Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
But here's the biggest news: the Refresh product, which makes life just
a little bit easier for filesystem product developers, now has an
auto-refresh feature and the ability to set up dependent products. This
means changes to your Python
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Any idea why that is?
What product are you refreshing? Maybe it's specific to the product.
An NDA'd one ;-)
Sorry, that's not a lot of help I know, but what sort of things should I be
looking for that'd cause refresh to not work
Steve Alexander wrote:
Shane's ExternalMount product is here:
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/ExternalMount
However, I couldn't find it from searching on zope.org, and it isn't
listed on Shane's zope.org page.
Oops, I forgot to get it cataloged.
Shane
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
apparently not. However, I have an idea that might solve it. Thanks
for the heads-up!
Pleasure :-)
(as a workaround we've developed the 'Pound on the Refresh button like a monkey'
technique *grinz*)
I've added logic to sort the modules
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/ZDebug
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/Refresh
Just noticed, since I installed these yesterday, the icon for the Python product
I'm developing has changed to a ZCatalog icon. I'm using refresh
Steve Alexander wrote:
Petr Knapek wrote:
I would like to know how to connect to running Zope ZODB from
a python script. I would like to have possibility to read
only objects from ZODB? Is there any possibility how to do
it when Zope application server is running and not
"Jay, Dylan" wrote:
I did a clean install (on w2k), then copied across my products and Data.fs
etc and when I restarted I got the following when I tried to access
manage_main on the root folder. Funny thing is this doesn't happen on any
other folder.
Error type: SystemError
Error value:
Andre Schubert wrote:
Hi,
since the last time i had some problems with my zope server.
The zope 2.2.4 running under linux dies unexpectly with the following
messages.
2001-02-16T01:50:08 ERROR(200) zdaemon zdaemon: Fri Feb 16 02:50:08
2001: Aiieee! 5451 exited with error code: 13
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Erik Enge writes:
I've been reading a lot of Zope code the last couple of years, but
still I really don't see any overall structure of lib/python. Is this
documented somewhere?
I find the names quite self explanatory.
Yes, I am a person that believes in self
Chris Withers wrote:
Do these two play nicely together?
If you mean to refresh the Python Scripts product, I don't know of a
reason why that wouldn't work. I just tried it and it seems to be fine.
Shane
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Withers wrote:
Hi,
I need a product with custom attribute getting code and so looked to the
BTreeFolder product for inspiration.
It implements both __getattr__ and _getOb which appear to do roughly the same
thing.
What's the difference?
_getOb() is part of the ObjectManager
Brian Lloyd wrote:
DC should encourage and then force developers to be a bit better
about documentation. I have seen product developers put up a new
product with the full amount of documentation about it being "here it
is... have fun." This certainly does not help all of those people
This looks very interesting, Phillip. I haven't downloaded the package
yet, but I read the wiki and it finally made sense once I understood the
goal (I think): TW lets you set up the class inheritance hierarchy at
runtime. In normal OO methodology, you can only extend classes. With
TW, you can
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
At 09:37 AM 3/1/01 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:
What is your vision of integrating AOP into a persistent object system?
Would one drop in an object that modifies the class loading mechanism so
that the classes come from a TW component rather than Pyth
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
At 03:53 PM 3/2/01 -0500, R. David Murray wrote:
I could be wrong, but I didn't read what Phillip wrote as saying he was
suggesting TransWarp as a player in the Module Persistence implementation,
but rather that he wanted people to see the value of TransWarp first
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Itai Tavor writes:
On Zope 2.3.0 and 2.3.1b1, the following method produces an error
when ZDebug is installed; If I remove ZDebug, it works fine.
A long time ago, there was firm evidence that ZDebug does
not play well with "sendmail" (- list archives).
