromise for this issue?
thanks
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Mahadev Konar maha...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
HI Qian,
You are right we do have any way of handling clients dynamically so that
every server has balanced load. This requires a careful design since we
would
I agree with Ben here.
I think we do need sometime to get more bodies contributing to the ZooKeeper
codebase. Being a subproject of Hadoop gives us quite a few benefits like
branding/discoverability (as Pat mentioned). These benefits are important to
us given our small developer base and the
Hi Taylor,
Really glad to see that you'd like to work on the recipes. As per your
questions, comments are in lined:
- it should implement the java.util.concurrent interfaces so that the
implementation may be used by anyone already familiar with the
java.util.concurrent.* interfaces
The
Great to see this!!!
Thanks
mahadev
On 3/31/10 4:20 PM, Wim Jongman wim.jong...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
Ahmed Aadel who works at Remain Software created a Zookeeper based Discovery
provider which can be used to publish remote services in an OSGi container.
I have created a blog
Hi Prashant,
Just one more thing. It would be great if you could update the powered by
page at:
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/PoweredBy
With your usage model as well once you start using ZooKeeper.
Thanks
mahadev
On 4/14/10 10:38 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On
Good to see this
Eric, do you have an open jira for client bindings?
Thanks
mahadev
On 4/21/10 8:32 PM, Eric Hauser ewhau...@gmail.com wrote:
I submitted the Jute changes back as ZOOKEEPER-747.
Regarding contrib, I'd be happy to submit the client bindings back once I do
a bit more
Hi Alan,
It seems to work fine for me.
Can you try:
Ant clean
And then
Ant jar?
Could be possible that some classes might have been accidentally deleted!
Also, please check svn status to see if any java files are missing from the
source tree.
Thanks
mahadev
On 4/24/10 7:44 AM, Alan D.
Hi,
We are having problems with apache wiki wherein we are getting an error of
You are not allowed to do AttachFile on this page.
Whenever we try to download an attachment from
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/ZooKeeperPresentations.
As far as I remember this worked fine when I
been disabled due to a spammer earlier this week.
I don't know how soon or if we will enable file attachments again.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Mahadev Konar maha...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We are having problems with apache wiki wherein we are getting an error of
You are not allowed
+1.
Ran ant tests and some manual testing to bring up a cluster and run manual
commands on the zookeeper cluster of 1,3, 5 nodes.
Thanks
Mahadev
On 5/11/10 10:32 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1, tests pass for me, also verified that nc/zktop worked properly on a
real cluster
HI Vishal,
There is patch available for 3.3 branch which I think should apply.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12450761/ZOOKEEPER-790-3.3.
v2.patch
On the other hand its not a good idea to have run your own patched version
of ZooKeeper in production. 3.3.2 should be out by
HI Thomas,
I read through the list of issues you posted, most of them seem reasonable to
fix. The one's you have mentioned below might take quite a bit of time to fix
and again a lot of testing! (just a warning :)). It would be great if you'd
want to clean this up for 3.4. Please go ahead and
class).
Thanks
mahadev
On 8/11/10 7:40 AM, Mahadev Konar maha...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
HI Thomas,
I read through the list of issues you posted, most of them seem reasonable to
fix. The one's you have mentioned below might take quite a bit of time to fix
and again a lot of testing! (just
Hi Gustavo,
There was some talk of startTransaction(), addTransaction(), commit() kind
of api on the list.
Here is the link:
http://www.mail-archive.com/zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg08317.html
Mostly looked like this wasn¹t on our roadmap for short term, but definitely
something to
interface in the background), ASyncCallback,
Watcher
We may want to change: ClientCnxn (faktor out some things, remove dep on
ZooKeeper)
I think other classes should not be involved at all in our issues. My collegue
Patrick was so kind to fill the jira issues.
Best regards,
Thomas
Mahadev
Hi Vishal,
Thanks for picking this up. My comments are inline:
On 9/2/10 3:31 PM, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I had posted this message as a comment for ZOOKEEPER-822. I thought it might
be a good idea to give a wider attention so that it will be easier to
collect
Hi Thomas,
Sorry for my late response. Please open a jira regarding this. Is this fixed
in your netty patc hfor the client?
Htanks
mahadev
On 9/1/10 9:09 AM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote:
Hi,
I believe, that I've found a race condition in
org.apache.zookeeper.server.InvalidSnapshotTest
, stable, unstable, ..
This is quite useful but given out interfaces havent chanhged in a long time
this might not be that helpful for us.
Thanks
mahadev
On 8/31/10 3:47 PM, Mahadev Konar maha...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
There isnt any documentation on the interface tagging other than the running
Hi Thomas,
I do have that on my list. I probably will be doing it by this weekend for
sure.
Thanks
mahadev
On 9/8/10 9:16 AM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote:
Hi Ben, Mahadev,
Patrick suggested I might ask you for review on ZOOKEEPER-823. It
does some refactoring on ClientCnxn and
I just reviewed the patch. You can go ahead and commit it. I am going to run
the ant test now.
