-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
Would it be possible to have a non-system python installed (by default
into /opt/python24) by the system python easy_install? I think it would be
useful to have eggs that provide commands on the path such as
On 11/1/07, Peter Sabaini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always wondered -- I never had any trouble with the system Pythons, or at
least not a problem that I could attribute to a system Python (Debian Stable
and Ubuntu LTS)
Well, try and easy_install i18ndude, and see all your Zope2 instances
Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil, evil (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
easy_install plone
to get their Plone site, it's a
Baiju M wrote:
Hi Limi,
Alexander Limi wrote:
Sorry if this has been asked hundreds of times before — I couldn't
find any info on this apart from the Summer of Code project related
to Zope 3.
Now only the packages under `zope` `zope.app` packages works
using Python 2.5 . I don't know
Alexander Limi wrote:
Will Zope 2 ever run on Python 2.5, or is that postponed indefinitely?
It will run on Python 2.5 when somebody makes it run.
We see an increasing amount of users trying to use Zope 2 with their
systems that have Python 2.5 as default.
Then I suggest you do something
On Thursday 01 November 2007 06:18:18 Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil, evil (quoting
Jim).
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:00 AM, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil,
evil (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
easy_install plone
to
Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil, evil (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
easy_install plone
to get their Plone site, it's a
I would like to point out that on this thread people are getting too
tied up with restrictions about *installing* stuff on the system
Python and forgetting that for example, buildout will not install
stuff on the system Python, but people might want to run a Zope (2)
buildout on Python 2.5 just
On Nov 1, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
I would like to point out that on this thread people are getting too
tied up with restrictions about *installing* stuff on the system
Python and forgetting that for example, buildout will not install
stuff on the system Python, but people
Hey,
[making Zope 2 work on Python 2.5]
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
[snip]
I believe this is a critical issue and the interested parts need to
work together on it. Maybe the Plone Foundation and the Zope
Foundation can work together and setup a bounty to fund some developer
to do this work?
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Jim Fulton wrote:
I think buildout should work harder to get along with system Python.
I intent to spend some effort on this. Martijn has suggested an
option to ignore site-packages which may go a long way.
Yeah, one of my clients uses workingenv to use
On 11/1/07, Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we are closely approaching the
EOL for Python 2.4. Supposedly when Python 2.6 comes out next year
Python 2.4 will be officially discouraged and will not receive any
more fixes other than security fixes.
This seems to be a common
On 11/1/07, Fred Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to be a common misconception; I'm not sure why.
Python 2.4 has *already* hit EOL. There will only be security fixes
released in source form.
When a new Python 2.X is released, a final 2.X-1 bugfix release is
made and 2.X becomes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Jim Fulton wrote:
I think buildout should work harder to get along with system Python.
I intent to spend some effort on this. Martijn has suggested an
option to ignore site-packages which
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil,
evil (quoting
Jim).
--On 1. November 2007 23:47:28 -0400 Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The
Would it be possible to have a non-system python installed (by default
into /opt/python24) by the system python easy_install? I think it would be
useful to have eggs that provide commands on the path such as
easy_install_nonsystem24, virtualenv_nonsystem24, python_nonsystem24. With
a better
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil, evil (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
easy_install plone
to get their Plone site, it's a necessary evil evil evil. ;)
--On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil, evil (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
--On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil, evil (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
21 matches
Mail list logo