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
At 12:39 PM 3/2/01 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:
This could be achieved by generating a new Python module for each portal
instance, but that would mean sys.modules would have to be pre-loaded
with the information about each portal instance and that's not the
Chris Withers wrote:
subobjects because acquisition only looks at object attributes. It
doesn't know anything about _getOb(). (And it's not a good idea to
teach it to use _getOb(); think what it would be like if a Xeon ran like
a 386...)
I remember the days when... ;-)
Seriously
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
At 10:52 AM 3/6/01 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Perhaps... but as I see it, pickling the aspect weaving information into
each object makes it harder to vary the aspect weaving after objects
have been created.
That's not what I said. *Aspect ob
"Morten W. Petersen" wrote:
Is it possible to ensure that pages are always fresh, even if it is
specified on the client side that the client should never try to
retrieve a 'fresher' page?
Send an "expiration" header with a valid date that has already passed.
This has always worked for me,
"Morten W. Petersen" wrote:
Is it possible to ensure that pages are always fresh, even if it is
specified on the client side that the client should never try to
retrieve a 'fresher' page?
Send an "expiration" header with a valid date that has already passed.
This has always worked for me,
Chris McDonough wrote:
That's one use, which is important to you. Another is to
use Emacs or Dreamweaver on a representation of, for
example, DTML methods on a filesystem, which is important to
other folks.
I think there is really only one issue nobody has been able to sort out:
do we want
I have written a proposal for the improvement of logging. It builds on
ideas proposed by Chris and Andreas at Digital Creations. It is designed
to augment Zope's enterprise-level capabilities. Please comment!
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/NewLoggingAPI
Shane
Ivo van der Wijk wrote:
I tried to ask this on the standard zope list, but noone seemed to know
anything about it. Perhaps you do?
We provide zope hosting, both folder based (where people have access
to their own folder, mapped to a domain, and no access to the zope
server / source / var /
Here is a script that lets you browse *everything* in your ZODB through a
quick GUI client. I was looking at wxPython the other day and this idea
occurred to me. It worked amazingly well.
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/pyTree
(BTW you can't hold me responsible if your password slips out
Chris Withers wrote:
will you be releasing a new version of BTreeFolder that makes use of the new
funky BTrees at any stage?
We've done some work on it; in fact Jim came up with a bold new idea
that makes them inherently faster. Now to find the time. :-)
Shane
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Now, what *I*'d like to know is what the bold new idea is, since it
sounds like it's something even newer than the
forward-chained-buckets-plus-conflict-resolution stuff that's already been
released.
It's simple, really. BTreeFolders play havoc with acquisition because
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
However, purely random IDs would cause all the buckets to be loaded in
memory all the time, so Jim's third idea was to have each client
increment sequentially from a random ID and move to a new random ID if
conflicts ever occur.
Can't
On Tue, 1 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
This notice only applies to developers who are following the bleeding
edge of Zope, the CVS trunk. It does not apply if you downloaded Zope
from a web site.
As a broader issue, what's the story with bugfixes in the 2.3
Fred Wilson Horch wrote:
The problem that happens on import is a KeyError on line 194 of this bit
of code:
lines 192-197 of lib/python/ZODB/ExportImport.py
ooid=h[:8]
if oids:
oid=oids[ooid]
if type(oid) is
Kapil (and others),
Although very sketchy and I can't guarantee anything works, my
experiments with object-relational mapping in Zope are found at
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/ormapping.tar.gz . If ORMapping.py
is in the ZODB directory, you can use the following custom_zodb.py to
run
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
But storage of binary pickles was never the intention anyway. I created
a little interface that would allow you to store different classes in
different PostgreSQL tables. Before I got to implementing anything,
Is this much like the ZPatterns approach?
Which part
Fred Wilson Horch wrote:
You wrote:
Importing multiple objects simultaneously could result in a fair amount
of confusion...
Can you elaborate? When you import a folder, for example, it imports
the folder and all objects in it.
If there are some objects in the folder that have
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
I think the motivation people want an RDBMS storage beneth zodb is
because they understand RDBMSes these days are performant, relieable
and can quiete easy maintained.