Thanks
mahadev
On 9/8/10 9:23 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Hudson trunk is currently failing due to some fd cleanup issue. Not sure if
I introduced that recently with the netty server
Hi Ngo,
If the leader fails, someone else in the quorum is elected as the leader.
You might wan to read through documentaion at:
http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.2.0/
Thanks
mahadev
On 9/14/10 6:00 PM, Ngô Văn Vĩ ngovi.se@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
if Master error. What do
+1 for moving to TLP.
Thanks for starting the vote Pat.
mahadev
On 10/13/10 2:10 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
In March of this year we discussed a request from the Apache Board, and
Hadoop PMC, that we become a TLP rather than a subproject of Hadoop:
Original discussion
Well said Vishal.
I really like the points you put forth!!!
Agree on all the points, but again, all the point you mention require
commitment from folks like you. Its a pretty hard task to test all the
corner cases of ZooKeeper. I'd expect everyone to pitch in for testing a
release. We should
immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache ZooKeeper Project:
* Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org
* Flavio Junqueira f...@apache.org
* Mahadev Konarmaha...@apache.org
* Benjamin
Hi Camille,
I am a little curious here. Does this mean you tried a single zookeeper
server with 16K clients?
Thanks
mahadev
On 10/20/10 1:07 PM, Fournier, Camille F. [Tech] camille.fourn...@gs.com
wrote:
Thanks Patrick, I'll look and see if I can figure out a clean change for this.
It was
Hi Thomas,
Could you verify this by just testing the trunk without your patch? You
might very well be right that those tests are a little flaky.
As for the hudson builds, Nigel is working on getting the patch builds for
zookeeper running. As soon as that gets fixed this flaky tests would show
Hi Vishal,
This idea (2.) had been kicked around intially by Flavio. I think he¹ll
probably chip in on the discussion. I am just curious on the whats the idea
behind your proposal? Is this to provide some kind of failure gaurantees
between a 2 node and 3 node cluster?
Thanks
mahadev
On
That¹s really nice.
mahadev
On 10/25/10 10:16 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
FYI:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the
We should start using this, I've used it for other projects and it worked
out quite well.
Patrick
This sounds great.
Thanks
mahadev
On 10/16/10 1:56 AM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote:
Benjamin Reed:
actually, the other way of doing the netty patch (since i'm scared of
merges) would be to do a refactor cleanup patch with an eye toward
netty, and then another patch to actually add
Nice to see this!
Thanks
mahadev
-- Forwarded Message
From: Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org
Reply-To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 14:39:24 -0700
To: Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org
Subject: [Hadoop Wiki] Update of ZooKeeper/ZKClientBindings by
yfinkelstein
Dear Wiki
Hi Camille,
I think definitely there is. I think a build script with a set of
requirements and a nice set of docs on how to start using it would be great.
BTW, there is a C# binding which someone wrote earlier
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/ZKClientBindings
You can take a look at that
+1 for the release.
Ran ant test and a couple of smoke tests. Create znodes and shutdown
zookeeper servers to test durability. Deleted znodes to make sure they are
deleted. Shot down servers one at a time to confirm correct behavior.
Thanks
mahadev
On 11/4/10 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt
Hi Vishal,
There are periodic pings sent from the leader to the followers.
Take a look at Leader.java:
syncedSet.add(self.getId());
synchronized (learners) {
for (LearnerHandler f : learners) {
if (f.synced()) {
Yup. This would be really nice to have. More examples and documentaiton for
them, would be really helpful for our users.
Thanks
mahadev
On 11/15/10 12:54 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
It would be great to have more examples as part of the release
artifact. Would you mind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12604996#action_12604996
]
Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-45:
do we want to create a zookeeper/site
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-38?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12607147#action_12607147
]
mahadev edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-38 at 6/22/08 10:57 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-45?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12607814#action_12607814
]
Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-45:
2) we anyway need a top level changelog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mahadev konar updated ZOOKEEPER-53:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
i just committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-38?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12611885#action_12611885
]
Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-38:
the patch looks good --- here are some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-38?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1261#action_1261
]
Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-38:
i have no intention to discuss
: server
Reporter: Mahadev konar
Assignee: Mahadev konar
Fix For: 3.0.0
I have been thinking this for a while and find that the zookeeper server code
needs some cleaning up. The server code is a little tricky/confusing to read
sometimes gievn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mahadev konar updated ZOOKEEPER-76:
---
Attachment: Zookeeper-76_1.patch
i just did this as in the patch which amkes the tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12614056#action_12614056
]
Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-76:
pats patch seems better.. +1 on pat's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12614780#action_12614780
]
Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-81:
i think the build.xml only allows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615507#action_12615507
]
Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-83:
hiram, can you list an overall set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615680#action_12615680
]
Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-84:
james,
I do not understand where you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mahadev konar reassigned ZOOKEEPER-2:
-
Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira (was: Mahadev konar)
assigning this back to flavio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615802#action_12615802
]
Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-83:
i agree with Doug on this. We never felt
1 - 100 of 1446 matches
Mail list logo