The other motivations for an RDBMS are (1) people have existing schemas
and want Zope to access the
Joachim Werner wrote:
You know, it might be possible to get a team together to implement
this. How many out there would be interested in pursuing it further?
IMHO it's not as much work as it sounds at first. Zope being so
object-oriented, you really can replace one of its most
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy McKay wrote:
Yeah, I am currently base64'ing the data, and it works.
Ive seen this in some code but didnt want to say anything for fear of
sounding stupid. It doesnt seem right somehow.
See, this is the problem. I'm running into crunch-time at the
Joachim Werner wrote:
Hi!
Do you know that there already is a project for OR-Mapping in Zope
(actually
there are two ...)?
Yes, and I think the projects need to look into replacing parts of ZODB
rather than adding complexity. ZODB has pieces that can be split apart
and
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 11:01 AM 5/11/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Joachim Werner wrote:
The current design plans of SmartObjects are mainly based on the assumption
that we will not be able to change Zope itself. This is not a dogma for us,
however. I guess doing OR-mapping
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 05:42 PM 5/11/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I'm not quite clear on how exactly you suggest mapping from RDMBS -
ZODB. There's a *significant* (IMHO) impedance mismatch between ZODB's
arbitrarily identified variably structured single
Joachim Werner wrote:
Probably I'm daft because it is Friday night, but AFAIK ZODB and most
OODB's
store an object only once, keyed by its object id. The rest is just
references
through that oid, so objects that belong to more than one container can be
added to all these containers
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
I'm telling you there's a lot more you can do with the code that makes
snip
The next thing to do is to write a fishbowl proposal.
This sounds cool but made my head hurt :-S
Can you try and bring this back down to the level of us mere
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
One would define an ObjectMappingSchema whose job it is to store and
retrieve objects of a specific type and in a specific location. It
would usually grab a database connection object to do its work. When
loading, it would perform a query
Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
ZPatterns implements storage logic on the application level.
Applications have to be aware of (in fact they have to be centered
around) ZPatterns. This alternate approach keeps storage logic
independent of application logic. It lets you
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ORMappingDB
Comments encouraged!
Shane
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 04:13 PM 5/14/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Regarding performance, this method is actually ideal IMHO. Data is read
once, converted to an object, and kept for later connections, just like
ZODB.
[shrug] Not any different than ZPatterns
On Mon, 14 May 2001, ender wrote:
i want to thank DC (jim, shane, and paul) for inviting me to come to the new
DC offices. i had a great time and learned a bunch... and met
the BFDL.
It was good to talk with you!
i gave a quick overview of the smartobjects design/framework and jim and
R. David Murray wrote:
Now, if the ZMI were rewritten to be session based, and you used
a non-basic-auth based session, you could avoid the problem.
Want to volunteer to do the rewrite? grin
Actually if you install the CMFCore product and put a CookieCrumbler at
the root of your site, you get
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
If we had a standardized manipulation API or idioms (like JavaBeans) for
application objects, then having lots of ways to *implement* storage would
be a good thing. Different products and offerings could co-exist and
compete in the storage
Albert Langer wrote:
[Phillip]
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ORMappingDB
Comments encouraged!
[Albert]
I've added some there.
Jim highlighted a project Risk there:
Updates to RDBMS data outside of the OR mapping could cause
cached data to be inconsistent.
I agree!
New product:
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/LeakFinder
This product assists in locating memory leaks in Zope code. It uses
patterns we, at Digital Creations, often employ for fixing memory leaks.
It provides a way to get a controlled refcount and the traceback of
class instance creation.
I have written a proposal.
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ArmoredCatalog
Could it be that we're involved in yet another Battle of Fredericksburg
and we're trying to save innocent ZCatalogs from a ZODB conflict?
Nawww... ;-)
Shane
___
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2001 10:03:31 -0400 (EDT), Shane Hathaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now ZCatalog randomly generates ConflictErrors even if there are no
conflicts in the data being indexed. It's quite rare, however, and
there's machinery
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
How did you miss the point? That's exactly the point! :-)
Oh :)
Right now ZCatalog randomly generates ConflictErrors even if there are
no conflicts in the data being indexed.
This is why I think I've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My impression is that FileStorage implements a 32-bit id-type-thingy
somewhere (look at ZODB docs, I think there is something about this
somewhere), which limits it (in addition to the Linux kernel ext2 fs limit),
to 2GB. With 7.5 GB, I'd use a more advanced
marc lindahl wrote:
Does anyone have any comments on the reliability of PartitionedFileStorage
in this regard as a temporary solution? Is anyone using
PartitionedFileStorage in a production environment?
AFAIK no. Its functionality has already been superceded.
by?
On Thursday 07 June 2001 07:43, Toby Dickenson wrote:
Large catalog
updates (where every object is reindexed) also generate a lot of
conflicts.
Is that last bit true? I thought 'Update Catalog' created *new*
indexes. There might be a conflict on the root catalog object, but
not on the
On Thursday 07 June 2001 11:51, Erik Enge wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
It really doesn't matter how many conflicts there are. Within a
single transaction, 1 conflict is as bad as 100.
Why?
Because in Zope it means the whole request is processed again (which
can lead
On Thursday 07 June 2001 12:17, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 09:34 AM 6/7/01 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
One thing I didn't make clear in the proposal is that I'm interested
in repurposing ZCatalog as a general ZODB indexing mechanism and
essentially moving it down from the application layer
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
That is, in ZPatterns one can specify triggers such as:
WHEN OBJECT DELETED, CHANGED CALL
someCatalog.manage_uncatalog(self.absolute_url(1))
WHEN OBJECT ADDED, CHANGED CALL
someCatalog.manage_catalog(self,self.absolute_url(1))
After I read this again I realized what
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I was thinking that certain types of objects would be committed by the
transaction manager before all others. In this case, the catalog (or a
special object in the catalog) would be committed first. It would
resolve all conflicts in the contained
Morten W. Petersen wrote:
during testing of a mail product I've discovered that the Data.fs file may
bloat considerably after storing 50 messages. Packing the database will
reduce the Data.fs file to 20 MB (from 40 MB). Another thing is that
storing 50 messages takes a *long time* on a
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Did you catalog each message? What version of Zope?
Yes, every message was cataloged. Zope version 2.3.2
3) Manually zap the caches periodically, which is a capability of Zope
2.4.x.
Okay
Tim McLaughlin wrote:
root has a role called 'User' with 'View' permissions (anonymous is
disabled) and acl_users has a user called joe. joe can access objects in
folder2 according to the permissions set on the root by using acquisition
like this:
http://server/folder1/folder2/object1
joe
Jephte Clain wrote:
the question is: what transaction is commited with
get_transaction().commit() ? It is only the one associated
with the connection, or also the transaction in which is the
caller?
I mean, if my method is called from within Zope, is the
transaction of the caller commited?
Here are a couple of ideas I'd like to toss out. Proposals can take a
lot of time to write and it might be easier this way to flesh out the
details.
1) Optional password encryption. Right now passwords are stored as
clear text. What's interesting is that Zope can already authenticate
On Monday 18 June 2001 15:33, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:28:54PM -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
1) Optional password encryption. Right now passwords are stored as
clear text. What's interesting is that Zope can already authenticate
against SHA encrypted passwords
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Toby Dickenson wrote:
However, I dont think encrypting user passwords is enough. Data.fs may
contain plaintext passwords for relational databases, and in many
cases it contains arbitrary confidential information.
True. The RDBMS passwords are probably more sensitive
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Joachim Werner wrote:
Transparent Folders are used very often at iuveno. And we would like to do
so in the future because they really provide an easy way to structure
objects in folders. But with Zope 2.3.3 we get errors like that when we
start an instance that uses
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Joachim Werner wrote:
Tomorrow I hope to release a version of TransparentFolders that works
around the problem, so you can wait for that instead if you like.
Cool! Could you maybe put the patch that currently is applied in
OFS/__init.py__ into a Hotfix? This would
Jim Penny wrote:
DC and FSF somehow have to come to some understandings of the following
questions.
Here is my own view (not DC's offical word!)
Can a GPL (unmodified) component be distributed for Zope (at all)?
I think the message by Bradley Kuhn is a little misleading.
If you are the
On Friday 22 June 2001 04:24, Erik Enge wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Now, if the ZPL were GPL compatible, the GPL would be in full effect
for products. Digital Creations would automatically have the rights
to redistribute derivatives of ZWiki. I believe DC would even
On Friday 22 June 2001 06:55, Eric Roby wrote:
I'm glad to know the product is being used. I don't think it will be
in the core distribution since it causes a performance hit.
I use Transparent Folders HEAVILY in my site designs. There are some
Gotchas' that I have learned to deal with
A new release of Transparent folders is ready. The only real difference
is compatibility with Zope 2.3.3.
http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/TransparentFolders
CookieCrumbler has been re-released independently of CMF. Thanks to
living in the CMF for a while, the security hole has been
On Friday 22 June 2001 10:59, Chris Withers wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
If we're willing to start changing things at the C level, however,
there are more options.
Well, given how extremely useful skins seem as a concept (rather than
just in their CMF context), along with Transparent
On Friday 22 June 2001 12:33, Simon Michael wrote:
Thanks for a most illuminating thread. Slight clarification to a
comment of yours Shane -
Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GPL code together. ZWiki is just in a strange position because the
GPL is not actually in effect.
I'm
Andy McKay wrote:
It depends on your experience. In your opinion you find it easier (now I can
write a Zope product in my sleep I agree). Most Zope users however, in my
experience, try ZClasses first.
When I came to Zope, within a week I was getting ready to write a Python
product. (And I
marc lindahl wrote:
From: Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Trying the same thing with 2.4.0b2 and reporting the results
Yikes... I need CMF! So far it's not recommended with 2.4!
Are there plans to fix this in the 2.3 branch?
Actually, it was only not recommended that you use
Andre Schubert wrote:
after searching the soures if found a way the point of disaster.
in TransparentFolderPatch i changed the line:
if tpids and not self._v_no_transparent and name[:3] != '_p_' :
to:
if tpids and not self._v_no_transparent and name[:3] != '_p_' and
name[-11:] !=
Zopistas,
Please support or denounce this proposal. Integrated HTTPS support in
Zope would be really nice IMHO.
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ZServerSSLIntegration
Shane
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a high-traffic site, wouldn't the log get really big, really quickly with
tracebacks? It is also nice to have the tracebacks in the browser window
for debugging...
But the log won't grow more than Z2.log. Yes, it is nice to have the
tracebacks in the browser
Ivan Raikov wrote:
Recently, I had to replace ZPublisher's default
authentication scheme, as part of a product I'm working on. I am aware
of the existence of LoginManager, exUserFolder, etc., but in this case
I needed to have a custom login screen at root level, i.e. completely
get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I think this really should be an integration issue instead of a
Zope issue: use a front-end proxy server (i.e. Squid) and set up ACLs to
prevent this...
This hasn't been fixed because it's not well understood. Javascript can
POST an invisible form,
Following the Zope 2.5 plan, I have just added to CVS the capability for
user passwords to be encrypted in the standard user folder. Please try
it out. If it works correctly there should be no outwardly visible
differences.
I'm also soliciting the assistance of developers and users of
Following the Zope 2.5 plan, I have just added to CVS the capability for
user passwords to be encrypted in the standard user folder. Please try
it out. If it works correctly there should be no outwardly visible
differences.
I'm also soliciting the assistance of developers and users of custom
Romain Slootmaekers wrote:
Yo dudes,
VSEval in Documenttemplate tries to set Eval
No problem but RestictedPython has no Eval attribute by default
so you need to import it
add this line to RestrictedPython/__init__.py
import Eval
Actually, VSEval currently does *not* apply restrictions.
Holger Blasum wrote:
Dear *,
naively I volunteered for a talk on zope in autumn to a (small) CS student
audience. However, I must confess that do not understand the
basics about the API:
What is the most general and state-of-the-art way (including
necessary imports from the zope
Ken Manheimer wrote:
Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This hasn't been fixed because it's not well understood. Javascript can
POST an invisible form, AFAIK. The problem occurs on the browsers of
users who are *already authenticated*. It has nothing to do with Zope
or any server
Lupus Yonderboy wrote:
I have tried hooking __getattr__ and have a hard time
avoiding recursion; I have taken a look at the
ever-productive Shane Hathaway's TransparentFolder
product as well but I think I am let down by my lack
of understanding of the particulars of acquisition.
Here are
Andy Dawkins wrote:
Zope 3X requires Python 2.2b2.
Are you sure you mean Python2.2b2?
I tried this but seem to get problems with the pyexpat module.
Would a different version do, Or have you solved any problems with the
pyexpat module in 2.2.b2?
Make sure you have expat, including
Anthony Baxter wrote:
Behrens Matt - Grand Rapids wrote
Anthony Baxter wrote:
In that case, how about cutting a version which is 2.4.3 + the compiler
fixes? Crashes are bad, and it would be very nice to Make Them Go Away. :)
You already have that. Check out the Zope-2_4-branch from CVS (see
Romain Slootmaekers wrote:
Yo dudes,
I have problems with dependencies on Zope 2.4.3:
If I try to import OFS.SimpleItem directly, I get following problem.
(snip)
ImportError: cannot import name Persistent
If you do 'import Zope' first, you don't have this problem.
But I can't do that
seb bacon wrote:
Well, I just ran a very naive test and it suggests that zpt may be about
twice as slow as dtml.
I made a DTML Method, and a ZPT, identical to each other, containing
only HTML:
html
Test
/html
Then I ran the ab benchmarking tool against each method, thus:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Another data point. Copy paste of ParsedXML documents is normal
and fast when the object is in a folder not surrounded by too
many other folders (or objects in general, not sure yet). If I create
a bunch of very large folders sitting next to the ParsedXML document
Christian Theune wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 07:53:35AM -0500, Paul Everitt wrote:
A gentle reminder on some of the posts in this thread. Please don't
respond with I'd really like some good idea. Respond with I'm
willing to do the work for some good idea. That's part of the point
with
Jean-Paul Smets wrote:
I could find out that certain cookie names work, some others do not
Works
__ac_
__ac_ra
__ac_rak1
__ac_nex1
__ac_erp5
Does not work
__ac
__ac_rack1
__ac_rack12
Really strange.
What browser are you using? Strange things like this happen for me
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Magnus Heino wrote:
What browser are you using? Strange things like this happen for me
occasionally after a Mozilla upgrade, but I just delete the cookies for
the site and everything goes back to normal. I figure someone at
Netscape is just fiddling with the cookie
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Well, I have the energy, I just don't know where to start. But it's
beginning to look like I'll just have to roll up my sleeves and dive in
C code to hunt this beast down. And to think that I'd chosen Python as
my official programming language to avoid just
Anthony Baxter wrote:
Adrian Hungate wrote
moved to a different thread or earlier, before the fork, so that we could
simply kill senile threads without killing the entire shooting match?
unfortunately apache does this with seperate processes, not threads.
memory corruption and leaks
Eric Roby wrote:
Anyone had any experience trying to secure the transactions between ZEO
clients and a storage server??? Our shop is already using OpenSSH, I
have read some introductory information about OpenSSH. It is just not
clear to me the level of effort required to implement this or
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:19:11 -0500, Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There are some disadvantages: anybody who has an account on either
zeoclient or zeostorage has full read/write access to the database.
A VPN would also work, but you'd still have the local
201 - 300 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
